Chapter 7. Assessing the availability of nonacid cations to creeping bentgrass in sand. rootzones

Similar documents
Chapter 4. Potassium availability indices and turfgrass performance in a calcareous sand. putting green*

Taking the Confusion Out of Soil Testing. Bill Kreuser University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

Bentgrass response to K fertilization and K release rates from eight sand rootzone sources used in putting green construction.

Irrigation Water Testing & Interpretation. Dennis Martin, PhD Professor & Turfgrass Extension/ Research Specialist

Nitrogen Rates and Forms for Maximum Quality and Growth of Penn A-4 Creeping Bentgrass

The Effect of Phosphorus Fertilizer Rate and Application Time on Rice Growth and Yield

Are Soil Tests Worth It? Making Soil Tests Work for YOU. The Familiar Process. Soil Tests Miss the Most Important Nutrient

Macronutrient Removal by Muskmelons Grown on Calcareous Soils

Assessment of Multielement Extractants for Prediction of Available Potassium in Thai Soils

Testing field-moist soil samples improves the assessment of potassium needs by crops

NITROGEN MINERALIZATION IN SOME CALCAREOUS SOILS OF IRAQ. Faiz G. Aziz, Hamad M. Salih, Barzan I. Khayatt, M. A. Umran

Reed Canarygrass Response to Nitrogen and Chloride Fertilization

Interpretation of Soil Testing Results

by: Dr. Bob Lippert and Dr. Kathy Moore Which section of the lab would you like to visit?

Can Sugar Beet Juice Effluent Be Used as a Biofertilizer?

Reimplementation of Moist Soil Testing to Improve the Assessment of Crop-Available Potassium in Iowa Soils

Chapter Four: The Influence of Trinexapac-ethyl on Creeping Bentgrass Golf. Putting Green Critical Soil Test Phosphorus Level

The 4Rs and Potassium. Sally Flis, Ph.D., CCA. Director of Agronomy, The Fertilizer Institute, Washington, D.C.

Managing Salinity in Walnuts. Janet Caprile Farm Advisor UC Cooperative Extension Contra Costa & Alameda Counties

Nutrient Removal by Major Vegetable Crops Grown on Calcareous Soils in s. Texas Research Summary

Edible Hemp Foliar Sampling Project 2018 Judson Reid and Lindsey Pashow; Harvest NY Cornell Cooperative Extension

Water Management in Pecan Orchards. Dr. Jim Walworth Dept. of Soil, Water & Environmental Sci. University of Arizona

POTASSIUM MANAGEMENT, SOIL TESTING AND CROP RESPONSE. Antonio P. Mallarino and Ryan R. Oltmans Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames

bulk density (g/cm3)

EVALUATION OF THE ILLINOIS SOIL NITROGEN TEST IN THE NORTH CENTRAL REGION i. Abstract. Introduction

Hamdy A. (ed.). Regional Action Programme (RAP): Water resources management and water saving in irrigated agriculture (WASIA PROJECT)

Improved Fertilizer use Efficiency with Controlled Release Sources on Sandy Soils in South Florida. FDACS Contract

COMAND provides a natural, cost effective way of maintaining quality playing surfaces, while creating wear tolerant and attractive turfgrass

Application of biochar from coconut shells to different soils in Thua Thien Hue province, Vietnam

Antonio P. Mallarino Iowa State University, John E. Sawyer Iowa State University,

1/21/2019. Where does your water come from? Irrigation Water Testing and Interpretation: Case Studies from the Field

Guide to Sports Turf Products. Innovative Solutions for Managing Water and Other Resources

Monitoring Electrical Conductivity in Soils and Growing Media By Thomas D. Landis and R.Kasten Dumroese

Lecture 18. Soil Acidity, Alkalinity, and Socidity

SHOULD P BE BANNED FROM LAWN FERTILIZER? Wayne R. Kussow 1/ The Agronomic Side

LAGOON WATER, MANURES AND BIOSOLIDS APPLIED TO ALFALFA: PROS AND CONS. Roland D. Meyer, Blake L. Sanden and Khaled M.

