DEVELOPMENT REPORT UNION PACIFIC PROPERTY SAN ANTONO INTERMODAL YARD AREA

Similar documents
DEVELOPMENT REPORT UNION PACIFIC PROPERTY SAN ANTONO INTERMODAL YARD AREA

DEVELOPMENT REPORT UNION PACIFIC PROPERTY SAN ANTONO INTERMODAL YARD AREA

Walker County Manufactured Home Rental Community Regulations Infrastructure Development Plan

APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PERMIT

CITY OF ANGLETON MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN PHASE I EVALUATION & PRELIMINARY REPORT

MEDIO CREEK BUSINESS PARK

CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECKLIST

SECTION 12 STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 11, 2013

UNIVERSITY OF OREGON NORTH CAMPUS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROJECT Draft Conditional Use Permit Stormwater, Sanitary Sewer, and Water Analysis Report

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: June 4, 2015

Yorkton Rona Commercial and Industrial development. Concept Plan and Serviceability Report

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) POLICY

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Executive Summary C ITY OF ENNIS, TEXAS

YOUR GATEWAY TO GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION

YOUR GATEWAY TO GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION

TES Industrial Development SW ¼ SEC Lacombe County Outline Plan

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: February 7, 2013

HAROLD L. MOSELEY SUBDIVISION, RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 2

iswm TM Criteria Manual City of Azle Section 14 City of Azle Subdivision Ordinance DRAFT-June Chapter 1

MOBILE SOUTH BUSINESS PARK SUBDIVISION, UNIT ONE, RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 2, 3 & 4 OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 4 & 12

FEE SCHEDULE 7 Water Development and Connection Fees Aurora Water (Platted Before January 1, 2017)

ZONING AMENDMENT, PUD & PLANNING APPROAVAL STAFF REPORT Date: May 4, 2006

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts

LOT GRADING. LOT GRADING REQUIREMENTS The following lot grading requirements came into effect on May 1, 2007:

SECTION 1 - TRANSPORTATION NETWORK SECTION 2 - SITE INFORMATION

CHAPTER 17: STORM SEWER STANDARDS Introduction Administration Standards 17.1

Functional Servicing Report. Winston Park West Proposed Business Park Development Project. Infrastructure Ontario (IO) September MU1

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ($ Thousands) CITY OF HOUSTON - STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. M - Page 25 of 37. Proposed CIP

Stormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans)

TxDOT Houston District Permit Requirements (Information contained herein is subject to change)

Drainage Report. New Braunfels Municipal Airport. Master Plan Update 2005

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision

SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST. Subdivision Name. Prior To Review. Preliminary plan approved by Planning Commission / Council as required.

Ingham County Drain Commissioner Patrick E. Lindemann 707 BUHL AVENUE P. O. BOX 220 MASON MI PH. (517) FAX (517)

HIGH SCHOOL #2 Severance, CO MANAGEMENT PLAN November,

Menomonie Industry Park

WESTERN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, Inc LLC

Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision

2. DEFINITIONS. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

For Public Input Period

XI. Thornton Planning Area

Calculating System Development Charges for Stormwater Facilities

IOWA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SUMMARY

SPECIAL PROVISION Detours, Barricades, Warning Signs, Sequence of Work, etc.

Design Specifications & Requirements Manual

Ordinance No Lot Surface Drainage

April 12, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting. Landfill Energy Systems

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONED UNINCORPORATED AREAS ARTICLE 1500 OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 149 ARTICLE 1500 DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWERS

Zoning Permits 11-1 ZONING PERMITS

Land Use Assumptions Technical Memorandum

Index. Composition and Order of Plan Set. Utility Plan... 5

SECONDARY WETLAND IMPACTS ANALYSIS

5.1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT FACILITIES AND SERVICES

Planned Unit Development Overlay District. For. Lloyd Tract PUD

CITY OF HILSHIRE VILLAGE SWIMMING POOL PLAN SUBMITTAL CHECK LIST ADDRESS: DATE:

CITY OF LA MARQUE, TEXAS CHAPTER 3 WATER SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA

Chapter 4. Drainage Report and Construction Drawing Submittal Requirements

SAMPLE DRAINAGE STATEMENT

SECTION 3 DRAINAGE. 3-1 General. 3-2 Drainage Ordinances and Legal Requirements

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

CPC GPA-ZC-HD-CU-CUB-ZAI-SPR T-1 CONDITIONS FOR EFFECTUATING TENTATIVE (T) CLASSIFICATION REMOVAL

Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Statement of Policy for Maintenance of Stormwater Sewer Systems

