Gender Participation and Role of Women in Livestock Management Practices in Bundelkhand Region of Central India

Similar documents
62 Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu. 13 (2), May, Economics of Goat Farming Under Traditional Low Input Production System in Uttar Pradesh

Participation of Farm Women in Animal Husbandry in Anand District of Gujarat

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016,

Training Needs Assessment of Women Farmers on Livestock Production Management in Bundi District of Rajasthan, India

Role of Women in Spate areas of Sindh Province

The present study has certain specific research objectives: 1. ' To study the distribution and growth of landless labourers in the study area.

Role of Livestock Husbandry in Livelihood Generation and Sustainability of Small and Marginal Farmers in Moradabad District, Uttra Pradesh, India

SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF WOMEN GOAT KEEPERS AND REARING CHALLANGES IN GOAT IN NADIA DISTRICT OF WEST BENGAL

Work Participation of Women in Agriculture in Odisha

Gender mapping of the roles of Garo people of Meghalaya engaged in dairy farming

Comparative studies on the socio-economic status of fishery cooperatives societies, SHGs and fishermen groups in the Bastar district of Chhattisgarh

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Abstract:- Keywords: Rural, Women, Entrepreneurs, Dairy.

Adoption of Improved Animal Husbandry Practices by Dairy Farmers

Technological Problems and Training Needs of Dairy Farmers

Climate change and economic changes in India: The impacts on agriculture

ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF LIVESTOCK ENTERPRISE IN A SEMI-ARID WATERSHED

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 4, 2017,

International Journal of Academic Research ISSN: Vol.2, Issue-1(2) (Special), January-March, 2015

A Study on Farm Households Coping Strategies Against the Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture: A Study in Cuddalore District

International Journal of Home Science 2017; 3(3): Amisha Kumari, Rashmee Yadav and Neelma Kunwar

Backyard Poultry Farming, a Suitable Intervention for Tribal People for their Livelihood Support and Nutritional Security

COST AND RETURN FROM MILK PRODUCTION AMONG TRIBALS (GUJJARS) IN DIFFERENT DISTRICTS OF JAMMU REGION OF J&K STATE IN INDIA

AN ANALYSIS OF AGRICULURAL SCHEMES RUN BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA FOR FARMERS: A CASE STUDY OF DISTRICT SIRSA

Socio-Economic Condition of Female Agricultural Labourers- With Special Reference to Mandya District

Factor analysis related to production constraints with special reference to rabbit breeding farmers in Tirunelveli District

An Analysis of Cost and Returns of Sugarcane Production in Krishnagiri District of Tamil Nadu

Technological Empowerment of Rural Women of Udaipur District (Rajasthan) in Animal Husbandry through SHGs

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF WOMEN AGRICULTURAL LABOURERS IN GRAPES FARMING IN COIMBATORE DISTRICT

Economic Analysis of Tribal Farm in Gadchiroli District of Maharashtra, India

EXTENT OF ADOPTION OF RECOMMENDED IMPROVED DAIRY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES BY THE YOUTH FARMERS OF CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT OF KARNATAKA

CONSTRAINTS OF WOMEN DAIRY CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES IN ADOPTION OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY PRACTICES

Impact Assessment of Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY)

A Study on Socio-Economic Status of the Farm Women of Tumakuru District of Karnataka State, India

Peoples Participation, Gender Equality

Analysis of the profile on participating and nonparticipating farmers in chickpea production technology

Goat Farmers Coping Strategy for Sustainable Livelihood Security in Arid Rajasthan: An Empirical Analysis 1

Development Goals with Special Reference to Women in Agriculture in Sri Lanka and India

The Role of Rural Women in Watershed Development Project J.Nittin Johnson 1, S.Govindaradjane 2, T.Sundararajan 3 1

SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS OF FARMERS AND THEIR PERCEPTION ABOUT TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION: A CASE STUDY

