Traditional agricultural practices and the sex ratio today

Similar documents
Low-skill labor-intensive tradables. equipment

Diego Restuccia. University of Toronto and NBER

APPENDIX C Questions from Hofstede s survey used to identify individualism (source Exhibit 5.11 in Hofstede (2001)):

Rwanda s Agricultural Productivity Gaps

Genetic Diversity and Comparative Development

Reallocation and Productivity

4 th Stakeholder Plenary Meeting from feedstocks to finance upscaling sustainable biofuels. Implementation of sustainability regulations in the EU

Economic Diversification in Low Income Countries (LICs): Stylized Facts and Macroeconomic Implications

Appendix NOT FOR PUBLICATION. Geographic dominance in coding technologies

Ricardo Hausmann and César A. Hidalgo WEBPUBLICATIONS 74

Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action

Human Capital and Income Inequality: Some Facts and Some Puzzles *

OECD experience with strenghthening fiscal capacities for subnational public investment

Intensive and Extensive Land Supply Response to Agricultural Crop Prices. Zabid Iqbal. December 6, 2017

Geography and Agricultural Productivity: Cross-Country Evidence from Micro Plot-Level Data

Agriculture and land tenure

Changing patterns in the international movement of crop genetic material: An analysis of global policy drivers and potential consequences

A Western Reversal Since the Neolithic? The Long-Run Impact of Early Agriculture

HAS SUSTAINED GROWTH DECOUPLED FROM INDUSTRIALIZATION? Dani Rodrik February 2014

Specialization, Economic Development and Aggregate Productivity Differences

Is Innovation the Premise of Social Progress?

The Agricultural Origins of Time Preference Online Appendix

LINKAGES AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Geography and Agricultural Productivity: Cross-Country Evidence from Micro Plot-Level Data

COUNTRY CLASSIFICATION 2017 AS OF 19 JULY 2017

The African Manufacturing Malaise: Nature and Determinants

COUNTRY CLASSIFICATION 2013 AS OF 20 JULY 2013

I M F S T A F F D I S C U S S I O N N O T E. Economic Diversification in LICs: Stylized Facts and Macroeconomic Implications

Urbanization in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)

Agricultural Transition and the Adoption of Primitive Technology. James B. ANG. 29 October 2014 EGC Report No: 2014/12

Risky Agriculture, Farm Earnings, and Development

CARBON EMISSIONS AND INCOME INEQUALITY

Diversifying Uzbekistan

Understanding Productivity Differences

Vertical and Horizontal Dynamics in Export Unit Values

Product Complexity and Economic Development

World Development Report 2008 Agriculture for Development Outline of presentation I. WDR storyline

MAKING GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS WORK FOR DEVELOPMENT

Chapter 2. Evaluation Highlights

Structural Change and Economic Dynamics

World Development Report 2008 Agriculture for Development

GLOBALIZATION, STRUCTURAL CHANGE, AND PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH BY MCMILLAN AND RODRIK. Comments: Bill Maloney

1. How is the world distribution of income evolving? 2. Do countries converge to steady state paths and, if so, how quickly?

Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting Out the Causality *

Technology Differences Over Space and Time. Francesco Caselli

Does complexity explain the structure of commodity trade?

The Distribution of Environmental Damages

Exporting for growth: identifying leading sectors for Egypt

Social Ins+tu+ons and Economic Development

Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting Out the Causality *

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES PARTICIPATION IN GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS IMPLICATIONS FOR TRADE AND TRADE- RELATED POLICIES SELECTED PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Impact of India s Food Security Policy across Household Types

A Conceptual Framework for Export Diversification and Sustainable Growth Part I. Inclusive Growth Course Vandana Chandra October 27, 2010

Specialization, Agriculture, and Cross-Country Productivity Differences

INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS OF A POWER-TO-X ROADMAP

Germs, Social Networks and Growth

John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Faculty Research Working Papers Series

Discussion of The Life-Cycle Growth of Plants in Colombia: Fundamentals vs. Distortions, by Marcela Eslava and John Haltiwanger

TRADE, SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT

In many developing countries, unofficial economic activity that conducted. The Unofficial Economy and Economic Development

16.A. Construction of the Protection Data Base. Betina V. Dimaranan. 16.A.1 Overview

Construction subsystem and carbon dioxide emissions 1

Source: WHO. Note: ARI = acute respiratory infections.