SECTION 6.0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project

ELDERBERRY CUSA EXPANSION SUMMARY INFORMATION

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

TOWN OF MANCHESTER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Subdivision Application Minimum Submission Requirements

Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 04 REGULATION OF WATER SUPPLY, SEWAGE DISPOSAL, AND SOLID WASTE

Chapter 8-Sanitary Sewer

Review of Plans and Specs from a Constructability Perspective

65 East Project (P18-045) Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report

City of Maize Industrial Park Phase III Report Infrastructure Assessment December 16, Maize Land Use Study

Water and Wastewater Facilities Land Use Assumptions Plan, Capital Improvements Plan, and Maximum Impact Fees Study. San Antonio Water System

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

CHAPTER 5 WATER SYSTEM DESIGN STANDARDS

Keys Edge Community Development District. Engineer s Report Infrastructure Improvements

WESTERN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, Inc LLC

City of Robbinsdale, Minnesota Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)

DESIGN GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL A. Slope Criteria

ARTICLE 700 LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENTS

Design Specifications & Requirements Manual

Chapter 3: Permit Procedures and Requirements

RIPON MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLAN

OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN. PART B.9 Fleet Street Business Park Secondary Plan

DR DRAINAGEWAY THORNTON VALLEY SUBDIVISION OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SWC OF COLO BLVD & THORNTON PKWY THORNTON, CO

CHURCHILL DOWNS SUBDIVISION, 2 ND UNIT, RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS

5/25/2017. Lumpkin Detention Basin Houston, Texas By Brian Whitney, P.E., CFM Victor Rendon. Lumpkin Basin. Lumpkin Road Overall Description

PARISH OF ASCENSION OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT

APPLICATION FOR A SITE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT

PLAN CHECK GUIDELINES MULTI-FAMILY/COMMERCIAL

Engineer s Report Infrastructure Improvements

STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT

3.0 Planning and Submittal Requirements

STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT

Submitted to: Mr. Jim Dunn Chesterfield County Economic Development Department 9401 Courthouse Road - Suite B Chesterfield, VA 23830

MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS REVISIONS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 103D.341. Adopted April 24, 2014 Effective June 6, 2014

SECTION STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, GRADING, AND WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 402 STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 400-1

Chapter 4. Drainage Report and Construction Drawing Submittal Requirements

Transcription:

DEVELOPMENT REPORT UNION PACIFIC PROPERTY SAN ANTONO INTERMODAL YARD AREA This report was prepared to present development information (Utility availability, Development Regulations, Flood Plain information, etc.) on property owned by Union Pacific Railroad in the area of their Intermodal Yard in southwest Bexar County. For purposes of this report the property has been divided into three tracts known as the North, Center, and South Tracts. These divisions were made due to barriers such as roadways or other facilities that separate the areas. DESCRIPTION: CENTER TRACT The Center tract is bordered on the north by FM 2356 (Pearsall Road), on the west by an adjacent residential area, on the south by the Medina River and on the east by the proposed Union Pacific Spine Road connecting the Intermodal Yard to Pearsall Road. The tract contains approximately 215.2 acres excluding the roadway. The property is currently being farmed. Three exhibits showing this tract are attached to this report. Exhibit C-1 shows the tract boundary along with proposed flood plains, potential roadways, a potential rail spur, potential detention ponds, and acreages. Exhibit C-2 is similar to Exhibit C-1 except that the potential roadways have been removed. Exhibit C-3 shows aerial topography for the tract. The topography shows one foot contours which were obtained during the Intermodal Yard design. Gross acreage of this tract is 215.2 +/- acres less 15 acres for detention basins results in a Net Acreage of 200.2 +/- acres. The detention basin area assumes that basin(s) six feet deep could be developed. The proposed Spine Roadway along the eastern side of the tract is not included in the acreage calculations. UTILITIES Electricity: The site is served by City Public Service (CPS), the City of San Antonio s Municipal Gas and Electric Utility. There are three phase overhead electric lines along the south side of FM 2536 for the eastern half of the tract s frontage on FM 2356. Three phase power has also been extended south along the west side of the future Spine Road to serve the Intermodal Yard. In addition there are three phase overhead lines located just south of the tract. These lines serve Bexar Metropolitan Water District s Pump station and are fed from a different substation. These lines could allow for dual feed service to proposed development. Electric service is available in accordance with CPS Regulations. 1

