Chapter-3. Screening for varietal resistance of brinjal against Phomopsis vexans

Similar documents
Breeding for Disease Resistance

Screening of Brinjal Germplasm against Wilt Complex Disease

No matter the weather conditions, there will be problematic diseases every year. Which disease may change from year to year.

WEST AFRICA VARIETY CATALOGUE 2017

Breeding advanced tomato varieties for Australian and export markets

Screening techniques and resistance sources for foliar blast in pearl millet

An Efficient Inoculation Method for Artificial Screening of Sheath Blight in Rice

XIII-Workshop. Venue : Jawahar Lal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Jabalpur Date : 15 th 18 th December, 1993

Project Title: Spinach Breeding and Genetics

VASANTDADA SUGAR INSTITUTE, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA. Annual report of AICRP (S) of Plant Pathology discipline for the year

Mass Production of Gummy Stem Blight Spores for Resistance Screening

Chapter Eight Problems of Ginger Cultivation

Mancozeb: An Essential Tool for Sustainable Protection Against Early & Late Potato Blight

it is has a scattered presence across the landscape and inconsistent occurrence from year to year. Although we know that development of Goss s wilt is

REPORT TO THE OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION:

Netaji IAS. Civil Service Mains Agriculture Optional Question Paper 2001

Field Guide Exercises for IPM in CABBAGE (Part II)

Evaluation of Integrated Disease Management Practices against the Powdery Mildew, Anthracnose and Die Back Diseases of Chilli

Innovative Techniques in Agriculture

Comparative Efficacy of Different Isolates of Trichoderma Spp. Against Rhizoctonia Solani, Incitant of Sheath Blight of Rice

Potentials For Improved Disease Control Through Integrated Interdisciplinary Research.

GENETICS OF SLOW- RUSTING RESISTANCE TO LEAF RUST IN BREAD WHEAT

BLACKLEG RESISTANCE IN CANOLA, ITS BREAKDOWN AND LATEST STRATEGIES BEING ADOPTED IN AUSTRALIA TO MANAGE THE DISEASE.

Department of Plant Pathology: College of Agriculture G.B.Pant University of Agric. & Tech. Pantnagar Uttarakhand

Inoculation Technique, Infection Development and Efficacy of Fungicides Against Glomerella cingulata the Causal Agent of Camellia Dieback

I. Bhagat / BIBECHANA 11(1) (2014) : (Online Publication: March, 2014) p.136

PROGRESS REPORT TO THE NEBRASKA DRY BEAN COMMISSION. Core Project Title

A closer look at pulse diseases. Barbara Ziesman Provincial Specialist, Plant Disease 2017 Regional Pulse Meetings

CALIFORNIA ICEBERG LETTUCE RESEARCH PROGRAM. April 1, March 31, 2009

PLP 6404 Epidemiology of Plant Diseases Spring 2015

Host resistance and reduced fungicide application for management of potato late blight (Phytophthora infestans) in South west Ethiopia

ABSTRACT CALIFORNIA LEAFY GREENS RESEARCH PROGRAM

Studies on the Interaction between Varietal Resistance and Management Practices against Leaf Blast of Rice

Evaluation of Different Inoculation Methods for Mango Anthracnose Disease Development

Effect of sowing dates, crop geometry and host range on powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) of fenugreek, Trigonella foenum graecum L.

Population Density of Myzus persicae Sulzer (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Six Cabbage Varieties under New Alluvial Zone

Procedures for Tomato Variety Field Trials

SECTION 2 TRAINING PROGRAMME FOR PROTECTION AGAINST SOUTH AMERICAN LEAF BLIGHT OF RUBBER IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC REGION

Corn and Soybean Disease Concerns

Prepared by Mark Bell, Amanda Crump, Nick Madden and Maria Paz Santibanez 2012 For more information visit: International Programs ip.ucdavis.

