NATIONAL. Urban Development Institute of Australia NATIONAL POLICY AGENDA

Similar documents
URBAN DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA (WESTERN AUSTRALIA)

RE: State Infrastructure Plan

Submission in response to: New South Wales Draft Climate Change Strategic Plan and. Draft Plan to Save Energy and Money

Urban Development Institute of Australia Western Australian Division Incorporated

11.0 Energy. Summary Energy snapshot

ACTION PLAN FOR ENDURING PROSPERITY. Planning for population and cities

ACCOUNTING EMPLOYMENT MARKET UPDATE JUNE - SEPTEMBER 2016

Making Western Sydney Greater

HUMAN RESOURCES EMPLOYMENT MARKET UPDATE JUNE - DECEMBER 2016

Reforming and Harmonising the NSW Energy Savings Scheme

Western Australia electricity price trends

In advance of the Western Australian Government s Budget

Gearing Up: Business Readiness for Climate Change

CONSULTATION: DRAFT NATIONAL AIRPORTS SAFEGUARDING FRAMEWORK

Michael Kilgariff Speech to the Queensland Infrastructure Summit Tuesday 8 December 2015

Queensland Freight Strategy

Social Services Investment Framework

VALUE CAPTURE FUNDING AND INTEGRATED PLANNING

BUILDING BLOCKS UDIA NSW 2018

This process of in-depth member engagement made the following issues very clear:

8 February LGA Review Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries PO Box 8349 Perth Business Centre Western Australia 6849

Trade Supply Chain. Developing Rail and Sea Access. Peter Keyte PBPL

National Catholic Education Commission. NCEC Position Paper. Reform of the Federation White Paper

National Transport Commission Submission to Infrastructure Victoria

Volunteer Management Activity Review Summary of feedback Public workshops, February May 2018

SUBMISSION ON THE STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FOR SOUTH AUSTRALIA

AUSTRALASIAN RAILWAY ASSOCIATION SUBMISSION

Urban Water Sector. Wendy Craik - Commissioner. Productivity Commission Economic & Social Outlook Conference Melbourne 1 July 2011

Red Tape Survey October 2008

Business Case for Modernising Local Government in Buckinghamshire

Speech by Michael Kilgariff Supply Chain Management Conference Tuesday 24 May 2016

NSW Standing Committee on State Development. Inquiry into Skills Shortages in Rural and Regional NSW

National Farmers Federation

Managing Legislative Risk

Some highlights of the Victoria study include: A large untapped resource: The modelling results show strong growth in

Submission to. The Department of Communications. Telecommunications Infrastructure. In New Developments

GCSE ECONOMICS 8136/2

UDIA NSW RESPONSE TO. Greater Macarthur Land Release Investigation

on the Vocational Education and Training Fee and Funding Review

Scope s Submission to the Stronger Community Organisations Project

UDIA (Qld) Key Performance Indicators for Local Planning Schemes

Reforming the East Coast gas market

FIVE WAYS CONGRESS CAN IMPROVE THE U.S. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM

50 YOUNG PEOPLE IN STICKING TOGETHER PROJECT COMPARED TO JOBACTIVE CONTROL GROUP

ADVOCACY PLAN

Industry Engagement in Training Package Development. Discussion Paper Towards a Contestable Model

VALUE CAPTURE DISCUSSION PAPER HOW CAN WE MAKE BETTER USE OF VALUE CAPTURE?

