The Crescent Corridor Improving Lives and Livelihoods

Similar documents
NS and Public Private Partnerships: The Heartland Corridor & The Crescent Corridor. Robert E. Martinez Norfolk Southern Corporation October 2007

Modeling Applications for Freight Tennessee DOT Freight Planning

Darrell Wilson AVP Government Relations The Future of Freight Panel August 26 th, 2014

Donald W. Seale. & Chief Marketing Officer

Intermodal Success Story: BMW, SCPA and Norfolk Southern

Darrell Wilson Norfolk Southern Government Relations Public Private Partnerships

Robert E. Martínez Norfolk Southern Corporation

Intermodal Committee Discussion. January 16, 2008 Charlotte, North Carolina

Northwestern University Transportation Center

NEIL DOYLE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, INFRASTRUCTURE & TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT PRESENTS LOGISTICS, DISTRIBUTION & WAREHOUSING

American Association of Port Authorities Spring Meeting March 24, 2009

final report Georgia Department of Transportation and the Georgia Center of Innovation for Logistics Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Norfolk Southern: Creating Options for Ohio Shippers

Norfolk Southern: Creating Options for Ohio Shippers. Ohio Conference on Freight 15 September 2010

Leveraging Intermodal Transportation. Georgia Environmental Conference August 21, 2014

Rail Solutions and America s Future Prosperity Michael O Malley, July 12, 2008

The National Gateway Preparing for Tomorrow

The Point Intermodal River Port Facility at the Port of Huntington Project Benefit Cost Summary

Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee January 8, NCDOT Rail Division. Paul Worley, NCDOT Rail Division Director

Shifting Trade Routes Kyle Hancock January 25, 2013

Appendix B. Commodity Flow Profile

I-95 Corridor Coalition

Project Purpose and Need Statements

The National Gateway Preparing for Tomorrow Lisa Mancini, VP Strategic Infrastructure Initiatives

Intermodalism -- Metropolitan Chicago's Built-In Economic Advantage

Central Minnesota. Regional Freight Profile

Rail Intermodal Keeps America Moving

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Western Mountain Corridor (L)

Union County Freight Profile

Benefit Cost Analysis 2016 TIGER Grant Application Funding Opportunity #: DTOS59-16-RA-TIGER8

Project Overview. A Collaborative Effort

Rail Intermodal Keeps America Moving

INLAND DISTRIBUTION LOGISTICS PRESENTATION TO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PORT AUTHORITIES

Freight Trends and Freight Rail

FREIGHT RAIL BACKGROUND CONDITIONS AND CAPACITY

U.S. 220 Multimodal Corridor

Statewide Multimodal Networks

Gateway Cities Council of Governments Intelligent Transportation Systems Implementation Plan for Goods Movement

NASHVILLE REGIONAL FREIGHT & GOODS MOVEMENT STUDY PHASE II TECHNICAL MEMO #3: EXISTING TRENDS AND CONDITIONS

Virginia Statewide Multimodal Freight Study, Phase I

April 18, South Carolina s Inland Port. ULI Spartanburg

Transportation Consortium at the Center for Transportation February 14, 2014

Warren County Freight Profile

Introduction... 1 Florida s Rail System... 1 Rail Freight... 3 Rail Passengers... 5 Conclusions... 9

Presented to: MAASTO 2013 Conference. Presented by: Sandra K. Beaupre, Director Planning & Economic Development. July 2013

Freight Plans Planning, Preparing Staying Ahead. MAASTO July, 2013

Task 4.0 Technical Memorandum Project Priorities A Corridor Plan

Analysis of Options for Reducing Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic

The Future of Trucking in Virginia: Interstate and Intermodal Strategies

Massachusetts Rail Plan. September 16, 2010

Essex County Freight Profile

KICK-OFF MEETING April 2, 2014 Topeka, Kansas

summary report West Texas Rail Feasibility Study Texas Department of Transportation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. HNTB August 2011

Examining the Economic Trade-offs of Alternative Transportation Funding NC I-95 Economic Assessment

