Tools and Methods to Reduce Uncertainties Associated with the Use of In Situ Remediation Techniques for Organic Contaminants in Soil and Groundwater

Similar documents
Prepared by Jean Paré, P. Eng. Chemco Inc.

Prepared by Ken Summerour, P.G.

Mixed Plume Remediation using EHC In-Situ Chemical Reduction and Oxidation Technologies

Field-proven remediation technologies for the most challenging sites.

ORIN. Remediation Technologies. ORIN Remediation Technologies. Chemical Treatments. By: Larry Kinsman

Common Causes of Remediation Failure and Solution Practices

Technology Overview KLOZUR PERSULFATE

Eden Remediation Services Kenneth Summerour, P.G.

NanoFe. Supported Zero-Valent Nanoiron. An Innovative Remediation Technology for Soils and Groundwater. PARS Environmental Inc.

In Situ Treatment of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater: Lessons Learned from the Field

Ex-Situ Soil Washing Achieving Effective Mass Reduction for Organic Contaminant in Soil via the use of a Co solvent/surfactant Process

Extended Release Potassium Persulfate: Laboratory and Field Results

Permeable Reactive Barriers for Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Technologies. Sciences. Clichés 11/21/2017

What is the CAPISCO process. Technologies used

Chemical Reduction processes for In Situ Soluble Metals Remediation and Immobilization in Groundwater

CRT CRT. Carus Remediation Technologies. Simplified Science. Carus Remediation Technologies. Carus Remediation Technologies

AIPG 4 th Conference: Innovative Environmental Assessment and Remediation Technology

Subsurface Distribution of ZVI/EHC Slurry Validating Radius of Influence. Josephine Molin, PeroxyChem October

CAP 18 Anaerobic Bioremediation Product CASE STUDY

Comparison of EHC, EOS, and Solid Potassium Permanganate Pilot Studies for Reducing Residual TCE Contaminant Mass

Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment

Optimization of ZVI Technology for In-Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Contaminants. Dr. John Freim OnMaterials, LLC Escondido, CA

Groundwater remediation with the use of PRB Technology. PRB TECHNOLOGY haw does it work and when to use it

NAVFAC RPM Tech Update: Design Considerations for Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination (ERD)

Combining Persulfate, In Situ Ferrate Generation and Enhanced Bioremediation for Safer, More Effective Remedial Actions

Bioremediation Product Series

Establishing Contact

Permeable Reactive Barriers for Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Bruce Tunnicliffe Vertex Environmental Inc.

In-Situ Chemical Oxidation DOUG HAMILTON, PRINCIPAL HYDROGEOLOGIST ACV ENVIRO

Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination to Treat PCE and TCE in a Deep Gravel Aquifer

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

TREATMENT OF PERCHLORATE AND 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE IN GROUNDWATER USING EDIBLE OIL SUBSTRATE (EOS )

Chemical Oxidation: Lessons Learned from the Remediation of Leaking UST Sites

OPTIMIZATION OF A CHEMICAL OXIDATION TREATMENT TRAIN PROCESS FOR GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION. Gary Cronk, P.E., CHMM

Conceptual System Design

Impacts of a Zero Valent Iron PRB on Downgradient Biodegradation Processes. John E. Vidumsky DuPont Corporate Remediation Group

Synergistic Treatment of Chlorinated VOCs Using Reductive Dechlorination and Zero Valent Iron

Bench- and Pilot-Scale Treatability Testing of ISCO and Surfactant Enhanced Biodegradation of Long Chain Petroleum Hydrocarbons

A TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM TO HARNESS SPEED AND CERTAINTY IN GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION

New England Storage Tank Conference

In Situ Chemical Oxidation of VOCs and BTEX Plume in Low-Permeability Soils. Amit Haryani, PE, LSRP

Chlorinated Solvent Remediation Technologies

Lecture 6: In Situ Bioremediation and Natural Attenuation

I. Van Keer, J. Gemoets, K. Touchant, J. Vos & J. Bronders

In Situ Activated Carbon-Based Technology for Groundwater Remediation: Overview, Best Practice and Case Studies

Chlorinated Solvent Remediation Technologies

Ashley Cedzo, Northwest District Technical Manager

Emulsified Zero-Valent Iron (EZVI): A Combination Technology for ISCR Source Zone Remediation

