Section 11: Urban and Wildland Fires

Similar documents
HAZARD DESCRIPTION... 1 LOCATION AND HISTORICAL...

Section 14. Energy Pipeline Failures

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

Wildfire Case Studies Yarnell Hill Fire Arizona 2013 Black Forest Fire Colorado 2013 Rim Fire California

4.14 Wildland Fires Historical Occurrences

Fires Urban and Rural (Wildfires)

Appendix C Risk Assessment Methods

NDSU - North Dakota Forest Service North Dakota Cooperative Fire Protection Initiative Budget Request

Introduction to Wildland Fire Management. REM 244: Introduction to Wildland Fire Management. REM 244: The South Canyon Fire

Executive Summary. San Marcos Pass - Eastern Goleta Valley Mountainous Communities Community Wildfire Protection Plan

Managing Fire Risk in the Bowen Island Municipality. April By 2007 B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd.

Understanding the Role of Fire in Forest Management

Colorado Front Range Fire Study Questions Conventional Wisdom about Fire Regimes

HIGHLANDS Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Presentation to Council March 1 st 2010 Val Fletcher Emergency Coordinator

LECTURE #21: Wild Fires: The Science & History

OVERVIEW... 1 PUBLIC SURVEY RESULTS... 2

Chapter 7 Risk and Vulnerability Analysis

ANNEX M: HAMILTON CREEK METROPOLITAN DISTRICT

Statement of. Dale Bosworth, Chief U.S. Forest Service United States Department of Agriculture

Volume II: Hazard Annex Drought

The Great Valparaiso Fire and Fire Safety Management in Chile

THE SAN DIEGO DECLARATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND FIRE MANAGEMENT

Recent trends and strategies for adaptation to wildfire in the US

Wildland Fire Management Strategy

ESCONDIDO FIRE DEPT TRAINING MANUAL Section Engine Module Page 1 of 6 Wildland Hand Crews Revised

Wildfire. An outdoor fire burning of varying intensity that is determined by it s surrounding

The New Normal Sustainable and Firewise Landscaping. UC Master Gardener Program of Sonoma County Mimi Enright, Program Manager

Summary: Wildland Fire Research February 2013

Section 3: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment. Description - Wildfire

Wildland Fires: A Historical Perspective

Fire & Characteristics of Wildfire

Wildfire in South Carolina

Michael T. Rains 45 Lindbergh Avenue Broomall, PA August 18, 2018

Hyde Park Hyde Park Wildland Urban Interface Project. Scoping Information February 2017

Fire Adapted Communities on the Plains. Master Volunteer Forest Steward Course Lisa Mason, Colorado State Forest Service April 22, 2014

Land Use Planning to Reduce Wildfire Risk: Lessons from Five Western Cities

Part A: The Fire Behavior and the Wildland-Fire Environment. (Rev. 01/31/2006)

Land vested in Her Majesty in the right of Ontario.

Hurricane Ike Impacts On Southeast Texas Wildland Fuels October 16 th 2008

Preparing a Community Wildfire Protection Plan

WILLOW BASIN WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE FUELS TREATMENT PROJECT Manti-La Sal National Forest Moab Ranger District

Walton Lake Restoration Project

State of the Valley Report

Characterizing the Fire Threat to Wildland Urban Interface Areas in California

B. Wildfire Mitigation

Fire Danger Rating Areas

PRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO

FACT SHEET: FEMA GRANT FUNDING FOR OAKLAND HILLS CITY OF OAKLAND August 27, 2015

CRS Report for Congress

FACT SHEET: BLM, USFS Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation Effort

Vegetation and Fuels. Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy

Drought Hazard Annex. Causes and Characteristics of Drought

Hamlet of Tulita. Community Wildfire Protection Plan

Position Paper on the Nevada County Fire Plan

WILDLAND FIRE OVERVIEW

Climate Change Adaption Action Plan Wildfire Management

Improving Wildland Fire Safety: A Challenge for Forest Fire Researchers

Overview of the Local Planning Process and Future Enhancements Dave Coats, The Polis Center

Regulating the Wildland Urban Interface

RIM FIRE Preliminary Fuel Treatment Effectiveness Report

Anchor Point National Wildfire Hazard/Risk Rating Model March 1, 2010

The process for assessing your subdivision or neighborhood can be divided into five

Weather&Wildfire: Winter Fire Weather Webinar. What you should know. What your audience should know. Juan Acuna Tom Spencer Stuart Coombs

