ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE NEW CENTURY PLAN. I. Introduction. II. CEQA Authority for Addendum

Similar documents
CEQA FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS BUILDING PROJECT, LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY

FIFTH ADDENDUM TO THE CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN EIR APRIL 2015

I. CONSIDERATION OF 2020 LRDP FEIR (1/05) AND ADDENDUM #8 1

65 East Project (P18-045) Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO REVELLE COLLEGE APARTMENTS AND COMMONS DINING RENOVATION PROJECT

ADDENDUM TO THE NEWARK GENERAL PLAN TUNE UP PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH ) FOR THE NEWPARK PLACE SPECIFIC PLAN.

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ENV EIR FOR 6901 SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN OF THE SEGUNDO INFILL HOUSING PROJECT, DAVIS CAMPUS

Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. May State Clearinghouse No Prepared for: Prepared by: Consulting Engineers and Scientists

Addendum to Diablo Grande Specific Plan EIR and Water Resources Plan Supplemental EIR Diablo Grande Specific Plan, Phase I Page i.

... Noes: Supervisors:-N_o_n&...

ADDENDUM TO THE EIR. Specifically, Section of the CEQA Guidelines states:

ADOPTION OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

The Village at Corte Madera Expansion Project

CEQA Addendum. The Caves at Soda Canyon P Planning Commission Hearing April 19, 2017

Scoping Meeting for Vista Del Agua Project Environmental Impact Report

The following findings are hereby adopted by The Regents in conjunction with the approval of the Project which is set forth in Section III, below.

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration

2 Executive Summary 2.1 Project Location

County of El Dorado Notice of Preparation Tilden Park Project

Purpose of the EIR. Chapter 1 Introduction

KINGS COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

1.0 INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE OF THE DRAFT EIR 1-1

Schwan Self-Storage. Addendum to Schwan Self-Storage Project Mitigated Negative Declaration Case No DP RV

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF LAKEPORT GENERAL PLAN EIR

Agenda (Items may be taken out of order)

All of the following must be submitted before the Planning Department can process the application:

RE-ISSUED NOTICE OF PREPARATION SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW

CHAPTER 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION

Chapter 1. Introduction

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Malfo Recorded Map Modification

5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 INTRODUCTION

Mandatory Recycling and Single Use Bag Reduction Ordinances

C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE

CPC DA-TDR-CUB-CU-CUW-ZV-SN-ZAD-SPR-GB CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL-- COMPREHENSIVE LIST

5.0 ALTERNATIVE VARIATIONS

These findings and the Mitigation Monitoring Program ( MMP, attached as Exhibit B) address only the impacts of the West Branch Library Project.

U S E P E R M I T. CITY OF BERKELEY ZONING ORDINANCE Berkeley Municipal Code Title 23 USE PERMIT #

Environmental and Development Services Department Planning Division San Pablo Avenue, El Cerrito, CA (510) FAX: (510)

SECTION 5: ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT

From: City of Santa Cruz, Planning Dept., 809 Center Street, Room 206, Santa Cruz, CA 95060

UC CEQA CHECKLIST TEMPLATE INSTRUCTIONS & GLOSSARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 CEQA REQUIREMENTS 1.2 PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS

Requests Conditional Use Permit (Craft Winery & Assembly Use) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

SUPPLEMENTAL CEQA ANALYSIS OF REDUCED DENSITY PROPOSAL

SECTION 5: ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT

Mitigation Monitoring Program

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN OF THE MUSIC BUILDING PROJECT

NEPA THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT CEQA THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

Incremental Recycled Water Program 2007 ADDENDUM TO PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

I. INTRODUCTION. Third Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Report for The Grand Avenue Project

ATTACHMENT C: CEQA EXEMPTION NOTICE OF EXEMPTION. Santa Barbara County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

Introduction CHAPTER Project Overview

ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PLAZA BANDERAS HOTEL FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT City of San Juan Capistrano, California

Regulatory Requirements for Identifying and Analyzing Project Alternatives

Boulder Ridge Fitness and Swim Center

ADDENDUM (No. 4) TO SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# )

A DJUSTMENTS. B. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section of the CEQA Guidelines ( Existing Facilities ).

RE: Planning Case No: ZA CUB-CUX-CUW ENV EAF Project Address: 414 Boyd Street #B, Los Angeles, CA 90013

PLANNING AND LAND USE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES

11 April 8, 2015 Public Hearing

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

2.1 Project Definition/Classification/Initial Study Project Definition

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT REQUIRING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1.2 PURPOSE AND INTENDED USES OF THIS DRAFT EIR

Subsequent or Supplemental Impact Report; Conditions.

