North American LNG 2006

Similar documents
On Board Regasification for LNG Ships. 22 nd World Gas Conference WS 3-2 Tokyo 2003 Wayne Perry

LNG in the United States

Innovations for the Global LNG Industry Bringing Continents of Energy Together Marine Technology Society March 22, 2007

FSRUs: Accommodating Emerging Markets Gas and Power Needs

West Coast -- Cabrillo Port: Cracking the California Code

member of the TSAKOS GROUP of companies

LNG Import Facility Infrastructure Options

LNG Business In India

PERP Program LNG Receiving Terminals New Report Alert

TEMA LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The Adoption of FSRU For Cost-effective LNG Import Solution

FSRUs & Security of Supply in Israel s Natural Gas Market

American Institute of Marine Underwriters

Höegh LNG - The FSRU provider. Presentation at Marine Money Week 2017 Sveinung J.S. Støhle President & CEO

A Leader In Maritime Technology

ASX/MEDIA RELEASE 23 APRIL 2015 MAGNOLIA LNG PROJECT TOLLING AGREEMENT UPDATE WITH MERIDIAN LNG

Anatomy of LNG Shipping & Operations

Floating offshore gas units

Trelleborg Marine Systems A Comprehensive Approach to FLNG Docking & Mooring Systems

INTRODUCTION TO FLNG/FSRU TECHNOLOGY

The Technical & Practical challenges of FLNG

Handling and Transportation of LNG

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment [ESIA] for Proposed Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project at Tema in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana

LNG Impact on U.S. Domestic Natural Gas Markets

Cleaner energy and shipping in Indonesia Small scale LNG. By: Jan Valkier

Marine Technology Society Houston, Texas April 28, Energy Bridge. Bringing Continents of Energy Together

ECO-FRIENDLY LNG SRV: COMPLETION OF THE REGAS TRIAL

Introduction. FLNG: Costs and Cost Drivers. What is FLNG (and what isn t) FLNG Project Costs

ECONOMIC COMPARISON BETWEEN OIL AND LNG FOR DECISION MAKING TO EVALUATE WHICH PRODUCT TO DEVELOP FROM A DEEPWATER WEST AFRICA FIELD

1) 2) 3) 4) 5) The oil and gas cycle. Life cycle of oil and gas (time) Potential requirement on ground

The Evolving Global LNG Industry South Africa Gas Options, Cape Town, 3 rd 5 th October 2016

LNG IMPORT OPTIONS STUDY REPORT

Marine Facilities for LNG Carrier Transfer Alternatives

Elastopor Sustainable solution for cryogenic insulation

New energy for Italy

THE TRANSFER OF LNG IN OFFSHORE CONDITIONS. SAME SONG NEW SOUND

LNG Market Prospects. Mr Jae Sung Choi. 1 st November, 2017

EXMAR GROUP: Leadership Through Innovation

LNG strategy and the outlook for global gas markets

TEMA LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Floating Regasification The Aegean LNG terminal

Norwegian Solutions for LNG in International Market

Design Concept and Features of the Mitsubishi LNG-FPSO (Floating Production, Storage and Offloading Unit)

Excelerate Energy: Efficient And Cost-Effective Solutions for the Global Gas Market

Comparison of Netbacks from Potential LNG Project with ALCAN Pipeline Project

LNG PUMPS FOR FLOATING STORAGE AND REGAS UNIT

Multiple screw pumps on FPSO vessels

KOGAS s Technical Capability and Plan on Off-shore Plant Business

LNG Facts A Primer. Presentation before US Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, LNG Forums. March 10, Kristi A. R.

LNG supply Chain From the LNG receiving terminal to the LNG truck TrainMoS II

US Hydrocarbon Exports Presented by

LNG Houston, February 6-7 th, The case for developing a Floating LNG Receiving Terminal on the US East Coast

Overview of LNG in the United States

Nearshore Regasification Terminals and FSRUs

Micro Motion Developments in HFO & LNG metering Per Stenhammar. Business Development Manager

ACCELERATION OF SMALL SCALE LNG SUPPLY CHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE FOR CENTRAL AND EAST REGION OF INDONESIA

LNG Importation Initiative. Saldanha Cape Town Corridor. Fossil Fuel Foundation 21 May 2014

Region 4 Liquefied Natural Gas Ports. Onshore and Offshore LNG Ports March 2007

Unit 4: Oil and Gas Development

6th Annual LNG Transport Handling & Storage 2016 Forum. FSRU as The Pivotal Point for Effective LNG Distribution

Development of Efficient, Environmentally Friendly and Flexible Shipboard Regasification Vessel

RISE OF THE FSRU AND THE LNG MARKET OUTLOOK.

