Age-Season Standardization

Similar documents
Establishment of a Single National Selection Index for Canada

CDCB tools for the improvement of the Jersey breed

11/30/2018. Introduction to Genomic Selection OUTLINE. 1. What is different between pedigree based and genomic selection? 2.

Current Reality of the Ayrshire Breed and the Opportunity of Technology for Future Growth

Including feed intake data from U.S. Holsteins in genomic prediction

GENETIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR HEIFER FERTILITY DR. HEATHER J. HUSON ROBERT & ANNE EVERETT ENDOWED PROFESSORSHIP OF DAIRY CATTLE GENETICS

Farm Management Decisions in the Era of Genomics

COW PRODUCTION MONTHLY REPORT

DAIRY HEIFER MANAGEMENT RECORD

Simulation study on heterogeneous variance adjustment for observations with different measurement error variance

What s Driving Dairy Profitability. Greg Bethard, Ph.D. GPS Dairy Consulting, LLC Blacksburg, VA

Simulation study on heterogeneous variance adjustment for observations with different measurement error variance

Dairy Science. An Introduction

Genomic prediction. Kevin Byskov, Ulrik Sander Nielsen and Gert Pedersen Aamand. Nordisk Avlsværdi Vurdering. Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Dairy Cattle Backgrou d I for atio

Estimation of variance components for Nordic red cattle test-day model: Bayesian Gibbs sampler vs. Monte Carlo EM REML

DAIRY CATTLE EVALUATION CAREER DEVELOPMENT EVENT

Big Data, Science and Cow Improvement: The Power of Information!

Animal and Forage Interactions in Beef Systems

Where can the greatest economic value of genomic testing be found?

Walking the Cattle Continuum: Moving from the BovineSNP50 to Higher and Lower Density SNP Panels

Conformation Assessment

Use of the Transition Cow Index as a Monitor of Herd Health. Health Records would appear to be obvious monitor, but.

Investigation on Genotype by Environment Interaction for Milk Yield of Holstein Cows in Luxembourg and Tunisia

Benefits of Raising Heifers on Pasture

2/22/2012. Impact of Genomics on Dairy Cattle Breeding. Basics of the DNA molecule. Genomic data revolutionize dairy cattle breeding

Emma Carlén, Jørn Pedersen, Jukka Pösö, Jan-Åke Eriksson, Ulrik Sander Nielsen, Gert Pedersen Aamand

Heifer Economics. Geoff Benson, PhD Extension Economist NCSU

MANAGING THE REPLACEMENT HERD

1 Improving through breeding

Improving fertility through management and genetics.

DAIRY HEIFER MANAGEMENT RECORD

Genomic selection applies to synthetic breeds

Genetic Parameters and Evaluation of Rear Legs (Rear View) for Brown Swiss and Guernseys

Introduction. Development of national and international evaluations. Considerable genetic variation in health and fertility traits!

Canada s Dairy Industry at a Glance

Using Genomics to Improve the Genetic Potential and Management of Your Herd

Genetic effects of heat stress on milk yield and MIR predicted methane emissions of Holstein cows

Decoding genomic selection and the benefit for unconventional traits

MILK. U.S. daily milk production is million gallons. Youth across the nation drink % of all milk consumed. oldest

Calving Pattern- The Most Important Decision on Your Farm?

Cattle Outlook. January, 2018

The breeding association role in the development of the Bulgarian Rhodope Cattle

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

Raising Dairy Replacement Heifers on Pasture and Soil Health

Genomic selection in cattle industry: achievements and impact

Why Crossbreed?? Dr. Tom Lawlor, Holstein USA

Breeding your cows for genetic gain. Max Tweedie, B+LNZ Genetics

Genetics Effective Use of New and Existing Methods

Mike Davis, The Ohio State University 6/19/14

THE EFFECTS OF CONDITION SCORE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF EARLY LACTATION HOLSTEIN COWS

Economic Impact of Bull Choices... A.I. Or Otherwise

Measuring Cow Efficiency in the Herd. Ryon S. Walker Livestock Consultant Noble Research Institute

EBI Base Change & Impact on Bull Selection. Kevin Downing

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

S. Aaron Smith, Michael P. Popp and Nathan Kemper. Executive Summary

CULLING: REPLACEMENT HEIFER STRATEGIES

Raising the Bar on Calf & Heifer Feeding & Management. Jim Barmore, M.Sc., PAS Nutrition & Management Consulting Verona, WI

Growth. Monitoring Dairy Heifer COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

Marketing Options to Improve Income. Ken Kelley Auburn University

Herd Summary Definitions

Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D.

