Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Similar documents
Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2017 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2016 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2016 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2017 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2016 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L ENRTF Work Plan (Main Document)

Black Spruce- Lowland. Tower Birch Clearcut-w/Reserves Adjacent 6/5/2019

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L Work Plan

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Bemidji Aspen Clearcut-Artificial Regen Cooperation 1/11/2019

Wet Soils Silviculture & Technology

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

Forest Health Program

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2017 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

A Characterization of Timber Salvage Operations on Public Forests in Minnesota and Wisconsin

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. Strategic Plan

Sustaining Northern Forests in the face of Climate Change

Talking Points on the Competitiveness of Minnesota s Primary Forest Products Industry

Assessing the Status of Land Snails in the Northeast Region

M.L Project Abstract For the Period Ending June 30, 2014

Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

From Buckthorn to Bioenergy: How Minnesota is Linking Habitat Restoration to Bioenergy and Local Economies

2015 Arkansas State Wildlife Grant Pre-proposal. Pine-oak Flatwoods Habitat Restoration to Benefit AWAP Species of Greatest Conservation Need

Proposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015

Chapter 1: Purpose and Need

Red Pine Management Guide A handbook to red pine management in the North Central Region

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP) New Generation in Water Supply Management-Pilot Studies

The State of Forestry in Minnesota (MN SAF Webinar)

Restoring The North Shore Forest. Welcome!

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

What to do with a 60 + year old unmanaged red pine stand?

Instructions for New Applicants to the Qualified Forest Program

Grassland and Freshwater Restoration GLOBE Intern

Managing Forests with EAB in Southwest Wisconsin. Patrick Dayton Stewardship Forester Greg Edge Area Forestry Leader

St. Louis County Land and Minerals Department 2018 SFI Forest Management Public Summary Report

8/5/2011. Lesson Overview. Disturbance/Fragmentation. Shifting Mosaic. Number one cause of biodiversity loss. Types of disturbance. - Scale, frequency

Transitioning black ash wetlands to an EAB infested future

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L LCCMR Work Plan

Grant Narrative for Forest Stewardship and Urban and Community Forestry Programs [State] Division of Forestry FY 2011

MISTIK MANAGEMENT LTD. FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN

2016 Annual Volunteer Report

Department of Conservation Division of Game and Fish A DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR MINNESOTA

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES STATE OF MICHIGAN TIMBER SALE PROSPECTUS #6282

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

MANITOBA ENVIROTHON WATER AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)

NDSU - North Dakota Forest Service North Dakota Cooperative Fire Protection Initiative Budget Request

Minnesota Forestry Research Notes Published by the Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul

Forest Products Specialist Report

Timber Harvesting Options for Woodland Owners

Release of RFP February 9, 2017 RFP Questions and Clarifications Deadline February 16, 2017 at 4 p.m.

Governor s Recommendation Overview. House Environment and Natural Resources Finance Division

Katahdin Forest Management 2016 SFI Summary Audit Report

ASSESSING THE DIRECTION OF THE FOREST RESOURCE

Secure Rural Schools Public Law Title II Project Submission Form USDA Forest Service

SHAREHOLDER FIREWOOD PROCEDURE

T h e F a c t s O n S h e e p E c o l o g y

Making a Plan for Your Woods

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, NEWBERRY MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

Forester - Forestry Department An Equal Opportunity Employer

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry M.S. 16A.125, Subd 5. Certification Report Forest Suspense Account 2017

C. Staffing Needs Approximately 150 staff days TSA #3 staff time will also be utilized.

WATER AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS

Transcription:

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP) Project Title: Testing a New Method for Eradicating Dwarf Mistletoe Category: D. Aquatic and Terrestrial Invasive Species ENRTF ID: 149D Total Project Budget: Proposed Project Time Period for the Funding Requested: Summary: 352,000 3 years, July 2018 to June 2021 This projects seeks to use new technology that gives natural resource managers another tool to maintain healthy and productive black spruce forests across Minnesota. Name: Matthew Russell Sponsoring Organization: U of MN Address: 1530 Cleveland Ave N, 115 Green Hall St. Paul Minn 55108 Telephone Number: (612) 6264280 Email russellm@umn.edu Web Address health.forestry.umn.edu Location Region: Northwest, Northeast County Name: Chippewa, Cook, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Roseau, St. Louis City / Township: Alternate Text for Visual: Mortality pocket caused by dwarf mistletoe in a black spruce stand in northern Minnesota spreads at a rate of 2.4 feet a year, causing mortality pockets of 2.25 acres over a rotation. Funding Priorities Multiple Benefits Outcomes Knowledge Base Extent of Impact Innovation Scientific/Tech Basis Urgency Capacity Readiness Leverage TOTAL % Page 1 of 6 07/29/2017 ENRTF ID: 149D

