The Snapshot CONODOGUINET CREEK WATERSHED SNAPSHOT

Similar documents
Acidity and Alkalinity:

Eutrophication: Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek

Results from the 2017 Water Quality Monitoring Program

Santa Rosa Creek Water Quality Results 2004

Fact Sheet. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

Water Monitoring in Spa Creek: A Summary

Maitland Valley WATERSHED

Pennsylvania Pequea and Mill Creek Watershed Section 319 National Monitoring Program Project

Pennsylvania Senior Environment Corps. Table of Contents Part 2 Getting Started:. 21 Chemical Analysis... 22

Water Quality indicators and How Human Activities Affect Water Quality

Understanding Nutrients and Their Affects on the Environment

Grants Pass Water Quality Monitoring

Lake Washington. Water Quality Assessment Report. Copyright 2012 PLM Lake & Land Management Corp.

PINEY RUN WATERSHED 2005 PROFILE

Long Prairie River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) Report Summary

Aquatic Science Unit 2. Water Quality and Water Pollution

Frequently Asked Questions - Fertilizers -

Redwood Shores Lagoon November 2016 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

Redwood Shores Lagoon February 2019 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

CLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# CLMP+ Data Summary

A Claytor Nature Center Stream Monitoring Experience

Norwalk Harbor Report Card

Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Implementation Plan

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2017 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

CHAPTER 15 WATER POLLUTION. INTO THE GULF Researchers try to pin down what s choking the Gulf of Mexico

TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Ware Creek, Taskinas Creek, and Skimino Creek Bacterial Impairments (VADEQ, 2010)

Analyses for geochemical investigations traditionally report concentrations as weight per volume of the measured ions (mg/l of NO 3 , NO 2

Tioga County Conservation District Watershed Program

Bear Creek/Bear Lake Upper Watershed Information and Education Plan

CREEKS OF THE MIDDLE FOX RIVER 2016 Progress Report

Ecosystems: Nutrient Cycles

Basics of Water Quality Sheila Murphy


Biology. Slide 1 of 33. End Show. Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

Big Chetac and the Red Cedar River Watershed. Dan Zerr University of Wisconsin-Extension Natural Resource Educator

Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution

Redwood Shores Lagoon August Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration

Biology. Slide 1 of 33. End Show. Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

Jackson Lake Analysis

Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

3 3 Cycles of Matter Slide 1 of 33

Dirty Water. Adapted from: Dirty Water in Living in Water. National Aquarium in Baltimore, Grade Level: all. Duration: 1-2 class periods

Chesapeake Bay Restoration -- Phase III JULY 13, 2018

Interpreting Lake Data

Water Quality Assessment in the Thames River Watershed

4. What is Item A called? a. Eckman dredge b. Secchi disk c. Van Dorn sampler d. Ponar sampler

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/11/2018. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

REPORT. Report No: 2013/0958 Prepared For: Natural Resources Committee Prepared By: Dean Olsen, Environmental Resource Scientist Date: 11 July 2013

CBF Water Quality Interactive Map

3 3 Cycles of Matter

QUICK FACTS. Stream Miles: Impaired Stream Miles: 0. DEP Listed Impairments: None. Watershed Municipalities:

3 3 Cycles of Matter. EOC Review

Ellen Bailey. UWW Educator training January 13,

The Status of Pompeston Creek, : From Data to Action. Pompeston Creek Watershed Association

Lesson Overview. Cycles of Matter. Lesson Overview. 3.4 Cycles of Matter

10/17/ Cycles of Matter. Recycling in the Biosphere. How does matter move among the living and nonliving parts of an ecosystem?

