MHI s Commercial Experiences with CO 2 Capture and Recent R&D Activities

Similar documents
Deployment of World s Largest Post-combustion Carbon Capture Plant for Coal-fired Power Plants

Scaling Up CO 2 Capture Technologies for Commercial Use. ICEF 5 th Annual Meeting Tokyo, Japan October 11, 2018

Latest on CO 2 Capture Technology

Large-scale Carbon Dioxide Capture Demonstration Project at a Coal-fired Power Plant in the USA

Report to the CSLF Technology Group on the Plant Barry 25MW CCS Integrated Demonstration

Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Kiewit s Petra Nova CCS Project

NRG Petra Nova Success Story

Southern Company/MHI Ltd. 500 TPD CCS Demonstration. Jerrad Thomas Research Engineer Southern Company Services, Inc.

KM-CDR Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture with KS-1 Advanced Solvent

Available online at GHGT-9

The Future of Coal. Lou Hrkman. Carbon Free Fossil Energy. Deputy Assistant Secretary Clean Coal and Carbon Management. Office of Fossil Energy

Safe harbor statement

Capture 3 Post-Combustion Capture

Project Status and Research Plans of 500 TPD CO 2 Capture and Sequestration Demonstration

CCUS Major Demonstrations Program Overview

Office of Clean Coal and Carbon Management

EPRI Advanced Coal with CCS Industry Technology Demonstration Projects

CO 2 Capture. John Davison IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.

Sandhya Eswaran, Song Wu, Robert Nicolo Hitachi Power Systems America, Ltd. 645 Martinsville Road, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Status of CCUS in the United States. Jarad Daniels. Office of Fossil Energy. Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Clean Coal and Carbon Management

CCUS Status and New Developments.

PROGRESS REPORT. Pleasant Prairie Carbon Capture Demonstration Project Oct. 8, PLEASANT PRAIRIE, Wisconsin.

Carbon (CO 2 ) Capture

CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage - Program 165

Current Ac3vi3es of the DOE Office of Clean Coal & Carbon Management SSEB CommiFee on Clean Coal Energy Policies and Technologies

Performance and Costs of CO 2 Capture at Gas Fired Power Plants

Econamine FG Plus SM Technology for Post- Combustion CO 2 Capture

Carbon Capture Technology for Flue Gas Applications CMTC Conference in Houston, TX July 17-20, 2017

Reduction of Emissions from Combined Cycle Plants by CO 2 Capture and Storage

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal Technologies & Future Projects Presented to. David Butler Executive Director

NRG Carbon 360 SM Overview. John Ragan President NRG Carbon 360

CO 2 Capture Utilization and Sequestration (CCUS)

14th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-14

Helping Pay For CO 2 Capture Projects Through Geological Sequestration of CO 2 Used for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)

Commercialization of Clean Coal Technology with CO2 Recovery

CO 2 recovery from industrial hydrogen facilities and steel production to comply with future European Emission regulations

Status and Policy of CCUS in US Susan Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences

Reducing CO 2 Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants

Under the Scenes of our Lives High-pressure Pump

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal-Fired Power Plant Technology To Address Climate Change Concerns

CCUS Moving Ahead: Recent Technical Advances

An update on CCS technologies & costs

Carbon Capture and Sequestration and its Potential Implementation in North Carolina. Sam Helton

Siemens Carbon Capture Technology

Capturing Learnings from the Shell Peterhead Carbon Capture and Storage Project

CONTROL STRTEGIES FOR FLEXIBLE OPERATION OF POWER PLANT INTEGRATED WITH CO2 CAPTURE PLANT

Review of Project Proposed for CSLF Recognition: Al Reyadah CCUS Project (Phase I: Emirates Steel)

Integration and Onsite System Aspects of Industrial Post-Combustion CCS

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study

Technical Challenges and Cost Reduction Potential for Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Gernot Schneider Dr. Rüdiger Schneider Sylvia Hohe

NeuStream -EOR. Supplying Field Deployable Systems for CO 2 and Power Generation for the Enhanced Oil Recovery Market

