Alviso Ponds and Santa Clara County Working Group Meeting. San Jose/Santa Clara WPCP. June 6, 2007

Similar documents
Integrating Sea Level Rise Considerations in the South Bay Salt Ponds Restoration Project. Norma J. Camacho Chief Operating Officer, Watersheds

South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project Long-Term Restoration Planning

[FWS R8 R 2016 N061; FXRS282108E8PD0 167 F ] South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, Phase 2 at the Eden Landing Ecological

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE STUDY SCOPING COMMENTS

Turning the Tide. David Sanger

Estuarine Restoration in San Francisco Bay: Design and Adaptive Management. Environmental Management of Enclosed Coastal Seas

1. INTRODUCTION. 1.1 Overview of the SBSP Restoration Project

1. INTRODUCTION. 1.1 Overview of the SBSP Restoration Project

3.9 Public Health and Vector Management

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation November 6, 2008 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SALT PONDS RESTORATION: PHASE I IMPLEMENTATION

10. INDEX. South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project December 2007 Final Environmental Impact Statement/Report

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE STUDY Alviso Ponds and Santa Clara County Interim Feasibility Study PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

Coastal Texas Protection and Restoration Study

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - PART 4 GOLD STREET EDUCATION CENTER $1.38M FOR WHAT?

3.14 Public Services Physical Setting. Methodology

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT TRAVIS J. RAYFIELD, PE, PMP LIEUTENANT COLONEL, US ARMY DISTRICT COMMANDER/ENGINEER

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation June 16, 2005 PIER 94 WETLAND ENHANCEMENT. File No Project Manager: Joan Cardellino

SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT: SPARTINA CONTROL PROGRAM

Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge and Wallops Island National Wildlife

Preliminary Feasibility Study for South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Economic Impact Areas 1-10 Executive Summary

Appendix E. Civil Design and Cost Engineering

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation June 30, 2004

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation May 18, 2005 NAPA RIVER SALT MARSH RESTORATION PROJECT FINAL DESIGN FOR PHASE 2

3.15 Utilities Physical Setting. Methodology

APPENDIX B ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT, SCREENING, AND ANALYSIS

Santa Clara River Watershed Feasibility Study. Information Meeting City of Santa Clarita August 16, 2007

California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region. Tentative Order No. R XXXX

Fisheries and Aquatic Habitat Collaborative Effort. September 1, 2005 Pat Showalter ext 2939

Presenter: CLYDE HUNT. Project Manager Memphis District August 2010

NEW YORK NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT

7/11/2018. Floodplain Management Association - June 14, 2018 luncheon

3.15 Utilities Physical Setting. Methodology

January US Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District South Atlantic Division

South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project Stakeholder Forum. Outcomes from the May 25, 2004 Habitat Restoration Workgroup

COASTAL TX PROTECTION AND RESTORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY

Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Report, Phase 2

Pacheco Reservoir Expansion

Webinar for the Natural Floodplain Function Alliance 18 November 2013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. S.1 Introduction

Flood Protection Meets Climate Change

7.6 Lake Aquilla Storage Reallocation

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 11, 2003 LAGUNA DE SANTA ROSA: RESTORATION MANAGEMENT PLAN AND PHASE II SEDIMENTATION STUDY

Coastal Wetlands. About Coastal Wetlands. Contact Us. Water: Wetlands. You are here: Water Our Waters Wetlands Coastal Wetlands

VEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES POLICIES

Major east-west trending highways and bridges that provide connections to the communities on both sides of the Bay include:

3.16 Utilities Physical Setting. Methodology

NEPA Scoping Meeting Rahway River Basin, New Jersey Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study

ROSS VALLEY FLOOD PROTECTION & WATERSHED PROGRAM U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CORTE MADERA CREEK PROJECT. Community Meeting.

WATERSHED MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE: GOALS & IMPLEMENTATION OBJECTIVES, JULY 26, 1999

3.10 Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice

Pierce County Islands and the Head of Lake Pepin

Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Investigation Update on Draft Feasibility Report and State Funding Application

CHAPTER 9 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

STRATEGIC PLAN Jug Bay Wetlands Sanctuary STRATEGIC PLAN

SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT AS A RISK REDUCTION TOOL PROJECT. Angela Angove Pierce County Public Works

Chapter 1 Introduction

Valuing Ecosystem Services from Sandy-Related Salt Marsh Restoration at Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge (NJ)

Kīlauea Point National Wildlife Refuge, Kaua i County, HI; Comprehensive. Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact for Environmental

DRAFT ANNOTATED OUTLINE 12/4/2006

3.15 Utilities Physical Setting. Methodology

Restore America s Estuaries October 24, 2012

12.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND OTHER REQUIRED ANALYSES

8.1 Introduction. 8.2 Description of Alternatives. Chapter 8 Alternatives Analysis

Let s drain this here swamp! We must protect this sensitive wetland ecosystem!