STAFF REPORT. DATE: March 27, Bryan Montgomery, City Manager. Joshua McMurray, Planning Manager

U S E P E R M I T. CITY OF BERKELEY ZONING ORDINANCE Berkeley Municipal Code Title 23 USE PERMIT # MODUP c/o The Austin Group LLC

a. The following regulations shall apply to all guest ranches:

A. INTRODUCTION. NO ACTION Alternative 1: No Action (Future Without the Proposed Action)

FOR THE. State Clearinghouse Number: Prepared by:

ATTACHMENT B THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CA RESOLUTION NO._6022_

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 2

Facebook Campus Project. City Council Study Session January 31, 2012

Los Coyotes Country Club Development Plan

PLANNING COMMISSION El Granada Elementary ITEM #1

Commerce Park. Draft Environmental Impact Report. CITY OF FONTANA Citrus Commerce Park SCH SEPTEMBER 2014 VOLUME 1. Project Applicant:

101 B. COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS January 18, 2001

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, Chapter of the RCMC regulates General Commercial Zoning Districts; and

PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

CEQA Initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM. Potential Industries Solid Waste Facility Permit for a Recycling Transfer Station

Revitalization Plan and EIR Board of Supervisors Hearing January 31, 2006

LAX Terminals 2 and 3 Modernization Project DRAFT EIR PUBLIC MEETING. Tuesday, March 21, :00 pm to 8:00 pm

SECTION 833 "C-1" - NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

El Dorado Avenue

Section 2.0 Introduction and Purpose

RINCONADA WATER TREATMENT PLANT RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Second Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report

2. Introduction. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended (Public Resources Code Section et seq.)

Requests Conditional Use Permit (Craft Brewery & Open-Air Market) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

Environmental Setting, Impacts, Standard Conditions of Approval, and Mitigation Measures


City of Sebastopol Planning Department

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Case No. CPC DA F-1. As amended by PLUM on June 19, 2018 FINDINGS

CEQA BASICS. The California Environmental Quality Act. Prepared for: Orange County Department of Education. Prepared by:

Patrick Prescott, Community Development Director By: David L. Kriske, Assistant Community Development Director

RENAISSANCE EAST ADDENDUM TO THE RENAISSANCE SPECIFIC PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VOLUME 1 OF 2 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #

5 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT

Transcription:

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE NEW CENTURY PLAN I. Introduction This document is an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the New Century Plan Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2006061096), which was certified by the in June 2009 (Certified EIR). 1 In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this Addendum analyzes proposed modifications (the Modified Project) to the New Century Plan Project approved in 2009, updated in 2014 through a Project Permit Modification and updated in 2016 through a Plan Approval (the Approved Project) and demonstrates that all of the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed modifications would be within the envelope of impacts already evaluated in the Certified EIR. II. CEQA Authority for Addendum CEQA establishes the type of environmental documentation required when changes to a project occur after an EIR is certified. Specifically, Section 15164(a) of the CEQA Guidelines states that: The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. 1 This Addendum is the fourth Addendum to the Certified EIR. In 2012, the approved the First Addendum to the Certified EIR in connection with a Plan Approval modifying Condition No. 28 of Case No. CPC 2006-1913-SP-SPP-SPR-CUB-ZAD-DA related to parking rates charged at the Westfield Century City Shopping Center. In 2014, a Second Addendum was prepared in connection with a Project Permit Modification (CPC-2006-1913-SP-SPP-SPR-CUB-ZAD-DA-M1) that provided for the conversion of office uses to other commercial uses and a reduction in residential units and floor area. In 2016, a Third Addendum was prepared in connection with a Plan Approval (CPC-2006-1913-SP-SPP-SPR-CUB-ZAD- PA2) that permitted additional seating for the sale and service of alcohol at the Westfield Century City Shopping Center. All three Addenda concluded that no new or substantially greater significant impacts would result from the modification in approved uses at the Shopping Center. Page 1

Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines requires a Subsequent EIR when an MND has already been adopted or an EIR has been certified and one or more of the following circumstances exist: 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Likewise, California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21166 states that unless one or more of the following events occur, no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report shall be required by the lead agency or by any responsible agency: Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the environmental impact report; Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the environmental impact report; or Page 2