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

In-situ Remediation Lessons Learned

Enhanced Bioremediation Field Experience: Using Observed half Lives in Design and Prediction

BASICS OF PETROLEUM REMEDIATION Rick Fraxedas, PE. October 2, 2009

Emulsified Zero-Valent Iron (EZVI): A Combination Technology for Source Zone Remediation

Presenters' Contact Information

In Situ Chemical Reduction of CVOCs and Chromium Facilitated Redevelopment of an Industrial Property

Full-Scale ISCR and EISB to Treat Chlorinated Solvents in Unsaturated Soils at a Former Chlorinated Solvents Manufacturing Plant

Use of Remox SR+ Cylinders in Treatment for Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater. Grant Walsom XCG. SMART Remediation Ottawa, ON February 15, 2018

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Name and Location: Description: Historical activity that resulted in contamination.

Alternative Cleanup Methods for Chlorinated VOCs

State of the Practice versus State of the Art in Chemical Oxidation / Reduction Technologies.

Remediation of 1, 4-Dioxane

Anaerobic Benzene Biodegradation - Insights from Treatability Studies and Molecular Tools. Sandra Dworatzek

Lance I. Robinson, PE

Terra Systems Capabilities Document Research Product Development Manufacturing Distribution

ORIN Remediation Technologies Chemical Treatments

Catalyzed Persulfate Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds in Soil

Bioremediation of Comingled 1,4-Dioxane and Chlorinated Solvent Plumes

Phytoremediation Technology Evaluation and Preliminary Design

BASICS OF PETROLEUM REMEDIATION Geoff Schaefer, PE. October 29, 2009

THE USE OF VEGETABLE OIL SUBSTRATE S IN THE TREATMENT OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

An Investigation on Remediation of Transformer Oil Contaminated Soil by Chemical Oxidation Using Hydrogen Peroxide

CASE STUDY COMPARISON OF MULTIPLE ACTIVATION METHODS FOR SODIUM PERSULFATE ISCO TREATMENT

Vertex Environmental Inc.

IN-SITU BIOLOGICALLY MEDIATED REMEDIATION. Margy Gentile September 30, 2016

Bioremediation Approaches and Tools for Anaerobic Benzene Remediation. Sandra Dworatzek SiREM. SMART Remediation Toronto, ON January 26, 2017

Case Study Catalyzed Hydrogen Peroxide Treatment of a TCE DNAPL Plume

Beyond Dig and Haul: A survey of Remedial Technologies. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation

Bioremediation Approaches and Tools for Anaerobic Benzene Remediation. SMART Remediation Ottawa, ON February 16, 2017

In Situ Chemical Reduction (ISCR) Fundamentals related to selection, design and distribution of ISCR technologies at contaminated sites

Enhanced Bio Remediation of Heavy PHCs and PAHs Through Dedicated Endogenous Micro Organisms Biostimulation. Charles Lamontagne Chemco, Inc.

Environmental Solutions. Klozur CR. Combined Chemical and Bio-Remediation

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY - GEOL 406/506

Plume Cut-Off Treatment Example

Recent Field Applications of Activated Persulfate Including Petroleum Sites

S-ISCO REMEDIATION OF COAL TAR

Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater Using Edible Oil Substrate EOS

Annemarie L. Douglas, Ph.D. R&D Coordinator HydroQual Laboratories Ltd.

Treatability Testing--Fate of Chromium During Oxidation of Chlorinated Solvents

Dr. Henning Wallner. Soil Contamination Study Meeting. Antalya. March 22 nd 2017

James Studer, 2 Barry Ronellenfitch, 2 Adam Mabbott, 2 Heather Murdoch, 2 Greg Whyte, and 3 Ian Hakes. REMTECH 2008 at Banff, Alberta

Overburden and Bedrock Remediation Using Activated Carbon Based Injectates. Mike Mazzarese AST Environmental, Inc.

