LOUISIANA DOTD TRAFFIC MONITORING/DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM & UPDATES

Similar documents
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Spatial Modeling for Highway Performance Monitoring System Data: Part 1. Tuesday, February 27, :00-4:00 PM ET

Tennessee Model Users Group. Organizational Meeting December 2, 2004

Office of Transportation Data (OTD)

Traffic Data Quality Analysis. James Sturrock, PE, PTOE, FHWA Resource Center Operations Team

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Spatial Modeling for Highway Performance Monitoring System Data: Part 2. Tuesday, March 6, :00-3:00 PM ET

TDMS A Traffic Data Repository for Government and Business Use

9. TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL DEVELOPMENT

Central Data Repository for Traffic Data Collection in Rural Areas and Corridors Supporting Freight Mobility

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional. Brad Shelton, VDOT Chris Detmer, VDOT Ben Mannell, VDOT

STATEWIDE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND REPORTING SYSTEM (STARS II)

NYSDOT Roadway Inventory. Both On and Off the State System

OVERVIEW: Treatment Length Segmentation KEY POINTS

MAP-21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Creates jobs and supports economic growth

Traffic Data Programs at Virginia DOT: 10 plus Years of Innovation

UCI ITS Research Team

Traffic and ESAL Summary for the MnROAD Mainline. (July 1994 June 2011)

All Roads Do Not End at the State Line: Methodologies for Enabling Geodata Sharing Across Boundaries

OHIO TRAFFIC FORECASTING MANUAL. Module 2: Traffic Forecasting Methodologies

SR 60 Grade Separation over CSX Railroad Traffic Technical Memorandum

Table of Contents. List of Appendices

Managing Freight Mobility. Statewide Traffic Mobility Manager

NATMEC June 30, 2014 Anita Vandervalk, PE, PMP

Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Presented to : I 710 Project Committee June 30, 2011

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 3 Existing Facilities & System Performance

100 Design Controls and Exceptions

A Simplified Pavement Design Tool TxAPA Annual Meeting Danny Gierhart, P.E. Senior Regional Engineer Asphalt Institute.

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

100 Introduction Functional Classification Traffic Data Terrain & Locale Design & Legal Speed...

The Highway Economic Requirements System (HERS): How HERS Works

NATMEC June 22, 2010

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

FHWA-NJ ESTIMATION OF TRUCK VOLUMES AND FLOWS FINAL REPORT August 2004

SHIFT ODME Model & Utilities. Prepared For: Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies

Design, Development, and Implementation of a Statewide Traffic Monitoring System

APPLICATION OF SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS TO SUBSEQUENT YEAR DATA. Corresponding Author

PRICING STRATEGIES PRESENTED BY JEFFREY D. ENSOR MALAYSIA TRANSPORT RESEARCH GROUP TO THE NOVEMBER 25, 2003

Framework for ADOT Asset Management System. Jean A. Nehme, PhD, PE Arizona Department of Transportation

Transportation Management Data:

Joint House and Senate Transportation Committee Update to the Ten Year Plan

RIDOT S Statewide Roadway and Asset Data Collection Project

The TIS is to be signed and sealed by a Florida Registered Professional Engineer.

I-64 Peninsula Shoulder Usage Evaluation. Eric Stringfield VDOT Hampton Roads Transportation Planning April 3, 2013

This Webinar is being presented from a computer with a resolution of 1280 X 1024.

Progress Meeting 3: Deployment Site Selection

APPENDIX D. Glossary D-1

Appendix C: GHG Emissions Model

KANSAS WORK ZONE SAFETY AND MOBILITY PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES

INVITATION TO BID FOR TRAFFIC COUNT SERVICES

Automated Statewide Highway Intersection Safety Data Collection and Evaluation Strategy

REQUIREMENTS WEBINAR FEBRUARY 20, :00 2:30 P.M.

