Supercritical Water Coal Conversion with Aquifer-Based Sequestration of CO 2

Similar documents
Biomass Combustion Technology

Coal Energy Conversion with Aquifer-Based Carbon Sequestration: An Approach to Electric Power Generation with Zero Matter Release to the Atmosphere

Technologies for CO 2 Capture From Electric Power Plants

The Role of Engineering Simulation in Clean Coal Technologies

Chapter 13. Thermal Conversion Technologies. Fundamentals of Thermal Processing

Scott Hume. Electric Power Research Institute, 1300 West WT Harris Blvd, Charlotte NC 28262

Fischer Tropsch Catalyst Test on Coal-Derived Synthesis Gas

CALCIUM LOOPING PROCESS FOR CLEAN FOSSIL FUEL CONVERSION. Shwetha Ramkumar, Robert M. Statnick, Liang-Shih Fan. Daniel P. Connell

Performance Evaluation of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle Coal Gasification Plant

Process simulation activities at Politecnico di Milano on Ca-based solid looping cycles

Author: Andrea Milioni Chemical Engineer On Contract Cooperator University UCBM Rome (Italy)

Module 4 : Hydrogen gas. Lecture 29 : Hydrogen gas

Cryogenic Carbon Capture

Potential of Allam cycle with natural gas to reduce carbon dioxide emission in India

CEMENT PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY FOR ACHIEVING HIGH SO 2 REMOVAL

The Novel Design of an IGCC System with Zero Carbon Emissions

3D Modelling of Oxygen Fired CFB Combustors in Different Scales

Efficient volume reduction and concentration of mining waste water with direct contact evaporation technology

Supercritical Fluids

High-efficiency low LCOE combined cycles for sour gas oxy-combustion with CO[subscript 2] capture

Mobile Propulsion and Fixed Power Production with Near-Zero Atmospheric Emissions

DISCLAIMER. Portions of this document may be illegible electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

EVALUATION OF AN INTEGRATED BIOMASS GASIFICATION/FUEL CELL POWER PLANT

PRECOMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY for Coal Fired Power Plant

The Development of Clean Coal Technology in the US

Nuclear Hydrogen for Production of Liquid Hydrocarbon Transport Fuels

Analysis of Exergy and Energy of Gasifier Systems for Coal-to-Fuel

What resources do we have?

Lecture 4. Ammonia: Production and Storage - Part 1

Development of an integrated procedure for comprehensive gasification modelling

Design Optimisation of the Graz Cycle Prototype Plant

BLUE OPTION White space is filled with one or more photos

The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant

APPLICATION OF BGL GASIFICATION OF SOLID HYDROCARBONS FOR IGCC POWER GENERATION

environmental impacts. These impurity levels may be very heterogeneous and in

Design principles for IGCC with CO 2 Capture

A Novel LNG and Oxygen Stoichiometric Combustion Cycle without CO 2 Emission

SYNGAS-FIRED ALLAM CYCLE PROJECT UPDATE

Methanol Production by Gasification of Heavy Residues

Fossil Energy. Fossil Energy Technologies. Chapter 12, #1. Access (clean HH fuel) Coal. Air quality (outdoor)

The comparison study on the operating condition of gasification power plant with various feedstocks

Production of Electricity and/or Fuels from Biomass by Thermochemical Conversion

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

Investigators: R. E. Mitchell, Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department; P. A. Campbell and L. Ma, Graduate Researchers

Fate of elemental contaminants during biomass thermochemical process

9/12/2018. Course Objectives MSE 353 PYROMETALLURGY. Prerequisite. Course Outcomes. Forms of Assessment. Course Outline

Clean Coal Utilization Based on Underground Coal Gasification Integrated Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and Carbon dioxide Sequestration

PRESSURIZED DOWNDRAFT COMBUSTION OF WOODCHIPS

USE AND ELIMINATION OF METHANE IN COALMINE VENTILATION AIR (Cummings,D,R) DUT Pty Ltd

Problems in chapter 9 CB Thermodynamics

Sustainable Energy. Lecture 7: Fossil Fuels and Fossil Energy

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics Design Project. Production of Allyl Chloride

Sorbents Evaluation Testing Facilities. 95% removal efficiency or an emission standard of lbs/gw h by 2012, while

ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY RECOVERY FROM CARBONATION PROCESS USING MASS AND ENERGY BALANCE

Research Article Effect of Heating Method on Hydrogen Production by Biomass Gasification in Supercritical Water

MODELLING THE LOW-TAR BIG GASIFICATION CONCEPT

MODELING OF BIOMASS GASIFICATION Venko Petkov, Emil Mihailov, Nadezhda Kazakova

Integrated Membrane Reactor for Pre-Combustion CO 2 Capture

Focus on Gasification in the Western U.S.

