Evaluation of the Affordable Bus Pass Program

Similar documents
Lotteries Yukon s 2013 Household Survey and Web Survey Summary of Results

Citizens First 8 KEY INSIGHTS AND FINDINGS. Presented by: Dan Batista, Executive Director December 10, Citizens First 8

How to carry out market research

City of Kingston Information Report to Council Report Number

Using Administrative Advocacy to Improve Access to Public Benefits. by Suzanne Wikle

Evaluating the social impact of the Causeway Work Centre s social enterprises

CHAIR & MEMBERS VICTORIA REGIONAL TRANSIT COMMISSION December 8, 2015 SUBJECT: 2016/ /19 FARE STRUCTURE

Purpose of Fares FARES FED/STATE GRANTS ACCESS-A-RIDE SALES TAX FACILITIES RAIL SERVICE BUS SERVICE

Legal Aid Ontario Strategic Plan

Financial Services: Maximize Revenue with Better Marketing Data. Marketing Data Solutions for the Financial Services Industry

Implementing Queensland s One Social Housing System

The City of Edinburgh Council and the Leith Neighbourhood Partnership

have your say Review of local transport services in Tyne and Wear

Economic Impacts Memorandum. December 12, 2017 Revised: January 22, 2018

Marketing Data Solutions for the Financial Services Industry

DRAFT 2016 Budget and Financial Plan

Transit Fare Strategy Draft Recommendations

Dear Dial-a-Ride Customer:

Bus Rapid Transit Network Marketing Strategy

August 18, The tables on the following pages include results from two sources.

Business Assessment. Advisor Tool Galliard, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Apprenticeship Funding. Apprenticeship funding in England from May 2017

Open Public Services White Paper. Voice4Change England briefing paper, August 2011

QOL Pilot Study & MnDOT s Online Community

Public Input CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP (CAG)

POSITION DESCRIPTION

POSITION DESCRIPTION

Client Satisfaction and Trust & Confidence in Peel

Breaking Down the Barriers to Benefits

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

White Paper: Executive Search Firm How to Engage and Utilise Them Successfully. By Simon Fransca Khan of Leading Headhunters Hunter & Chase

HIGH EFFICIENT FURNACE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOWER INCOME MANITOBANS

2018 Fare Change Proposal

MBTA Fare Policy. Approved December 21, I. Purpose

Part One. What Is Economics?

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Mutual Fund Directors Forum

What we wanted to find out

Communicating with Customers in Context

Customer Experience & Satisfaction Lessons from the 2018 Rider Survey

Chapter 3 Stakeholder Interviews and Summary of Needs

The Hidden Cost of Ventra. The Impact of the Ventra Fare System on Chicago Social Service Providers

CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR LABOUR MARKET AGREEMENT Annual Plan

ASSIST Program. Regional Barrier Free Transportation Demonstration Project. Background. Summary Report Written By Deanne McNeil, 2013

MOBILE WALLET PILOT REPORT - JORDAN

SMART ADVERTISING, SMART BUSINESS Creating opportunities for Australian SMBs embracing digital marketing

Professional Excellence in Financial Services Bridging Program

So the reasons for pursuing consumer participation in service delivery are:

Tomorrow s passengers: understanding how to make rail travel more attractive to infrequent and non-users. April 2018

Reliability of supply and safety, however, remain important factors in our customer s value perceptions and must not be disregarded.

DHS STRATEGY MAP SFY

Legislative Review of the Income and Employment Support Act and Regulations SNL A TIME FOR REFLECTION CONSULTATION BOOKLET

Topic 2 - Market Research. N5 Business Management

Statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce

2015 Provincial Prebudget Submission

PUBLIC CHOICES, PUBLIC GOODS, AND HEALTHCARE

A process report. Piloting The Journey to Employment (JET) Framework in Northern Ireland

Emerging Leaders Vision of the Future Survey Overview, May 22, 2018

East End Transit Survey Results

Individual Case Management Approaches for Vulnerable Groups

6. Cross-Cutting Issues Indicators

The Myth of Paperless Payments

Moving Together with UN Fleet Sharing

Economic Opportunity Act (EOA) of 1964:

Resilience is our ability to respond and adapt to change in ways that are proactive, build local capacity, and ensure essential needs are met.