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIELD MONITORING 1. Bradford D. Brown ABSTRACT

Seedcotton Yield and Petiole Potassium Concentrations as Affected by Potassium Fertilization

PEPPERMINT RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILIZER IN CENTRAL OREGON 1. Alan R. Mitchell and Neysa A. Farris. Abstract

Further Evaluations of High Pressure Water Injection as a Turf Management Tool

NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY TO CORN FROM DAIRY MANURES AND FERTILIZER IN A CALCAREOUS SOIL

EC / EM Data for Salinity and Zones

PHOSPHORUS, POTASSIUM, AND MINOR ELEMENT FERTILIZATION

Influence of Ironite and Phosphorus on Yield of Oats and Content of Lead and Arsenic at Different Stages of Growth

Leaching fraction effects on salt management and nitrate losses in commercial lettuce production

State of the art precision equipment run by dedicated staff guarantee rapid turnaround analyses, a service the Laboratory prides itself on.

Influence of Continuous Organic Amendments on Growth and Productivity of Red Pepper and Soil Properties

Nitrogen Dynamics Feeding the Crops that Feed Us

EFFECTS OF LIME AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SOLIDS CONTENT IN GARLIC CLOVES

Evaluation of Air-infused Water Applied to Creeping Bentgrass Turf Prairie Turfgrass Research Centre Mark A. Anderson and James B.

Soil Sampling, Preparation and Analysis

TB154: Phosphorus and Potassium Availability in Wood Ash-Amended Soils: An Incubation Study

Sharon Benes Professor, Dept. Plant Science CSU Fresno. UC-ANR Vegetable Crops Program Team Meeting December 10, 2014; Davis, CA

Reused Water for Turf. Bernd Leinauer Professor & Extension Turfgrass Specialist New Mexico State University

Wetting Agents QUALIBRA Deeper Thinking

Multicomponent Solute Transport in Two Multifactorial Experiments

EFFECT OF MAGNETIC TREATED IRRIGATION WATER ON SALT REMOVAL FROM A SANDY SOIL AND ON THE AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN NUTRIENTS

project Leader: Dr. R. J. Zasoski (916) or cooperators: R.D. Meyer, H. Schulbach, and J.P. Edstrom.

High-Yielding Soybean: Genetic Gain Fertilizer Nitrogen Interaction

Determination of the Growing Degree Day Reapplication Threshold for the Anuew PGR. Glen Obear & Bill Kreuser, Ph.D.

Physical and chemical properties of pyrolyzed biosolids for utilization in sand-based turfgrass rootzones

Soil fertility management for pepper production

Field evaluation of wetting agent efficacy against localized dry spot and hydrophobicity in creeping bentgrass putting green turf -AquaAid

REPORT NUMBER REPORT DATE SEND TO ISSUE DATE Apr 18, Apr 18, 2017 RECEIVED DATE Apr 05, 2017

Remediation of Brine Spills- What Goes Wrong Kerry Sublette

FROM TURFGRASS. A Dissertation. Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School. of Cornell University. Doctor of Philosophy. Douglas James Soldat

Fertilizer Experimentation, Data Analyses, and Interpretation for Developing Fertilization Recommendations Examples with Vegetable Crop Research 1

LECTURE 17 SOIL TESTING. Soil Testing, STL Functions. Soil Testing

IDENTIFICATION OF REASONS FOR HIGH TEMPORAL SOIL-TEST POTASSIUM VARIATION

Review of Current Sugarcane Fertilizer Recommendations: A Report from the UF/IFAS Sugarcane Fertilizer Standards Task Force 1

Corn Silage Potential in Central Oregon

CONTINUING NITROGEN INJECTION RESEARCH P.E Rieke, D.E. Karcher, and J. Neer Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Michigan State University

Laboratory Fee Schedule

TB134: A Laboratory Study to Assess Methods for Predicting ph Change of Ash Amended Forest Soils

Small Scale Hand hoe Conservation Farming a Tool for Biodiversity Conservation in Zambia

Soil Testing and Nutrient Management. Craig Cogger Soil Scientist WSU Puyallup

Total Dissolved Solids

13 4III1 I Li, ULU EFFECT OF IRRIGATION METHOD AND LEACHING OF 1 NITRATE-NITROGEN ON SUCROSE PRODUCTION BY SUGARBEETS

Recommended Soil Sulfate-S Tests

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

The Effect of Rootzone Mix and Compaction on Nitrogen Leaching in Kentucky bluegrass

Evaluation of tomato growth and soil properties under methods of seedling bed preparation in an alfisol in the rainforest zone of Southwest Nigeria

Soil Sampling and Nutrient Recommendations. Kent Martin SW Agronomy Agent Update 12/1/2009

K. Carey, A.J. Porter, E.M. Lyons and K.S. Jordan. Department of Plant Agriculture and the Guelph Turfgrass Institute, University of Guelph, Ontario.