Fruit and Shoot Borer-Resistant Eggplant - Fact Sheet -

11. RISK OF PESTS IN PEANUT, INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT, AND PESTICIDE STEWARDSHIP

Improving Canola Yields and Quality Through Best Management Practices for Diseases. Dr. Madeleine Smith

Rhonda Simmons, Bo-Ming Wu, Ken Johnson, and Lindsey dutoit

AND HAZARD TO TUBER HEALTH

Evaluating and Recommending Biopesticides for Vegetable Disease Management. Sally A. Miller Department of Plant Pathology

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF COMPOST, COMPOST TEA, POULTRY LITTER AND BAVISTIN IN CONTROLLING DISEASES OF CHILI ABSTRACT

Rice bacterial blight resistance Screening of mutant and breeding for recombinant inbred line

Biological Control of Sheath Blight Disease of Rice by using Antagonistic Bacteria

Syngenta delivers grower value in sunflowers

Effect of improved tomato cultivars on productivity and profitability in Morogoro region, Tanzania

ARS Research In Support of the NPDRS

Mitigating the risk of blackleg disease of canola using fungicide strategies.

CALIFORNIA ICEBERG LETTUCE RESEARCH PROGRAM. April 1, March 31, 2010

ENVIRONMENTALLY INDUCED VARIABILITY IN THE HOST REACTION OF BARLEY TO NET BLOTCH. By T. N. KHAN* and W. J. R. BOYD*

Epidem16_6 Page 1. Epidem16_6 Page 2

Bio-Efficacy of Carbofuran 3% CG against Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in Tomato

Evaluation of cultivars of potato (Solenum tuberosum) for disease reaction against late blight pathogen [Phytophthora infestans (Mont) de Bary]

Robyne Bowness. Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development Lacombe, AB. Agronomy Update January 18 th, 2011

Soybean Diseases HEATHER KE LLY E XTENSION/RESEA RCH PLAN T PATHOLOGIST UNIVERSITY OF TEN N ESSEE

Testing Methods for Breeding Disease Resistant Vegetables in Japan

An empirical study on farmers knowledge and adoption of improved paddy cultivation practices

LAND PREPARATION. For most crop plants, such a seedbed is one in which the surface soil is loose and free of clods (Fig. 6-18).

Back to Basics: Root rots, Leaf blights and the Disease Triangle. Drs. Anne Dorrance and Pierce Paul

OPEN. (Sacc. & Syd.) - The causative agent of leaf blight and fruit rot disease of Brinjal ( Solanum melongena L.)

Name of the experiment: Estimation of production cost and benefit cost ratio of some vegetable crops

quality in tomatoes and gherkins

Helminthosporium blight of oats in Louisiana

Genes, Mendel and Meiosis

Project Title: Race diversity and the biology of the spinach downy mildew pathogen. CLGRB Annual Report April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013

Int. J. Curr. Res. Biosci. Plant Biol. 4(1), (2017) International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology

Final Report, August 31, Evaluation of Species Susceptibility and Chemical Management of Phomopsis Decline

In vitro and In vivo Evaluation of Fungicides Against Pyricularia oryzae Causing Blast of Rice

CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS AND PATLIOGENICITY AND A. LIMONEA

Science to Support Plant Protection for Horticulture AAFC s Science & Technology Branch

Bacterial blight in field pea


2019 SOYBEANS SEED- AND SOIL-BORNE SOYBEAN DISEASE AND INSECT GUIDE VARIETY SELECTION AND POSITIONING

Effect of Training Need for Papaya Growers in Begusarai District of Bihar

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(10):

Eco-Label Opportunities for Processing Vegetable Crops. W. R. Stevenson J. A. Wyman P. Rogers L. Granadino

2018 Soybeans. Variety Selection and Positioning

Ornamental Pearl Millet: An Introduction to Plant Breeding. By: Alyssa Converse

Canola Diseases. Kurtis Schroeder Department of Plant Pathology Washington State University Pullman, WA

Dr. N.Vijayan Nair Director

Development of Plant Diseases Disease of a plant could simply be defined as any alteration of one or more of the ordered series of physiological

Lecture 13 - Different methods of Nematode Control

This presentation is available at Borges, University of Wisconsin Agronomy

Genetic Analysis of Rust and Late Leaf Spot in Advanced Generation Recombinant Inbred Lines of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

ECONOMIC PROFILE OF RICE CULTIVATION IN PUNJAB

The Sugarcane: An Agriculture Aspect

Long term impact of soybean rust on the Midwest corn-soybean rotation system

Farm Innovation Program

Applying next-generation sequencing to enable marker-assisted breeding for adaptive traits in a homegrown haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.

