DU obligations under REACH the formulators challenges

Similar documents
Use mapping tables / libraries

Frequent challenges observed in SIEF

Duties with regard to exposure scenarios

Implementing REACH - Safer chemicals in Europe

on behalf of : Cefic, DUCC, ECHA

Processing safe use for Resin Mixtures under REACH

Communicating safe use information on mixtures

REACH & Supply Chain. Dr Chris Eacott Stewardship Solutions. June 14th Workshop Centro Reach

Information on the supply chain

Update from ECHA. REACH Information and Experience Exchange Forum (RIEF IV) CEFIC 19 June 2015 Sheraton Brussels Airport Hotel

REACH with Ecolab REACH CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE

New IT Tools ECHA s outlook

REACH special subject: communication between companies

SCEDs Specific Consumer Exposure Determinants

Archivio Europeo delle miscele pericolose: aggiornamenti ed operatività

Chemical Safety Report

Developing Mixture Exposure Scenarios a perspective from the Lubricants Sector

SVHC Authorisation and Restrictions

ENES implementation plan April 2018

REACH & CLP implementation EU chemical industry view

Scaling DUCC/CEFIC ES Workshop

Endocrine discuptors under REACH

October 2012 Revision: 2. Prepared by the Cefic SPERC Core Team

Development of Generic Exposure Scenarios (GES)

ECHA Stakeholders Day 2017

Extended safety data sheets, exposure scenarios, risk management measures and operational conditions

REACH: how to deal with 30,000 chemicals

How downstream users can handle exposure scenarios Practical Guide 13

US implication when purchasing ARTICLES from EU. Suppliers in the EU will provide this information to you.

Workshop Exposure Scenarios. Workshop Exposure Scenarios. 21 October 2011

Data quality in CSR. Use, exposure and risk information. Andreas Ahrens (Unit C3) Lead registrant workshop Helsinki

Use maps and their benefits

Extended safety data sheets under REACH and CLP regulations

REGULATORY ACTIONS UNDER REACH & CLP FEEDBACK FROM ECHA S RAC

Public Consultation in relation to the REACH REFIT evaluation

Impact of the REACH Regulation (EC) n 1907/2006

Interface between REACH and CAD:

REACH Compliance. (Registration, Evaluation, Restriction and Authorization of Chemicals) New EU Legislation

The European REACH Directive in a Nutshell

Intertek Regulatory Services

David Green SLIC WG CHEMEX

REACH REGULATION: the new management of chemicals in Europe and operational tools. R egistration. E valuation. A Ch. uthorisation.

Exposure Scenarios. (REACH opportunities for the. Dook Noij NVvA symposium, Zeist, 24 maart 2010

2nd & 3rd Quarter 2018 EuroCoat 2018 feedback

J Williams & Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) Regulations. White Paper. Complimentary Advice for Clients

An Industry message to Lead Registrants. Phil Humphries ASD REACH Implementation Working Group. 12th October Slide 1

Chemical safety assessment what, when and how?

Presentation of the case study

TEXTE 28/2014. Standardisation of release factors for the exposure assessment under REACH Developments since 2010

REACh : Device Maker Perspective

REPORT ENES5 break-out sessions

How can spercs be used for IED implementation?

REACH Review: Industry activities and views

Chemical safety report (CSR) and exposure scenarios

Exploring Communication in the Supply Chain under REACH Authorisation process

Exposure Scenario processing for mixtures. Critical Component Approach (CCA)

Authorisation applications : process, learning lessons and suggestions. Aggie Kötze (REACH Manager, ILA))

Format for CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT [LOW VOLUME] USE

FEASIBILITY OF A MATERIALS INFORMATION PLATFORM AND THE WAY FORWARD

3: REACH Case Story Summaries

3 rd revised version. March Replaces the October 2005 version

DU obligations according to REACH and CLP in relation to exposure scenarios

PLANNING FOR REACH 2018 AS A NON-EU COMPANY

REACH Practical Guide on Exposure Assessment and Communication in the Supply Chains Part 1 3

Risk management get ready

Concept for Scaling of Environmental ESs ENES 2 Workshop

Assess hazards and risks What does it mean?

REACH. Main concerns resulting from the implementation of REACH. Within the Aerospace Defence and Security business VERSION 1.5

Contents Page 1. Introduction Context of this Document How to use this Guidance Overview of REACH

1. INTRODUCTION TO HANDBOOK 5

FINAL DRAFT REACH: STATUS, CHALLENGES AND CURRENT WORK. ETRMA CRIA meeting Tyre Industry Regulatory Dialogue

REACHing the 2020 goals

REGISTRATION, EVALUATION, AUTHORISATION AND RESTRICTION OF CHEMICALS (REACH) AND EU WITHDRAWAL

Guidance for downstream users

June Copyright. Disclaimer

Update on the revision of the CSA related ECHA guidance

Workshop on the safe use of chemicals by SMEs SMEs: time to update your CLP labels! Bruxelles 16 September 2014 Ludovica Malaguti Aliberti

European Commission (EC) Consultation; REACH Authorisation for Low Volumes/ Legacy Spare Parts

Joint versus Individual applications and Downstrean User Considerations

IT tool for formulators. NVvA 24 maart 2010

REACH A Jotun Perspective

Impact of PACT. RIEF IV Brussels 19 June Jánosi Amaya REACH manager Product Stewardship

FECC : the European voice of the chemical distribution From Pre-SIEFs to SIEFs feedback from the Chemical Distributors/SMEs

Implementation of REACH and CLP: Overview, Status and post 2018 possible actions

Industrial use in formulation of solid cosmetic and home care products

A UTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY GUIDELINE ON

CLP Annex VIII. Preparation of notifications for poison centres according to Annex VIII CLP

