Camp Ravenna Restoration Advisory Board Meeting Military Munitions Response Program

Similar documents
Fort George G. Meade. Military Munitions Response Program Mortar Range Munitions Response Area. Public Meeting July 19, 2012

Shaw Project Status Update Ravenna AAP, Ohio by Dave Cobb, Shaw PM

Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach Remedial Investigation at MRP Sites UXO1, UXO6, and AOC2. Restoration Advisory Board Meeting January 10, 2018

Shaw MMRP Project Update Ravenna AAP, Ohio

Fort Indiantown Gap, Pennsylvania Military M unitions Munitions Response Response Program Program coc et A rea Remedi l a I nvesti tiga tig tion

Closed Castner Firing Range Remedial Investigation. Technical Project Planning (TPP) Meeting #4 07 November :00 AM 11:00 AM

Closed Castner Firing Range Remedial Investigation

Technical Project Planning Meeting 1

Los Angeles District

Text in bold italics indicates that a word/phrase is included in the glossary at the end of this Proposed Plan.

Advanced Classification at Joint Base Cape Cod (JBCC) UXO removal in the Central Impact Area

FINAL PROPOSED PLAN FOR FORMER MORTAR RANGE MRA FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND July 2012

Draft Final Proposed Plan Buckroe Beach Formerly Used Defense Site Hampton, Virginia

FINAL DRAFT. United States Army Military Munitions Response Program. Munitions Response Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study Guidance

Closed Castner Firing Range Remedial Investigation

Former Nansemond Ordnance Depot (FNOD)

Text in bold italics indicates that a word/phrase is included in the glossary at the end of this Proposed Plan.

November 2014 FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL FORMER CAPE POGE LITTLE NECK BOMB TARGET MUNITIONS RESPONSE AREA MARTHA S VINEYARD, MASSACHUSETTS

Environmental Award Fiscal Year 2011

PROPOSED PLAN FOR MUNITIONS RESPONSE ACTIONS Former Camp Fannin Munitions Response Area, Tyler, Texas July 2013

PTA RAB /Rockaway Township Member and Township Representative

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Proposes Remediation and Requests Public Comments South Beach Munitions Response Area Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS)

IMPACT AREA GROUNDWATER STUDY PROGRAM AT THE MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY RESERVATION Overview and Update Fact Sheet No

FINAL. United States Army Military Munitions Response Program. Munitions Response Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study Guidance

Proposed Plans for Soil, Sediment, and Surface Water at. Anchor Test Area and Building 1200

FY2016 BLOSSOM POINT RESEARCH FACILITY

Table 1 EHE Module: Munitions Type Data Element Table

PROPOSED PLAN FOR SECTOR 16B MUNITIONS RESPONSE SITE

Final Feasibility Study for RVAAP-032-R-01 40mm Firing Range Munitions Response Site Version 1.0

Installation Restoration Program Framework: Introduction to CERCLA

PROPOSED PLAN FOR MUNITIONS RESPONSE ACTIONS FINAL

Proposed Plan. Former Moving Target Range (Site UXO 0002) Marine Corps Base Hawaii, Oahu, Hawaii. October 2015 MARINE CORPS ANNOUNCES PROPOSED PLAN

DRAFT FINAL PROPOSED PLAN May 2016 Former Port Angeles Combat Range, Washington Port Angeles Range Complex No. 1 MRS FUDS Property No.

DRAFT FINAL PROPOSED PLAN March 2016 Former Port Angeles Combat Range, Washington Port Angeles Range Complex No. 1 MRS FUDS Property No.

