Anaerobic Digestion of Vegetable Waste

Similar documents
The Effect of Temperature on Methane Productivity of Municipal Solid Waste in Anaerobic Digester

Anaerobic slurry co-digestion of poultry manure and straw: effect of organic loading and temperature

Technical overview and benefits

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 3, No 1, Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.

(M.P.) , India, Corresponding author: Abstract

INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE VARIATION ON BIOGAS YIELD FROM INDUSTRIAL WASTES AND ENERGY PLANTS

IMPROVING THE BIOGAS APPLICATION IN THE MEKONG DELTA OF VIETNAM BY USING AGRICULTURAL WASTE AS AN ADDITIONAL INPUT MATERIAL

Anaerobic codigestion of sewage sludge and rice straw

Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Municipal Solid Waste using Different Innoculum Concentration on Batch Anaerobic Digestion

Biogas recovery from anaerobic digestion process of mixed fruit -vegetable wastes

Improvement Anaerobic Digestion performance of Sewage Sludge by Co-digestion with Cattle Manure Raouf Hassan

Asian Journal on Energy and Environment

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

Biogas Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Waste from Johannesburg Market

Determination of design criteria for UASB reactors as a wastewater pretreatment system in tropical small communities

Biogas Production from Municipal Solid Waste in Havana, Cuba

Production of Biogas from Organic Solid Waste in Thermophilic Phase

1. Introduction. 2. Material and methods. Soheil Farajzadehha 1+, Jalal Shayegan 2, S.A.Mirbagheri 1, Soroush Farajzadehha 4

KINETIC ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION OF UASB ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF A SYNTHETIC FRUIT WASTEWATER

Continuous co-digestion of aquatic weeds with food waste and the availability of digested effluent

Mesophilic, Thermophilic And Temperature Phased Anaerobic Digestion Of Waste Activated Sludge

Anaerobic Digestion of Vegetable Wastes for Biogas Production in a Fed-Batch Reactor

Effect of Feed Loading on Biogas Methane Production in Batch Mesophilic Anaerobic Digesters Treating Food Waste

Anaerobic co-digestion of tuna factory waste and banana crop residue for biogas production

21 st Annual National Compost Conference

Anaerobic process. An introduction. Ecochemicals UAB

ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION OF DAIRY MANURE WITH POTATO WASTE. Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 3

Performance of Temperature-Phased Anaerobic Digestion (TPAD) System Treating Dairy Cattle Wastes

The effect of distinct operational conditions on organic material removal and biogas production in the anaerobic treatment of cattle manure

336098: DYNAMIC MODELLING AND SIMULATION OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTER FOR HIGH ORGANIC STRENGTH WASTE

USING GEOTEXTILE FILTER AS BIOFILM MEDIA IN ANAEROBIC LANDFILL BIOREACTOR

Steven Dickey. Abstract

ScienceDirect. Anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste to produce biogas

PRODUCTION OF BIOGAS THROUGH ANAEROBIC CO- FERMENTATION OF CATTLE SLURRY WITH BISCUIT WASTE

Anaerobic Digestion in Orkney Pros and Cons

Biogas Production From Raw Palm Oil Mill Effluent Using A Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Hybrid Reactor

Biogas Production from Vegetable Waste by using Dog and Cattle Manure

Co Digestion Food Waste with Cow Manure for Efficient Biogas Generation

Bio-drying Municipal Solid Waste in a rotary Drum Reactor. The effect of Biomass Temperature and Inoculation

What type of Digester Configurations should be employed to produce Biomethane from Grass Silage?

KINETIC STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF WATER HYACINTHS IN FOODWASTE BIOGAS PRODUCTION

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 3, No 3, Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.

Environmental Science

Disposal of Sludge with Solid Wastes in Aerobic and Anaerobic Landfill Areas

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY EXPANSION TACTICS IN THE SUB-SAHARA BOTSWANA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADVANCED BIOGAS DIGESTER

COD REMOVAL OF CARDBOARD FACTORY WASTEWATER BY UPFLOW ANAEROBIC FILTER

Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co. Ltd. Operation Manual Of PUXIN Portable Biogas Plant 1.2m3

An application of anaerobic baffled reactor to produce biogas from kitchen waste

Review of composting and anaerobic digestion of MSW & a methodological proposal for a mid-size city

Anaerobic Digestion not just biogas production. FARM BIOGAS Methane consulting cc

HIGH-SOLIDS ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF SEWAGE SLUDGE IN CHINA

The Effect of Temperature on the biogas Production from Olive Pomace

Keywords Anaerobic Digestion (AD), Ammonia, biogas, stripping, source-segregated food waste (SSFW)

