TRIP REPORT ARCONA ROAD VALVE SITE INFILTRATION TESTING

Similar documents
TRIP REPORT BOOT ROAD EFRD SITE INFILTRATION TESTING

November 13, IP3406. Mr. Uriah Sowell Rooney Engineering 115 Inverness Drive East, Suite 300, Englewood, CO 80112

November 13, IP3406. Mr. Uriah Sowell Rooney Engineering 115 Inverness Drive East, Suite 300, Englewood, CO 80112

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration concerning the design of the taxiway rehabilitation. Description

PROJECT NO A. ISSUED: February 29, 2016

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. 158 Attachment 2. Borough of Perkasie

Stormwater Standards. Clackamas County Service District No. 1. Infiltration Testing Guide

April 7, Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1

Experience Background

The following sections provide the approved standard infiltration testing specifications.

Geotechnical Investigation Long Timber Brewing Building Highway 99 and Kelly Street Monroe, Oregon TABLE OF CONTENTS

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION 40 CFR (c)(1)(i)-(xii) PLANT MCDONOUGH ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

PART 2D. Section 7.2 of SJRWMD Special Publication SJ93-SP10

PART 1b. Section 7.2 of SJRWMD Special Publication SJ93-SP10

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION 40 CFR (c)(1)(i)-(xii) PLANT MCDONOUGH ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

November 9, Tredyffrin Township Stephen Burgo, PE Township Engineer 1100 Duportail Road Berwyn, PA

The Presby Wastewater Treatment System

Septic Tank Soil Treatment Systems

March 28, Port of Kalama Mr. Jacobo Salan 380 West Marine Drive Kalama, Washington 98625

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

How & Where does infiltration work? Context: Summary of Geologic History Constraints/benefits for different geologic units

Attachment A HDD Table Allegheny County

Appendix A. Infiltration and Soil Texture Testing Methods. Appendix A. A.1 General Description. A.2 Infiltration Testing: A Four-Step Process

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION & ASSESSMENT TO ESTIMATE AQUIFER PARAMETERS

Typical Subsurface Profile. November 28, 2016

The Presby Wastewater Treatment System

August 15, 2006 (Revised) July 3, 2006 Project No A

ORLANDO SANFORD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT OUTPARCEL 6 SANFORD, FLORIDA

Report of Exploratory Test Pits

Presented by: David Albus, RCE, GE

1. Introduction Site Information Site Characteristics Hydrogeologic Setting... 2

To The Applicant For A Small Wastewater System Permit Sheridan County, Wyoming

CITY OF MONTCLAIR Montclair Civic Center 5111 Benito Street Montclair, CA 91763

ORLANDO SANFORD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT OUTPARCEL 1 SANFORD, FLORIDA

3.2 INFILTRATION TRENCH

Appendix 10-A. Optional Recharge Volume Approach

Civil Geotechnical Surveying

Background. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Farmstead Water Supply Evaluation. AEM Principle: Glossary

MEMORANDUM. TO: STUART OLSON DOMINION CONSTRUCTION LTD. DATE: JANUARY 31, 14 ATTENTION: MR. Dave Bauder, Construction Manager KENNY K. C.KO, P.ENG.

CHAPTER 7 PHYSICAL INVENTORY OF THE CITY

Off Site Discharge Analysis. Pennsylvania Pipeline Project. February Prepared for:

Results of Onsite Percolation Testing Ellis Commons Senior Housing Development APN City of Perris, California

June 2017 C.3 Workshop Sizing Example. Section II.B Sizing Volume-Based Treatment Measures based on the Adapted CASQA Stormwater BMP Handbook Approach

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

A. GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION. Applicant s name Day Phone Installer Name Send permit to installer. B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP Chapter 290: WATERSHED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article IV: Stormwater Management

Native Soil Assessment for Small Infiltration- Based Stormwater Control Measures

Infiltration Trench. Image: Cahill Associates, Inc.

A. GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION. Applicant s name Day Phone Installer Name Send permit to installer. B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Erosion and Sedimentation Pollution Control (ESPC) Plan Narrative

UC SANTA CRUZ NATIVE SOIL ASSESSMENT FOR SMALL INFILTRATION BASED STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURES

A-2. Soils. Soil Media. Chapter Contents. Soil Media In-situ Soil Testing Separation from Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT)

CHECKLIST FOR ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT/SAMPLING

***NO SEPTIC SYSTEM EXCAVATION WITHOUT AN APPROVED PERMIT IN POSSESSION****

PERVIOUS PAVEMENT. Alternative Names: Permeable Pavement, Porous Concrete, Porous Pavers

BMP Description: The GSWMD will work with NIRPC and local groups to mark existing storm sewer structures.

March 10, 2017 SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION

CONDUCTED FOR: PREPARED FOR: 18 October 2010 YPC Project No. 10GY133

Transitioning from the Percolation Test to Soils Evaluation Colorado Environmental Health Association Annual Education Conference 2015

Jacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc.

Geotechnical Engineering Report

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

A SunCam online continuing education course. Design of Drywells. David E. Fantina, PE

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Common Construction-Site BMPs Quick Reference Guide

Forest Glen Recreation Residence Septic System Improvements Soils Report Shasta-Trinity National Forest January 2011

ITEM 706 PIPE SLOPE DRAIN

Stormwater Management Studies in Areas Undergoing Reconstruction Following the Tornado that Hit Tuscaloosa, AL

Infiltration Testing For Stormwater BMPs: What Would Mickey Mouse Do?

June i TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROJECT INFORMATION. 1.1 Site Location. October 4, Jerry Schwab/President 315 Aden Ave., Suite 26 Glendale, CA 91203

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

TELEPHONE: (215) Addendum No. 1

Wyoming Water Quality Application Form Permit to Construct Small Wastewater System. Complete attached package and submit to appropriate office:

What is the Vadose Zone? Why Do We Care? Tiffany Messer Assistant Professor Biological Systems Engineering School of Natural Resources University of

June 28, Test Well Flow Rate Report MSD Underground Injection Control Wells City of Richlawn Louisville, Kentucky 40207


Soil Class Handouts Greeley Colorado October 22 & 23, 2015

Permeability Field Investigation

Other Septic Tank Effluent Dispersal Options

Measured Seepage of the Main Canal Brownsville Irrigation District

AESI AESI 6/17/2015 HOW AND WHERE DOES INFILTRATION WORK? o Context: Summary of Geologic History. o Constraints/benefits for different geologic units

Geotechnical Engineering Report

MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS REVISIONS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 103D.341. Adopted April 24, 2014 Effective June 6, 2014

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for Ponds

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for Ponds

CCR Rule Operating Criteria Closure Plan

Shelbyville, Kentucky Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Stormwater Pollution Treatment Practices (Structural) DRAFT

Suggested Stormwater Management Practices For Individual House Lots

Re: Geotechnical Consultation for Storm Infiltration Robert Louis Stevenson ES Modernization th Avenue San Francisco, California

CHAPTER 4 GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION

SOILS INFORMATION FOR GEORGIA

POND CONSTRUCTION. Woodland Steward Series

N.J.A.C. 7:8 Stormwater Management Rules - Design and Performance Standards. Nonstructural Strategies Assist with Strategy #2; See Page 3

Rock Sock (RS) Rock Sock height.

Replacement Wastewater Disposal System Permit Application

CONDUCTED FOR: PREPARED FOR: 5 May 2016 YPC Project No. 16GY146

Stormwater Management Standards for Pennsylvania. Another. A presentation from The Other Side of the Table

Transcription:

TRIP REPORT ARCONA ROAD VALVE SITE INFILTRATION TESTING 1.0 PURPOSE This Trip Report presents the field data and results of double-ring soil infiltration tests conducted to support the design of a stormwater management system at the Arcona Road Valve site located in Lower Allen Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, as part of the Pennsylvania Pipeline Project (PPP) for Sunoco Pipeline, LP. Two deep and two shallow tests (IT-A and IT-B) were performed at the site. The test locations are listed by coordinates (latitude and longitude) in Table 1 and shown on the attached figure. 2.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES The infiltration tests were conducted by Mark Mengel and Kevin Schwab of Tetra Tech, Inc., on October 04, 2016. The test locations were positioned in the field using a handheld, WAASenabled GPS unit. Table 1 provides the coordinates of the test locations. Both tests were located in a tall grassy area, between an existing valve site and an impoundment pond. The infiltration tests were performed in accordance with the procedure specified in the 2006 Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual. The test locations were prepared with hand tools and a mini-excavator, and care was taken to minimize disturbance of the soil surface to be tested. Double-ring infiltrometers were used for testing and consisted of 10-inch diameter and 6-inch diameter sections of steel casing, each 10 inches in height. After digging to the target depth, the test surface was leveled, and loose soil and debris were removed. The rings were driven a minimum of 2 inches into the soil. The infiltration test depths are presented in Table 1. Test locations were pre-soaked for 1 hour. The tests were then conducted with measurements at 10-minute or 30-minute intervals, based on the observed water level drops during the last half of the pre-soak period. Pre-soak and test information was recorded on infiltration test data sheets; copies of the test data sheets are attached to this report. During the testing, the weather was sunny, approximately 65-70 degrees Fahrenheit, and no precipitation was observed during the time of testing. Additionally, less than 0.5 inches of precipitation was observed 24 hours prior to testing. Test pits were excavated near each testing location to characterize the soil, determine the depth to bedrock, if encountered, and inspect for evidence of the seasonal high water table. The test pits were identified with the corresponding infiltration test name. The test pits were machineexcavated to 2 feet below the target infiltration test depth or refusal, whichever was encountered first. Descriptions of the soil were recorded on field logs, which were based on the form example in the BMP manual. Copies of the field soil logs are attached to this report.

3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Description Soils encountered generally consisted of a relatively deep (up to 12.2 inches) dark brown (7.5YR 3/2) topsoil/surface layer composed of a silt loam with small roots throughout. This surface layer was underlain by more developed illuvial layers which trended from a silt clay to a clay with depth. Soil in the illuvial layers found near the IT-B test location contained slightly more clay which resulted in a slightly less permeable layer than that found in IT-A. Roughly 2-5% of the soil consisted of small quartzite channers and colors of the subsurface consisted mainly of a strong brown (7.5YR 5/6-7.5YR 4/6). The total depth of the soil profile was terminated at roughly 5 ft bgs with no bedrock encountered. Seasonal high water was not observed at the testing location, nor was any mottling observed. According to United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey data, the soil type for the test location is mapped as follows: Edom Silt Loam - (EdB soil symbol) with 3-8 percent slopes; with medium runoff and well drained. 3.2 Infiltration Tests Results Table 1 summarizes the infiltration rates (inches per hour) calculated from the test data. Infiltration rates presented in Table 1 were calculated from the average water level drop of the last four stabilized readings measured in the inner ring. The pre-soak test results for IT-B (deep) indicated a low infiltration rate, requiring a 30 minute test cycle; whereas, the pre-soak test results for IT-A (surface and deep) and IT-B (surface) indicated high infiltration rates, requiring 10 minute test cycles.

Table 1 Summary of Infiltration Test Results Arcona Road Valve Lower Allen Township, Cumberland County, PA Sunoco PPP Test Location (IT-) LATITUDE Location Data LONGITUDE Test Depth (inches) Infiltration Test Result (inches/hour) IT-A (shallow) 40.192904-076.9469980 2 7.90 IT-A (deep) 36 5.25 IT-B (shallow) 40.1929837-076.9471253 2 12.40 IT-B (deep) 36 0.20

Figure 1 Infiltration Tests Infiltration Testing Locations Arcona Road Valve Soil Type: Edom Silty Clay Loam (EdB) Cumberland County, PA Legend N 2016 Google 200 ft

ATTACHMENTS

SOIL LOGS

INFILTRATION TEST DATA SHEETS