Applying Dairy Lagoon Water to Alfalfa

Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils

Funding Agencies: The Environmental Institute for Golf and Georgia Golf Environmental Foundation

Aquatrols Guide to Assessing and Managing Turfgrass Salinity Issues in Irrigation Water and Soils

A Method of Measuring Available Silicates in Paddy Soils <!) ~ 150 ~ :o~ ::, ~'co '- ~ ::, C <.> :!: :;;.5- ~ ~ ., ~ ~ ci5 :=..-.

Remtech 2013 by Jean Paré, P. Eng. Chemco Inc.

Introducing the new planting methods for cultivation of alfalfa cultivars in highly saline soils

Evaluation copy. Total Dissolved Solids. Computer INTRODUCTION

Turf Irrigation Series No. 2. Drought Resistance and Efficient Irrigation for the Cool-Humid Region

H. Mansouri 1, B. Mostafazadeh-Fard 2 & A. Neekabadi 3 1 Ab-Fan Consulting Engineers, Iran 2 Irrigation Department, College of Agriculture, Abstract

Nutrient Plant Availability Coefficients for Manures in North Carolina Jot Smyth and David Crouse, Soil Science Department, N.C.

Oregon State University Seed Laboratory

4/17/2014. Using Compost to Improve Post-fire Water Quality. David Crohn University of California, Riverside. Acknowledgements

Soil Test Advanced. Southwest Agricultural Conference Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada 3-4 January 2013

Rice Response to the Time and Rate of Potassium Fertilization

Transcription:

Chapter 7. Assessing the availability of nonacid cations to creeping bentgrass in sand rootzones 114

115 Abstract Nonacid cation availability is assessed by soil nutrient analyses. We evaluated three soil testing methods (0.01 M SrCl 2, 1:5 H 2 O, and Mehlich 3) for their ability to extract a plant-available fraction of the soil nonacid cations in four sands ranging in ph from 5.0 to 8.5. Creeping bentgrass [Agrostis stolonifera var. palustris (Huds.) Farw.] leaf content of nonacid cations was used as an index of nutrient availability in the soil. Creeping bentgrass (A-1) plants were grown from seed (7.5 g m -2 ) in a greenhouse at Ithaca, NY. Nitrogen, S, and P were applied as fertilizers, and deionized water was applied as irrigation to prevent drought stress. Mehlich 3 extractable nonacid cations were not evaluated in the calcareous sand. Even in the non-calcareous sands, the 0.01 M SrCl 2 and the 1:5 H 2 O were equivalent to the Mehlich 3 method in their ability to extract a plant-available fraction of soil nonacid cations. Leaf Ca, Mg, and K contents were within a currently accepted sufficiency range even at Mehlich 3 extractable Ca, Mg, and K levels that are classified as low. The Mehlich 3 test should be calibrated with more accuracy for creeping bentgrass grown on sand rootzones, and the 0.01 M SrCl 2 and 1:5 H 2 O extraction methods should be tested in additional sands to better understand the practicality of their use as universal extractants for sand rootzones. Introduction The nonacid cations Ca, Mg, and K are essential plant nutrients. An additional nonacid cation, Na, can beneficially or adversely affect plant growth (Marschner, 1995).