Need For The Project

We deliver gas infrastructure

LNG Import Terminals: Challenges and Opportunities

Introduction, Vision and Team Q2 2019

Classification of the Largest Ever Floating Storage Regasification Unit

Seismic Analysis of an SPB Tank Installed in the Offshore GBS LNG Terminal

LNG BUNKERING VESSELS AND CNG CARRIERS -Innovative solutions to improve sustainability- LNG/SHORE POWER Workshop TRIESTE 10 th of March 2016

Product Line FGS FLOATING GAS SOLUTIONS OVERVIEW

The U.S Market for Liquid Natural Gas: Better Out than In Natasha Allen HSA10-5 The Economics of Oil and Energy April 4, 2013

REPUBLIC OF KENYA MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND PETROLEUM KENYA PETROLEUM TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (KEPTAP) PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT (PMU)

Floating LNG Business A breakthrough in offshore gas monetization

Adriatic LNG Terminal (ALT) Roger D. Leick ALT Topsides Manager

Offshore Liquid FPSO Measurement Systems Class 2450

Click to edit Master title style

Regulation of Vessels and Infrastructure to Support LNG Fueling Operations in the U.S.

An Exporter s Perspective

GRAIN LNG Challenges & benefits for the deployment of LNG in ports. October 2017 BPA Conference, Poole, UK

AES CORPORATION. LNG Review. Aaron Samson Director, LNG Projects

Global LNG Supply and Demand All Planned Supply

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. / Cheniere Energy, Inc. Proposed Sabine Pass LNG Facility Expansion Adding Liquefaction Capabilities.

RIM LNG Trade Annual 2010 Edition

Liquefied Natural Gas Terminals Services and solutions

The Shale Invasion: Will U.S. LNG Cross the Pond? New terminals ramp up exports.

Joanna C. Martin Ziegenfuss BERKELEY RESEARCH GROUP, LLC 1800 M Street, 2 nd Floor Washington, DC

Floating Liquefaction Project Overview February 2016

Update on African regasification terminals March 15, 2016

PHILADELPHIA GAS WORKS LNG SALES AND ASSET OPTIMIZATION RFP # Questions & Answers April 26, 2016

Small Scale LNG From Concept to Reality. Chris Johnson, General Manager, LNG New Markets, Shell

Loading Master for Oil, LNG/Gas & Petrochemical Terminals Apr 2019, Dubai 29 Sep - 03 Oct 2019, Dubai

LNG Systems for Marine Application. LNG Reliquefaction & LNG Regasification. Oil & Gas Systems

Finding Petroleum FPSO Conference

PIPED-GAS REGULATION FEBRUARY 2017

IMPACT OF US LNG ON LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN GAS DEMANDS

Prospects for North American LNG Exports

Commonality of GoM Lightering Experience with GoM Shuttling

Federal Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Overview From the Eastern Gulf of Mexico Perspective

Enabling LNG Infrastructure

VIRTUAL PIPELINES & MOBILE NATURAL GAS FUEL SOLUTIONS

Transcription:

Market and technology analysis Our ability to expand our use of liquefied natural gas is limited because today we have just five receiving terminals around the United States. - George W. Bush US President Reference Code: LNG/0106 Publication Date: February 2006 U U

ABOUT UTILIS ENERGY ABOUT UTILIS ENERGY Utilis Energy is a new kind of research firm. With offices in New York City and London, we specialize in providing the global energy industry with market research of unparalleled quality. The Utilis team is comprised of highly qualified professionals, all of whom have developed their expertise through years of experience in the energy sector. Our mission Our mission, simply stated, is to help our clients make better-informed business decisions. We provide our clients with: Timely industry information and analysis Unmatched insight from energy specialists Client focused support structure P Utilis Energy LLC All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher, Utilis Energy LLC. The facts of this report are believed to be correct at the time of publication but cannot be guaranteed. Please note that the findings, conclusions and recommendations that Utilis Energy delivers will be based on information gathered in good faith from both primary and secondary sources, whose accuracy we are not always in a position to guarantee. As such Utilis Energy can accept no liability whatever for actions taken based on any information that may subsequently prove to be incorrect. Utilis Energy, Published 02/2006 Page 2

CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 9 Introduction 12 Existing import terminals 12 US natural gas market fundamentals 16 LNG economics 16 Import terminal cost considerations 17 US natural gas demand 19 US natural gas production 20 US natural gas prices 20 US LNG demand 21 LNG pricing 28 Global natural gas demand 28 Conclusions 29 US LNG developments 30 Introduction 30 Energy Policy Act 30 Conclusions 33 North American LNG project summary 34 Utilis Energy, Published 02/2006 Page 3