Water: The majority of the site is located in San Antonio Water System s Service Area. The nearest SAWS main is a 12 main located at the entrance to the Union Pacific Intermodal Terminal. Following the alignment of the proposed Spine Road the water line is approximately 4,700 feet from the southeast corner of the Center tract. In addition there is a project underway which will bring a 36 water main down Pearsall Road to a point approximately 8,200 feet east of the northeast corner of this tract. SAWS Capital Projects Plan currently shows a proposed main along this section of Pearsall Road. When a developer has to extend a main shown on the Capital Plan SAWS may elect to participate in the construction or the developer may be required to fund the entire cost with SAWS issuing credits towards the additional cost of the main required by SAWS over the cost of the main required by the development. These credits can be used to pay impact fees (with the exception of water supply fees) and may be sold to other developers. The Capital Plan does not include a main through the Union Pacific Property. SAWS is also in the design stage of a project which will construct a 42 +/- water transmission main along an alignment north of Nelson Road. At this time it is not known whether this will be available to support local distribution mains. To obtain water service SAWS will require execution of a Utility Service Agreement. This agreement details what improvements will be required to serve a tract and to what extent and under what conditions SAWS would participate or provide credits for the cost of main extensions. Application for Water Service will require submission of a proposed development plan and water demand calculations. In discussions with SAWS on the extension of water service to the Intermodal Yard SAWS initially required a main extension north from IH 35 to Pearsall Road. This requirement was removed since the line would not have had any customers to prevent stagnation of the water. It is likely that SAWS would require that extension as part of any development of this tract. In addition to main extension costs impact fees are required when meters are applied for. Fee schedules are available at www.saws.org. A small portion of the property along the east bank of the Medina River is in the Atascosa Rural Water Supply Corporation (ARWSC) Service Area. As its name implies ARWSC primarily serves a rural clientele and does not have the capacity to serve industrial development on this tract. Should water service be needed in their service area it would likely be necessary to obtain an agreement allowing SAWS to serve the area. 2

Sewer: The site is located in the San Antonio Water System s Sewer Service Area. SAWS has a project under design called the Medina River Outfall which, when completed, will make sewer service available, subject to SAWS regulations, to properties along the Medina River. SAWS is currently in negotiations with Union Pacific to acquire an easement through this tract for the referenced line. The alignment preferred by SAWS is shown on the attached exhibits. Subject to being able to acquire the required easement the outfall should be completed by late 2013. In discussions between SAWS and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) representatives, SAWS personnel advised UPRR that sewer service connections could be made at manholes which are anticipated to be approximately one thousand feet apart. The adjacent Intermodal Yard has a private lift station and service is not available through that facility. As with water service SAWS requires a Utility Service Agreement as a condition to obtaining sewer service. In addition to main extension costs impact fees are required for sewer service. Fee schedules are available at www.saws.org. For limited development it may be possible to utilize onsite wastewater treatment facilities if the Medina River Outfall has not been completed. Gas: City Public Service (CPS) does not have any gas service available in this immediate area. To extend a gas main to the FM 2356 frontage a main could be extended from Loop 410 and FM 2356 (a distance of 11,300 +/- feet. Extending a gas main to the south side of the site could be accomplished by extending a main southwesterly along IH 35 from Fischer Road and then following the Intermodal Access Road and proposed Spine Road alignment. That distance is 13,300 +/- feet. CPS does have a policy of subsidizing the cost of gas main extensions. The amount of subsidy depends on the anticipated gas usage. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS This property is located in the extra territorial jurisdiction of the City of San Antonio and is also located in Bexar County. Issuance of any building permit or sale of tracts would require that a subdivision plat be prepared and processed through both the City and Bexar County. The county will handle primary review for drainage and flood plain issues while the City will review land planning, tree preservation and other issues. Phased or partial development will require the processing of a Master Development Plan through the City. A Master Development Plan lays out how the property will be developed and addresses issues such as drainage, street layout, and traffic. 3