Structural Change, Misallocation, and Aggregate Productivity

Cross-Country Differences in the Quality of Human. Capital

Session 5. Analysis of NTMs. NTMs Data and descriptive statistics

Urbanization and Health: challenges and promises

Niche Firms, Mass Markets, and Income Across Countries: Accounting for the Impact of Entry Costs. Pedro Bento

Global Fossil-fuel Subsidies and Emission Externalities: Inclusive Approaches to Welfare Assessment

OECD INTER-COUNTRY INPUT-OUTPUT DATA AND EMBODIED CO2 EMISSIONS

Growth Econometrics. Steven N. Durlauf Paul A. Johnson Jonathan R. W. Temple. Working Paper No. 61. October 22, 2004

Machinery, Electronics, and Chemical Sector Potential

The Service Revolution

Landscape of NTMs for Environmental Goods

Keywords: employment protection, unemployment, informality, transition and emerging economies. Source: Based on Figure 1. Cons

Why Bother? What Matters? If we have data, let s look at data. If all we have are opinions, let s go with mine - Jim Barksdale, former CEO of Netscape

Anticipating and Responding to Changing Skill Needs

GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS AND TRADE IN VALUE ADDED: THE NEED FOR NEW POLICY THINKING

GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS AND TRADE IN VALUE ADDED: THE NEED FOR NEW POLICY THINKING

Agro food global value chains

Policy Performance and Governance Capacities in the OECD

Placing Strategic Bets to Become Competitive

Looking Beyond Petroleum

FIW Working Paper N 2 May Producer Services, Manufacturing Linkages, and Trade* Joseph Francois and Julia Wörz. Abstract

ICT AND DEMAND FOR LABOUR: DOES AGE MATTER?

The Geography of NGO Activism against Multinational Corporations

Development Economics: Microeconomic issues and Policy Models

Few Avenues to Diversification

FDI Spillovers and High-Growth Firms in Developing Countries

POLICY SPACE IN AGRICULTURAL MARKETS

Is Informal Normal? Towards More and Better Jobs in Developing Countries

Environmental sustainability and decent work

Measuring Progress towards Green Growth through indicators. OECD work. UNCEEA Sixth meeting New York, June 2011

Questions Scoring Traffic light. 1. Primary legislation 1.1 Does a legal framework for renewable energy development exist?

C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics

Modern Economic Growth Theories and the Miracle of the East Asian Tigers

Year OneGeology CONSORTIUM MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT. between

THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK IN ICELAND. Douglas Sutherland, Economics Department OECD 13 January 2016, Reykjavik

MPDD Seminar Series 6 October 2011, ESCAP Productive Capacities in Asia and the Pacific

TRUST -- PUBLIC SECTOR INTEGRITY AND LOBBYING

Transcription:

Supplementary Material for Traditional agricultural practices and the sex ratio today Alberto Alesina 1,2, Paola Giuliano 3,2, *, Nathan Nunn 1,2 1 Harvard University. 2 NBER. 3 UCLA. *Correspondence to: paola.giuliano@anderson.ucla.edu The Supplementary Material provides details on the data sources and the robustness of the analysis for the results derived in the paper. Additional details on the Ethnographic Atlas The Ethnographic Atlas was constructed by George Peter Murdock. It contains ethnographic information for 1,265 ethnic groups worldwide. The period in which the information was collected varies by ethnicity, with the earliest observation dates coming from ethnicities in the Old World (where early written evidence is available) and the most recent information dating around the 20 th century, for those parts of the world without a written history and directly observed by anthropologists. All societies are observed prior to industrialization. In total, 23 ethnicities are observed during the 17 th century or earlier, 16 during the 18 th century, 310 during the 19 th century, 876 between 1900 and 1950, and 31 after 1950. For nine ethnicities, an exact year is not provided. The variable v39 classifies each ethnic group as being in one of the following three categories: (1) the plough was absent, (2) the plough existed at the time the group was observed, but it was not aboriginal, and (3) the plough was aboriginal, having existed prior to contact. Using this information, we construct an indicator variable that equals one if the plough was ever adopted