116 Soil nutrient analyses are used to assess the availability of soil nutrients for uptake by plant roots. For each extraction method, the quantity of nutrient extracted is used as an index of availability. Calibration of the availability indices with a crop yield or quality response should be done in different soil types, and an equivalent of 20 siteyears of data are desired for development of robust indices (Nelson and Anderson, 1977). In the turfgrass field, there are two obstacles to proper interpretation of soil nutrient analyses. First, we are not aware of any studies relating extracted soil nutrients to turfgrass growth or quality across a representative range of soils and sites. Secondly, extracting solutions in use at commercial soil testing laboratories were developed for use in soils containing clay. Highly-maintained turfgrass is often established on sand rootzones, but no commercial laboratories offer tests that use an extracting solution designed for assessing the chemical status of sand rootzones. Previous work (Woods et al., 2004; Woods et al., 2005a; Woods et al., 2005b) has shown that changes in extractable nonacid cations can be detected with greater facility when the extraction solution adjusts to the ph of sand samples. We have evaluated an extracting solution of 0.01 M SrCl 2 for its ability to extract K (Woods et al., 2005a; Woods et al., 2006) and Ca and Mg (Woods et al., 2005b) from a calcareous sand rootzone. Carrow et al. (2003) have argued that traditional extracting solutions such as Mehlich 3 are better predictors of nutrient availability in low cation exchange capacity (CEC) sand rootzones than are water soluble nutrients. An alternative view has also been presented (Woods, 2004), in which water soluble nutrients are proposed as a useful predictor of nutrient status in sand rootzones. However, there are not enough data to support either view.

117 We conducted an experiment under greenhouse conditions to investigate the relationships between extractable soil nonacid cations and A-1 creeping bentgrass leaf content of nonacid cations. Leaf content of a particular nonacid cation was used as an indicator of that element s availability for root uptake in the soil. Three soil test methods were used to assess plant available nutrients: Mehlich 3, 0.01 M SrCl 2, and 1:5 H 2 O. Our objective was to determine which of the extraction methods, if any, were most suited for assessment of plant-available nonacid cations in sand rootzones. Materials and Methods Four sand samples were obtained from established turfgrass sites. Sand properties are shown in Table 7.1. Samples were dried and passed through a 2 mm screen. Fir-cell containers (Ray Leach Conetainer, Model RLC3, Steuwe & Sons, Corvallis, OR) with 49 ml volume were prepared by placing 12 cm 2 pieces of 2-ply cheesecloth on the inside of each container to keep sand from spilling through the drainage holes. Dried sand was placed into the containers. For each sand, 13 replicate containers were prepared. Creeping bentgrass seed (A-1, Tee-2-Green, Hubbard, OR) was applied to each container at 7.5 g m -2. The seeded containers were transferred to a greenhouse and deionized water was applied through a hand-operated spray bottle to maintain sufficient moisture for seed germination.

118 Table 7.1. Initial ph and extractable nonacid cations for the sands used in the study at Ithaca, NY. Four replicate measurements were made, and standard errors are shown in parentheses. Sand Measure Method A B C D 1:1 H 2 O 4.99 5.00 6.10 6.18 7.25 7.30 8.42 8.50 ph 0.01 M CaCl 2 4.17 4.22 5.27 5.29 6.22 6.28 7.58 7.79 mg kg -1 Ca 0.01 M SrCl 2 14 (1.0) 197 (3.7) 201 (3.6) 277 (9.4) 1:5 H 2 O 2 (0.1) 4 (0.1) 5 (0.3) 45 (0.7) Mehlich 3 151 (39) 469 (38) 413 (33) 17758 (202) Mg 0.01 M SrCl 2 4 (0.1) 37 (0.4) 31 (1.2) 10 (0.1) 1:5 H 2 O 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) Mehlich 3 26 (2.1) 84 (3.6) 63 (1.8) 270 (3.2) K 0.01 M SrCl 2 4 (0.2) 43 (0.6) 48 (2.0) 9 (0.3) 1:5 H 2 O 2 (0.2) 14 (0.3) 40 (1.4) 5 (0.4) Mehlich 3 20 (2.0) 80 (0.6) 71 (1.3) 58 (0.6) Na 0.01 M SrCl 2 0 (0.4) 7 (0.3) 1 (0.3) 0 (0.2) 1:5 H 2 O 0 (0.2) 3 (0.2) 0 (0.2) 0 (0.1) Mehlich 3 12 (0.5) 17 (2.0) 12 (1.0) 18 (0.9)

119 Figure 7.1. The greenhouse air temperature over the course of the experiment at Ithaca, NY. After the seeds germinated, the grass was grown in the greenhouse with an average day (06:00 to 20:00) temperature of 27 C and an average night (20:00 to 06:00) temperature of 22 C. A datalogger (HOBO U12-012, Onset Computer Corporation, Bourne, MA) was used to record air temperature on 10 minute intervals; these results are shown in Fig. 7.1. The mass of each container was recorded approximately one time per week, and sufficient irrigation was applied to establish equivalent volumetric soil water content in each container. Additional irrigations with deionized water were applied as necessary to prevent wilting. All water was applied with graduated syringes.

