CO 2 Sequestration in Deep Aquifers

Similar documents
Enhanced in Situ Leaching (EISLEACH) Mining by Means of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide - TOUGHREACT Modeling

William Wilmot Matrix Solutions Inc. 118, Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada

CO 2 Geological storage - TOTAL Approach. SCA 2003 Symposium 14/12/2003

Modelling geological storage

Permeability, Flow Rate, and Hydraulic Conductivity Determination for Variant Pressures and Grain Size Distributions

Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide

POTENTIAL FOR GEOLOGICAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION USING DEEP SALINE AQUIFERS IN THE ILLINOIS BASIN

CO 2 Storage in Geological Media

Safety and Monitoring of CO 2 Storage Projects

Science-Based Risk Assessment and Wellbores and in a CO 2 Storage System

SIMULATING MIGRATION OF CO 2 AND CH 4 GENERATED FROM GEOTHERMAL TREATMENT AND BIODEGRADATION OF SANITATION WASTE IN THE DEEP SUBSURFACE

Liability Issues Related to Geological Storage of CO 2

Geological sequestration. or storage of CO 2

FACTSHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST (Rev )

Role of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbon Sequestration The Weyburn Monitoring Project, a case study

Thursday 28 th and Friday 29 th September Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ

POSSIBILITIES OF GEOLOGICAL CO 2 STORAGE IN DEPLETED/PARTIALLY DEPLETED LAYERS OF HYDROCARBONS IN NORTH EAST SLOVENIA

University of Arizona Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Dr. Marek Zreda

Storage 1- Site Selection: Capacity and Injectivity

Fundamentals of modelling CO2 movement underground

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Sequestration in Deep Geological Formations

Effect of Heterogeneity in Capillary Pressure on Buoyancy Driven Flow of CO 2

Current Research Activities

Geological Carbon Sequestration

What to do with CO 2 : The Knowns and Unknowns of Geologic Sequestration and CO 2 EOR in Greenhouse Gas Context

Groundwater basics. Groundwater and surface water: a single resource. Pore Spaces. Simplified View

SEQUESTRATION OF CO 2 IN THE ALTMARK NATURAL GAS FIELD, GERMANY: MOBILITY CONTROL TO EXTEND ENHANCED GAS RECOVERY

Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration

LNAPL migration through soil cement barrier with and without flow condition

Erik Lindeberg and Per Bergmo. SINTEF Petroleum Research, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway

Groundwater and surface water: a single resource. Santa Cruz River, Tucson

Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS): Comparing Water and CO 2 as Heat Transmission Fluids

Storage options 1. Geological storage. CO2 capture and storage Storage options

New Developments: Solved and Unsolved Questions Regarding Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 as a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Method

Accelerating The Dissolution of CO 2 in Aquifers

Is CCS (Geological Storage) Ready for Prime Time?

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in Deep Geological Formations. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geologic Storage

Groundwater Modeling Guidance

Geologic Sequestration Rules: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective

University of Arizona Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Dr. Marek Zreda. HWR431/531 - Hydrogeology Problem set #1 9 September 1998

Effects of CO 2 and acid gas injection on enhanced gas recovery and storage

BELL CREEK TEST SITE BASELINE MVA INITIATED

CO 2 Geological Storage: Research, Development and Deployment (RD&D) Issues

4.4 MODEL CODE DESCRIPTION 4.5 WATER SOURCES AND SINKS 4.6 MODEL DOMAIN AND BOUNDARIES. SLR South Africa

Deep Saline Formations: The Largest Potential Volumes for Geological Storage of CO 2

Global Climate & Energy Project

Sequestration Down Under

Carbon Dioxide Storage in Geological Media

Characterization of Deep Groundwater: A Conference Report. William M. Alley, Michael Wireman, Mary Musick 2014 GWPC Annual Forum

Synergetic CO2 Storage and gas/oil production from tight reservoirs

Evaluation of Groundwater Quality Changes in Response to CO 2 Leakage from Deep Geological Storage

