Rapid National Model Assessments to Support US Conservation Policy Planning Mike White

Similar documents
Development of Sediment and Nutrient Export Coefficients for US Ecoregions.

Modeling the Impacts of Agricultural Conservation Strategies on Water Quality in the Des Moines Watershed

Modeling Sediment and Nutrient Loads Input to Great Lakes and Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Water Quality

Modeling the Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Water Quality in the Pacific Northwest Basin

Modeling Sediment and Nutrient Loads Input to Chesapeake Bay and Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Water Quality

History of Model Development at Temple, Texas. J. R. Williams and J. G. Arnold

SWAT modeling of Arroyo Colorado watershed

Multi-Objective Optimization Tool for the Selection and Placement of BMPs for Pesticide (Atrazine) Control

Cost-effective Allocation of Conservation Practices using Genetic Algorithm with SWAT

NUTRIENT TRACKING TOOL

Hydrologic and Water Quality of Climate Change in the Ohio-Tennessee River Basin

The Potential Role for Nitrogen Compliance in Mitigating Gulf Hypoxia. Marc Ribaudo Economic Research Service

SWAT Check. A screening tool to assist users in the identification of potential model application problems Mike White, Jeff Arnold, and Jimmy Williams

Optimal distribution of conservation practices in the Upper Washita River basin, Oklahoma. Edward Osei 1

Simulated Nitrogen Loading from Corn, Sorghum, and Soybean Production in the Upper Mississippi Valley

Philip W. Gassman, CARD, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

Modeling the Influence of Agricultural Practices on Watershed Export of Phosphorus

Nitrate Load Reduction Strategies for the Raccoon and Des Moines Rivers. Keith Schilling, Calvin Wolter Iowa DNR Geological and Water Survey

Comprehensive Watershed Modeling for 12- digit HUC Priority Watersheds Phase II

Modeling Nutrient and Sediment Losses from Cropland D. J. Mulla Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota

Assessment of large-scale bioenergy cropping scenarios for the Upper Mississippi and Ohio-Tennessee River Basins

Modeling soil P. Case study focusing on the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and ongoing research. Margaret Kalcic, Grey Evenson, Rebecca Muenich

NUTRIENT TRACKING TOOL (NTT: 2 ND GEN.): AN APEX INTERFACE & A TOOL TO EVALUATE THE ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF FARM MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

Water Quality Impacts of Agricultural BMPs in a Suburban Watershed in New Jersey

MODELING PHOSPHORUS LOADING TO THE CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR USING SWAT

Modeling watershed nutrient fluxes & delivery to coastal waters. Pennsylvania State University. Collaborators

Development of a tool to estimate Best Management Practices (BMP) efficiency using SWAT

Soil and Water Assessment Tool. R. Srinivasan Texas A&M University

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative

C-SWAT: An Easy Way to Save SWAT Computational Time by Consolidating Input Files

Jeff Arnold and the SWAT Conservation Assessment Team. Current status and future directions in. watershed modeling

Refined Pesticide Exposure Modeling for Endangered Species in Flowing Water Habitats

Planting and Harvesting Crops

Understanding Water-Human interaction through an Intelligent Digital Watershed: Initial development and Implementation

Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy: Background Information

Coupling Bioenergy Production and. Distributed Modeling Approach

2010 Growing Season - Barton County, Kansas Land Cover Summary

Evaluating the Least Cost Selection of Agricultural Management Practices in the Fort Cobb Watershed

Biophysical, Environmental and Economic Aspects of Rapid Land-Use Change in the Northern Great Plains

Agricultural Model Data Inputs and Assumptions: Presentation to the Water Quality GIT October, 2014

Columbia, Missouri. Contents

Mapping Groundwater Recharge Rates Under Multiple Future Climate Scenarios in Southwest Michigan

2010 Growing Season - Cowley County, Kansas Land Cover Summary

Evaluation of climate and land use changes on hydrologic processes in the Salt River Basin, Missouri, United States

Protocol for Calibration of River Basins using SWAT

Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in SPARROW Models Richard B. Alexander

A Brief Overview of U.S. Agricultural Conservation Policy

Integrating Agricultural Land Management into a Watershed Response Model

Joint Research Centre (JRC)