CHAPTER 5. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Transportation Goals & Objectives

Management. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office

CHAPTER 7. TRAVEL PATTERNS AND TRAVEL FORECASTING

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

GDOT-Office of Planning Update

NJDOT: Asset Management Strategies and Tools

The Week at a Glance Week Ending February 23, 2007

TRANSPORTATION PROJECT REPORT DRAFT CONCEPTUAL ACCESS MODIFICATION PROPOSAL OCTOBER 2002

MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Model Characteristics

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION PROCESS

Geni Bahar, P.E. Describe key concepts and applications

CORE MPO Freight Transportation Plan. Project Advisory Committee

Implementation Activities of New MEPDG in Louisiana. Zhongjie Doc Zhang, PhD, PE

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

IAn Imperative for, and Current

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

Keep Roads and Bridges in Good Condition. Dennis Heckman, State Bridge Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MAP-21/FAST Act Performance Measures and Targets. MEETING DATE: September 20, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 4H

Dec 20, 2007 Operations Performance Measures Conference Call

THE PROJECT. Executive Summary. City of Industry. City of Diamond Bar. 57/60 Confluence.

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAC August 2, 2017

Bow Concord I-93 Improvements City of Concord Transportation Policy Advisory Committee

Transportation Facility Inventory

APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS

Travel Time Reliability in the SLOCOG Region. October 27, 2014 San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Transportation Education Series

City of Menifee. Public Works Department. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

ACTION TRANSMITTAL

Project Traffic Forecasting H A N D B O O K

Concept of Operations

Truck GPS Data for Freight Planning

EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR FINANCIAL PROJECT ID TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSM&O) GENERAL CONSULTANT SERVICES

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional Classification System. Briefing to MPOs, PDCs, and Local Governments

Section 3-01 General Concepts, Design Standards and Design Exceptions TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Asset Management and Pavement Performance Measures The 30, mile view.

Right-of-Way Permit Process

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet

PORT OF FERNANDINA TRUCK CIRCULATION STUDY

CITY OF VALLEJO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT Analysis/Study GUIDELINES

Prioritization for Infrastructure Investment in Transportation

2016 Arizona Pavement/Materials Conference. Dennis Smith MAG Executive Director (602)

Using GIS to Support Multi-year Pavement MR&R Need Analysis

Standardization of Travel Demand Models

The ipems MAP-21 Module

THICKNESS HICKN ESS ESI ES G I N A ph a t l Pa P v a em e ents for r Hi way a s y s & & St S ree

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

Urban Street Safety, Operation, and Reliability

Freight Transportation Planning and Modeling Spring 2012

A MODAL COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION EFFECTS ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. November 2007

Transcription:

LOUISIANA DOTD TRAFFIC MONITORING/DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM & UPDATES George Chike, P.E. Traffic Data Collection & Management System www.dotd.la.gov

DOTD FIELD CREWS Routine traffic volume counts Vehicle classification counts

ROUTINE TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS Also called Short Duration Counts 24-hour Counts for AADT greater than 5000, e.g. I-10 48-hour Counts are acceptable for lower AADT roads Monitor state maintained routes 1700 sites per year are monitored per 3-year cycle Monitor each parish on a 3-year cycle as well

ROUTINE TRAFFIC CLASS COUNTS Also called Short Duration Class Counts 24-hour Counts for AADT greater than 5000, e.g. I-10 48-hour Counts are acceptable for lower AADT roads Monitor state maintained routes 433 sites per year are monitored per 3-year cycle Monitor each parish on a 3-year cycle as well

ROUTINE TRAFFIC CLASS COUNTS Road tube placement

ROUTINE TRAFFIC CLASS COUNTS Vehicle Classifier Secured to a post

FHWA 13 Vehicle Classes ROUTINE TRAFFIC CLASS COUNTS

Six Major Vehicle Types ROUTINE TRAFFIC CLASS COUNTS *8, 9, & 10 may also be called Single Trailer Trucks.

Continuous Count System (CCS) or PATR - About 65 Permanent monitoring sites - Polled daily by telemetry - Malfunctions serviced asap

A Radar Site on I-55 Typical CCS

An Inductive Loop Site on LA-10 Typical CCS

An Inductive Loop Site on LA-1 Typical CCS

An Inductive Loop Site on LA-1 Typical CCS

General display of CCS Continuous Count System (CCS) Cont d

Upgrading PATR sites to Cellular Analog Modem Cellular Modem

Upgrading PATR sites to Cellular RTMS G4 Radar RTMS Sx-300 Radar

CCS (PATR) SITES

CONTRACTED SERVICES Blanket traffic volume and Ramp traffic counts Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) Program - new Traffic Data Management