Public Notice. Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF Date: April 18, Name: Chandler Peter Phone Number:

What is an ecosystem?

Lake Andes National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Lake Andes, SD; Draft. Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment

SOAP LAKE FLOODPLAIN PRESERVATION PROJECT

Public Notice October 21, 2016 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District

5.2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND WETLANDS

2016 Annual Self-Monitoring Report Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Fremont, California

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation August 2, 2012 MIDDLE BAIR ISLAND WETLAND RESTORATION. Project No Project Manager: Brenda Buxton

Sovereign Lands and Great Salt Lake

FACT SHEET: FEMA GRANT FUNDING FOR OAKLAND HILLS CITY OF OAKLAND August 27, 2015

Gulf of Mexico Hydrological Restoration Criteria for Identifying and Prioritizing Projects

Saving Wetlands. Is saving Lives

Brief History of RCD Mitigation Work and the ILFP

Remediation of Impacts to Wetlands

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation March 2, 2006 BALLONA WETLANDS ENHANCEMENT PLANNING. File No Project Manager: Mary Small

MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (MMR) REGIONAL CORRIDOR

PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT

DRAFT FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT. for. Tioga Sports Park

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT

New Jersey Back Bays Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study. Ocean and Burlington Counties Mayor s Meeting Toms River, NJ June 19, 2018

NEW YORK NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT

Navigational Channel Dredging, Beneficial Reuse and the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration (SBSP) at Eden Landing, Alameda County

Article 20. Definitions

Long-term Management Plan For The Mitigation Bank

Long-term Management Plan For The Mitigation Bank

There is a reliable, clean water supply for current and future generations.

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation April 2, 2009 INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT Project Manager: Maxene Spellman

Uvas Creek Levee Rehabilitation Project City of Gilroy Council Meeting June 4, 2018

The Colley Bay Story: Successful Implementation of a Living Shoreline

7.9 Lake Whitney Reallocation

Identifying and Integrating Priorities for Marine Conservation and Management

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Lower Platte South NRD Past and Present 1. Map of Lower Platte South NRD 2. Vision for the Future 3.

BENEFICIAL REUSE OF DREDGE MATERIAL SOUTH BAY SALT POND RESTORATION PROJECT PHASE 2

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 8, 2005 BALLONA WETLANDS ENHANCEMENT PLANNING. File No Project Manager: Mary Small

Preferred Alternative Proposal

Transcription:

Alviso Ponds and Santa Clara County San Jose/Santa Clara WPCP June 6, 2007 1 Today s s Welcome and Introductions Working Group Charter SBSP Project Schedule FWS NWR Compatibility Determinations Phase 1 in the Alviso Pond Complex South SF Bay Shoreline Study Outreach Opportunities Next Steps 2 June 6, 2007 Meeting 1

Alviso Ponds and Santa Clara County Working Group Charter See Handout 3 Project Schedule (pending review of comments) Final EIS/EIR Late Summer/Fall 2007 Record of Decision and Permitting End of 2007 Phase 1 Implementation 2008 and 2009 Future actions and phases the next 30+ years 4 June 6, 2007 Meeting 2

Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Where Wildlife Comes First! 5 Compatibility By law, Wildlife Refuges are closed to all public uses unless the use is found appropriate and compatible. Only wildlife and habitat improvement projects are allowed. 6 June 6, 2007 Meeting 3

How Do We Create Balance between Use of Refuge by Public and protection of wildlife? We start by considering the laws & regulations governing what is allowed on the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay NWR. 7 Appropriate Use & Compatible? Congress requires that Refuge Managers determine if proposed projects & activities are compatible with the purpose of the Refuge & Refuge System. 8 June 6, 2007 Meeting 4

Mission of Refuge System Administer network of lands/waters for: Conservation, Management, Restoration of fish, wildlife and plant resources and their habitats for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans 9 Purposes of Don Edwards Refuge Preserve and enhance wildlife habitat in south San Francisco Bay; Protect migratory waterfowl and Endangered Species; and Provide an opportunity for wildlife- oriented recreation and nature study 10 June 6, 2007 Meeting 5