120 Solutions of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and NH 4 H 2 PO 4 were prepared in deionized water and were applied to provide a total of 7 g N and 10 g P m -2 65 d -1. The relatively high P applications were made to ensure that adequate P was available to meet plant requirements. The bentgrass was trimmed with surgical scissors at a height of approximately 5 mm above the sand surface. The mass of fresh leaf clippings was immediately recorded, and the clippings were dried at 80 C for 48 h before dry weight of the clippings was recorded. Tissue water content (TWC) was calculated as: Fresh weight Dry weight Fresh weight [1] Sixteen containers (4 of each sand) were randomly selected for destructive harvest 35 days after planting, sixteen more were harvested 50 days after planting, and the remaining 20 containers (5 of each sand) were harvested 65 days after planting. When destructively harvesting, all verdure was cut with surgical scissors and was weighed and dried as above. The sand was removed from the containers and was oven-dried overnight. Nonacid cations were extracted from the dried sand samples by three methods: Mehlich 3 (Mehlich, 1984), 1:5 H 2 O (Soil and Plant Analysis Council, 1999), and 0.01 M SrCl 2. The 0.01 M SrCl 2 extraction is a modification of the 0.01 M CaCl 2 method of Houba et al. (2000), with the 0.01 M SrCl 2 test using a 2 g sample and 20 ml solution and a shaking time of just 5 minutes. Nonacid cations were measured in solution by inductively-coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP). Soil ph was measured in 1:1 H 2 O and 1:1 0.01 M CaCl 2 suspensions. Nonacid cations in the leaf tissue were measured by a modified dry ash method (Greweling, 1976). Because of relatively low sample sizes (< 10 to > 40 mg dry tissue) the samples

121 were ashed and dissolved in acid to a final volume of 8 ml. Nonacid cations were measured in the solution by ICP. Data were plotted to show the relationship between extractable soil nonacid cations and corresponding leaf content of the nonacid cations for each container at the time it was destructively harvested. Comparisons between methods are based on visual interpretation of the plotted data. Results and Discussion Mehlich 3 data for sand D were omitted from the results because the extractant is not appropriate for calcareous sands. Calcium Leaf Ca content ranged from 1 to 26 g kg -1. A reported sufficiency range for creeping bentgrass leaf Ca content is 1.5 to 7.6 g kg -1 (Anonymous, 2005). The 0.01 M SrCl 2 and 1:5 H 2 O extraction removed fractions of soil Ca that were predictive of leaf Ca content in all four sands (Fig 7.2). In the three non-calcareous sands, the Mehlich 3 extractable Ca data were clustered by sand (Fig. 7.2), and the 0.01 M SrCl 2 or 1:5 H 2 O extractable Ca appear to be more useful as indicators of Ca bioavailability. Carrow et al. (2004) reported a sufficiency range for Mehlich 3 extractable Ca of 500 to 750 mg kg -1. Only one non-calcareous sample had Mehlich 3 extractable Ca within this reported sufficiency range, whereas 89% of the leaf samples had Ca content within the sufficiency range reported by Anonymous (2005). This discrepancy between soil and plant sufficiency ranges can lead to misinterpretation of soil and plant analyses. Gratuitous fertilizer applications are sometimes recommended in attempts to meet these established but unproven sufficiency ranges.

122 Figure 7.2. Scatter plot of extractable Ca and leaf Ca content for A-1 creeping bentgrass grown in a greenhouse at Ithaca, NY. Leaf Ca and soil Ca were measured on the same day through destructive harvests. Results are shown for 0.01 M SrCl 2, 1:5 H 2 O, and Mehlich 3 soil test procedures.