BLANKET TRAFFIC VOLUME AND RAMP TRAFFIC COUNTS Monitor local roads not maintained by state Also considered as Short Duration (48-hour counts) Approximately 50,000 blanket stations statewide Started monitoring Interstate Exit Ramps in 2016* Each Ramp site monitored per 6-year cycle (48-hour count)* *This is a new program, we have some data but limited and not yet statewide

BLANKET TRAFFIC VOLUME AND RAMP TRAFFIC COUNTS 5,000 sites per year monitored per 10-year cycle Each Parish is monitored per 10-year cycle as well Work is performed by private contractors/consultants

SOME TRAFFIC DATA USES

Traffic Volume: Roads & Highway improvements Analysis of highway capacity & density Determination of highway LOS Determination of highway functional class Forecasting future traffic volumes Design of traffic control systems

VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION Pavement design Forecasts of travel by vehicle type Cost of vehicle operation Speed limit & oversize vehicle policy Safety conflicts due to vehicle mix Highway cost allocation

Truck Weight-in-motion Bridge design & loading Weight distance taxes or use fees Weight & standard enforcement Posting of load limits on bridges for safety Resurfacing forecasts Trends in freight movement Permit policy for overweight vehicle, e.g. fines

Familiar sight? Lack of enforcement will result in this

COMING SOON www.dotd.la.gov

TRAFFIC DATA INTEGRATION WITH ESRI ROADS & HIGHWAYS ESRI Roads and Highways (R&H) A linear referencing system for DOTD to integrate data from multiple linear referencing networks Traffic Server Comprehensive suite of application modules for DOTD to follow FHWA TMG procedures for the daily, monthly and annual traffic statistics reporting

STATIONS AND SEGMENTS Traffic Server uses concept of station records for count locations Station IDs Geometry Routes LRS ID Functional Class Segments etc.

STATIONS AND SEGMENTS CONT D Traffic Server uses the concept of segments to store data relating to a section of road with homogeneous traffic volume LRS section ID Start and end mile points Functional Class Number of lanes Directionality Speed etc.

DATA SYNCHRONIZATION R&H becomes authoritative source for all linear referencing information for Traffic Server stations and segments DOTD will decide which additional fields from R&H need to be synchronized with Traffic Server

TENTATIVE WORK FLOW ESRI Roads & Highways Event Editor We can change stations & segments in info. in R&H Admin. reviews and reconciles changes from everyone Admin updates base tables of R&H using data compression LRS Admin. detects and submits changes to Traffic Server Traffic Server receives and accepts changes Some of the changes will be real time and other changes will be periodic

WHAT TRAFFIC DATA www.dotd.la.gov

DOTD Website Mainframe

DOTD Website

Find a traffic DOTD Website

DOTD Website

DOTD Website

K & D Factors

DOTD ADJUSTMENT FACTORS DATA FROM DOTD TRAFFIC SERVER

SEASONAL FACTORS Monthly Month New RFC System Old RFC System January February March April May June July August September October November December 1R 1 1.088 1.031 1.019 1.022 0.983 0.984 0.986 1.030 0.999 0.961 0.954 0.961 1U 11 1.077 1.032 1.016 1.013 1.000 0.975 0.981 1.015 0.991 0.968 0.970 0.975 2U 12 1.042 1.013 1.003 0.993 0.985 0.991 1.009 1.012 0.985 0.975 0.987 1.006 3R 2 1.037 0.994 0.979 0.993 0.984 1.007 1.022 1.018 0.983 0.971 0.997 1.020 3U 14 1.034 0.989 1.002 0.965 0.971 0..998 1.045 0.996 0.979 0.981 1.014 1.035 4R 6 1.025 0.989 0.986 0.987 0.985 0.995 1.013 1.013 0.993 0.993 1.005 1.018 4U 16 1.014 0.988 0.996 0.986 0.991 1.006 1.022 1.008 1.002 0.976 1.003 1.010 5R 7 1.051 1.011 1.006 0.975 0.976 0.990 1.037 1.012 0.970 0.957 0.998 1.025 5U 17 1.014 1.009 0.993 0.993 0.985 0.992 1.113 1.005 0.921 0.934 1.007 1.010 6R 8 1.025 0.988 1.026 1.145 0.988 0.995 1.133 0.990 0.880 0.900 0.994 0.993

