Anticoagulant Rodenticides and Wildlife. Stella McMillin California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Investigations Laboratory

Similar documents
Rodenticide Types. Rodenticides, Regulations, & Labels. Rodenticides by Regulation 2/22/2018. Anticoagulant Use in California

Environmental Problems from Marijuana Cultivation on Public Lands. Stella McMillin California Department of Fish and Wildlife

NOTICE OF PROPOSED REGULATORY ACTION

Risk Mitigation Decision for Ten Rodenticides. May 28, 2008

Risk Mitigation Measures for Eight Rodenticides


Guidelines for the safe use of. Anticoagulant Rodenticides by professional users

EU Biocides Regulation 528/2012 (EU BPR)

MINUTES VERTEBRATE PEST CONTROL RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Four Points By Sheraton, 1050 Schooner Drive Ventura, California October 7, 2009

RISK MITIGATION MEASURES FOR ANTICOAGULANT RODENTICIDES AS BIOCIDAL PRODUCTS. Final report

Meadow Voles. Are they taking over the world?! Ronda Hirnyck University of Idaho Extension Pesticide Specialist

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

An Historical Perspective of Pesticides and the Endangered Species Act, with Suggestions

Background Information 3. Who should attend the course? & Course Outline 5. Aims and Objectives 6. The Examination 7

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION TECHNICAL SERIES 23

international Technical Technical Monograph 2003

RRAC guidelines on Anticoagulant Rodenticide Resistance Management

Living Things Need Energy

Proposed Acceptability for Continuing Registration

THE STATUS OF BROMADIOLONE IN THE UNITED STATES

PREPARED FOR NZ Regional Council Biosecurity Managers DATE: 3rd July 2009

STRUCTURAL PESTICIDE USE IN NEW JERSEY: 2005 SURVEY

HABITAT MEANS HOME. Habitat Means Home. Grade 4 Curriculum Guide. S. DANGERFIELD Interpretive Planning

Barrettine Environmental Health. Product Launch: REVOLUTIONARY TECHNOLOGY FOR RODENT CONTROL

Anticoagulant resistance in the Norway rat and Guidelines for the management of resistant rat infestations in the UK

Environmental Intelligence, LLC. Development.

CRRU UK CODE OF BEST PRACTICE. Best Practice and Guidance for Rodent Control and the Safe Use of Rodenticides

Neogen Dealer Solutions: Are Rodents Ruining Your Customer s Return?

Product Guide Rodenticides & Bait Stations

EUROPE S BIOCIDAL PRODUCTS DIRECTIVE: BENEFITS AND COSTS IN URBAN PEST MANAGEMENT

AN UPDATE ON TOOLS FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF POCKET GOPHERS IN ALFALFA. Roger A. Baldwin, Ryan Meinerz, and Steve B.

Non-Predator Vertebrate Pest Damage In California Agriculture: An Assessment Of Economic Impacts In Selected Crops

Animal Damage: Species Accounts. Gregory A. Giusti Chair Animal Damage Committee University of California Cooperative Extension

Leaves rats, mice and the competition for dead.

Vertebrate Pest Control Research Advisory Committee

Using PUR Data and the PRiME Tool To Assess Pest Management Practices

The Basics: Objectives

CARRIZO PLAIN PLANNING UNIT Carrizo Plain

Environmental fate and residual persistence of brodifacoum in wildlife Envirolink Advice Grant 884-HBRC131

Pest Control Storing and Using Chemicals

ALAMEDA COUNTY CDA PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT PROJECT UPDATE INFORMATION ONLY

Control Of Rats Resistant To Second-Generation Anticoagulant Rodenticides

Wildlife Connectivity Assessment

Name: Cause and Effect

- Every creatures has a role to play in an ecosystem. - The role an organism plays in its environment is called its niche, and includes...

ALBERTA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION

Sheep and Goats Predator Loss

Farmer Pesticide Certificate Home Study Course. Exterior Rodent Control

Warfarin Resistance Revisited

City of Novato Integrated Pest Management Policy

EPA UPDATE ON VERTEBRATE PESTICIDES

Re: Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Rosamond Solar Array Project by First Solar, Inc. (PP10231)

Neonicotinoids Special Registration Review. Raj Mann, Ph.D.

VERTEBRATE PESTS LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Oak Knob 2016 and Gainor 2016 Trespass Grow Site Complexes Reclamation Operation Synopsis

- 1 - I D E N T I F I C A T I O N O F C H E M I C A L P R E P A R A T I O N A N D C O M P A N Y

ANIMAL ADAPTATIONS: Secrets of Survival in Ohio s Habitats

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

Herbicides and the Environment: Understanding Toxicity. Tim Miller WSU NWREC, Mount Vernon WA

Using Pesticides in California

Ecosystem Markets Primer T.J Mascia Troutman Sanders, LLP

Annual Conference Resolutions Packet

10, Contiguous Acres Merced, Fresno, and San Benito Counties Narbaitz Cattle Ranch

Chapter 7 Response to Comments

Facts About Pesticides, Salmon, and the Endangered Species Act

The Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project

Anticoagulant Rodenticides in Three Owl Species from Western Canada,

HCP Development: Key Aspects of Conservation Planning

Use of Anticoagulant Rodenticides in Single- Family Neighborhoods Along an Urban-Wildland Interface in California

Technical Monograph A Reappraisal of Blood Clotting Response Tests for Anticoagulant Resistance and a proposal for a standardised.