New information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the environmental impact report was certified as complete, becomes available. As demonstrated by the analysis herein, the Modified Project would not result in any new additional significant impacts, nor would it substantially increase the severity of previously anticipated significant impacts. Rather, all of the impacts associated with the Modified Project are within the envelope of impacts addressed in the Certified EIR and do not constitute a new or substantially increased significant impact. Based on this determination, the Modified Project does not meet the requirements for preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. A. Overview of Approved Project The Certified EIR evaluated the reconfiguration and renovation of the existing buildings and outdoor areas within the Westfield Century City Shopping Center to provide for new retail, restaurant, and office spaces, along with landscaping and open space amenities. As approved in 2009, the Project included 358,881 square feet of net new Shopping Center space and 106,523 square feet of new office uses. The Project also included replacement of the two existing office buildings at 1930 Century Park West and 1801 Avenue of the Stars with a parking structure at 1930 Century Park West and a 262- unit residential tower at 1801 Avenue of the Stars. When accounting for the existing commercial uses to be removed, the Project included a net increase of approximately 104,440 square feet of commercial uses and 770,000 square feet of residential uses. In 2014, modifications to the Project were approved that provided for the conversion of 106,523 square feet of approved office uses to a slightly different mix of shopping center and office, and potential health club uses through implementation of an equivalency program. Modifications also included a 242-unit reduction (700,000 square feet) of the residential component with an associated reduction in the height of the tower. The Conditional Use Permit approved in 2009 permitted an additional 8 restaurants and 1,400 seats for on-site sale and service of a full line of alcohol. A prior Conditional Use Permit approval granted in 1988 authorized 18 new establishments with 1,450 seats for the on-site sale and service of alcoholic beverages, pursuant to ZA-87-0535-CUB. In total, the two CUPs permit 26 establishments and 3,068 seats (an additional 218 seats were previously approved for the Rock Sugar restaurant) at Westfield Century City. A Plan Approval was approved in 2016 for Case Nos. ZA-87-0535-CUB-PA2 and CPC-2006-1913-SP-SPP-SPR-CUB-ZAD-DA to permit an additional 570 seats within the Shopping Center, for a total of 26 establishments and 3,638 seats for on-site alcohol sales Page 3

and service. Of these 3,638 seats, the Plan Approval approved a total of 725 seats for the sale and service of a full line of alcohol for on-site consumption at Eataly. B. Proposed Modifications to Project Previously approved with construction underway, Eataly is a new marketplace and dining concept that will provide an Italian dining experience comprised of a variety of restaurants, food and beverage counters, bakery, retail items, and a cooking school within the Shopping Center. Eataly includes an interactive setting where patrons can have a sitdown dining experience and walk around during the meal, visiting counters offering diverse food items to learn about the food prepared on the premises. Eataly will offer meal preparation instruction from world-class chefs, scheduled cooking classes, instructional wine tastings, and other events. The total square footage, building envelope, and seating permitted for alcohol sales related to the Eataly restaurant have been previously approved by the City pursuant to the cases described above. The Modified Project consists solely of the following two requests for the Eataly restaurant to permit: (1) tasting and sampling of alcoholic beverages on all levels of the Eataly restaurant; and (2) an approximately 1,500 square foot beer/wine off-site sales area on Level 3, and an approximately 156 square foot retail package store on Level 3 selling a variety of foods and other goods including the off-site sale of specialty alcoholic beverages. C. Analysis of Proposed Modifications The proposed modifications would occur within the Eataly restaurant space approved and underway within the Shopping Center. Eataly s restaurant use, square footage and seating have already been accounted for in the impact analyses included in Certified EIR and Addenda. Further, the proposed modifications to provide for tasting of alcoholic beverages, and off-site sales within a small portion of Eataly, would not change the height, footprint, massing, or total square footage of the building. In addition, permitting alcohol tastings would not change the restaurant use already approved, which would be located within an established Shopping Center in a designated Regional Commercial center. The small, approximately 156 square foot retail shop proposed within Eataly would primarily sell specialty foods made by Eataly chefs and other Italian goods, and also include the off-site sale of specialty alcohol. The 1,500 square foot retail area would be limited to the off-site sale of beer and wine. These retail areas would be located within a much larger restaurant space on the third floor, unlike the off-site alcohol sales associated with a street-facing, ground-level convenience store. Additionally, all conditions of approval related to security and alcohol consumption would remain in place. Thus, the proposed modifications would not change any of the impact conclusions related to air quality emissions, aesthetics, utilities, traffic, parking, agricultural resources, biological resources, Page 4

cultural resources, geology, hazards, hydrology, land use, noise, mineral resources, population/housing, or public services. Based on the above, the Modified Project, which includes on-premises alcohol tasting and off-site alcohol sales associated with two retail areas would not result in any new additional significant impacts, nor would it substantially increase the severity of previously anticipated significant impacts. Thus, a new or substantially greater significant impact would not result from the proposed modifications. In addition, all of the mitigation measures included as part of the EIR and Addenda would continue to be implemented. As all of the impacts would be within the envelope of impacts identified in the Certified EIR, no additional environmental analysis pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines is necessary. Page 5