Growth. Monitoring Dairy Heifer

Effects of heat stress on reproduction in cattle

Profitable Dairy Cow Traits for Future Production Circumstances

Creating Premium Beef Maximizing Dairy Profit

Genomic Management: Impact on Sustainability

Characteristics of organic dairy farm types in Europe

Dairy Outlook Midwest & Great Plains Outlook Conference. Katelyn McCullock Dairy & Forage Economist Livestock Marketing Information Center

Doubling Turkey's Dairy and Beef Production by 2023: Potential for U.S.-Turkey Partnerships

A SELECTION INDEX FOR ONTARIO DAIRY ORGANIC FARMS

Scandinavian co-operation

Longhorn Cattle Performance Recording

, 2018 (1) AGIL

Association of Cow and Quarter Level Factors at Dry Off and New Intramammary Infections in the Dry Period

Genetic Analysis of Cow Survival in the Israeli Dairy Cattle Population

Economic Analysis of Dairy Breeds

Calving Month Feed Budget Relative Cost

Breeding for milkability How to use the new possibilities

MARKETING ASPECTS OF GOAT PRODUCTION. Outline. Know your costs Know your consumer Know the prices. Marketing Aspects of Goat Production 09/12/2011

Ukraine. Vladimir Shablia, PhD. Institute of Animal Science of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine ( Kharkov )

Scope for a Subjective Assessment of Milking Speed

Factors Affecting Holstein Cattle Fertility Traits in the Slovak Republic

Milk Production. January Milk Production up 2.7 Percent

Breeding for Tuberculosis and Liver Fluke Resistance. Siobhán Ring Irish Angus Meeting, 7 th February 2019

2019 IBA ANNUAL AGRICULTURAL CONFERENCE

DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARD METHODS TO ESTIMATE MANURE PRODUCTION AND NUTRIENT CHARACTERISTICS FROM DAIRY CATTLE

Cattle Situation and Outlook

Single step genomic evaluations for the Nordic Red Dairy cattle test day data

Helping dairy farmers to improve economic performance utilizing data-driven DSS tools

Use of data from electronic milking meters and perspective in use of other objective measures

Youngstock Survival in Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design

Management MUN Frequently Asked Questions

Section 5: Production Management

Section 9- Guidelines for Dairy Cattle Genetic Evaluation

MONITORING HEIFER PROGRAMS

DHI-202 Herd Summary

An Economic Comparison of AI and Bull Breeding

Transcription:

Age-Season Standardization Dr. Michael M. Schutz Canadian Beef Improvement, Inc. A report on research conducted at AIPL, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD (financial support from the National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia, MO).

Background Former adjustment factors for calving age and season and their interaction were almost 20 years old: - 1974 for milk and fat - 1979 for protein for Holsteins (fat factors used for other breeds)

Background Management changes may have resulted in: - Earlier maturity of cows - Less effect by summer heat and humidity Present factors developed from models that didn t t consider relationships or differences arising from genetic trend

Research Objectives Estimate adjustment factors for milk, fat, and protein with animal models and relationships Account for changes over time Determine the effect of parity on adjustment factors (age within parity) Examine the impact of adjusting for previous and present days open

Data Calvings from 1964 to 1992 (1980 to 1992 for protein) Calving ages of 18 to 200 months Cows milked 2x Records Cows Breed Milk, Fat Protein Milk, Fat Protein Ayrshire Brown Swiss Guernsey Holstein Jersey Milk. Shorthorn 554,498 689,340 1,721,872 36,669,120 2,674,867 86,174 175,143 260,309 370,065 16,762,036 1,198,587 30,575 200,752 240,706 654,876 13,647,452 934,790 34,132 73,966 104,622 166,261 7,314,878 472,948 13,692

Time Periods 1964-1969- 1975-1981- 1987-1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 1960 1970 1980 1990 Protein Puerto Rico

Percentages of Holstein calvings by month and over time periods for regions 3 & 6. Month 1964-68 1969-74 1975-80 1981-86 1987-92 JAN 8.5 8.5 8.4 8.1 8.4 MAR 7.1 7.2 7.7 8.1 8.0 MAY 5.0 5.5 6.3 6.8 6.7 JUL 8.5 9.1 9.2 9.0 8.9 SEP 11.9 10.4 9.5 9.4 9.2 NOV 10.2 9.9 9.3 9.2 9.1

Average ages at calving for Holsteins by month and over time periods for regions 3 & 6. Month 1964-68 1969-74 1975-80 1981-86 1987-92 JAN 55.4 54.8 53.9 51.5 49.4 MAR 59.6 56.9 54.8 51.0 49.1 MAY 59.0 57.0 55.1 51.2 49.0 JUL 54.0 52.9 53.2 51.7 50.7 SEP 50.8 50.9 50.4 49.1 48.3 NOV 53.8 53.6 53.2 50.5 49.2

