Project Summary. Project Objectives

Similar documents
The Role of Transportation Systems Management & Operations in Supporting Livability and Sustainability

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

Minnesota Statewide Freight System Plan Action Agenda Development Lead Agency (MnDOT or

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. RTPAC #1 January 18, 2018

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting November 15, 2012

Federal Highway Administration Cooperative Automated Vehicle (CAV) Update

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Regular Meeting

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 945

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

TCATS October 12-Michigan Works 5:30-7pm. NATS October 19-Niles District Library 6-7:30pm

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Riverview Corridor Pre-Project Development Study

VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

FY 2019 Unified Planning Work Program FINAL. Regional Intergovernmental Council. June 14, Kanawha Putnam Metropolitan Planning Organization

Moving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

THE REGION S PLAN POLICY FRAMEWORK. August 2015

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

The Consultant (team) will be required to have knowledge and expertise in the following areas:

Public Input from Regional Visioning Forums

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

CHAPTER 3 THE BUILDING BLOCKS POLICIES AND SUPPORTIVE STRATEGIES REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

WTP 2035 DRAFT STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

Effective Transportation Demand Management (TDM) in Congested Corridors US 422 TDM Best Practices Policy Brief and Recommendations

Addendum 1: Performance Measures

Chapter 5 - Transportation

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

Niagara s Transportation Strategy 1. Introduction:

ONE NEVADA TRANSPORTATION PLAN The Nevada Department of Transportation s Long-Range Transportation Plan

Advancing Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) in Rural Areas

2018 Spring AICP Exam Review. AREAS OF PRACTICE PART 2 Claudia M. Bilotto, AICP

Congestion Management Process (CMP)

2017 Spring AICP Exam Review. AREAS OF PRACTICE PART 2 Jamie Cochran, FAICP Georgia Department of Transportation

APA Policy Principles for Autonomous Vehicles

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

ROCOG TRANSPORTATION PLANNING WORK PROGRAM

To provide an update on the progress of the Peel Goods Movement Task Force and the Peel Goods Movement Strategic Plan.

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017

Chapter 2 Transportation Policy Plan Strategies

Transportation Master Plan Introduction

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

MAP-21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Creates jobs and supports economic growth

INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

WTP Phase 2 Implementation & Freight System Plan

When considering transportation planning:

Grottoes. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

Chapter 14 Work Program

3.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS STUDIES

Vermont State Standards and Complete Streets

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

Return on Investment for State Highway Projects. 25 th Annual Transportation Research Conference May 22, 2014

Transforming the SFMTA SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

2040 STRATEGIC PLAN. January we move people

2. Goals and Objectives

Dear Board of County Commissioners, Mayor Flitner, and Town Councilors,

CHAPTER 5. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Transportation Goals & Objectives

Washington State Association of Counties. County Overview: WTP Advisory Committee County Transportation Overview

Appendix F: Scenario Planning

Transportation Advisory Board May 21, 2014

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings February 2016

INTEGRATED MOBILITY PLAN

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018

Envisioning the Future: A History of Regional Planning Initiatives, Studies, and Plans

DIVERSIFIED RURAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE DIVERSIFIED RURAL ALL COMMUNITIES

14.0 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE COMPLIANCE

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

New Mexico Statewide Model

Appendix O Level of Service Standard and Measurements

Creating Safe, Sustainable, Multi-Modal Urban Transportation

RESOLUTION NO

Technical Memorandum#1A

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies

2018 Comprehensive Guide Plan Steering Committee. Wednesday, October 11, Minnehaha Room, Minnetonka City Hall. 6:00 8:00 p.m.