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) PROJECT TITLE: Testing a New Method for Eradicating Dwarf Mistletoe I. PROJECT STATEMENT Eastern spruce dwarf mistletoe (ESDM) is one of the most damaging pathogens of black spruce with up to 59% of stands infected in Minnesota. ESDM is a native pathogen that quickly kills black spruce, creating mortality pockets which can transition a forest stand into an open grassland or brushland. It is hypothesized that historically ESDM was partially controlled by severe stand replacing fires that were part of the natural disturbance dynamics. However, these fires are no longer typical or practical. New management tools must be developed which can balance the multiple ecosystem services which black spruce forests provide. Black spruce is an ecologically and economically important species. It is one of few species that can thrive on very wet, nutrient poor sites in Minnesota, filling an important ecological niche. Black spruce forests provide important wildlife habitat for several Species of Great Conservation Need, such as spruce grouse, and act as an important nutrient filter for water quality. Timber products from black spruce are an important component of northern Minnesota s rural economy with over 250,000 cords harvested annually across state, private, and federal lands. Partnering with forestry activities provides the only feasible way of restoring this habitat. Current management practices in black spruce infected with ESDM call for a clearcut harvest with the removal of all residual trees greater than 5 feet in height. This, however, is not adequate, because any infected residuals that remain after a harvest will continue to spread the pathogen and will quickly kill the regenerating trees. Spread from each infected residual over the next 90 years will lead to the loss of at least 2.25 acres of habitat (and timber). Treatment to remove residuals is done by a contractor using a bulldozer with a brush clearing (KG) blade. However, this piece of equipment is rare (only 3 in northern Minnesota), heavy (must have frozen ground), and is inefficient in treating individual stands. These factors result in few stands being treated, which means residual infected black spruce remain on the site, and ultimately the site may convert to grass or brush. This project will test and evaluate a new technology, a track loader with a brush cutting head or a mulching head (see figure), to eradicate ESDM in infected residual black spruce. Track loaders have a few benefits over the traditional KG blade treatments, namely that (1) they are numerous, (2) they are light and faster and are able to operate on snow and unfrozen ground, and (3) are an important tool during warmer winters. The overarching goal of this project to test the effectiveness and efficiency of this new technology (the track loader) compared to traditional KG implementation. This will give natural resource managers another tool to maintain healthy and productive black spruce forests. II. PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND OUTCOMES Activity 1. Develop GPS tracking/guidance and protocols for use in the trackloader. Budget 60,000 Currently, an entire stand is treated after harvest because the mistletoe location is not known. We will develop programming for a portable GPS device, which can be temporarily installed in a track loader. This device will display the machine location, as well as the area to be treated. The operator will be able to see the path, and avoid missing spots within the treatment area, much like a farmer using precision agriculture equipment. Such equipment has not been developed for forestry work. The application need not be as complicated, as a human will always operate the machine. In addition to reducing the area to be treated and treatment costs, we anticipate a reduction in the cost and effort of administering the contract. Upon completion of the project the GPS unit and programming will be given to DNR Forestry in Littlefork. 1 Page 2 of 6 07/29/2017 ENRTF ID: 149D

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) Outcome Completion Date 1. Selection of GPS unit/bracket August 1 2018 2. GPS programming, field testing December 1 2018 Activity 2. Assessment of track loader efficiency and effectiveness compared to a KG blade. Budget 292,000 Working with DNR and County foresters, we will identify 20 stands with ESDM on state or county land that are scheduled for treatment. Half of the stands will be treated with traditional methods (KG blade) and half will be treated with the track loader. Our field crew will traverse each stand at 200yard intervals recording mistletoe locations with the GPS. This information will be used to simulate mistletoe impacts in the current stand, and in the next stand, providing information on the economic impacts of ESDM and the return on investments of eradication. We will then work with DNR Forestry to contract for a track loader with a brushcutting or mulching head. We are budgeting 200/acre, and, at the scale of this project, we can treat 75 acres per year. We will spread this over as many stands as are available. This will give an adequate indication of the effectiveness of the equipment over a wide variety of stand, snow and other operating conditions. Finally, to evaluate treatment effectiveness we will measure if the machine covered the entire infested area, and if the machine killed the infected residuals. To evaluate machine coverage, we will examine the correspondence between the GPS path of the machine and the treatment area and calculate the percentage of area covered and the number of areas missed per treated acre. Economic assessment will compare the cost of treatment with the value of the timber saved. Outcome Completion Date 1. Identify ESDM infected stands December 1 2018 2. Complete surveys of infested stands January 1 2019 3. Contract for track loader treatments February 1 2020 4. Assessment of treatment and economics May 1 2020 III. PROJECT STRATEGY A. Project Team/Partners Dr. Matthew Russell, University of Minnesota Forest Resources, will lead the project and contribute expertise in forest health assessments and monitoring. Dr. Marcella WindmullerCampione, University of Minnesota Forest Resources department, will assist in silvicultural implications. Dr. Fred Baker, University of Minnesota Forest Resources department, will train the crew and provide overall guidance with mistletoe and simulation modeling. He will also coordinate with Harold Thistle, USDA Forest Service Forest Protection Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, to develop the GPS system. The University of Minnesota will receive the funding. B. Project Impact and LongTerm Strategy This project will provide information that can be used to evaluate the economics of investments in management of ESDM. It will also provide a thorough examination of the feasibility and effectiveness of potentially useful treatment which foresters have never had. Assessment of this technology can open the door for many more acres of black spruce to be successfully treated after harvest and allow for a wider range of silvicultural treatments to be implemented in black spruce stands (more than just clearcuts). C. Timeline Requirements For this project, we are requesting three years since access to the stands is weather dependent, frequently possible only when the ground is frozen (Late December midmarch). 2 Page 3 of 6 07/29/2017 ENRTF ID: 149D

