Making Beef Out of Dairy

Similar documents
2003 Spring Indiana Beef Evaluation and Economics Feeding Program

Indiana Beef Evaluation and Economics Feeding Program

FACTORS INFLUENCING PROFITABILITY OF FEEDLOT STEERS

FEEDLOT AND CARCASS DATA: MAKING CENTS AND MAKING DECISIONS

Indiana Beef Evaluation and Economics Feeding Program

Beef & sheep business management

Using Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection

Beef & sheep business management

Indiana Beef Evaluation and Economics Feeding Program

A Seven Year Summary of Feeding Cull Market Cows

WHETHER dealing with a commercial

Traits of Cattle That Hit the Quality Target Gary D. Fike Feedlot Specialist Certified Angus Beef LLC

Goal Oriented Use of Genetic Prediction

Breeding Objectives Indicate Value of Genomics for Beef Cattle M. D. MacNeil, Delta G

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits Among Various Three-Breed Cross Calves

Effect of Angus and Charolais Sires with Early vs Normal Weaned Calves on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics

Effective Use Of EPDs. Presented to: Minnesota Beef Producers Presented by: Kris A. Ringwall, Ph. D. NDSU Extension Beef Specialist

Utah State University Ranch to Rail Summary Report

Application of Carcass Ultrasound in Beef Production. T. Dean Pringle Animal and Dairy Science University of Georgia

Understanding Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report

Performance and Economic Analysis of Calf-Fed and Yearling Systems for Fall-Born Calves

A Summary of Feeding Market Cows for the White Fat Cow Market

Amazing times For years. Using the Missouri Recipe for Hitting the Quality Target. Today. Amazing times For years

Nichols Farms. Angus 8/12. Private Treaty Bull Sale 64 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics

Factors Affecting Lot Low Choice and Above and Lot Premium Choice Acceptance Rate of Beef Calves in the Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity Program

Value-Based Marketing for Feeder Cattle. By Tom Brink, Top Dollar Angus, Inc.

Consideration of Weaning Time, Implanting Strategies and Carcass Data on Cow-Calf Decisions

Jane Parish Extension Beef Cattle Specialist, Mississippi State University

University of Florida Presentation. By: Jerry Bohn

Understanding and Utilizing EPDs to Select Bulls

The Big Picture: Road ahead for the cattle business

EPD Info 1/5. Guide to the American Gelbvieh Association Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

Impacts of Crossbreeding on Profitability in Vertically Coordinated Beef Industry Marketing Systems

Do EPDs Work? 6/2/17. Tom Brink, Red Angus Association of America BIF Symposium, Athens, Ga. 1. Field Testing $Beef in Purebred Angus Cattle

What Value Looks Like to a Feedyard. By Tom Brink

Iowa 4-H Beef Carcass Summary

Comparing Iowa 4-H Beef Carcass Programs with the 2016 National Beef Quality Audit Carcasses

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

Performance of SE Cattle When Placed on Feed. Gary D. Fike Beef Cattle Specialist Certified Angus Beef LLC Manhattan, KS

An evaluation of genetic trends over 10 year period from data collected from the ABBA carcass evaluation program. Background

Pregnancies for Profit. Beef x Dairy Sires

Nichols Farms. Angus. Private Treaty Bull Sale 65 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics 4/25/18

FUNDAMENTALS. Feeder Calf Grading. Jason Duggin and Lawton Stewart, Beef Extension Specialists.

Maternal Versus Terminal Crossbreeding Systems: A Six-Year Study at University of Nevada Gund Research and Demonstration Ranch

Market specifications for beef cattle

Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

Feeder Calf Grading Fundamentals

Which dog do you want to be?

UNIT 6 UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESS FOR PRODUCING, BREEDING, AND MARKETING AGRICULTURE ANIMALS

Strategies for Optimizing Value of Finished Cattle in Value-Based Marketing Grids

More cattle are being marketed on carcass. Selection for Carcass Merit. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle IX: Genetics of Carcass Merit

Heterosis and Breed Effects for Beef Traits of Brahman Purebred and Crossbred Steers

Enhancing End Product

Ranch to Rail Summary Report

Influence of Cow BCS and Late Gestation Supplementation: Effects on Cow and Calf Performance 1

Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting

Ultrasound feedlot sorting. Evaluation of feedlot sorting system using ultrasound and computer technology

Spotted Profits VS. Solid Profits Jessica Leetch AGEC 4960 March 1, 2010

Using EPDs in a Commercial Herd

WAGYU BREEDOBJECT $INDEXES TECHNICAL UPDATE

An integrated approach to expand marketing. producers from value-added heifers and steers

BEEF South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 2. South Dakota State University, Rapid City, SD 3