Pathways for deploying CCS at Australian power plants

POST COMBUSTION CO 2 CAPTURE SCALE UP STUDY

Advanced Coal Technology 101

CARBON CAPTURE IN THE COAL SECTOR: RECENT PROGRESS AND BARRIERS

Integrating Climate. Into Our Strategy

Chilled Ammonia Technology for CO 2 Capture. October, 2006

Robert Remkes - Principal, Remkes Technology and Services

Principal Investigator Dr. Ted Chang Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

The SECARB Anthropogenic Test: CO 2 Capture/Transportation/Storage

Carbon Capture and Storage:

Commercialization Progress of CO 2 Solutions Enzyme-Based Technology for Low-Cost Carbon Mitigation

Feature: New Project Development Using Innovative Technology

MODERN COAL-FIRED OXYFUEL POWER PLANTS WITH CO 2 CAPTURE ENERGETIC AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION

Southern Company Carbon Management. Randall Rush, General Manager - Gasification Technology Roxann Laird, Director - National Carbon Capture Center

Overview of HELE coal combustion technologies. Dr Andrew Minchener OBE General Manager IEA Clean Coal Centre

Integration of Solid Sorbent CO 2 Capture Technology to Provide Flexible CO 2 Capture Options in a Time of Regulatory Uncertainty

A View of Oil Resources and the Mitigation of CO2 Emissions

CO 2 CAPTURE FROM MEDIUM SCALE COMBUSTION INSTALLATIONS. Background

Impact of novel PCC solvents on existing and new Australian coal-fired power plants 1 st PCC Conference, Abu-Dhabi

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Fluor s Econamine FG Plus SM Technology

11 th Annual CO 2 EOR Carbon Management Workshop

LANXESS CO 2 Capture plant

ION Engineering: Redefining Carbon Capture

An Industry Perspective: Significant Challenges and Potential Costs of CCS

Recent Developments of Hitachi s Advanced Solvent Technology for Post-combustion CO 2 Capture

Toshibaʼs Activities in Carbon Capture

CO 2 Capture Technologies An Overview

Fluor's Econamine FG Plus SM Technology

Saudi Aramco Carbon Capture and Utilization R&D

Modelling of CO 2 capture using Aspen Plus for EDF power plant, Krakow, Poland

Carbon Capture Technology : Current and Future R&D Focus

COMMERCIAL CCS PLANNING SESSION

ENVIRONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF CCS TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION IN THE CEMENT PROCESS CHAIN

DISPATCHABLE CCS Minimizing the Energy Penalty Costs

Available online at Energy Procedia 100 (2009) (2008) GHGT-9

Carbon Capture Options for LNG Liquefaction

CO 2 Capture and Storage AEP s Perspective

Kenneth J. Nemeth Secretary & Executive Director Southern States Energy Board. CO 2 Carbon Management Workshop December 6, 2016 Midland, Texas

CO 2 Capture and Storage for Coal-Based Power Generation

Electricity Committee. Subcommittee on Clean Coal and Carbon Management

Evaluating the Cost of Emerging Technologies

Problematica e Tecnologie per la cattura di CO 2 Stefano Consonni Dipartimento di Energetica - Politecnico di Milano

Advanced Technologies for CO 2 Capture & Utilization: Power & Industrial Applications

Testimony Carbon Capture and Sequestration Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality

2The J-POWER Group is one of the biggest coal users in Japan, consuming approximately 20 million

Development of Integrated Flexi-Burn Dual Oxidant CFB Power Plant

Transcription:

32 MHI s Commercial Experiences with CO 2 Capture and Recent R&D Activities TAKUYA HIRATA *1 SHINYA KISHIMOTO *2 MASAYUKI INUI *2 TATSUYA TSUJIUCHI *3 DAISUKE SHIMADA *2 SHIMPEI KAWASAKI *4 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MHI) started developing technology for CO 2 capture from combustion flue gas with Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc. in 1990. The first commercial plant was delivered in 1999 for a Malaysian fertilizer company, and as of January 2018, a total of 13 commercial CO 2 capture plants are currently in service around the world. MHI's CO 2 capture plant is applied to various combustion flue gases including heavy oil, coal, and natural gas, and the recovered CO 2 is used for a variety of applications including the enhancement of fertilizer/methanol production, general use such as for dry ice, and EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery) for the purpose of increasing oil production. Most notably, MHI delivered the world s largest CO 2 capture plant (4,776 metric tonnes per day) on a coal fired power plant to Petra Nova Parish Holdings LLC, U.S. at the end of December 2016. The project has been recognized by well-known publications including Power Engineering, Power Magazine, and Engineering News Record (ENR). MHI continues to promote research and development of CO 2 capture technology to improve the reliability, reduce the cost of future CO 2 capture plants, and increase the application of its technology. 1. Introduction to the CO 2 Opportunity CO 2 emissions have become a widely discussed subject in recent years because of the effect on the global climate. Understanding the global effort that would be necessary to combat climate change, the Paris Agreement, a new international framework aiming to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, was adopted at the Conference of the Parties to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP) in December 2015, and it entered into force in November 2016. Among the options available to reduce GHG emissions is CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS). CCS projects capture CO 2 emitted from the combustion of fossil fuels and stores it in the ground. A report issued in November 2016 by the International Energy Agency (IEA) titled 20 Years for Carbon Capture and Storage described the importance of CCS. In particular, the power generation sector, which produces the majority of CO 2 emissions, will require CCS to meet the emissions goals set out by the Paris Agreement. CO 2 can be used for a variety of economic purposes. CO 2 is widely used for general purposes such as carbonated beverages, dry ice for cooling, shielding gas for welding, and other miscellaneous uses. In the chemical industry, it is used as a raw material for the production of fertilizer, methanol, and other chemicals. In the oil industry, CO 2 can be used to increase oil production of mature oil fields while storing a large amount of CO 2. Recently, studies on CO 2 Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) have been actively undertaken by several companies and organizations. Regardless of how the CO 2 is ultimately used, MHI understands that the cost of CO 2 capture and the reliability of the technology must continue to be improved to support its wide deployment. Some of these cost reductions will come with experience, while the technology improvements will be engineered through R&D. *1 Chief Staff Manager, Chemical Research Department, Research & Innovation Center, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. *2 CO 2 -EOR Business Department, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engineering, Ltd. *3 Chemical Research Department, Research & Innovation Center, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. *4 Basic Engineering Department, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engineering, Ltd.

