Advanced Coal Power Plant Water Usage

Similar documents
Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

Power Plant Water Usage and Loss

Advanced Coal Technology 101

Fossil Energy. Fossil Energy Technologies. Chapter 12, #1. Access (clean HH fuel) Coal. Air quality (outdoor)

Performance Evaluation of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle Coal Gasification Plant

BLUE OPTION White space is filled with one or more photos

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

Available online at Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010)

CO 2. Capture: Comparison of Cost & Performance of Gasification and Combustion-based Plants

Perspective on Coal Utilization Technology

IGCC: Coal s Pathway to the Future

Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study

sco 2 Cycle as an Efficiency Improvement Opportunity for Air-Fired Coal Combustion

Flexible Integration of the sco 2 Allam Cycle with Coal Gasification for Low-Cost, Emission-Free Electricity Generation

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 180B CARBON CAPTURE FROM COAL FIRED POWER GENERATION (DECEMBER 2008 REPUBLISHED MARCH 2009)

Ronald L. Schoff Parsons Corporation George Booras Electric Power Research Institute

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal Technologies & Future Projects Presented to. David Butler Executive Director

EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE FOSSIL CYCLES INCORPORATING CO 2 REMOVAL

Carbon Capture Options for LNG Liquefaction

Status and Outlook for CO 2 Capture Systems

Scott Hume. Electric Power Research Institute, 1300 West WT Harris Blvd, Charlotte NC 28262

The Future of IGCC Technology CCPC-EPRI IGCC Roadmap Results

Impact of novel PCC solvents on existing and new Australian coal-fired power plants 1 st PCC Conference, Abu-Dhabi

Focus on Gasification in the Western U.S.

CO 2 Capture: Impacts on IGCC Plant Performance in a High Elevation Application using Western Sub-Bituminous Coal

POST COMBUSTION CO 2 CAPTURE SCALE UP STUDY

Clean Coal Technology Status: CO 2 Capture & Storage

Request for Proposal Technical Conference: Oregon Meeting (Following Utah Docket

UPDATE ON THE KEMPER COUNTY IGCC PROJECT Gasification Technologies Conference

Comparison of a New Warm-Gas Desulfurization Process versus Traditional Scrubbers for a Commercial IGCC Power Plant

PRECOMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY for Coal Fired Power Plant

J-POWER s CCT Activities

Carbon Capture and Storage: A Technology Solution for Continued Coal Use in a Carbon Constrained World

The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant

Higher Efficiency Power Generation Reduces Emissions

Capture-Ready Coal Plants - Options, Technologies and Economics

Clean Coal Technology Roadmap CURC/EPRI/DOE Consensus Roadmap

Carbon Reduction Options in Power Generation

CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION REFERENCE PLANT DESIGNS AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES

The Outlook for Lower-Cost Carbon Capture and Storage for Climate Change Mitigation

Improving Flexibility of IGCC for Harmonizing with Renewable Energy - Osaki CoolGen s Efforts -

CO 2 Capture. John Davison IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.

IGCC & Gasification for a Changing Marketplace

Evaluating the Cost of Emerging Technologies

ROYAL SOCIETY OF CHEMISTRY TECHNOLOGY IN THE USE OF COAL

Air Separation Unit for Oxy-Coal Combustion Systems

OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS.

Water usage and loss of power in power plants with CO2 capture

Polk Power Key Lessons for IGCC Gasification Technologies Conference October 15, 2015

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

- The Osaki CoolGen Project -

Commercialization of Clean Coal Technology with CO2 Recovery

Ion Transport Membrane (ITM) Technology for Lower-Cost Oxygen Production

Gasification & Water Nexus

Commercial Viability of Near-Zero Emissions Oxy-Combustion Technology for Pulverized Coal Power Plants

MIT Carbon Sequestration Forum VII Pathways to Lower Capture Costs

Chilled Ammonia Technology for CO 2 Capture. October, 2006

Worldwide Pollution Control Association. August 3-4, 2010

Techno-Economic Evaluation of. with Post Combustion Capture

Appendix 3.B Electricity Generation Primer

Chapter 3 Coal-Based Electricity Generation

Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant

Clean Coal Technology

Coal based IGCC technology

The Development of Clean Coal Technology in the US

Performance Improvements for Oxy-Coal Combustion Technology

NOx CONTROL FOR IGCC FACILITIES STEAM vs. NITROGEN

R & D plan results and experience in the Puertollano IGCC

Mitigating carbon penalties clean coal technologies and carbon dioxide capture and storage

Gasification: A Key Technology Platform for Western Canada s Coal and Oil Sands Industries

Economic Assessment of Deploying Advanced Coal Power Technologies in the Chinese Context

THE PSDF--A KEY STEP TOWARDS COMMERCIAL READINESS FOR COAL POWER AN UPDATE

Total Fossil Generation Mix CO 2 Forecast

Integration of carbon capture unit with power generation: technology advances in oxy-combustion plants

Coal power generation technology status and future requirements

WRITECoal Gasification of Low- Rank Coals for Improved Advanced Clean Coal Gasifier / IGCC Design

REPORT. I hereby declare that the work is performed in compliance with the exam regulations of NTNU.