Public Comment Period 15 June to 17 July Project Information Repository

PROPOSED PLAN FOR AREA R MUNITIONS RESPONSE SITE

Proposed Plan Area N (Project 08) of the former Waikoloa Maneuver Area

Proposed Plan. Former Trap and Skeet Range (Site UXO 0003) Marine Corps Base Hawaii, Oahu, Hawaii. October 2015 MARINE CORPS ANNOUNCES PROPOSED PLAN

USACE Updates. Site-Wide Remedial Investigation (RI) Report Overview BUILDING STRONG

ACTION MEMORANDUM INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM SITE 1 VADOSE ZONE SOILS

Range 17 - Trap and Skeet Range Soil Remediation

USE OF ADVANCED GEOPHYSICAL CLASSIFICATION IN THE REMEDIAL PROCESS

Environmental Remediation Services Draft Focused FS FGGM 83/OU-1 Former Skeet Range

NO FURTHER ACTION PROPOSED PLAN

Final Feasibility Study for RVAAP-002-R-01 Erie Burning Grounds MRS Version 1.0

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune Restoration Advisory Board Meeting Minutes

Former Raritan Arsenal Fact Sheet

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (MCB CamLej) Restoration Advisory Board Meeting Minutes

November 30, Prepared for: Department of the Navy Base Realignment and Closure Program Management Office West San Diego, California 92108

UXO Considerations for Ranges

Final Work Plan for the Sand Creek Survey

Draft Record of Decision for RVAAP-03 Open Demolition Area #1. Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant Ravenna, Ohio

Draft Final. No Further Action Proposed Plan Duluth Air National Guard Base Duluth, Minnesota

Public Meeting Purpose

Proposed Plan Air Force Proposes No Further Action for Small Arms Firing Range (Site SR105) PUBLIC COMMENTS INVITED

FOREST PARK RECREATION CAMP CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI

UNDERSTANDING THE FUDS OE PAE/SI

US Army Corps of Engineers. Parks Township Shallow Land Disposal Area (SLDA) Site. PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION 8 May 2002

DEMONSTRATION REPORT

Fort George G. Meade. Restoration Advisory Board Meeting March 25, 2010

FINAL DECISION DOCUMENT FOR THE IMPACT AREA, PARCEL 136Q-X FORT McCLELLAN, CALHOUN COUNTY, ALABAMA ISSUED BY : U. S.

Demystifying RAOs, DQOs, CSMs. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Appendix F.7 Hazardous Materials and Waste

Proposed Plan and Non-Time Critical Removal Action for Operable Unit B-2 Cleanup of Munitions and Explosives of Concern

4825 Glenbrook Road N.W.

The Military Munitions Response Program: A Case Study of Munitions Response Site MU732

The Cleanup Process. Operation and Maintenance Construction Completion Post Construction Completion NPL Deletion Reuse

Initiation of Emerging Contaminants Characterization and Response Actions for Protection of Human Health

Hexavalent Chromium Contamination at U.S. Army Ammunition Facilities

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (N4) COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS (L)

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

FINAL MMRP REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN ADDENDUM #2

APPENDIX H HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROCEDURES AND RESULTS

Investigation of Former Off-Base Surface Danger Zones (SDZs)

Former Camp Elliott, East Elliott Munitions Response Site (MRS) 01, San Diego County, California

Spring Valley Formerly Used Defense Site Nebraska Avenue Parking Lot

FY2016 RAVENNA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

Implementation of Technical Project Planning (TPP) For Ordnance and Explosives (OE) Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Projects

INTRODUCTION. 1 Proposed Plan for the Former Lee Field Naval Air Station Landfill Area 2 Site

Appendix G. Field Change Requests

Munitions with Sensitive Fuzes Field Study Update

Fort George G. Meade. Proposed Plan Architect of the Capitol Site. Public Meeting August 7, 2014

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ER U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-EC Washington, DC Regulation No December 2016

3.12 PUBLIC SAFETY AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS CAMP RAVENNA

Lake Ontario Ordnance Works

Final. Record of Decision for Soil and Dry Sediment at the RVAAP-49 Central Burn Pits. Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant Ravenna, Ohio.