Public attitudes towards climate change and the impact of transport: 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (January 2010 report)

GEM Report A MOBILE STAFF. A Monscierge Guest Experience Management Report

NCFE Level 2 Certificate in Business and Enterprise (601/0048/5) Marketing for business and enterprise

W-2 Eligibility Review in CARES Worker Web (CWW) - Desk Aid

Transit System Survey

Business Studies BUSS1 (JUN09BUSS101) General Certificate of Education Advanced Subsidiary Examination June Planning and Financing a Business

Supported Employment Technical Questions and Answers For Service Provider

Employment Outcomes Model

Chapter 1 About Contact Channels

Pass Program Study. Modeling Results. December 19, 2017

SOUTH COUNTY TRANSIT STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN Approved April 25, 2018

The Indian Digital Traveler Research. November 2017

What We Heard MODERNIZING MANITOBA S CONSERVATION DISTRICTS PROGRAM

FORUM DISCUSSION NOTES

Office of the Auditor General: Follow-up to the 2012 Audit of Ontario Works Eligibility Assessment Process, Tabled at Audit Committee October 27,

CTECIntelligence. America s Biggest Employer. Voters believe that technology is the industry that will create the most jobs over the next 10 years

Michigan State University Contract and Grant Administration Post-Award Newsletter- Issue 6 December 2014 Table of Contents

SOCIAL SERVICE COLLABORATION: MOVING TOWARDS INTEGRATION OF FORMS AND SERVICES

Customer Service Strategy. Adelaide City Council. Contents

Type: Regular 1 Hanson & Caissie

ANNEX F BRESSAY LINK. STAG 1: APPRAISAL SUMMARY TABLES (ASTs)

Needs Assessment Report On Detroit Workforce Development Sector Prepared by the Michigan Nonprofit Association s AmeriCorps VISTA Team: Stephanie

Calgary Building Services ZBR Implementation

CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR LABOUR MARKET AGREEMENT Annual Plan

A Proposal to be the Service System Managers of the Employment Programs in Northern and Northwestern Ontario District Service Areas

OPINION POLLING ON ONTARIO S AGRI-FOOD SECTOR NOVEMBER 2017 RESULTS

Unlocking value in a reference library through the application of business process mapping and job analysis techniques

Skills Development Program Guidelines

Carer Leave Policy. NHS Ayrshire & Arran Organisation & Human Resource Development Policy

Real Good, Not Feel Good A Brief Guide to High-Impact Philanthropy

Destination Our story so far. The context we operate in. Our Vision remains the same. What we do and who we re here for

Nutrient Management Planning in Nova Scotia Past, Present and Future

An Investigation into Toronto Community Housing Corporation s Medical and Safety at Risk Priority Transfer Process for Tenants

Transcription:

Talor Newberry Consulting 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Evaluation of the Affordable Bus Pass Program October 10, 2013 This brief provides a summary of the findings from an evaluation of the Affordable Bus Pass Program (ABPP) managed by the Affordable Bus Pass Steering Committee at the City of Guelph. This report shows that the program has achieved all of its stated goals, and that it has made a real difference in the lives of more than 2,000 people living in poverty in Guelph. The program has been more popular than expected, and more complicated to manage. The evaluation report makes recommendations about investing in program management, streamlining the application process, and simplifying ongoing data collection and reporting. PREPAREDFOR