Coal s Strategic Position in the U.S. for the Next 10 Years. Gerald A. Hollinden, Ph.D. URS Corporation Pittsburgh Coal Conference September 24, 2002

The Electric Power Research Institute s Large-Scale Demonstration ti Program for a Low-Carbon Future

Thermodynamic performance of IGCC with oxycombustion

A Technology in Transition. John Topper

Emerging Technologies in Emerging Economies with Emphasis on China & India. Jarad Daniels Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy

CALCIUM LOOPING PROCESS FOR CLEAN FOSSIL FUEL CONVERSION. Shwetha Ramkumar, Robert M. Statnick, Liang-Shih Fan. Daniel P. Connell

THE NOVELEDGE IGCC REFERENCE PLANT: COST AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION POTENTIAL. Gasification Technologies 2004, Washington, DC, October 6, 2004

Clean Coal Technology

Air Products Proposed Renewable Energy Facility in Tees Valley 28 th February

Carbon (CO 2 ) Capture

The Progress of Osaki CoolGen Project

The Cost of CO 2 Capture and Storage

Techno-Economic Assessment of Oxy-Combustion Turbine Power Plants with CO 2 Capture

OPTIMIZATION OF THE SHIFT CONVERSION UNIT IN A GASIFICATION PLANT

Chapter 2 Coal and Coal/Biomass-Based Power Generation

Chilled Ammonia Process Update. Richard Rhudy, EPRI Sean Black, ALSTOM CO 2 Capture Network May 24, 2007 Lyon, France

Water-Saving Technologies for Coal-Fired Power Plant N. HU, Y.F. PEI

COAL POWER PLANTS WITH CO 2 CAPTURE: THE IGCC OPTION

Ultra-Supercritical Oxyfuel Power Generation for CO2 Capture

WRI S PRE GASIFICATION TREATMENT OF PRB COALS FOR IMPROVED ADVANCED CLEAN COAL GASIFIER DESIGN

GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES 2003

Advanced Coal Technologies. Laufer Energy Symposium. Dianna Tickner Peabody Energy April 5, 2013

Transcription:

CoalFleet for Tomorrow Advanced Coal Power Plant Water Usage Ronald L. Schoff (rschoff@epri.com) Project Manager Advanced Coal Generation Options Charlotte, North Carolina July 8 9, 2008 CoalFleet for Tomorrow is a registered service mark of Electric Power Research Institute, Inc.

U.S. Forecasts Largest Coal Generation Capacity Installation in 40 Years Capacity Added (GWs) 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 U.S. Coal Capacity Additions, 1940 2025 Capacity Addition Levels Not Seen in 40 Years Industry Growth Trend Not Seen in 50 Years 20 Year Market Trough 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Source: U.S. Department of Energy NETL & Annual Energy Outlook 2005. 2

Coal Technology Options w/o CO 2 Capture (Approximate data, current technologies) NSPS = New Source Performance Standards PC = Pulvervized Coal SCPC = Supercritical PC USPC = Ultra-Supercritical IGCC = Integrated Gasification NGCC = Natural Gas Efficiency (HHV Basis) PRB Bit. NSPS 2006 -- PC Fleet Average 33% SCPC (1050 F Steam) w/ SCR 37% 38% USPC (1100 F Steam) w/ SCR 38% 39% IGCC (CoP E-Gas) w/ SCR 38% 39% NGCC (GE 7FB) w/ SCR 50% Regulated SO 2 lb/mw-hr NO X lb/mw-hr Particulate lb/mw-hr 1.4 1.0 0.2 13 6 1 0.3 1.1 <0.3 <0.5 <0.2 0.3 1.1 <0.3 <0.5 <0.2 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 nil 0.1 nil Mercury % Reduction -- ~36% 80% 80% 90% -- Non- Regulated CO 2 lb/mw-hr Water Usage gal/mw-hr -- -- 2,250 800 1,950 1,900 660 1,900 1,850 600 1,850 1,800 400 800 300 Relative Emissions Profiles for PC and IGCC are Very Low. 3

Overview Water enters gas path in coal as moisture and hydrogen Gasification-produced syngas contains H 2 and H 2 O H 2 O is condensed prior to combustion and is recoverable Combustion products contain only H 2 O H 2 O is contained in flue gas to the atmosphere 80% or more of water use in an advanced coal plant is Cooling Water Condenser duty has the greatest impact on Cooling Water flow Cooling water temperature has a direct impact on Power Output need to keep it low while reducing water usage 4

Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (w/o CO 2 Capture) Sulfur Separation Tail Gas Recycle Sulfur Recovery Unit Oxygen Coal Gasifier Syngas Cooler or Quench Filter COS Hydrolysis Syngas Cooling & Hg Removal Acid Gas Removal Unit Acid Gas Slag Particulates Syngas Diluent (N 2 ) Water Clean Fuel Gas Reheat/ Humid. Extraction Water In Water Out Fuel Gas Coal H 2 O Flue Gas Coal H 2 Condensation AGR Solvent CT Evaporation CT Blowdown Gas Turbine HRSG Steam Turbine Raw Water 5

