CDC STATISTICS FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT (FSMA) (FSMA) RULEMAKING PROCESS AND HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS 02/12/13

Similar documents
Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Proposed Sec. 105 Produce Rule

FDA s Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food

FSMA S PRODUCE SAFETY RULE

GAPS, FSMA and the Produce Rule

FSMA and Produce Safety Rule Final

FSMA Produce Rule: Domestic and Foreign Farms Impacted

New Mexico Department of Agriculture Produce Safety Division S. Espina Las Cruces N.M

FSMA and Proposed Produce Safety Rule Update

Food Safety Modernization Act. Final Rules

Final Produce Safety Rule Webinar December 17th, PM EST

Pecan Production and the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

Food Safety Modernization Act Oklahoma Training Programs. Lynn Brandenberger Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture

Are you in or out? Overview of new regulations and who they apply to Faith Critzer Food Safety Assistant Professor

Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) & FSMA Produce Safety Rule Overview

Welcome. OnTrak with FSMA: A Webinar Series. Hosted By: Presentation by:

Oregon s Produce Industries and FSMA

Food Safety Modernization Act Info Session Revised Handout August 1, 2013 at SOREC

Final Rules Preventive Controls for Human Food Preventive Controls for Animal Food

Overview of the FSMA Rules

9/4/2015. Food Safety Modernization Act. AFBF Introduction. FSMA Background. Proposed Regulations/Deadlines

FSMA: How s your food traceability? Learn best practices to stay compliant utilizing cloud ERP technologies

Broccoli Produce Safety Part I: Produce Safety Overview Elizabeth A. Bihn, Ph.D. Produce Safety Alliance, Director Cornell University Part II: Post

What is the Food Safety Modernization Act and how will it affect you? Elena Rogers Area Specialized Agent, Food Safety- Fresh Produce

FSMA FACTS. Final Rule on Preventive Controls for Human Food

20 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FSMA

WELCOME! Overview of Draft Guidance to Industry: Compliance with and Recommendations for Implementing FDA s Produce Safety Rule for Sprout Operations

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA): FDA Proposed Animal Feed Rule Florida Overview. Susan Caime Mardenborough September 18, 2014

FSMA: Understanding FDA s New Food Safety Rules

Implementation of the FSMA. Produce Safety Rule in VA

1/29/2016. IFVGA 2016 FSMA Produce Rule Summary FDA FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT FSMA FDA: FSMA PRODUCE SAFETY REGULATIONS

RE: PETITION FOR REGULATIONS TO ADDRESS PRODUCE SAFETY

The Food Safety Modernization Act and Its Implications for USDA and Dual Jurisdiction Establishments

Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food

FSMA IMPLEMENTATION A FRESH PRODUCE INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE

The Food Safety Modernization Act: What Exporters to the U.S. Need to Know. Erik R. Lieberman Prepared for AgroBalt 2014 April 4, 2014

FDA Produce Rule 101. WSDA Produce Safety Program. Jill Wisehart, MEd

FDA Publishes Final FSMA Preventive Control Rules

Food Safety for Direct Sales

What s New with the FSMA Rules? Co-Sponsored by:

IFMA Workshop

An Update of FDA Produce Safety Activities. Mickey Parish, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Office of Food Safety FDA/CFSAN

Regulatory Impacts of the PC Rule on Massachusetts Food Facilities

Food Safety Update: Risk and Consequences. Dr. Angela Shaw

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Key Points for Warehouses. June David Hakes-Regulatory Manager

FDA s Food Safety Modernization Act: An Overview

The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act

What Initiated the Need for a Food Safety Plan

Module 1: Introduction to Produce Safety

Implications of the 2011 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act on Direct Farm Marketers and Value-Added Producers

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

3M Food Safety and The Acheson Group present FSMA: How do I comply? Webinar series

FDA FSMA Timeline. July 29, 2009 House version passed. Nov. 30, 2010 Senate version passed. Dec. 19, 2010 Senate revised version passed

November 15, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

FSMA An Overview. Food Safety Modernization Act Informational Seminar. March 10, 2016

3M Food Safety and The Acheson Group present FSMA: How do I comply? Webinar series

Food Safety and FSMA: Nothing New to the Almond Industry. Tim Birmingham Almond Board of California

FSMA and Grain Handlers

FSMA Produce Safety Rule Basics for Tree Fruits

GGAP Applicable Regulations for HPSS

Impacts on the Grain and Feed Industry

Navigating the U.S. FDA Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) Rule. Presented by: Bracey Parr Regulatory Specialist February 28 nd, 2018

FOOD SAFETY PROGRAM JANUARY 30, 31 & FEBRUARY 1

FSMA s Foreign Supplier Verification Program

Produce Safety Challenges & Opportunities. Jim Gorny, Ph.D. Vice President of Food Safety & Technology

Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Rule, Standards for Growing, Harvesting,

