Structural Design Challenges of Merdeka PNB118, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Similar documents
CCTV Headquarters Case Study. ARCH 631 Haowei Cheng, Peixin Dong, Xiaoying He, Zepeng Jia, Dongqi Zhu

Council on Tall Buildings

Council on Tall Buildings. and Urban Habitat

CCTV HEADQUARTERS. ARCH 631 Spring 2018 Daniel Edith Mckenzie Rafael

Seismic Behaviour of RC Shear Walls

BOAST. West Coast. Set to open this spring, the tallest building on the West Coast resists wind and seismic drifts with massive braces.

Challenges and Opportunities for the Structural Design of the Jamsil Lotte World Tower

Structural Performance Assessment and Control of Super Tall Buildings During Construction

CTBUH Technical Paper

Steel This Book BY EDWARD J. ROBERTS, PE

Council on Tall Buildings. and Urban Habitat CAYAN TOWER CTBUH BEST TALL BUILDING MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA

Tall Building Design Innovations in Australia

Marina Bay Sands Hotel Arch 631 Kayla Brittany Maria Michelle

Technical Specification for Concrete Structures of Tall Building

Seismic Performance of Residential Buildings with Staggered Walls

PEER Tall Building Seismic Design Guidelines

ctbuh.org/papers The Bow: Unique Diagrid Structural System for a Sustainable Tall Building Title:

January 14, 2006 Structural Thesis Proposal: Structural and Breadth Redesign Options

CHAPTER 10: GENERAL STRUCTURAL DETAILS

Structural Design of Super High Rise Buildings in High Seismic Intensity Area

Multi-storey buildings

Engr. Thaung Htut Aung M. Eng. Asian Institute of Technology Deputy Project Director, AIT Consulting

PAT Construction Technology of High rise Building. Lateral System: Steel Building

one structural behavior and design ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2016 lecture

Danielle Shetler - Structural option Courtyard by Marriott Lancaster, PA

5-story Residential Building

one structural behavior, systems, and design ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2015 lecture

one structural behavior, systems and design Course Description Course Description Syllabus & Student Understandings statics mechanics of materials

Anchor bolts ASTM F1554, Gr. 36 Wide flange beams ASTM A992, Fy = 50 ksi Misc. structural steel ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi

Pioneering China s Tallest: Form and Structure of the Ping An Finance Ce nter

Structural System of North-East Asia Trade Tower in Korea

STUDY ON TALL BUILDING STRUCTURE ANALYSIS

Outrigger Structural System A Review and Comparison of the Structural System

MahaNakhon Tower History of a Design & Build. Dr. Kanokpat Chanvaivit, Senior Design Manger, Bouygues-Thai Ltd.

LEGAL. Lessons BY JEFF THOMPSON, P.E., AND ERIKA YARONI

Newfoundland at Canary Wharf

Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design

Session 5: Precast Concrete Floors. Rick Henry Courtesy of University of Auckland, Faculty of Engineering

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS. By Ir. Heng Tang Hai

Types Of Roofs - Vault

TECHNICAL REPORT 1. Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions. Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital. Hershey, Pennsylvania

Distribution of Forces in Lateral Load Resisting Systems

Council on Tall Buildings. and Urban Habitat BACKGROUND SECTION STEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALL STEEL PLATE COMPOSITE SHEAR WALL

181 Fremont San Francisco, California

181 Fremont San Francisco, CA. Proposal 12/12/2014. Caroline Klatman Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby

Frontiers in High-Rise Outrigger Design

Comparison of shear lag in structural steel building with framed tube and braced tube

Office Building-G. Thesis Proposal. Carl Hubben. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari

National Truss for Historic Preservation

Joint Design of Precast Concrete Moment Frame using Hollow Precast Concrete Column Soo-Yeon Seo, Tae-Wan Kim, Jong-Wook Lim, Jae-Yup Kim

Central Park Mixed-Use Building in Jakarta

Construction of the Manulife Tower Redevelopment of the previous Lee Gardens Hotel in Causeway Bay

181 Fremont San Francisco, CA. Tech Report 1 9/12/2014. Caroline Klatman Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby

CVEN 483. Structural System Overview

ctbuh.org/papers Application of Seismic Isolation Systems In Japanese High-Rise Buildings Title:

Addendum 1 Resort Lifestyle Communities- Office Addition

SEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE

Taking It to the Limit BY JOHN ROACH, PE, AND JOHN BOEKELMAN, SE, PE, RA CannonDesign

Developments of Structural Systems Toward Mile-High Towers

Asia & Australasia: A Selection of Written Works on the World's Tall Building Forefront

H y a t t C e n t e r Chicago, Illinois (71 South Wacker Drive) Structural Redesign

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Schöck Isokorb Type CV

Thesis Proposal. Nasser Marafi. Center & Facility Service Building. St. Joseph Hospital of Orange Patient Care. Proposal

CTBUH Technical Paper

The Structural Redesign of Boyds Bear Country and its Related Systems. Boyds Bear Country, Pigeon Forge, Tennessee

A Challenging Journey for the Third CTF Finance Centre. Derry Yu De Ming, Project Director, New World China Land

Comparative Evaluation of Structural Systems for Tall Buildings: Diagrids vs. Outrigger Structures

Prepared by Elie F. Issa, Eng. D.E.C. August 2016

Building in Beijing. Steel provides the support for two new high-profile atriums in China s capital.

S T R U C T U R. In the Eye of Ivan. The amount of confidence he has in what he has calculated, magazine

STRENGTH AND DUCTILITY OF RETROFITTED R/C BUILDING BY MULTI-STORY STEEL-BRACED FRAME SUBJECTED TO TRI-LATERAL EARTHQUAKE LOADING

The construction technology of Chongqing Chaotianmen Bridge

2. Outline of the bridge 3-span continuous deck extradosed bridge Bridge length

"Impact of New IS 1893 & Related Codes on Design of tall Buildings, Including Trend Setting Structures

PARAMETRIC STUDY OF DIAGRID, PENTAGRID AND HEXAGRID STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

Adichunchanagiri Institute of Technology, Chikkamagaluru, India

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

Design Requirements of Buildings and Good Construction Practices in Seismic Zone

midas Gen Advanced Webinar on Construction Stage Analysis with Special Emphasis on Column Shortening

INSTRUCTOR: ANNE NICHOLS

Institude of Ningbo Urban Construction Design and Research, Zhejiang, China,

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

Precision HSS Connection System For Modular Buildings. Entire contents protected by Copyright. US and International Patents Pending

OCTAGONAL SHAPE REDUCES AIRPLANE HANGAR COSTS

Integrated Optimal Life Cycle Design of Super Tall Buildings with Viscous Dampers

Experimental study on the seismic performance of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed floor units.

Site Analysis. Site Conditions: Seismic Challenges Strong Winds Average Temperature 69. San Francisco

Damage capacity of the ground motions of the Dec. 1, Alaska. Earthquake

The designer shall also submit additional information required by the University as described and underlined below.

THE APPLICATION OF RESPONSE CONTROL DESIGN USING MIDDLE-STORY ISOLATION SYSTEM TO HIGH-RISE BUILDING

Seismic Design of Cast-in-Place Concrete Diaphragms, Chords and Collectors

Structural Breadth. Landmark Façade

MID-STORY SEISMIC ISOLATION FOR STRENGTHENING OF A MULTI-STORY BUILDING

STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF COMPOSITE SUPER-COLUMNS FOR THE TAIPEI 101 TOWER

Whose responsibility is it? Design Responsibility. Steel Joist Institute. Standard Assumptions. Common Pitfalls in Steel Joist Specification

Axial Load Behaviors of PSRC Composite Columns with Anchor-Type Transverse Reinforcements

Steel Expansion. Located along the Grand River in

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS

Transcription:

Structural Design Challenges of Merdeka PNB118, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia SawTeen See, Managing Partner, Leslie E. Robertson Associates Simon Cloherty, Principal, Robert Bird Group

MERDEKA PNB118 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM SCHEMATIC DESIGN & DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LESLIE E. ROBERTSON ASSOCIATES, R.L.L.P. and ROBERT BIRD GROUP Developer: PNB MERDEKA VENTURES SDN. BHD. Architect: FENDER KATSALIDIS ARCHITECTS Project Manager: TURNER INTERNATIONAL