CONTRAC RODENTICIDE RTU PLACE PAC

Three Federal Pesticide Injunctions for Protection of Endangered Species

FIFRA and the ESA: Reconciling the Differences

DITRAC. 4 lbs (4.1 kg) NET WT: CAUTION ALL-WEATHER BLOX KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN PEANUT FLAVORED KILLS NORWAY RATS, ROOF RATS AND HOUSE MICE

The Importance of Aluminum Phosphide for Burrowing Pest Control in California

John Kough, Ph.D. Office Of of Pesticide P rograms Programs

ACVM - REGISTRATION STANDARD FOR TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY

Potential Impacts of Court-Ordered Injunctions on Pesticide Use and the Protection of Endangered Species

Birds and Wind Energy Guidance Supporting the transition towards a truly sustainable green energy

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Look at page 136, this is your homework due next class.

Goals of This Orientation

Common Assessment Cycle 2 Study Guide. 1. A producer gets energy from and converts it into food.

PESTICIDE USE BY THE FEDERAL/ COOPERATIVE ANIMAL DAMAGE CONTROL (ADC) PROGRAM,

Adaptations and Food Webs

Canadian export to Nepal: Terad 3 Ag for pest control. Sydney Teasdale

Persistence of four anticoagulant rodenticides in the livers of laboratory rats

Whitewater Unit Oil Exploration and Development Project EA

NREX is intended to provide useful, landscape-level information during the early stages of project planning. 10:48:08 AM 1:72,223.

VERTEBRATE PEST CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT MATERIALS

PERIMETER FENCE. Marine Mammals Perimeter fence must: [3.103(c)]

A Quick! Review of Anadromous Fish, Marijuana Growing, and the Watersheds At Risk

How Organisms Obtain Energy. Section Objectives. The producers: Autotrophs. The producers: Autotrophs. The consumers: Heterotrophs

Risk Assessment-- Testing the Probability of Harm

SINGLE-FEED RODENTICIDE

Food Chains and Food Webs

Chagas Disease Ecology in Texas: A Look at Geographic Distribution of Vector Species and Parasite Strains

FEDERAL LAW AND VERTEBRATE PEST CONTROL

LAWSUIT TO PROTECT SALMON FROM PESTICIDES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

Transcription:

Anticoagulant Rodenticides and Wildlife Stella McMillin California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Investigations Laboratory

Pesticide Investigations CDFW Wildlife Investigations Laboratory Investigate morality incidents Report findings to the USEPA, Department of Pesticide Regulation, County Agricultural Commissioners

What are Anticoagulant Rodenticides? Cause death by interfering with blood clotting mechanism Several days from exposure to death Persistent in body tissue High potential for secondary exposure

Two different kinds of ARs. 1 st Generation (FGAR) Multiple feedings Less persistent in tissues Commensal and outdoor use Chlorophacinone, diphacinone, warfarin 2 nd Generation (SGAR) Intended for single feeding (more toxic) More persistent in tissue Registered only for commensal use Brodifacoum, bromadiolone, difethialone, difenacoum

Two different kinds of ARs. 2 nd Generation (SGAR) Intended for single feeding (more toxic) More persistent in tissue Registered only for commensal use Brodifacoum, bromadiolone, difethialone

First the SGARs

Background In the early 1990 s, DFW began receiving animals with signs of anticoagulant toxicosis. Symptoms include unexplained bleeding in the body cavities and subcutaneously and lack of clotting in blood. Mostly result of secondary exposure. In 1999, DFW requested that DPR place products with brodifacoum in re-evaluation based on 58 cases of exposure. USEPA was also considering issue so no action by DPR.

Anti-Coagulants Residues in Wildlife (1992-2000) Brodifacoum (66%) Bromadiolone (19%) Diphacinone (8%) Chlorophacinone (7%) Difethialone (1%)

Persistence of anticoagulants in liver tissue (USEPA) Brodifacoum: 217 days Bromadiolone: 248 days Difethialone: 118 days Diphacinone: 90 days Warfarin: 35 days

Acute Oral Toxicity of Anticoagulants to Dogs (LD50 values in mg ai/kg) Brodifacoum: 0.25-1 Bromadiolone: 8.1 Difethialone: 4 Chlorophacinone: 50 100 Diphacinone: 3 15 Warfarin: 20-50

Acute Oral Toxicity of Anticoagulants to Birds (LD50 values in mg ai/kg) Brodifacoum: 0.26-10 Difethialone: 0.26 Bromadiolone: 138-170 Chlorophacinone: 100-430 Diphacinone: 400-3158 Warfarin: 620-2150

Acute Oral Toxicity of Anticoagulants to Cats (LD50 values in mg ai/kg) Brodifacoum: 25 Difethialone: 16 Bromadiolone: 25 Diphacinone: 5-15 Warfarin: 2.5-20

Necropsies of Anticoagulant Cases

How do we diagnose AR toxicosis? Signs of coagulopathy (abnormal bleeding) without signs of trauma. Concentration of AR in liver.

