IDMP: International Data, Multiple Processes

Similar documents
Speed to IDMP Readiness A case study in data mining

IMPROVE YOUR SUPPLY CHAIN OVERSIGHT

Introduction to the Identification of Medicinal Products ( IDMP)

Process and Architecture Overview IDMP Identification of Medicinal Products. Sven Eller, Life Sciences Solution Engagement Manager

IDMP (IDENTIFICATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS) How A Pilot Program Can Help Answer the Questions of Data Sources and Costs to Compliance

IDMP update: A practical approach to IDMP implementation and the impact of the possible new phasing

Agency and Internal Labeling

SPOR for VETERINARY. EU Network Data Board / SPOR Task Force 29, 30 June 1 July Presented by: Jos Olaerts Veterinary Division

Pharmacovigilance in 2020: Boldly Shaping the Future An overview

Pharmacovigilance Post July 2012 The new frontier

What is an ideal PSUR? A new focus based on aligned expectations

Project Management Standards Applied to Complex Clinical Trials. Disclaimer

IDMP Medicinal Product: How complex could it get?

ISO IDMP TF: Reports from subgroups. EU ISO IDMP Task Force meeting 12 June 2015

Constructing an etmf 12/2/2011. consider your current etmf structure!! The do s and don ts of EDM. Disclaimer

Structured Content Management [SCM]

Transforming Regulatory Affairs through Technology - End to End Tech Platform Approach

SPOR data management services - high level changes

PSMF in Practice Your Questions Answered! GPvP Symposium, 14 March 2014 Jonathan Rowell, Senior GPvP Inspector

How to facilitate the cross-borders cross-domains identification of products (HL7 and IDMP) TSC Meeting, Sunday Q5, Baltimore (MD)

Delivering GxP compliant mobile applications a practical case study. Presented by: Mark Stevens

NAS and KAS Industry perspective

SPL Use Case: Improving Compliance, Increasing Efficiencies, and Reducing Costs

Pharmacovigilance in Asia: The China Perspectives. Disclaimer

Implementation of EU Falsified Medicines Directive

Effective application of Risk Management techniques to Drug Safety: a pragmatic approach

Andrew Williams Senior Director European Medical Operations GlaxoSmithKline Company logo here. Disclaimer

The Do's/Don'ts, An SDTM Validation Perspective. The should/shouldn't when explaining issues in the SDRG (Study Data Reviewer s Guide)

I need a medicine while

Procedures in Regard to Entire Product Information Dr. Klaus Menges BfArM Bethesda (MD) October 14, 2011

Labelling Harmonization 2011

Data quality control methodology for data submitted under Article 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No.726/2004

Agenda item 4.1 Draft proposal - Notifications of the location of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF)

How can Regulatory Agencies leverage the effectiveness of the Clinical Trials Enterprise

Labelling & Naming. European Biosimilars Group (EBG) perspective. >400 Million patient days worldwide clinical experience with EU biosimilar medicines

QPPV Association and Training Part 2 Session Introduction

CREATING EUDRAVIGILANCE PRODUCT REPORT MESSAGES: PRODUCT REPORT STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE

BEST PRACTICES FOR RANDOMIZATION AND TRIAL SUPPLY MANAGEMENT (RTSM)

Doc. No. DPS/GDL/034 Revision No.: 0 Effective Date: 26 April 2018 Review-Due Date: 26 April 2021

Technical Aspects of Implementation. Alastair Nixon, Chair, EFPIA ectd Focus Group, Director, Submission Standards, GSK

New EudraVigilance functionalities and the 2010 pharmacovigilance legislation preparing for change

Using etechnologies to Increase Efficiency and Quality in Regulatory Operations

Practical implications of the new ICH Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) standard. Alastair Fowkes

Brexit Guidance for Stakeholders Human and veterinary medicines

Connecting the parts Developing an integrated IDMP strategy

Public Assessment Report

HTAs and EMA working together: 23 parallel scientific advice procedures later - what have we learned?

BULGARIAN ASSOCIATION FOR DRUG INFORMATION (BADI)

Pharmacovigilance Inspection Metrics Report

The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are

EudraVigilance stakeholder change management plan: integration with the Identity and Access Management (IAM2) project deliverables

Update on New MedDRA SOC Product issues

Explanatory note on general fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

The Dirty Little Secret of Software Pricing

Sharing Regulatory Intelligence: Best Practices and Case Studies

Document Reuse: Theory and Practice

NIMPs (v IMPs): Definitions and Practical Approaches

QbD Approach and Regulatory Challenges in Japan

Do Niche CROs have a Role in Drug Development?