2 Evaluation of the Affordable Bus Pass Program The Afffordable Bus Pass Program is a bus subsidy program designed to increase the affordability and accessibility of public transit for people living with low income. It was initiated by the City of Guelph in 2012, in response to feedback from the community. The ABPP is expected to reduce barriers to accessing work, recreation and other amenities so all citizens can truly participate in the community. The target population of the program is individuals and families living with a low income in Guelph. For the purposes of determining eligibility, Statistics Canada s Low Income Cut-Off (LICO) is used to define low income, and only those who have incomes below this cut-off are eligible. Many of those who are eligible for the Affordable Bus Bass (ABP) are receiving income from Ontario Works (OW) and Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP). The pilot is managed by Community and Social Services. Guelph Transit is a key partner. Evaluation Questions To what extent was the program utilized by members of the target population? Were the program goals and objectives met? How did the program impact transit usage? What are the program strengths, challenges, and opportunities? What are the recommended areas for change and improvement? Were the budget and resources allocated to the program sufficient? Evaluation Methodology This evaluation study used qualitative data from focus groups and interviews. It was also informed by quantitative data from application forms submitted by citizens entering the ABPP. For more detailed information about the methodology please consult the full report. Who Uses the Affordable Bus Pass? As of July 2013, approximately 2,700 discrete individuals had applied for the affordable bus pass as primary applicants, and 2,178 had been approved. Because applicants can include other family members in their application, we estimate that the successful applications covered a total of 2,596 people. From these figures, we can estimate that about 27% of people living below the Low Income Cutoff in Guelph have become users of the Affordable Bus Pass. 1 1 In 2012, the low income cutoff for Guelph ranged from $16,573 per year for a single adult to $35,681 for a family of five. Simply stated, affordable transportation is absolutely necessary for families and individuals who already have to be extremely careful where their limited money is spent. Knowing that there is a reliable, accessible and affordable public transit system means there is more money to save or spend elsewhere, and also means that there are more opportunities for improving one s own and family s wellbeing. Guelph Wellington Poverty Taskforce

Talor Newberry Consulting 3 Use of the pass has exceeded initial projections, and is growing over time. The total number of applications has exceeded the original estimate (of 1,800 applications) by 50%. Almost all affordable bus pass users (96%) had used Guelph Transit before entering the program. Of the 910 re-applicants who stated that they were transit users prior to the ABPP, 47% were previous subsidized pass holders, 35% used cash and/or tickets, and 19% used a regular bus pass. Many different groups of people make use of the Affordable Bus Pass. Middle-aged people, older adults, and single adults seem to use the pass more consistently than younger people. Some people with disabilities or other kinds of mobility limitations appear to buy passes intermittently, depending on their health status, the weather, or changes in life circumstances. More than 80% of those living with low incomes in the City have not yet purchased passes. The comments of those who buy passes rarely suggest that the Affordable Bus Pass may be most useful to people who have a consistent, ongoing need for public transit on a daily basis, and less useful to people whose lives are in such transition or crisis that their transit needs are unpredictable. How Accessible is the Affordable Bus Pass? It frees up an extra $30 to do other things this can help pay for medical expenses. So not only can I get to swimming and physio, I can pay for it now, too. Bus Pass user Application process: All users who participated in focus groups believed the application form was straightforward, but several suggested that it would be helpful if more plain language information about the application process was made widely available. There was some suggestion that the form might be confusing for users who are less comfortable with written communication. Evaluation participants suggested the elimination of annual re-applications for at least some users. Ontario Disability Support Program clients often have unchanging situations from year to year. Ontario Works clients can be very transient which makes it difficult for caseworkers to get clients to renew their applications. Appeals process: The ABPP team has considered some appeals from people who were ruled ineligible. However, the challenge of maintaining consistency when a customer receives an exception to the rules has been felt by users and service staff alike. Among staff in the focus group and interviews, clear, black-and-white rules for appeals are wanted so that case-by-case decisions are not up to individual discretion. Pass Sales: Locations for sales of passes were deemed sufficient by users who participated in focus groups. However, there is currently no location in the South end of Guelph. Using the first three digits of postal codes provided on applications, it was determined that 16% of applicants to the ABPP are located South of Stone Rd.

