Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey

Similar documents
2010 Employee Survey Results. May 2010

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS

2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

COLLEGE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Laramie County Community College - Spring 2016 Respondents. Mean

EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY VOICE OF EMPLOYEE - ANALYSIS & RESULTS. SpiceJet Employee Satisfaction Survey

Feedback report. Employee effectiveness

2017 Engagement Survey. Results Overview

Monument Credit Union Employee Opinion Survey. Employee Report. Presented by:

EMPLOYEE OPINION SURVEY NARRATIVE REPORT XYZ COMPANY. (Sample report with representative sections, graphics, and text)

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. Human Resources Overall

UnitingCare ReGen Staff Survey Results Commercial in Confidence Page 1 of 13

Report Employee Satisfaction Survey

August 4, 2010 Information Requests Round 1

Work Expectations Profile

Employee Satisfaction Survey. Office of Institutional Research & Assessment

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Overview of Reports Survey Results

UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey. Prepared for: University of Alaska, Fairbanks Administrative Services

Summary Category Scores vs. Benchmark UC OVERALL [W] (N=8,096) vs. TOWERS WATSON U.S. NATIONAL NORM (N=160,605)

NZ Police 2007 Employee Engagement Survey (Organisational Health Audit) Results Presentation

DTR72KXREB7/TGDTRN24PERe. Sample Organization Sample Organization

Summary Report. Methodology

DTR9274O1HJ/TGDTRm5Xgw33Z. Department Survey Sample Department

Finance and Administration. Data Report

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Dartmouth College 2008 Staff Survey

Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF. Faculty Results January 2014

Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF. Staff Results. January 2014

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

SANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey. Results and Findings

Jeffco Public Schools

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Employee Opinion Survey

Organizational climate dimensions of employees in engineering colleges

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. College of Ag, Food and Environment Overall

Office of Shared Accountability. February David J. Bernstein, Ph.D. Evaluation Specialist. Cynthia Loeb Logistics Specialist. Julie Wade Analyst

Employee Engagement Hierarchy

ModernThink Employee Engagement Survey Summary Report

Employee Survey Results Summary Report

2013 IUPUI Staff Survey Summary Report

The ClimateQUAL : OCDA survey measures the following organizational climates:

UMD Graduate Assistants Overall

Toolkit. The Core Characteristics of a Great Place to Work Supporting Framework and Tools. Author: Duncan Brodie

SPRING 2012 EMPLOYEE OUTLOOK PART OF THE CIPD OUTLOOK SERIES

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

2015 Staff Engagement Survey Results

2018 Yolo County Employee Engagement Survey

Results of the Employee Engagement Survey, October 2015

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

28% 17% Satisfaction Mean Scores by Question Dimension

2009 Smithsonian Employee Perspective Survey Office of Policy and Analysis Smithsonian Institution December 2009

20% 19% 9% 11% 8% 4% 4% 5% Satisfaction with UC San Diego. Satisfaction Mean Scores by Question Dimension

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION DECEMBER BCFP Annual Employee Survey Results

The Role of the Manager in Impacting Employee Engagement. Presented by: Kerry Liberman, President People Perspectives LLC

2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey. San Diego

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Employee Well-Being and Satisfaction Survey Results 2015

EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION STUDY. September 2009

Great Colleges to Work For. Institutional Research and Information Tim Stanley, Associate Director Taylor Lovell, Research Analyst

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

2011 Smithsonian Employee Perspective Survey Dashboard of Key Metrics

Compensation & Motivation. October 6, 2014

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

HIGHLIGHT OF THE UC SAN DIEGO 2015 STAFF ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Benchmark Data Package Report Overview

Institutional Climate Update

Resilient Organizations

GRADUATE SCHOOL 2018 ADVANCING THE UNIVERSITY S MISSION: ENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT

DTRQ9FO8D9N/TGDTRbzN2v4v. Sample Leader Leader Sample

Calgary Police Commission. Annual Employee Engagement Survey Report

Gallup Q12 Assessment August 7, I. Introduction

Employee Engagement Leadership Workshop

2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey. Riverside

Best Places to Work for YOU Survey Results

Employee Satisfaction Summary. Prepared for: ABC Inc. By Insightlink Communications October 2005

University wide Report Delivering quality survey, research and analysis solutions

This report was obtained (via FOIA) and posted by AltGov2.