FINAL Technical Information Paper

CONCEPTUAL SITE MODELS

Environmental Restoration Program Community Involvement Plan U.S. Army Fort Detrick Frederick, Maryland

Subpart X General Technical Issues. (Part II) TechLaw February 2002 Day 2 General Technical Issues Part II 1

Environmental Restoration in Harbor and Port Areas

Public Notice. Winona Bomb Target 2 (#91) Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol

ESTCP Funding Opportunities January 17, 2008

CHAPTER 14 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS

Army National Guard Impact Area Groundwater Study Program

Multi-Increment Soil Sampling: Application to FUDS MMRP SIs

Proposed Plan Closed Sanitary Landfill

Fort Monroe Environmental Cleanup Update. Presented By Julie A. Carver, PE Matrix Design Group, Inc.

Transcription:

Camp Ravenna Restoration Advisory Board Meeting Military Munitions Response Program Time Critical Removal Action at RVAAP-004-R-01 Open Demolition Area #2 MRS 18 NOV 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Agenda Introductions Important Terminology ODA2 Background Information Remedial Investigation Results Probability Assessment Results TCRA Purpose and Scope Buried Explosion Module (BEM) Schedule 1

Important Terminology MILITARY MUNITIONS RESPONSE PROGRAM (MMRP) Addresses MEC and MC in the environment COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA) Federal law designed to clean up sites contaminated with hazardous substances as well as broadly defined "pollutants or contaminants". Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP): DoD s Program for cleaning up legacy contamination under CERCLA NATIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN (NCP) Federal government s framework for responding to both oil spills and hazardous waste releases 2

Important Terminology (continued) REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY (RI/FS) RI - Mechanism for collecting data to characterize site conditions, determine nature of waste, assess potential risk to human health and the environment, and conduct treatability testing to evaluate the potential performance and cost of the treatment technologies that are being considered FS - Mechanism for development, screening, and detailed evaluation of alternative remedial actions TIME CRITICAL REMOVAL ACTION (TCRA) Interim action taken to address immediate risk or hazard to human health or the environment Not a remedial action (final remedy) 3

Important Terminology (continued) MUNITIONS AND EXPLOSIVES OF CONCERN (MEC) Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Military munitions that were a) primed, fused, armed, or otherwise prepared for action; b) fired, dropped, launched, projected, or placed; and c) remain unexploded whether by malfunction, design, or any other cause Discarded Military Munitions (DMM) Military munitions that were abandoned without proper disposal Explosive compounds in high enough concentrations to pose an explosive hazard MUNITIONS CONSTITUENTS (MC) Explosives and non-explosive materials originating from military munitions Explosives and Metals 4

Important Terminology (continued) MATERIAL POTENTIALLY PRESENTING AN EXPLOSIVE HAZARD (MPPEH) Material that prior to determination of its explosive safety status, potentially contains explosives or munitions or potentially contains a high enough concentration of explosives that the material presents an explosive hazard MUNITIONS DEBRIS (MD) Remnants of munitions (e.g., fragments, penetrators, projectiles, shell casings, links, fins, etc.) remaining after munitions use, demilitarization, or disposal This is old terminology, replaced by MPPEH, MDEH, and MDAS. 5

Important Terminology (continued) MATERIAL DOCUMENTED AS SAFE (MDAS) MPPEH that has been assessed and documented as not presenting an explosive hazard and for which the chain of custody has been established and maintained. This material is no longer considered to be MPPEH. 6

Background RVAAP-004-R-01 Open Demolition Area #2 MRS (ODA2 MRS) Historically used to destroy MEC/MPPEH using Open Burn / Open Detonation The RCRA Disposal Unit is not part of the MRS Remedial Investigation (RI) (2009 2015) In 2009, a contract was awarded to conduct RI on 35.4 acres Large kick-out area discovered increased total acreage evaluated during fieldwork to 643 acres Comprehensive nature and extent evaluation was performed Release of MEC and MC identified at the site Final RI Report (2015) modified the MRS boundary to 317.4 acres 7