4 Evaluation of the Affordable Bus Pass Program How is the Pass Helping the People Who Use it? People with low incomes who had not been eligible under the previous program (which only provided subsidized passes to people with disabilities) are purchasing passes and using transit more frequently. Public transportation is consuming less money from their monthly budgets, leaving more for food and shelter. Most importantly, increased access to public transit has improved overall wellbeing. In particular, the pass has enabled people with low incomes to use transit in a more frequent and flexible way. This has led to more of the kinds of non-essential trips that create a sense of connection to family, community, and services. In other words, the ABPP has helped to build the assets of people living in poverty in a few ways. It has built financial assets by reducing the cost of transit. It has built physical assets by enabling users to get to work, apply for jobs, and access the services they need more consistently. It has also built social assets, by enabling users to make more trips for a greater variety of reasons and in a more flexible way. Riders are able to bring family members along when they take transit, and they are able to go out to social events and community meetings as well as doctor s appointments and job interviews. It has allowed us to do more with less. If a client is going to an educational course, say at Conestoga College, we will pay for them to get there, no matter what the cost of transit is. Since the cost of the ABP is so reduced, now we are able to offer extra support, like a book-bag, or other educational materials Partner Organization Primary Program Goal Goal Met? Insights Enabling more residents living with a low income to purchase monthly transit passes Yes ABPP users who participated in the focus groups were in unanimous agreement that the pass was affordable. These opinions echo the overall averages in affordability ratings given on re-application forms. Almost all ABPP re-applicants indicated that they somewhat agree or strongly agree that, I could not afford to buy a bus pass without this program. Making a positive impact on the budget of low-income residents Yes The ABPP saves people money that is used to meet basic needs. In the application and re-application forms, almost all re-applicants indicated that, The price of the affordable pass means I have more money to spend on basic needs. The average rating was M=3.5, between somewhat agree and strongly agree. The pass program also enables Ontario Works and ODSP to direct discretionary funds to meeting other needs. Improving perceptions of overall wellbeing Improving sense of contribution to community Yes Program users shared many ways in which the ABPP improved their quality of life, such as enabling hobbies and connections to family and friends. The overall sentiment was that the ABPP provided a sense of freedom to move around, which in turn led to the ability to lead productive lives. A common statement was that they simply would not get out much without the ABPP.

Talor Newberry Consulting 5 How is Program Administration Working? The staff team that has run the program to date has been very effective. They have worked together closely and shown dedication to the success of the program. However, they have also identified some challenges. Workload The ABPP has no dedicated staff, and running the ABPP has required more staff time than was originally expected. Program uptake has exceeded forecasts, and the process for managing applications and handling appeals has been time consuming. Data Collection Currently, data used to manage the ABPP is collected by three very different means: application forms, sales data from all locations that sell affordable passes, and pass swipes on the busses used by transit to track ridership. Each of these databases is managed by a different team and organized in a somewhat different way. Amalgamating the data has created challenges. Conclusion The City of Guelph created an affordable bus pass program because access to transit is essential for anyone working to overcome poverty. This evaluation report makes it clear that the pilot phase of Guelph s Affordable Bus Pass Program has been very successful. It has attracted more users than expected, and it has made transit more accessible for a very diverse cross-section of the community. It has continued to meet the needs of people with disabilities (who had been the primary user of the previous pass program), while growing to serve a number of other groups of people who live with low incomes. This success is a direct result of the hard work of many people within City government and in the community. Managing the ABPP has taken a great deal of energy and dedication from staff in several different city departments, as well as a willingness to work together towards a common goal and a commitment to documenting the journey carefully. Consequently, much has been learned. Moving forward, this program requires more administrative support than it has received to date. It also needs dedicated management. There are a number of ways in which the administration of the program can be streamlined to reduce the administrative burdens, as identified in these recommendations.

6 Evaluation of the Affordable Bus Pass Program Summary of Recommendations Explore extending turn-around times for applications, while maintaining customer focus. Consolidate and rationalize the application and sales databases. Review and streamline the process for analyzing and reporting program data. Create a dedicated program manager position and simplify the program structure. Assign additional staff time to the Service Guelph desk on Bus Pass Days. Explore the possibility of having key partners play a larger role in selling passes. Consider an alternate approach to income verification for users who are on ODSP and OW or users whose income is in transition due to recent unemployment, immigration or transition from school to work. Provide a plan language summary of the eligibility criteria and the application process. Create a formalized, transparent appeals process. At Taylor Newberry Consulting, we believe in sharing responsibility with our clients to achieve positive social outcomes in our communities. We also believe that our best work sparks new connections in your community between the people and groups with which collaboration is key to achieving great results. Most importantly, we believe in taking on work that will produce truly useful results. www.taylornewberry.com