Hydrologic Modeling of Cedar Creek Watershed using SWAT

Field-Scale Targeting of Cropland Sediment Yields Using ArcSWAT

Little River Watershed Conservation Practice Assessment with SWAT. D.D. Bosch, J. Cho, G. Vellidis, R. Lowrance, T. Strickland

Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on N Loads in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin: Supplemental Materials

Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension

Spring Nutrient Flux to the Gulf of Mexico and Nutrient Balance in the Mississippi River Basin

Refined Application of the SWAT Model for Endangered Species Effects Determination

Modeling the Biogeochemistry of Nutrients Flow into Ground and Surface Waters and Air from Agroecosystems

Growing Crops for Biofuels Has Spillover Effects

MODELING CARBON CHANGES IN AGRICULTURAL SOILS

Watershed Modeling of Haw River Basin using SWAT for Hydrology, Water Quality and Climate Change Study

Groundwater and Agricultural Bioenergy

TILLAGE PRACTICES IN KANSAS: 2010 SURVEY RESULTS

Improved Simulation of Soil and. Manure Phosphorus Loss in SWAT

Great Lakes Tributary Modeling

2010 Growing Season - Harvey County, Kansas Land Cover Summary

Development of a watershed modelling approach to assess the impacts of biofuel feedstock on water quality in the Upper Mississippi River Basin

Models Overview: Purposes and Limitations

Evaluation of Alternative Cropping and Nutrient Management Systems with Soil and Water Assessment Tool for the Raccoon River Watershed Master Plan

Presented by: Andrew Craig DNR Nonpoint Source Planning Coordinator Nov 2016 National NPS Conference Boston, MA

An Environmental Accounting System to Track Nonpoint Source Phosphorus Pollution in the Lake Champlain Basin. Year 2 Project Work Plan

What is SWAT? SWAT GI-LID Module

Analyzing water resources in a monsoon-driven environment an example from the Indian Western Ghats

Targeting Best Management in Contrasting Watersheds

Comparative analysis of SWAT model with Coupled SWAT-MODFLOW model for Gibbs Farm Watershed in Georgia

Agricultural Systems Modeling: Challenges and Opportunities

Executive Summary. 1.1 Case Study Question

Multi-site evaluation of APEX for crop and grazing land in the Heartland region of the US

Energy Inputs for 1 st and 2 nd Generation Ethanol Feedstocks: Modeling Effects of Cultivation Practices and Crop Selection on GHG Emissions

Agriculture Energy Management Plan, Landscape Criteria - Practice/Activity Code (124) (No.)

Assessing Regional Water Impacts of Biofuel Production Scenarios

APPENDIX D. PARAMETER VALUES FOR MAJOR AGRICULTURAL CROPS AND TILLAGE OPERATIONS

Soils Characterize how legacy nutrients (especially legacy P) impact nutrient losses from agricultural lands. 59,60,61,62

Incorporating Ecosystem Services into Monarch. Buffer Strips. Habitat Restoration Planning using Riparian

Using Using Modeling Modeling and and Online Online T ools Im Implement plemen Outc Out ome Based Conser vation in the the Saginaw Bay

Assessment of Scenarios for the Boone River Watershed in North Central Iowa

Coping strategies with agrometeorological risks and uncertainties for water erosion, runoff and soil loss

Phosphorus Risk Assessment Index Evaluation Using Runoff Measurements

A Presentation of the 2012 Drainage Research Forum. November 20, 2012 Farmamerica, Waseca MN

contribution of SWAT modelling to integrated land use governance

Toward a Great Lakes Watershed Ecological Sustainability Strategy (GLWESS): Modeling Workshop. Lansing, MI May 3, 2012

WDNR - Using Snap-Plus to Quantify Phosphorus Trading Credits ( )

Availability of Biomass Feedstocks in the Appalachian Region

To provide timely, accurate, and useful statistics in service to U.S. agriculture

What Does the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Mean for Water Quality in Illinois?