REPORT. Freight Physical Infrastructure Profile May 11, Submitted to: Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission (RRRC)

How Tomorrow Moves: Ohio Conference on Freight 2011 Atlantic Connections to the Midwest

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #1. The Vision, Goals and Objectives for Rail Transportation in Missouri

Cost / Benefit Analysis Table 1: Input variables used in Cost / Benefit Analysis Parameters Units Values General External Costs -Vehicles

Corridors of Statewide Significance: Introduction

Ron O Blenis, PE Senior Rail Project Manager (617)

Chapter 1 Introduction

Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Statewide Freight Study/ Plan

OHIO STATEWIDE FREIGHT STUDY PROGRESS UPDATE. Ohio Conference on Freight: September 12, 2012

North American Freight Trends and Issues

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Freight Railroads: Linking Pennsylvania to the World. Rudy Husband Lehigh Valley Planning Commission April 4, 2018 Allentown, Pennsylvania

Preparing for Post-Panamax Commodity Flows: Restructuring on Kentucky Waterways

Hunterdon County Freight Profile

Presented to : I 710 Project Committee June 30, 2011

BNSF Railway. Moving you Forward

Freight Transportation and Location Decisions National Association of Development Organizations

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Eastern Shore Corridor

CSX Montreal Expansion Ohio Conference on Freight September 2013

Environmental Benefits of Transportation Planning & Future Freight Policy. AAPA Energy and Environment Seminar Chicago September 17, 2014

Intermodal Port Strategy AAPA Vancouver Conference November 6, 2013

Jeff Florin, P.E. Vice President of Port Development. Regional / MPO Perspective of MARAD StrongPorts Program

JP Morgan Aviation, Transportation & Defense Conference. Wick Moorman Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer March 6, 2013

A NATIONAL NETWORK OF LOCAL SHIPPING EXPERTS

CHAPTER 6 FREIGHT MOVEMENT

3.0 FREIGHT FLOW OVERVIEW

Rickenbacker Inland Port Multimodal Infrastructure Improvements. Ohio Conference On Freight September 12, 2013

Chapter 3 Missouri Freight System

Planning for Container Growth Along the Houston Ship Channel and other Texas Seaports. TxDOT Project

American Association of Port Authorities Marine Terminal Management Program

How HRTPO Helps Freight Move. Presented by Robert B. Case, PE, PhD Transportation Technical Advisory Committee Agenda Item #13 April 1, 2015

CONTAINERS AND BEYOND Derrick Smith AAPA Spring Conference - March 18, 2013

The preparation of this report was financed in part through a technical studies grant from the Federal Transit Administration and metropolitan

Freight Public Private Partnerships Today. by Bill Habig, P.E., AICP Transportation Matters

Future of Transportation in Florida

Freight Facility Location Selection Freight Transportation and Facility Location Decisions

Wilmington-Harrisburg Freight Study. Presentation to the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission April 16, 2003

Once known as warehousing and distribution, the process

A Concept for Measuring the Effects of Severe Weather and Weather Trends on Freight Movement In and Between Major Urban Areas

Anticipating Global Change

NEARS UP Intermodal. Allison Watson, General Director April 30, 2014

Transform Milwaukee. Section 8 Freight Transportation and Logistics. Summary Findings

Delmarva Freight Plan

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

Somerset County Freight Profile

Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model

Transcription:

The Crescent Corridor Improving Lives and Livelihoods Philadelphia, Pennsylvania October 2009 1

Vision and Leadership Rail freight is an important component of any transportation infrastructure discussion. The Crescent Corridor will create good jobs, generate revenue, and help reduce highway congestion. In fact, it has the best potential to divert freight off of I81 and our highways. Pennsylvania has invested heavily in rail freight because it is a smart, environmentally friendly, costeffective infrastructure investment. I will continue to advocate for rail freight investments at the state and national level. Governor Ed Rendell 2