Implementation of toxicological data from other legal provisions (e.g. REACH) An industry perspective

Second REACH review and next steps

REACH & CLP Consequences for Plastics Converters, Compounders & Masterbatchers and Recyclers

EC-Regulation No.1907/2006 (REACH)

1 / 10. Consultation on the regulatory fitness of chemicals legislation (excluding REACH) COMPLETE

The EU REACH Regulation

REACH restriction process. REACH Conference Bratislava September 3-4, 2018

Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment

Public Consultation in relation to the REACH REFIT evaluation

Principles of REACH. Andrew Fasey AIHce 2006 Chicago, USA 16 May 2006

Authorisation in REACH

A study to gather insights on the drivers, barriers, costs and benefits for updating REACH registration and CLP notification dossiers

REACH What it means for company practice

Transcription:

DU obligations under REACH the formulators challenges Sylvie Lemoine / Erwin Annys Forum Stakeholders Workshop 6 October 2011 1

Who does DUCC represent? DUCC = platform for associations whose member companies use chemicals to formulate mixtures as finished products for end users (consumers and professional users) A.I.S.E. (soaps, detergents and maintenance products) CEPE (paints, inks and artists colours) Colipa (cosmetic products) EFCC (construction chemicals) I&P (imaging and printing materials) FEA (aerosols) FECC (chemical distribution) FEICA (adhesives and sealants) IFRA (fragrances) > 3,500 companies across sectors in Europe DUCC focuses on DU needs, rights, duties and specifities under REACH and CLP Cefic (European Chemical Industry Council): all chemical manufacturers are also downstream users Cefic and DUCC work together on consistency of messages to different parts of the supply chain, for an efficient implementation of REACH

Main DU deadlines (uses, ES focus) Comply with conditions of use included in ES received via the extended SDS: 12 months Carry out own DU CSA: 12 months Notify ECHA of intent to prepare DU CSA and if use is not covered: 6 months Update of CSR by M/I in case DU asks a new use to be covered: 1 month (for M/I) + time for up and down supply chain communication Update SDS for own mixtures (as applicable):12 months? Ref: Articles 39 and 37

As early as possible 12 months Dialogue supplier-customer DU obligations (in relation to ES) Receipt extended-sds from supplier Check uses are covered (own and downstream uses) NO Implement conditions of safe use / ensure safe conditions of use / find way to cover missing uses Assess options carefully (not all equivalent) Checking on Level 1: (ES titles, use descriptors, main exposure determinants) Checking on Level 2: conditions of safe use (OC & RMM) YES Forward relevant information from ES downstream (via mixture SDS) Identification of lead substances (e.g. DPD+) Integrate relevant ES info into mixture SDS NOTE: Other DU obligations not covered here include e.g. reporting new hazard information to supplier or reporting if RMM is not appropriate + other communication requirements (e.g. SVHC, authorisations,restrictions, etc)

Are my uses covered?? Options for DU Caution: not all options are equivalent! time wise feasibility DU: important to understand how to read an ES NO DU associations may work with consortia on missing uses Y N Revisit Options left

In practice, a headache Substance A, supplier 1 (registrant) t=0 Use check DU CSA option (6 mths) Use covered + safe (12 mths) Dialogue customer - supplier FORMULATOR (DU) TIMELINE Substance A, supplier 2 (registrant) t=0 Use check DU CSA option (6 mths) Use covered + safe (12 mths) Substance B, supplier 3 (distributor who is a DU, supplying formulator) t=0 Use check DU CSA option (6 mths) Dialogue customer - supplier DISTRIBUTOR (DU) TIMELINE Dialogue customer - supplier FORMULATOR (DU) TIMELINE Use covered + safe (12 mths) Substance C, supplier 4 (registrant): no ext-sds received SDS not updated yet? Substance not registered? Substance not subject to CSR/ES? t=0 Use check DU CSA option (6 mths) Dialogue customer - supplier FORMULATOR (DU) TIMELINE?? Use covered + safe (12 mths) Mixture A + B + C Mixtures of mixtures???

Substance uses and ES Deadlines apply for each substance/supplier combination (once extended SDS and registration number are received) Exposure scenarios are difficult to understand (no standard text yet, not harmonised, a lot of information) and expertise is needed Some important DU duties are conditioned by proper understanding / handling of ES content Supply chain communication is complex (multi-level, multi-player) Notifying ECHA of missing uses (below 1 T/yr) within 6 months could have little value if issue is solved afterwards Early dialogue with suppliers is highly recommended in order to ensure a use is indeed not covered (allows sorting out options in case of use not covered) deadlines apply once use coverage has been clarified with supplier?

SDS for mixtures The DU does not and cannot know how long he should wait in order to have all extended SDS of substances The DU often markets many mixtures: some form of automation is needed, but it takes time to develop suitable IT systems There is no ideal method for extracting and aggregating ES of substances into mixture SDS; a mixture ES is not necessarily the best or easiest option Short-term fix: forward ES of lead substance (as appropriate) Industry proposal for updating SDS of mixtures: Prioritise SDS update in case of new information and major change on substances: C&L, RMM Update is less critical if changes are minor. Then, it may be possible to wait until a complete set of ES is available for incoming substances Priority should also be given to new information related to SVHC / authorisation / restrictions

Conclusions DUs have complex and novel tasks: build expertise (SMEs!) DU challenges are numerous: deadlines, options We are only at the beginning of a long process that is essential to deliver REACH safety objectives Comprehensive IT support will not be available before 3Q2012 (best case) interim solutions in the meantime, focusing on priorities dialogue with substance supplier can help smoothen the process pragmatic approach on SDS issues and deadlines management Industry is engaged in a number of initiatives related to Exposure Scenarios (practical guidance, IT tools, supply chain communication, etc) Continued support from ECHA and authorities is welcomed