RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a Proposed Mixed-use Development at 400 Windmill Road

Similar documents
RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for the Proposed Fall River South Development

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for the newly proposed Fall River South Development

ALBION FLATS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS

January 17, Ron Waldthausen Platte Valley LLC 1378 Promontory Bluff View Colorado Springs, CO 80921

City of Ottawa 2017 TIA Guidelines Date 4-Oct-17 TIA Screening Form Project 851 Industrial Avenue Project Number Results of Screening

Traffic Impact Study Guidelines. City of Guelph

DIVISION I TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES ENGINEERING STANDARDS

Kris Haynes, C.Tech Project Manager - Ottawa Monarch Corporation. cc Steno jcd

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT

CITY OF LETHBRIDGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

3.6 GROUND TRANSPORTATION

Strasburg Road Extension Rush Meadow Street to New Dundee Road Alternative Route Study Report

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES

Traffic Impact Study Requirements

A Probabilistic Approach to Defining Freeway Capacity and Breakdown

Shannon Noonan, City of Cambridge Don Drackley, IBI Group Scott Johnson, IBI Group PTSL

Technical Memorandum. 720 SW Washington Suite 500 Portland, OR dksassociates.com. DATE: July 12, 2017

Final Air Quality Report

Future Build Alternative Traffic Forecasts and Level of Service Analysis

HALDIMAND COUNTY DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION T TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 11. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 1. TRAFFIC

Transportation and Works Department The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 6Z1

GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

22 September 2016 OUR REF:

Public Works Department -

SITE AREA AERIAL PHOTO

CITY OF MARIANNA MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 936 Marianna, FL (850)

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Town of Queen Creek

UPTOWN TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Re: Item No Port Wallace Master Infrastructure Study, Urban Service Area Expansion & Plan Amendment Request (Case 21601)

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSISGUIDELINES

January 16, Rhode Island Energy Facilities Siting Board 89 Jefferson Boulevard Warwick, Rhode Island 02888

Rivers Edge Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Traffic Study

FOREST LAWN MEMORIAL PARK HOLLYWOOD HILLS MASTER PLAN TRIP GENERATION ASSESSMENT

Memorandum. 921 SW Washington Street, Suite 468, Portland, OR tel fax

Woodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report

City of Palo Alto (ID # 7047) City Council Staff Report

Article 16 Traffic Impact Analysis

Welcome to the Public Information Centre. Red Hill Business Park South Transportation Master Plan Addendum. June 25, :00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Dated: January 2015 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

DC Engineers, Inc. January 18, Mr. Seth Gadinsky Gadinsky Real Estate, LLC 1680 Michigan Avenue, Suite 1001 Miami Beach, Florida 33139

VIII. LAND USE ISSUES

Calibration of a Micro-Simulation Model in a Large Urban Network

1.0 Introduction Traffic Study Overview Study Area Overview of Senate Bill

TOWN OF MOORESVILLE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL TOWN OF MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (ZONING PETITIONS)

BCEO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

Quantifying the performance of a traffic data collection system: Scout Connect match rate evaluation

CITY OF CLOVIS Traffic Impact Study Guidelines

PORT OF FERNANDINA TRUCK CIRCULATION STUDY

Environmental Consequences and Mitigation

Transit Service Guidelines

CITY OF VALLEJO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT Analysis/Study GUIDELINES

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

4.12 Public and Emergency Services

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT KAMLOOPS RESOURCE RECOVERY CENTRE REVIEW OF ACCESS OPTIONS

Appendix O Level of Service Standard and Measurements

OFFICIAL MUNICIPALITY OF MURRYSVILLE, WESTMORELAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO. -16

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Demand Reduction Assumptions Used For Travel Demand Analysis of EIS Alternatives

Date: May 4, Clare M. Look-Jaeger, P.E. Kevin C. Jaeger Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Weingart Projects Construction Traffic Analysis

I-90 ALLSTON INTERCHANGE

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES

Appendix B Highway 407 Interchange Review - Cochrane Street Area

LANDSIDE FACILITIES AIRLINE TERMINAL FACILITIES INVENTORY 5.0 INTRODUCTION C H A P T E R 1 CHAPTER 5

M D 355 [FR E D E R IC K R O A D] OVER

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

McTAVISH ROAD INTERCHANGE A ROUNDABOUT SOLUTION. Tim Blackburn, P.Eng., Urban Systems Ltd.

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies

DRAFT. SR-60 7 th Avenue Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) I-605 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) I-605/SR-60 EA# 3101U0

Countdown Hawera Proposed Supermarket Redevelopment

Clair-Maltby. Mobility Study Work Plan. Prepared by: BA Group. Transform. Connect. Community.

