Attachment N o F.2 EMISSIONS MONITORING AND SAMPLING POINTS

Similar documents
Attachment N o F Control & Monitoring

Inflow pipe. Drain. Drain

Refer to Chapter 3.0 (Description of Development) for a detailed site and development description.

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. MSc CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER TWO EXAMINATION 2017/2018 URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS MODULE NO: BLT4022

Report. Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan St. Clair Power Plant St. Clair, Michigan. DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI

THE STUDY ON INTEGRATED URBAN DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FOR MELAKA AND SUNGAI PETANI IN MALAYSIA FINAL REPORT

Report. Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan Belle River Power Plant East China, Michigan. DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI

INFRASTRUCTURE & OPERATION

CRYSTAL LAKE FLOODING STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Separators. A Range of Fuel/Oil Separators for Peace of Mind.

ATTACHMENT E.2 EMISSIONS TO SURFACE WATERS SITE SERVICES LAYOUT SHEET 1 OF 2 (IE DR-0021)

Environmental Guideline on Stone crushing plant set up temporarily for the purpose of a project by a public department

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR DEWATERING

Attachment 12 Stage 1 Flood Risk Assessment (IE RP-0001)

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

ATTACHMENT N o A1: NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

13. High Rate Filtration Process

Stormwater Attenuation Systems Sustainable Drainage Solutions for Domestic & Commercial Applications

EPA Waste Water Discharge Licence Application

Community SHEC Report. Kooragang Island March 2015

Georgia Power Plant Bowen NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised December 2017

TechNews. Part 2: Creative Solutions to Secondary Containment at Electrical Substations December 2018

Flood Risk Assessment. for. Proposed Residential Development at Bentletts Scrap Yard Claygate Road Collier Street Kent

2.0 SITE LOCATION AND CONTEXT

Notes on Monitoring Data

Notes on Monitoring Data

Oversized quarry sumps can be used to store run-off during

Lombard s Storm, Sanitary & Combined Sewers. Unseen Networks at Work

TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS REMOVAL TEST OF A HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE WATER QUALITY UNIT. By James T. Mailloux Dean K. White

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

PLANNING REPORT. For inspection purposes only. MOUNTMELLICK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PART 8 PROCEDURE

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

1 Construction The sewage treatment plant (STP) is to be an Icon-Septech Pty Ltd Turbojet 5000 as described below and as shown on the drawings.

1 Construction The sewage treatment plant (STP) is to be an Icon-Septech Pty Ltd Turbojet 4000 as described below and as shown on the drawings.

Chapter 1 Introduction

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

To: From: Date: Subject: Sherwood Lakes Drainage Alternatives Analysis 1

Orica Kooragang Island Community Reference Group Monthly Briefing Paper #15 January 2013

San Francisco State University Site 1 Vegetated Infiltration Basin Monitoring Report: Rainy Seasons and

Controlling runon and runoff:

1 Construction The sewage treatment plant (STP) is to be an Icon-Septech Pty Ltd Turbojet 2000 as described below and as shown on the drawings.

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

TABLE B.3 - STORMWATER BMP POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES

VERIFICATION STATEMENT

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Storm water Catchment Analysis

Bowling Green, Kentucky Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Sediment Management Practices (SMPs) Activity: Temporary Inlet Protection (TIP)

Appendix 8.4. Site-wide Drainage Strategy

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

GRADING, EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL

Stormwater Management Report Bachman Terrace Residential Development

VERIFICATION STATEMENT

STORM DRAINAGE CHAPTER 11

D.G.S.W. Pitakumbura Manager (Groundwater Studies) Groundwater Section NWS&DB. Groundwater recharge or deep drainage or

Georgia Power Plant McDonough-Atkinson NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised May 2018

APPENDIX E APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS

Orica Kooragang Island. Community Reference Group. Monthly Briefing Paper #3 January 2012 ISSUED FOR CRG MEETING ON 30 JANUARY 2012

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE

Water Resources Management Plan

Learning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to:

Ayrburn Farm Development Infrastructure Assessment Report

Appendix 11. Erosion and Sediment Control Management Plan. Appendix 11

ASH FILTER PONDS INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM INITIAL PLAN

