United States Patent (19)

Similar documents
United States Patent (19) Pinto

United States Patent (19)

Methanol Production by Gasification of Heavy Residues

METHANOL CONVERTER AND SYNLOOP DESIGNS FOR GASIFICATION PLANTS

Ammonia plants. Flexible solutions for all feedstocks.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,159,440 Schoubye (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 12, 2000

Module 4 : Hydrogen gas. Lecture 29 : Hydrogen gas

Report No. 32 HYDROGEN. December A private report by the PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE PARK, CALIFORNIA

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,250,530 B2 Bagala et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 31, 2007

1. Process Description:

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/ A1

The methanol synthesis. Antal Tungler Emeritus professzor MTA Centre for Energy Research 2017

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No by NICK KORENS ROBERT W. VAN SCOY. January private report by the PARK, CALIFORNIA

Combined Methane Decomposition and Ammonia Formation Cell

Topsøe Methanol Technology for Coal Based Plants

United States Patent (19) Studer et al.

Jain (45) Date of Patent: May 5, /1989 Thorogood et al /247

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1

PERP/PERP ABSTRACTS Carbon Monoxide PERP 09/10S11

Hydrogen Separation Membrane Applications

Austro Energy Systems Int. AG. Gas reformer AES3000

SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS PLANT. Philadelphia, PA

Synthesis Gas Processes for Synfuels Production

Lecture 4. Ammonia: Production and Storage - Part 1

United States Patent (19) Goebel et al.

Abstract PEP Review ETHYLENE GLYCOL PRODUCTION FROM COAL-BASED SYNTHESIS GAS By Syed N. Naqvi and R. J. Chang (October 2012)

DISCLAIMER. Portions of this document may be illegible electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

PRISM Membrane Systems for petrochemical applications... tell me more

environmental impacts. These impurity levels may be very heterogeneous and in

CASALE COAL-BASED METHANOL SYNLOOPS

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,037,877 B1

United States Patent (19) Nahas

Nuclear Hydrogen for Production of Liquid Hydrocarbon Transport Fuels

Industrial Gases. Chapter 3 1. NITROGEN. 1.1 Manufacture

24, as. United States Patent Vlaming et al. 11 Patent Number: 5,985,230 (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 16, 1999

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/ A1. Merritt, JR. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 8, 2017

United States Patent (19) Woodard

Carbon To X. Processes

Combined Methane Decomposition and Ammonia Formation Cell DIV

Successful Sulfur Control & Hydrogen Purification at Saras World-Scale IGCC Plant

An Opportunity for Methanol; the Production Starting from Coal

Fischer Tropsch Catalyst Test on Coal-Derived Synthesis Gas

Production of synthesis gas from liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons, and the synthesis gas per se, are covered by group C01B 3/00.

UOP Selexol TM Technology Applications for CO 2 Capture

Reforming is an upgrading process in which low octane gasoline is converted to high octane gasoline.

Pathways & industrial approaches for utilization of CO 2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

Analysis of Exergy and Energy of Gasifier Systems for Coal-to-Fuel

PEP Review METHANOL PRODUCTION VIA TOYO PROCESS By Syed N. Naqvi (December 2011) ABSTRACT

GTL. and Edited and Revised 2016 by H M Fahmy

HIGH PUITY CARBON MONOXIDE FROM A FEED GAS ARNOLD KELLER AND RONALD SCHENDEL KINETICS TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA

CRYOGENIC SOLVENT ABATEMENT (VOC s )

THE UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN

Item Hydrogen Gas Plant

USOO A. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,137,558. Agrawal (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 11, 1992

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

United States Patent (19) Bains et al.

Chemistry of Petrochemical Processes

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

CO 2 recovery from industrial hydrogen facilities and steel production to comply with future European Emission regulations

EARLY ENTRANCE COPRODUCTION PLANT PHASE II. Topical Report. Task 2.2: Fischer-Tropsch Mathematical Model and Reactor Scaleup Confirmation

Control Valve Sourcebook Chemical Process Overview

PERP Program New Report Alert

Pilot Scale Production of Mixed Alcohols from Wood. Supplementary Information

Scott Hume. Electric Power Research Institute, 1300 West WT Harris Blvd, Charlotte NC 28262

Available online at Energy Procedia 1 (2009) (2008) GHGT-9. Sandra Heimel a *, Cliff Lowe a

III IIII. United States Patent (19) Miller et al. 11 Patent Number: 5,618,331 (45. Date of Patent: Apr. 8, 1997

Thermodynamic performance of IGCC with oxycombustion

Chapter 10 Material Balances for Processes Involving Reaction 10.1 Species Material Balances Processes Involving a Single Reaction

1.53(d), and is subject to the twenty year wo,,... WE "". CO7C 27/00

The material balance equations, after introducing the known values for the variables, are:

Synthesis of DME via Catalytic Conversion of Biomass

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7, B2

the entire ammonia system. For validation, the model was calibrated to the best available reference.