Questions. Downdraft biomass gasifier. Air. Air. Blower. Air. Syngas line Filter VFD. Gas analyzer(s) (vent)

Advanced AQCS for Oxy-fuel Combustion System; Controlling Mercury & SO3

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Cagliari Piazza d Armi, Cagliari, Italia

Thermal power plant. ME922/927 Thermal power plant 1

Faculty of Engineering 2 nd year 2016 Mechanical Engineering Dep. Final-exam (code: M 1222)

Nitrogen oxide chemistry in combustion processes. Based on material originally by Prof. Mikko Hupa

Research and Development Initiatives of WRI

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, and Thermodynamics Fall Design Project. Production of Dimethyl Ether

ADVANCES in NATURAL and APPLIED SCIENCES

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 180B CARBON CAPTURE FROM COAL FIRED POWER GENERATION (DECEMBER 2008 REPUBLISHED MARCH 2009)

Dry Low-NOx Combustion Technology for Novel Clean Coal Power Generation Aiming at the Realization of a Low Carbon Society

Process Optimization of Hydrogen Production from Coal Gasification

Keywords: Reformer model; Preferential oxidation; Water-gas shift reaction

Improved solutions for solid waste to energy conversion

MSW Processing- Gasifier Section

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

1. Process Description:

Repowering Conventional Coal Plants with Texaco Gasification: The Environmental and Economic Solution

Decentralized Biomass Power Production

Table of Contents. Preface...

A Further Step Towards a Graz Cycle Power Plant for CO 2 Capture

CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES, CHALLENGES AND FUTURE SCOPE

Nuclear-Power Ammonia Production

A novel CO 2 -capturing natural gas combined cycle with LNG cold energy utilization

Clean Coal Technology Roadmap CURC/EPRI/DOE Consensus Roadmap

Engr. Adnan Qamar Lecturer Energy Resources

Biomass gasification gas cleaning by reforming Energy Lab 2.0 meets Neo-Carbon Energy Noora Kaisalo

WRI S PRE GASIFICATION TREATMENT OF PRB COALS FOR IMPROVED ADVANCED CLEAN COAL GASIFIER DESIGN

Cryogenic Carbon Capture University of Wyoming Bench Scale Project Final Executive Summary Report -Sponsor- Wyoming Department of Environmental

Slim POX Design for Gasification 4th International Freiberg Conference on IGCC & XtL Technologies 3-5. May 2010

The Enerjetik RJ2 Gasifier. Do we finally have the right gasifying system for the Ceramic Industry?

A new technology for high efficient Waste-to-Energy plants

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

THE ASSESSMENT OF A WATER-CYCLE FOR CAPTURE OF CO2

CHAPTER 1 BASIC CONCEPTS

Simulation of methanol synthesis from syngas obtained through biomass gasification using Aspen Plus

Pilot Scale Production of Mixed Alcohols from Wood. Supplementary Information

Drying of High-Moisture Coals For Power Production & Gasification

Carpet Waste Gasification:

Electricity Generation

Creating the Future of Coal-Fired Power Generation

Transcription:

Supercritical Water Coal Conversion with Aquifer-Based Sequestration of CO 2 Profs. Reginald Mitchell, 1 Christopher Edwards 1 and Scott Fendorf 2 1 Mechanical Engineering Department 2 Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences Stanford University Stanford, CA GCEP Research Symposium 2008 October 1-3, 2008 1

Projected World Electricity Generation by Fuel Type and World Carbon Dioxide Emissions: 2005-2030 Electricity Generation by Fuel Type Carbon Emissions From Energy Information Adinistration (EIA), International Energy Annual 2005 (June-October 2007)

Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector Emissions from fuel burning (coal, oil, natural gas, and wood) have altered the natural carbon cycle by increasing the concentration of CO 2 in the atmosphere. There is almost 37% more CO 2 in the atmosphere today (~383 ppm CO 2 ) than there was at the end of the 18th century. Environmentally benign use of coal as an energy resource requires CO 2 capture and sequestration.

