Designations and Outline Plans

Similar documents
9 Cross Boundary Processes

B. Stakeholder Guide: Infrastructure and utility providers

AND. Principal Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the Act In Chambers at Auckland CONSENT ORDER

National Policy Statement on Electricity Transmission. Implementation Guidance for Local Authorities

A new optional streamlined planning process

THE SECOND PHASE OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT REFORM

Report for Agenda Item: 2

Greens NSW. Planning, Building and Infrastructure Policy. Principles. Policy Detail. (Under review)

Regulatory Impact Statement: Overview of required information

B1: THE MAIN PROVISIONS OF THE PLANNING REGIME

A Guide to the Municipal Planning Process in Saskatchewan

E20 Māori Land. (2) The importance of economic development to support the occupation, development and use of Māori land is recognised.

Understanding the State Planning Policy July 2017 Changes to state interest statements, policies and assessment benchmarks

A new optional collaborative planning process

National Level AN EVERYDAY GUIDE TO THE RMA SERIES 1.4

RE: Submission on the Proposed National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity

Revised functions for Resource Management Act 1991 decision-makers

SRIE.1 Strategic Rural Industries Environment

ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT AMENDMENT (PART 3A REPEAL) Act 2011

INLAND PORT SPECIAL PLANNING AUTHORITY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 169 AND 92 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991

State Significant Development and State Significant Infrastructure

Response to the Productivity Commission s Using Land for Housing recommendations

City Rail Link. Urban Design CRL

Draft Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan

Wind farm state code and guideline

Report to COUNCIL for noting

Integrated Transport

Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 1

Acid Sulphate Soils Recommendations in response to submissions on the Proposed Regional Plan for Northland - Section 42A hearing report

Submission to Local Government and Environment Select Committee on RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REFORM BILL (DECEMBER 2012)

PULSE CANADA. Bill C-49 The Transportation Modernization Act. Sept 5, 2017

Assessment of state significant development and infrastructure

19 GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS

Auckland Light Rail Industry Briefing. 31 July 2018, Viaduct Events Centre, Auckland Nau mai, Haere mai Welcome all

1 Introduction The Plan. 1.2 Plan Coverage

SRIE.1 Strategic Rural Industries Environment

IN THE MATTER. of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND

EROSION, SEDIMENTATION, ETC

PROPOSED APPROACH FOR AUCKLAND S RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PROGRAMME

IN THE MATTER OF THE MORDIALLOC BYPASS PROJECT ENVIRONMENT EFFECTS STATEMENT

C11: REGENERATION, COMPULSORY PURCHASE POLICY AND OVER SITE DEVELOPMENT

Submission to Local Government and Environment Select Committee on HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA BILL (JUNE 2012)

GLASGOW AIRPORT RAIL LINK BILL NETWORK RAIL OBJECTION. 1. Introduction

Is the Dual Planning System of New Zealand under the Resource Management Act A Resilient Process? LMD PLANNING CONSULTANCY

Te Hunga Roia Maori o Aotearoa (Maori Law Society Inc.) SUBMISSION: Resource Management (Simplifying and Streamlining) Amendment Bill

Plan Change 85A: Rural Production Environment

OPERATIVE STATUS and SEAL OF THE COUNCIL

10 Network Utilities Introduction Kaipara District Council Engineering Standards Resource Management Act 1991 Requirements

Environment Canterbury regional council works with the people of Canterbury to manage the region s air, water and land. We are committed to the

Charter for High Speed Rail A Greengauge 21 commentary

Section 32 Evaluation Report Business Mixed Use Zone (formerly the Business Zone) Contents

Crossrail Environmental Statement Volume 1

Eastern Newfoundland Regional Appeal Board

RMA amendments Workshop 26 January 2016

Diana Plesovs, Senior Planner

Regulatory Impact Statement

This part of the Plan explains what a District Plan is and provides a user friendly guide.