Yield Gains in Sunflower. Brent S. Hulke USDA-ARS-Northern Crop Science Laboratory Larry W. Kleingartner National Sunflower Association

Growth in area, production and productivity of major crops in Karnataka*

SEASONAL INFLUENCE ON THE OCCURRENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF BLAST OF FINGER MILLET (ELEUSINE CORACANA (L.) GAERTN.) UNDER FIELD CONDITION

A High Yielding Indica-Japonica-Hybrid Rice Variety Hoshiyutaka

IELTS Academic Reading Sample 57 - Biological Control of Pests. Biological Control of Pests

Northern Stripe Rust Management: An Evaluation of Seed Treatment Efficacy and Benefits

Transcription:

Chapter-3 Screening for varietal resistance of brinjal against Phomopsis vexans

Introduction Brinjal being native to India is one of the most common vegetable crops of the country and it is also called poor man s vegetable. Brinjal is grown for its unripe, immature fruits, which are used as cooked vegetable and in curries. In the areas experiencing high temperature and humidity during rainy season, the production of brinjal suffers immensely due to the attack of disease and insect pests. Among the diseases threatening the cultivation of brinjal, Phomopsis leaf blight and fruit rot are the most serious disease as this can affect at any stage of its development and lead to complete loss of the crop. The pathogen usually soil as well as seedborne and therefore it is very difficult to manage the disease by chemical control method alone. Chemical management of the disease also leaves behind the many toxic residues in the soil affecting the consumers health. In view of these, there is need for search for innate durable resistance in brinjal cultivars, so that same cultivars could be used for growing as well as breeding purpose for further improvement. Studies conducted to screen for resistant varieties of brinjal against P.vexans met with little success. Hence in the present study an attempt has been made screen popular varieties of brinjal for durable resistance against Phomopsis vexans. Materials and Methods Collection of Brinjal Samples A total of 16 cultivars were collected from different sources including agrotraders and farmers. The most widely cultivated cultivar in Karnataka is Brinjal cv. purple pusa long, Manju (F1 Hybrid) Hybrid, Ankush green long, MEBH9, MEBH10, Brinjal Seeds (Green round) and Kalpataru hybrid seeds. The list of brinjal cultivars used in the present study for varietal resistance is presented in Table-3.0.

Preparation of fungal inoculum Fourteen (14) day old culture of Phomopsis vexans was isolated on Potato Dextrose Agar medium from fruit rot and leaf blight affected brinjal sample. The pure culture was used for inoculum preparation. Using sterile needle, pycnidia were dislodged into sterile distilled water. The suspension was filtered through cheese cloth to remove bigger particles. The alpha conidial suspension was adjusted to 1x10 5 conidia/ml using Haemocytometre and used for foliar spray using glass automizer. Screening for resistant cultivars of brinjal under green house conditions A total of 16 commercial cultivars of brinjal seeds were used in the present investigation for screening for the resistance under green house condition. Seedlings were raised in nursery and were transferred to pots filled with sterilized soil, farmyard manure and sand (2:1:1). Twenty five 25 day old seedlings were sprayed with conidial suspension of Phomopsis vexans and initiation of leaf blight and fruit rot symptoms were recorded after 10 days post inoculation until the crop reached harvest stage. Based on the incidence of leaf blight and fruit rot disease on each cultivar, disease incidence and nature of resistance of each cultivar was determined. The disease resistance/susceptibility of each cultivar was recorded. Seedlings inoculated with sterile water served as control. Evaluation of varietal resistance against P. vexans in field condition A total of 16 commercial cultivars used earlier in green house experiment were also evaluated under field conditions in farmer fields situated near Mysuru (Marayyanahundi). The field blocks were 2.5x3m (length and width). Seedlings of all 16 cultivars were raised in nursery and 35days old seedlings were transferred to fields. A total of 90 seedlings were planted for each cultivar (9 rows and 10plants/row). After 30 days of transplantation and with all agronomic practices, conidial suspension of P. vexans was sprayed and initiation of leaf blight and fruit rot symptoms were observed after 10 days post inoculation until