PRESSURE SEWER SYSTEMS: NEW DESIGN INNOVATIONS CAN IMPROVE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Action plans for hotspot locations

Table 4.7.2(II) BREF Document on Best Available Techniques on Emissions from Storage, July 2006

ROOF AND PROPERTY DRAINAGE

New England Quarry Resource Recovery Centre Landfill Nr Ivybridge, Devon Environmental Permit (EP) Application Surface Water Management Plan

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

Chapter 2: Selecting Best Management Practices (BMPs)

Drainage Servicing Report - Terms of Reference

Wastewater Discharge Reduction Plan June 2016

FUNCTIONAL SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY 405 TWEEDSMUIR AVENUE

Globeville Landing Outfall Surface Water. December 12, 2017 Andrew Ross, Jon Novick Denver Department of Public Health & Environment

ESK TM. Oil/Water Separator with Automatic Shutoff Valve. Our waterways. Our future.

Elsham Water Treatment Works (WTW) is located approximately 10km east of Scunthorpe in North Lincolnshire

D. B. G R A Y E N G I N E E R I N G I N C.

BAT Guidance Note on Best Available Techniques for the Production of Cement and for the Production of Lime in a Kiln

14.0 MONITORING AND CONTINGENCY 14.1 Effects Monitoring

MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN WEST LORNE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Date: 12/07/99. FINAL REPORT Micco E Exfiltration Pipe Project Demonstration Project DEP Contract # WM603. Prepared by:

Environmental Assessment Chapter 8 Surface Water

STORM WATER REPORT ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PLANTS JINKINSON SIDE ROAD, ASHTON CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO PREPARED FOR:

RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

STORM DRAINAGE CHAPTER 11

Georgia Power Plant McManus NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised April 2018

VERIFICATION STATEMENT

WESTPORT, CO. MAYO, IRELAND.

City of Gardiner, Maine Wastewater Committee Meeting. CSO Storage Tank & Screening Evaluation

Preliminary Rainfall Runoff Management for Developments EA/Defra Report Procedure W5-074/A Summary Guidance for Developers and Engineers

1. Overview 2 2. Definitions 2 3. Laboratory Testing Criteria 2. A. Laboratory Qualifications 2. B. Analysis of TSS Samples 2. C.

Environmental Control Plan

CHAPTER 17: STORM SEWER STANDARDS Introduction Administration Standards 17.1

A signed statement from the manufacturer listing the protocol requirements and indicating that all of the requirements were met or exceeded.

APPENDIX F: DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS IAPMO GUIDE CRITERIA FOR

HUBER Sewerage Program

CEAA ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AMBASSADOR BRIDGE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT. Replacement Span and Plaza Expansion APPENDIX E

Appendix A9.1: Private Water Supply Supplementary Environmental Information

Transcription:

Attachment N o F.2 EMISSIONS MONITORING AND SAMPLING POINTS Lagan Cement Ltd. IPPC Licence Application

Attachment N o F.2 EMISSIONS MONITORING AND SAMPLING POINTS Air Contents F.2.0 Air Emissions.3 Water F.2.1 Introduction... 4 F.2.2 Major emission point (SW1) OS 257290E, 244605N... 4 F.2.3 Minor emission point (SW2) OS 266535E, 242705N... 7 Attachment N o F.2 Page 2 of 7

AIR F.2.0 Air Emissions All sampling points will remain as currently in place and as specified in Schedule B(1) of IPPC Licence Register No P0487-04. There will be no additional emission points as a result of this proposal. The main potential impacts on air quality associated with the existing activities at the site relate to emissions of dust and combustion gases such as SO 2 (sulphur dioxide), NO 2 (nitrogen dioxide) and CO (carbon monoxide). These emissions are currently being monitored as part of the ongoing monitoring programme at the site. In addition, HCl, HF, Heavy Metals and Dioxins and Furans are also measured in the emission stream from the main stack as part of the monitoring requirements. The operation of the plant using the proposed alternative fuels will not lead to the discharge of any additional emissions from the main stack into the atmosphere. All current emissions monitoring will remain in place as required by IPPC Licence Register No P0487-04 and as discussed in detail in Section 9 of the Planning and Environmental Report. Attachment N o F.2 Page 3 of 7