IEA IEA--GHG Risk Assessment Network Meeting GHG Risk Assessment Melbourne - Melbourne April 16th- April 16th 17th

Supplemental Guide II-Delineations

Laboratory experiments on core-scale behavior of CO 2 exolved from CO 2 - saturated brine

RECENT ADVANCES IN CO 2 STORAGE SCIENCE

Feng Pan 1,2, Brian McPherson 1,2, Peter Lichtner 3, John Kaszuba 4, Caroline Lo Ré 4, Satish Karra 3, Chuan Lu 5, TianFu Xu 6

H.R.6. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate) Subtitle B--Geothermal Energy

Surface Water and Seawater Interactions in the Coastal Environment of Biscayne Bay, Southeast Florida

IEA-GHG Summer School Svalbard Aug 2010

international journal of greenhouse gas control xxx (2008) xxx xxx available at journal homepage:

Water supply issues in unconfined bedrock aquifers in the Ft. McMurray area

Siting and Monitoring CO 2 Storage Projects Sally M. Benson Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720

Sensitivity Study of the main petrophysical and geomechanical parameters for the CO2 storage capacity estimation in deep saline aquifers

GROUNDWATER MODELING OF A PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER TO ENHANCE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Multiphase Flow in the Subsurface - Flow of a Light Nonaqueous Phase Liquid (LNAPL)

POTENTIAL FOR CARBON CAPTURE AND SEQUESTRATION (CCS) IN FLORIDA

Reservoir Engineering

Variable density groundwater flow: are equivalent freshwater heads necessary or misleading?

Variable density groundwater flow: are equivalent freshwater heads necessary or misleading?

Effects of gravity on flow behaviour of supercritical CO2 during enhanced gas recovery and sequestration

REMOVAL OF WATER FOR CARBON DIOXIDE-BASED EGS OPERATION

CO 2 Geological Storage Principles, Applicability in Canada, and Challenges

CO2 Storage Experience in Japan including Impacts of Earthquakes. Ziqiu Xue Research Institute of Innovative Tech.

REINJECTION STRATEGY FOR GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS

Engr. Adnan Qamar Lecturer Energy Resources

CONCENTRATE AND BRINE MANAGEMENT THROUGH DEEP WELL INJECTION. Abstract

1. Apply knowledge of the controlling variables for groundwater flow. 2. Demonstrate groundwater flow direction based on hydraulic head observations.

Potential effects evaluation of dewatering an underground mine on surface water and groundwater located in a rural area

Groundwater. Groundwater Movement. Groundwater Movement Recharge: the infiltration of water into any subsurface formation.

Science Olympiad. Mentor Invitational Hydrogeology ANSWER KEY. Name(s): School Name: Point Totals

Flux-Based Evaluation of Perched-Water in the Deep Vadose Zone at the Hanford Site 14051

Centralia, Washington Deep Coal Seam CO 2 Sequestration Evaluation Final Report

General Groundwater Concepts

FINAL REPORT. Stratigraphic Forward Modelling Comparison with Eclipse for SW Hub

Optimization of Experimental Parameters for Comparing Enhanced Geothermal Working Fluids in the Lab

Coal Bed Methane (black coal, green future.)

Possible Exam Questions for Other Topics in Chemistry 10

Bill X. Hu. Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences Florida State University

CO 2 Sequestration Market Development

Available online at Energy Procedia 1 (2009) (2008) GHGT-9

Groundwater Investigations for CCR Landfills in Karst Terrain

Risk Assessment & Numerical Modeling

Geological l Sequestration: ti AP Primer

Groundwater Flow Systems

Ground Water Chapter 11

Fluid Flow in Porous Media

Coalbed Methane- Fundamental Concepts

Research Areas: Subsurface Flow & Transport (modified after Springer; YZ s expertise/interest marked by X )

FLOWING FLUID ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY PROFILING AN INVENTIVE AND COST EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL DOWNHOLE HYDRAULIC PROFILING TECHNIQUES

An experimental study of permeability determination in the lab

Transcription:

CO 2 Sequestration in Deep Aquifers Brian J. O. L. McPherson (brian@nmt.edu; 55-835-5259) Hydrology Program, Earth and Environmental Science New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, NM 8781 Peter C. Lichtner (lichtner@lanl.gov; 55-667-342) Los Alamos National Laboratory Earth & Environmental Sciences Division (EES-6) MS F-649 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Abstract Disposal and long-term sequestration of anthropogenic "greenhouse gases" such as CO 2 is a proposed approach to reducing global warming. Deep, regional-scale aquifers in sedimentary basins are possible sites for sequestration, given their ubiquitous nature. We used a mathematical sedimentary basin model, including multiphase flow of CO 2, groundwater, and brine, to evaluate residence times in possible aquifer storage sites and migration patterns and rates away from such sites in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming. We also used the model to simulate CO 2 flow through fractures, to evaluate partitioning between fracture and rock matrix. These simulations provide insight regarding the ultimate propensity of permeability reductions versus permeability increases in the fracture zone associated with carbonate reactions. Regional-scale hydrologic properties, including the presence of fracture zones, were calibrated using surface heat flow data. Our initial results suggest that, in general, long-term (~1 years or more) sequestration in deep aquifers is possible, if subsurface structure and permeability are well characterized. However, additional risks are involved. In addition to CO 2 escape from sequestration aquifers into other aquifers or to the land surface, another environmental threat posed by subsurface sequestration is contamination by brines. We evaluated the potential for such unintended aquifer contamination by displacement of brines out of adjacent sealing layers such as marine shales. Results suggest that sustained injection of CO 2 may incur wide-scale brine displacement out of adjacent sealing layers, depending on the injection history, initial brine composition, and hydrologic properties of both aquifers and seals. Introduction Anthropogenic greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, are considered a major contributor to global warming. Sequestration of power plant generated CO 2 by injection into groundwater aquifers and (petroleum and gas) reservoirs has been proposed as a possible alternative for the reduction of excessive greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Ideally, injected CO 2 will migrate through an aquifer from injection wells to remote storage sites, and remain isolated from the atmosphere for a considerable period of time.

CO 2 has been used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) purposes since the 195s. For example, the first carbonated water floods were tested as early as 1951, and slugs of pure CO 2 for oil displacement were tested as early as 1963. Research on use of CO 2 for EOR continues in earnest today. However, research concerning terrestrial sequestration of CO 2 for environmental purposes is relatively recent. Fundamental topics of interest in sequestration research have concerned not just scientific and technical aspects, but practical concerns such as the economic feasibility of storage, safety, and the maximum possible amount of CO 2 storage globally and for specified regions. An economically sound approach to CO 2 sequestration is to identify storage sites close to CO 2 sources such as fossil-fuel power plants. Subsurface groundwater aquifers are suggested, and we further refine this idea to groundwater aquifer systems and petroleum reservoir aquifers such as those found in sedimentary basins. These aquifer systems are large in size, possibly permitting storage of large quantities of CO 2. More importantly, however, these aquifers exist throughout large portions of the continents, improving the chance that CO 2 sources are near storage sites and minimize engineering and transport costs. Approach Our hypothesis is that sedimentary basin aquifers and petroleum reservoir systems are good candidates for sequestering CO 2, and further contend that the capability of an aquifer to transmit and store CO 2 is controlled by the fundamental geology: depositional environment, structure, stratigraphy, and pressure/temperature conditions. To test this hypothesis, we examined specific aquifers in a typical intracontinental sedimentary basin, using conceptual and numerical modeling. Fundamental research questions include: 1. Can typical regional scale aquifers provide the residence time needed to achieve stated global temperature reduction goals2. What geologic conditions, e.g., rock properties, depositional environments, structure, etc., provide optimal CO 2 flow and transport, and optimal storage in a sedimentary basin? We approached these questions in a preliminary numerical analysis of a sedimentary basin, the Powder River Basin of Wyoming. The numerical model includes multiphase flow of CO 2, groundwater, and brine, allowing evaluation of residence times in possible aquifer storage sites, and migration patterns and rates away from such sites in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming. We also used the model to simulate CO 2 flow through fractures, to evaluate partitioning of CO 2 between the fracture network and rock matrix. These simulations provide insight regarding the ultimate propensity of permeability reduction versus permeability enhancement in the fracture zone associated with carbonate reactions.