LAND USE POLICIES BY COMMUNITY DESIGNATION

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Purpose of the Countywide Transportation Plan SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

FTP Implementation Element Worksheet

Congestion Management Strategy

Improving multimodal mobility for better economic, health and environmental outcomes

URBAN CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES URBAN CENTER

MEETING SUMMARY FOR APRIL 13, 2017

Regional Transit System Plan

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN DEVELOPMENT

Transportation Spending and Job Creation. February 2011

Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Metropolitan Council PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN. for Transportation Planning and Programming

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

Florida Transportation Plan and Strategic Intermodal System Policy Plan Regional Workshop

RTC Mobility Plan Workshop. North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015

Transcription:

M2D2 Multi Modal Development and Delivery A project to support Michigan s economic recovery by improving MDOT s institutional capacity to plan, design, construct, operate and maintain Michigan s transportation system for Complete Streets and multiple modes Project Summary Rebuilding our economy and creating new jobs is the most important issue of our generation. Thriving local economies need access to workers, to materials, and to markets. Transportation investment is key to economic recovery and prosperity, and Michigan has much to gain by creating communities that attract and retain people and attract and retain jobs. The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) mission is providing the highest quality integrated transportation services for economic benefit and improved quality of life. To carry out its mission in the context of 21 st Century economic and demographic reality, MDOT recognizes that its standards and approaches for planning, designing, constructing, maintaining and operating trunk line highway facilities need to be updated to consider the impacts and interactions of all potential modes of travel (automobile, transit, bicycle, pedestrian, truck, rail, etc.) from a capital investment, physical construction, and operational perspective. MDOT staff need to have the knowledge and tools available to them to effectively plan, design, construct, maintain and operate facilities that move people and goods in the variety of ways that people and communities chose to utilize. To address this compelling need, MDOT and Smart Growth America (SGA) propose to partner to explore the needs and expectations for each transportation mode and identify ways MDOT can balance those needs and modes collectively when multiple modes coexist. A series of workshops would lead to systematic revisions to MDOT procedures, practices, standards, guidance documents and manuals, as well as recommendations for ongoing training and development activities for MDOT staff to understand and utilize the revised practices. Project Objectives 1. Create an MDOT staff project stakeholder group (PSG) with a state-of-the practice understanding of the capabilities and requirements of each transportation mode and the opportunities and tradeoffs that exist in a multimodal environment. 2. Work with the PSG to understand barriers, gaps, and opportunities that exist in current MDOT practices, standards and guidance to address the needs of all modes in a variety of contexts: urban core, suburban, small urban, and rural; arterials and limited access/freeway. Set in place a process to modify and/or augment practices, standards, and guidance as appropriate. Page 1 of 5

3. Implement new practices, standards and guidance through a training program for MDOT staff, the staff of partner agencies in regional and local government, and design professionals in the private sector. 4. Communicate new MDOT practices to other state agencies, regional and local government, the business community, advocacy groups, and the traveling public. Background MDOT trunk line standards for planning, design and operations have historically centered around the provision of facilities that allow for the safe and efficient travel of motor vehicles (cars and trucks) and are based on the performance of those vehicles and the behavior patterns, expectations and needs of the operators of vehicles. These standards have evolved over time to provide more consideration for other surface transportation modes in some instances, but do not necessarily fully consider the co-operation of these modes in the same space, or how the modes need to interface at the human dimension to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people between the modes within the same space. At times, various modes have competing needs within the same space, and MDOT guidance and standards offer little clarification as to how to resolve these conflicts effectively or how to prioritize which needs are most critical for a given situation. Several policy and practical developments are converging in recent times that require a fresh look at MDOT standards for planning, designing and operating facilities in a comprehensive way to consider all modes and how state trunk line facilities make possible their safe and efficient operation within MDOT rights of way: The establishment of Complete Streets policies at both the state and local levels. The development of light rail, streetcar and bus rapid transit systems The increased utilization of bicycles for non-recreational transport and the establishment for formal green ways, bike lanes, bike sharing services, regional and statewide trail systems and national bike route designations. The emphasis on placemaking, transit oriented development and other land use changes to reflect demographic trends toward more urbanized living preferences of the population. The emergence of new technologies to provide traveler information for all modes. The development of advance freight logistics methodologies. The emergence and development of autonomous or driverless vehicles. Furthermore, state trunk lines tend to be the main streets and arteries of Michigan communities, connecting centers of economic and quality of life activities, as well as often being the host to many adjacent economic and commercial activities. They are inherently the focus of attention for the movement of people, the areas desired by people for multimodal access, and the areas where mode transfer need to occur for a seamless transportation experience to exist. Page 2 of 5