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT: 630 M TOP OCCUPIED FLOOR AT 500 M CONCRETE CORE CONCRETE MEGA COLUMN STEEL OUTRIGGER TRUSSES STEEL BELT TRUSSES STEEL PERIMETER COLUMNS FLOOR FRAMING: OFFICE, APARTMENT, HOTEL: STEEL INSIDE CORE: CONCRETE Fcu = 70 to 85 MPa Fcu = 70 to 85 MPa Fy = 420 MPa Fy = 415 MPa or 445 MPa Fy = 445 MPa Fy = 345 MPa Fcu = 40 MPa

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM 3 LEVELS OF OUTRIGGERS 6 SETS OF BELT TRUSSES FIN WALLS AT THE BASEMENT LEVELS CONCRETE FIN WALLS IN THE BASEMENT STEEL BELT TRUSS STEEL PERIMETER COLUMNS STEEL BLADES PERIMETER BRACING CONCRETE MEGA COLUMNS

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM CORE WALLS EMBEDDED OUTRIGGER CHORD OUTRIGGER STEEL BELT TRUSS STEEL PERIMETER COLUMNS STEEL BLADES PERIMETER BRACING CONCRETE MEGA COLUMNS

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM CORE WALLS FIN WALLS RAFT CONCRETE MEGA COLUMNS COFFERDAM WALL NOT SHOWN

STRUCTURAL CONCEPT THIS IS THE PREFERRED PRIMARY STRUCTURAL SYSTEM. THE BLADES CREATE A SERIES OF TRUSSES THAT ARE VERTICALLY ALIGNED. THIS CONFIGURATION CARRIES THE GRAVITY LOADS DOWNWARD, WITHOUT CREATING A TENDENCY FOR THE BUILDING TO LEAN EITHER TO THE LEFT OR TO THE RIGHT. A B

STRUCTURAL CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE REMAINDER OF THE FLOOR AREA, OUTLINED IN BLUE, SMALL, SLOPING, PERIMETER COLUMNS ARE ADDED. THE WEIGHT ASSOCIATED WITH THESE BLUE AREAS DOES NOT SIGNIFICANTLY CREATE A TENDENCY FOR THE BUILDING TO LEAN EITHER TO THE LEFT OR TO THE RIGHT. NOTE: IN THE CD PHASE, SOME PERIMETER COLUMNS WERE UPSIZED IN LIEU OF USING THE BLADES AS STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. THE BLADES REMAIN AS AN ARCHITECTURAL EXPRESSION A B

STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS BELT TRUSS BLADE COLUMNS PERIMETER COLUMNS MEGA COLUMNS COLUMN BELT TRUSS BLADE

LEVEL 40 MEGA COLUMN A STRUCTURAL PLAN C D SW1 NW1 SW2 NW2 MEGA COLUMN B SW4 SW3 NW3 CORE WALL NW4 NORTH SE4 NE4 OUTRIGGER SE3 SE2 NE2 NE3 BELT TRUSS SE1 B A NE1

LEVEL 40 OUTRIGGER / BELT TRUSS LEVELS BLADE CORE WALL BELT TRUSS OUTRIGGER OUTRIGGER CHORD MEGA COLUMN PERIMETER COLUMN

LEVEL 115 MEGA COLUMN A MEGA COLUMN B SW3 STRUCTURAL PLAN SW2 C SW1 D NW1 NW2 NW3 CORE WALL NW4 NORTH NE4 OUTRIGGER SE3 SE2 NE2 NE3 BELT TRUSS SE1 A NE1 B

LEVEL 115 OUTRIGGER / BELT TRUSS LEVELS BELT TRUSS MEGA COLUMN BLADE OUTRIGGER CORE WALL HAT TRUSS PERIMETER COLUMN

CREEP AND SHRINKAGE EFFECTS DEFORMED SHAPE OVER TIME FORCES ON PERIMETER COLUMN HIGH YIELD STEEL Fy = 445 MPA

BUILDING PERFORMANCE IN THE WIND

SERVICEABILITY WIND ACCELERATIONS 30 AS MEASURED AT THE SKYDECK PEAK ACCELERATION (MILLI-G) 25 20 15 10 5 ISO OFFICE ISO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE CRITERIA RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA MERDEKA PNB118 0 0.1 1 10 100 RETURN PERIOD (YEAR)