California forest fires

Wildlife Conservation Society Climate Adaptation Fund 2014 Restoring Oak Resilience at the Table Rocks, Rogue River Basin, Oregon FACT SHEET

Bastrop County, Texas Wildfire Mitigation Study

El Dorado County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Community Tab for ROYAL EQUESTRIAN ESTATES FIRE SAFE COUNCIL ACTIVITIES

Municipal Fire Ban on Open Air Burning. Factors for Consideration

APPENDIX D: WILDFIRE ASSESSMENT

Volume II: Hazard Annex Wildfire

MODULE 5: ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS

Mike Merz Pres., BHNA

Presented by: Captain Frank Bigelow, CAL FIRE January 09, 2016

WILDLAND FIRE TERMINOLOGY

Forest fires in Canada

Home to about 56 million people, the Southwest includes Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Colorado and most of California.

Introduction to wildfires. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Simon Schnabl Assist. Marko Radak

Firewise Communities:

CHAPTER THREE SECTION 3.11 HAZARD PROFILE-WILDFIRE

Fire & Fuels Management

Fire History and Management

October Effective Wildfire Mitigation in the Wildland-Urban Interface: A Research Summary

The following table provides examples of significant fires in Los Angeles County from 1993 to 2009.

Chapter One. Introduction 1.1 Overview

Florida Emergency Hurricane State and Private Forestry Programs

VEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES POLICIES

Dear Interested Party;

Florida Emergency Hurricane State and Private Forestry Programs

DOUGLAS COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION Section 17 Wildfire Hazard - Overlay District 3/10/99. -Section Contents-

Washington State Department of Natural Resources Northwest Region R.A.M.S. Assessment

DOWNLOAD OR READ : WILDFIRES AND WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

US Forest Service Open Space Conservation Strategy

Linn County Community Wildfire Protection Plan

Nebraska. State & Private Forestry Fact Sheet. Investment in State's Cooperative Programs: Key Issues:

Building a Resilient Community in the Shadow of a Catastrophic Fire

Integrating Wildfire Management with Conservation Objectives. Richard Harris, Ph.D., RPF #1961

-embracing uncertainty in decision making-

Community Wildfire Protection Plan Development Process for Santa Barbara County

WASA Quiz Review. Chapter 2

Community Wildfire Hazard Risk Assessment Sun Country Cle Elum, WA

Transcription:

Section 11: Urban and Wildland Fires Contents Why Urban and Wildland Fires Are a Threat...11-1 Hazard Profile...11-4 History of Major Urban Fires...11-5 Location of Hazardous Areas...11-6 People and Property at Risk... 11-10 Potential Damages and Losses... 11-11 Why Urban and Wildland Fires Are a Threat According to the U.S. Fire Administration, the fire problem in the United States on a per capita basis is one of the worst in the industrial world. Thousands of Americans die each year from fire, tens of thousands of people are injured, and property losses reach billions of dollars. To put these figures in context, the annual losses from floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, and other natural disasters combined in the United States average just a fraction of the losses from fire. According to the National Fire Data Center of the U.S. Fire Administration, recent trends show a decline in the numbers of fires, deaths, injuries, and dollar losses to property. Despite these encouraging trends, however, an average of more than 5,000 deaths and 28,000 injuries to civilians, and more than 100 firefighter deaths occurred annually over the 10-year period from 1987 to 1996. The fire death rate, by State, is shown in Figure 11-1. This Plan addresses both wildland fires and major urban fires. For purposes of this plan, major wildland fire events are those that were greater than, or equal to, two-alarm fires. Major urban fires are defined as structure fires that were greater than, or equal to, three-alarm fires. Hazard Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 11-1

Figure 11-1. Fire Death Rate by State 1 Major Urban Fires The leading causes of fires nationally are arson, open flames, and cooking. Urban fires cause most fire deaths and injuries. The leading causes of fire deaths are smoking, arson, and heating. Between 70 and 80 percent of deaths result from residential fires. People under age 5 and over age 55 have a much higher death rate than the average population. These two age groups account for more than one-third of all deaths nationally. 1 Fire in the United States 1989-1998, United States Fire Administration National Fire Data Center. Page 11-2 Hazard Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin --

Wildland Fires A wildland fire is any fire occurring on grassland, forest, or prairie, regardless of ignition source, damages, or benefits. According to the National Fire Plan, 2000, the wildland fire risk is now considered by authorities as the most significant fire service problem of the Century. The National Fire Plan was issued by the U.S. departments of Agriculture and Interior. It defines the urban/wildland interface as. the line, area, or zone where structures and other human development meet or intermingle with undeveloped wildland or vegetative fuels. The interface problem has grown dramatically over the last twenty years, spawned by increases in population, urban expansion, land-management decisions that place neighborhoods adjacent to wildland preserves, parks, and greenbelts, and the ever-present desire to intermingle with nature. The marriage between humans and their property and wildland areas has significantly increased human exposure to wildfires. More and more people are siting their homes in woodland settings in or near forests, rural areas, or remote mountain sites. Many of these homes are nestled along ridgelines, cliff-edges, and other classic fire-interface hazard zones. There, homeowners enjoy the beauty of the environment but they also face the very real danger of wildfire. Years of fire suppression have significantly disturbed natural fire occurrences nature s renewal process. The result has been the gradual accumulation of understory and canopy fuels to levels of density that can feed high-energy, intense wildfires and further increase the hazards from and exposure to interface problems. Multiple devastating interface-area fires over the past several years have demonstrated the disastrous potential inherent in the interface. This danger is perhaps best epitomized by the Cerro Grande fire of 2000 in New Mexico or the Oakland, California, fire of 1991 in which 25 lives were lost and more than 2,900 homes destroyed. In a letter to the President after the devastating 1999-2000 fire season, the secretaries of Agriculture and Interior wrote, explosive growth in the wildland urban interface now puts Hazard Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 11-3

entire communities and associated infrastructure, and the socioeconomic fabric that holds communities together, at risk from wildland fire. Wildland fires can occur at any time of the year. Climatic conditions such as severe freezes and drought can significantly increase the intensity of wildland fires since these conditions kill vegetation, creating a prime fuel source for these types of fires. The intensity of fires and the rate at which they spread are directly related to wind speed, temperature, and relative humidity. Three different classes of wildfires exist. A surface fire is the most common type and burns along the floor of a forest, moving slowly and killing or damaging trees. A ground fire is usually started by lightning and burns on or below the forest floor in the humus layer down to the mineral soil. Crown fires spread rapidly by wind and move quickly by jumping along the tops of trees. Humans start about 90 percent of wildfires (cigarettes thrown from cars, burning of refuse, etc.); lightning starts the other 10 percent. The Edwards Plateau, where the wildfire risk is highest, is also a major recharge zone for the Edwards Aquifer. Vegetation, which also acts as a fuel for wildland fires, prevents run-off. If a major wildland fire were to occur and destroy the vegetation, sediment could run off into the Aquifer and, thus, endanger water supplies throughout the region. Hazard Profile Both major urban and wildland fire events can completely shut down facilities for at least two weeks and cause more than 25 percent of affected properties to be destroyed or incur major damage. Major urban and wildland fire events are highly likely. An event is Figure 11-2. Urban and Wildland Fire hazard Profile Summary Page 11-4 Hazard Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin --

probable in the next year. Winter is the peak period for major urban fires and fire deaths. The wildland fire risk varies considerably by month. Warning time for urban and wildland fire events is minimal or none. History of Urban and Wildland Fires An average of 1,627 urban and wildland fires are reported annually to the National Fire Data Center of the U.S. Fire Administration by jurisdictions in the Guadalupe River Basin. A breakdown of these reported events is presented in Figure 11-1 below. Because reporting is voluntary, it should be noted that additional urban and wildland fires may have occurred but were not reported. Figure 11-1. Frequency of Urban and Wildland Fires in the Guadalupe River Basin Year County 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 Caldwell 139 126 120 119 171 130 139 167 86 74 Calhoun 114 125 123 129 123 73 112 144 98 110 Comal 10 3 7 28 105 82 99 222 123 82 DeWitt 62 68 55 81 81 54 53 56 50 21 Gonzales 2 1 1 3 1 64 104 139 80 90 Guadalupe 284 443 414 554 454 316 624 742 329 206 Hays 241 196 215 300 312 264 252 294 214 214 Kendall 1 1 2 64 106 93 95 108 94 73 Refugio 52 38 37 70 62 53 54 46 41 18 Victoria 426 410 386 179 473 411 437 480 400 439 Totals 1,331 1,411 1,360 1,527 1,888 1,540 1,969 2,398 1,515 1,327 Hazard Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 11-5