Crescent: A Crouching TIGER On September 15, 2009, a joint TIGER application (Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery) was filed on behalf of the Crescent Corridor by the Governors of Pennsylvania, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Virginia. Funding Partners: *The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has committed $45 million over three years. *The Commonwealth of Virginia has invested $43 million since 2007 and has pledged an additional $60 million. *Norfolk Southern has outlined a $264 million commitment by 2013. $25 in public benefits for every $1 of public funds invested from 2011-2040* $16 in public benefits for every $1 of public funds invested from 2011-2030* *Monetized public benefits at a 3% discount rate, derived from Cambridge Systematics analysis 3

Why Crescent, Why Now? Macro-Perspective 4

Crescent Corridor Parallel Rail-Highway Infrastructure Interstate Hwy. NS Rail Line CRESCENT CORRIDOR AT A GLANCE The most comprehensive public-private partnership for improving freight rail transportation in the East 300 miles of new passing track and double track New or expanded terminals in 11 markets $2.5 billion in new investments through full corridor development (3 phases) More options for shippers Existing 2,500 mile intermodal rail network from New Jersey to Louisiana parallel to interstate highways (I-20, 40, 59, 75, 76, 77, 78, 81, 85, and 95) The nation s most direct intermodal rail route between the Northeast 5 and South

Crescent Corridor at a Glance Crescent will attract more than 1.3 million long-haul trucks per year from interstates by full development, ANNUALLY delivering*: $1 billion in Logistics Savings $575 million in Congestion Savings $146 million in Safety Savings 170 million gallons in Fuel Savings 1.9 million tons of CO2 Eliminated $90 million in Highway Maintenance Savings $2 billion in Total Monetized Public Benefits *Monetized public benefits derived from Cambridge Systematics analysis 6

Crescent Corridor at a Glance The Crescent Corridor will serve as an engine of economic growth*: 3,600 direct construction-related full time equivalent jobs 23,000 construction-related full time equivalent jobs from at risk and potentially benefited industrial expansions 56% of Crescent TIGER funding will occur within economically distressed areas 73,000 jobs created or benefited by 2030 $40 billion in Cumulative Economic Impact from 2009 2030 *Economic impact derived from Insight Research Corporation analysis 7

By 2012, Traffic Congestion on Many Segments of Eastern U.S. Highways Will Consist of Over 20% Trucks Interstate highways of LOS (D, E, F) with 20% or more trucks (2012) Interstate highways of LOS (C) with 20% or more trucks (2012) Interstate highways of LOS (A or B) and/or less than 20% trucks (2012) Mississippi River Potential Crescent Corridor State 8 Source: Freight Analysis Framework 2

Highway Traffic is Rapidly Outpacing Capacity 105% increase in Truck VMT 210 Vehicle-Miles Traveled (VMT) and Lane-Miles: 1998-2005 200 190 180 Total VMT Lane Mile Truck VMT 170 Index 160 150 140 130 120 4% increase in highway lanemiles 110 100 90 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics (Washington, DC: Various years). * Updated with data current as of October 2006 9

Truckload Productivity is Diminishing: Index of Miles per Truck per Month: 2000 = 100 110 105 100 Trucking productivity is slipping due to: Congestion Driver Home Time Falling Average Length of Haul Hours of Service Rule Changes Fuel costs EPA engine requirements 95 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source: American Trucking Association 10

Crescent Corridor s Market Assessment of Freight Volumes Truck Diversion Methodology: The traffic forecast of highway to rail diversions considered 2 key data sources: 1.) Global Insight Transearch Database 2.) Proprietary data from 4 major U.S. trucking companies Transearch dry van data identified over 4 million applicable shipments, while the proprietary trucking data was used to define 88 market lanes. Together, these two data sources represented diversion opportunities in all markets served by the Crescent Corridor. *The darker the color on the above map, the higher the concentration of origin/destination pairs. 11