Building Permits will be processed through Bexar County. The permit process in the County primarily focuses on life safety issues The County does not have any land use regulations and the City s zoning does not extend into the county so there are no regulatory restrictions on land use. There is a water treatment plant intake on the Medina River immediately south of this tract and any development that would involve hazardous materials would likely be subject to increased scrutiny. The intake supplies water to a treatment plant owned by an affiliate of the Bexar Metropolitan Water District. The City s Tree Preservation Ordinance applies in the ETJ so any development will need to comply with Tree Preservation and Canopy requirements. Development of the Intermodal Yard included preserving an area of trees along the west side of this tract and adjacent to the Medina River Flood Plain. Unless modified by a new tree Preservation Plan those areas must remain protected. As part of the platting process the City of San Antonio requires TxDOT to review and approve the plat. During that process TxDOT determines whether they need additional right-of-way. On nearby plats TxDOT has requested that a ten foot wide right-of-way reservation be provided adjacent to the current right-of-way. TxDOT cannot require a dedication because the current right-of-way exceeds the City s requirements. They can require the reservation which makes the land available for their future purchase. FLOOD PLAIN DRAINAGE The City of San Antonio, Bexar County, and the San Antonio River Authority jointly sponsored an update of the FEMA Flood Plain Maps for Bexar County. The attached Flood Plain Exhibit shows the limits of the flood plain as proposed by this study. No part of the tract is in a regulatory flood plain. The maps showing this flood plain are expected to become effective the end of September, 2010. As part of their Unified Development Code the City of San Antonio requires that proposed development evaluate the impacts of their drainage on downstream development. If the evaluation shows that the development will not have an adverse impact the City rules allow payment of a fee in lieu of providing storm water detention. However, Bexar County does not participate in the fee and generally requires that storm water detention be provided for larger development. For planning purposes the required volume of detention facilities can be estimated as 0.4 acre feet of storage for each acre of development. The area required for detention will depend on the depth of the pond. For planning purposes a depth of four feet provides a required pond area of approximately one acre for each acre of development. 4

Based on a developable area of 215 acres the following table gives an estimate of the area required for detention basins of various depths. The actual area will depend on basin configuration, basin depth, type of development and other factors. Basin Depth Surface Area ACCESS 4 Feet 22 acres 5 Feet 18 acres 6 Feet 15 acres As shown on the attached topographic exhibit (C-3) the site generally slopes from northeast to southwest towards the Medina River. The southern boundary of this tract does not border the actual Medina River so any development plan that results in concentrated flow or pond outfalls would need to obtain drainage easements on the adjacent property. These easements would need to extend from the property to the river. Drainage of the tract could be accomplished by surface (earth or concrete channels) or subsurface (pipe) systems. All storm drain systems would need to be designed to City and County standards. This tract has frontage on FM 2356 which is a Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) controlled roadway and any driveways would need to be permitted through TxDOT. It should be noted that during the development of the Union Pacific Intermodal Yard the Southwest Independent School District (SWISD) was the catalyst in having Union Pacific Railroad relocate the access to the intermodal yard from FM 2356 to IH 35. Their concerns dealt with potential conflicts between truck traffic and school buses. SWISD utilizes FM 2356 as a major bus route since their Transportation Facility is located on Loop 410 just south of the FM 2356 intersection. Development with significant amounts of truck traffic will need to address the issue of possible conflicts with the buses. As part of the Intermodal Yard development the FM 2356 Bridge over the Union Pacific right-of-way was enlarged and space was left under the bridge for a roadway connecting this tract to the property south of FM 2356. A development with significant traffic might propose a roadway (as shown on Exhibit C-1) connecting to both sides of FM 2356 under this bridge to allow right in right out access to the property. This arrangement might satisfy the school district s concerns. The development of the Intermodal Yard included construction of a private roadway from IH 35 to the Intermodal Yard. This roadway is currently owned by Union Pacific but was designed to be converted into a public roadway to serve the Union Pacific Property. A roadway termed the Spine Road has been planned to extend north from the Intermodal Access Road to serve the South, Center, and potentially the North tract. The roadway 5

would involve a forty four foot wide roadway section in a seventy foot wide right-ofway. This roadway would also serve as a utility corridor for water, sewer, electric, gas and other utilities. An extension of this roadway could be made to serve development on this tract. Construction of this roadway would likely require storm drain improvements to convey runoff to the Medina River. As part of the platting process the City of San Antonio will require a Traffic Impact analysis. That analysis will determine the impact of any proposed development on roadways in the area. The development could be required to fund off-site roadway improvements if the analysis showed the projected traffic would degrade the level of service on the adjacent roadways. The City of San Antonio also requires TxDOT to review and approve the plat. During that process TxDOT determines whether they need additional right-of-way. On nearby plats TxDOT has requested that a ten foot wide right-of-way reservation be provided adjacent to the current right-of-way. TxDOT cannot require a dedication because the current right-of-way exceeds the City s requirements. They can require the reservation which makes the land available for their future purchase. RAIL ACCESS The attached exhibit (C-1) shows the potential for extension of rail service into the property from the lines entering the Intermodal Yard from UPRR s Del Rio tracks. Extension of rail service would require an agreement with Union Pacific. Where the tracks cross the Spine Road we would anticipate that crossing signals would be required. END OF CENTER TRACT 6