Distance from inlet end (ft)

Similar documents
Basic Types of Irrigation Systems. Surface irrigation Subsurface irrigation Sprinkler irrigation Drip/trickle irrigation

INFLUENCE OF NOZZLE PLACEMENT ON CORN GRAIN YIELD, SOIL MOISTURE AND RUNOFF UNDER CENTER PIVOT IRRIGATION

2016 JOURNAL OF THE ASFMRA

Agricultural Irrigation Assessment Form

Considerations for Nozzle Package Selection for Center Pivots

SPRINKLER PACKAGE WATER LOSS COMPARISONS

Comparing systems for cotton irrigation

Improving Nutrient Management through Advanced Irrigation Management

Irrigation can increase the production of

IRRIGATION SYSTEM, MICROIRRIGATION

Use of Irrigation in East Texas - Pastures and Forages

Center Pivot Workbook

ERRATICITY OF SPRINKLER-IRRIGATED CORN UNDER DROUGHT

TITLE: Irrigation Management Strategies for Peanut Production in the Texas Southern High Plains

SOIL AND THE HYDROLOGIC CYCLE

Demonstrated Water Conservation Technologies

CENTRAL PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION TEST

CHAPTER (7) TRICKLE IRRIGATION

Efficient Irrigation Considerations for Crop Insurance

COMPARISON OF SDI AND SIMULATED LEPA SPRINKLER IRRIGATION FOR CORN

LAT IS ALL we sell in agriculture. Whether

Operating, Calibrating, and Maintaining Irrigation Systems

Valley. Water Application RELIABLE DURABLE PRECISE ADVANCED RESPONSIVE

Irrigation System. BWCDD Zanjero Training 2/13/2008

E-book. Six ways to conserve irrigation water & pumping costs

Managing furrow irrigation

Cost Water quantity Water Quality Field dimensions Soil type Tillage operations

IRRIGATION RESEARCH & EXTENSION UPDATES

HOW TO SELECT A SPRINKLER BASICS

Valley. Water Application RELIABLE DURABLE PRECISE ADVANCED RESPONSIVE

WHO WANTS TO BE AN IN-CANOPY IRRIGATOR? INTRODUCTION AND GUIDELINES

Irrigation water management for subsurface drip

Todd P. Trooien South Dakota State University Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Brookings, South Dakota

Long-Term Salinity Buildup on Drip/Micro Irrigated Trees in California

Lift irrigation Using man or Animal power Using Mechanical or Electrical Power Flow irrigation a)inundation Irrigation b) Perennial Irrigation Direct

Drip Irrigation. Seminar report SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

Contents: Purpose and objective Water and energy conservation 1 1

Evaluating Center Pivot Drag line Drip Irrigation Systems

Cost Analysis and Water Conservation Potential of Irrigation Technologies in the Texas Panhandle Water Planning Area

Valley. Water Application RELIABLE DURABLE PRECISE ADVANCED RESPONSIVE

The goal of the demonstration was to demonstrate the advantages of pivot conversion to LESA and document the improvement.

Overview. Regional District of Nanaimo Team WaterSmart Drip / Micro Workshop. Water Source WATER METER. Backflow Prevention Devices

Introduction to Surface Irrigation

IRRIGATION WATER MANAGEMENT IN POTATOES: DROUGHT CHALLENGES. Howard Neibling

Subsurface Drip Irrigation in the Southeast

Colorado High Plains Irrigation Practices Guide

sprinkler technology Water Application Solutions for Center Pivot Irrigation Save water, save energy and do a better job of irrigating.