A New Approach. a hand up for apprentices

Achieving High Performance in Internal Audit

Emerging challenges and opportunities to secure our water future

Emerging challenges and opportunities to secure our water future

Pre-Budget Submission

SUPPORTING VULNERABLE ENERGY CUSTOMERS

Regulatory reform to enhance efficiency & effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment

Perth and Peel Green Growth Plan for 3.5 million. UDIA Submission

Great Expectations Understanding changing employment conditions. Conrad Liveris +61 (0)

Transformation Briefing for the Minister of Revenue. November 2017

Enabling the development of industrial capacity: Resource corridors, clusters and SEZs

Making use of Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning (PPS12)

2015 CPSU/CSA POLICY CONFERENCE GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT

Shopping through gritted teeth Retail Forecasts August 2017 Public Executive Summary

Evaluating Many Rivers Microenterprise Development Program

STRATEGIC PLAN ACCESSIBLE RELEVANT RIGHT NOW

CEMENT CONCRETE & AGGREGATES AUSTRALIA

NECA response to Quality of VET in Assessment. Discussion Paper

Domestic Onshore Option for Timor Sea Gas: Analysis of Implications for Australia. A Report to the Northern Territory Government

NSW Industry Action Plan - Manufacturing

SUBMISSION AGRICULTURAL COMPETITION GREEN PAPER

Energy, Fuel Poverty and Climate Change

Electricity Market Design Principles

Action Plan for a New Local Governance System in New Brunswick

SME BUSINESS EFFICIENCY REPORT

OUTCOMES: RESEARCH INTO PRACTICE. National Outcomes Measurement Research Agenda Working Paper No. 2

Better Water Infrastructure Australia needs engineers to future-proof water infrastructure

Bus Industry Confederation Response to COAG Road Reform Plan Funding and Implementation Issues Paper. Submission by the Bus Industry Confederation

Program impact report The sections highlighted in red indicate what has changed in 2018

Australian Hotels Association

GETTING THE SUPPLY CHAIN RIGHT

Mapping the Australian regulatory environment: Implications for construction firms

CARBON NEUTRAL STRATEGY ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Chartered Institute of Management Accountants Public Private Partnerships

Bord Gáis Éireann. Response to CER Strategic Plan

South Australian Energy Transformation RIT-T: Project Specification Consultation Report and Market Modelling Approach and Assumptions Report

Demand based network tariffs offering a new choice

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY QUEENSLAND SUBMISSION

to the NSW Government s Budget

South Australia s business community is paying the price for a grid that is no longer fit for purpose.

International Seminar on Strengthening Public Investment and Managing Fiscal Risks from Public-Private Partnerships

Dear Review Secretariat COMPETITION POLICY REVIEW DRAFT REPORT

City of Melville Car Parking Strategy

Corporate Plan Metropolitan Borough Council

The Contribution of NSW Community Service Organisations

For immediate release: 30 October 2012

The New Towns Act 1981 (Local Authority Oversight) Regulations

PRINCE REGENT NATIONAL PARK

Yours sincerely, Danni Addison Chief Executive Officer Urban Development Institute of Australia (Victoria)

Business Plan

STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS

environmental defender s office new south wales

DORSET PROCUREMENT. Procurement Strategy

Transcription:

NATIONAL Urban Development Institute of Australia NATIONAL POLICY AGENDA

AUSTRALIA S DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRY IN BRIEF ALTHOUGH MANY MAY NOT REALISE IT, URBAN DEVELOPMENT IS AN ACTIVITY THAT HAS WIDE REACHING IMPACTS ON ALL THOSE LIVING IN CITIES AND TOWNS ACROSS THE COUNTRY. MORE THAN SIMPLY SHIFTING EARTH AND STACKING BRICKS, OUR INDUSTRY SHAPES THE VERY WAY OUR CITIES LOOK, FEEL, AND FUNCTION. AT ITS MOST FUNDAMENTAL LEVEL, URBAN DEVELOPMENT IS ABOUT CREATING THE COMMUNITIES WHICH THE MAJORITY OF AUSTRALIANS LIVE AND WORK IN EVERY DAY. It is also a critical component of the Australian economy, with urban development directly generating approximately 7.3% of Australian GDP. Our industry employs almost one in ten Australian workers, over 975,000 jobs, and provides Governments at all levels with approximately $30 billion in tax revenue 1. The Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA) is the voice of Australia s development industry, representing the entire spectrum of professionals involved in urban development around the country. We strive to ensure the future prosperity of the development industry, recognising that the prosperity of our nation is dependent on our success in creating vibrant, productive and liveable communities, now and for future generations. INTRODUCTION Australia has historically been a place of wealth and ample land, where ordinary people could aspire to the satisfaction of one day, affording their own home. Affordable home ownership has for decades provided individuals with security, stability, and a sense of connectedness to their community. Unfortunately, this long revered facet of modern Australian life is increasingly a fading dream for many. A chronic shortage of land and housing, along with increasing taxes and charges, has resulted in rapidly escalating prices, putting home ownership increasingly out of reach for many ordinary Australians. But this need not be the case. Governments have the power to reverse this troubling trend by working to remove the barriers constraining the supply of new land and housing. In doing so, they can not only improve access to one of life s most basic necessities, affordable shelter, but also create new jobs, greater economic prosperity, and raise the quality of life in our cities and towns. 1 Property Insights, The Property Development Industry Economic Impact Study, March 2010 UDIA National Policy Agenda 2