123 Magnesium Leaf Mg content ranged from 1.8 to 5.3 g kg -1 (Fig. 7.3). A sufficiency range for creeping bentgrass Mg content of 0.8 to 3.1 g kg -1 has been reported (Anonymous, 2005). Leaf Mg content was not influenced by extractable Mg at soil Mg above 5, 2, and 45 mg kg -1, for the 0.01 M SrCl 2, 1:5 H 2 O, and Mehlich 3 extractions, respectively (Fig. 7.3). The results for these four sands suggest that more extractable Mg from a sand may not be associated with a correspondent increase in plant uptake of Mg. Potassium Leaf K content on a dry matter basis (K d ) ranged from 5 to 25 g kg -1 (Fig. 7.4). Anonymous (2005) presented a sufficiency range for creeping bentgrass K content of 18 to 26 g kg -1. Leaf K d increased with extractable K from both the 0.01 M SrCl 2 and the 1:5 H 2 O extractions in all sands. For the Mehlich 3 extraction, even with calcareous samples excluded, soil K was not well-correlated with K d and extractable K was clustered by individual sands (Fig. 7.4). This is may be due to dissolution of mineral K during the extraction process. Although that K may become available to bentgrass roots over time, it may not be represented in the leaf tissue because it would not have been available to roots at the time of sampling. Potassium status of leaves may be more rationally represented in units of mmol K L -1 tissue water (K w ) (Barraclough and Leigh, 1993; Woods et al., 2005). The K w ranged from 57 to 269 mmol L -1. Grass leaves well-supplied with K usually have K w of about 200 mmol L -1. The relationships between soil K and K w are shown in Fig. 7.5. For these four sands, the K w seemed to plateau at soil K above 12, 3, and 20 mg kg -1 by the 0.01 M SrCl 2, 1:5 H 2 O, and Mehlich 3 tests, respectively.

124 Figure 7.3. Scatter plot of extractable Mg and leaf Mg content for A-1 creeping bentgrass grown in a greenhouse at Ithaca, NY. Leaf Mg and soil Mg were measured on the same day through destructive harvests. Results are shown for 0.01 M SrCl 2, 1:5 H 2 O, and Mehlich 3 soil test procedures.

125 Figure 7.4. Scatter plot of extractable K and leaf K content for A-1 creeping bentgrass grown in a greenhouse at Ithaca, NY. Leaf K and soil K were measured on the same day through destructive harvests. Results are shown for 0.01 M SrCl 2, 1:5 H 2 O, and Mehlich 3 soil test procedures.

126 Figure 7.5. Scatter plot of extractable K and leaf K w (mmol L -1 ) content for A-1 creeping bentgrass grown in a greenhouse at Ithaca, NY. Leaf K w and soil K were measured on the same day through destructive harvests. Results are shown for 0.01 M SrCl 2, 1:5 H 2 O, and Mehlich 3 soil test procedures.

127 Carrow et al. (2004) reported a sufficiency range for extractable Mehlich 3 K in sand rootzones of 50 to 115 mg kg -1. We found K w to be at a sufficient level in the bentgrass leaves at Mehlich 3 K of 20 mg kg -1. Leaf K d was compared with K w as a predictor of daily dry matter production (Fig. 7.6). The dry matter production increased with K w, but there was a plateau of dry matter production at K d above 13 g kg -1. These results show the potential of K w as a more accurate indicator of creeping bentgrass K status, and the data suggest that a failure to account for leaf water content may create the appearance of luxury consumption of K. Figure 7.6. Daily dry matter production of A-1 creeping bentgrass grown in a greenhouse at Ithaca, NY, is plotted on leaf K content (g kg -1 ) and on leaf K w (mmol L -1 ).