during the pre-industrial period (whether aboriginal or not) and zero otherwise. Of the 1,156 ethnicities for which information exists, for 997 the plough was absent, for 141 the plough was adopted (and aboriginal), and for 18 it was adopted, but after European contact. Of these, almost all are Native American groups who today are either extinct or are very small and comprise a negligible proportion of the population of countries today. The exceptions are the Swazi, Sotho, and Xhosa, all from the Southern part of Africa and the Aymara who live in Bolivia today. After our data construction procedure, there are only four countries with non-trivial proportions of the population whose ancestors adopted the plough after European contact. These are Swaziland (99.9%), Lesotho (97.3%), Bolivia (30.55%) and South Africa (23%). We report in S2 and S3 Tables the robustness of the results to the exclusion of the four countries where a large proportion of the population adopted the plough after European contact, and the twenty-one for which there is any proportion of the population for which the plough was not aboriginal. The results are more precisely estimated when compared to the full sample. 2

Table A. Sex ratio ancestral plough use, robustness to Conley standard errors. (1) (2) (3) (4) Sex ratio at birth Sex ratio under age 1 Sex ratio age 0 to 4 Sex ratio age 5 to 14 Mean (std. dev.) of sex ratio 104.8 (1.45) 103.7 (1.91) 103.6 (1.99) 103.2 (2.36) Ancestral plough use 0.664* 1.040*** 1.194*** 1.744*** (0.337) (0.386) (0.414) (0.509) Conley st. err. (window=5 degrees) [0.292] [0.355] [0.381] [0.487] Conley st. err. (window=20 degrees) [0.297] [0.344] [0.367] [0.440] Conley st. err. (window=25th perc. gen. dist.) {0.458} {0.495} {0.502} {0.470} Conley st. err. (window=50th perc. gen. dist.) {0.450} {0.521} {0.544} {0.535} Conley st. err. (window=75th perc. gen. dist.) {0.414} {0.465} {0.489} {0.462} Continent fixed effects yes yes yes yes Mean (std. dev.) of ancestral plough use 0.63 (0.44) 0.63 (0.44) 0.63 (0.44) 0.63 (0.44) Observations 153 153 153 153 R-squared 0.509 0.623 0.613 0.577 Ancestral plough use 0.741 1.742*** 1.912*** 3.012*** (0.498) (0.604) (0.644) (0.851) Conley st. err. (window=5 degrees) [0.476] [0.570] [0.616] [0.807] Conley st. err. (window=20 degrees) [0.483] [0.582] [0.634] [0.829] Conley st. err. (window=25th perc. gen. dist.) {0.684} {0.751} {0.759} {0.720} Conley st. err. (window=50th perc. gen. dist.) {0.638} {0.644} {0.652} {0.587} Conley st. err. (window=75th perc. gen. dist.) {0.632} {0.638} {0.642} {0.593} Continent fixed effects yes yes yes yes Mean (std. dev.) of ancestral plough use 0.63 (0.45) 0.63 (0.45) 0.63 (0.45) 0.63 (0.45) Observations 152 152 152 152 R-squared 0.506 0.612 0.601 0.555 Notes : The unit of observation is a country. Coefficients are reported with robust standard errors in parenthesis. Ancestral plough use is the estimated proportion of citizens with ancestors that used the plough in pre-industrial agriculture. The variable ranges from 0 to 1. The dependent variables are the number of boys of a given age range per 100 girls, for the 1960-2009 period. Conley-Standard Errors based on geographic distance are indicated with squaredbrackets (5 and 20 degrees). Conley-Standard Errors based on genetic distance are indicated with curly brackets (based on 25, 50 and 75 percentile of genetic distance) ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels. 3