Gray s Creek. Gray s Creek

Jean Unmuth Wisconsin DNR

Cycles of Ma,er. Lesson Overview. Lesson Overview. 3.4 Cycles of Matter

INVESTIGATING WATERSHEDS

Interpreting Lake Data

Sugar Creek Watershed Watershed Number:

Water Resources/Water Quality

Nutrients and Water Quality in the East Souris River Watershed

Pollutant Types and Sources

Chapter 2: Conditions in the Spring Lake Watershed related to Stormwater Pollution

Portage Lake CASS COUNTY

TAPPAN LAKE 9/30/2014 RAPID WATERSHED INVENTORY INTRODUCTION

CLMP+ Report on Fleming Lake (Aitkin County)

HARPETH RIVER MAIN STEM DISSOLVED OXYGEN STUDY

CBP Implementation Plan

City of Texarkana, Arkansas. Storm Water Pollution

Little Bay Water Quality Report Card Spring 2014

Know What You re Monitoring! Since not all of us are water chemists, here is a brief understanding of what your different tools measure

West Souris River Technical Water Quality Report Summary

How Ecosystems Work Section 2. Chapter 5 How Ecosystems Work Section 2: Cycling of Materials DAY 1

Fact Sheet. Pennsylvania s Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy Goals for Nutrient and Sediment Reduction and Habitat Restoration

Wisconsin River. Hardest Working River In the Nation

TORCH LAKE TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Reporting Period: 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010. Understanding the Level 2 Stream Monitoring Data Report

Ploof s Creek South. Johannes Creek. Grand Lake, Ploof s Creek South, Johannes Creek. Introduction

Reporting Period: 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008. Understanding the Level 2 Stream Monitoring Data Report

Starting Your Own Water Monitoring Program

Water Quality Assessment for the Town of Caswell Beach, 2008

Section 319 Incremental Project Proposal for Elks Run Watershed West Virginia Stream Code:WVP-1

The Hypoxic Zone in the Gulf of Mexico

Resource. ph must be measured in the field. The ph will change if the water is collected and stored, and will not reflect the true value at the site.

ELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Reporting Period: 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008. Understanding the Level 2 Stream Monitoring Data Report

Anthropogenic Impacts on Bays and Watersheds. HI-MOES Presentation 2009 The Kohala Center Kohala Watershed Partnership

PROTECTING OUR WATERWAYS: STORMWATER POLLUTION REDUCTION EFFORTS

Reservoir age, increasing human population,

Fishing and Boating: Past, Present, and Restoration Thoughts

Scientific overview: Water quality functions of coastal buffers

The Importance of Riparian Forests

Analysis of Chlorophyll-a and other data collected in the Illinois River Watershed from

Transcription:

CONODOGUINET CREEK WATERSHED SNAPSHOT ABOVE: CONODOGUINET CREEK AT RT 74 BRIDGE FACING DOWNSTREAM The Snapshot The Conodoguinet Watershed Snapshot was a collaborative effort to engage local citizens in collecting water quality data to analyze the current health of the Conodoguinet Creek and its tributaries. It was the first watershed-wide water monitoring program to collect these data in twelve years! The Cumberland County Conservation District (CCCD) partnered with the Alliance for Aquatic Resource Monitoring (ALLARM) at Dickinson College to lead four seasonal monitoring events. Local partners included the Big Spring Watershed Association, Conodoguinet Creek Watershed Association, and Middle Spring Watershed Association. Further goals of the Snapshot included educating the public on topics related to watershed protection and non-point source pollution, providing hands-on experiences for volunteers in the field and in the lab, and sharing data with local groups and interested community members. Volunteers collected water samples and measured temperature and conductivity in the stream, then brought their samples to ALLARM s Community Aquatic Research Laboratory to measure nitratenitrogen, orthophosphate, and ph. Volunteers also visited educational booths provided by ALLARM student Watershed Coordinators, Cumberland County Conservation District, and Conodoguinet Creek Watershed Association. The four seasonal events occurred on July 8th, September 30th, December 2nd (2017), and March 3rd (2018). Between 20 and 29 sites were monitored during each event, by 30 35 volunteers. The Snapshot was ALLARM s second local partnership through its Environmental Protection Agencyfunded Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative, a six-year grant to help promote community based monitoring and integrate data into understanding the health of the Chesapeake Bay watershed. The PA Department of Environmental Protection provided support under Section 319 of the Clean Water Act (administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.) Parameters Read about the water quality parameters measured and how they relate to stream health. Page 2 Above and below: ALLARM student Watershed Coordinators help volunteers measure and interpret their sampling results. Results and Conclusions Check out the figures, maps, and conclusions from the four Snapshot events. Page 3