Research Overview Fundamental studies are being undertaken to gain the understanding and information needed to design and develop a supercritical water coal-to-electricity conversion scheme with carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in an aquifer. 4

Deep Saline Aquifers CO2 capacity estimates in U.S. saline formations range from 1000 to 3700 billion tons of CO2, sufficient for 86 to 318 years of CO2 storage at the rate that coal was used for electric power generation worldwide in 2004. Taken from: Carbon Sequestration Atlas of the United States and Canada, NETL Dissolved solids must be removed before the aquifer water is suitable for dissolving the coal conversion products.

Why Coal Conversion in Supercritical Water? Nonpolar organic compounds and oxygen are miscible in all proportions in water above its critical point (647.3 K, 218 atm) and many salts are insoluble. Consequently, Small polar and nonpolar organic compounds released during coal extraction and devolatilization are completely miscible in SCW. Large organic compounds released during coal devolatilization hydrolyze in SCW yielding H 2, CO, CO 2, and low molecular weight hydrocarbons, without tar, soot or PAH formation. Sulfur, nitrogen and many trace elements in coals are oxidized to form insoluble salts in SCW. Coal gasification products will be dissolved in supercritical water, and any salts can be precipitated from the fluid mixture and removed from the system with the coal ash. There are no gaseous emissions. 6

System Schematic of Integrated Coal Conversion and Aquifer Sequestration additives Aquifer brine Brine pretreat Brine preheater SC Brine Salt separator Brine Salt mixer Injectant Water coal Coal slurry plant coal/water slurry Gasifier/ Reformer Ash Oxidizer syngas ASU Combustor Compressor Heat Exchanger Helium Turbine Work Processing occurs at a constant pressure near the critical point. air Pump Heat Exchanger H2O Turbine Work Condenser 7

Overall Project Objective and Tasks The overall project objective is to provide the information needed to develop the proposed coal-to-electricity scheme with in situ CO 2 sequestration. Task I. Supercritical Water Coal Reforming Research efforts are aimed at characterizing coal conversion rates under SCW conditions and determining the conditions that maximize the amount of chemical energy from the coal in the synthesis fluid. Task II. Supercritical Water Combustion of Synthesis Fluid Research efforts center around the design and operation of the oxidation reactor and the heat exchanger needed to transfer energy to the heat engine. Systems analysis is also part of this task. Task III. Aquifer Interactions Research activities are concerned with characterizing the impact of dissolved constituents in the exhaust water being returned to the aquifer on aquifer ecology. 8

Task I. Supercritical Coal Reforming Experimental activities will be undertaken to characterize the rates of extraction, devolatilization, gasification, and oxidation of coals in SCW. Models for coal conversion in SCW environments will be developed that take into account real gas thermodynamic and transport properties. O2 at 290 atm Water at 290 atm Pump Coal/water Slurry Back-Pressure Regulator High Pressure Tank Booster Oxygen High Pressure Tank Pump Water Air Water Heater Fluidized Sand Bath Ice Bath Schematic of experimental SCW coal reforming facility Analyzers Exhaust

Autothermal Gasifier Operation Sufficient oxygen is added to the gasifier to maintain a temperature of 647 K. To maintain SCW conditions, the partial pressure of water vapor in the gasiifier syngas mixture must be equal to (or exceed) its critical pressure of 218 atm. Coal composition, by wt. : 79.7% C, 4.2% H, 3,0% O, 1.5%N, 1.5%S Required oxygen for autothermal operation as a function of slurry solids loading (fraction of solids in water) when no reactant preheating. Water partial pressure, P H2O, in syngas mixture as a function of total pressure and slurry solids loading when no preheating.