Table B. Sex ratio and ancestral plough use, robustness to the exclusion of countries with a large fraction of the population with non-aboriginal plough use (Swaziland, Lesotho, Bolivia and South Africa). (1) (2) (3) (4) Sex ratio at birth Sex ratio under age 1 Sex ratio age 0 to 4 Sex ratio age 5 to 14 Mean (std. dev.) of sex ratio 104.9 (1.44) 103.7 (1.92) 103.6 (1.99) 103.2 (2.37) Ancestral plough use 0.954*** 1.341*** 1.497*** 2.072*** (0.318) (0.369) (0.398) (0.501) Observations 149 149 149 149 R-squared 0.515 0.628 0.618 0.584 Ancestral plough use 0.940* 2.008*** 2.163*** 3.235*** (0.504) (0.616) (0.661) (0.896) Plough-positive environment 0.712*** 0.712*** 0.712*** 0.712*** (0.085) (0.085) (0.085) (0.085) Plough-negative environment 0.209 0.209 0.209 0.209 (0.165) (0.165) (0.165) (0.165) F -statistic (environment instruments) 41.82 41.82 41.82 41.82 World Bank region fixed effects yes yes yes yes Mean (std. dev.) of ancestral plough use 0.63 (0.45) 0.63 (0.45) 0.63 (0.45) 0.63 (0.45) Observations 148 148 148 148 R-squared 0.513 0.619 0.609 0.567 Notes : The unit of observation is a country. Coefficients are reported with robust standard errors in parenthesis. Ancestral plough use is the estimated proportion of citizens with ancestors that used the plough in pre-industrial agriculture. The variable ranges from 0 to 1. The dependent variables are the number of boys of a given age range per 100 girls, for the 1960-2009 period. The regressions include the historical and contemporary controls used in Table 1. The instruments comprise two variables: one mesauring the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-positive crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing barley, rye and wheat divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops) and the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-negative crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing foxtail millet, pearl millet and sorghum divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops). ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels. 4

Table C. Sex ratio and ancestral plough use, robustness to the exclusion of 21 countries with any fraction of the population with of non-aboriginal plough use. (1) (2) (3) (4) Sex ratio at birth Sex ratio under age 1 Sex ratio age 0 to 4 Sex ratio age 5 to 14 Mean (std. dev.) of sex ratio 105 (1.43) 103.9 (1.88) 103.7 (1.94) 103.4 (2.30) Ancestral plough use 1.063*** 1.481*** 1.660*** 2.298*** (0.330) (0.380) (0.408) (0.498) Observations 132 132 132 132 R-squared 0.507 0.636 0.632 0.609 Ancestral plough use 1.248** 2.286*** 2.425*** 3.396*** (0.504) (0.628) (0.664) (0.820) Plough-positive environment 0.727*** 0.727*** 0.727*** 0.727*** (0.089) (0.089) (0.089) (0.089) Plough-negative environment 0.191 0.191 0.191 0.191 (0.169) (0.169) (0.169) (0.169) F -statistic (environment instruments) 40.9 40.9 40.9 40.9 World Bank region fixed effects yes yes yes yes Mean (std. dev.) of ancestral plough use 0.64 (0.45) 0.64 (0.45) 0.64 (0.45) 0.64 (0.45) Observations 131 131 131 131 R-squared 0.504 0.622 0.619 0.592 Notes : The unit of observation is a country. Coefficients are reported with robust standard errors in parenthesis. Ancestral plough use is the estimated proportion of citizens with ancestors that used the plough in pre-industrial agriculture. The variable ranges from 0 to 1. The dependent variables are the number of boys of a given age range per 100 girls, for the 1960-2009 period. The regressions include the historical and contemporary controls used in Table 1. The instruments comprise two variables: one mesauring the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-positive crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing barley, rye and wheat divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops) and the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-negative crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing foxtail millet, pearl millet and sorghum divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops). ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels. 5

Table D. Sex ratio between ages 0 and 4 and ancestral plough use. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Dependent variable: Sex ratio age 0 to 4 1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2009 1960-2009 (pooled) 1960-2009 (average) Mean (std. dev.) of dependent variable 102.6 (2.49) 102.9 (2.03) 103.2 (2.07) 103.7 (2.10) 104.1 (2.24) 103.4 (2.25) 103.6 (1.99) Ancestral plough use 1.527** 1.424*** 1.268*** 1.155*** 1.232** 1.329*** 1.194*** (0.744) (0.503) (0.475) (0.378) (0.514) (0.441) (0.414) Observations 128 144 131 153 153 709 153 R-squared 0.506 0.563 0.616 0.639 0.490 0.567 0.613 Panel B: Second stage of 2SLS estimanes Ancestral plough use 2.384** 1.917*** 2.106*** 1.371** 1.816** 1.881*** 1.912*** (1.001) (0.703) (0.739) (0.541) (0.801) (0.650) (0.644) Plough-positive environment 0.733*** 0.760*** 0.718*** 0.719*** 0.697*** 0.728*** 0.741*** (0.089) (0.091) (0.091) (0.086) (0.086) (0.038) (0.088) Plough-negative environment 0.422** 0.284 0.412** 0.327* 0.254 0.337*** 0.258 (0.187) (0.176) (0.187) (0.169) (0.166) (0.074) (0.172) F -statistic (environment instruments) 36.95 39.91 34.45 39.1 37.86 208.98 42.03 Continent fixed effects yes yes yes yes yes yes yes Mean (std. dev.) of ancestral plough use 0.58 (0.45) 0.61 (0.45) 0.59 (0.45) 0.63 (0.44) 0.63 (0.44) 0.61 (0.45) 0.63 (0.44) Observations 127 143 130 152 152 704 152 R-squared 0.491 0.553 0.601 0.636 0.486 0.560 0.601 Notes : The unit of observation is a country. Coefficients are reported with robust standard errors in parenthesis. Ancestral plough use is the estimated proportion of citizens with ancestors that used the plough in pre-industrial agriculture. The variable ranges from 0 to 1. The dependent variables are the number of boys of a given age range per 100 girls, for the 1960-2009 period. The regressions include the historical and contemporary controls used in Table 1. The instruments comprise two variables: one mesauring the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-positive crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing barley, rye and wheat divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops) and the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-negative crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing foxtail millet, pearl millet and sorghum divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops). ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels. 6