Parameters Reference map of the Conodoguinet Creek Watershed. TEMPERATURE Temperature is the amount of heat present in water, which controls the amount of oxygen it can hold. Cold water retains more dissolved oxygen (DO), and is usually found at greater depths. DO is very important for fish and benthic macroinvertebrates. Warm water is found closer to the surface and increases the rate of algal growth, aquatic plants, photosynthesis, and respiration. Aquatic organisms, like trout or catfish, prefer specific temperature ranges. Higher water temperatures promote bacterial growth and disease. Shoreline vegetation helps to cool water temperatures. Sources that affect temperature include: Urban/suburban stormwater runoff Exposure to sunlight/presence of shade Soil erosion/turbidity Insufficient cooling towers at plants 2 ph ph is the measure of water acidity, valued on a scale of 1-14. As ph increases, acidity decreases. ph levels at either extreme create an inhospitable environment for most aquatic plants and organisms. Most natural waters have a range of 4.0-9.0. Presence of limestone in bedrock makes most waters more basic. Sources that affect ph include: Acid rain deposition Acid or alkaline waste industrial processes CONDUCTIVITY Conductivity is the measure of the ability of water to pass an electrical current. It is affected by the amount of inorganic dissolved solids that carry a charge (ions) like nitrates, phosphates, sodium, calcium, iron, etc. Inorganic compounds can be used to trace spills of certain materials, but not oil-based or organic compounds. Organic substances do not conduct electricity well. Higher water temperatures tend to have higher conductivity. Distilled water conductivity ranges from 0.5-3 µs/cm, whereas some industrial waters have levels of 10,000 µs/cm. Sources that affect conductivity include: Geology of the area Failing sewage system/wastewater treatment plants Agricultural runoff Road salts Industrial discharge NITRATE Nitrate is the most abundant, inorganic form of nitrogen (NO3). It is an essential Volunteers prepare samples for nutrient and ph analysis in the ALLARM lab.

3 nutrient required by all organisms for building proteins. High levels of nitrate can lead to decreased plant and fish diversity, eutrophication, and algal blooms. Nitrate is a large contributor to nutrient pollution in waterways in agriculture-dominated areas or near sewage treatment plants. Sources that affect nitrogen include: Fertilizer runoff from lawns and croplands Runoff from livestock feeding and manure storages Sewage treatment plants and on-site septic systems ORTHOPHOSPHATE Orthophosphate is the reactive form of phosphate (PO4) created by bacteria and used by plants. Typical water quality standards report total phosphorus, which includes orthophosphates. An excess of orthophosphates can also lead to eutrophication and algal blooms. Unlike nitrogen, phosphorus is more commonly found attached to sediment and not dissolved in the water column. Most sewage treatment plants have total phosphorus standards of 1-2 mg/l. Sources that affect phosphorus include: Soil and rocks Fertilizer runoff from lawns and croplands Runoff from livestock feeding and manure storage areas Sewage treatment plants and on-site septic systems Soaps and other personal care products Watershed Context The Conodoguinet Creek watershed drains more than 500 square miles of the Cumberland Valley. The headwaters begin in Horse Valley, next to the Kittatinny Range. The creek winds through the northern part of Cumberland County until it meets the Susquehanna River. The main-stem of the Conodoguinet Creek is approximately 90 miles long, and the watershed contains more than 680 small streams! GEOLOGY The Conodoguinet Creek has two major types of bedrock. To the north of the creek is primarily shale. To the south of the creek is primarily limestone. See the temperature or ph maps as a reference. Limestone is included in the Carbonate geology category on the map (light blue). Limestone plays an important role in affecting the water chemistry of streams. Components of carbonate rocks work to keep the ph of the stream from changing too much and becoming more acidic. This capability means limestone streams are often more basic in ph, and cooler in temperature all year, with few changes. The two geologies also exhibit large differences in runoff potential. Water is not able to penetrate through shale, so it runs off of the soil in these areas more frequently in larger amounts. In limestone regions, water can flow down into the rock layer and below, so there is generally less runoff from the land. LAND USE There are many land uses throughout the Conodoguinet Creek watershed. Common types include forests, agricultural fields and pasture, and developed rural, suburban, and urban landscapes. See the nitrate, orthophosphate, or conductivity results maps below as a reference. DID YOU KNOW? Conodoguinet means A Long Way with Many Bends in a Native American language.