A practical guide to achieving and maintaining global oversight and ensuring end-to-end pharmacovigilance

Explanatory note on general fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

Guidance on preparing for Brexit in the centralised procedure

PMS Data Quality PMS Subgroup meeting March Jeff Martin (SE MPA) & Martha Schei Hynne (NoMA) & ad-hoc NCA PMS group

Electronic exchange of Pharmacovigilance data:

WINNING STRATEGIES FOR THE DISTRIBUTION INDUSTRY. Effective Inventory Analysis By Jon Schreibfeder. >> Compliments of Microsoft Business Solutions

Guide to EU Clinical Trial Application Form

General Manager IST GmbH - Mannheim. 26th Annual EuroMeeting March 2014 ACV, Vienna Austria

Into the Clouds. Understanding How Cloud Computing Will Effect the Future of Regulated Content Management. Jennifer Goldsmith

Regulatory update from Europe:

EMA - Early Access. PEARRL Annual Meeting 2017-Regulatory Science Symposium. University College Cork, Ireland

Microsoft Dynamics GP. Sales Order Processing

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

The Safety Case as a basis for more effective outsourcing of writing of aggregate safety reports

CDISC/TransCelerate Collaboration and TransCelerate work streams. -Clinical Data Standards -Common Protocol Template -esource

Pharmacovigilance: Information systems and Services

Quality Management in PV. Andrea Lohée, Pharm-AD DCVMN training on PV, May 2017

The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are

Innovative Solutions for the Life Sciences

Trends in pharmacovigilance inspection deviations. 8th Scandinavian SARQA/DKG Quality Assurance Conference

Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions. Bringing a new drug to life. Regulatory Sciences

Orphan designation in the EU

The webinar will begin shortly

QbD approach and Regulatory Challenges in Europe

Getting ready for the Identification of Medicinal Products

New Regulation in Japan and Future Direction of PMDA. Tatsuya Kondo, M.D., Ph.D. Chief Executive Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)

Hands-on in Latin America Regulations for Clinical Trials

Orphan designation in the EU

Incorporating Risk- Based Monitoring Strategies: Challenges in Implementation Sherri Hubby, Director, U.S. Quality Assurance

Medicines for Children

Regulatory Information Management

Feedback on EudraVigilance & new functionalities

FMD Workshop 27 June 2016

Data standardization and advancing regulatory science

Pharmacovigilance System Master file

Materials Management Traceability, CEPs and managing non-conforming sites

FDA Requirements 5/16/2011. FDA and new IND regs. Changes on the horizon: CIOMS IX ICH upcoming initiatives

GUIDELINE REGARDING COLLECTION, VERIFICATION, AND SUBMISSION OF THE REPORTS OF ADVERSE EVENTS / REACTIONS OCCURRING IN CLINICAL DRUG TRIALS

European Medicines Agency post-authorisation procedural advice for users of the centralised procedure

High Quality or Poor Quality DB

Transcription:

IDMP: International Data, Multiple Processes Joel Finkle Director, Regulatory Innovation and IDMP Strategy

Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to DIA, its directors, officers, employees, volunteers, members, chapters, councils, Communities or affiliates, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. These PowerPoint slides are the intellectual property of the individual presenter and are protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries. Used by permission. All rights reserved. DIA and the DIA logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of Drug Information Association Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Not to be taken internally.

Overview Orientation Obligation Obstacles Opportunity Ovation

Orientation Viewpoint of Industry (and vendors) Differences from Agency vantage point What IDMP Means to MAHs/Sponsors Beyond Europe

Orientation: Viewpoint of Industry (and vendors) IDMP is an added cost But It could have benefits We ll farm it out just like we did XEVMPD Then you won t get those benefits We re already there Maybe but until the EMA implementation guide is done, you won t know for sure We re already doing MDM we ve got six of em Just no.