the crop reached harvest stage. Development of fruit rot disease was observed after 50-60 days of post inoculation. Table: 3.0. List of Brinjal cultivars used in the present investigations for screening resistant cultivars. Sl. No Cultivar/Variety Origin/Producer 01 Hybrid Brinjal seeds MEBH 10-Super 10 Mahyco, Mumbai, India 02 Malapur -Mrityunjaya seeds Mrityunjaya Seed corporation, Dharwad, Karnataka, India 03 Hybrid Brinjal seeds- Kamadhenu Tanindo Seed Pvt. Ltd. Banglore, India. 04 Hybrid Brinjal seeds MHB 11 (Improved) Mahyco, Mumbai, India 05 Hybrid Brinjal Ankush- BRANK25-1227 Srujana Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Banglore, India. 06 Hybrid Egg Plant- Manju (F1 Hybrid) Syngenta India Limited, Mumbai, India. 07 Brinjal F1- Hybrid Jyothi Prabhakar Hybrid Seeds, Banglore, India 08 Brinjal- Brinjal Varikathri Nethra Seeds Corporation, Banglore, India. 09 Hybrid Brinjal Seeds- MEBH 11 Mahyco, Mumbai, India 10 Brinjal Seeds (Green round) Sagar Hybrid Seeds Company, Hyderabad, India. 11 Brinjal- Pusa Purple Long. National Seed Corporation Ltd. New Delhi, India 12 Brinjal seeds- Ruchika Pradham Biotech Pvt. Ltd Hyderabad, India 13 Kalpataru- Hybrid Brinjal Seeds MEBH10 Mahyco, Mumbai, India 14 F1 Hybrid Brinjal SBH- Sarpan brinjal Seeds SARPAN Hybrid seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd, Dharwad, Karnataka 15 Local Brinjal Seeds* Doddamaragowdanahally, Mysuru, Karnataka, India

16 Local Brinjal Seeds* Netkalu, Malavally, Mandya, Karnataka, India. *Seed samples processed by farmers for recycle purpose were procured directly and were preserved at 4 C for further use. Disease scale for calculating leaf blight disease and fruit rot disease As there is no disease assessment scale available for brinjal, a disease scale has been developed to calculate the leaf blight disease and fruit rot disease. For the assessment of leaf blight disease, a disease scale of 0-5 was used (0- highly resistant, 1-5-resistant, 6-15-moderately resistant, 16-30 intermediate, 31-60- suseptible, > 61-Highly susceptible respectively. Similarly, a disease scale of 0-5 was used for fruit rot disease assessment. The disease scale of 0-5 (0-highly resistant, 1-20 resistant, 21-40 moderately resistant, 41-50 intermediate, 51-70, susceptible, 71-100-highly susceptible was used. This scale has been used to calculate disease incidence on leaf and fruit of brinjal. The disease scale used for assessing leaf blight and fruit rot disease is presented in Table-3.1 (Mrindha et al. (2007). Table: 3.1. Disease scale for leaf blight and fruit rot disease of brinjal against Phomopsis vexans. Severity Scale for leaf Leaf surface affected (%) Nature of resistance/ susceptibility Fruit surface affected (%) Severity Scale for fruit 0 0 Highly Resistant (HR) 0 0 1 1-5 Resistant (R) 1-20 1 2 6-15 Moderately Resistant MR 21-40 2 3 16-30 Intermediate (I) 41-50 3 4 31-60 Susceptible (S) 51-70 4