4 Results Data interpretation splits the results into three categories based on geography and provides comparisons to streams with similar geological backgrounds. The resulting conclusions are based on average values from sites that were sampled 2-4 times during the year. It should be noted that heavy rain events occurred before the summer (July) and spring (March) Snapshots, thus potentially diluting concentrations of various parameters for each of those events. Certain sites were also not accessible in the winter Snapshot due to open hunting season. Site 1 was located in Franklin County, all others sites were within Cumberland County. 10 sites were selected from southern tributaries and 5 sites were in northern tributaries. The main-stem of the Conodoguinet had 14 sites at different reaches of the creek. In general, the northern tributary sites held the lowest average conductivity, nitrate, orthophosphate, and ph values of the Snapshot. The temperature average was higher than that of the southern tributaries. Sites in the southern tributaries displayed the highest average conductivity, nitrate, and orthophosphate values. The ph average was almost equal to the mainstem. The temperature average was the lowest of the three geographies. The main-stem of the Conodoguinet was notably higher in temperature than the northern or southern tributes. It had an equally high ph average as the southern tributaries. The downstream portion of the main-stem Conodoguinet showed increasing trends in all parameters. None of the average temperature or ph results occurred outside of the water quality standard ranges set by the PA Code. Conductivity, nitrate, and orthophosphate results were also within ideal ranges. Examining the results per site location would provide a more detailed picture of watershed health than a general geographical comparison. More frequent sampling would provide a better idea of individual stream and whole watershed health. General Conclusions by Geography Temperature ( F) Average Water Temperature 55.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 51.0 50.0 51.2 53.1 54.4 ph (standard units) 7.7 7.6 7.5 7.4 7.3 7.2 Average ph per Location 7.6 7.4 7.6 Average Conductivity Average Orthophosphate Conductivity (μs/cm) 800 600 400 200 0 583 287 344 Orthophosphate (PO4)(mg/L) 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.19 0.14 0.15 Average Nitrate SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS: Nitrate (NO3-N) (mg/l) 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 1.1 1.8 : Highest conductivity, nitrate, phosphate, and ph values. Lowest temperature values : Lowest conductivity, nitrate, phosphate, and ph values Main-stem: Highest temperature and ph values. All five parameters increased from the upstream to the downstream section of the creek.

Individual Site Results Note: Temperature results only include the sites that were sampled all 4 times, to avoid skewed averages based on larger seasonal differences. 5

6

7 Conclusions Different types of land use can lead to various pollutants finding their way into waterways in the form of non-point source pollution. Their origin cannot be traced to one drain or pipe. Examples include nitrogen from fertilizers or phosphate from septic systems. Excess sediment from erosion is a large challenge to water quality. Temperatures in waterways increase from the heat generated from streets, roofs, and parking lots, so stormwater pollution is also a continuous issue for developed areas. Therefore, more developed and agricultural lands tend to add larger amounts of pollutant-heavy runoff into small streams and eventually larger waterways. The results of the Snapshot are consistent with this assertion, as the southern tributaries contained the highest nutrient and conductivity levels. The less developed, more forested land surrounding the northern tributaries produced lower nutrient and conductivity results. The main-stem acted like a mixing pot of these various inputs, but showed increasing trends in all five parameters downstream where development is much more prevalent. Identifying these pollutant patterns can lead to the installation of best management practices such as rain barrels, rain gardens, riparian buffer zones, and infiltration areas. These areas capture some of the pollutants, naturally treat runoff, and help to reduce human impacts. Remember, we all live downstream! FUNDING Funding and other support for this project was provided by: Alliance for Aquatic Resource Monitoring (ALLARM) at Dickinson College Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative Cumberland County Conservation District Pennsylvania Association of Conservation Districts Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection United States Environmental Protection Agency PARTNERS Additional partners of the Snapshot included: Big Spring Watershed Association Conodoguinet Creek Watershed Association Middle Spring Watershed Association

Thank you to all the volunteers and staff who were essential to making the Snapshot a success!