Compatibility Determinations 1 st step: Consider needs of wildlife and potential for impact on wildlife. Balance wildlife needs Balance the needs of endangered species with resident and migratory wildlife. Then look for opportunities for public access. 11 Priority Public Uses 2 nd Step: Consider priority uses Congress established 6 Wildlife-Oriented Public Uses that take priority over all others: Wildlife observation & photography, Interpretation & environmental education, Hunting & fishing. 12 June 6, 2007 Meeting 6

Resources Available? 3 rd Step: Are resources available to administer and manage each use? Is there staff and money to construct and maintain the public use facilities? 13 Other Considerations? NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act), Endangered Species Act, Migratory Bird Conservation Act, Clean Water Act Coastal Zone Mgt. Act 14 June 6, 2007 Meeting 7

Public Input Make determination on what is appropriate and compatible based on public input, facts as included in EIS/R, written compatibility determination and Refuge Manager s s best professional judgment. 15 Questions 16 June 6, 2007 Meeting 8

Phase 1 in the Alviso Ponds Complex 17 18 June 6, 2007 Meeting 9

19 20 June 6, 2007 Meeting 10

21 22 June 6, 2007 Meeting 11

23 24 June 6, 2007 Meeting 12

Alviso Ponds & Santa Clara County 25 26 June 6, 2007 Meeting 13

Alviso Ponds & Santa Clara County 27 Trail Location Approximate Location of Proposed Gates on Cargill Property Approximate Proposed Moffett Fence Realignment 28 June 6, 2007 Meeting 14

Shoreline Study Status Report Briefing to the Alviso Ponds and Santa Clara County Working Group Beth Dyer & Yvonne LeTellier June 6, 2007 29 Shoreline Study Overview What is it? Federal Project Authorized in 2002; Funded in 2003 Tidal and fluvial flood damage reduction Environmental Restoration Other purposes 30 June 6, 2007 Meeting 15

31 Shoreline Study Overview (continued) Reconnaissance Study Feasibility Study focused area because: Expensive to address entire area 32 June 6, 2007 Meeting 16

33 Shoreline Study Overview (continued) Reconnaissance Study Feasibility Study focused area because: Expensive to address entire area High flood risk Available local sponsors: SCVWD & Conservancy Largest acreage South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Alviso Ponds/Santa Clara County First Interim Feasibility Study = Shoreline Study for now 34 June 6, 2007 Meeting 17

35 Linkage Between Shoreline Study & SBSP Project Shared Purpose: habitat restoration, flood protection & public access in South Bay Shared Personnel: Shoreline Study Management Team: Conservancy, SCVWD, Corps, & FWS Terminology 36 June 6, 2007 Meeting 18

SBSP & Shoreline Study Integration: Habitat SBSP Create, restore, enhance habitat: Special status plant and animals Migratory bird species Native species (aquatic & terrestrial) Shoreline Restore habitat quantity, quality and connectivity: Special status species Migratory bird species Native species (aquatic & terrestrial) 37 SBSP & Shoreline Study Integration: Flood Protection SBSP Maintain or improve existing levels Shoreline Reduce flood damages Reduce risk to public health & safety 38 June 6, 2007 Meeting 19

SBSP & Shoreline Study Integration: Public Access SBSP Public access and recreation compatible with wildlife goals Shoreline Public access, education, and recreation in study area 39 SBSP & Shoreline Study Integration: Water & Sediment Quality SBSP Protect existing quality, and consider ecological risks of restoration Shoreline Avoid, minimize or mitigate impacts to quality 40 June 6, 2007 Meeting 20

SBSP & Shoreline Study Integration: Vectors, Predation & Invasives SBSP Maintain or improve vector management Control predation Manage spread of invasives Shoreline Avoid, minimize or mitigate impacts to: Vector populations Predator access Reduce/control invasives 41 SBSP & Shoreline Study Integration: Infrastructure SBSP Protect services provided by infrastructure Shoreline Avoid, minimize or mitigate impacts to infrastructure function 42 June 6, 2007 Meeting 21

Shoreline Project Schedule Public Scoping Meeting January 2006 Complete Future W/O Project Conditions Analysis June 2008 Measures Identification & Alternative Formulation April 2007 through May 2010 Draft Integrated Feasibility Report and EIS/R May 2010 Public Meeting on Draft Feasibility Report and EIS/R July 2010 Final Integrated Feasibility Report and EIS/R November 2010 Chief s Report Signed July 2011 43 Questions? 44 June 6, 2007 Meeting 22

Outreach Opportunities Contact Tracy Grubbs at t.grubbs@sbcglobal.net 45 June 6, 2007 Meeting 23