This document provides the Urban Development Institute of Australia s (UDIA) overarching policy solutions to Australia s growing housing problem. It looks at the many barriers to supplying new homes, and outlines what governments must do to create long lasting solutions. UDIA is confident that effective cooperation and collaboration between all levels of government to implement the policies outlined in this document will help create a more prosperous future, not just for the development industry, but for the entire Australian community. Cameron Shephard UDIA National President Martin Wells UDIA NSW President Paul Lakey UDIA WA President Brett Gillan UDIA QLD President David Payes UDIA Vic President Mark Gardiner UDIA SA President Kerry Osborne UDIA NT President UDIA National Policy Agenda 3

Governments have the power to improve housing affordability by working to remove the barriers constraining the supply of new land and housing

PLANNING FOR POPULATION GROWTH AND CHANGE To fully realise the benefits of our growing population The Australian community has benefited from a growing population for hundreds of years, during which time our wealth and standard of living has increased immensely. It is likely that Australia s population will continue to grow well into the future, with the Australian Bureau of Statistics projecting that our population will approximately double over the next 50 years, with most growth occurring in our capital cities. Given the inevitability of a growing population, it is up to governments to ensure that the opportunities population growth presents are fully realised. When managed well, population growth can be a boon for both the economy and existing residents. Population growth enlarges the labour force to support businesses and helps offset Australia s aging workforce, whilst the new skills and abilities new workers bring help improve economic productivity and innovation. However realising these benefits requires all levels of government to cooperate to ensure that there is adequate investment in new urban infrastructure such as roads, public transport, utilities and community facilities, to support population growth. Failure to invest will worsen capacity constraints, drag on productivity, and increase the amount of time and money lost to congestion. URBAN LAND SUPPLY Equally important is addressing the housing needs of our growing community by ensuring a ready supply of land for development across our urban areas. Unfortunately urban land supply has been heavily constrained in most major cities, which has contributed to rising prices, worsening affordability, and an undersupply of new housing. State governments need to identify new land for release well before it is needed, and improve the flexibility and responsiveness of land supply to changing market conditions. This will help create a balanced supply of new land to support our growing population, simultaneously supporting jobs, addressing affordability concerns and allowing more Australians to realise the dream of home ownership. Restrictive land supply is having a major impact on the price of land. Lot prices in Australia s 5 largest cities increased by 78% over the decade to 2013 Lot sizes declined by 29% over the same period 2014 UDIA State of the Land Report TO ENSURE AUSTRALIA REALISES THE BENEFITS OF OUR GROWING POPULATION, STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS SHOULD: Identify population growth trends through the use of regular growth forecasts. Actively use population growth forecasts to underpin comprehensive strategic plans for increasing urban infrastructure investment, and improve land-use planning and land supply. Ensure that sufficient resources are available across different levels of government to implement strategic land use and infrastructure plans over the short, medium and long term. UDIA National Policy Agenda 5