IGCC Plant Overview Current IGCC Plants contain 2 trains of equipment to produce ~780 MWe of gross power output 70% of auxiliary power required is from intercooled compressors (~110 MWe at ISO) Increasing CW temperature by 20 F increases power demand by ~5% for compressors 1 Hga increase in Condenser backpressure can reduce gross power by ~5% There are significant financial drivers to maintaining low CW temperature while reducing water losses, thus usage 6

Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (w/ CO 2 Capture) Sulfur Separation Steam Tail Gas Recycle Sulfur Recovery Unit Oxygen Coal Gasifier Syngas Cooler or Quench Filter Water Gas Shift Syngas Cooling & Hg Removal Acid Gas / CO 2 Removal Unit Acid Gas Slag Particulates CO 2 Syngas Diluent (N 2 ) Water CO 2 Comp. Extraction Water In Water Out Fuel Gas Reheat/ Humid. Clean Fuel Gas CO 2 To Pipeline Coal H 2 O Flue Gas Coal H 2 Condensation CT Evaporation Gas Turbine HRSG Steam Turbine AGR Solvent CT Blowdown Raw Water 7

IGCC Plant Overview Addition of CO 2 Capture Water gas shift reactors included to convert CO to CO 2 for removal; also convert H 2 O to H 2 More H 2 to gas turbine increases emissions of H 2 O at stack and reduces recoverable condensed water Increased coal demand to meet GT needs increases water usage incrementally by ~5% Reduction in net MWe from plant impact the specific water usage more than actual water usage, which is driven mostly by gross MWe, not net MWe 8

Pulverized Coal Combustion (w/o CO 2 Capture) Limestone Slurry Activated Carbon Baghouse / ESP FGD Flue Gas To Stack ID Fans SCR Fly Ash Evaporation & Blowdown Losses Gypsum Secondary Fans Pulverized Coal Boiler Steam Turbine / Condenser Cooling Tower Water In Coal H 2 O Water Out Flue Gas Primary Fans Pulverized Coal Power Makeup Water Coal H 2 Gypsum CT Evaporation LS Slurry CT Blowdown Bottom Ash Raw Water 9

PC Plant Overview All power in a PC plant comes from the Steam Turbine Condenser duty is higher per net MW for PC than IGCC, as a result Water usage is higher for PC as a consequence FGD and Wet ESP can have further impact on water use 10

Pulverized Coal Combustion (w/o CO 2 Capture) Limestone Slurry Activated Carbon Baghouse / ESP FGD CO 2 Capture Flue Gas To Stack ID Fans Secondary Fans SCR Pulverized Coal Boiler Fly Ash Steam Turbine / Condenser Gypsum Evaporation & Blowdown Losses Cooling Tower CO 2 CO 2 Compressor Water In Coal H 2 O Water Out Flue Gas Primary Fans Power Makeup Water Coal H 2 Gypsum Pulverized Coal CT Evaporation Bottom Ash LS Slurry CT Blowdown Raw Water 11

PC Plant Overview CO 2 Capture Flue gas needs to be cooled prior to CO 2 capture, which normally results in installation of a direct contact cooler Some water may be recoverable CO 2 capture system condenses ~50% of LP steam for solvent reboiling, which reduces condenser duty Additional cooling demand imposed by CCS system (solvent cooling, primarily) Specific water usage is much higher than non-capture due to high level of power loss in CO 2 capture system Actual water usage may go up 10-20%, but not as much as specific water usage implies Note: Oxyfuel combustion depends on separation of CO 2 and H 2 O in a flue gas condenser this technology could be used to recover water from all coal power cycles 12

IGCC, PC & NGCC Plant Water Loss Comparison 700 714 gal/mwh 600 639 gal/mwh Water Loss, Gal/Mwh 500 400 300 433 gal/mwh 301.2 443 gal/mwh 452 gal/mwh 340.6 344.6 510 gal/mwh 371.8 370 gal/mwh 597.9 535.8 200 282.6 100 0 105.5 104.8 76.8 78 87 107 94.8 25.9 25.5 28.9 33.8 9.3 8.3 E-Gas Shell GE R-C GE Quench NGCC PC Sub PC Super Process Losses Flue gas losses Cooling water losses 13

IGCC, PC & NGCC Plant Water Loss Comparison 25.0 22.3 20.0 Raw Water Usage (gpm/mwnet) 15.0 10.0 6.1 8.3 9.9 9.7 5.0 4.5 0.0 IGCC IGCC w/co2 USCPC USCPC w/co2 NGCC NGCC w/co2 14

Advanced Coal Power Plants EPRI Program Options EPRI CoalFleet for Tomorrow Program (P66): Accelerating deployment of advanced coal technologies: IGCC Ultra-supercritical PC (>1100ºF) Supercritical Circulating Fluidized-Bed Oxyfuel Combustion Fostering development of IGCC CO 2 capture capability/ convertibility. EPRI CO 2 Capture and Storage (P165): Accelerating development of advanced post-combustion CO 2 capture technology (PC plants). Understanding issues and demonstrating security of CO 2 storage from fossil generation. 15

Questions and Discussion 16