WATER F.2.1 Introduction The main surface water resources in the vicinity of the site are the Kinnegad and Castlejordan Rivers. The Lagan Cement Ltd site lies entirely within the catchment of the Kinnegad River, which forms the northern boundary of part of the site, just north of the shale quarry. The source of the Kinnegad River is located west of the site and the surface water divide between the catchments of the Kinnegad and Castlejordan Rivers lies to the south of the site. The existing cement works and quarry facility is licenced by the EPA and a number of conditions in the IPPC Licence define monitoring requirements for the Operational Phase of the development. The existing ongoing monitoring programme was implemented for the duration of the construction phase of the project and is continuing since cement production commenced. The proposed addition of two new alternative fuels to the fuel list at the facility will also be regulated under the terms of the IPPC Licence. There will be no impacts on the surface water and groundwater at the site as a result of this proposal and there are no proposed changes to the surface water and groundwater management regime at the site. This section outlines the existing operational drainage system and control systems to handle the water discharge at the emission points SW1 and SW2. F.2.2 Major emission point (SW1) OS 257290E, 244605N The major emission point at SW1 comprises all pumped groundwater from the limestone and shale quarry and surface run-off, including treated effluent from the works pond and runoff from the surrounding areas. The water is discharged in the Kinnegad River via an oil trap and the settlement lagoons. The details of abatement/treatments systems, quarry sumps and ongoing monitoring programme are presented below. Surface Water Collection and Handling There are three main sumps used for water management at the site. The terrace sump, which manages surface water run-off in the plant area, the shale quarry sump and the limestone quarry sump which manage groundwater pumped from the two quarries. A flow chart for the storm water and groundwater management at the facility is presented in Appendix I of this report. The terrace sump is located at the northern end of the raw materials reception and handling compound and has a maximum discharge rate of 200m 3 /hr which is controlled by means of a float switch. The 35 x 40 x 3m sump is formed at a low level to avoid two-stage pumping and water from here is pumped via two 160mm pipes to an inlet chamber from where it is gravity fed into the balancing pond. Water is pumped on an as-required basis using a level controlled submersible pump capable of handling inflows in excess of Attachment N o F.2 Page 4 of 7

700l/sec. The sole function of the terrace sump is to pump stormwater from the surface water drains in the main plant yard area and therefore this sump only functions during rainfall. Waters from the balancing pond are gravity fed into the pre-settlement lagoon from where they are fed onto the main settlement lagoon again under gravity. The limestone quarry sump has a maximum discharge rate of 138m 3 /hr, which is controlled by means of a float switch. Water is pumped from the limestone quarry sump on an intermittent basis as required. The limestone quarry sump discharge is pumped to the inlet chamber from where it is gravity fed to the balancing pond. From here it is directed to the pre-settlement lagoon and then onto the settlement lagoon. The shale quarry sump has a maximum discharge rate of 45m 3 /hr and is controlled by means of a float switch. Water is pumped from the shale quarry into a purpose built drain and then flows by gravity into the pre-settlement lagoon and on into the settlement lagoon. Water may be directed to the balancing pond from the shale quarry sump if flow rates from the balancing pond to the settlement lagoons would exceed those which can permit settlement of suspended solids in the settlement lagoons. Surface Water Treatment The balancing pond and the settlement lagoons are the main features of the surface water management system at the site. Balancing Pond The balancing pond receives all water pumped from the terrace sump and the limestone quarry sump and can receive water from the shale quarry sump if and when required. The balancing pond measures 170 x 110 x 4m deep and is designed to accept excess run-off from storm conditions up to a 20 year return storm. The volume of the balancing pond is approximately 35,000m 3 and the top water level is 85.5mAOD and the invert of the discharge pipe is at 82.25mAOD. To be able to function at times of high rainfall, it is necessary for the pond water level generally to be low. The discharge from the balancing pond is regulated by a 52mm diameter throttle plate attached to the outflow pipe. Oil traps are installed to intercept any potential on-site spillage of hydrocarbons. The water from the balancing pond flows under gravity to the pre settlement lagoon in a 225mm drainpipe. Water from the balancing pond flows at a rate not exceeding 109m³/hr (for the 20 year storm) and at a mean discharge rate of 75m³/hr (for the same storm). This ensures that excess water during storms can be regulated in discharge to the settlement lagoons whilst these lagoons are still receiving some pumped ground water. Settlement Lagoons Attachment N o F.2 Page 5 of 7