United States Patent (19) Stokes

United States Patent (19) Fuderer

SINGLE STEP COMPACT STEAM METHANE REFORMING PROCESS FOR HYDROGEN-CNG (H-CNG) PRODUCTION FROM NATURAL GAS

United States Patent (19) Winkler et al.

Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

United States Patent (19)

PRODUCTION OF SYNGAS BY METHANE AND COAL CO-CONVERSION IN FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR

GASOLINE FROM NATURAL GAS BY SULFUR PROCESSING

562,538. Ranjani V. Siriwardane REMOVAL OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE FROM COAL GAS DURABLE REGENERABLE SORBENT PELLETS FOR METC. 5 z 71 -I. zcn.

(12) United States Patent

Air Products Pressure Swing Adsorption at the National Carbon Capture Center

COMPREHENSIVE MSW PROCESSING STEPS BIO COKE METHOD

CPC field-specific training

with Physical Absorption

Chapter 13. Thermal Conversion Technologies. Fundamentals of Thermal Processing

Questions. Downdraft biomass gasifier. Air. Air. Blower. Air. Syngas line Filter VFD. Gas analyzer(s) (vent)

AGC NovaPRO Process Gas Chromatograph Refinery Applications

Current Review of DOE s Syngas Technology Development Jai-woh Kim, Dave Lyons and Regis Conrad United States Department of Energy, USA

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1

Geothermic Fuel Cell Applications in Coal Coal Gasification---Coal to Liquids (Summary Highlights)

Transcription:

United States Patent (19) van Dijk et al. (11) 4,407,973 Oct. 4, 1983 54) (75) (73) 21 22 (51) 52) 58) METHANOL FROM COAL AND NATURAL GAS Inventors: Christiaan P. van Dijk, Houston; Aage Solbakken, Montgomery; Jerry M. Rovner, Houston, all of Tex. Assignee: The M. W. Kellogg Company, Houston, Tex. Appl. No.: 402,521 Filed: Jul. 28, 1982 Int. Cl.... C07C 27/06; CO7C 31/04 U.S. Cl.... 518/703; 518/704 Field of Search... 518/703,704 56) References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 4,277,416 7/1981 Grant... 58/703 Primary Examiner-Howard T. Mars (57) ABSTRACT The present invention is directed to a process which uses the methanol synthesis gas from steam reforming in a first methanol plant and effectively integrates a second methanol plant which uses as the methanol synthesis gas (a) the purge gas from the first methanol plant and (b) the clean syn-gas produced by partial oxidation. 7 Claims, 1 Drawing Figure