Engendering Rural Livelihoods in Karnataka A Socio-economic Assessment

Association of Age and SES of Rural Women with their participation in Farming Activities

FARMER'S PERCEPTION TOWARDS AGRICULTURE TECHNOLOGY IN TRIBAL REGION OF RAJASTHAN

Socio-Economic Upliftment of Women through Dairy Enterprise: A Study of in Barauni Dairy in Bihar

SOCIAL STATUS OF WOMEN ENGAGED IN SERICULTURE ENTERPRISE IN UTTARAKHAND

WOMEN PARTICIPATION IN CARP CULTURE ACTIVITIES IN INDIA

Vikas Kumar and Maharaj Singh ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi (Uttar Pradesh), India.

Water Harvesting. India

Livelihood Problems of Small and Marginal Farm Families in Rural Areas of Haryana State, India

Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu. 15 (2), May, Perception of Farming Youth towards Farming

SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE SAMPLE HOUSEHOLDS

Annual Outcome Survey Report. Tejaswini Rural Women Development Programme, Madhya Pradesh 3/21/16

Socioeconomic Analysis of Alternative Farming Systems in Improving Livelihood Security of Small Farmers in Selected Areas of Bangladesh

Changes of Agricultural Land Uses in Rural Area and Causes Behind It: A Case Study of Kamargaon Union Under Tanore Upazila in Rajshahi District

Feminization of Indian Agriculture: Status of Women Farmers

Information Need of Rural Women In Agriculture And Their Preference of Information Sources: A Case of Four Villages of Uttar Pradesh

Studies on the Participation of Women in Decision Making about Dairy Occupation in Parbhani District of Maharashtra State

A Study of Temporal Changes in Land Use and Cropping Pattern in Jammu district of J&K State

Study of the socio - economic characteristics of dairy and non- dairy farmers

CONSTRAINTS OF ADOPTING ECOFRIENDLY RICE FARMING PRACTICES

Income Enhancement through animal husbandry

TECHNOLOGICAL NEEDS OF RURAL WOMEN IN SELECTED DRUDGERY REDUCING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO ANIMAL HUSBANDRY

Dr. Vanaja Ramprasad. GREEN Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, INDIA.

Marketable Surplus and Price-Spread for Maize in Hamirpur District of Himachal Pradesh

NABARD. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development

Knowledge of Dairy Farmers about Improved Animal Husbandry Practices in Kheda District of Gujarat

Marketing Channels, Marketing Cost, Margin and Producer s Share in Consumer s Rupee in Paddy Marketing

Deatiled Project Report Vamanapuram IWMP 1

Economics of Milk Production in Mandya District of Karnataka

ECONOMICS OF FARMING SYSTEM IN SOUTH - EAST RAJASTHAN

Economic analysis of milk production in Rewari district of Haryana

Project overview BSSEC

INDIAN SCHOOL MUSCAT SENIOR SECTION DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCE CLASS: IX TOPIC/CHAPTER: 1: The Story Of Palampur THE GREEN REVOLUTION IN PUNJAB

TRAINING NEEDS OF DAIRY FARMERS

Moni Singh *, Nishith Gupta, Laxmi and R. P. Sharma

Annual Outcome Survey Report

Demographic profile and distribution of livestock farmers according to knowledge and awareness level in Institute Village Linkage Programme

PROBLEMS OF MILK PRODUCER IN BUDALUR BLOCK OF THANJAVUR DISTRICT OF TAMILNADU

Watershed Success Stories from Andhra Pradesh

Abstract. Introduction. Methodology

Analysis of technological gap in potato production technology

NORDIC CLIMATE FACILITY (NCF) Promoting Renewable Energy Technologies for Enhanced Rural Livelihoods

Session - II. Livelihood Linkages of Trade in Agricultural Products. A Presentation By

Constrains Perceived by the Dairy Farmers in Irrigated Ecosystem: A Case Study from Damodar Command Area, West Bengal

Rampur: Village Economy

Pearl of oil called as soya. Soybean (Glycine

Performance of Livestock Sector in India (With Reference to Bovine Population)

Factors Influencing Economic Viability of Marginal and Small Farmers in Punjab 1

The Agrarian Structure of Andhra Pradesh

East African PLEC General Meeting Arusha, Tanzania, 26-28, November, Household Diversity in the Smallholder farms of Nduuri, Embu, Kenya.