The settlement lagoons are located just north of the shale quarry and discharge into the Kinnegad River at the emission point SW1. The volume of the presettlement lagoon and the settlement lagoon is 35,000m 3 and 70,000m 3 respectively. The settlement lagoons receive water pumped directly from the sumps of the two quarries and from the balancing pond. The maximum permitted discharge rate from the settlement lagoons to the Kinnegad River is 260m³/hr or 6150m³/d (71 l/s). The design residence time in the settlement lagoons is 28 hrs. The final discharge to SW1 is via a pipe from the overflow weir. An oil interceptor is installed to remove oils and hydrocarbons from all inflow. The minimum daily discharge to the Kinnegad River will be solely that from groundwater pumping during periods of drought viz 3,520m 3 /d (after 38 years). The routings of surface water run-off either via the works sumps, balancing pond and settlement lagoons or via the quarry sumps and the settlement lagoons are such that it is most unlikely that significant increases in discharge will arrive at SW1 until 48 hours after a heavy end-of-drought rainfall. After prolonged drought it is likely that the quarry sumps receiving surface water run-off would be low having been used to provide water for dust suppression. Hence, increased discharges into the Kinnegad River, following heavy rainfall, should correspond to a parallel increase in river flow. The maximum controlled rate of discharge of both surface water and pumped groundwater is 6150m³/d. The mean surface water and pumped groundwater flow will be 5,040m3/d (after 38 years). Mean discharges will normally occur during normal periods of rainfall and not during droughts. Flow from the settlement lagoons to the Kinnegad River (emission point SW1) are continuously monitored and when this exceeds 256m³/hr water from one or both of the quarries, is switched automatically to feed into the balancing pond. For storms beyond the 20 year return period water would be allowed to rise in one or both of the quarries. Therefore, the outlet from the settlement lagoon acts as a hydrobrake, designed to flood at the balancing pond and the settlement lagoons in the event that storm flow and pump rates from the quarries exceed the discharge limit. Surface Water Monitoring The water at the emission point SW1 is sampled with a flow proportional sampler with 24-hour composite samples being collected. An automatic ph sensor is also installed at the emission point. The ph of the discharge water should always lie in the range 6 to 9. Daily samples are also tested for suspended solids. Discharge BOD is recorded weekly. Mineral Oil presence is checked visually on a daily basis and oils, fats and greases are recorded monthly as required by the terms and conditions of the IPPC Licence. If (as is considered unlikely) dirty water discharges above the limit of 35mg/l, an automatic diversion system for flow through the attenuation pond will be installed. This will be triggered by means of a calibrated photocell control. Attachment N o F.2 Page 6 of 7

F.2.3 Minor emission point (SW2) OS 266535E, 242705N The minor emission point at SW2 comprises surface water runoff from fields and permanent seeded/planted screening banks from the southwestern part of the site. Runoff from the screening banks is collected in perimeter ditches and routed to a combined silt/oil trap facility. A controlled flow of 7l/s discharges into the westerly flowing ditch via the minor emission SW2. Storm attenuation area The area lying east of the silt and oil interceptor is allowed to flood to a maximum depth of 0.8m over a maximum area of 88 x 176m in order to attenuate storm flow. Bunding was installed around the perimeter of the plant area as a flood prevention measure. The discharge at SW2 will not exceed 600m³/d and will be c 100m³/d for mean surface water run-off. Operational and monitoring arrangements The surface water emitted at SW2 does not comprise any process effluent or runoff from working or quarry areas. The emitted water only comprises runoff generated from greenfield and woodland. No abatement /control systems is therefore required for this emission point. However, as a matter of precaution a silt/oil trap was installed upstream from the emission point. The discharge at this emission point is usually at a very slow rate with a near static water at many of the ditches connected to the outflow for the site. Attachment N o F.2 Page 7 of 7