U.S. Patent Oct. 4, 1983 4,407,973 77 ZAÉT (A) 22* 42 62 Z 9

1. METHANOL FROM COAL AND NATURAL GAS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a process for producing methanol which uses steam reforming, e.g. steam re forming natural gas, and partial oxidation, e.g. partial oxidation of coal, as sources of the methanol synthesis gas, More specifically, the present invention is directed to a process which uses the methanol synthesis gas from steam reforming in a first methanol plant and effectively integrates a second methanol plant which uses as the methanol synthesis gas (a) the purge gas from the first methanol plant and (b) the clean syn-gas produced by partial oxidation. The prior art discloses methods for producing metha nol using natural gas as the hydrocarbon feed and other methods using coal as the hydrocarbon feed. BACKGROUND REFERENCES The following references are incorporated into the disclosure of this patent by reference: - 1-Kirk-Othmer, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMI CALTECHNOLOGY, 3rd Ed., Vol., pp. 398-4, "Methanol'. 2. Kirk-Othmer, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMI CAL TECHNOLOGY, 3rd ed., Vol. 6, pp. 224-377, Coal' and "Coal Conversion Processes". 3. Kirk-Othmer, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMI CALTECHNOLOGY, 2nd Ed., Vol. 10, pp. 3-442, "Gas, Manufactured'. 4. U.S. Pat. No. 4,277,416 which discloses a single methanol plant which is fed by clean syn-gas from coal gasification and syn-gas from natural gas. The following references are included as being of interest: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,501,516 3,9,717 3,940,428 3,962,0 3,972,958 3,993,7 4,0,483 4,076,761 4,3,9 4,219,492 4,238,403 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention is directed to a process for producing methanol which integrates a first methanol plant with a second methanol plant. The first methanol plant is designed to use a synthesis gas produced by steam reforming a methane-rich gas. The second metha nol plant is designed to use as the methanol synthesis gas (a) the purge gas from the first methanol plant and (b) the clean syn-gas obtained from the partial oxidation of a heavy carbonaceous material, such as coal. The inte gration of two methanol plants according to the present invention provides an improved process which employs the unit operations of steam reforming and partial oxi dation to convert different hydrocarbon feeds into methanol synthesis gas and has a total capacity between 1. and 1.75 of the design capacity of the first methanol plant, based on methane-rich gas alone...., More specifically, the present invention is directed to a process for producing methanol which comprises 4,407,973 O 40 50 2 converting a methane-rich gas by steam reforming into a mixture comprising hydrogen and carbon oxides and reacting said mixture in a first methanol plant which produces a methanol stream and a purge gas stream, the improvement to produce a total capacity of methanol between 1. and 1.75 of the design capacity of the first methanol plant comprising: (a) converting by high temperature partial oxidation using essentially pure oxygen a heavy carbonaceous material into a mixture of gases comprising hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, other acid gases and hydrocarbons; (b) removing said other acid gases and trace elements of sulfur to produce a clean syngas; and (c) reacting said purge gas and said clean syn-gas in a second methanol plant to produce a second methanol stream. DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING The FIGURE is a block flow diagram of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Normally, methanol is produced by the catalytic conversion of a methanol synthesis gas mixture contain ing hydrogen and carbon oxides at elevated pressure. The catalytic conversion in which a highly selective copper-based catalyst is employed may be represented by the following chemical equations: The methanol synthesis gas mixture is usually prepared by steam reforming a methane-rich gas, such as natural gas or a refinery gas stream having a high methane content. In a methanol process where only steam re forming is used to produce the methanol synthesis gas mixture however, the synthesis gas mixture thus pro duced has an excess of hydrogen for the stoichiometry of the methanol synthesis reaction. Therefore to achieve a more optimum hydrogen/carbon oxides bal ance, if available, carbon dioxide is added to the metha nol synthesis gas. However, since methanol is manufac tured at elevated pressures and carbon dioxide is usually available only at lower pressures, an expensive com pressor is required to compress the carbon dioxide to the operating pressure. In the process of the present invention, all the hydrogen produced by steam reform ing of the methane-rich gas is used to produce methanol and does not require the added unit operation of adding carbon dioxide. The supply of methanol synthesis gas may be alter nately derived from other fossil fuel sources, i.e. heavy carbonaceous materials such as coal, coke, shale, naph tha and petroleum residues. A synthesis gas suitable for use in the production of methanol from such heavy carbonaceous materials can be obtained by high temper ature partial oxidation using essentially pure oxygen. The partial oxidation of coal or coal gasification, such as processes using a Shell gasifier or a Texaco gasifier, are known in the art. However, a methanol process using a synthesis gas derived from such heavy carbona ceous materials alone is very expensive on the scale required for reasonably sized methanol plants. Further,