5 61-100 Highly Susceptible (HS) 71-100 5 Results Screening for resistance under green house condition The results of cultivar screening for leaf blight disease of brinjal are provided in Table 3.0 and Fig. 3.1 respectively. A total of 16 cultivars were screened under green house condition with conidial application of P. vexans. The study revealed that, very high incidence of leaf blight disease of 84% and 82% was recorded in two local cultivars of brinjal followed by 78% in Malapur cultivar. Low incidence of leaf blight disease of 11% and 22% were recorded in MEBH10 and MEBH11 cultivars respectively. Similarly the incidence of fruit rot disease was also evaluated on 16 cultivars based on the fruit rot disease incidence. The study showed that high incidence of fruit rot disease of 72% and 69% was recorded in two local cultivars of brinjal followed by incidence of 64% in Malapur cultivar. Very low incidence of fruit rot disease of 14% and 22% were recorded in two hybrid cultivars namely MEBH10 and MEBH11 respectively. Based on the screening method adapted under green house condition for leaf blight disease all the 16 cultivars were classified as 4-highly susceptible cultivars (> 61%), 7-susceptible (31-60%), 4-intermediate (16-30%) and 1 moderately resistant (6-15%) respectively for leaf blight disease. More or less similar trend was observed in all the 16 cultivars when screened against fruit rot disease under green house condition. Out of 16 cultivars, 4-highly susceptible (71-80%), 7- susceptible (51-70%), 4-intermediate (41-50%) and 1-moderately resistant (21-30%) cultivars were found. No cultivar was found resistant or blight resistant among 16 cultivars screened against fruit rot disease. Screening for varietal resistance under field condition

The results of field evaluation of brinjal cultivars for leaf blight and fruit rot disease is presented in Table-3.2 and Fig. 3.3, 3.5 & 3.4 respectively. Out of 16 cultivars screened for leaf blight disease four cultivars were highly susceptible to leaf blight disease. The study revealed that, very high incidence of leaf blight disease of 68% and 74% was recorded in Malapur and one local cultivars of brinjal. Lower incidence of leaf blight disease of 9% was recorded in MEBH10 cultivar. Similarly the incidence of fruit rot disease was also evaluated on 16 cultivars based on the fruit rot disease incidence. The study showed that high incidence of fruit rot disease of 83 and 84% was recorded in one local cultivar and Malapur seeds of brinjal followed by incidence of 79% in Local brinjal seeds 16. Very low incidence of fruit rot disease of 10% was recorded in MEBH10 cultivar. Based on the screening method adapted under field evaluation, for leaf blight disease all the 16 cultivars were classified as 4-highly susceptible cultivars (>61%), 7-susceptible (31-60%), 4-intermediate (16-30%) and 1 moderately resistant (6-15%) respectively for leaf blight disease. More or less similar trend was observed in all the 16 cultivars when screened against fruit rot disease under green house condition. Out of 16 cultivars, 4-highly susceptible (71-80%), 7- susceptible (51-70%), 4-intermediate (41-50%) and 1-moderately resistant (21-30%) cultivar was found. No cultivar was found resistant or highly resistant among 16 cultivars screened against fruit rot disease.

Discussion Plants are endowed with different types of resistance, so also many crop plants. Durable resistance is the resistance that remains effective in a cultivar that is widely grown for a long period of time. It cannot be identified immediately, as it should be grown for a long time. Durable resistance can be identified based on relative performance of other cultivars during evaluation or screening. Searching for durable disease resistance in crop plants has been a continuous process by which host itself plays the role of an antagonist (Singh, 1975). As many plant pathogens including fungal pathogens coming with varied degrees of virulence these days, resistant varieties can be the most simple, practical and effective and economical method of plant disease control. They also ensure protection against diseases and also save time, energy and money. For many diseases such as wilts, rusts, and other viral diseases, resistant varieties are the only practical method of disease control. The terms monogenic, polygenic, vertical, horizontal, specific and general resistance are being used to explain the type of resistance in plants against invading plant pathogens. Two basic types of resistance mechanisms have been recognized in plants, they are specific and general resistance. When the defense mechanism in plants is controlled by a single gene pair it is known as monogenic resistance. Varieties with monogenic resistance remain completely free from pathogen attack in different environments. This type of resistance is stable only until new races of pathogen emerge. When the resistance is controlled by synergistic action of more than one minor group of supplementary genes, the type of resistance is known as generalized or polygenic resistance. The polygenic resistance is likely to disappear with change in the environments. However, it is more tolerant to evolution of new races of the pathogen. It remains useful for a longer period. However, resistance developed by