Draft State Planning Policy Road and Rail Noise

State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007

Resource Management Act Survey of Local Authorities

Derbyshire Constabulary RIGHT TO REQUEST TIME OFF FOR TRAINING GUIDANCE POLICY REFERENCE 10/292. This guidance is suitable for Public Disclosure

9 OBJECTIVES/POLICIES: Hazardous Substances and Contaminated Land. 9. Hazardous Substances and Contaminated Land

Draft Code of Construction Practice

3 Planning and design of the transport network. Chapter State highway and local road networks

Earthquake-prone Building Programme

E37. Genetically modified organisms [CIV : Federated Farmers of New Zealand Incorporated]

The aims of the Kaipara River Catchment Water Allocation Strategy are:

23 Network Utility Operations

Changes to the Ontario Heritage Act. Discussion Guide

Eastern Newfoundland Regional Appeal Board. Activity Plan

Review of Railway Safety Act Authorities and Oversight Provisions. Prepared for the Railway Association of Canada

PART A INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT

ORION NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT BROMLEY ZONE SUBSTATION, CHRISTCHURCH

Chapter 7 Transport. Appendix A to Legal Submissions. Council's Revised Stage 2 Proposal (marked up) 1 September 2015 version

Chapter 4 Planning and statutory requirements. Chapter 4 Planning and statutory requirements

Plan Provision Summary of Submission Decision Requested

Palmerston North City Council

10.1 OBJECTIVES. Note: Refer to Section 6 for Issues, Methods of Implementation, and Environmental Results Anticipated.

Regulatory Impact Statement

EARTHQUAKE- PRONE BUILDINGS POLICY

2013 Bill 28. First Session, 28th Legislature, 62 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 28 MODERNIZING REGIONAL GOVERNANCE ACT

subdivision WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT RULES ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

That will also contribute to achievement of a number of objectives and policies in the Regional Policy Statement.

COUNTRY REPORT: NEW ZEALAND. The Legitimacy of Climate Change Litigation: Buller Coal in The Supreme Court

Parker Rhodes BEFORE THE WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL. IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND

NZCPS 2010 Guidance note Policy 9: Ports

Key Issues Report. New Zealand Transport Agency. Christchurch City Council

National Environmental Standards for Sources of Human Drinking Water

STANDARD TECHNIQUE : EW1AB/1

NSW Heritage Law. Planning, Development & Heritage. Overview. Last updated: August 2012

REPORT Meeting Date: Regional Council

1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PLAN

Draft Set of National Planning Standard Released for Consultation

Content Copy Of Original

E37. Genetically modified organisms

Eastern Newfoundland Regional Appeal Board Annual Report

FORM 18 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT UNDER S181 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 (RMA)

INVESTING IN OUR ECONOMY: NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR TRANSMISSION REINFORCEMENT

SECTION 32 REPORT - TRANSPORT CHAPTER 7

Transcription:

Designations and Outline Plans Andrea Rickard - Technical Director: Planning Fiona Blight - Associate: Planning 24 June 2010

Purpose of this session Review the RMA provisions for designations and outline plans Discuss the recent and possible future RMA changes Examine some case studies

Historical Context Designations have been provided for in legislation since the Town and Country Planning Act 1953 Mechanism to provide for the establishment and operation of essential services or public works infrastructure Only available to Requiring Authorities They are personal to the Requiring Authority

What is a Designation? Used in a District Plan for: Consenting a public work or infrastructure Identifying land or restrictions needed to undertake the work Protecting land from being used in a way that might hinder the designated purpose Provides, through land protection, lead time to acquire land or rights Lapse periods specified (default of 5 years, often longer) Like a spot zone Shown on District Planning maps (and in any relevant schedules) notated as to its purpose (e.g. school, motorway) Confirmed Designations supersede district plan rules but underlying zoning remains Ability to use land for other activities

Auckland City District Plan: Isthmus Section

Manukau Operative District Plan: Map 43

Who are Requiring Authorities? A Minister of the Crown A local or regional authority A network utility operator approved by the Minister for the Environment

Requiring Authorities include

Network Utility Operators Defined in Section 166 of the Act and include: Gas, petrol or geothermal energy distributor Radio and telecommunications operator Electricity distributor Water supplier or undertakes drainage/sewerage systems Road or rail constructor / operator Airport authority / airport approach service provider

A designation is very useful to have because. Provide for public works and infrastructure activities that would not generally be provided for under a District Plan Use the land for the purpose it is designated Control all activities on designated land Compulsorily acquire land under the Public Works Act Enter private land to undertake investigations Decision making is retained with Requiring Authority Protection of land takes effect from serving designation