3 the reliability of the partial oxidation process for on stream performance is less than for steam reforming. As the availability of natural gas decreases or it be comes more expensive, an alternate source of fossil fuel becomes necessary for the production of methanol syn thesis gas. According to the process of the present in vention, the advantages of the steam reforming process are maintained while integrating a second source of methanol synthesis gas produced by partial oxidation. Further, according to the process of the present inven tion the existing methanol plants now using the steam reforming of natural gas without supplemental feed of carbon dioxide may be modified to expand capacity to between 1. and 1.75 times existing capacity. Referring to the FIGURE, natural gas is introduced by line 1 together with steam by line 2 into a steam reformer 3. Steam reforming is a conventional unit operation and known in the art. The conventional steam reformer is a furnace having a series of tubes filled with a nickel or treated nickel catalyst over which the natu ral gas passes and is converted into a mixture of gases. The mixture comprises hydrogen, carbon oxides, small amounts of unconverted hydrocarbons, mainly meth ane, and the inert gases nitrogen and argon. This mix ture of gases is removed from the steam reformer 3 and passed through a heat exchanger for heat recovery and the condensed water is removed by line 4. The dry mixture of gases is then passed by line 5 to a gas com pressor 6. The compressed gases pass through line 7 to a first methanol plant 8. For the purposes of this patent, the methanol plant 8 is inclusive of a reactor or reactors which contain the methanol catalyst, the recycle sytem which recycles the unconverted gases through the reactor since only a percentage of the gas is converted to methanol on any pass through the reactor and all associated equipment to produce the crude methanol. Thus the term "methanol plant' as used herein is inclusive of all necessary equip ment to produce the crude methanol. Usually included is purification equipment to produce high purity metha nol such as a distillation system. The methanol plant 8 may be represented by a low pressure methanol plant operating at synthesis pressures of 50-100 atmospheres and employing an ICI, Lurgi, or other copper-based methanol catalyst. The low pressure synthesis operating with a copper-based catalyst is gen erally in the temperature range of 240-270 C. How ever, the specific reactor, catalyst or conditions are not material to the present invention and such are known in the art. A purge is taken from methanol plant 8 by line 9. This purge is taken from the recycle loop to the reactor or reactors normally, to rid the system of the inert gases and excess hydrogen. The methanol plant 8 also pro duces a first methanol stream 10. In the process of the present invention, the purge gas stream 9 is used with syn-gas stream produced by partial oxidation to feed a second methanol plant as will be described in more detail hereinafter. A second source of hydrocarbon is employed to pro duce the methanol synthesis gas to feed a second metha nol plant. The preferred heavy carbonaceous material is coal. Coal or coal plus water is fed by line 11, steam by line 12 and oxygen by line 13 to a coal gasifier 14. The gasifier is preferably a high temperature gasifier known in the art, e.g. a Shell gasifier, a Shell-Koppers gasifier or a Texaco gasifier. In these gasifiers a raw gas is pro duced, depending on the specific coal employed. The 4,407,973 10 40 50 4. specific composition of the raw gas will vary; however, the gas is mostly carbon monoxide and hydrogen. The raw gas from the gasifier 14 will also contain some carbon dioxide and other acid gases besides the inert gases argon and nitrogen. For the purposes of this pa tent, the term "other acid gases' are the other acid gases besides carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, such as the sulfur containing gases, i.e. H2S and COS, and cya nides. The other acid gases are all more selectively absorbed than the carbon oxides. The raw gas is passed through compressor 17 and line 18 into an acid gas removal system 19. The acid gas removal system 19 may be any of the well known absorbents, i.e. methanol, polyethylene glycol dimethyl ether, monoethanol ami ne(mea)-diethanol amine(dea), for acid gases and is operated to selectively absorb the other acid gases with some removal of carbon dioxide. The acid gases are usually removed by contacting or scrubbing the raw gas from the gasifier.14 with the absorbent in an absorp tion tower. The rich absorbent solution, i.e. the other acid gases containing absorbent, can be readily regener ated for reuse. The regeneration may be carried out in a stripper column where the rich absorbent solution is heated and/or reduced in pressure which separates the small amount of carbon dioxide and other acid gases from the absorbent. The small amount of carbon dioxide and other acid gases are removed from the acid gas removal system 19 by line. The scrubbed gas is removed by line 21 and may be further compressed by passing through compressor 22. The compressed gas may be passed through a guard chamber 24 containing zinc oxide to remove any trace sulfur in the gases. Since sulfur in a poison to the metha nol catalysts, the guard chamber 24 is a precautionary operation and other alternatives may be employed. According to the present invention, the clear syn-gas, a gas which by its normal composition would not be a desirable syn-gas for methanol, from the guard chamber 24 is removed by line and together with the purge, gas in the stream 9 from the first methanol plant 8 is introduced by line 26 to a second methanol plant 27. The design capacity of the second methanol plant 27 is, approximately to 75 percent of the capacity of the first methanol plant 8. From the second methanol plant.. is produced a second methanol stream 28 and a purge'. stream 29 which may be used as fuel..... When maximum capacity of methanol is desired, an : increase of over approximately fifty percent of the de sign basis of the first methanol plant 8, a high tempera ture shift unit operation is included in the production of the syn-gas from the heavy carbonaceous material or coal feed. A line 31 passes the raw gas from gasifier 14 to the high temperature shift. The shift is carried out in a conventional manner by the addition of steam. through line 32 which when passed over the known sulfur-resistant catalysts converts the carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and hydrogen by the following well known shift reaction: Since this unit operation preceeds the acid gas removal system 19, the additional carbon dioxide produced by the high temperature shift will be removed in system 19. The gas from the high temperature shift is re moved by line 33 and introduced behind a valve 34 in line 16. A valve may be included in line 31. Valves 34 and may be opened or closed so as to pass all or a