Project Description: Mathematical Model A two-dimensional finite volume model of the Powder River Basin cross-section SW-NE (Figure 1) is used for the simulations analyses. The model domain is 23 km horizontal by 5 km vertical, consisting of 5 grid-blocks (1 horizontal by 5 vertical), each 23 m by 1 m. Eight model units are delineated in the cross-section of Figure 1(a). The computer codetough2 (Pruess, 1991), which includes coupled flow of heat, groundwater, and brine, was used to carry out the simulations. TOUGH2 was adapted to include an extended equation-ofstate for CO 2 (McPherson and Cole, 2). The approach of Weir, White, and Kissling (1996) was used. These authors developed an extended Redlich- Kwong equation based on the work of Kerrick and (b) (a) Elevation (m) Heat Flow (mw m -2 ) 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 2-2 -4 Salt Creek Anticline Vertical Exaggeration x 16 Figure 1. (a) Powder River Basin structural cross-section SW-NE; (b) observed heat flow in the basin. Jacobs (1981) to describe the transport and thermodynamic properties of CO 2 mixtures as a function of pressure, temperature, and CO 2 concentration. Using this extended Redlich-Kwong equation in the TOUGH2 model provides appropriate thermodynamic and transport properties of supercritical CO 2 for the range of pressures and temperatures observed in a typical sedimentary basin. Results and Application Calibration of Regional Scale Permeability The first step for investigating the suitability of the Power River Basis for sequestering CO 2, is to calibrate the model to present-day conditions. The thermal regime of the Powder River Basin was evaluated by McPherson and Chapman (1996), who analyzed temperature and geologic data from over 3 oil and gas wells within a 18 km by 3 km transect. The cross-section of Figure 1(a) is the center of that transect. The cause of anomalously high heat flow (>2 mw m -2 )

observed over the Salt Creek anticline on the southwestern side of the transect (Figure 1b) was not definitively resolved. The anomalous thermal regime observed in the southern half of the basin cannot be explained by variation in conductivity alone. It is likely caused by advection of heat in a basin-scale groundwater flow system, including groundwater driven by the topography of the Black Hills in South Dakota, sweeping heat from deeper portions of the basin and discharging in the area of the Salt Creek Anticline. We analyzed this possible flow system using our extended model of coupled groundwater-co 2 -heat flow that accounts for thermal advection, conduction, and heat generation. By matching modeled surface heat flow to the observed distribution, the model provided estimates of effective basin-scale permeabilities of Powder River Basin aquifers, including candidate aquifers for CO 2 sequestration. The best match to the surface heat flow distribution (Figure 1b) was obtained by assuming a simple but heterogeneous permeability structure: aquifers were assigned effective basin-scale aquifer permeability ranges of K PB = 5. x 1-14 m 2 to 2. x 1-13 m 2 and K NB = 1. x 1-17 m 2 to 1. x 1-16 m 2 (where K PB = permeability parallel to the bedding plane and K NB = permeability normal to the bedding plane), and shaley units were assigned regional permeability values of < 1-17 m 2. These permeability distributions were used in our simulations of CO 2 transport and storage. Probably the most interesting result of the permeability calibration analysis was the necessity to simulate fractures in the apex of the Salt Creek Anticline with higher, isotropic (K PB = K NB ) permeability in order to match model surface heat flow to observed heat flow at the anticline (Figure 1b). Thus, for the regional groundwater flow system to be the primary cause of the anomalously high heat flow observed over the anticline, the anticline must be fractured enough to provide a high permeability conduit. CO 2 Residence Time and Migration Rates In our numerical model simulations of the Powder River Basin, we injected supercritical CO 2 into the Fox Hills Sandstone, an Upper Cretaceous formation, at ~18 meters depth (location shown on Figure 2). The unit above the Fox Hills is the Lance Formation, a Paleocene sandy shale unit. Groundwater flow in this area of the Fox Hills formation is relatively slow, inasmuch as the hydraulic head gradient is weak. Migration of supercritical CO 2 is towards the area of lowest surface elevation adjacent to the Black Hills (left to right on Figure 2). Because the density of supercritical CO 2 is lower than that of normal groundwater, buoyancy as well as hydrodynamic gradients drive the flow of CO 2. Dissolved CO 2 in the aqueous solution tracks the movement of supercritical CO 2. Lower relative and saturated permeability mitigate the vertical movement of CO 2 through the Lance Formation above the Fox Hills. Figure 3 illustrates lateral migration rates of supercritical CO 2 as a function of matrix permeability. Higher permeability induces higher migration rates, on the order of 1 meters per year. At permeability less than 1-15 m 2 (~1 md), migration rates become negligible, suggesting that intact, low permeability shales should be effective sealing layers. Overpressures associated with high injection rates can induce local migration rates approaching 1 km per year, at higher permeability values (e.g., ~1-12 m 2 ). A sensitivity analysis suggested that the other primary factors affecting migration rate include relative permeability and capillarity, both of which are