33 2. MHI's R&D and Commercial Experiences and Application of Recovered CO 2 MHI s CO 2 capture technology is known as the KM CDR Process and uses a proprietary solvent known as the KS-1 solvent. 1 This process can capture more than 90% of the CO 2 from a flue gas stream and produce CO 2 that is more than 99.9% pure. MHI s technology uses less steam than other conventional technologies. Figure 1 shows a schematic flow of the KM CDR Process and the process description. Figure 1 Flow of MHI s CO 2 capture process (KM CDR Process ) In 1991, MHI built its first CO 2 capture pilot plant at Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc. s Nanko Power Plant which burns natural gas. The Nanko Pilot Plant helped MHI to develop the KM CDR Process. To this day, MHI continues to use the 2 metric tonnes per day (tpd) pilot plant to improve the KM CDR Process and test new solvents. Through the pilot plant testing, MHI delivered its first commercial plant (with a capacity of 210 tpd) for a Malaysian fertilizer company in 1999. The captured CO 2 from a natural gas furnace increases urea production at the fertilizer plant, and the plant has been continuously operating for nearly 20 years. Since then, MHI has delivered an additional eleven (11) projects capturing CO 2 from natural gas sources. Most recently, the CO 2 capture plant for NIPPON EKITAN Corporation started commercial operation in November 2017. Just as important as capturing CO 2 from natural gas combustion, MHI has tailored the technology to capture CO 2 from coal fired flue gas. Coal fired flue gases have more impurities than natural gas-fired flue gases so separate pilot plant tests were necessary to enhance the KM CDR Process for coal fired power plants. These testing facilities include: - The R&D Pilot Plant (with a capacity of 1 tpd) at the MHI Research & Innovation Center - The Matsushima Pilot Plant (with a capacity of 10 tpd) at the Matsushima Thermal Power Station of Electric Power Development Co., Ltd. To commercialize the technology for coal fired power plants, MHI had to demonstrate the KM CDR Process on a larger scale, so in 2011, MHI started a long-term KM CDR Process demonstration at the James M. Barry Electric Generating Plant, owned by Alabama Power (a subsidiary of Southern Company). The demonstration facility was constructed with Southern Company, a major electric power company in the U.S., and the U.S. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). With a capacity of 500 tpd, this facility was the first large-scale demonstration on coal fired flue gas in the world.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 55 No. 1 (March 2018) 34 Following the demonstration, MHI was confident in its ability to deliver a commercial-scale CO2 capture plant for the Petra Nova Project. Given all of MHI s experiences (shown in Figure 2), it is believed that MHI is the leading provider of commercial-scale CO2 capture plants. Figure 2 MHI s experiences of R&D facilities and commercial plants 3. Completion of the world's largest CO2 capture plant In 2016, MHI successfully delivered a highly-reliable CO2 capture plant (with a capacity of 4,776 tpd) for the Petra Nova Project. The Petra Nova Project is jointly owned by NRG Energy Inc., a U.S. Independent Power Producer, and JX Nippon Oil & Gas Exploration Corporation. The plant started commercial operation at the end of December 2016. Table 1 details the plant specifications and Figure 3 is a photo of the completed plant. The CO2 captured from a 240 MW equivalent slipstream of flue gas is compressed by the CO2 compressor, transferred through a 130-km pipeline, and injected into an oil field. Through these efforts, it is expected that the oil production at the oil field will increase significantly from about 300 barrels per day when CO2 injection began. As of October 2017, the oil field production has increased to roughly 4,000 barrels per day.2 Table 1 Outline of CO2 capture plant for EOR project in Texas, U.S.A Item Plant location Plant owner Gas source Process Absorption liquid Plant scale CO2 recovery rate CO2 capture amount Description Thompsons (Texas, U.S.A) Petra Nova (joint venture between NRG Energy Inc. and JX Nippon Oil & Gas Exploration Corporation) NRG WA Parish power generation plant 610MW (Net) coal-fired power generation facility KM CDR Process KS-1 solvent Corresponding to 240MW 90 percent 4,776 metric tonnes per day Figure 3 Completed CO2 capture plant for EOR project in Texas, U.S.A

Figure 4 shows the facility configuration of this CO 2 capture plant and other related facilities. The CO 2 capture plant is located downstream of existing air quality control systems (AQCS) to limit the impurities in the flue gas. The electricity and steam required for the CO 2 capture plant are supplied from a cogeneration unit consisting of a gas combustion turbine connected to an electrical generator and a heat recovery steam generator. As a result, CO 2 can be recovered without decreasing the existing power generation output from the host unit or affecting how its power is dispatched to the power market. The world s largest eight-stage integrally-geared CO 2 compressor supplied by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Compressor Corporation is employed, and in the CO 2 compression process, a dehydrator is installed to meet the moisture specifications in the CO 2 pipeline. One major feature is that MHI designed the flue gas quencher and CO 2 absorber as rectangular towers. With rectangular shaped towers, MHI improved the efficiency of the construction work and shortened the construction time. MHI also implemented new systems into the KM CDR Process to further improve the technology. Three of the major improvements are: (1) Automatic load adjustment control system (2) Improved amine emission reduction system (3) Improved energy saving system 35 Figure 4 Facility configuration of CO 2 capture plant and related facilities for EOR project in Texas, U.S.A 3.1 Automatic load adjustment control system At a coal fired power plant, the operational load is adjusted according to the daily electric power demand. The boiler operation changes all the time, and with it, flue gas conditions such as flow rate and CO 2 concentration also change. MHI developed an automatic load adjustment control system for the CO 2 capture plant to maintain optimized operation following the dynamic flue gas condition of the host coal fired plant. This control system allows the CO 2 capture plant operator not to pay continuous attention to the CO 2 capture plant operation. Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8 show the operation trend using the automatic load adjustment control system. Even if the CO 2 concentration in the flue gas changes significantly, the desired CO 2 recovery ratio, capture amount, and steam consumption rate can be maintained. Figure 5 Trend of flue gas CO 2 concentration for EOR project in Texas, U.S.A