Constraints in Adoption of Improved Cultivation Practices of Black Gram

INVITATION FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST FOR. Evaluation Study in Madhya Pradesh. Small Farmers Agribusiness Consortium. August Kranti Marg, Hauz Khas,

POULTRY REVOLUTION IN LOHARDAGA A SUCCESS STORY

Integrated Fodder Development Programme

Farmers Perception towards Livestock Extension Service : A Case Study

CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS IN DAIRY VALUE CHAINS. Analysing and sharing challenges and opportunities in India and Kenya. Supported by:

Making smallholder resilient agriculture work for women farmers : The case of system of rice intensification (SRI) in India

Labour Demand and Labour-saving Options: A Case of Groundnut Crop in India

Women Self Help Group: A tool for Improving Decision Making in Agriculture Activities and Household Food Consumption Pattern

Study on the socio-economic condition and productive performances of backyard chicken in some selected areas of Pabna district

Training Needs Assessment of Tribal Farmers of Madhya Pradesh in Animal Husbandry Practices

Transcription:

Gender Participation and Role of Women in Livestock Management Practices in Bundelkhand Region of Central India Seema Mishra*, Satyawati Sharma, Padma Vasudevan, R. K. Bhatt, Sadhna Pandey, Maharaj Singh, B.S. Meena and S.N. Pandey *Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi (U.P.) Development Alternatives, Tara Gram, Orchha, Tikamgarh (M.P.) Abstract The present work studies gender participation in crop production and animal husbandry in the villages of Bundelkhand region in central India. The effect of different socio- economic factors such as age, education and land holding on the participation of women in different activities per day was also analyzed. 260 farmers were surveyed through open-ended questions but for detailed study 120 farmers (including 90 women) were involved from the two villages in Jhansi (U.P.) and members of 11 SHGs working on livelihood issues at community land in Chardwari area of Orchha, Tikamgarh (M.P.). Mean scores were analyzed to get frequency and percentage for the level of participation. It was found that most of the hard work in animal husbandry and crop production was done by women while men were involved in those activities where major decision making was needed. The majority of women respondents were in the age group 25-50 years (58%), illiterate (58%) and belonged to the category of marginal farmers (48%). A strong impact of socio- economic factors such as age, education and land holding was observed on the relative participation of farm women in different activities. In total they spent about 14-17 hours per day on different household and farm activities. The illiterate (16.35 hrs. /day), landless (17.3 hrs./day) and women in age group of 25-50 years (16.5 hrs./day) were found to be more involved in different activities per day. Results pertaining to these findings are discussed in this paper. 1. Introduction According to the 2001 census of India, about 74% of women are involved in agriculture and allied activities out of a total female working population (Anonymous, 2005). The data shows that there is a sharp decline of 11% of women in the agriculture sector in comparison to the 1991 census. But, agriculture in India is still a family enterprise where the family participates as a unit and the share of women is half of the human resource in farming. The social, economic and cultural conditions of the area determine women s participation in home and farm activities. It also varies from region to region and within a region, their involvement varies among different farming systems, castes, classes and socio- economic status (Swaminathan, 1985). In most parts of the country, women of higher caste and socioeconomic status are not allowed to participate in on-farm activities. In poor families, the women are the main performers in the field and income earned by them goes directly into the food basket of the family while the male s income goes in social taboos like drinking, smoking and gambling. But the role of women in economic and social development has not received due recognition so far in our society. ISSN 1023 2001 www.ivcs.org.uk/ijrs Article 2 Page 1 of 9