Work Plan 1. Scoping and background information Meet with lead agency staff to review and refine scope of work. Meet with Sense of Place Council to review and refine scope of work. Convene an MDOT project stakeholders group (PSG), including representatives of: o Project planning and community outreach o Traffic estimation and forecasting o Internal mode specific experts o Traffic engineering o Traffic operations o Road design o Bridge design o Maintenance operations o Federal Highway Administration o Federal Transit Administration o Federal Railroad Administration o Others as identified by lead agency staff Recruit and convene a Curriculum Review Committee (CRC) of recognized modal experts from Michigan and other states to advise on the content of the training program. These experts may come from other DOTs, transit agencies, academia, not-for-profits organizations, etc. Collect background information related to existing training opportunities (National Highway Institute, National Transit Institute, American Public Transit Association, National Complete Streets Coalition, ITS America, etc.) o Analyze relevance for this program o Determine permissions required to use material With the PSG and CRC, review existing training and identify any additional training modules required. Create an initial list of existing MDOT practices, standards and guidance that may be subject to revision. Identify any FHWA and/or FTA rules, practices, standards and guidance that may need revision. Review list of MDOT/FHWA/FTA practices, standards and guidance with PSG and revise as appropriate. Update Sense of Place Council. Page 3 of 5

2. Develop Multimodal Workshop Curriculum Create outlines for each mode and for multimodal integration module. Modes will likely include: o Public Transportation o Bicycling o Walking o Intelligent Transportation Systems o Transportation Demand Management o Freight Logistics o Multimodal Integration Review outlines with CRC and PSG. Develop course curriculum and materials including presentations and interactive exercises. Review curriculum and materials with CRC and modify as appropriate. Update Sense of Place Council. 3. Conduct Workshops with PSG Schedule and conduct full-day workshops on each mode. Schedule and conduct a two-day multimodal integration workshop. Compile recommendations from each workshop in a next steps memorandum. Review memorandum with PSG and revise as appropriate. Update Sense of Place Council. 4. Modify and/or augment practices, standards, and guidance in response to workshop findings Review list of practices, standards, and guidance developed in Task 1 and revise/augment as appropriate based upon input from the workshops. Draft work plan for revision. Identify any FHWA and/or FTA practices, standards and guidance that may need clarification/revision in order to implement MDOT work plan. Initiate discussion with FHWA and FTA staff as appropriate. Review work plan with PSG and CRC and revise as appropriate. Review work plan with MDOT management and revise as appropriate. Update Sense of Place Council. MDOT implements work plan. 5. Communicate changes to MDOT staff, partners and customers Draft a communications and training plan for engaging MDOT staff, partners and customers in developing and implementing revised practices, standards, and guidance. Review communications and training plan with PSG and modify as appropriate Page 4 of 5

Review communications and training plan with MDOT management and revise as appropriate MDOT implements communications and training plan Demonstration Project Deliverables Documentation of PSG and CRC meetings Draft and final curriculum Draft and final workshop documentation Draft and final work plan for revision/augmentation of MDOT/FHWA/FTA standards, practices and guidance Draft and final communications and training plan Technical support for this demonstration project is being provided by Smart Growth America through a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. Smart Growth America is the only national organization dedicated to researching, advocating for and leading coalitions to bring smart growth practices to more communities nationwide. From providing more sidewalks to ensuring more homes are built near public transportation or that productive farms remain a part of our communities, smart growth helps make sure people across the nation can live in great neighborhoods. For additional information visit www.smartgrowthamerica.org. Page 5 of 5