PAKISTAN DEVELOPMENT FORUM 2010 RELIEF, EARLY RECOVERY AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION BY LT GEN (R) NADEEM AHMED CHAIRMAN NDMA 14 NOVEMBER 2010
2 SITUATIONAL BACKGROUND Population return started with improved accessibility Capacity enhancement for improved service delivery No outbreak of epidemic Infrastructural repairs in progress Distribution of Cash grants through WATAN Cards Draw down of Armed Forces as well as international aviation assets in progress Plans for Early Recovery under implementation
RELIEF PROVIDED VS NEEDS FOOD SHELTER WASH WATER 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 3
4 EARLY RECOVERY PRINCIPLES Coverage of worst affected areas Mapping of partners and activities to avoid duplication Key performance indicators identified to measure aid effectiveness through single reporting format Delivery enhancements through diversity of partners Monetization of area through cash based incentives
5 EARLY RECOVERY FOCUS SEP 2010 SEP 2011 Shelter Risk Reduction Farm based Livelihood Community Restoration Protection Health Education Governance Infrastructure Gender Equality Environmental Safeguards
STRATEGIES ISSUED Relief Winter Survival Return Early Recovery Shelter Agriculture AGRICULTURE FOOD SHELTER 6
7 Pakistan Floods Emergency Response Plan 2010 - PFERP
RESPONSE PLAN Timeline - Sep 2010 - Sep 2011 Plan (GOP/UN) - Finalized Projects - 397 Amount - 1.9 billion US $ 8
CLUSTER WISE PROJECTS Cluster Total Projects Appeal ($) Food Security 13 573.2 m Shelter 61 321.1 m WASH 51 245.1 m Health 85 198.9 m Agriculture 24 170.5 m Community Restoration 61 167.1 m Education 22 83.4 m Protection 43 52.9 m Nutrition 25 44.6 m Miscellaneous 12 80.2 m TOTAL 397 1.939 Billion 9
Pakistan Floods Emergency Response Plan As of 11 November 2010 Food Funding Unmet 40% 60% Overall Response Shelter 14% 86% Agriculture 43% 57% Health WASH 29% 71% 24% 76% 55% 45% Nutrition 51% 49% Protection 13% 87% ommunity Education 3% 97% 9% 91% Funded Remaining 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 10
11 Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)
12 NEED FOR DRR? Pakistan a disaster prone country frequency and nature 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 5 Yrs 7Yrs 11 Yrs 56 Yrs 1926-1982 1983-1994 1994-2001 2002-2006 Since then: 2 Cyclones 2 Floods 2 Earthquakes 2 Land Slides 1 Complex Emergency Erosion of Economic Growth and Social Capital Unsustainable Development Pakistan a developing country with emphasis on infrastructure development Difficult to achieve Poverty Reduction Goals
Provide for internal coping mechanisms 13 PURPOSE OF DRR All activities are designed with consideration for potential disaster risks Development and Reconstruction programs do not increase vulnerability to disasters in all sectors Early Recovery, Rehabilitation and Reconstruction initiatives are designed to contribute to developmental aims Protection of huge investment
An Opportunity!! Receptive Communities Responsive Government Willing Donor Support Scaling up Disaster Reduction for Sustainable Development Enabling Environmen t Effective Organization al Structure Eager Implementing Partners 14
Residential colony of hospital THQ MADIAN
Punjab
22 CHALLENGES DISASTER PREVENTION Resource constraints, attitudinal and institutional resistance Lack of consultative forums and public-private partnerships Lack of ex-ante dedicated funding arrangements and catastrophe risk financing instruments Inadequate institutional capacities at national, provincial and district levels Insufficient community mobilization, support structures and resources
NDMA s DRR RECOMMENDATIONS Central policy making and Robust M & E Baseline risk identification Multi-risk factors should be considered in design as well as implementation Need based up gradations where ever required Planning documents (PC-Is) satisfy standardized DRR requirements Continued. 23
NDMA s DRR RECOMMENDATIONS Wide-scale social mobilization and public sensitization Balance mix of vernacular and hazard resistant construction Institutional capacity building for local authorities to undertaking reconstruction Constant satellite imaging to guard against massive wood logging Continued. 24
Political Ownership Public/Pvt Partnership Ex-Ante Funding Institutional Capacity Community Mobilization Social & Literate Capital Peaceful Environment 25 Sustainable Development
Political Ownership Public/Pvt Partnership Ex-Ante Funding Institutional Capacity Community Mobilization Social & Literate Capital Peaceful Environment DISASTER Sustainable Development INABLE DEVELO SUSTA MENT Public/Pvt Partnership 26
THANK YOU