MD 5 Great Mills Improvement Project

CITY OF DRAPER TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DESIGN GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 2: MODELING METHODOLOGY

Chapter 6 Freight Plan

Final Air Quality Report

TENW MEMORANDUM. Project Description. Trip Generation

City of Menifee. Public Works Department. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Markham Centre Transportation Study Update

Appendix 1. Problem Identification for MoTI Business Cases

Mayor Savage and Members of Halifax Regional Council. Original Signed

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Land Use Intensity Daily Total In Out Total In Out. Shopping Center 236,160 SF

LAS VEGAS STREET RAILROAD CROSSING RR/PUC CONNECTION AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN

Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA. Abstract

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 3 Existing Facilities & System Performance

ROUTE 13G THOMPSON RUN EXPRESS

CITY OF THOROLD GUIDELINES FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES

APPENDIX D ACCESS MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 2 - TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DEVELOPMENT

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council March 27, 2018

Arterial Connector Study Adoption Considerations

City of Brantford Chapter 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 8: I-71 ACCESS IMPROVEMNETS

7 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS FOR REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 3 (ROPA 3) IN MARKHAM

Proposal for a Transportation Impact Analysis of the Castilleja School project in Palo Alto

Transcription:

James J. Copeland, P.Eng. GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 June 27, 2016 Stephanie Nowe-Morris, NSAA LEED AP SNMArchitect Limited 27 DeWolfe Court Bedford, NS B4A 3N7 RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a Proposed Mixed-use Development at 400 Windmill Road Dear Ms. Nowe-Morris: INTRODUCTION At the request of SNMArchitect Limited, the GRIFFIN transportation group inc. has carried out a qualitative Stage 1 - Traffic Impact Assessment in support of the planning application process for a proposed mixed-use development located at civic #400 Windmill Road (PID #000663131, 000663149, and 000663156) in the community of north Dartmouth, Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM). The proposed development will be comprised of two multi-story buildings that will contain general commercial office space (17,450 ft 2 ) as well as 72 residential apartment units. The subject lands are generally located between Nootka Avenue and Fernhill Drive, on the east side of Windmill Road. The total area of the consolidated properties measures about 1.38 acres and is currently occupied by the Ship Victory Beverage Room. The subject properties are located in the HRM Urban Service Area, that is within the Dartmouth By-law area. The traffic impact assessment associated with the proposed residential development is discussed in the following Sections. The site context is generally illustrated in Figure 1 and the proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. STUDY AREA AND SITE CONEXT Windmill Road is generally aligned in a north-south direction with a three-lane urban cross-section (one travel lane in each direction plus centre left turn lanes. It is under the jurisdiction of the HRM and appears to function as a minor arterial street that connects downtown Dartmouth to the south with the Burnside Industrial Park area to the north.

Nootka Ave Windmill Road Civic #400 Existing North Access Existing South Access Fern Hill Dr Source: Bing Maps wwww.griffininc.ca Study Area and Site Context Figure 1

Existing South Access Location (to be closed) North Access New South Access Windmill Rd Source: SNMArchitects www.griffininc.ca Proposed Site Plan Figure 2

There are two existing accesses serving vehicular traffic entering/exiting the Ship Victory Beverage Room. It is understood that these two accesses are located within a Nova Scotia Power Corporation utility easement which forms the north boundary of the subject lands. As shown in Figure 2, the proposed development will continue to be served by two vehicular accesses. The existing north access will remain while the south access will shift slightly to the south. EXISTING TRAFFIC CON DITIONS Since the proposed development will have a mix of both residential and commercial office land use types, and that the Windmill Road corridor accommodates weekday commuter traffic demands, it seemed reasonable to assume the highest overall study area volumes would occur during the weekday morning and afternoon peak periods. Therefore, these two peak times were selected and used in this assessment. A site visit and data collection effort was carried out on Wednesday April 27 th, 2016 to measure sight lines, observe traffic volumes, measure vehicle operating speeds and so forth. In addition, representatives of HRM Traffic Management were contacted to obtain their most recent traffic volume data. HRM provided historical traffic data from their on-going traffic data collection program which was recorded in the vicinity of Nootka Avenue. These data are contained in Table 1. Table 1: Windmill Road Historical Traffic Volumes (Average Weekday Peak Hours) AM Peak (vph) PM Peak (vph) Southbound Northbound Two-way Southbound Northbound Two-way July 2010 552 387 939 548 557 1105 June 2012 461 473 934 536 589 1125 vph vehicles per hour As shown in Table 1, there is very little change in the two-way traffic volumes between the 2010 and 2012 data sets and it was therefore assumed there has been little to no traffic growth in this corridor in the recent past. This is typical of roadways in established areas such as this. It is also interesting to note that the peak travel direction during peak times is relatively even between the northbound and southbound directions, particularly during the weekday afternoon peak. Considering the peak period volumes shown in Table 1 and the capacity provided by the threelane cross-section (i.e. one travel lane in each direction plus a centre left turn lane) it appears there is residual capacity available in the Windmill Road corridor to accommodate some future traffic growth. 400 Windmill Road Mixed-use Development Page 4 Traffic Impact Statement