combination of many dominant and recessive genes is more desirable in crop plants. During crop improvement programme for disease resistance, three common methods are employed, namely; selection, mutation and hybridization. Screening for disease resistance is pre-requisite for breeding programme. As brinjal is one of the important vegetable crops, and is largely grown in different parts of the country, it is desirable to have stocks of resistance cultivars for cultivation in different agro-climatic regions of India, so that the crop could be protected from existing and new races of pathogen. However, no studies have been conducted for varietal screening for disease resistance in brinjal against fungal, bacterial or viral plant pathogens. In view of the above, in the present study, 16 popular cultivars of brinjal collected from different sources were screened against P. vexans. Among these very low incidence of leaf blight disease (11%) was recorded only on Brinjal Hybrid MEBH10. Similarly the low incidence of fruit rot disease (14%) was also recorded in cultivar MEBH10. Hence the study showed that cultivar MEBH10 to certain extent showed moderate resistance against P. vexans the causative agent of leaf blight disease. Similarly, among 16 cultivars of brinjal screened under field evaluation for leaf blight and fruit rot disease, low incidence of leaf blight and fruit rot disease were recorded in MEBH10 cultivar. None of the other cultivars exhibited some degree resistance to leaf blight and fruit rot disease. The present study clearly identified the moderately resistant MEBH10 variety only to certain extent against P. vexans. Similar studies on resistance to Phomopsis fruit rot in brinjal was investigated by Datar and Ashtaputre (1988). Studies on resistance to Phomopsis blight in brinjal were also studied by Kalda et al. (1976). Phomopsis blight in brinjal and sources of resistance was also studied by Pandey et al. (2002). Test on brinjal resisting to Phomopsis rot was studied by Ren and Zhang (1993). Further, control of Phomopsis fruit rot of brinjal with different fungicides and also economics was studied by Grewal and Jhooty (1987); Islam and Pan

(1989 and 1993). Efficacy of certain fungicides in controlling Phomospsis vexans causing fruit rot of Brinjal was studied by Mohanty et al. (1994). However no durable resistance was discovered. Brinjal is the leading vegetable in the country in terms of hectare and volume of production in India. It is a very versatile vegetable which can be taken alone as a dish or mixed with other vegetables. Its production constraint is the Phomopsis blight which is caused by Phomopsis vexans (Sacc and Syd) Harter. The disease is seed-borne and can cause disease in the next season. Host resistance is the most practical and environment-safe method against this pathogen. The present study, though identified MEBH10 cultivar is moderately resistant to P. vexans. The degree of resistance may not be sufficient to protect the brinjal crop against fungal pathogen. Therefore, further, work needs to be carried out to identify the durable resistance to P.vexans.

Sl. No. Table: 3.2. Brinjal cultivars inoculated with conidial suspension of Phomopsis vexans to record the disease incidence and severity under green house condition for leaf blight and fruit rot disease. Cultivar/Variety Source Leaf Blight (%) Mahyco, Mumbai, 01 Hybrid Brinjal seeds MEBH 10-Super 10 02 Malapur -Mrityunjaya seeds India Mrityunjaya Seed corporation, Dharwad, Karnataka, India 03 Hybrid Brinjal seeds- Kamadhenu Tanindo Seed Pvt. Ltd. Banglore, India. 04 Hybrid Brinjal seeds Mahyco, Mumbai, MHB 11 (Improved)- India Bulldozer 05 Hybrid Brinjal Ankush- Srujana Seeds Pvt. Ltd. BRANK25-1227 Banglore, India. 06 Hybrid Egg Plant- Manju Syngenta India (F1 Hybrid) Limited, Mumbai, India. 07 Brinjal F1- Hybrid Jyothi Prabhakar Hybrid Seeds, Banglore, India 08 Brinjal- Brinjal Varikathri Nethra Seeds Corporation, Banglore, India. 09 Hybrid Brinjal Seeds- MEBH 11 10 Brinjal Seeds (Green round) 11 Brinjal- Pusa Purple Long. Mahyco, Mumbai, India Sagar Hybrid Seeds Company, Hyderabad, India. National Seed Corporation Ltd. New Delhi, India 12 Brinjal seeds- Ruchika Pradham Biotech Pvt. Ltd Hyderabad, India 13 Kalpataru- Hybrid Brinjal Mahyco, Mumbai, Seeds MEBH10 India 14 F1 Hybrid Brinjal SBH- SARPAN Hybrid seeds Sarpan brinjal Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd, Dharwad, Karnataka 15 Local Brinjal Seeds Doddamaragowdanahal ly, Mysuru, Karnataka, India 16 Local Brinjal Seeds Netkalu, Mandya, Malavally, Karnataka, India. Values given are mean of three replicates Nature of resistance Fruit Rot Disease (%) 11 MR 14 MR 78 HS 64 HS 23 I 22 I 52 S 39 S 24 I 18 I 42 S 54 S 51 S 36 S 64 HS 65 HS 22 I 24 I 46 S 37 S 59 S 49 S 27 I 25 I 55 S 38 S 58 S 42 S 82 HS 72 HS 84 HS 69 HS Nature of Resistance (Hybrid Brinjal seeds MHB 11 (Improved)-Bulldozer, Hybrid brinjal- Manju (F1 Hybrid), Brinjal F1- Hybrid Jyothi, Brinjal Seeds (Green round)