36 Figure 6 Trend of CO 2 capture amount for EOR project in Texas, U.S.A Figure 7 Trend of CO 2 recovery rate for EOR project in Texas, U.S.A Figure 8 Trend of steam consumption for EOR project in Texas, U.S.A 3.2 Improved amine emission reduction system The treated flue gas from the CO 2 absorber contains a small amount of amine, which is the main component of the absorption solvent. Coal fired flue gas contains many impurities. In particular, it is known that SO 3 among them increases amine emissions significantly even in low concentration according to MHI s experience at one of its commercial plants, the pilot plant test at the R&D center and the 500 tpd demonstration facility for coal fired flue gas. Therefore, MHI developed the improved amine emission reduction system to prevent the loss of solvent due to amine emissions. As can be seen from Figure 9, which shows the results at the 500 tpd demonstration facility, the improved system reduced amine emissions by over 90% compared with the conventional system. Figure 9 Relationship between SO 3 concentration and amine emission 3.3 Improved energy saving system MHI applied the improved energy saving system to reduce steam consumption by 5% compared with MHI s previous energy saving system. Among the CO 2 capture plants delivered by MHI, the improved energy saving system provides the best energy efficiency.

37 4. Latest R&D Updates 4.1 Development of new absorption solvent and process optimization In recent years, MHI has made efforts to develop a new absorption solvent which has the following attributes compared with KS-1 ; (1) similar steam consumption, (2) lower degradation and lower solvent consumption, and (3) lower amine emissions. Evaluation tests have been conducted at the Nanko Pilot Plant using new solvents. MHI confirmed that the steam consumption and amine emissions are within the desired range. The next step is to optimize the entire process, including the peripheral systems, and commercialize the new solvent in the near future. 4.2 Fully-automatic operational system Using the lessons learned from the development of the automatic load adjustment control system and the vast amount of operating data gathered from actual plants, MHI has been making efforts to develop a fully-automatic operational system. The objective is to reduce operating failures and operator work load during unstable conditions such as during startup or shutdown of the facility. This new system can be applied to both new and existing plants. 4.3 Cost reduction MHI is currently working on reducing capital and operating costs to help improve the economic viability of CO 2 capture projects for widespread deployment. By analyzing actual operating data and evaluating construction methods, MHI plans to identify areas for capital cost reduction. This could include optimizing equipment and facility design, evaluating equipment layouts to reduce the footprint of the facility, and modularizing the facility. In addition, MHI is evaluating further cost reduction by optimizing how the auxiliary facilities such as utility supply units are integrated with the CO 2 capture plant. 4.4 Deployment in other industrial fields Another area of interest for MHI is the use of its KM CDR Process for other applications. The gas conditions and compositions for these new uses will likely be different from those of fossil fuel-fired flue gas. Therefore, MHI needs to study and adjust the plant operating parameters to optimize performance before commercialization. 5. Conclusion MHI is the world leader in the deployment of CO 2 capture systems due to its consistent commitment to continual improvement. As a result of MHI s R&D efforts, the KM CDR Process is much more energy efficient and easier to operate than other conventional technologies. MHI has delivered 13 commercial CO 2 capture plants for the production of fertilizer, methanol, and oil, as well as for other general uses. Of particular note, MHI delivered the world s largest CO 2 capture plant on a coal fired power plant for the Petra Nova Project. MHI continues to research new ways to increase the reliability and economic efficiency of the technology so that it can support wide deployment, while helping to solve one of the world s greatest challenges. References 1. Kamijo, T. et al., Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration Test - Coal-fired Power Plant (in cooperation with Southern Company, a U.S. Electric Power Company), Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 50 No. 1 (2013) 2. Press release from Department of Energy https://energy.gov/fe/articles/doe-supported-petra-nova-captures-more-1-million-tons-co2