Table E. Sex ratio between ages 5 and 14 and ancestral plough use. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Dependent variable: Sex ratio age 5 to 14 1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2009 1960-2009 (pooled) 1960-2009 (average) Mean (std. dev.) of dependent variable 102.2 (3.37) 102.7 (2.96) 102.8 (2.54) 103.2 (2.17) 103.8 (2.39) 103 (2.74) 103.2 (2.36) Ancestral plough use 2.370** 2.104*** 1.803*** 1.796*** 1.533*** 1.904*** 1.744*** (1.043) (0.770) (0.660) (0.412) (0.464) (0.540) (0.509) Observations 128 144 131 153 153 709 153 R-squared 0.496 0.472 0.521 0.621 0.544 0.512 0.577 Ancestral plough use 3.817** 2.895*** 3.235*** 2.768*** 1.665** 2.877*** 3.012*** (1.496) (1.050) (1.094) (0.706) (0.792) (0.841) (0.851) Plough-positive environment 0.733*** 0.760*** 0.718*** 0.719*** 0.697*** 0.728*** 0.741*** (0.089) (0.091) (0.091) (0.086) (0.086) (0.038) (0.088) Plough-negative environment 0.422** 0.284 0.412** 0.327* 0.254 0.337*** 0.258 (0.187) (0.176) (0.187) (0.169) (0.166) (0.074) (0.172) F -statistic (environment instruments) 36.95 39.91 34.45 39.1 37.86 208.98 42.03 Continent fixed effects yes yes yes yes yes yes yes Mean (std. dev.) of ancestral plough use 0.58 (0.45) 0.61 (0.45) 0.59 (0.45) 0.63 (0.44) 0.63 (0.44) 0.63 (0.44) 0.63 (0.44) Observations 127 143 130 152 152 704 152 R-squared 0.480 0.464 0.495 0.604 0.540 0.499 0.555 Notes : The unit of observation is a country. Coefficients are reported with robust standard errors in parenthesis. Ancestral plough use is the estimated proportion of citizens with ancestors that used the plough in pre-industrial agriculture. The variable ranges from 0 to 1. The dependent variables are the number of boys of a given age range per 100 girls, for the 1960-2009 period. The regressions include the historical and contemporary controls used in Table 1. The instruments comprise two variables: one mesauring the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-positive crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing barley, rye and wheat divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops) and the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-negative crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing foxtail millet, pearl millet and sorghum divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops). ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels. 7