Gasifier Synthesis Gas: Real Gas Effects The Peng-Robinson equation of state is used to describe the variations in pressure with specific volume and temperature. T = 647 K real gas ideal gas data Fugacity is used as a measure of the nonideality of a real gas. H 2 O Fugacity Coefficients, f/p T = 647 K, P = 290 atm H 2 S 0.8601 H 2 O 0.5169 O 2 1.0695 HCl 0.9397 CH 4 1.0562 SO 2 0.7856 N 2 1.1128 C 2 H 6 0.9534 Cl 2 0.7507 CO 1.1129 NH 3 0.8704 COS 0.8187 H 2 1.0734 C 2 H 4 0.9845 NO 1.1014 CO 2 0.9949 C 2 H 2 0.9824 NO 2 0.9358 Coal composition, by wt. 79.7% C, 4.2% H, 3,0% O, 1.5%N, 1.5%S, 0.01% Cl Gasification conditions: T = 647 K, P = 290 atm Slurry solids fraction: 0.2

Task II. Supercritical Water Combustion of Synthesis Fluid The stream entering the heat exchanger of the heat engine needs to operate as close as possible to material thermal limits to maximize heat engine efficiency. Thus, a primary goals of the combustor design effort is the distancing of oxidation zones from reactor walls and the control of flow streams to avoid liner corrosion. Under consideration is the design of a combined reactorheat exchanger in which hydrodynamics and water injection are used to control reaction, mixing and wall interactions. 12

Schematic of Experimental SCW Oxidation Facility

Systems Analysis 500 MW Power Plant * SCWO system consists of the coal reformer and combustor units Component Brayton Cycle Power (MW) Compressor -388.4 Turbine 659.9 Net 271.5 Rankine Cycle Condensate Pump -0.026 Feed Pump -2.27 Turbine 331.6 Net 329.3 ASU -73.2 Water Pumps -27.5 Overall Plant 500.0 Fuel Heat Rate (LHV*m fuel ) 1188.4 Overall Efficiency 42.1% * SCWO system outlet temperature = 1600 K Brayton cycle compressor inlet pressure = 79.5 atm

Task III. Aquifer Interactions Activities to characterizing the impact of dissolved constituents in the water being returned to the aquifer on aquifer ecology will be undertaken. Of concern are: The fates of such contaminants in coals as arsenic, mercury and lead, which are subject to migration should physical isolation be disturbed. Oxygenation of the aquifer, potentially destabilizing the sulfidic minerals. The potential to develop dramatic fluctuations in ph resulting from variations in CO 2 content, possibly destabilizing aquifer solids and inducing dissolution or colloidal transport. 15

Fates of Coal Trace Elements in Aquifer Environments Simulations have been conducted to assess the dissolved concentrations and fates of coal trace elements in brine fluids. Elements of interest include As, Cr, Cu, Hg, Pb, Zn, and Cd. In the simulations, trace elements in coal were reacted incrementally with 1-L brine water under oxic and anoxic conditions. The calculations use both the electrolyte theory of Pitzer and the extended Debye-Hückel formulation to estimate activity coefficients. The chemical equilibrium program EQ3/6 (and its associated thermodynamic database) was employed to perform the calculations.

Brine Effluent Equilibration Molality Molality Molality Molality Cr Zn As Cu Hg

Constituent Sorption to Precipitated Goethite Goethite (FeOOH) is the most common constituent of many forms of natural rust. It is a phase expected to form in the brine fluid and regulate dissolved metal(loid) concentrations. Molality Molality As As noted in the simulations, arsenic (As) is the primary component retained on the FeOOH solid.

Conclusions This investigation aims to lay the foundation for an efficient coal energy option with no matter release to the atmosphere. The CO 2 and other combustion products are pre-equilibrated in the water being injected into a deep saline aquifer, allaying any concerns about selective CO 2 release. Advantages of the proposed aquifer-based supercritical water coal conversion scheme for electric power generation relative to current and other proposed power generation systems include: maximally efficient power production while storing CO 2 products in indefinitely stable forms (mitigating public and technical concerns with potential gas releases from gas-only aquifer injection schemes), near-zero traditional air pollutant emissions, and size reduction of reactor vessel (compared to conventional pulverized coal-fired systems).

Posters Integration of Coal Energy Conversion with Aquifer-Based Carbon Sequestration Coal Energy Conversion via Combustion in Supercritical Aquifer Water: An Approach to Electric Power Generation without Atmospheric Emissions 20