128 Sodium Leaf Na content ranged from 0.1 to 2 g kg -1. There were no instances in which soil Na was related to leaf Na content. This is probably because soil Na levels were too low to have a measurable impact on Na uptake. There were no consistent relationships between leaf K and leaf Na content. We expect that experiments in systems with more Na would show positive relationships between soil Na and leaf Na. Conclusion Extracting solutions which adjusted to the ph of the soil during the extraction process extracted Ca, Mg, and K fractions from the soil that were interpretable as indices of nutrient availability. Results from these four sands suggest that dilute salt or water-based extractants can extract plant-available fractions of Ca, Mg, and K. The 0.01 M SrCl 2 and 1:5 H 2 O tests can predict nutrient availability in sands with a range of ph and extractable nonacid cations. Because these sands differed in ph and in extractable nonacid cations, the data were clustered to some degree by sand type, depending on the extractant and the particular cation (Figs. 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5). Future experiments should consider the plant-availability of nonacid cations in a larger set of sands with a continuous gradient of extractable nonacid cations. The data shown here (Figs. 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5) represent soil test results and leaf nutrient contents as measured on the same date. In practice, soil nutrient analyses are used to predict fertilizer needs or to assess soil nutrient levels. We consider it informative to assess plant-available nutrients in soil by sampling the soil and the plant as close in time as possible. It should be noted that in sand rootzones, and especially in those with low levels of plant-available nutrients, the correspondence between soil and plant nutrient levels may vary considerably if samples for soil and plant nutrient analyses are taken

129 farther apart in time. In these four sands with soil and plant samples collected on the same day, our results suggest that Mehlich 3 sufficiency ranges for nonacid cations in sand rootzones should be re-evaluated. Future research should investigate these extractants and creeping bentgrass growth in a wider range of sands. The relationships between extractable nonacid cations and plant response should be considered to determine if soil test levels can predict future plant response in sand rootzones, or if the relationships are confined to detection of past or current plant response.

130 References Anonymous. 2005. Interpretive nutrient levels for plant analysis creeping bentgrass [online]. Available at http://www.aasl.psu.edu/plant%20recs/grass,%20creeping%20bent.pdf (verified 7 Dec. 2005). Barraclough, P.B. and R.A. Leigh. 1993. Grass yield in relation to potassium supply and the concentration of cations in tissue water. J. Agric. Sci. 121:157-168. Carrow, R.N., L. Stowell, W. Gelernter, S. Davis, R.R. Duncan, and J. Skorulski. 2003. Clarifying soil testing: I. Saturated paste and dilute extracts. Golf Course Mgmt. 71(9):81-85. Carrow, R.N., L. Stowell, W. Gelernter, S. Davis, R.R. Duncan, and J. Skorulski. 2004. Clarifying soil testing: III. SLAN sufficiency ranges and recommendations. Golf Course Manage. 72(1):194-198. Greweling, T. 1976. Dry ashing. Cornell University Ag. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 6(8):4. Houba, V.J.G., E.J.M. Temminghoff, G.A. Gaikhorst, and W. van Vark. 2000. Soil analysis procedures using 0.01 M calcium chloride as extraction reagent. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 31:1299-1396. Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2 nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego. Mehlich, A. 1984. Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15:1409-1416. Nelson, L.A., and R.L. Anderson. 1977. Partitioning of soil test crop response probability. p. 19-37. In T.R. Peck et al. (ed.). Soil testing: correlating and interpreting the analytical results. ASA Spec. Publ. 29. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. Soil and Plant Analysis Council. 1999. Major cations (potassium, calcium, magnesium, and sodium). p. 93-115. In Soil Analysis: Handbook of Reference Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 93-115. Woods, M.S. 2004. Q & A: Water-based extraction methods for turf soils. TurfNet Monthly. 11(5):8-9. Woods, M. S., Q. M. Ketterings, and F. S. Rossi. 2004. Estimation of cation exchange capacity in sand rootzones. ASA Annu. Meet. Abstr.

131 Woods, M.S., F.S. Rossi, and Q.M. Ketterings. 2005. Potassium content of turfgrass leaves expressed on a tissue water basis. ASA Annu. Meet. Abstr. Woods, M.S., Q.M. Ketterings, and F.S. Rossi. 2005a. Effectiveness of standard soil tests for assessing potassium availability in sand rootzones. Soil Sci. 170(2):110-119. Woods, M.S., Q.M. Ketterings, and F.S. Rossi. 2005b. Measuring the effects of potassium applications on calcium and magnesium availability in a calcareous sand. Intl. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 10:1015-1020. Woods, M.S., Q.M. Ketterings, and F.S. Rossi. 2006. Potassium availability indices and turfgrass performance in a calcareous sand putting green. Crop Sci. 46 (doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0218).