Efficient Irrigation of Pistachio:

Identification and Quantification of Efficiency and Uniformity Components

A BRIEF RESEARCH UPDATE ON SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION

NITROGEN FERTILIZATION FOR CORN PRODUCTION WHEN USING LEPA CENTER PIVOT SPRINKLERS. F.R. Lamm and A. J. Schlegel 1

No-till Oklahoma. Soil Compaction. Jason Warren Oklahoma State University Dept. Plant and Soil Sciences

Evaluation of RDI TM Precision Irrigation Jacob LaRue Valmont Industries, Valley, Nebraska,

IUCN Pakistan. Efficient Irrigation Systems

Placement and Interpretation of Soil Moisture Sensors for Irrigated Cotton Production in Humid Regions SITE SELECTION IN A FIELD OBJECTIVE

EVALUATING CENTER PIVOT, NOZZLE-PACKAGE PERFORMANCE

Overhead irrigation in the Australian cotton industry

TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE...V CONTRIBUTORS... VI I. MICROIRRIGATION THEORY AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION...1

Unit 6 Calibration. Learning Objectives

Ag Water Energy Center at Fresno State

Sprinkler System Capacity. AE-91 (Revised), August 2005 Tom Scherer, Extension Agricultural Engineer

Using Evapotranspiration Reports for Furrow Irrigation Scheduling IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT S E R I E S

CENTER PIVOT IRRIGATION

Todd P. Trooien South Dakota State University Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Brookings, South Dakota

ENSURING EQUAL OPPORTUNITY SPRINKLER IRRIGATION

Run-off & Soil Sealing

Toro Micro-Irrigation Quick-Start Guide

Agronomy 375 Key - Exam I February 15, 2013

Unit F: Soil Fertility and Moisture Management. Lesson 3: Using Irrigation

IMPACTS OF FURROW FIRMING AND SOWING PATTERN OF SUGARBEET ON IMPROVING WATER PRODUCTIVITY

Drip Tape for Northwest Liners. The Time Has Come! Val J. Tancredi Stettler Supply Company

Irrigating Efficiently: tools, tips & techniques. Steve Castagnoli, OSU Extension Service

Irrigation and Nitrogen Management

Florida Irrigation Systems 1

APPLYING SWINE EFFLUENT WITH SDI AND LEPA SPRINKLER IRRIGATION

Northwest Regional Certified Crop Adviser

Irrigation Efficiency, Uniformity & Crop Response. System performance evaluation

Sensor Strategies in Cotton. Stacia L. Davis, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Irrigation Engineering LSU AgCenter

Effect of Fertigation Strategy on Nitrate Availability and Nitrate Leaching under Micro-Irrigation

Water Management in Pecan Orchards. Dr. Jim Walworth Dept. of Soil, Water & Environmental Sci. University of Arizona

DL2000. Dripline Dripline PC with Rootguard Protection. Subsurface Drip System for Residential, Commercial and Golf Course Applications

METHODS OF IRRIGATION BY NAVANITA CHOUDHURY ASSISTANT PROFESSOR RSET

33. Fate of pesticides in soil and plant.

EC Furrow Irrigation of Nebraska Soils

USING CPNOZZLE FOR SPRINKLER PACKAGE SELECTION

Irrigation Management in Yuma County. Paul Brown Charles Sanchez Kurt Nolte

Brookdale Fruit Farm Inc

Bioreactor Landfill Design

Irrigation Scheduling: Checkbook Method

FIGURE Towing the compact machine.

4.2 Field evaluation of solid set irrigation systems

Simplifying Micro-Irrigation System Design with AquaFlow 3.2 Design Assist Software

Irrigation Training Toolbox Water Management. Planning And Applying Conservation Practices

Introducing the new 3030 Series Sprinkler

Integrating Irrigation and Conservation Tillage Technology

Series 86X Mini Compact- No Bridge Mini Sprinklers

Efficiencies of Florida Agricultural Irrigation Systems 1

3.8 Effluent distribution and irrigation systems. Managing effluent for irrigation. Systems for land application. Recycling irrigation tailwater

Water Savings from Crop Residue in Irrigated Corn

Irrigation Basics & Considerations for Lavender. Presented by John Steuble CID, CLIA

Transcription:

Advance Movement of water from the inlet end to the downstream end Curve of Time vs. Distance is NOT linear Rule-of-Thumb: 1/3 of the total advance time is needed to reach midpoint of the furrow length