CONTENTS Gulf Coast projects 36 East Coast projects 38 West Coast projects 39 LNG project overview 39 Project opposition 40 Conclusions 41 Offshore regas technologies 43 Introduction 43 Catalyst for development 44 Offshore LNG receiving technologies 45 Gasification systems utilized by offshore facilities 46 Offshore economics 48 Conclusions 49 Gravity-based systems 50 Key points 50 Introduction 50 LNG projects planning to use gravity-based terminals 53 GBS engineering firms 55 Conclusions 57 Existing oil/gas platforms 59 Key points 59 Utilis Energy, Published 02/2006 Page 4

CONTENTS Introduction 59 Platform conversion projects 60 Conclusions 70 Floating Storage & Regasification Units (FSRU) 72 Key points 72 Introduction 72 Operational issues 74 FSRU projects 78 FSRU economics 80 Conclusions 82 Regasificaiton vessels 83 Key points 83 Introduction 83 Excelerate Energy Energy Bridge System 84 Advanced Production and Loading 88 Hoegh LNG 88 Conclusions 89 Recommendations & Conclusions 90 Introduction 90 Summary of offshore LNG strengths and weaknesses 91 Utilis Energy, Published 02/2006 Page 5

CONTENTS FIGURES Figure 1: US natural gas production, 1990-2004 20 Figure 2: US wellhead natural gas prices, 1990-2004 21 Figure 3: US LNG sector demand, 2015 22 Figure 4: Flow of US natural gas imports/exports, 2004 23 Figure 5: US LNG imports by terminal, 2004 26 Figure 6: US LNG imports by country of origin, 2004 (MMcf) 27 Figure 7: Average price of LNG imports, 1990-2004 ($/Mcf) 28 Figure 8: Current/planned deepwater LNG ports 31 Figure 9: Proposed/existing North American LNG projects, Jan. 2006 34 Figure 10: Offshore LNG facilities 43 Figure 11: LNG regas import terminals segmented by water depth 46 Figure 12: Offshore LNG regasification systems 47 Figure 13: Gravity based LNG regas structure 51 Figure 14: Isola di Porto Levante LNG receiving terminal 54 Figure 15: Aker Kvaerner depiction of a GBS LNG facility 56 Figure 16: Saipem offshore GBS LNG facility 57 Figure 17: Existing platform conversion to LNG terminal 59 Figure 18: Crystal Energy s Platform Grace 60 Figure 19: Crystal Clearwater Port Project 61 Figure 20: Elevation view of Crystal Clearwater LNG project 62 Utilis Energy, Published 02/2006 Page 6

CONTENTS Figure 21: MPEH LNG receiving terminal 64 Figure 22: MPEH - upper deck configuration 66 Figure 23: MPEH - middle deck configuration 66 Figure 24: MPEH - lower deck configuration 67 Figure 25: MPEH - elevation view 68 Figure 26: Spectrum Energy Services Apollo LNG terminal 69 Figure 27: LNG carrier berthed to an FSRU 73 Figure 28: LNG containment systems 74 Figure 29: FSRU - side by side offloading configuration 75 Figure 30: FSRU to shore LNG pipeline interface 75 Figure 31: Sloshing phenomena shown in membrane tank 76 Figure 32: Location of BHP Billiton s Cabrillio Port LNG project 78 Figure 33: FSRU vs. Onshore LNG regas operating costs 81 Figure 34: Excelerate Energy Energy Bridge System 84 Figure 35: Excelerate EBRV pipeline interconnections 85 Figure 36: APL submerged offloading buoy 86 Figure 37: Energy Bridge mooring system components 87 TABLES Table 1: Summary of offshore regas characteristics 11 Table 2: Existing US LNG terminals 13 Table 3: Basic LNG Economics 17 Utilis Energy, Published 02/2006 Page 7

CONTENTS Table 4: US monthly waterborne LNG imports (Bcf) 24 Table 5: US LNG imports, monthly averages (Bcf/day) 24 Table 6: LNG cargo diversions from US terminals, 2005 (Bcf) 25 Table 7: Source of US LNG Imports, 1995-2000 (Bcf) 27 Table 8: North American LNG project details, Jan. 2006 (a) 35 Table 9: North American LNG project details, Jan. 2006 (b) 36 Table 10: Offshore/Onshore LNG regas terminal cost comparison 48 Table 11: Benefits of concrete and steel LNG storage 52 Table 12: MPEH operational expectations 65 Table 13: Typical FSRU design and operating specifications 74 Table 14: FSRU operating costs (US $) 81 Table 15: Summary of offshore regas characteristics 91 Utilis Energy, Published 02/2006 Page 8