Zero-Valent Iron for Groundwater Remediation Lessons Learned over 20 years of Technology Use. Andrzej Przepiora and Jeff Roberts

FIELD IMPLIMENTATION OF ANAEROBIC DECHLORINATION UTILIZING ZERO-VALENT IRON WITH AN ORGANIC HYDROGEN DONOR

Biological Treatment of Residual DNAPL

Kentucky and Beyond BOS 200 Success Story. The RPI Group Approach to In-situ Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation

4 major challenges in the source zone!!! Source Zone Remediation with innovative Technologies. Very large reductions wanted/needed

Delivery Approaches for Groundwater Amendments

Transcription:

Tools and Methods to Reduce Uncertainties Associated with the Use of In Situ Remediation Techniques for Organic Contaminants in Soil and Groundwater by Jean Paré, P. Eng. Toronto, ON July 15 th, 2017

The Chemistry works but the geology screws it up by Jean Paré, P. Eng. Toronto, ON July 15 th, 2017

Presentation Agenda In Situ Technology Review and Limitations Field application challenges and contact issue Tools, testing and tricks Before you get to the field When you re in the field Follow up After injection events Case Study Presentation Chemco-inc.com

In Situ Technology Key Drivers Time versus Money Contaminant Accessibility (infrastructures, utilities) Sustainability Contribution (remote disposal site, landfilling without treatment, Energy Output) Polishing steps to achieve Risk Based Criteria Improvement of contaminant removal rate versus natural attenuation Chemco-inc.com

Chemical Oxidation Technology Review Oxidants are introduced or mixed into the soil and groundwater to attack the organic contaminants Chemical oxidation treatments are commonly used in potable and wastewater applications Oxidants are non-specific and will react with the targeted contaminants AND with the soil organic content a value called Soil Oxidant Demand - SOD. Chemical oxidation reactions involve the transfer of electrons and the breaking of chemical bonds Water is the carrier for the oxidants used in chemical oxidation (except for ozone) If you have enough oxidant present and sufficient time you will push reaction to FULL mineralization (CO2, H2O, Cl-) of the contaminant of concern Chemical oxidation can slow down the biological activity but will NOT sterilize the soil completely (potential benefit because of lower toxicity after the Chemical Oxidation is completed)

Chemical Oxidation Technology Review Common Chemical Oxidants Potassium or sodium permanganate Hydrogen Peroxide alone Catalyzed Hydrogen Peroxide Hydrogen Peroxide with iron (regular Fenton reagent reaction) Need to establish acidic conditions (ideal ph between 4 and 6) Modified Fenton Reagent with chelated metals (neutral ph) Ozone Ozone is a gas and must be produced on site The gas must be injected into the soil Persulfate Requires activation to generate free sulphate radicals. Heat, chelated metal, high ph, surface, organic or hydrogen peroxide can be used to activate the persulphate. Activation method can be adapted to site conditions. Percarbonate Requires activation to generate free radicals SAFETY NOTE: ALL THESE PRODUCTS REQUIRE ADEQUATE HANDLING PRATICES AND SAFETY EQUIPMENT.

Chemical Oxidation Limitations (1) All chemical oxidation reactions occur in the WATER or moisture phase (except for ozone) Kinetics of the chemical oxidation reaction is thus influence by the contaminant of concern solubility and availability in the groundwater or moisture phase Sorbed phase contamination might be challenging to remediate (less available) In NAPL containing sites, contamination can persist because of the highly hydrophobic properties of the chemicals that make up the NAPLs Injection technique must induce proper contact between the contaminant and the oxidant for a proper duration for the required reaction to occurs (kinetics)

Chemical Oxidation Limitations (2) All oxidants can change the oxidation state of metals and thus increase their solubility and mobility Metals of particular concern are: chrome, lead, uranium, selenium, vanadium In most of these cases, the metals will come back in their reduced state once all of the oxidant has been consumed by the environment Impurities contained in the oxidant must be evaluated In the case of arsenic, oxidation will help immobilizing the metal by reducing its solubility

Conditions for Selecting Chemical Oxidation Chemical Oxidation Applicability Limitation / Disadvantage s Possible Alternative Options Mobile NAPL Probably not the best choice High oxidant requirement ($) Liquid Extraction Thermal degradation Residual NAPL (10,000 s mg/kg) Yes, but difficult High oxidant requirement ($) Extraction with air/steam injection Thermal degradation High conc. in soil/groundwater (10 s 10000 s mg/kg) Yes, good conditions Normal considerations Extraction with air/steam injection Bioremediation Dissolved plume (< 1 mg/kg) Yes, but could be costly Higher cost due to SOD Bioremediation, Reactive barriers Source : ITRC 2004 NAPL: Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid

Compatibility oxidant/contaminant Contaminant/Oxydant MnO4 S2O8 SO4 * Fenton s Ozone Petroleum Hydrocarbon L G/E E E E BTEX L G G/E E E Phenols G L/G G/E E E 1 Polycyclic Aromatic L G E E E Hydrocarbon (PAH) MTBE L L/G E G G Chlorinated Ethenes E G E E E (PCE, TCE, DCE, VC) Carbon Tetrachloride L G L/G L/G L/G Chlorinated Ethanes L G G/E G/E G (TCA, DCA) Polychlorinated L L L G/E G 1 Biphenyls (PCB) Energetics (RDX, HMX) E G E E E L=Low G=Good E=Excellent 1=Perozone Source: Carus Chemical Company

Enhanced Bioremediation Advantages Enhances natural in-situ processes already at play (typically uses natural groundwater gradient, naturally occurring biodegradation. Low energy and cost effective Relatively easy to manage and handle. Can be used in tandem with other remedial technologies that address small amounts of residual soil and groundwater contamination

Parameters to consider for a successful enhanced bioremediation Temperature, ph Nutrients Balance (C:N:P ratio) Site geology and hydrogeology consideration Proper micro-organisms presence Aerobic or anaerobic conditions to support bioremediation in soil and groundwater.

Chemical Reduction Principles In situ // Ex situ In Situ Chemical Reduction (ISCR) is defined as a process that combines biotic and abiotic reactions to treat contaminants by creating reducing conditions ISCR can be enhanced by anaerobic bioremediation ISCR also provides abiotic/chemical degradation component if a metal (zero valent iron or other) is present

Chemical Reduction Compatibility reductant/contaminant Chlorinated Compounds PCE, TCE, cdce, 11DCE, VC 1122TeCA, 111TCA, 12DCA CT, CF, DCM, CM Herbicides, Pesticides Toxaphene, Chlordane, Dieldrin, Pentachlorophenol Energetics TNT, DNT, RDX, HMX, Perchlorate Metals and metalloids As, Cr, Pb, Zn, Cd, Hg, Cu, Cr, Ni, Sb, Co Under aerobic conditions you can target HAP, phtalates, perchlorate, petroleum hydrocarbon In Red: need to have an organic substrate and/or a ZVI/carbon combination

Common Chemical Reducing Agents Sugars Molasses high fructose corn syrup whey Fatty acids Lactate Butyrate propionate Emulsified Vegetable Oils Soybean Oil Complex Fermentable Carbon complex lecithine polylactate Zero Valent Iron (ZVI) Soluble Iron Compounds

Selection Factors Chemical Reductant ORP of the aquifer Hydrogen vs. Acidity produced Biodegradation rate / longevity Ease of injection and distribution

Soil Washing Technology Review Organic Contaminants (Petroleum hydrocarbon, PCB, Dioxin, Furans, etc.) are entrapped as pure product (free phase) or at high concentration in various soil matrix. Highly contaminated soils are bringing challenges for an effective low cost remediation. Soil Washing using co-solvent and/or surfactant offers the benefit to treat effectively and economically these high contaminant concentration that allow for soil to be re-used or dispose at a lower cost.

Activated Carbon Technology Review Contaminants sorb to activated carbon Decreases groundwater mass immediately Disrupts groundwater/soil mass equilibrium to help drive desorption Concentrated mass accelerates degradation rates Various degradation mechanisms are used to treat Bioremediation (aerobic/anaerobic) Chemical reduction/oxidation Source: AST

Field application challenges and contact issue Good treatment require good contact Application challenges Geology (Silts and Clays, Sands, gravel and other) Heterogeneity Low GW Velocity < Fracture Pressures High Volumes to inject Reagent Kinetics Depth - Shallow environment - Deep environment

Tools, testing and tricks Before you get to the field Validating the qualification and quantification of the selected amendment with bench scale lab study Soil and Groundwater amendment validation and treatability study are ALWAYS recommended (If it doesn't work in the lab in ideal contact conditions it WON T work in the field) Make sure you have all the necessary data and your injection plan is set properly Chemco-inc.com