MEGA COLUMN OUTRIGGER TRUSSES CORE WALL BELT TRUSS OUTRIGGER TRUSS TOP CHORD OUTRIGGER TRUSS DIAGONAL AXIALLY LOADED FLOOR BEAMS KEY PLAN

OUTRIGGER TRUSSES OUTRIGGER TRUSS AXIALLY LOADED FLOOR BEAMS STEEL CASTING CORE WALL STEEL EMBEDDED CHORD DETAIL AREA REBARS KEY PLAN

BELT TRUSS TO MEGA COLUMN CONNECTION BELT TRUSS OUTRIGGER VERTICAL MEGA COLUMN BELT TRUSS SHEAR TRANSFER BEARING ANGLES OUTRIGGER DIAGONAL DETAIL AREA BLADE AXIALLY LOADED FLOOR BEAMS (ALB) KEY PLAN

BELT TRUSS TO MEGA COLUMN CONNECTION BELT TRUSS OUTRIGGER DIAGONAL ALB OUTRIGGER CHORD DETAIL AREA MEGA COLUMN BELT TRUSS KEY PLAN

MEGA-COLUMN CONCEPT STUDIES OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C OPTION D SELECTED LATER DEVELOPED WITH D40 BARS & Fcu = 85MPa

MEGA COLUMN D40 BUNDLE WITH STAGGERED SPLICES LD MIN TIE EACH BUNDLE D35 BARS IN PRE-ASSEMBLED REBAR CAGES BOND LENGTH ALIGNMENT SLEEVE BAR BUNDLE D40 SAW-CUT BARS FOR FULL BEARING APPROX. 4.0% REINF RATIO SHOWN

SEISMICITY COMPARISON ASIA SEISMIC HAZARD MAP KUALA LUMPUR SEOUL SHANGHAI TAIPEI TOKYO PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION 475 YEAR RETURN PERIOD SOURCE: GLOBAL SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

700 COMPARISON EARTHQUAKE / WIND ELEVATION (M) 600 500 400 300 200 100 DESIGN EARTHQUAKE DESIGN (ULTIMATE) WIND 0-20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 FACTORED SHEAR (KN)

COMPARISON EARTHQUAKE / WIND BASE SHEAR KL EARTHQUAKE DESIGN 475 YR KUALA LUMPUR EARTHQUAKE MAX CONSIDERED EQ 2475 YR KUALA LUMPUR ULTIMATE WIND

700 COMPARISON EARTHQUAKE / WIND ELEVATION (M) 600 500 400 300 200 100 DESIGN EARTHQUAKE DESIGN (ULTIMATE) WIND 0-10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 FACTORED OVERTURNING MOMENT (KN-M)

COMPARISON EARTHQUAKE / WIND BASE MOMENT KL EQK DESIGN 475 YR KL WIND KL EQK MCE 2475 YR SEOUL DESIGN WIND (RETURN PERIOD 8000 YEARS) KUALA LUMPUR ULTIMATE WIND

WIND ENGINEERING STUDIES OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 OPTION 4

WIND ENGINEERING STUDIES

SPIRE STRUCTURE ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT STRUCTURAL CONCEPT STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION MORE EFFICIENT MEMBERS ALLOWS FOR TELESCOPING ERECTION BIRD S EYE VIEW

EL + 630 TOP SPIRE STRUCTURE TIER 6 TIER 5 TIER 4 TIER 3 TYPICAL SECTION TIER 2 EL + 500 TOP FLOOR TIER 1 BIRD S EYE VIEW

SPIRE STRUCTURE CORE WALLS AXIALLY LOADED BEAMS OUTRIGGER SPIRE SPIRE SUPPORT TRUSSES MEGA COLUMN BELT TRUSS HAT TRUSS DETAIL AREA BIRD S EYE VIEW