5 portion or none of the raw gas from gasifier 14 through the high temperature shift. A second embodiment of the present invention in cludes a line 36 with a valve 27 or other control means which takes a portion of the clear syn-gas in line and introduces the gas to the first methanol plant 8. By introducing the clean syn-gas to the first methanol plant, an additional amount of methanol is produced since the composition of the combined gases is stoih cometrically more desirable. The second methanol plant 27 may then have a smaller design basis and still obtain the over all advantages of the present invention. For a better unerstanding of the present invention, reference is had to the following specific example, which makes reference to the drawings. 38 pound moles / hour (#mol/hr) of desulfurized natural gas, line 1 and 14228 #mol/hr of steam, line 2, are fed to a conventional steam reformer 3. The reform ing is carried out over conventional nickel catalyst, and after waste, heat recovery and condensing 91 #mol/hr of water, line 4, dry reformed gas is available at atmospheres (295 psia). The reformed gas, line 5, - consists of 16271 #mol/hr of gas with a composition of 73.38 mol% H2; 13.61 mol% CO; 8.98 mol% CO23.99 mol % CH4 and 0.04 mol %, H2-- Ar. The reformed gas, line 5, is compressed by compressor 6 to 80 atmo spheres (1176 psia) to provide feed gas, line 7, to a first methanol plant 8. Using a conventional ICI methanol catalyst and at low pressures (50-100 atmospheres) a crude methanol stream, line 10, consisting of 3492 #mol/hr of pure methanol together with 1376#mol/hr of water and small amounts of other impurities is pro duced. The crude methanol stream 10 can be further purified by conventional distillation as desired. A purge stream, line 9, is taken out of the first metha nol plant 8 at about 80 atmospheres (1176 psia) to re move inerts in the recycle to the reactors. The inerts are methane, nitrogen and argon. The purge stream, line 9, contains 4419 #mol/hr gas having a composition: 81.01 mol % H2; 2.22 mol % Co; 1.92 mol % CO2; 14.71 mol % CH4; and 0.14 mol % N2+ Ar. In addition, 1 #/hr of dry coal (Illonois No. 6), line 11, is introduced with 1409 if mol/hr of water or steam, line 12, and 917 #mol/hr of pure oxygen, line 13, to a gasifier 14. After waste heat recovery to raise steam and removal of 1124 #mol/hr of water, line, 2777 #mol/hr of raw gas is produced, line 16, with a compo sition: 34.93 mol % H2; 42.92 mol % CO; 19.95 mol % CO2; 0.32 mol % CH4; 0.47 mol % N2+ Ar; and 1.41 mol % other acid gases, at a pressure of about 34.4 atmospheres (505 psia). The other acid gases are various sulfur and cyanide compounds. The raw gas, line 16, is compressed to 36.4 atmospheres (5 psia) by compres Sor 17 to provide a feed gas, line 18, to a conventional acid gas removal system 19 which removes 39 #mol/hr of other acid gases and some small amount of carbon dioxide, line. The sulfur compounds in the other acid gas are poisons to the methanol synthesis catalysts. The clean gas, line 21, is further compressed by compressor 22 to a pressure of 80.7 atmospheres (1186 psia). The compressed gas is passed over a zinc oxide (ZnO) guard bed in guard chamber 24 for trace sulfur compound removal. The clean syn-gas, line, consists of 2738 #mol/hr of gas with a composition:.43 mol % H2; 43.54 mol % CO;.23 mol % CO2; 0.32 mol % CH4; and 0.48 mol % N2-(-Ar. This clean syn-gas, line, is mixed with the purge gas stream from the first methanol plant, line 9, to give a total syn-gas, line 26, of 77 4,407,973 5 O SO 6 #mol/hr, with a composition: 63.57 mol % H2; 18.02 mol % CO; 8.93 mol % CO2; 9.18 mol % CH4 and 0.3 mol % N2 - Ar, which is introduced to the second methanol plant 27 at a pressure about 80 atmospheres (1176 psia). The second methanol plant produces a crude metha nol stream, line 28, consisting of 1703 #mol/hr metha nol, 481 #mol/hr H2O plus small amounts of impurities, A purge stream is produced, line 29, with 67#mol/hr of gas having a composition: 42.31 mol % H2; 4.34 mol % CO; 10.08 mol % CO2; 1.22 mol % N2+ Ar and 42.05 mol % CH4, which may be used as fuel. The total pure methanol production from the