Remedial Investigation ODA#2 MRS - 2009 Acreage 35.4 acres (based on final SI Report) Localized areas of interest for disposal pits MRS does not include RCRA disposal unit on operational range (illustrated in green) 8

ODA#2 MRS ODA#2 MRS - fieldwork Large kick-out area discovered Calculated based on maximum probable munition and approved Net Explosive Weight for disposal operations Acreage expanded during fieldwork to 643 acres Two primary disposal areas 9

ODA#2 MRS MEC Investigation ODA#2 MRS - fieldwork Subsurface Investigation (MRS 35 acres): 12.53 acres of DGM 1.6 acres mag and dig 19 trenches 3,507 MPPEH items 22 MEC confirmed Visual Survey (buffer area 608 acres) 308 line-miles of transects 1,396 MPPEH items 31 MEC confirmed 10

Material Documented as Safe ODA#2 MRS - fieldwork All but 53 items were determined to be MDAS Disposal Pits: MEC/MPPEH as deep as 10 ft bgs Majority of MEC/MPPEH in kick-out area is at, or near surface No evidence of disposal pits in buffer area Mechanism for release in buffer: aerial dispersion. 11

Revised MRS Boundary ODA#2 MRS - Results Area 1 and Area 2 disposal pits delineated MRS boundary revised to 317.4 acres MEC density estimated between 36.2-44.2 MEC/acre Translates to 1,281-1,565 total possible MEC 12

Probability Assessment ODA#2 MRS USACE Baltimore District conducted Probability Assessment to support interim cleanup action Findings for MEC: 170.4 acres categorized as Moderate to High Probability 140 acres: categorized as Low Probability ~40 acres are inaccessible due to terrain/vegetation 13

Recommendations Conduct a Time Critical Removal Action to address MEC Low Probability Areas Surface clearance to remove MEC/MPPEH 10% surface area intrusive investigation to verify low probability Moderate to High Probability Areas Subsurface Clearance to 4 feet below ground surface (bgs) Clearance limited to 2 feet bgs in disposal pits Confirm lateral extent of known and unknown disposal pits. Inaccessible Areas Verify and delineate inaccessible areas Use Buried Explosion Module (BEM) to reduce potential for release of MC to environment during MEC/MPPEH demolition 14

TCRA Objectives Action Memorandum coordinated with Ohio EPA and final submitted 4 NOV 2015 for approval This action is being taken to mitigate significant explosive safety hazards posed to personnel who may access ODA2 MRS due to exposure to MEC/MPPEH. Reduce explosive hazards in a timely manner Provide additional data for evaluation of final remedial alternatives in the Feasibility Study Execute using inhouse resources: Cost effective Timely response This action will significantly reduce the amount of MEC and MPPEH at the site 15

Buried Explosion Module (BEM) An authorized DoD Engineering Control to prevent fragmentation from traveling great distances and reducing the exclusion to zero feet Allows time critical work for essential personnel to continue when conducting disposal operation Reduces the energy release from rapidly venting into the atmosphere to limit the spread of residual explosives contamination Reduces noise of detonation Re-useable Being used for cleanup operations at Joint Base Cape Cod (aka Massachusetts Military Reservation) 16

BEM Design Capabilities Permanent 40 lbs max Net Explosive Weight Reduce exclusion area to zero feet Reduce dispersion of secondary explosive residue Reusable burial material (sand) Poly Lined to prevent contamination of clean soil underneath and around site 17

BEM Design The BEM is engineered to contain the blast using the mass of the containment media Or put differently, it s a big heavy pile of sand! 18

BEM vs Traditional Demolition 19

Schedule Action Memorandum Approval: 18 December 2015 Approval of Final TCRA Work Plan: March 2016 Removal Action Fieldwork: April 2016 October 2017 After Action Reporting: November 2017 August 2018 20

Questions? Travis R. McCoun, P.G. MMDC Program Manager Baltimore District, Military Munitions Design Center 21