Collaborative Opportunities to Restore Wetland Functions in an Urbanized Setting: Moses Creek Restoration Case Study

Similar documents
THE NEW WETLAND RULES How do they affect you? City Engineers Conference January 27, 2010

Public Notice ISSUED: May 21, 2013 EXPIRES: June 20, 2013

Public Notice ISSUED: November 7, 2018 EXPIRES: December 7, 2018

Recommended Wetland Management Standards According to Management Class

SECTION 10: WETLANDS PROTECTION

Public Notice ISSUED: October 16, 2017 EXPIRES: November 15, 2017

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

IDEM Wetlands and Streams Regulatory Overview. An overview of IDEM permitting for work in Waters of the State

A Holistic Approach to. Wetland Ecosystem Restoration. and Stewardship

RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL CITY CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANCR INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES SUMMARY: 2/11/04 WATER RESOURCES GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Wetland Identification/Delineation and Bog Turtle Habitat Screening Report for. S.R. 0097, Section 003 Two Taverns Bridge Replacement over Littles Run

PRESENTERS. Contact Information: RW Armstrong Union Station, 300 S. Meridian St. Indianapolis, IN

Water Quality Buffers for Waters and Wetlands

A GUIDE TO THE WETLAND, DEEPWATER HABITATS, AND RIPARIAN CLASSIFICATIONS USED IN WETLAND AND RIPARIAN MAPPING IN MONTANA

Mukwonago River Watershed Protection Plan Recommendations & Implementation Update Friends of Mukwonago River March 16, 2013 Mukwonago, WI

in many places been converted to disturbance vegetation, such as

Constructing Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Design Considerations & Strategies for Success

SW-74 SERENOVA PRESERVE SITES 2, 3, 4, 8 MITIGATION PLAN

719 Griswold, Suite 820 Detroit, MI DANVERS POND DAM REMOVAL AND STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT

Atlasof Biodiversity

Public Input Meeting. Proposed Central New York Wetland Mitigation Bank. March 20, 2017

NJDEP Regulations that impact or soon will impact agricultural operations. April 1, 2007 Horses 2007

Public Notice ISSUED: EXPIRES:

Performance Standards for Target Hydrology

Kevin L. Erwin CE PWS Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc Bayside Parkway Ft. Myers, Florida USA

Public Notice ISSUED: May 16, 2014 EXPIRES: May 30, 2014

SEDGES ON THE EDGES: THE WETLAND LAKE CONNECTION. Tom Bernthal Pat Trochlell Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Stream and Watershed Restoration Design and Quantitative Benefits. Kelly Gutshall, RLA and Mike LaSala

RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

Riparian Buffer Requirements. Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management

STREAM RESTORATION PURPOSE, PRACTICE, AND METHODS. By Marcus Rubenstein, CPESC

5.15 Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S.

Maintaining Riparian Areas and Wetlands

Discuss. With the members of your table, discuss these two questions and come up with a list:

Municipal Stadium Wetland

Lockport Prairie a watershed canary PHOTO OPTIONAL

CITY OF AUSTIN'S REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR CREEK PROTECTION

Community. Restoration. Prevention.

TABLE OF CONTENTS. TOC-i

Illinois DNR Conservation Ecosystems Program Project Grant Application for FY 2008

Incorporating Restoration Planning and Transportation Controls into the Valley Creek Watershed Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan

Errata sheet for the Connecticut General Permits May 2, 2017

Presentation to the Root River Restoration Planning Group May 29, 2013

Wetlands. DuPage County Stormwater Ordinance Update- Wetlands and Buffers. Is a Stormwater Permit Required? 7/13/2012

Public Notice ISSUED: 5/6/2014 EXPIRES: 6/5/2014

Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

RIPARIAN AREAS REGULATION

No. 6 December, Wisconsin s Forestry Best Management Practices for Water Quality Forest Roads