Location of Hazardous Areas Any structure is exposed to the urban fire risk. The wildland fire risk is a function of: the climate (patterns over time); fuel complexes (vegetation); topography (slope, aspect and elevation); human factors (structures and infrastructure). Figure 11-4 shows the fuel complexes of Texas, categorized into low-, moderate-, and high-hazard fuels. The ratings consider the potential for spread rates, heat output in terms of BTUs, duration of output, difficulty of control, and potential for fire movement in the canopy of the vegetation. Fires resulting from fuels that have the highest potential for crowning, which are difficult to control and produce high heat for extended periods, posed the highest hazard. Page 11-6 Hazard Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin --

Figure 11-3. Fuels Model Map for the State of Texas Source: Texas Forest Service, Wildland-Interface Group The legend for this map is on the following page. Hazard Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 11-7

Page 11-8 Hazard Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin --

Figure 11-4. Counties at Risk to Wildfire in Texas Figure 11-5 shows wildfire risk across Texas, as determined by the Texas Forest Service. The map represents the cumulative weights of the risks associated with fuel complexes and population, and the weighted factors of population growth. These combined variables are the bases for the following risk categories: Low risk: Low risk counties are primarily those that have little population or population densities that are not located near or in a hazardous fuel complex. Moderate risk: Counties that may have a high population but are located near or in a moderate- or low-hazard fuel complex. Also, counties that have a low population but have significant growth located near or in a high-hazard fuel complex are included in this category. Substantial risk: Counties that have a moderate population and a high growth rate and are located near or in a high- or moderate-hazard fuel complex. High risk: Counties that have high population numbers and moderate-to-high growth rates and are located near or in a high-hazard fuel complex area. This overall hazard rating by the Texas Forest Service is descriptive and not predictive, based on wide-ranging parameters. In most cases, the interface risk in a county will change based on the Hazard Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 11-9

distribution of hazardous wildland fuels and population and growth within the county. Keeping this in mind, counties that have an overall low-hazard rating may have isolated areas within the county that are at high risk, just as counties identified as high risk may have isolated areas within the county that are at low risk. Table 11-2 shows the Guadalupe River Basin counties designated by the Texas Forest Service as Texas Urban Interface Counties. Their level of risk is presented in Table11-3 Table 11-2. Urban Interface Counties in the Guadalupe River Basin County Hays Comal Guadalupe Caldwell Risk Ranking High risk High risk Substantial risk Moderate risk People and Property at Risk There is no defined geographic hazard boundary for urban and wildland fires. All people, buildings, critical facilities, infrastructure and lifelines, and hazardous materials facilities are considered exposed to the urban and wildland fire hazard and could potentially be affected. It is not expected, however, that a fire would affect a large area. Page 11-10 Hazard Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin --

Table 11-3. Exposure to Urban and Wildland Fires, by Occupancy Class and County Jurisdiction Exposed Population Residential Buildings Exposed Comme rcial Building Exposed Critical Facilities Exposed (2000) Number Value ($) Number Value ($) Number Caldwell 32,194 11,374 2,387,436,000 60 285,885,000 33 Calhoun 20,647 9,835 2,171,890,000 78 281,066,000 75 Comal 78,021 42,027 10,237,572,000 214 927,348,000 70 DeWitt 20,013 6,983 1,530,674,000 50 249,433,000 33 Gonzales 18,628 6,510 1,315,844,000 45 208,323,000 26 Guadalupe 89,023 39,668 8,760,265,000 232 950,030,000 77 Hays 97,589 45,837 12,655,070,000 333 1,433,860,000 64 Kendall 23,743 12,844 3,164,217,000 85 391,066,000 23 Refugio 7,828 2,953 640,396,000 11 54,484,000 22 Victoria 84,088 36,206 9,418,849,000 348 1,548,383,000 69 TOTAL 471,774 214,237 52,282,213,000 1,456 6,329,878,000 492 Potential Damages and Losses Approximately 1,626 incidents of urban and wildland fires, based on reporting of historical events, are expected annually in the Guadalupe River Basin. Because reporting is voluntary, however, all urban and wildland fires may not be reflected in these figures. Potential dollar loss estimates for urban and wildland fires are not available. The historic average occurrence of major urban and wildland fires in the Guadalupe River Basin, however, serves as the best predictor of future expected recurrence. GBRA facilities (described on pages 4-18 and 4-19) are also at risk from this hazard. However, no estimate is currently available of potential damages and losses to those facilities. Hazard Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 11-11