Selecting and Sourcing Replacement Heifers

Creating Premium Beef Maximizing Dairy Profit

Proceedings, State of Beef Conference November 7 and 8, 2018, North Platte, Nebraska COW SIZE AND COWHERD EFFICIENCY. Introduction

Why Do They Discount My Heifers So Much? T.A. Thrift and J. Savell University of Florida

Breeding for Carcass Improvement

Impact of Selection for Improved Feed Efficiency. Phillip Lancaster UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center

Sample Direct Market Beef

EFFECT OF SIRE BREED ON STEER PERFORMANCE, CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS, BOXED BEEF YIELDS AND MEAT TENDERNESS

Veterinary Science. Beef Unit Handouts

Effects of a High-linoleic Sunflower Seed Supplement on Performance and Reproduction of Primiparous Beef Cows and their Calves

Investigating New Marketing Options to Increase Beef Production in Ontario

HOW DO I PROFIT FROM REPRODUCTION? HITTING THE TARGET FOR HIGH-QUALITY PRODUCT. L.R. Corah. Certified Angus Beef LLC Manhattan, KS.

1999 American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting

Beef Carcass Grading and Evaluation

Texas A&M Ranch to Rail - North/South Summary Report. Performance Information

EFFICIENCY OF THE COW HERD: BULL SELECTION AND GENETICS

The Use of Real-Time Ultrasound to Predict Live Feedlot Cattle Carcass Value

We are in the bull business

Backgrounding Calves Part 1: Assessing the Opportunity

Effect of Feed Delivery Management on Yearling Steer Performance

Red Angus Guide to EPDs

Predicting Profit. The Rancher s Guide to EPDs

E.A.R. Program (National Carcass Evaluation Program)

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2016 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Wagyu 101. Michael Scott Certified Executive Chef Academy of Chefs Corporate Chef for Rosewood Ranches Texas Raised Wagyu Beef

The Value of Preconditioning Programs in Beef Production Systems. D.L. Roeber and W.J. Umberger 1

Use of Linear and Non-linear Growth Curves to Describe Body Weight Changes of Young Angus Bulls and Heifers

Texas A&M Ranch to Rail - North/South Summary Report

July 21, 2014 COWCHIP

Animal response or performance is determined. Genetic-Environmental Interaction. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle II:

Value of Modified Wet Distillers Grains in Cattle Diets without Corn

Selecting the Right Genetics (Matching Cows to your Environment) David W. Schafer Arizona Beef Day July 29, 2009

Prediction of Carcass Traits Using Live Animal Ultrasound

Relationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues

Effect of Selected Characteristics on the Sale Price of Feeder Cattle in Eastern Oklahoma: 1997 & 1999 Summary

DAIRY HEIFER MANAGEMENT RECORD

Benchmark Angus. Engineering Superior Beef

Transcription:

Making Beef Out of Dairy Dairy beef cross cattle have become an increasingly popular option for dairy farmers looking to capture additional market value on calves that aren t needed for the dairy herd. Many dairy farms are selecting a percentage of their lower-potential or low-producing animals of the herd and breeding to beef sires. Breeding to beef sires with carcass trait merits has the potential to produce calves that will capture better prices in the sale barn or yield carcasses that can net more value compared to purebred dairy animals. Data was collected on 17 dairy beef cross steers (n=10) and heifers (n=7). All of the steers and heifers were out of the same sire, a Simmental-Angus cross with the genetic capacity to pass on desirable carcass traits. Cattle sex, birthweights (BW), weaning weights (WW), and average daily gains (ADG) from birth to weaning were recorded by the farm. One missing birthweight was recorded as an average birthweight of the group data was collected on. Calves were weaned at 60 days of age. Animals were grown out until approximately 1400 pounds. Cattle were slaughtered at a local processing plant and carcass data was collected by Extension agents. Hot carcass weight (HCW) was recorded by processing plant workers. Live weights (LW) were estimated based off of hot carcass weight, assuming a 60% dressed weight. Back fat (BF), loin muscle area (LMA), percent kidney, pelvic, & heart fat (%KPH), and quality grade (QG) were measured for each carcass. Yield grade (YG) was calculated from these measurements using the standard formula. Back fat and loin muscle area were measured at the 12th rib. Intramuscular marbling was visually appraised and quality grade assigned based on USDA standards. Yield grade=2.5 + (2.5 x FT) + (0.2 x %KPH) + (0.0038 x HCW) - (2 x LMA) Heifer 52377 had a hot carcass weight of 822 pounds, inches of back fat, a 15.6 square inch loin, a quality grade of prime, and a yield grade of 2.28.