Orientation: Differences from Agency Vantage Point Both sides want to standardize how data is used: Master Data Management Agencies standardize across companies and other agencies: Horizontal Integration Companies standardize across processes: Vertical Integration Research Knowledge Registration Registration Registration Registration Registratio Knowledge Knowledge Knowledge Knowledge Knowledg Marketing and Supply Chain Knowledge

Orientation: What IDMP Means to MAHs/Sponsors Continuation of Article 57 Expansion of XEVMPD requirements Submission of the same record type for other things too Supply chain protection, minor variations, clinical trial registration, etc. Expectation that someday, it ll be used by other agencies too Recent survey by IRISS shows about 50% of companies are not positive about investment

Orientation: Beyond Europe IDMP is merely more SPL UDI is really a lighter IDMP for Medical Devices FDA now Netherlands starting July 2018 Rest of Europe 2021-2027 depending on device type Drug Listings FDA Establishment Registration FDA REMS FDA Content of Labeling FDA Unfortunately not convergence: SPL is pretty generic in its capabilities, which depends heavily on vocabularies

Obligation Conversion from XEVMPD New and Changed Registrations Clinical Trials Supply Chain Security

Obligation: Conversion from XEVMPD Big initial effort to comply At first glance, maybe only twice the data But Single records for a product need to be broken up by package It s unclear yet whether all layers of packaging are needed (goal is to minimize, but then it s hard to represent kits)

Conversion (continued) EMA wants to help by pre-converting, but How to align with multiple product records on sponsor side? How to resolve differences of opinion on coding? Agency View 30 count blisters IDMP ID 11122202 Sponsor View 3 blisters of 10 RIM ID PBJ11141 XEVMPD ID 1112222 30 count blisters IDMP ID 11122202 XEVMPD ID 1112222 6 blisters of 5 RIM ID PBJ11142 100 count Bottle IDMP ID 11122203 Bottle of 100 RIM ID PBJ11143

Obligation: New and Changed Registrations Shouldn t be significantly more effort than current variations for Article 57 compliance Leverage business knowledge when managing product registrations Option Initial Cost Ongoing Cost Business Knowledge Value Use EMA Web tool $ $$$ $ Integrate with RIM $$$ $ $$$ Outsourced Service $$ $$ $$

Obligation: Clinical Trials XEVMPD currently is required for Investigational Products prior to registering a clinical trial Iteration 1 of IDMP doesn t cover Investigational Products Initially, still need XEVMPD! Eventually, some subset of the IDMP record will be needed prior to trial registration

Obligation: Supply Chain Security FMD = Falsified Medicines Directive Trace Counterfeit and Contaminated products Packages tracked at wholesale and retail level Minimal effort: Just register your IDMP IDs At least that s the theory EMA says that FMD should be able to use the Product database

Obstacles International Enthusiasm Gap European Loss of Momentum Moving Targets Volume of Data to be Tabulated

Obstacles: International Enthusiasm Gap So far, only EMA has made any progress toward implementation US says, We re already compatible Detail and magnitude very different Other proposals, such as CMC/PQ, do not leverage much of IDMP (yet) The US NDC is essentially a Medicinal Product ID (MPID) No other commitments yet

Obstacles: European Loss of Momentum Previous goals will not be met Implementation guide will not be available in 2018 Submissions will not be requested in 2019 Reasons Detailed, multi-phase project Relocation of EMA due to Brexit No expectation of cancellation

Obstacles: Moving Targets ISO IDMP standards continuing to evolve Mostly refinements for Substances Catching up to EMA requirements To be published very shortly EMA requirements not complete yet Good news: EMA is taking cost/benefit to industry as part of the process for setting requirements

Obstacles: Volume of Data to be Tabulated Global Substance Registration System ISO Full IDMP FDA CMC FDA DLER EMA IDMP Iteration 1 EMA XEVPRM

Obstacles: Volume of Data (continued) Most data locked up in documents Innovations in Natural Language Processes Innovations in Structured Documents Upgrade from XEVPRM not straightforward Turning one record into many (mainly packages) Re-coding of data where there are more values

Opportunity Justification to get RIM in order Master Data Management Structured Documents Reduced effort for variations/supplements

Opportunity: Justification to get RIM in order Label Management Correspondence Submission Tracking RIM Registration Tracking Commitments

RIM (continued) More than just IDMP Answer Management Questions Where am I marketed? When do I need to renew? What manufacturers are involved? What are the sources of ingredients? Are some packages only approved in some markets?