In this context efforts have been made by the authors to evaluate the gender participation of males and females in different on-farm activities and the impact of factors such as age, education and land holding on the participation of women in different household and on-farm activities in Bundelkhand region of Central India. 2. Materials and method 2.1 The study area Bundelkhand region is located between 23 8`-26 31` latitude and 78 11`- 81 31` E longitude. This region is characterized as a hot semi arid eco region with a growing period of 90-150 days. The annual rainfall which is often erratic ranges from 838.6 to 1251mm over the region. The diurnal variation in temperature is very high. This study involves farmers of two villages from district Jhansi (Uttar Pradesh) and 125 self help group (SHG) members from Orchha, district Tikamgarh (Madhya Pradesh) working on natural resource management and livelihood issues with a national NGO, Development Alternatives. Figure -1: Location map of Bundelkhand region in Central India ISSN 1023 2001 www.ivcs.org.uk/ijrs Article 2 Page 2 of 9

2.2 Data Collection 260 farmers, 80-80 from selected villages and 100 from SHGs, were surveyed and due to incomplete information and inconsistency in data 120 farmers (involving 90 women) were selected for detailed study. Data was collected through participatory rural appraisal (PRA), focused group discussion and survey by empirical investigation. Survey was mainly done on a pre tested and modified format by open ended interviews about the gender participation of both males and females in different on-farm activities related to crop production and livestock management. The impact of factors such as age, education and land holding on relative time spent in different daily chores and on farm activities particularly by women was also documented. The age of respondents was studied at three levels - <25 yrs, 25-50 yrs and > 50 yrs while the education level was distributed as illiterate, primary level and middle level or above. On the basis of their land holdings, farmers were classified as big (> 6 ha), small (1-2 ha), marginal farmers (<1h a) and landless farmwomen. A stratified random sampling technique was used for this purpose. The collected data was tabulated and statistical tools like mean and percentage were used to come to a logical conclusion. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1 Gender participation in farm activities The different management practices carried out in crop production were identified as ploughing of fields, sowing of seeds, weeding, harvesting, threshing, winnowing and storage of grain and fodder at studied sites. It can be observed from Table1 that there was a division of labour in the performance of all activities. The ploughing of fields (86%) was the mainstay of men. However, 14% farmers preferred to involve women also, mainly for cleaning of the field. Activities like sowing of seed (72%), weeding (85%), harvesting (50%), winnowing (98%) and storage of grain and dry fodder (40%) were mostly done by women. For harvesting (33%) and threshing (42%), both were found to participate. Involvement of women in livestock management practices varied depending upon the type of management practices. Data presented in Table 1 shows that most activities like collection of fodder (88%), cleaning of animals and sheds (67%), feeding animals (79%), milking (46%) and traditional healthcare (67%) are performed by women. Milk disposal (85%), sale (96%) purchase of animals (100%), vaccination (100%) and breeding of animals are mainly done by men. For watering, 62% of men are involved. Because of drought and scarcity of underground water in Bundelkhand region, women have to fetch drinking water from wells situated in low lying areas from long distances. Due to the prevalence of grazing in the area, most animals drink water from community hand pumps or stored rainwater in ditches or ponds. Senior males (62%) of the family take animals for grazing in most families 3.2 Gender participation in decision making about farm practices It was observed that in decision making regarding selection of crop for the season, procurement and sowing seeds of new varieties, breeds of animals, selling of fodder, milk and animals and procurement of fertilizers, the senior most males of the family are involved. Women were found to bring information regarding new technologies from aanganwadis and self help groups (SHGs) but for the adoption of new technologies, the final decisions were taken by male members of the family (Table 2). This may also be because of the low risk bearing capacity of farmers in that region due to droughts and low soil fertility. 3.3 Association between socio- economic factors and participation of farmwomen in different farm activities ISSN 1023 2001 www.ivcs.org.uk/ijrs Article 2 Page 3 of 9