Gross carcass value (CV) was calculated based on a market average on July 10. For choice or better steers and heifers, value was assigned at $110/hundredweight (cwt) and high yielding choice or better steers and heifers at $121/cwt based on calculated yield grade. Animals with yield grade of 1 or 2 were assigned the high yielding average value ($121/ cwt), while animals with yield grade 3 or below were assigned the average yielding value ($110/cwt) based on the assumption buyers were paying more for the higher yielding animals on a live weight basis. All animals graded choice or better. The average data were as follows: hot carcass weight was 866 pounds, back fat was 5 inches, loin muscle area was 13.4 square inches, and two percent kidney, pelvic, and heart fat. The average yield grade was 3.06. The average gross animal value was $1643.03. A Feed cost to gain for the ration these animals were on was $8/lb. Yardage cost to gain was $0.84/lb. B Other costs per head totaled $161. Breakeven price per sold cwt =$106.65 The Feedlot Enterprise Worksheet used to calculate breakeven prices and cost to gain prices is available on the Wisconsin Beef Information Center website at https://goo.gl/53rbeb or by scanning the QR code. A Steer 52307 had inches of back fat, 12.3 in 2 loin muscle area, and a yield grade of 3.60. B Steer 52399 had inches of back fat, 14.6 in 2 loin muscle area, and a yield grade of 2.42. We would like to thank Ebert Enterprises for their generosity in supplying animal information and allowing us to collect data on their dairy-beef cross animals. We also want to thank Marchant s Foods for recording hot carcass weights, ribbing the carcasses, and allowing access to their cooler so that we could collect carcass data on these animals. 2017 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, doing business as the Division of Cooperative Extension of the University of Wisconsin-Extension. University of Wisconsin, U. S. Department of Agriculture and Wisconsin counties cooperating. UW-Extension provides equal opportunities in employment and programming including Title IX and ADA requirements.

Making Beef Out of Dairy (A supplemental piece to the Making Beef Out of Dairy fact sheet) A group of dairy-beef steers and heifers born and raised on the same farm were evaluated for live and carcass performance. The animals were raised, housed, managed, and fed the same from birth to harvest. Approximately 650 head of dairy beef cattle are marketed per year from the farm. Photos of the animals were taken before and after harvest. Data was collected on 17 dairy-beef cross steers (n=10) and heifers (n=7). All of the steers and heifers were sired by the same Simmental-Angus cross bull with the genetic capacity to pass on desirable carcass traits. Cattle sex, birthweights (BW), weaning weights (WW), and average daily gains (ADG) from birth to weaning were recorded by the farm. One missing birthweight was recorded as an average birthweight of the group data was collected on. Calves were weaned at 60 days of age. Animals were grown out until approximately 1,400 pounds. 52306 Steer 52307 Steer 12.0 2.78 12.3 Low 3.2 52313 Heifer 52371 Heifer 14.3 2.67 0.6 11.9 High 3.43 Agriculture Agent, UW-Extension Marquette County. Carcass data collected and live photos taken by Aerica Bjurstrom

Making Beef Out of Dairy (A supplemental piece to the Making Beef Out of Dairy fact sheet) 52396 Steer 52399 Steer Carcass image not available 17.0 Low 1.5 14.6 2.02 52407 Heifer 52417 Steer 13.0 3.01 12.1 Low 2.36 53966 Heifer 52395 Steer 14.6 2.14 12.1 High 2.92 2017 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, doing business as the Division of Cooperative Extension of the University of Wisconsin-Extension. University of Wisconsin, U. S. Department of Agriculture and Wisconsin counties cooperating. UW-Extension provides equal opportunities in employment and programming including Title VI, Title IX, and ADA requirements. Agriculture Agent, UW-Extension Marquette County. Carcass data collected and live photos taken by Aerica Bjurstrom

Making Beef Out of Dairy (A supplemental piece to the Making Beef Out of Dairy fact sheet) 52372 Heifer 52377 Heifer 0.7 11.5 3.64 15.6 1.89 52383 Steer 52384 Heifer 12.5 2.64 13.3 2.63 52386 Steer 52365 Steer (live photo not available) Back Loin Muscle fat Area 0.7 14.2 3.11 12.6 Quality Yield High 3.0 52422 Steer (live photo not available) Back Loin Muscle fat Area 13.9 Quality Yield 2.04 2017 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, doing business as the Division of Cooperative Extension of the University of Wisconsin-Extension. University of Wisconsin, U. S. Department of Agriculture and Wisconsin counties cooperating. UW-Extension provides equal opportunities in employment and programming including Title VI, Title IX, and ADA requirements. Agriculture Agent, UW-Extension Marquette County. Carcass data collected and life photos taken by Aerica Bjurstrom