Table: 3.3. Brinjal cultivars inoculated with conidial suspension of Phomopsis vexans to record the leaf blight and fruit rot disease under field evaluation. Sl. No Cultivar/Vari ety 01 Hybrid Brinjal seeds MEBH 10-Super 10 02 Malapur - Mrityunjaya seeds 03 Hybrid Brinjal seeds- Kamadhenu 04 Hybrid Brinjal seeds MHB 11 (Improved)- Bulldozer 05 Hybrid Brinjal Ankush- BRANK25-1227 06 Hybrid Egg Plant- Manju (F1 Hybrid) 07 Brinjal F1- Hybrid Jyothi 08 Brinjal- Brinjal Varikathri 09 Hybrid Brinjal Seeds- MEBH 11 10 Brinjal Seeds (Green round) 11 Brinjal- Pusa Purple Long. 12 Brinjal seeds- Ruchika 13 Kalpataru- Hybrid Brinjal Seeds MEBH10 14 F1 Hybrid Brinjal SBH- Sarpan brinjal Seeds 15 Local Brinjal Seeds 16 Local Brinjal Seeds Origin/Producer Leaf Blight Disease incidence Nature of the cultivar Fruit Rot disease Mahyco, Mumbai, India 9 MR 10 MR Mrityunjaya Seed corporation, Dharwad, Karnataka, India Tanindo Seed Pvt. Ltd. Banglore, India. 68 HS 84 HS 25 I 29 I Mahyco, Mumbai, India 44 S 46 S Srujana Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Banglore, India. Syngenta India Limited, Mumbai, India. 21 I 22 I 38 S 53 S Prabhakar Hybrid Seeds, Banglore, India 47 S 58 S Nethra Seeds Corporation, 69 HS 78 HS Banglore, India. Mahyco, Mumbai, India 26 I 21 I Sagar Hybrid Seeds Company, Hyderabad, India. 39 S 52 S National Seed Corporation 41 S 57 S Ltd. New Delhi, India Pradham Biotech Pvt. Ltd 19 I 19 I Hyderabad, India Mahyco, Mumbai, India 55 S 42 S SARPAN Hybrid seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd, Dharwad, Karnataka Doddamaragowdanahally, Mysuru, Karnataka, India Netkalu, Mandya, Malavalli, Karnataka, India. 47 S 54 S 66 HS 83 HS 74 HS 79 HS Nature of the cultivar

Figure: 3.0. Brinjal seedlings in nursery for varietal screening for resistant cultivars of brinjal before they are transplanted to fields.

Figure-3.1: Evaluation of brinjal cultivars for varietal screening for resistance under green house condition.

Figure -3.2 :Evaluation of Brinjal cultivars for varietal screening for resistance underfield condition near Mysuru.

Figure -3.3: Evaluation of Brinjal cultivars for varietal screening for resistance under field condition near Mysuru showing leaf blight disease on local cultivar.

Figure-3.4: Evaluation of Brinjal cultivars for varietal screening for resistance under field condition near K. R. Nagar, Mysore District showing leaf blight disease on local cultivar.