Recession Process of water leaving the surface (through infiltration and/or runoff) after the inflow has been cut off Usually begins to recede at the upstream end Can also be plotted as Time vs. Distance Flatter" curve than the Advance Curve

Infiltration Opportunity Time: difference between Recession and Advance curves Infiltration Depth: a function of the opportunity time and the infiltration class (rate) of the soil

Distance from inlet end (ft)

Inherent non-uniformity because recession and advance curves are not parallel Factors affecting Inflow rate Slope Soil infiltration Roughness Channel shape Inflow time Length of run Part of infiltration may go to deep percolation

Alternate furrow irrigation Increases advance time, but reduces average infiltration depth (twice the width) Cutback irrigation Use large inflow rate during advance, and then reduce the inflow to match the soil's steady-state infiltration rate Intensive management is required

Land smoothing and laser grading Helps to improve uniformity Surge irrigation Alternate on-off periods for applying water Achieve higher efficiencies and uniformities in some soils Lends itself to semi-automation

Impact Sprinklers High pressure system commonly used prior to current concerns about energy prices and water conservation. Application diameters range from 50 to more than 100 ft Water loss during application can range from 25-35% or more Picture from: http://www.irrigationmuseum.org/item1.aspx?id=125

Picture from: http://www.irrigationmuseum.org/item1.aspx?id=125 Reducing the upward angle can reduce water loss These systems are still used for waste disposal because large nozzles and high evaporation can be beneficial In humid environments excess soil moisture is primary limitation for waste disposal http://www.irrigationtutorials.com/advice/why-not-use-thosehuge-sprinklers/

Mid-elevation spray application (MESA) Low-elevation spray application (LESA) Low energy precision application (LEPA)

Water is applied above the crop canopy Can require 20 to 30 psi operating pressure Newer systems can operate on 6-10 psi depending on drop spacing Above canopy irrigation reduced efficiency: Interception and evaporation

In corn production 10 to 12 % of water applied above canopy can be lost by wetting foliage Above canopy irrigation will lose 20-25% more water than LESA and LEPA systems

Apply water at low pressures (as low as 6 pis) 12-18 inches above the ground Less crop foliage is wet Drops are spaced at 60 to 80 inches apart depending on crop row spacing Application efficiency is 85 to 90%

Proportion of water leaving the irrigation nozzle which hits the ground Influenced by: Nozzle height Upward angle Droplet size Wind speed Humidity Canopy interception

Can be a problem in narrow row crops when drops drag though canopy which causes uneven water distribution Just through the drops over the truss rods to raise it. LESA is currently the most common irrigation system in the Panhandle

Applicators are located 12-18 inches above the ground which apply water in a bubble pattern Or, drag socks or hoses that release water at the ground are use.

Drag socks or bubblers can be replaced with chemigation or spray plates Spray plates may be useful for crop emergence

Nozzles are place in every other row Dry rows improve rainfall storage LEPA systems can provide 95-98% application efficiency

Irrigation rate must match soil infiltration rate Infiltration can be increased with Furrow diking Deep tillage of compacted soil Maintaining residue

Provides 100% application efficiency High yield/quality Field operations can be done during irrigation Decreased energy requirements Reduced salinity hazard Adaptable for chemigation Reduced weed growth and disease problems Can be highly automated No dry corners.

Disadvantages: High initial cost Maintenance requirements (emitter clogging, etc.) Restricted plant root development Salt accumulation near plants (along the edges of the wetted zone) Crop establishment can be difficult during droughts

Salt Movement Under Irrigation with Saline Subsurface Drip Water Sprinkler/Flood Salt accumulation leached radially outward from drip tubing Salt accumulation leached downward by successive water applications

Typical Subsurface Drip Tubing Installation for Row Crops Non Wheel- Track Row 30 in 12 14 in Drip Tubing Wetting Pattern 60 in 60-inch dripline spacing is satisfactory on silt loam & clay loam soils