INFORMATION FOR SECOND REEVALUTION AND SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS

2.4 Floodplain Restoration Principles

Public Notice ISSUED: August 11, 2015 EXPIRES: September 10, 2015

Errata sheet for the Connecticut General Permits March 26, 2019

Stevenson Creek Watershed Plan and Project Implementation

Water and Watersheds. Data Maps Action

Using Airborne Imagery, GIS & Remote Sensing for Ecological Monitoring and Mapping

CITY OF NEW WESTMINSTER. Bylaw No. 7033, 2005 RIPARIAN AREAS PROTECTION BYLAW

DA Permit SAJ Attachment G - Compensatory Mitigation Plan Attachment A, Part 3 - Mitigation Categories

Alabama s Best Management Practices

FACTSHEET INTRODUCTION. help rebalance the water cycle, mitigate the effects of climate change and improve human health and livelihoods.

Public Notice ISSUED: 22 October 2018 EXPIRES: 21 November 2018

CEMVR-OD-P WETLAND COMPENSATORY MITIGATION BANK PROPOSAL

Snitz Creek Park Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Engineering District 8-0

Section V.H. Fresh Water Resources

COTTONWOOD CREEK RECLAMATION PHASE I & II

Chapter 6: Land Use/Land Cover

Monitoring Report #3 Kenston Lake Stream Restoration Bainbridge, Ohio

Compensatory Mitigation Plan Requirements For Permittee Responsible Mitigation Projects St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers May 2010

Town of Fremont Wetland Evaluation Report

TOTAL: 5,250 acres over next 20 years 3

(TXRAM) Overview and Applications Strategies. John Wooten James A. Thomas, PWS, CWB

Watershed Improvements

Natural and Engineered Wetlands for Stormwater Management

2015 Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Reserve Wetlands Program

ALABAMA S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. Protection of Water Quality During Timber Harvesting

Dane County Wetlands Resource Management Guide

Crow s Foot Conservation Area Feasibility Study

SECONDARY WETLAND IMPACTS ANALYSIS

S.R. 4007, Section 14B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosure C Description of Aquatic Habitat

Riparian Restoration on California's Coast November 3, Reach scale

Multi-Scale Monitoring of Potential Groundwater Withdrawal Impacts Using Delineation Methodology; Lower Platte River, Nebraska

2015 Monitoring Report Year 2 Harmon Property Stream Restoration Aurora, Ohio. Corps Permit Number Prepared by:

OVERVIEW 2016 FIVE STAR & URBAN WATERS GRANT PROGRAM. January 7, 2016 NIRPC EMPC Meeting

Logan River at Rendezvous Park, Channel and Floodplain Restoration: Crack Willow (Salix fragilis) Issues and Management Strategies

BMP No. 3 Streamside Management Zones

Ditches in North Carolina

Wetlands, Function & Value:

CONCEPTUAL COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN for wetland losses

Information for File #MVP MVM

Boardman River Townships Project EAST BAY TOWNSHIP. WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN Fall 2009

Bluff Creek One Water

DRAFT UPDATE TO THE 2002 INTERAGENCY GUIDELINES FOR WETLAND COMPENSATORY MITIGATION IN WISCONSIN (GUIDELINES)

Anacostia River Watershed Restoration Plan. Paint Branch Subwatershed Provisional Restoration Project Inventory

Charlotte Harbor SWIM Plan Update Proposed Quantifiable Objectives and Management Actions, January 2019

Margaret Walls. RFF First Wednesday Seminar. Green Infrastructure: Using Natural Landscapes for Flood Mitigation and Water Quality Improvements

RIVERSIDE OXBOW FORT WORTH, TEXAS CHAPTER 3 IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES

Water Quality Stewardship Plan (WaQSP)

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

MN CREP CP23 and CP23A

Riparian Setback- What is that and what should I be doing? October 25th, 2016 Presented by: Anil Tangirala, PE, CFM, ENV SP

Transcription:

Collaborative Opportunities to Restore Wetland Functions in an Urbanized Setting: Moses Creek Restoration Case Study Presented to: SER 2013 World Conference Madison, WI 2013 Award Winner Presented by: Jon Gumtow, PWS, PSS Stantec Consulting Services Green Bay, WI October 8, 2013

Moses Creek Restoration Partners

Site Location Schmeeckle Reserve 280-acre passive recreational and educational facility Operated by UWSP staff and students Part of 26-mile Green Circle Community Trail System Outdoor classroom

Introduction Site History Project Objectives Project Approach Restoration Success

History: Pre-European Settlement Geology Part of Glacial Lake Wisconsin 10,000 years ago Soils Roscommon Muck organic soil over sand Vegetation Sedges, grasses, and marsh vegetation Survey Notes Described as marsh No stream history

History: Post-European Settlement Farm ditching/drainage Flood and Storm water Control Lower 1.3 miles piped to the Wisconsin River

Site Conditions: Pre-Restoration Channelized Ditch Separated from floodplain Adjacent habitats Drained wetlands Early succession forest Glossy Buckthorn Low aquatic habitat value Hydroperiod Intermittent flow regime Supplied by shallow groundwater Dries in late summer Early spring flooding Ice dams

Project Objectives and Opportunities Habitat Restoration Maximize wetland restoration acreage - riparian wet meadow and tall shrub plant communities Naturalize Moses Creek channel within Schmeeckle Reserve Improve flood control by reconnecting creek to wetlands Maintain drainage to adjacent properties Public Involvement/Education Create opportunity for UWSP to incorporate into classroom curricula Educate public about habitat restoration Improve trail user experience Create a trail destination

Project Approach: Public Involvement/Education Local Citizens Public Info Meetings Open Houses Communication with adjacent land owners Presentations to Stevens Point city officials UWSP and WRA College and High School Student Involvement Serve as an outdoor classroom Research/Monitoring

Project Approach: Baseline Studies Soils Drained Hydric Soils Top Soil Depths Hydrology Monitoring Well & Gage Data Vegetation Community Mapping Comprehensive Surveys Wetland Delineation Reference Site Wetland and Stream

Baseline Study Results Hydrology Results 2 Year monitoring period Observations made 3 times/week UWSP Students Well data indicate ground water flows south across site May-June Median groundwater: 1091.0 east and 1089.5 central May-June Median stream stage: 1091.0 east and 1086.5 west Stream gage data shows strong groundwater correlation

Baseline Study Results Stream Assessment Results No stream history Intermittent flows Trapezoidal dug channel No connection to other waterways Debris dams Ave. Width: 5 feet / Depth: 3 inches Low aquatic value

Baseline Study Results Vegetation Results 14 stands comprised of 9 different communities Exotic species infestations Glossy Buckthorn and Reed Canary Grass

Design: Uniting Baseline Studies and Public Use Restore 20 acre riparian meadow and shrub communities Naturalize 4,300 linear feet of Moses Creek Invasive species control within 300 ft buffer (20 acres) Channel and floodplain design to improve flood control Incorporate student involvement and curriculum Provide public access with 1.5 mile trail/boardwalk Enable educational opportunities (signage, website, kiosk)

Project Status Excavation/earthwork completed in Fall 2010. Creation of new stream channels, filling of old channel, creation of floodplain, scrapes 3 years of monitoring indicates hydrology has been restored per design Revegetation Success: Wet Meadow Prairie 360 trees/shrubs Removal of invasive species

Design Goals: Measuring Success Vegetation Surveys 2011 to 2013 Seed Bank Study Increase from 36 to 65 species FQI 13.6 (3 exotic sp.) Carex and Juncus dominant 19 species not seeded 1,300 seeds/sq. meter Low N and C soils values

Design Goals: Measuring Success Groundwater

Keys to Project Success Multidisciplinary technical team Multi-year baseline studies Salvaged topsoil with viable seed bank Project vision from WisDOT, UWSP, City, WDNR, and USACE Public outreach/education (pre and post construction)

2013 Award Winner Thank You