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FLUSHED DAIRY MANURE

[Oviya*, 5(4): April, 2016] ISSN: (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785

The Biology of Composting

Anaerobic Processing Principles & Technologies. Endeco

The application of an anaerobic baffled reactor to produce biogas from kitchen waste

SEPARATE PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN AND METHANE FROM ETHANOL WASTEWATER USING TWO-STAGE UASB SYSTEM

THERMOPHILIC SOLID STATE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF OFMSW IN SEQUENTIAL BATCH REACTORS

CHAPTER THREE EFFECT OF TOTAL SOLIDS ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

High Solids Anaerobic Digestion for Energy and Nutrient Recovery

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF TWO - PHASE OLIVE MILL SOLID WASTES

ABE 482 Environmental Engineering in Biosystems. September 22 Lecture 8

Production of Bioenergy Using Filter Cake Mud in Sugar Cane Mill Factories

TWO STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OVER SINGLE STAGE ON BIOGAS YIELDS EDIBLE AND NON-EDIBLE DE-OILEDD CAKES UNDER THE EFFECT OF SINGLE CO-DIGESTION SYSTEM

Keywords: UASB reactors, Co-digestion, Seasonal variation INTRODUCTION. Jens Ejbye Schmidt"' and Birgitte Kiar Ahring"'

Water and Wastewater Engineering Dr. Ligy Philip Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Anaerobic Fermentation of Organic Solid Wastes: Volatile Fatty Acid Production and Separation

Squeezing wastes in a wastewater treatment plant

Acclimatization and Performance Study of Acidogenesis Anaerobic Degradation Process for Palm Oil Mill Effluent

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 89 (2016 ) 78 84

Use of Two Phase Anaerobic Bioprocess Configuration

Anaerobic Digestion Fundamentals

Anaerobic Digestion of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW): Full scale vs Laboratory Results

Making Waste Productive. Creating Energy from Waste

Biochemical Methane Potential Test for Biogas Production from Agricultural Waste Co-Digested with Domestic Sewage

Combination of thermal treatments and anaerobic digestion to reduce sewage sludge quantity and improve biogaz yield

Biofuel Generation from Grass

Introduction into Digester Biology

Removal of Heavy Metal from Landfill Leachate Using Vertical Flow Construction Wetland

Biogas production through Co-digestion of palm oil mill effluent with cow manure

Simultaneous treatment of sewage sludge and food waste by the unified high-rate anaerobic digestion system

UMWEKO GmbH, Dr Konrad Schleiss

Best Available Techniques in Pyrolysis and Anaerobic Digestion. EBIMUN interregional meeting Tartu (Estonia) 29-30th September 2011 Julio Fierro

Biodegradation of Agro-industrial Waste *

A techno-economical case study of a thermophylic anaerobic digestion plant in Attica Region, Greece

Study of Biodegradability of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solids Waste

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION BASIC CONCEPTS

Qualitative and Quantitative Feasibility of Biogas Production from Kitchen Waste

UASB. Performance of the UASB Pilot Scale Reactor in Treating MSW Leachate in the Hot Climate City of Ahvaz

Anaerobic digestion = biogas process

Aerobic biological treatment of thermophilically digested sludge

Today s Need & Requirement of Biogas Plant s (Green-Energy)

EFFECT OF LEACHATE RECIRCULATION ON ORGANIC WASTE AND LEACHATE STABILIZATION IN ANAEROBIC BIOREACTOR

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Straw for Methane Production

Scientific Research Journal Vol. 11 No. 2, 2014

Influence of Inoculum Content on Performance of Anaerobic Reactors for Treating Cattle Manure using Rumen Fluid Inoculum

Anaerobic Digestion (AD)

Transcription:

Anaerobic Digestion of Vegetable Waste Azadeh Babaee, Jalal Shayegan * School of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran shayegan@sharif.edu Fruit and vegetable wastes are produced in large quantities in Iran, and constitute a source of nuisance in municipal landfills. The objective of this study was to optimize the applications of anaerobic digestion for the treatment of municipal organic wastes. We studied the effect of organic loading rates on anaerobic digestion of vegetable wastes. The complete-mix, pilot-scale digester with working volume of 70 l was used. The experiments were conducted at 34ºC with a fixed hydraulic retention time of 25 days. The digester was operated at different organic feeding rates of 1.4, 2 and 2.75 kg VS/(m 3.d). The biogas produced had methane composition of 49.7-64% and biogas production rates of 0.12-0.4 m 3 /(kg VS). The reactor showed stable performance with highest biogas production (0.4 m 3 /kg VS) and VS reduction of around 88% during loading rate of 1.4 kg VS/(m3.d). The chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction, VS removal and methane concentration in biogas was decreased when the organic loading rate was increased. Based on the data obtained from this study, OLR of 1.4kg VS/(m 3.d) is suggested as design criteria with biogas production rate of 0.4 m 3 biogas/(kg VS). 1. Introduction Fruit and vegetable wastes are produced in large quantities in markets, and constitute a source of nuisance in municipal landfills because of their high biodegradability (Viturtia et al., 1989). The amount of MSW generated in the Tehran is around 4000 ton/day, and contains more than 70% of organic wastes. The easy biodegradable organic matter content of vegetables waste with high moisture facilitates their biological treatment and shows the trend of these wastes for anaerobic digestion (Bouallagui et al., 2003). Anaerobic digestion is becoming more and more attractive for the treatment of high strength organic wastes such as municipal solid waste, since it produces renewable energy, methane, and valuable digested residues, liquid fertilizer and soil conditioner (Angelidaki and Ahring, 1994). There are a large number of factors which affect biogas production efficiency such as environmental conditions like ph, temperature, inhibitory parameters like high organic loading, etc. Volatile solids input, digester temperature and retention time are operational parameter that have a strong effect on digester performance (Forster et al., 2008). Since municipal waste characteristics various from country to country as well as other operating conditions, pilot-scale experiments are required to obtain suitable design criteria. The aims of this study were to investigate the

influence of OLR on performance and treatment efficiency (based on volatile solids removal) of vegetable waste digestion in semi continuous slurry digester. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1 Experimental layout The digester experiments were carried out in a semi-continuously pilot-scale with a total volume of 70 L. Fig.1 illustrates the experimental set-up. The reactor was fitted with a top plate, which supported the mixer, mixer motor, gas sampler. Sampling ports and effluent valves were located at positions corresponding to the top, middle and bottom layer of digester contents. The reactor had one outlet at the bottom for effluent removal. The contents of the reactor were mixed as controlled by a timer, which was activated for 15min every 45 minutes. Reactor temperature was maintained at 34 ºC. 2.2 Waste characteristics The vegetables wastes were collected from food markets in Tehran every week. The total initial solid concentration of vegetables waste was 8%, with a total volatile solids (VS) content of about 97%. The COD/N ratio of vegetables waste is balanced, being around 30 and therefore, no nitrogen was added to the reactor. In fact the optimum C:N ratio for microbial activity involved in bioconversion of vegetable biomasses to methane is 25-30 (Kivaisi and Mtila, 1998). The anaerobic sludge from Ekbatan wastewater treatment plant was added as seed. 2.3 Anaerobic digester operation Experiments were operated in semi-continuous mode with daily feeding. Dry semicontinuous anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste was investigated in mesophilic condition with three different organic loading rates (OLR) of 1.4, 2 and 2.75 kgvs/(m 3.d) for constant retention time of 25 days. Retention time of 25 days was maintained by feeding 2.4 L of substrate and removing 2.4 L of effluent daily. Steadystate condition was identified when the COD value of the effluent and daily biogas production was measured to be the same for two or three consecutive days. Table 1 shows the characteristics of each feeding rate. 2.4 Analytical methods Biogas production, Methane content in biogas and process parameters such as ph, TS, VS, alkalinity and ammonium nitrogen were followed on daily basis. Methane content in biogas was measured by gas chromatograph. TS, VS, alkalinity and PH were determined according to Standard Methods (APHA, 1998). Table 1: Characteristics of each feeding rate Total solids (%) Volatile solids (%) Organic loading rate (kg VS/m 3.d) Wet waste (kg/d) Inlet COD (mg/l) Loading 1 8 97 1.4 1 2150 Loading 2 8.6 97 2 1.5 3300 Loading 3 8.5 97 2.75 2 4100

Figure 1: The experimental set-up 3. Results and Discussion 3.1 Biogas production and characterization One of the main objectives of this research was to determine the performance of the anaerobic digestion process when operated at different loading rates. For this reason, it was highly important to evaluate process performance in term of biogas composition and production to various loading rates. Production and composition of biogas during anaerobic process at different organic loading rates are shown in Fig. 2. Figure 2: The amount of biogas production and composition for various loading rates