poorly characterized in the literature. Recall that fracture permeability in the Salt Creek area was necessary to mimic observed heat flow patterns. Often such fracture zones in the subsurface are not discovered until drilling, begging the question about effective CO 2 migration Shale ( within Ft. Union) Sandstone ( within Lance) Elevation (km) Figure 2. Example of injection and migration of supercritical CO 2 in the Powder River Basin. rates through fractures, and possible partitioning of CO 2 between fracture and matrix. We investigated this issue using the dual permeability approach incorporated in the TOUGH2 code (Pruess, 1991). -2 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Saturation (%) of separate phase CO 2-4 Distance (km) 2 Migration Distance (km) in 1 yrs 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 21 m/yr 123 m/yr 1 2 m/yr 25 cm/yr -16-15 -14-13 -12 Log Absolute Permeability (m 2 ) Figure 3. Migration rate of supercritical CO 2 as a function of permeability. To simulate a fracture through a sealing layer, we assigned a vertical column of dual permeability cells within the sealing layer of the basin model, local to the injection area. Thus, high fluid pressures associated with injection (approaching 3 MPa, whereas ambient hydrostatic pressure is ~17 MPa) are the principal driving force of CO 2 through the vertical fracture. In this generic fracture model, the fracture volume is assigned to be 2% of the cell, fracture porosity is 1%, and permeability is 1-15 m 2 (~1 md). The surrounding medium was assigned an order of magnitude lower permeability (1-16 m 2 ). Results of this

simulation indicate that, in the absence of chemical reactions, most CO 2 will move through the fracture network per se (Figure 4). A migration rate of ~3 m/year throu gh the fracture resulted for both dissolved and supercritical phases of CO 2. Plotting the ratio of mass of dissolved phase CO 2 to total mass CO 2 illustrates that the leading edge of the migrating CO 2 is primarily dissolved phase CO 2. No supercritical phase migrates into the rock matrix bordering the fracture walls, and the only significant penetration of dissolved phase CO 2 occurs very close to the lower fracture opening, where fluid pressure gradients are highest. Unintended Impact: Brine Displacement Some risks are associated with geological sequestration of CO 2. In addition to escape of CO 2 from sequestration aquifers into other aquifers or to the land surface, another environmental threat posed by subsurface sequestration is contamination of sweet water aquifers by brines. We evaluated the potential for such unintended aquifer contamination by displacement of brines out of adjacent sealing layers such as marine shales. In the model simulation, we assigned a salinity of 3 g/l, or ~25% by weight brine saturation, (which is high compared to typical values of 1% or less), in the Lance shale unit above the Fox Hills sandstone (the CO 2 sequestration aquifer). We examined how migration of CO 2 into the Lance unit (not fractured in this simulation) from below displaced brine out of the Lance unit at its top. Figure 5 illustrates that after 4 years of injection Distance Along Vertical Fracture (m) 4 3 2 1 Dissolved Phase CO 2 Saturation in Fracture Dissolved Phase CO 2 Saturation in Matrix Mass Dissolved CO 2 / Total Mass CO 2 in Fracture Supercritical CO 2 Saturation in Fracture 25 5 75 1 into the Fox Hills, high fluid pressures cause significant displacemen t of brine out of the top of the Lance unit. The movement of the brine front is summarized in Figure 6, illustrating that permeability of the sealing layer is the primary factor of concern, in addition to injection rates and associated high fluid pressures. A sensitivity analysis indicated that capillarity had a nominal effect on brine displacement. % Figure 4. Distribution of CO 2 within fracture simulated using a dual permeability approach.