Regions 10 Holstein 11 9 7 8 6 5 4 3 2 1 1&2 3&6 4&5 7&9 8 10&11 12 12

6 Regions 4 1 3 5 2 Jersey

Regions 4 1 3 Ayrshire Brown Swiss Guernsey 2

Animal Model Y = TRML + TRA + TD C + TD P + H + P + G + E Y = Yield (milk, fat, protein) T = Time R = Region M = Month of Calving L = Parity group A = Age Class D C = Current days open D = P Previous days open H = Herd-year P = Permanent environment G = Animal E = Residual error

Mixed Model Equations Y = TRML + TRA + TD C + TD P + H + P + G + E X Z P Z A X X X Z P X Z A ZP X Z P Z P + I k 1 Z P Z A Z A X Z P Z A Z P Z P + A -1 k 2 B u P u A = X Y Z P Y Z A Y 2 2 e P k 1 = k 2 = 2 2 e A

Solving Equations Westell parent grouping Iteration on data Gauss-Seidel and Jacobi Iteration Iteration until average change in solutions was < 1 x 10-9 (about 400-500 rounds) Number of records and effects for regions 3 & 6 TRML TRA TD C TD P 720 400 450 305 HERDS COWS ANIMALS RECORDS 218,907 2,899,969 4,020,434 7,883,665

Age-Parity Classes Parity 1 Parity 2 Parity 3 Parity 4 Parity 5 Parity 6+ 18-21 28-33 40-46 52-60 64-73 76-86 22-23 34-35 47-48 61-63 74-77 87-96 24 36 49-50 64-65 78-80 97-120 25 37 51-52 66-68 81-84 121-144 26 38 53-54 69-71 85-91 145-200 27-28 39-40 55-56 72-77 29-31 41-43 57-58 32-35 44-49 59-63

Days Open Effects Effects of calving age are influenced largely by calving interval Previous Previous days open - Cows calving at early ages within parity are often disadvantaged by short days open in previous parities - Verified by subsequent calving date Current Current days open - May be correlated to previous days open - Cows calving late more likely to remain open

Average Days Open Parity 1964-68 1969-74 975-80 1981-86 1987-92 1 123 131 131 129 131 Holstein MI, OH, IN 2 3+ 120 124 127 133 130 138 130 138 132 139 Jersey National 1 2 128 123 131 126 127 124 125 120 120 117 3+ 124 128 128 125 122

Calculation of Adjustment Factors Age solutions within parity (for each breed, time, region, and trait) must be smoothed by linear and quadratic regression of age class solutions on average ages of the classes. Intercepts from the regression are added to the month by parity solutions (for each breed, time, region, and trait) for computing ease.

Calculation of Adjustment Factors Solutions for previous days open (by breed, time, region, and trait) were smoothed by linear and quadratic regression of days open solutions on average days open per class. - joint point at 150 days open - (days open - 150) 2

Calculation of Adjustment Factors Multiplicative adjustment factors are calculated on the fly for each 305 day 2X record as: yield base yield base + month + age + previous days open yield base = avg. yield of mature cows for a breed, region, and time period.

Calculations Holstein cow calving at 36 months in Parity 2 in JAN, 1992 in Indiana after being open 60 days in Parity 1. yield base = 19550.9 month = -7399.24 age = 268.366 x (36) + -2.5745 x (36 2 ) = 6324.624 DOP = -2502.06 + 32.1617 x (60) + -0.09426 x (60 2 ) +.11338 x (0 2 ) = - 911.694 Factor = 19550.9 19550.9-7399.24 + 6324.624-911.694 = 1.113

Base Age Mature yield appears to be reached earlier Ayrshires, Brown Swiss, Guernseys, and Holsteins had maximum yield at 72-77 77 months in 4th parity Jerseys had maximum yield at 61-63 63 months in 4th parity Milking Shorthorns had maximum yield at 76-86 months in 6th parity

Definition of Base Age Updating of age-season adjustments provided an opportunity to reconsider base age INTERBULL recommended adjustment to age of average production - Only USA, CAN, AUS, and ITA use mature age - ISR uses 36 months - Others use 24-30 months of age 37 months for Gue., Jer., and Hol. 42 months for Ayr., Br.Sw., and M.Sh.