In this study the association between socioeconomic factors and participation of 90 women from a total sample of 120 was evaluated in different farm activities (Table 3). The percent composition of farmwomen in different categories of age, education and land holding is presented in Table 3. Of the women surveyed, 23%, 58% and 20% were of < 25 years, between 25-50 years and > 50 years of age, respectively. The majority were illiterate (58%), 31% had studied up to primary level and 11% were educated up to middle level. On the basis of land holding, the percentage of farmwomen in big farmer, small farmer, marginal farmer and landless were 13%, 22%, 48% and 17%, respectively. 3.3.1 Age and participation in different activities The overall time spent by farm women on domestic and farm activities varied from 14-16 hours/day (Table 4). Women of the middle age group (25-50 years) spent most of their time performing activities related to household and farm as compared to those from other age groups. Farmwomen below 25 years of age were generally newly married, in their reproductive stage and because of certain social customs, did not participate actively in farm activities. Similarly, women above 50 years of age, because of health problems and other duties participated less in farm activities. These findings clearly show that the middle age group of farmwomen devoted more time to farm and household activities. 3.3.2 Education and participation in different activities Data presented in Table 4 indicates that there was a strong impact of education level on the performance of farm women in different farm activities. The total time spent in household and farm activities by illiterate, education up to primary and education up to middle and above women was 16.35 hrs. /day, 16.05 hrs. /day and 15.45 hrs. /day, respectively. Illiterate women spent comparatively more time in different activities. Women educated up to middle and above spent more time in household activities and collection of fuel and fodder rather than in crop production and livestock care. This shows the ability of educated women in proper management of different activities that also took less time. 3.3.3 Land holding and participation in different activities On the basis of land holding, a strong correlation was observed in their participation in different household and farm activities (Table 4). Landless laborers spent maximum (17.3 hours/ day) time doing different activities. Their major time was spent in the performance of farm and animal husbandry activities rather than household; this was mainly to generate extra resources by participating in income generating activities. The big farmwomen were found to spend more time (6.50 hours/day) in household activities because for farm and animal husbandry work, they totally depend upon landless laborers and marginal farmers. The major time spent by big farm women in agriculture activities was in winnowing, clearing and storage of grains and seeds. The small and marginal farm women comparatively spent more time in animal husbandry, collection of fuel and fodder than big farm women, mainly to save money being spent hiring labour. Conclusion It can be concluded from the study that women were the main performers in crop production as well as animal husbandry activities in the area of study. However, for decision making on farm activities, it was mainly men who were involved. For effective and beneficial participation of women in any activity, it is imperative to enhance the level of education for better management and dispersal of knowledge in society. Acknowledgement ISSN 1023 2001 www.ivcs.org.uk/ijrs Article 2 Page 4 of 9

The first author is grateful to the Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India for giving financial support under Women Scientist Fellowship Scheme-B. References v Anonymous. 2005. The Hindu Business Line, 30 Dec. v Swaminathan, M.S. 1985. Imparting rural women perspective to agriculture research and development. Report of the Project Design Workshop on Women in Farming Systems, held At the International Rice Research Centre, Los Banos, Phillippines, April 10. ISSN 1023 2001 www.ivcs.org.uk/ijrs Article 2 Page 5 of 9

Table 1: Gender wise participation in farm activities of sample farmers at selected sites in Bundelkhand region (n=120) Farm Activities Relative participation (no. of sample farmers) Female Male Both 1. Ploughing of fields 2. Sowing of seeds 3. Weeding 4. Harvesting 5. Threshing 6. Winnowing 7. Storage of grains and fodder 8. Collection of fodder from fields, community land 9. Procurement of feed and fodder from market 10. Cleaning of animals and shed 11. Feeding of animals 12. Watering 13.Grazing 14. Milking 15. Milk disposal 16. Sale of animals 17. Purchase of animals 18. Traditional health care to animals 19. Vaccination and visits to animal hospital 20. Breeding of animals 86 (72) 102 (85) 60 (50) 20 (17) 98 (82) 48 (40) 105 (88) 20 (17) 80 (67) 95 (79) 45 (38) 55 (46) 80 (67) 103 (86) 28 (23) 20 (17) 50 (42) 85 25 (21) 62(52) 95 (79) 40 (33) 102 (85) 115 (96) 120 25 (21) 120 120 17 (14) 16 (13) 18 (15) 40 (33) 50 (42) 17 (14) 52 (43) 13 (11) 25 (21) 13 (11) Figures in parenthesis are percentage ISSN 1023 2001 www.ivcs.org.uk/ijrs Article 1 Page 6 of 9