Table F. Sex ratio and ancestral plough use, excluding Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, North and South America. (1) (2) (3) (4) Sex ratio at birth Sex ratio under age 1 Sex ratio age 0 to 4 Sex ratio age 5 to 14 Mean (std. dev.) of sex ratio 104.8 (1.58) 103.7 (2.09) 103.5 (2.17) 103.1 (2.56) Ancestral plough use 0.849* 1.235** 1.388** 1.849*** (0.439) (0.495) (0.532) (0.652) Observations 125 125 125 125 R-squared 0.519 0.628 0.616 0.575 Ancestral plough use 1.023 2.424*** 2.587*** 3.448*** (0.718) (0.891) (0.942) (1.196) Plough-positive environment 0.653*** 0.653*** 0.653*** 0.653*** (0.101) (0.101) (0.101) (0.101) Plough-negative environment -0.061-0.061-0.061-0.061 (0.205) (0.205) (0.205) (0.205) F -statistic (environment instruments) 28.71 28.71 28.71 28.71 World Bank region fixed effects yes yes yes yes Mean (std. dev.) of ancestral plough use 0.61 (0.47) 0.61 (0.47) 0.61 (0.47) 0.61 (0.47) Observations 124 124 124 124 R-squared 0.514 0.605 0.594 0.548 Notes : The unit of observation is a country. Coefficients are reported with robust standard errors in parenthesis. Ancestral plough use is the estimated proportion of citizens with ancestors that used the plough in pre-industrial agriculture. The variable ranges from 0 to 1. The dependent variables are the number of boys of a given age range per 100 girls, for the 1960-2009 period. The regressions include the historical and contemporary controls used in Table 1. The instruments comprise two variables: one mesauring the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-positive crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing barley, rye and wheat divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops) and the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-negative crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing foxtail millet, pearl millet and sorghum divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops). ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels. 8

Table G. Sex ratio and ancestral plough use, including a dummy for Sub-Saharan Africa. (1) (2) (3) (4) Sex ratio at birth Sex ratio under age 1 Sex ratio age 0 to 4 Sex ratio age 5 to 14 Mean (std. dev.) of sex ratio 104.8 (1.44) 103.7 (1.90) 103.5 (1.98) 103.2 (2.35) Ancestral plough use 0.503 0.813** 0.971** 1.456*** (0.353) (0.381) (0.415) (0.486) Observations 153 153 153 153 R-squared 0.516 0.632 0.621 0.587 Ancestral plough use 0.384 1.372** 1.559** 2.654*** (0.566) (0.660) (0.698) (0.911) Plough-positive environment 0.711*** 0.711*** 0.711*** 0.711*** (0.089) (0.089) (0.089) (0.089) Plough-negative environment 0.328* 0.328* 0.328* 0.328* (0.177) (0.177) (0.177) (0.177) F -statistic (environment instruments) 33.66 33.66 33.66 33.66 World Bank region fixed effects yes yes yes yes Mean (std. dev.) of ancestral plough use 0.63 (0.45) 0.63 (0.45) 0.63 (0.45) 0.63 (0.45) Observations 152 152 152 152 R-squared 0.514 0.625 0.613 0.568 Notes : The unit of observation is a country. Coefficients are reported with robust standard errors in parenthesis. Ancestral plough use is the estimated proportion of citizens with ancestors that used the plough in pre-industrial agriculture. The variable ranges from 0 to 1. The dependent variables are the number of boys of a given age range per 100 girls, for the 1960-2009 period. The regressions include the historical and contemporary controls used in Table 1. The instruments comprise two variables: one mesauring the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-positive crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing barley, rye and wheat divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops) and the ancestral suitability of the environment for plough-negative crops (the average fraction of ancestral land that was suitable for growing foxtail millet, pearl millet and sorghum divided by the fraction that was suitable for any crops). ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels. 9

Table H. Sex ratio and ancestral plough use, list of countries included in Table 1. AFRICA ASIA EUROPE NORTH AMERICA SOUTH AMERICA OCEANIA AGO MDG AFG OMN ALB PRT CAN ARG AUS BDI MLI ARE PAK AUT RUS CRI BOL NZL BEN MOZ BGD PHL BEL SVK CUB BRA BFA MRT BHR PRK BGR SVN DOM CHL BWA MUS CHN QAT BIH SWE GTM COL CAF MWI GEO SAU BLR UKR HND ECU CIV NAM GRC SGP CHE YUG HTI PER CMR NER IDN SYR CZE JAM PRY COG NGA IND THA DEU MEX URY COM REU IRN TJK DNK NIC VEN CPV RWA IRQ TKM ESP PAN DJI SDN ISR TUR EST PRI DZA SEN JOR UZB FIN SLV EGY SLE JPN VNM FRA TTO ETH SOM KAZ YEM GBR USA GAB STP KGZ HRV GHA SWZ KHM HUN GIN SYC KOR IRL GMB TCD KWT ITA GNB TGO LAO LTU GNQ TUN LBN LVA KEN TZA LKA MDA LBR UGA MMR MKD LBY ZAF MNG NLD LSO ZMB MYS NOR MAR ZWE NPL POL 10