SampleCo Organization Survey Results

ModernThink 2016 Great Colleges Survey The University of Virginia's College at Wise Response Distribution Report

Survey Methods. Hutto ISD Employee Survey All employees invited. HR Services. Online

DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Chapter Author: Douglas L. Kruse, Richard B. Freeman, Joseph R. Blasi

BUILDING A CULTURE OF ENGAGEMENT: THE IMPORTANCE OF SENIOR LEADERSHIP

Estrella Mountain Core Values Survey. Fall Executive Summary and Report Card

1925 San Jacinto Blvd., D3500 Phone (512) Austin, Texas Fax (512)

2017 Merritt College Employee Satisfaction Survey

Are Your Employees Engaged? Is Your Ethics Culture Supporting Staff Engagement?

Design Recruitment and support of a diverse student population.

Performance Motivational Influencing Employees Relationship of Swissotel Le Concorde Bangkok

TRENDICATORS SURVEY REPORT EMPLOYEES SOUND OFF ON GOAL SETTING & PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK

Strengths. Opportunities. Engaged Not Engaged Actively Disengaged Engagement Index Ratio: % 61% 10%

2016 Survey of Employee Engagement Work Group Results

50 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT. IDEAS and TIPS A LEADER S GUIDE TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

#IGPostgraduateEducation17. Dr Claire Slight Project Officer Surveys Higher Education Academy (HEA)

Survey Results: Appendix: See our Web Page: The University of Texas at Austin 2014

Institutional Strengths. Improvement Opportunities & Implementation Suggestions. Institutional Summary

Expectations for work Views of final year undergraduates and recent graduates. November 2017

Transcription:

Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey Summary Report Fourth Annual Opinion Survey Conducted via telephone and online Spring 2003

Survey Background 57 Questions in the survey. Includes comment opportunity. 5 - Modules. Recognition, Senior Leadership, Empowerment, Performance, Communication (5 questions each). Scoring on on five point scale: Strongly Disagree = 1 to Strongly Agree. = 5. Top two options (4 and 5) make up the favorability rating. June 2003 2

Favorability Rating Index Ratings Over 50% 60% 70% Description Mildly Positive Positive Strongly Positive June 2003 3

Survey Background Response Rate 33% 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 101 112 103 143 39% 29% 32 % 33% 2000 2001 2002 2003 100 % 50% 0 June 2003 4

Survey Background PT Faculty 26% Unknown 1% Adm 32% Std Wkr/Temp 10% Class 18% FT Faculty 13% June 2003 5

Results by Category Overall satisfaction improved from 78% to 85%. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Overall Satisfaction Job Attitudes Commitment Coworkers Supervision Communication Performance Feeback Recognition Empowerment Pay/Benefits Career Opportunities Survey Attitudes Senior Leadership Favorable Not Favorable Neutral June 2003 6

Caveats Room for error Instrument limitations Misunderstood questions Response errors Some questions have a large number of neutral responses Often, most of the comments are negative ones. June 2003 7

Highest Rated Results 1. I am proud of my work (96%). 2. I am personally committed to help the company achieve its goals (95%). 3. My job gives me an opportunity to use my skills (90%). 4. I get a sense of accomplishment from my work (89%). 5. I can see the results of my work (88%). June 2003 8

Lowest Rated Questions 1. Upper management understands employee s concerns (29% agreed). 2. Employees at this company truly respect upper management (31% agreed). 3. There are obstacles that keep me from doing my work (reversed - 34% disagreed) 4. I have confidence in the District Governing Board and the decisions that they make (39% agreed). 5. I believe that management will use the results of this survey effectively (40% agreed). June 2003 9

Communication 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Supervisor Department Accuracy Need to Know Timely Favorable Not Favorable Neutral Well above past rates. Biggest jumps were in accuracy and timeliness. June 2003 10

Career Opportunities 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Below past levels of satisfaction. My supervisor encourages my career I am aware when positions become available There is opportunity to advance Favorable Not Favorable Neutral June 2003 11

Commitment 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Improvement over past responses. I am personally I am proud to be an I would recommend I expect to be at commited to CCC employee CCC CCC in 5 years Favorable Not Favorable Neutral June 2003 12