ATRIUM STRUCTURE BELT TRUSS BELT TRUSS ATRIUM STRUCTURE DETAIL AREA NORTH

ATRIUM STRUCTURE LEVEL 43 LEVEL 40 LEVEL 14 ATRIUM CORNER MEMBERS ROD BRACING LOCATION (TYP) BELT TRUSS OPEN ATRIUM SPACE FOR 30 + FLOORS LEVEL 08 FRONT ELEVATION SIDE

TOWER INCLINED COLUMNS APPROX. EXTENT OF TOWER CONSTRUCTION BELT TRUSS LOWER ATRIUM CORNER MEMBERS ATRIUM STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE BELT TRUSS ERECTION MAY BE SPED BY ERECTING DOWNWARDS ATRIUM HORIZONTAL MEMBERS AT EACH FLOOR APPROX. EXTENT OF TOWER CONSTRUCTION ERECTION MAY BE SPED BY ERECTING DOWNWARDS ATRIUM MEMBERS AND ROD BRACING STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4

APPROX. SIZE OF OCCUPANT ATRIUM STRUCTURE SOUTH CANOPY CANOPY STRUCTURES TOWER NORTH CANOPY NORTH

CANOPY STRUCTURES SOUTH CANOPY ATRIUM STRUCTURE TOWER NORTH CANOPY NORTH

CANOPY STRUCTURES CONNECTION TO TOWER (FOR INDEXING ONLY) TRUSS C ELEVATION TOWER ATRIUM EXTENT OUTLINE OF ARCHITECTURAL CLADDING SLOPING SUPPORT MEMBER BEYOND INTERSECTION WITH TRUSS B INTERSECTION WITH TRUSS A INTERSECTION WITH TRUSS D SLOPING SUPPORT MEMBER ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT STRUCTURAL CONCEPT

CANOPY STRUCTURES SOUTH CANOPY KEY PLAN TRUSS MEMBERS, W360 TYPICAL SHEAR WALL OR OTHER BRACED FRAME SYSTEM INTERSECTION WITH TRUSS C SLOPING SUPPORT MEMBER TRUSS S-A TRUSS S-B BRIDGING TRUSS E INTERSECTION WITH TRUSS C OUTLINE OF ARCHITECTURAL CLADDING BRIDGING TRUSS F MOMENT FRAME OVER CORRIDOR TOWER EXTENT BRIDGING TRUSS E SLOPING SUPPORT MEMBER OUTLINE OF ARCHITECTURAL CLADDING INTERSECTION WITH TRUSS A & TRUSS D BRIDGING TRUSS F TRUSS S-A ELEVATION TRUSS S-B ELEVATION

CANOPY STRUCTURES TRUSS N-A TRUSS N-B TRUSS MEMBERS, W360 TYPICAL SHEAR WALL OR OTHER BRACED FRAME SYSTEM INTERSECTION OF TRUSS B NORTH CANOPY KEY PLAN OUTLINE OF ARCHITECTURAL CLADDING SLOPING SUPPORT MEMBER BRIDGING TRUSS E BRACED FRAME TOWER EXTENT BRIDGING TRUSS E INTERSECTION OF TRUSS D INTSERECTION OF TRUSS B (OPPOSITE SIDE) INTERSECTION OF TRUSS A SLOPING SUPPORT MEMBERS INTERSECTION OF TRUSS C TRUSS N-A ELEVATION TRUSS N-B ELEVATION

CANOPY STRUCTURES ELEVATION DETAIL AREA INTSERECTION OF TRUSS B (OPPOSITE SIDE) SLOPING SUPPORT MEMBERS PLAN 3D NODE VIEW TRUSS N-B ELEVATION

- PILING, COFFERDAM & RAFT COMPLETE - SUPERSTRUCTURE UNDER CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION STATUS

- PILING, COFFERDAM & RAFT COMPLETE - SUPERSTRUCTURE UNDER CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION STATUS

- PILING, COFFERDAM & RAFT COMPLETE - SUPERSTRUCTURE UNDER CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION STATUS

- PILING, COFFERDAM & RAFT COMPLETE - SUPERSTRUCTURE UNDER CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION STATUS

FINIS THANK YOU