A Model Integration Framework for Assessing Integrated Landscape Management Strategies

Adapting SWAT for Riparian Wetlands in Ontario Watershed. Amanjot Singh, Ramesh Rudra and Wanhong Yang University of Guelph

Strategies for nitrate reduction: The Cedar River Case Study

Blanchard Watershed Modeling

RESEARCH. AFREC Research Projects. htm

FROM THE MARKET TO THE FIELD: THE IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENERGY LINKAGES ON FARMERS' CHOICES

Transcription:

Rapid National Model Assessments to Support US Conservation Policy Planning Mike White USDA-ARS Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 1

Topics Current National Assessments Future National Assessments Supporting Data and Tools Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 2

US National Assessments CEAP - Conservation Effects Assessment Project Justify US conservation expenditures (about 2 billion annually) Quantitative predictions of water quality improvements 18 river basins simulated using SWAT and APEX Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 3

CEAP Framework Cultivated Agriculture NRI Survey Data Other Landuses Public Data APEX SWAT Predicted Load Predicted Load SWAT Routing Delivered Load Prediction Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 4

Rapid - CEAP Purpose Rapidly respond to congressional inquiries Support US Farm Bill development Approach Identical to CEAP Structure Integrate 18 river basin models into a single model 2,200 subbasins 45,000 HRUs Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 5

Calibration Streamflow (Surface runoff and Baseflow) calibrated at the 8 digit level to USGS estimated runoff Automated calibration using CEAP software Sediment and Nutrients Calibrated to individual estimated loads at ~ 100 sites Automatic calibration using heuristic algorithms USGS Interpolated Runoff and Baseflow USGS Gages with Flow, Sediment and Nutrient Loads Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 6

Predicted Streamflow and Sediment Yield Green Low Red - High Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 7

Predicted Nutrient Yields Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 8

Load Allocation Results Mississippi River total loads to Gulf of Mexico Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 9

Beyond CEAP (ECLIPS) Environmental and Conservation on Landscapes for Integrated Policy Scenarios Remove dependency on proprietary data Increase spatial resolution 2,200 Subbasins (HUC 8) to 80,000 (HUC 12) Improve calibration data Rapidly incorporate new data Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 10

ECLIPS Framework Research Configuration Public Data Public Data Optional Configuration NRI Survey Data Complete SWAT Model Partial SWAT Model APEX Field Level Delivered Load Prediction Complete Model SWAT Routing Delivered Load Prediction Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 11

National Model Inputs Derived from CEAP (Except Cultivated Ag) Subbasin & Reach Properties Pasture and Range Management Urban and Forest Management Climate Point Sources Agricultural Crop Fractions Cropland Data Layer CDL Management Fertilizer Tillage Management Operation Planting Harvest Dates Tillage Dates and Implements Irrigation Tile Drains Manure Application Reservoirs National Inventory of Dams Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 12

Agricultural Crops 2009 CDL Data Reclassified from 256 categories Corn Small grains Cotton Vegetables Soybeans Sorghum Fallow Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 13

Fertilizer Application Rates Derived from Agricultural Census Yield and Fertilizer use data 1990-2010 Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 14

Tillage Practices USGS Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC) Survey Data Types Conventional Ridge Reduced Mulch No-Till Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 15

Management RUSLE2 20,000 Templates Converter Checker RUSLE2 Management Extensive Conversion Cropping Assumptions Plants Kills Harvests Fertilization 6,000 mgt converted SWAT Format Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 16

Large Models Rapid Execution Currently 2,200 subbasins 45,000 HRU Future 80,000 subbasins 2 million HRUs Parallel Processing is REQUIRED Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 17

Parallelizing SWAT 2 Approaches Parallelize the model Not Readily Compatible with Existing Architecture Parallelize the problem No code changes Windows Cluster 45,000 HRU model run for 37 Years takes 15 min Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 18

Quality Control - SWAT Checker Models are Difficult to Check BAD INPUT DATA OR IMPROPER CALIBRATION CAN CAUSE PROBLEMS Identify Model Outputs out of Normal Ranges. Show Visual Representations of Model Outputs Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 19

Acknowledgements The Temple CEAP Team A National USDA Effort NRCS ARS NASS Texas A&M & Other Universities Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 20

Questions and Comments? Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX 21