Coworkers 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Improvements in CCC teamwork, but drop in coworker relationships and cooperation.. Good working My coworkers People care about CCC employees work relationship with cooperate each other at CCC as a team coworkers Favorable Not Favorable Neutral June 2003 13

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% *Reversed Empowerment Access to information Supervisor helps me to feel I can accomplish tough assignments I can make changes without going through several levels of approval My director or department chair shares control Favorable Not Favorable Neutral There are not obstacles that prevent me from doing my work* Big jumps. Some connection with communication and supervisor support which also jumped. June 2003 14

Job Attitudes Employees indicated increased freedom to make decisions that affect their job. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% I am proud of There are I have a sense of I can see the I like my job Freedom to make my work opportunities to accomplishment results of my decisions that use my skills work affect my job Favorable Not Favorable Neutral June 2003 15

Pay and Benefits 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% CCC is increasingly meeting employee s needs and improving the competitiveness of its pay and benefits package. I understand CCC's benefits I understand CCC's compensation procedures CCC offers a competitive package Benefits meet my needs I am fairly paid Favorable Not Favorable Neutral June 2003 16

Performance Feedback NEW! 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Another link with improvements in communication. I understand I understand My supervisor's My performance I receive what to do to how performance feedback helps rating accurately frequent improve my is evaluated me improve reflects my feedback on my performance performance performance Favorable Not Favorable Neutral June 2003 17

Recognition NEW! 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Someone else I am I am recognized CCC recognizes I am gets the glory appreciated for for good work employees who appreciated for for my work* my work do good work extra effort Favorable Not Favorable Neutral *Reversed June 2003 18

Supervision Improvements in supervisor support and motivation. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Supervisor Keeps me Praises me Provides Keeps me Motivates me support informed feedback focused Favorable Not Favorable Neutral June 2003 19

Senior Leadership 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% My Dean or VP cares for the well being of employees My Dean or VP treats employees fairly I have confidence in the DGB and their decisions Employees respect senior leadership Upper management understands employees' concerns Neutral Not Favorable Favorable Low, but improving, particularly regarding senior leadership s caring for employee s well being. June 2003 20

Overall Satisfaction 2003 Overall, I like working for Coconino Community College. Favorable Not Favorable Neutral Overall satisfaction rate is 85% compared to a historical rate of 78%. June 2003 21

Concerns by Employee Type Senior Leadership Career Opportunities Pay and Benefits Associate Faculty June 2003 22

Concerns by Employee Type Communication Senior Leadership Empowerment Full-time Faculty June 2003 23

Concerns by Employee Type Senior Leadership Classified Most improved employee type. Saw increases in supervision, communication and overall satisfaction. Decreases in coworker relationships, career opportunities and commitment to CCC. June 2003 24

Concerns by Employee Type Pay and Benefits Senior Leadership Std Worker/Temp June 2003 25

Concerns by Employee Type Adm/Professional No categories listed as unfavorable. Lowest rated category was senior leadership. June 2003 26

Demographic Differences? Gender Very few differences Gender concerns (both genders) Senior Leadership Career Opportunities fell Ethnicity Some differences Minority concerns Recognition Career Opportunities Senior Leadership Coworker Relationships June 2003 27

Demographic Differences? Location Lone Tree or Other Location Recognition, Pay and Benefits higher for Other Locations Job Attitudes higher for Lone Tree Concerns Very similar to the concerns overall June 2003 28

Sample Comments CCC is a wonderful place to work Morale and enthusiasm for the job at CCC is at an all-time low People here tend to want to improve conditions and generally are fair in their approach to this. Fellow employees and Senior Leadership at the college make it very difficult to perform. Employee relation issues are not taken as seriously as before. Increase the standards for management. I believe that upper management has made some extremely difficult decisions that have greatly impacted College productivity in a very good way. I suggest management skill training for supervisors college wide. June 2003 29

Action Plans Several areas still need work, but we have made a lot of progress in four short years. 1. Career Opportunities 2. Recognition 3. Senior Leadership 4. Empowerment 5. Pay/Benefits (particularly with associate faculty and student workers/temp) 6. Communication (particularly with Full-time faculty) June 2003 30

Questions