Daily, 24-Hour, 48-Hour SEASONAL FACTORS Daily Factors (2016 Calendar Year) 24 Hour Monitoring Factors 48 Hour Monitoring Factors New RFC System Old RFC System (1) Monday (2) Tuesday (3) Wednesday (4) Thursday (5) Friday (6) Saturday (7) Sunday (a) Monday (b) Tuesday (d) Wednesday {e} Thursday (f) Monday (g) Tuesday (h) Wednesday IR 1 1.012 1.022 0.993 0.966 0.896 1.041 1.094 1.017 1.008 0.980 0.931 1.012 0.994 0.955 1U 11 1.008 1.001 0.979 0.955 0.899 1.040 1.155 1.005 0.99 0.967 0.927 0.997 0.979 0.947 2U 12 1.008 0.995 0.971 0.949 0.872 0.884 1.362 1.002 0.983 0.960 0.911 0.992 0.972 0.935 3R 2 1.008 0.983 0.962 0.942 0.850 1.088 1.259 0.996 0.973 0.952 0.896 0.984 0.962 0.924 3U 14 0.968 0.933 0.902 0.879 0.865 1.200 1.517 0.951 0.918 0.891 0.872 0.934 0.904 0.881 4R 6 0.994 0.958 0.933 0.950 0.902 1.058 1.298 0.976 0.946 0.942 0.926 0.721 0.710 0.696 4U 16 0.972 0.936 0.910 0.910 0.882 1.164 1.403 0.954 0.923 0.910 0.896 0.939 0.917 0.903 5R 7 0.998 0.958 0.949 0.931 0.882 1.100 1.276 0.978 0.954 0.940 0.907 0.966 0.947 0.923 5U 17 0.926 0.921 0.911 0.941 0.862 0.986 1.213 0.924 0.916 0.926 0.902 0.920 0.921 0.914 6R 8 1.032 0.923 0.925 0.921 0.908 1.124 1.268 0.978 0.924 0.923 0.915 0.951 0.924 0.919

AXLE FACTORS Yearly Axle Factors (2016 Calendar Year) Axless RFC System per Vehicle Axle Factor 1 (1R) 2.15194 0.46470 2 (3R) 2.72661 0.36676 6 (4R) 2.25825 0.44282 7 (5R) 2.27168 0.44020 8 (6R) 2.20757 0.45299 9 (7R) 2.15655 0.46370 11 (1U) 2..13832 0.46766 12 (2U) 2.42210 0.41287 14 (3U) 2.09870 0.47649 16 (4U) 2.07138 0.48277 17 (5U) 2.24836 0.44477 19 (7U) 2.02667 0.49342 *New Road Functional System coded in green

2016 K & D Values Functional System 2016 Traffic Design Values by Functional System Monitoring Site Number Highest Hourly Volume Portion of Highest Hourly Volume to AADT AADT 20th Hour 30th Hour 50th Hour Design K20 K30 K50 Design vpd vph vph vph Hour K D 1 21 45993 3725 3633 3541 30th 0.081 0.079 0.077 0.08 0.55 2 39 12647 1227 1189 1164 30th 0.097 0.094 0.092 0.09 0.67 6 43 3833 368 356 341 30th 0.096 0.093 0.089 0.09 0.52 7 40 4989 474 464 454 30th 0.095 0.093 0.091 0.09 0.63 8 17 402 51 48 44 30th 0.127 0.119 0.109 0.12 0.59 11 90 57410 4306 4134 3904 30th 0.075 0.072 0.068 0.07 0.63 14 56 7738 789 774 751 30th 0.102 0.100 0.097 0.10 0.52 16 89 15695 1632 1585 1507 30th 0.104 0.101 0.096 0.10 0.60 K - The ratio of the design hourly volume to the annual average daily traffic (AADT). D - The portion of the traffic in the higher volume direction to the total traffic at the design hourly volume. AADT - Annual average daily traffic. K30 - The proportion of AADT occurring during the 30th highest hour of the design year (8760 hours).