Table -2: Relative participation in decision making on farm activities of sample farmers at selected sites in Bundelkhand region (n=120) Farm activities Relative decision making (no. of sample farmers) Women Men Both 1. Selection of crops of the season 2. Selection and procurement of seeds of new varieties 3. Selection of breed of animals 4. Storage of green fodder for lean period 5. Selling of surplus dry fodder 6. Procurement of dry fodder from market 7. Selling of green fodder in market 8. Procurement of fertilizers 9. Selling of livestock 10. Selling of milk Figures in parenthesis are percentage 30 (25) 35 (29) 40 (33) 105 (88) 35 (29) 54 (45) 25 (21) 56 (47) 80 (67) 85 (71) 80 (67) 75 (63) 112 (93) 56 (47) 95 (79) 98 (82) 52 (43) 7 (6) 7 (6) 12 (10) ISSN 1023 2001 www.ivcs.org.uk/ijrs Article 1 Page 7 of 9

Table 3: Distribution of farmwomen according to their socio-economic characteristic at selected sites Character Group (Age and Education) No. of respondents* Percent (%) Age < 25 years 21 23 25-50 years 52 58 >50 years 17 20 Total 90 100 Education Illiterate 52 58 Primary 28 31 Middle and above 10 11 Total 90 100 Land holding Big farmers 12 Small farmers 20 Marginal farmers 43 Landless 15 Total 90 * 90 respondents were women in sample farmers of 120 analyzed 13 22 48 17 100 ISSN 1023 2001 www.ivcs.org.uk/ijrs Article 1 Page 8 of 9

Table 4: Association between different factors and participation (Average time spent/day in hrs.) in different activities by Farmwomen at selected sites Activities Age group Education level Land holding <25 years 25-50 years >50 years Illiterate Primary Middle and above Big farmers Small farmers Marginal farmers Landless farmers Household activities 5.30 (37.2) 4.8 (29) 3.00 (22.0) 5.30 (32.4) 5.00 (31.15) 5.50 (36.0) 6.50 (46.4) 5.40 (34) 5.0 (30.3) 4.0 (23) Agriculture 0 (17.5) 3.30 (20) 3.00 (22.0) 2.40 (15.0) 0 (15.58) 2.15 (14.1) 2.8 (20.2) (16) (15.2) 3.0 (17.3) Animal husbandry Collection of fodder Collection of fuel 2.25 (15.8) 2.20 (15.43) 2.00 (14.0) 3.30 (20) 2.80 (18) 2.30 (13) 2.08 (15.1) 2.80 (20.32) 2.90 (21.04) 13.78 14.25 16.5 Total (Figures in parenthesis show the % spent time) 3.75 (23.0) 2.0 (12.23) 2.90 (17.73) 16.35 3.50 (21.8) 2.30 (14.33) 2.75 (17.13) 16.05 3.0 (19.70) 0 (16.4) 2.30 (14.84) 15.45 (18.5) 1.2 (8.6) 1.0 (7.3) 14.0 3.5 (22) (16) 2.0 (12) 15.9 3.5 (21.2) 3.0 (18.3) (15) 16.5 4.0 (23) 3.5 (20.3) 2.8 (16.5) 17.3 ISSN 1023 2001 www.ivcs.org.uk/ijrs Article 1 Page 9 of 9