2018 Detailed Project Budget IV. TOTAL ENRTF REQUEST BUDGET two years BUDGET ITEM Personnel: Dr. Matthew Russell, University of Minnesota (66.5% salary, 33.5% benefits); 4% FTE each year for 2 years summer salary Dr. Marcella WindmullerCampione, University of Minnesota (66.5% salary, 33.5% benefits); 4% FTE each year for 2 years summer salary UMN 1 graduate research assistants to collect, analyze, and evaluate data. Salary and fringe (0.82) for 2 years each (0.5 FTE) UMN Research associate coordinating collection of vegetation and forest health data; Salary and fringe (0.214) for 2 years (0.75 FTE) 1 UMN undergraduate work study students to assist with summer data collection and processing. Salary and fringe (0.077) for 2 years (.25 FTE) Professional/Technical/Service Contracts: Fred Baker Training, simulation modelling, field supervisor Trackloader contract 30,000, with RFP. Development of GPS, software Equipment/Tools/Supplies: Forest inventory equipment and supplies handheld gps unit, measuring tapes, flagging, snowshoes, clalipers, and pin flags Travel: Estimate of 7,500 per year for 2 years since sites are remote and difficult to access. This includes costs of rental vehicle from UMN fleet services, per diem, and housing Instate conference registration, travel, and per diem to present results from study during the study 500 each year (2 years) Additional Budget Items: TOTAL ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND REQUEST = AMOUNT N/A 17,845 17,714 122,419 104,222 16,800 10,000 30,000 7,000 2,500 22,500 1,000 352,000 V. OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF FUNDS AMOUNT Status Other NonState To Be Applied To Project During Project Period: USDA Forest Service STDP Project 93,849 Pending Other State To Be Applied To Project During Project Period: N/A N/A Inkind Services To Be Applied To Project During Project Period: Fred Baker will donate an additional 15 days at 400/day to the project. 6,000 Secured Unrecovered indirect costs@ 54% (2018, 2019) of total direct cost 668,003 190,080 Secured Funding History: N/A N/A Remaining From Current ENRTF Appropriation: N/A N/A Page 4 of 6 07/29/2017 ENRTF ID: 149D

Testing a New Method for Eradicating Dwarf Mistletoe Mortality pocket caused by Dwarf Mistletoe in a black spruce stand in northern MN spreads at a rate of 2.4 feet a year, causing mortality pockets of 2.25 acres over a rotation. Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) Traditional treatment: bulldozer with KG blade heavy, inefficient, and not widely available New Treatment: track loader with brush cutting head efficient, can be used under wider conditions, readily available Can new technology help maintain healthy and productive black spruce forests? Page 5 of 6 07/29/2017 ENRTF ID: 149D

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) PROJECT MANAGER QUALIFICATIONS AND ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION Project Manager: Affiliation: Title: Contact: Qualifications: Organization: Matthew B. Russell Department of Forest Resources, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota Assistant Professor/Extension Specialist 1530 Cleveland Ave. N St. Paul, MN 55108 6126264280 (ph) russellm@umn.edu Matthew Russell has a Ph.D. in forest resources from the University of Maine, an M.S. in forestry from Virginia Tech, and a B.S. in forestry from Paul Smith s College. He specializes in forest ecosystem health and is the team lead for the Forest Ecosystem Health program in the University of Minnesota s Extension Center for Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. His research and Extension interests focus on managing natural resources in the face of environmental changes. From 20082012, he was Forest Data Manager for the US Forest Service Penobscot Experimental Forest, a longterm experiment focused on evaluating the ecological and environmental impacts of varying forest management techniques. From 20082009 he was Forest Data Manager for the Cooperative Forestry Research Unit, a forest industryuniversity research cooperative established at the University of Maine. He is an active member of the Society of American Foresters and Forest Products Society. The mission of the Department of Forest Resources located at the University of Minnesota is to advance the science and management of forests and related natural resources, develop future leaders in forest and natural resource management through undergraduate and graduate education, and to serve citizens through outreach. Page 6 of 6 07/29/2017 ENRTF ID: 149D