PROVIDING INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT URBAN GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY To improve access to opportunity, and the quality of life in our cities Urban infrastructure provides the fundamental framework that allows modern societies to operate, underpinning both economic productivity and the quality of life in our major cities. Good quality infrastructure networks such as roads, public transport systems, and utilities, provide businesses with access to markets and labour, and individuals with access to opportunities such as jobs and education. Providing good infrastructure to new areas as our communities grow is particularly important, as it helps ensure that there is a ready supply of affordable land suitable for new housing, and that new households have the same access to opportunities as other parts of the community. Unfortunately the provision of key urban infrastructure has struggled to keep up with strong growth in the Australian economy and population in recent years, resulting in a large and growing infrastructure gap. This manifests itself in growing congestion, flagging productivity, and housing shortages, which are putting both the economic productivity and the quality of life in our major urban areas at risk. It is up to governments at all levels to work together to address Australia s infrastructure problems. SUFFICIENT FUNDING AND VALUE FOR MONEY INVESTMENT Critical to reducing Australia s infrastructure gap is ensuring that funding is readily available for new investment. In the past, Governments were largely responsible for funding infrastructure, however there has been an increasing reliance on the private sector to fund infrastructure in recent years. One of the ways this has occurred is through growing upfront fees applied to new homes, variously referred to as developer levies, charges, or contributions, and justified on the grounds that new home owners should pay for infrastructure that they benefit from exclusively. In practice, these charges have been used by governments as a way to shift the cost of providing broader community infrastructure and services to new home buyers. Developer levies can add considerably to the cost of a typical new home: $44,000 in Sydney $27,000 in Brisbane $22,000 in Perth $11,000 in Melbourne $4,000 in Adelaide -Urbis National Dwelling Cost Study 2011 UDIA National Policy Agenda 6

Governments must recognise that continued reliance on up front developer levies for funding infrastructure is unsustainable, as they damage new housing supply and affordability, and unfairly and inequitably disadvantage new home buyers. It is likely that both state and federal budgets will face ongoing constraints, so it will be important for governments to pursue a range of non-traditional methods to fund new infrastructure, including: Public Private Partnerships Tax Increment Financing Bonds and special purpose debt vehicles Retail and Institutional investment Asset Sales Tax incentives and credit enhancement With limited funding available, it is also crucial that governments get good value for money when investing in infrastructure, and that the right infrastructure is selected to maximise the return to the Australian community. TO ENSURE SUFFICIENT AND EQUITABLE FUNDING AND PROVISION OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS SHOULD: Reduce their reliance on up front developer charges, by investigating alternative funding options, particularly those that distribute the cost of infrastructure amongst beneficiaries, and over long timeframes. Create long term plans to provide the infrastructure necessary for urban growth, and budget for those plans. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD: Ensure that infrastructure investment decisions are subject to rigorous and comprehensive cost benefit analysis, to ensure the greatest value for money on new projects. Further investigate non-traditional methods of funding infrastructure, to increase the level of funding available for investment at both a federal and state level. Both state and federal governments must make sure that their infrastructure selection decisions are objectively based, with rigorous cost benefit analysis undertaken to ensure that a particular project is the best, most efficient solution to a given problem. UDIA National Policy Agenda 7