Interpretation can be difficult Often more than 1 kind of AR. Persistent in liver don t know when exposure(s) occurred. Each AR has its own toxicological profile for different species. Gross necropsy doesn t tell the whole story. Other stressors (disease, trauma, starvation)

Species Impacted Golden Eagle Great-horned Owl Barn Owl Red-tailed Hawk Red-shouldered Hawk Cooper s Hawk American Kestrel Turkey Vulture Canada Goose Black bear Fisher Red Fox Gray Fox SJ Kit Fox Coyote Mountain Lion Bobcat Kangaroo Rat Raccoon Badger Wild Pig

Summary of Mortality Data Current list contains over 350 mortality incidents. Mortality database under-represents number of wildlife impacted.

Monitoring Studies Confirm Widespread Exposure 79% of San Joaquin Kit Foxes in Bakersfield had been exposed to ARs. Mountain Lions and Bobcats: 90% of bobcats, all of mt lions tested in Southern California (Riley, 2007). Raptors (Lima and Salmon, 2010): In San Diego 49/53 detections. In Central Valley 37/43 detections. Fishers (Mourad Gabriel, UCDavis): 79% had AR detections.

Conclusions from Mortality and Monitoring Data Widespread AR exposure to predators and scavengers Mortalities caused by exposure Sublethal impacts? Multiple exposure scenarios: Urban, Rural, Wilderness Illegal/Legal Use?

Illegal Sources (Gabriel 2012)

ARs at 1 site (Gabriel 2012) 1.5 lbs found and removed 6.5 lbs empty containers Enough to kill 9000 mice Enough to kill 4-21 fishers

The Regulatory Battlefield: USEPA 2008: USEPA Risk Mitigation Decision: SGARs not available to general consumer. 3 companies sued USEPA USEPA moved to cancel noncompliant products. D-con sued. Still available over the counter while USEPA holds cancellation hearing. First time in 20 years a company has not complied!

The Regulatory Battlefield: California

Rural Exposure Risks Loophole: SGAR availability at farm stores in large packages (>8 lbs) for use inside and around ag buildings. FGARs restricted use for field applications: easier to obtain SGARs Rural exposure likely route for bobcats, mtn lions

CDFW Recommendation CDFW recommended in 2011 that Department of Pesticide Regulation make SGARs Restricted Use Materials (need a license to buy or use). The goal of this recommendation is to prevent the public from buying these products at farm stores (and other retail outlets). Available only to certified applicators.

Regulation Change CDPR agreed with our recommendation Restricted use materials Decrease allowable distance from structures Regulation change: July 2014 D-con lawsuit

Contra Costa County 2013 6 investigations of wildlife losses All raptors

2013 Contra Costa losses Species Cause of Death Pesticides Detected Red-tailed hawk Probable AR Brodifacoum 0.32 ppm Red-tailed hawk (7) Not determined None Red-shouldered hawk AR Brodifacoum 0.39 ppm Barn owl AR Brodfacoum 0.017 ppm Red-shouldered hawk AR Brodifacoum 0.52 ppm Red-shouldered hawk AR Brodifacoum 0.4 ppm

Now FGARs

The Question of FGARs SGARs clearly a threat to non-target wildlife. FGARs less clear. Greater toxicity than mammals to birds. Mortalities not common. Exposure more common in felids and canids than raptors. Sub-lethal impacts?

Detections of FGARs: 2013 (DFW only) 42/43 animals tested contained ARs 40/43 brodifacoum 10/43 diphacinone (mt lions, bobcats, gray fox, DKF, coyote, CSO). All had other ARs as well. 1/43 warfarin (mt lion)

UCLA s Study Bobcats in Orange and LA County Sampled blood in ~200 bobcats ~30% had diphacinone exposure Liver samples were more likely to show SGARs. Possible connection to mange.

Monitoring for First Generation ARs SJKF: 10% Raptor: 0-2% Bobcats: 31% Fishers: Diphacinone: 15-18% Chlorophacinone: 8-12%

Use Trends: FGARs 120 100 80 60 Chlorophacinone Diphacinone 40 20 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Other Rodenticides Other rodenticides are also toxic to vertebrates Burrow fumigants may kill everything in burrow. Acute toxicants can kill non-target wildlife (strychnine, bromethalin).

What s in that burrow?

USEPA s Comparative Analysis Mortality (secondary hazard to birds and mammals) Blood retention Liver retention

USEPA s Risk Model High Risk Lower Risk Brodifacoum Zinc Phosphide Difethialone Diphacinone Bromadiolone Chlorophacinone Cholecalciferol Warfarin Bromethalin

What can we do? Monitoring. Careful use practices. Reporting and investigating. Tinkering with old tools and developing new ones. Increased regulation when necessary.

Working together, we can protect wildlife! QuickTime and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.