RIM Mapping product info toward IDMP 1) Medicinal Product Section/Field XEVMPD Yes/No/Partial Mapping MPID N Registration Number Combined Pharmaceutical Dose Form P Dose Form describing all pieces as sold (I)MPID Cross-Reference N Previous IDMP Registrations Reference Product Type N Previous IDMP Registrations Additional Monitoring Indicator Y Labeling Paediatric Use Indicator Y Labeling Orphan Designation Status Y Approval Letter

2) Name Section/Field XEVMPD Yes/No/Partial Full Name Y Name as authorised Mapping Invented Name Part P Extract from full name Scientific Name Part Y In XEVMPD, or extract Strength Name Part Y In XEVMPD, or extract Pharmaceutical Dose Form Part Y In XEVMPD, or extract Formulation Part P Extract from full name Intended Use Part P Extract from full name Target Population Part P Extract from full name Container or Pack Part P Extract from full name Device Part P Extract from full name Trademark or Company Name Part Y In XEVMPD, or extract Time/Period Part P Extract from full name Flavour Part P Extract from full name Delimiter Part N N/A (Medicinal Product Name) Country N Each name per country/language (Medicinal Product Name) Language N Each name per country/language

3) Classifications Section/Field Industry Position after Workshop (Product Classification) Value for ATC Code Accepted In XEVMPD Mapping (Product Classification) Value for Legal Basis of Approval Accepted From Approval Letter (Product Classification) Value for Medicinal Product Type Accepted In XEVMPD (Product Classification) Value for Falsified Medicines Flag Accepted New (Product Classification) Value for Authorised Dosage Form For discussion From Approval Letter (Product Classification) Value for EURD Identifier Acceptable From Application Form (Product Classification) Value for Biological/Vaccines flag Acceptable From Application Form

4) Header/Documents Section/Field XEVMPD Yes/No/Partial (Header) Identifier N From Approval Letter (Header) Effective Date N From Approval Letter Mapping (Header) Language N From EDMS for Document (Header) Version Number N From EDMS for Document (Header) Version Set Identifier N From EDMS for Document (Attached Document) Identifier N From EDMS for Document (Attached Document) Effective Date N From EDMS for Document (Attached Document) Type N From EDMS for Document (Attached Document) Content Y From EDMS for Document (Attached Document) Language Y From EDMS for Document (Attached Document) Media Type Y From EDMS for Document (Attached Document) Version Number Y From EDMS for Document (Attached Document) Version Set Identifier N From EDMS for Document (Master File) File Type Y From EDMS for Document (Master File) File Code Y From EDMS for Document

5) Authorisation Section/Field XEVMPD Yes/No/Partial Marketing Authorisation Number Y From Approval Letter (Marketing Authorisation) Country Y From Approval Letter Legal Status of Supply N From Approval Letter Authorisation Status Y From Approval Letter Authorisation Status Date P From Approval Letter Date of First Authorisation N Approval Letter / RIM International Birth Date N Approval Letter / RIM (Jurisdictional Marketing Authorisation) Country N From Approval Letter (Jurisdictional Marketing Authorisation) Marketing Authorisation Number N From Approval Letter Procedure Identifier/Number Y From Application Form Procedure Type Y From Application Form (Marketing Status) Country N From Application Form Marketing Status N Approval Letter / RIM Marketing Start Date N RIM Marketing Stop Date N RIM Risk of shortage supply N RIM / Supply Chain Risk of shortage supply comment N RIM / Supply Chain Later: PSURs, Marketing Events/Suspensions Mapping

6) Organisations / Manufacturers Section/Field Organisation (e.g. MAH, QPPV, PSMFL) XEVMPD Yes/No/Partial ARIM Identifier Y From OMS or DUNS Role N From OMS or RIM Location Address Y From OMS or RIM Location Role Y From OMS or RIM Entity Identifier (according to Role e.g. PSMF ID) Y From OMS or RIM Manufacturer/Establishment Operation Type N From OMS or RIM Manufacturing Authorisation Reference Number N From OMS or RIM Effective Date N From RIM Confidentiality Indicator N From RIM Later: SME Status

7) Packaging Section/Field XEVMPD Yes/No/Partial Mapping PCID N From IDMP SPOR System Package Description P From XEVMPD, but must be divided Package Item (Container) Type N From RIM or Documents Package Item (Container) Quantity N From RIM or Documents Material N From RIM or Documents Component Type N From RIM or Documents Component Material N From RIM or Documents Manufactured Dose Form N Form of the component. Easy things easy, hard things hard Unit of Presentation N From RIM or Documents Manufactured Item Quantity N From RIM or Documents Device Type N From RIM or Documents Device Trade Name N From RIM or Documents (Data Carrier Identifier) Code System N From RIM or Documents (Data Carrier Identifier) Value N From RIM or Documents Later: Characteristics of package, device, manufactured item; shelf life/storage