SIGHTLINE REVIEW The driver sight line review was based on the guidelines contained in the Transportation Association of Canada s (TAC) Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads. These guidelines use design speed for determining criteria such as minimum stopping sight distance (SSD). The design speed is associated with a range of vehicle operating speeds on the major roadway. It should be noted that the regulatory posted speed limit along Windmill Road is 50 km/h. During the site visit, the consultant team measured operating speeds (85 th percentile speed) in both directions along Windmill Road. The survey results showed that operating speeds were 56 and 59 km/h for the northbound and southbound directions, respectively. As such, a 60 km/h operating speed was applied to this analysis and the minimum required SSD for this operating speed is 85m. The available sightlines were measured from the proposed south vehicle access location since this appeared to be the critical location having reduced sightlines to the south along Windmill Road. Available sightlines to the south were measured to be about 90m and available sightlines to the north were greater than 100m both exceeding the minimum requirement. It was concluded that the existing driver sightlines to/from both the proposed north and south access locations meet or exceed minimum design guidelines for drivers moving to and from the proposed development, given the expected vehicle operating speeds. The observed sight lines are provided in Figure 3. Figure 3: Sight lines from the proposed north driveway on Windmill Road Looking south along Windmill Road Looking north along Windmill Road 400 Windmill Road Mixed-use Development Page 5 Traffic Impact Statement

SITE TRIP GENERATION In order to assess the change in traffic volumes on the study area streets under future conditions, there was a need to determine the number of new vehicles that would be entering and exiting the proposed development. This is referred to as the trip generation calculation process. Typically, traffic engineers use trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) to forecast site-generated volumes for specific land use types, if deemed appropriate. Based on our review of the land use types being proposed it was determined that the ITE trip generation rates for both residential apartment units and general office space were appropriate. As such, ITE s Trip Generation, 9 th Edition document was used and the forecast site-generated trips are summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Site Trip Generation for the Proposed Residential Development Trip Rate Vehicle Trips / Hour In Out Total Size AM Peak Hour Apartment (220) 72 units 0.51/unit 7 30 37 General Office (710) 17,450 ft 2 1.56/1,000ft 2 24 3 27 AM Peak Total - - 31 33 64 PM Peak Hour Apartment (220) 72 units 0.62/unit 29 16 45 General Office (710) 17,450 ft 2 1.49/1,000ft 2 4 22 26 PM Peak Total - - 33 38 71 In summary, the proposed mixed-use development is expected to generate 64 trips/hour (31 inbound and 33 outbound) during the weekday morning peak period and 71 trips/hour (33 inbound and 38 outbound) during the weekday afternoon peak period. This generally equates to about one vehicle trip every minute during peak times of the day. All of these trips will be added to the Windmill Road corridor, yet will be further dispersed to the north and south depending on the driver s destination. 400 Windmill Road Mixed-use Development Page 6 Traffic Impact Statement

TRAFFIC IMPACTS ON SURROUNDING STREETS The qualitative assessment of the current traffic operational conditions on Windmill Road and the study area intersections was carried out during the field review. As discussed earlier in this letter the peak period traffic volumes observed using the Windmill Road corridor appear to be below the capacity for this type of street and there were minimal delay times observed for drivers entering the Windmill Road corridor traffic stream from side streets and accesses. In addition, the forecast site-generated traffic for a proposed 72 apartment unit and 17,450 ft 2 office space development is expected to generate an additional vehicle trip per minute during peak times of a typical weekday. It is expected these new vehicle trips can be accommodated in the Windmill Road corridor with only a marginal impact on traffic operations. FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions were gleaned from the qualitative traffic impact assessment of the proposed mixed-use development located 400 Windmill Road: The recently recorded peak hour traffic demand using Windmill Road was about 950 vph during the morning peak and about 1,150 vph during the afternoon peak (two-way volumes). This equates to an approximate daily average of 10,000-12,000 vehicles/day which is well below the capacity of a minor arterial/major collector street with a threelane cross-section. The proposed mixed-use development will be comprised of 72 residential apartment units and 17,450 ft 2 of general office space and is expected to generate 64 trips/hour (31 inbound and 33 outbound) during the weekday morning peak period and 71 trips/hour (33 inbound and 38 outbound) during the weekday afternoon peak period. The qualitative traffic operational assessment suggests there is residual capacity on the study area street system. It appears the new traffic volumes generated by the proposed development are expected to have a negligible impact on traffic operations along Windmill Road corridor. The driver sight lines measured from the critical location of the proposed south access location meet or exceed the 85m minimum stopping sight distance requirement. This minimum requirement is based on free flow 85 th percentile vehicle speeds observed to be 56 km/h in the northbound direction and 59 km/h in the southbound direction. In summary, the traffic generated by the proposed mixed-use development is expected to have a negligible and acceptable level of impact on the traffic operating conditions along Windmill Road. Based on the analysis findings and conclusions the following steps are recommended: 400 Windmill Road Mixed-use Development Page 7 Traffic Impact Statement

Original Signed Original Signed