Truck Diversion Methodology was Built Around 4 Determining Factors Conveyance Type: Only Dry Van Truck Load Freight Length of Haul: Only shipments above 500 truck miles considered Length of haul is one determinant in diversion probability Speed: Higher speed operations produce higher diversion Service Quality: Better service produces higher diversion 12

The Crescent Corridor has High Truck Diversion Potential 13

Growth Plan Three Phases Full Development Projections 1.3 million annual divertible truckloads 28 dedicated Crescent trains 1,100 mile average length of haul Phase I Terminals Phase II Terminals Phase III Terminal New Orleans 14

Growth Plan First Phase 2012 Projections Phase I 460,000 loads 12 trains 1,100 mile average length of haul Phase 1 New Terminals Phase 1 Expansions Phase 1 Existing Capacity 15

Northern Crescent Intermodal Terminals Kansas City Chicago Harrisburg Intermodal Facility: New Crescent Corridor Loads - 65K Total Lifts - 432K Franklin Columbus County Intermodal Facility: Cincinnati New Crescent Corridor Loads - 85K Buffalo BethIntermodal: New Crescent Corridor Loads - 101K Total Lifts - 181K North Jersey Intermodal Facilities: New Crescent Corridor Loads - 66K Total Lifts - 354K Philadelphia Intermodal Facility: New Crescent Corridor Loads - 72k Charlotte Atlanta Total Lifts = 2008 Lifts + New Crescent Lifts 16

Philadelphia Navy Yard Intermodal Facility Phase 1: 1 train inbound and 1 train outbound daily 8,600 pad track (2 tracks) Use reachstackers to reach 2 nd track 700 parking spaces 3 storage tracks $11 million addition to existing terminal 72,000 new Crescent lifts 17

273,000 Fewer Trucks 92,000 Fewer Trucks 480,000 Fewer Trucks 85,000 Fewer Trucks 15,000 Fewer Trucks 19,000 Fewer Trucks 164,000 Fewer Trucks *Public benefits derived from Cambridge Systematics analysis 690,000 Annual Trucks Diverted 10 Million Gallons of Fuel Saved 110,000 Tons Reduced Tons of CO 2 $5 Million Pavement Savings $44 Million Congestion Savings $9 Million Safety Savings $155 Million Logistics Savings $222 Million Total Annual Public Benefits Note: Trucks passing through Harrisburg and Bethlehem are counted twice 10/10/09

92,000 Fewer Trucks 76,000 Fewer Trucks 10/11/09 168,000 Annual Trucks Diverted 2.3 Million Gallons of Fuel Saved 26,000 Tons Reduced Tons of CO2 $1.25 Million Pavement Savings $14 Million Congestion Savings $2 Million Safety Savings $61 Million Logistics Savings $80 Million Total Annual Public Benefits 19 *Public benefits derived from Cambridge Systematics analysis

20

Crescent s Economic Impact on Pennsylvania by 2030 *Economic impact analysis performed by Insight Research Corporation 21

Philadelphia Intermodal Facility s Economic Impact by 2030 *Economic impact analysis performed by Insight Research Corporation 22

Philadelphia Intermodal Facility New Industrial Developments by 2020 in the New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland Service Areas At-Risk 14% Potentially-Benefited 33% Industrial Expansions 1.1 million square feet 2.7 million square feet Construction-Related Capital Investments $50 million $118 million Construction Workers 501 1,181 Annual Employment at 2020 325 767 Estimated Annual Payroll at 2020 $9.7 million $23 million *Economic impact analysis performed by Insight Research Corporation of Dallas, TX. 23

Crescent Represents Significant Potential Long haul intermodal services along I-20, I-40, I-59, I-75, I-78, I-81, I-85, and I-95. Corridors are largely undeveloped for intermodal and there are historic and commercial reasons for this. Market share is currently very low for rail intermodal. Significant highway congestion on portions of these routes, and a high proportion generated from freight. Existing trucker interest in developing services in this corridor; NS will also explore carload opportunities. Well over one million divertible truckloads in this corridor. Requires NS to be competitive with single-driver transit times and with high reliability/consistency in service. 24

25