In sum, results suggest that sustained injection of CO 2 may incur wide-scale brine displacement out of adjacent sealing layers, depending on the injection history, initial brine composition, and hydrologic properties of both aquifers and seals. While the results presented here are unique to the simplified model of the Powder River Basin used in this analysis, they may provide general implications for other basins of interest for CO 2 sequestration. Elevation (m) Elevation (m) 2 1-1 2 1-1 4 Years 1 Years 9 1 11 12 Horizontal Distance (km) 1 km Figure 5. Simulation results illustrating displacement of brine out of a shale sealing layer as a consequence of CO 2 injection in aquifer below. Color contours are brine saturation in the sealing layer and aquifer above; grayscale contours are equivalent hydraulic head in the aquifer below. Arrows are flow vectors illustrating flow away from the injection well..1.9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1 36 32 28 24 2 16 12 8 4 Future Activities Current and future activities include laboratory experiments to characterize relevant chemical reactions associated with geological sequestration of CO 2. We are examining a limited number of reactions among saturated brines, supercritical CO 2 solutions, and the rock matrix at elevated pressures and temperatures. Simultaneously, we are analyzing brines and reaction products for a broad suite of minor and trace elements to survey for possible changes. We are particularly interested in these experiments in the stability of hydrated silicates and aluminosilicates that comprise reactive components of reservoir injection zones. These flow-through experiments will be used to characterize pore structure changes and general behavior of brine and CO 2 during alteration. Precipitation rates for magnesite will also be investigated. Results of these experiments will be used to parameterize reactive transport model aspects using the computer code FLOTRAN (Lichtner, 2), which we are coupling to our extended

Migration Rate (m/yr) 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5-18 -17-16 -15-14 -13 Log Absolute Permeability (m 2 ) Figure 6. Rate of brine front movement as a function of matrix permeability. TOUGH2 CO 2 flow and transport simulation model. Similar model simulations as described here, but with reactive transport aspects, will be conducted to evaluate possible effects on in situ permeability evolution associated with geological sequestration of CO 2, including mineral trapping References Kerrick, D. M., and G. K. Jacobs, A modified Redlich Kwong equation for H 2 O, CO 2, and H 2 O- CO 2 mixtures, Amer. J. Sci., v. 281, p. 735 767, 1981. Lichtner, P.C., FLOTRAN: User's Manual, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, 2. McPherson, B.J.O.L. and Chapman, D.S., 1996, Thermal Analysis of the Southern Powder River Basin, Wyoming, Geophysics, v. 61, p. 1689-171, 1996. McPherson, B. J. O. L., and Cole, B. S., Multiphase CO 2 Flow, Transport and Sequestration in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming, U.S.A., Journal of Geochemical Exploration, v. 69-7, p. 65-69, 2. Pruess, K., TOUGH2-A general-purpose numerical simulator for multiphase fluid and heat flow, Rep. LBL - 294, Lawrence Berkeley Lab., September 1991. Weir, G. J., S. P. White, and W. M. Kissling, Reservoir storage and containment of greenhouse gases, Transport in Porous Media, v. 23, p. 37 6, 1996.