Mature vs. Average Age Adjustment Mature Mature age - traditional Average Average age - More realistic: puts record on scale of average cow in herd - Adjusted and average yields similar for herds - PTA closer to actual superiority (inferiority) - Less bias when factors are not exact

Example 1 Holstein heifer: 20,000 lb. (305-2X) after calving at 20 months in August 1992 in Florida (region 5). Old New Factor for region 5, 20 mo., Aug. = 1.44 Adjusted yield = 20,000 x 1.44 = 28,800 Factor for time 5, region 5, parity 1-Aug., 1 20 mo. = 1.389 Adjusted yield = 20,000 x 1.389 = 27,780 Decrease = 1,020 lb.

Example 2 Holstein heifer: 20,000 lb. (305-2X) after calving at 20 months in January 1992 in Florida (region 5). Old New Factor for region 5, 20 mo., Jan. = 1.33 Adjusted yield = 20,000 x 1.33 = 26,600 Factor for time 5, region 5, parity 1-Jan., 1 20 mo. = 1.350 Adjusted yield = 20,000 x 1.350 = 27,000 Increase = 400 lb.

Example 3 2 Holstein cows: 20,000 lb. (305-2X) after calving at 45 months in January 1992 in Florida (region 5). - Cow A: 2nd calving, 120 days open parity 1 - Cow B: 3rd calving, 120 days open parity 2 -Old adjustment: Factor for region 5, 45 mo., Jan. = 1.05 Adjusted yield = 20,000 x 1.05 = 21,000

Example 3 (cont.) Cow A - New adjustment: Factor for time 5, region 5, parity 2-Jan., 2 45 mo. = 1.038 Adjusted yield = 20,000 x 1.038 = 20,760 Cow B Factor for time 5, region 5, parity 3-Jan., 3 45 mo. = 1.015 Adjusted yield = 20,000 x 1.015 = 20,300 Difference of 460 lb. between cows A and B

Observations Former Former factors over-adjusted young cows, but the over-adjustment was less than had been anticipated when genetic trends were ignored A A combination of multiplicative and additive adjustment appears optimal. Effects of season have diminished. Adjustment for age within parity, not age alone, is necessary.

Where Do We Go from Here? Additive versus multiplicative adjustment Adjustment for current days open Impact of 3x milking Revisit the issue of base age Test day models for genetic evaluation - No longer need age adjustment for G. E. - Still needed for management and interpretation

Effects of Previous Days Open on Holsteins in MI, OH, and IN from 1987 to 1992 Days open Milk (lb.) Fat (lb.) Protein (lb.) Prev. Parity Parity 2 Parity 3+ Parity 2 Parity 3+ Parity 2 Parity 3+ 20 60 100 140 180 220 260 300-1786 -863-218 149 330 549 817 1134-1719 -792-184 104 177 290 456 673-55 -28-7 6 13 23 33 44-58 -28-7 5 11 18 26 36-43 -21-5 4 8 13 20 27-42 -19-4 2 3 5 9 15

1.5 Holstein Smoothed Parity-Age Factors August Calving, Southeastern USA (Region 5) Factor 1.4 1.3 1.2 P1 Former milk factors 1964-68 milk factors 1987-92 milk factors 1.1 1.0 20 P2 P3 P4 P5 40 60 80 Calving age (months)

1.5 Holstein Smoothed Parity-Age Factors January Calving, Wisconsin (Region 8) 1.4 Former milk factors Factor 1.3 1.2 P1 1987-92 milk factors 1.1 1.0.9 20 P2 P3 P4 P5 40 60 80 100 Calving age (months)

1.5 Holstein Smoothed Parity-Age Factors August Calving, Wisconsin (Region 8) Factor 1.4 Former milk factors 1.3 P1 1987-92 milk factors 1.2 1.1 P2 1.0 P3 P4 P5.9 20 40 60 80 100 Calving age (months)

1.5 Jersey Parity-Age Factors August Calving, Southeastern USA (Region 2) Factor 1.4 Former milk factors 1.3 1.2 P1 1987-92 milk factors 1987-92 milk factors adjusted for previous and current days open 1.1 1.0 20 P2 P4 P5 P3 40 60 80 Calving age (months)

1.5 Jersey Parity-Age Factors August Calving, Southeastern USA (Region 2) Factor 1.4 1.3 1.2 P1 Former milk factors 1987-92 milk factors 1987-92 milk factors adjusted for current days open only 1.1 1.0 20 P2 P3 P4 40 60 80 Calving age (months) P5

1.5 Jersey Parity-Age Factors August Calving, Southeastern USA (Region 2) Factor 1.4 Former fat-protein factors 1.3 1.2 P1 1987-92 fat factors 1987-92 protein factors 1.1 P2 1.0 20 P3 P4 40 60 80 Calving age (months) P5