Tools, testing and tricks Before you get to the field

Tools, testing and tricks When you re in the field Making sure you are injecting in the adequate zone SITE CHARACTERIZATION IS KEY Validating the distribution and dilution of the amendment in the subsurface aquifer through the use of an INERT tracer PRIOR to moving in with your expensive oxidant or amendment. Evaluate the pro and cons of the various equipment and techniques to induce proper contact Confirm Injection Pressure and Flow Assumptions Confirm Formation Acceptance of Design Volume Confirm Vertical and Horizontal Distribution of Reagents Over Time

Tools, testing and tricks Search and Destroy Methodology Targeted Distribution Data Gap Analysis High Resolution Characterizatio n 3D Graphing & Conceptual Model Technology Selection High Resolution Remediation Design Distribution Testing Optimized Full Scale Application Troubleshooting Source Cascade Drilling 23

Search - Why MIP/HPT or LIF before injecting? Locate contaminant mass through high vertical resolution Define injection flows and pressures Don t get fooled by tight sands or clays with low conductivity

MIP 3D Imaging Injection Locations

Radius of Influence (ROI) Pore Volume ROI ROI Reagent Per Location 500 gals Injection Volume as a % of Effective Pore Volume 100% Pore Volume ROI 2 feet Advection / Dispersion ROI + = Additional ROI from Advection / Dispersion (Feet) Time Frame To Achieve Advection / Dispersion ROI (Days) 60 days 9 feet 7 feet 60 Days 4 10 ROI = P ROI + A/D ROI ROI = pore volume ROI (ft) + advection/dispersion ROI (ft) 9 feet = 2 feet + 7 feet @ 60 days Kinetics > ROI T

ROI Realities Pore Volume ROI ROI Reagent Per Location 500 gals Injection Volume as a % of Effective Pore Volume 50% Pore Volume ROI 2 feet Advection / Dispersion ROI Additional ROI from Advection / Dispersion (Feet) Time Frame To Achieve Advection / Dispersion ROI (Days) 60 days 9 feet 7 feet 60 Days Tight Soils Low Injection Pore Volumes Tighter Spacing Higher Reagent Concentrations Permeable Soils / Flat Gradient Reagent Persistence Requires High Injection Pore Volume Exceed Fracture Pressure Stay Below Fracture Pressure Permeable Soils / Steep Gradient Lower Residence Time

Tools, testing and tricks Search and Destroy Methodology Targeted Distribution Data Gap Analysis High Resolution Characterizatio n 3D Graphing & Conceptual Model Technology Selection High Resolution Remediation Design Distribution Testing Optimized Full Scale Application Troubleshooting ROI Injection Volumes Pressure Delivery Tooling Source Cascade Drilling

Tools, testing and tricks Follow up After injection events Validate oxidant/amendment distribution (may integrate inert tracer to evaluate dilution factor) with : Core samples Hydro punch sampling Electrical Conductivity Groundwater sampling through monitoring wells

Case Study 1 - Outputs Visual Data Dry Cleaner Case Study Injection Strategic Injection Strategy Source: Cascade Drilling

Case Study 1 - Outputs Visual Data MIP Post Injection Injection Pre-Injection MIP Strategic Injection Strategy Post-Injection MIP Source: Cascade Drilling

About our Expertise, Products and Services Training and Education: technical transfer session, health and safety training; Technology Site Assessment: technology support and selection (chemical oxidation, co solvent-surfactant soil washing and enhanced bioremediation); Products supply, logistic and storage: nutrients, bacterial preparations strains, oxidants, catalysts, oxygen and hydrogen release compounds, co solvent-surfactant blends Laboratory Services and Analysis: Groundwater Parameter Analysis, Tracer Study, Soil and Groundwater Oxidant Demand Evaluation (SOD), Bench Scale Treatability testing.

Acknowledgements Carus Chemical AST EOS Peroxychem Progressive Engineering & Construction Vertex Environmental Inc. Cascade Drilling Thank you for your attention! Have a good day!!! E-mail: jean.pare@chemco-inc.com Tel: 418-953-3480 // 800-575-5422 Chemco-inc.com