REDUCING RED TAPE FOR A STRONGER, MORE RESILIENT ECONOMY Supporting jobs by supporting business Regulation of urban development through planning, assessment and approvals systems is a necessity to ensure sustainable social, economic, and environmental outcomes in our communities. However, all too often the end goal is lost amongst layers and layers of red tape, delays, and uncertainty, which unnecessarily tie up government resources and increase costs for businesses. Governments must focus on improving regulation and reducing red tape, to create a stronger economy, whilst still protecting environmental outcomes and community values. At the state and local government level, long delays, and uncertainty needlessly hold back development, the supply of new housing, and increase the cost of doing business. The Productivity Commission s 2011 report on Planning, Zoning, and Development Assessment found that across Australia s five largest cities, it could take as long as ten years from the commencement of rezoning for a subdivision to gain planning approval. In addition to severely delaying housing supply and creating a system that is inflexible and unresponsive to changes in market conditions, such long timeframes create enormous holding costs which must be built into the cost of new housing. Planning and development processes desperately need to be streamlined and simplified to reduce delays and uncertainty, supporting jobs, businesses and new housing supply. At the federal level, duplication and lack of coordination with state government processes has been a key contributor to red tape. In particular, the implementation of environmental legislation under the EPBC Act has created unnecessary delays and duplication of processes between state and federal systems, creating additional costs for businesses and the community without necessarily improving environmental outcomes. Recent reforms to the EPBC Act have resulted in considerable progress towards reducing duplication between state and Federal environmental legislation. The Federal Government should continue to streamline the assessment and approvals process under the EPBC Act. TO REDUCE RED TAPE AND SUPPORT BUSINESSES AND JOBS, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS SHOULD: Undertake planning system reform to reduce delays and increase certainty in planning, zoning, assessment, and approval systems, and increase the flexibility with which they operate. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD: Ensure that all levels of government cooperate and coordinate their regulatory activities to identify best practice, standardise regulations where possible, and avoid conflicting legislation, to create certainty. Work to reduce duplication with state and local government processes, including continuing to streamline federal and state environmental assessment and approval systems. UDIA National Policy Agenda 8

CREATING A FAIRER AND MORE EFFICIENT TAX SYSTEM Reducing inequitable and inefficient taxes on new housing Whilst taxes are essential to fund the government services our communities depend on, inefficient and inequitable taxes unnecessarily damage economic activity and disadvantage certain parts of the community. The housing and development industries are some of the most highly taxed sectors in the Australian economy, accounting for over 40% of state and local government revenue, and 12% across all tiers of government 2. The high level of taxation on new housing in particular damages housing supply and job creation by rendering some projects unviable, and flows through to the cost of new housing, damaging affordability. Taxes levied on housing and development are also some of the most inefficient and economically damaging in the Australian economy. Stamp duty in particular is a highly distortive tax which, when levied on property, limits labour mobility, housing turnover, and penalises households for moving to properties that best suit their needs. This will be increasingly costly for society as Australia s aging population necessitates household downsizing for older generations. Stamp duties are also a highly unreliable source of revenue for state governments, as they rely on the volume of property transactions, which are highly variable. Whilst providing a boost in heated property markets, in slow markets with fewer transactions, lower stamp duty receipts hit state government budgets. A more reliable source of revenue is needed. UDIA believes that stamp duties should be gradually phased out in favour of more efficient taxes, such as broadening of the GST. This view was reiterated by the Henry Tax Review in 2010, which emphatically stated that there is no place for stamp duty in a modern Australian Tax system and recommended the Commonwealth Government facilitate the transition to less costly and more equitable taxes. TO CREATE A MORE EFFICIENT TAX SYSTEM, STATE GOVERNMENTS SHOULD: Reduce their reliance on inefficient, narrow based taxes such as stamp duty in favour of broad based, efficient taxes such as consumption taxes. Reduce the use of inequitable and excessive up front charges and developer levies to raise revenue. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD: Assist state governments with phasing out stamp duty by broadening the base of the GST. Include state and local government levies in GST cost base calculations to improve the integrity of the tax system and reduce the incidence of double taxation. 2 Centre for International Economics, Taxation of the Housing Sector, 2011 UDIA National Policy Agenda 9

For further information about UDIA and our activities please contact: UDIA NATIONAL T 02 6230 0255 W www.udia.com.au UDIA NEW SOUTH WALES T 02 9262 1214 W www.udiansw.com.au UDIA QUEENSLAND T 07 3229 1589 W www.udiaqld.com.au UDIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA T 08 8359 3000 W www.udiasa.com.au UDIA VICTORIA T 03 9832 9600 W www.udiavic.com.au UDIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA T 08 9215 3400 W www.udiawa.com.au UDIA NORTHERN TERRITORY T 08 8943 9977 W www.udiant.com.au UDIA NATIONAL CONGRESS W www.udiacongress.com.au