8) Pharmaceutical Product & Ingredients Pharmaceutical Product Administrable Dose Form Section/Field XEVMPD Yes/No/Partial Y Mapping Combined form, ignoring parts Solution for Injection Unit of Presentation N From RIM or Documents Route of Administration Y From XEVMPD PhPID Identifier Sets N Requires formula to be published Device Type Y Rare item Device Trade Name N Rare item Ingredient Ingredient Role P From RIM or Documents Substance P From RIM or Documents Strength Range (for Substances) P From RIM or Documents Specified Substance N From RIM or Documents Strength Range (for Specified Substances) N From RIM or Documents Confidentiality Indicator N From RIM or Documents Reference Substance P From RIM or Documents Reference Specified Substance N From RIM or Documents Reference Strength Range P From RIM or Documents Later: Pharmaceutical Product Characteristics, Device details (rare)

9) Clinical Particulars (Just Indications for now) Section/Field XEVMPD Yes/No/Partial Mapping Indication Text N MedDRA Mapping, one may become many Indication as "Disease/ Symptom/ Procedure" Y From XEVMPD Co-Morbidity N From Label Intended Effect N From Label Age Range Low N From Label Age Range High N From Label Later: Indications: gender, race and health status; other therapies Contraindications: same complexity as Indications Interactions Undesirable Effects

Opportunity: Master Data Management CTMS Content Management Safety Reporting QMS RIM Marketing Catalog External Vocabularies Supply Chain Partners

MDM (Continued) A product-centered database is useful for the entire enterprise Regulatory Marketing Supply Chain Safety Over the long term, efficiencies outweigh costs

Opportunity: Data-Structured Documents Data and Metadata currently embedded in documents Expose that data to other systems Non-Trivial Effort But not doing it is a slow, ongoing cost Examples IRISS DOCX Project to embed XML DITA Don t wait for standards, forge them! When you've been in marketing as long as I have, you'll know that before any new product can be developed it has to be properly researched. We ve got to find out what people want from fire, how they relate to it, what sort of image it has for them. Stick it up your nose Which is precisely the sort of thing we need to know. Do people want fire that can be fitted nasally? From The Hitchhiker s Guide to the Galaxy

Structured Documents (continued) Alternative is Natural Language Processing Most tools are very expensive Documents will only be analyzed once At least hopefully Revisions should be directly added to the RIM environment Still requires human review Instead, tag as you go Tools are young Requires some training for authors/reviewers But at least they re part of the existing word processing environment

Opportunity: Reduced effort for variations/supplements? EMA proposal Minor variations could be coded as just IDMP Submit without documents, just facts Initially small number of variation types Each additional variation type may require more data to be coded FDA CMC/Product Quality data is similar in concept, but different in data required

Ovation Improved processes at home Ease of exchange with partners and acquisition EMA requirements form the core of what will be needed elsewhere The prize for a job well done is

Ovation: Improved processes at home RIM Database: Know Thyself Smarter Authoring: Write it once Master Data Management: Know it once Technology investments have a cost, but should pay off in the long run, in ways outside the original purpose

Ovation: Ease of exchange with partners and acquisition Product acquisitions, out-licensing and co-marketing Already know your product information better Exchange registration and formulation data using standard formats

Ovation: EMA requirements form the core of what will be needed elsewhere US still promises that IDMP is in their future Other countries express interest Regardless of whether IDMP is implemented RIM database for registrations helps manage submission information Even with changes from market to market, commonalities make it worth centralizing knowledge Aim high in steering lesson from high school driving class

Ovation: The prize for a job well done is another job IDMP Iteration 1 is not the end Full IDMP is about 3X the data needed initially Use Master Data Management concepts to Integrate partner data Align marketing catalog with registrations Consolidate affiliate data

Ask Ask Questions

Image Credits All images Creative Commons Orientation: Luis Pérez Obligation: Erich Ferdinand Opportunity: Lachlan Donald Obstacles: Stevan Sheets Ovation: きうこ Kiuko