inte grated plants of the present invention is the sum of the pure methanol in the two crude product streams, lines 10 and 28, namely 5195 #mol/hr pure methanol. The integrated plants of the present invention when compared to two separate plants for producing metha nol assuming identical feed are substantially more effi cient. For example, assuming 1 #/hr of coal, if no shift, reaction is carried out less than 700 it mol/hr of methanol can be produced, if technically the catalyst could withstand the poor synthesis gas produced. If to obtain a stoichiometrically acceptable gas, 544 #mol/hr of CO were shifted, line 31-33, and 10 #mol/hr of CO2 removed in the acid gas removal system 19, ap proximately 704 #mol/hr of methanol would be pro duced. Thus, the combined capacity of two indepen dent plants would only yield 4197 #mol/hr. The inte grated plants of the present invention represents a 23.8% increase over the independent plants based on the identical coal and natural gas feed. Further, the integrated plants of the present invention take advantage of the on stream reliability of the pro cesses which produce the methanol synthesis gas. The steam reforming process is better than 95% reliable whereas the coal gasification process is just over 80%. Thus, when the clean syn-gas from the coal gasification process is shut down, the first methanol plant of the present invention is not affected and may continue to operate under design conditions. Still further, as illustrated by the example, the inte grated plants of the present invention may be used with a steam reforming process and a coal gasification pro cess where no shift reaction is carried out on the raw gas from the coal gasifier. The advantage is the elimina tion of an entire process unit and in addition a smaller acid gas removal system. In summary, the present invention uses to a maximum advantage the steam reforming process and a oxidation process of converting a heavy carbonaceous material to produce synthesis gas which taken individually are not an optimum synthesis gas for methanol, and integrated the operations are such that an improved process for producing methanol is achieved. We claim: 1. In a process for producing methanol which com prises converting a methane-rich gas by steam reform ing into a mixture comprising hydrogen and carbon oxides and reacting said mixture in a first methanol plant which produces a methanol stream and a purge gas stream, the improvement to produce a total capacity of methanol between 1. and 1.75 of the design capac ity of said first methanol plant comprising: (a) converting by high temperature partial oxidation using essentially pure oxygen a heavy carbona ceous material into a raw gas comprising hydro

4,407,973 7 gen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, other acid gases and hydrocarbons; (b) removing said other acid gases and trace elements of sulfur to produce a clean syn-gas; and (c) reacting said purge gas and said clean syn-gas in a second methanol plant to produce a second metha nol stream. 2. A process for producing methanol according to claim 1 wherein the pressure in the methanol reactors of 10 said first methanol plant is between and 0 atmo spheres and the pressure in the methanol reactors of said second methanol plant is between and 190 atmo spheres. 3. A process for producing methanol according to claim 1 wherein a portion of said clean syn-gas is re acted in said first methanol plant. 8 4. A process for producing methanol according to claim 1 wherein said second methanol plant produces a second purge gas stream which is used as fuel in the conversion of said methane-rich gas by steam reform ling. 5. A process for producing methanol according to claim 1 wherein said first methanol plant is a pre-exist ing plant. 6. A process for producing methanol according to claim 1 wherein a high temperature shift step is between steps (a) and (b) which converts some of the carbon monoxide to hydrogen and carbon dioxide and remov ing said carbon dioxide produced. 7. A process for producing methanol according to claim 1 wherein there is no high temperature shift step between steps (a) and (b). k : ck k 40 50