Figure 3: Values of COD for various loading rates The biogas production at steady-state condition was found to be 33.3, 27.6 and 21.3 l/d in run 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Further increase of the organic feeding rate as 2kgVS/(m 3.d) results in decreased biogas production rates. The reactor showed stable performance with highest methane (64%) during loading rate of 1.4 kg VS/(m 3.d). Methane concentration in biogas was observed around 60% in run 2 whereas it was found less than 49.7% in run 3. The ph of effluent leachate from the digester remained steady state to the range of 7.75-8.0 during the run 1 (1.4 kg VS/m 3.d) which shows that the system was well buffered. When the loading rate was increased to 2.75 kgvs/(m 3.d), the ph value dropped from 7.75 and reached to lower value of 6.8. The methane content in the biogas dropped and the system showed sign of overloading. It was found that higher organic loading rates gave lower methane composition. Since the ph controlled by the volatile organic acids concentration, the alkalinity showed similar trends. This was result by immediately stopping the feeding and adding alkaline solution. But the condition could not be recovered during run 3. Figure 3 presents the variation of COD concentrations in leachate. In loading rate of 1.4 kg VS/(m 3.d), COD concentrations were found significantly decreased after the completion of the retention time. But COD in leachate were found at the higher concentrations in run 2 and 3 during the digestion. This can be explained that there was higher hydrolysis but less methanogenesis because hydrolytic bacteria are more robust to environmental condition. 3.2 Process efficiency For the purpose of evaluating the effect of loading rate on the performance of this system, VS reduction, and biogas yield were taken into account as the indicators to assess the reactor performance and efficiency of each loading rate. Volatile solid reduction was taken into account as well to evaluate the reactor performance and stability of the digestate. VS degradation value of 88 % was achieved when operating loading rate 1.4 kg VS/(m 3.d). While loading rate increased to 2 and 2.75 kgvs/(m 3.d), VS removal was decreased to 82% and 78% respectively as illustrated in Fig.4.

Figure 4: VS and COD degradation for various loading rates Comparably, this VS reduction was higher with result found by Castillo et al. (2006) who reported that VS reduction of 77.1% was obtained with the digestion time of 25 days. As the organic loading rate was increased, the COD degradation decreased. In run 1, the reactor stabilized and the COD of the effluent was further reduced to 65%, which corresponds to high purification efficiency of COD removal. To further the investigation, biogas yield for various loading rates is presented in Figure 5. The highest yield observed was 0.4 m 3 /kg VS in run 1 (1.4 kg VS/m 3.d). As the loading rate was increased, a gradual decrease in the biogas production (0.22 and 0.12m 3 /kg VS in run 2 and 3 respectively) was observed. The overloading was marked by the fall in ph and gas yield and increase of carbon dioxide content in the biogas. Figure 5: Biogas yield for various loading rates

In this study, the best results were obtained with an organic loading rate of 1.4kgVS/(m 3.d). It should be cautioned here that the optimum loading rate of 1.4kgVS/(m 3.d) observed here is not universal as the optimal rate depends upon the reactor configuration. 4. Conclusion The single-phase, complete-mix reactor is found to be technically feasible for vegetable wastes disposal. Considering the characteristics of the high-moisture solid waste, anaerobic digestion represents a feasible and effective method to convert the waste to biogas fuel. The reactor showed stable performance with highest methane (64%) with VS reduction of around 88% during loading rate of 1.4 kg VS/(m 3.d). Based on data from this study, OLR of 1.4 kg VS/(m 3.d) is suggested as design criteria with biogas production rate of 0.4 m 3 biogas/kg VS input. Successful implementation of anaerobic digestion as the method of waste treatment leads to the regional utilization of renewable energy resources, reducing energy requirements and costs. References Angelidaki I., Ahring B.K., 1994, Anaerobic thermophilic digestion of manure at different ammonia loads: Effect of temperature, Water Research, 28 (3), 727 731. APHA, 1998, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edition, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. Bouallagui H., Ben Cheikh R., Marouani L., Hamdi M., 2003, Mesopholic biogas production from fruit and vegetable waste in a tubular digester, Bioresource Technology, 86, 85 89. Castillo M.E.F., Cristancho D.E., Arellano V.A., 2006, Study the operational condition for anaerobic digestion of urban solid waste, Waste management, 26, 546-556. Forster- Carneiro T., Perez M., Romero L.I., 2008, Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes: Dry thermophilic performance, Bioresource Technology, 99, 8180-8184. Kivaisi AK., Mtila M., 1998, Production of biogas from water hyacinth in a two-stage bioreactor, World J Microbiol Biotechnology, 14, 125 131. Viturtia A., Mata-Alvarez J., Cecchi F., Fazzini G., 1989, Two-phase anaerobic digestion of a mixture of fruit and vegetable wastes, Biological Wastes, 29, 189 199.