Average Statewide Vehicle Percentages & AADT by Functional Classification For 2016 01 (1R) 02 (3R) 06 (4R) 07 (5R) 08 (6R) 09 (7R) 11 (1U) 12 (2U) 14 (3U) 16 (4U) 17 (5U) 19 (7U) Rural Urban Principal Arterial - Functional Class Principal Principal Principal Principal Minor Major Minor Other Minor Arterial - Arterial - Local Arterial- Arterial- Arterial Collector Collector Freeways/ Arterial Interstate Other Interstate Other Express Collector Local ways Vehicle Type 1 Cycles 0.42% 0.51% 0.31% 0.38% 0.49% 0.44% 0.90% 0.31% 0.28% 0.30% 0.36% 0.49% 2 Cars 47.02% 51.32% 56.14% 55.10% 50.23% 48.18% 44.19% 59.36% 64.66% 62.43% 56.58% 68.82% 3 2A-4T 23.29% 29.37% 30.86% 31.97% 35.25% 38.22% 27.67% 25.59% 27.10% 28.31% 32.02% 24.74% 4 Busses 0.94% 0.74% 0.56% 0.75% 0.83% 0.71% 1.32% 0.66% 0.58% 0.92% 1.34% 1.46% 5 2A-SU 5.48% 5.83% 5.13% 5.81% 8.06% 6.85% 9.13% 4.75% 4.13% 4.77% 5.93% 2.94% 6 3A-SU 0.54% 0.71% 0.60% 0.88% 0.78% 1.11% 0.51% 0.56% 0.46% 0.51% 0.65% 0.88% 7 4A-SU 0.05% 0.09% 0.08% 0.07% 0.03% 0.03% 0.07% 0.06% 0.08% 0.04% 0.23% 0.03% 8 4A-ST 5.69% 2.74% 1.51% 1.64% 1.92% 1.40% 3.01% 1.84% 1.14% 1.44% 1.47% 0.31% 9 5A-ST 14.65% 7.68% 4.11% 3.05% 2.07% 2.63% 12.26% 6.15% 1.29% 0.94% 1.08% 0.32% 10 6A-ST 0.66% 0.64% 0.55% 0.35% 0.31% 0.40% 0.47% 0.45% 0.25% 0.27% 0.29% 0.01% 11 SA-MT 0.75% 0.15% 0.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.22% 0.11% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 12 6A-MT 0.35% 0.07% 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.14% 0.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 13 7A-MT 0.17% 0.16% 0.02% 0.01% 0.02% 0.02% 0.12% 0.11% 0.02% 0.07% 0.04% 0.00% T = 28.34% 18.07% 12.12% 11.81% 13.19% 12.44% 25.93% 14.08% 7.38% 8.04% 9.70% 4.49% AADT 360710 87864 72984 123365 17195 11454 282947 119687 299368 162891 39299 3566 T = truck

Truck Traffic Data on LA Highway System 2001 2016

NO. OF TRK TYPE Truck Traffic Data on LA Highway System 2001 2016 TRUCK TRAFFIC DATA ON LA HIGHWAY SYSTEM 300000 Trk AADT No. of 5A-ST Trk -class 9 (1R&1U) 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1013 2014 2015 2016 TIME (YR)

NUMBER OF TRUCK GROUP VARIATION IN TRUCK TRAFFIC ON I-12 At CCS Station #21 on a Typical Friday, August 19, 2016 900 2A-SU, 3A-SU, 4A-SU 4A-ST, 5A-ST, 6A-ST 5A-MT, 6A-MT, 7A-MT 800 700 600 616 725 742 786 749 724 620 691 733 740 663 768 582 666 500 480 400 369 345 300 200 100 0 176 207 212 225 214 207 197 209 211 177 190 220 166 190 217 195 164 137 90 104 105 98 79 83 56 62 47 26 23 24 30 4 4 4 5 9 18 29 35 35 37 36 34 30 33 35 35 32 37 28 32 23 16 10 8 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00 TIME OF DAY (HR)

VMT DATA TRUCK VMT DATA ON LA HWY SYSTEM 2010 2015 TRUCK VMT ON LA HWY SYSTEM Truck VMT 5A-ST class 9 (1R&1U) VMT 9000000 8000000 7000000 6000000 5000000 4000000 3000000 2000000 1000000 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Truck VMT 7274105 4953014 7073002 8006999 3924239 6806791 5A-ST class 9 (1R&1U) VMT 1632309 1245188 2672180 2023369 989693 1173491 TIME (YR)

www.dotd.la.gov

THANK YOU! george.chike@la.gov (225) 242-4557 Office www.dotd.la.gov