Designations A designation can be included in a District Plan in two ways: As a new designation; or Rolled over from a previous District Plan A new designation is assessed for public notification (this is a key change under the 2009 amendment) A rolled over designation is notified along with the reviewed district plan A designation that exists may be altered Two non-notification tests for alterations (this is a key change under the 2009 amendment) A local authority may designate land within its own jurisdiction

The up front process for new designations Prepare a Notice of Requirement (NOR) Subject to Part 2 Objectives Necessity of the designation or works to achieve the objectives Consideration of alternative sites, routes or methods (when the land is not owned; or significant adverse effect) need to demonstrate a robust process can consider do nothing don t have to choose best alternative Effects on the environment Relevant national, regional, district policy framework Land Requirement plans and schedule The nature of any restrictions Any other matters

Case Study: Marsden Point Rail Line

Case Study: Marsden Point Rail Line New designation Long term planning mechanism NOR Objectives include: Protect a rail corridor through using designation process to secure land required for the construction, operation and maintenance of the railway Link the port at Marsden Point to the National Rail network via the North Auckland Rail Line Offer an alternative port in the upper North Island serviced by rail Provide an alternative safe and sustainable transport option for moving freight in Northland Assist in accommodating future economic growth in Northland

Case Study: Marsden Point Rail Line Alternatives process: throughout life of project Options constrained by operational requirements Started with broad corridor options Alignment changes on preferred corridor Minor changes on individual properties Consultation key Management of environmental effects avoided, remedied, mitigated: through alternatives process through management plan process during construction through ecological enhancement

The Council process New: serve on the District Council NOR to designate land Alter: give notice to the District Council of requirement to alter designation A NOR / alteration relates to land use & may or may not be accompanied by applications for regional resource consents A Council cannot refuse to accept a NOR or an alteration The Council can ask for further information on a NOR Under section 92 consent authority can at any reasonable time before the hearing request further information or commission an expert report If an alteration meets section 181(3) no ability to ask for further information

The Council process continued The NOR is assessed for notification The alteration is assessed against non-notification tests Public notification process same as for resource consents

Decision Making Hearings may be held on notified NOR s The Council will make a recommendation that the NOR be confirmed, modified, or rejected The NOR objectives can not be challenged Requiring authority can accept or reject the Council recommendation in its decision Recourse (appeal) is to the Environment Court Once the NOR is confirmed the Council must include it in its District Plan

Projects that cross multiple District Plans Separate NOR is made for each District Plan Difficulties: Different information can be needed Different changes requested from each Council Different lengths of time to process Solutions: Integrated processing Develop common design elements/templates Develop liaison programme with Councils Consistency in RA decision-making Separate Outline Plans

For example

Outline Plan 176A When giving effect to a designation, the Requiring Authority can submit an Outline Plan to the Council In some circumstances the Outline Plan can be waived An Outline Plan cannot be rejected under section 88 Section 92 does not apply Council has 20 working days to accept an Outline Plan or request changes The Requiring Authority may accept, in part or in full or reject Recourse is to the Environment Court

Case Study: Vic Park Tunnel

Case Study: Vic Park Tunnel Alteration to designation & new designation 2 District plans 5 NORs Issues: Construction effects Heritage Urban design Visual & Landscape Contamination Multiple landowners Noise

Case Study: Vic Park Tunnel

Case Study: Vic Park Tunnel

Case Study: Vic Park Tunnel Option of an Outline Plan waiver in conditions Management Plan framework

Outline Plans in the media

Key 2009 RMA changes Notification: Old all new designations publicly notified New notification tests now apply (sections 95A to 95F) Introduction of the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA)

EPA Proposal of National Significance Can serve NOR on EPA Interim effect of designations now refers to the EPA as well as Councils EPA cannot reject NOR Ability to seek further information under s149 Then, the EPA has 20 working days to recommend to the Minister: Board of Inquiry Environment Court; or Refer to TLA

RM (Requiring Authorities) Amendment Bill Bill introduced to house in late 2009 Seeks to strengthen test for becoming a Requiring authority Strengthen through requiring the project, work, or network utility operations to be necessary rather than appropriate (which is current scenario); and By now requiring that the project, work or network utility operations are in the public interest

Questions