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY North America, and in particular the US, requires additional sources of energy to meet expected increases in demand over the decades to come. While it is commonly known that the US has imported the majority of its crude oil for some time, it is a lesser known fact that US natural gas production has been unable to keep pace with domestic demand and that incremental increases in natural gas imports from Canada are not expected to offset future demand growth. Such market fundamentals, in addition to recent price increases, create a favorable environment for increased imports of LNG which, during 2004, amounted to 652 Bcf, roughly half the expected future demand. However, greater reliance on LNG is stymied by the lack of sufficient capacity at US regasification terminals. Only five such terminals are currently operation in the US and regulatory hurdles and opposition from both public and private bodies has hindered the construction of additional regasification infrastructure. The US LNG market underwent a fundamental change when in August 2005, President George W. Bush signed the Energy Policy Act. This Act clarified the Federal government s role in the siting and operation of onshore and near shore LNG import terminals and gives the FERC the ultimate authority over states on LNG issues. By the end of 2005, the FERC had approved twelve LNG terminals and the US Coast Guard had approved two. Most of these proposed LNG terminals will be sited in the Gulf of Mexico, causing relatively little opposition from a region already accustomed to abundant petroleum industry infrastructure. Twenty more facilities are currently proposed, twelve under the authority of the FERC and the eight offshore under the authority of the Coast Guard. To facilitate the importation and regasification of LNG there has been a rapid expansion in the range of alternative offshore LNG importation methods. These new methods are expected to compete with conventional onshore regasification terminals. The catalyst for alternative, offshore LNG regasification centers on several issues and concerns shared by individuals, communities and governments. These can be broadly defined as: Environmental; Security and safety; and Regulatory. Utilis Energy, Published 02/2006 Page 9

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY One of the most appealing features of offshore LNG import terminals is their lack of environmental impact on shorelines and population centers. An offshore LNG import terminal is a relatively small and isolated installation and in the unlikely event of an accident, few would be affected. The enhanced security and safety of offshore LNG infrastructure is the result of their remoteness. Access to offshore LNG facilities can be monitored and restricted to a much greater extent than onshore installations. US offshore LNG facilities are under the jurisdiction of the US Coast Guard not the FERC. The US Coast Guard is less bureaucratic and more efficient than the FERC generally, approving LNG project applications in one year, while it usually takes the FERC 18 months or more to approve an onshore facility. Offshore receiving technologies can be defined by the following categories: Offshore gravity based structures (GBS) - A GBS LNG import terminal consists of concrete or steel caissons located on the seabed. This type of installation is totally selfsupporting with respect to its operation, utilities and power generation; Platform based import terminals The utilization of existing oil and gas platform structures, converting them to accommodate LNG deliveries; Floating storage regas units (FSRU) An LNG import terminal concept consists of a purpose built, permanently moored steel structure with LNG carriers shuttling between an export facility and the import site; and Regasification vessels - A standard LNG carrier modified in order to enable the vessel to discharge regasified LNG to a subsea pipeline, through an internal turret arrangement connected to an offshore mooring buoy. Each of these offshore regasification technologies have their own specific merits and disadvantages and their use will be highly dependent on various environmental factors, such as water depth and other logistics. Utilis Energy, Published 02/2006 Page 10

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1: Summary of offshore regas characteristics GBS Platform FSRU Regas Vessel Advantage Concrete construction Existing asset Operates at greater depth No visible fixed facility Disadvantage Shallow Depth operation No storage Loading systems/slo shing Requires specialized technology Cost $650m $400-800m $400-800m $200m Time to operation 2-3 years 1.5 years 3 years 2-2.5 years Source: Utilis Energy UTILIS ENERGY Evolving LNG market fundamentals, regulatory changes within the US government and innovative offshore regasification technologies are setting the stage for a promising future for LNG imports into the United States. These imports will play a significant role in helping the US greater diversify its sources of global energy supply. This study explores the development of the US LNG market and its increasingly important role for America s energy security. The study also considers other issues and provides a detailed evaluation of new offshore regas technologies. Utilis Energy, Published 02/2006 Page 11

Report Fax Order Form I would like to purchase copy(ies) of : Market and offshore regasification technology review at US $495 per copy. (Please indicate whether you would like a printable pdf or hard copy of the publication as appropriate) Electronic delivery ( printable pdf) Hard copy Please add $50 domestic or $70 international to cover hard copy shipping Corporate license available for US $995 Please call for more details TOTAL TO BE BILLED TO CREDIT CARD :US$ Purchaser Information: Name: Title: Company: Address: tel: email: fax: Signature: Credit Card (Visa / MC ): Exp. Number: Ple t 1 www.utilisenergy.com Utilis Energy USA 85 Eighth Avenue Suite 6H New York, NY 10011 USA f: +1 413-604-5615 e: info@utilisenergy.com Utilis Energy Europe 38 Houndsditch London, EC3A 7DB United Kingdom f: +1 413-604-5615 e: info@utilisenergy.com