Learning Objectives and Critical Concepts

Food Safety Modernization Act: How will it Impact Your Business? Henry Turlington, PhD Director, Quality & Manufacturing Regulatory Affairs

U.S. FSMA Seminar: Practices

FDA Publishes Final Rule on CGMPs, Hazard Analysis, and Preventive Controls for Human Food

Community Alliance with Family Farmers

US FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT (FSMA) IMPACTS ON GLOBAL FOOD TRADE, CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING

FSMA compliance update

Consumer interest in food has been

Food Safety Modernization Act

Land # Section, Number Question Doc Points Page # 1 General, #P-1 A documented food safety program that

GAP and Its Impact on Us as Growers. Rich Bonanno UMass Extension

FSMA Produce Rule Summary for Midwest Orchards

VT Produce Safety Continuum

Value-Added On-Farm Processing

Whitepaper April 2014 UNDERSTANDING THE US FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT 2011

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) & Imports of Food Products. August 9 th, 2016 Russell Statman, Registrar Corp

Guidelines for Food Safety in Hydroponic Production

Starting on the Right Track

TOMATO BEST PRACTICES MANUAL

The Red Seal Your Road to FSMA and Quality Compliance

Microbial Water Quality and Fresh Market Vegetables

FSMA Food Safety Modernization Act Frequently Asked Questions

FDA Issues Supplemental Preventive Controls Proposed Rules Under FSMA

FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH SEMINARS

3M Food Safety and The Acheson Group present FSMA: How do I comply? Webinar series

Matt Lollar & Bob Hochmuth University of Florida/IFAS Extension

Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, & Risk Based Preventive Controls for Animal Foods 21 CFR Part 507

North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services Steve Troxler, Commissioner

F. Role of Supplier Approval and Verification Programs in a Food Safety System

Introduction. Seafood HACCP Alliance Training Course 3-1

California. California. Food Safety Guidelines. Food Safety Guidelines

While comprehensive, this document does not replace a thorough review of the Rule to assure proper compliance.

What a Preventive Controls Facility Looks Like. FSMA-HARPC vs. HACCP

This is a Grower Manual for Documentation for a USDA GAP audit Part 1

Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs.

Transcription:

EVERY YEAR: CDC STATISTICS 48 MILLION PEOPLE (1 IN 6) GET SICK 128,000 HOSPITALIZED 3,000 DIE From foodborne diseases: Hepatitis A Botulism Listeriosis Laurie George Extension Educator Small Farms/Local Foods Escherichia coli Salmonellosis FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT (FSMA) FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT (FSMA) Signed into law January 4, 2011 Designed to ensure U.S. food supply is safe Focuses on preventing contamination rather than responding to it Will have 5 proposed rulemakings http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/fsma/default.htm RULEMAKING PROCESS AND HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS Both proposed rules are published in the Federal Register so the public can review it and submit comments. FDA considers comments received during the comment period and then considers revising the rules, based on the comments, before issuing a final rule. Proposed and final rules and supporting documents are filed in FDA s official docket on http://www.regulations.gov and also can be accessed on the FSMA website. 1

2 proposed rules released for public comment: 1. Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption (released January 4, 2013) 2. Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food (released January 4, 2013 re-released January 16, 2013) PROPOSED RULE #1 Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption Docket #: FDA-2011-N-0921 http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/fsma/ucm334114.htm Science-based standards for growing, harvesting, packing and holding produce on domestic and foreign farms Proposed produce rule covers most fruits and vegetables while they are in their raw or natural (unprocessed) state*. FDA proposing requirements be effective 60 days after a final rule is published. Compliance dates would be phased in based on business size *produce means fruits and vegetables grown for human consumption Who is covered by this rule? Farm mixed-type facilities grows and harvests produce and conducts activities such as processing fresh-cut produce that requires the establishment to be registered. Only the establishment s farm activities would be subject to the proposed rule. Partial-Exempt farms must meet 2 requirements: Have food sales averaging less than $500,000 per year during the last three years (adjusted for inflation) Sales to qualified end-users* must exceed their sales to others during the same period. * end-user = consumer, restaurant, or retail food establishment located in same state as the farm or not more than 275 miles away from the farm. Partial-Exempt farms if qualify labeling requirements would apply Label currently required on produce = name/address of business where produce was grown (tomatoes in clam shell) No label currently required = name and business address of farm where produce was grown must be displayed at point of purchase (poster) Certain produce is excluded: Low risk produce with respect to biological hazards Rarely eaten raw (potatoes) Produce destined for further processing that includes a kill step Other proposed exemptions: Produce for personal or on-farm consumption The smallest farms those with an average annual value of food sold during the previous three year period of $25,000 or less 2

Does your farm grow, harvest, pack or hold produce? You are T covered by this rule Is your produce rarely consumed raw? This produce is T covered by this rule PROPOSED STANDARDS FOR PRODUCE SAFETY COVERAGE AND EXEMPTIONS/EXCLUSIONS FOR PROPOSED 21 PART 112 Is your produce for personal/on-farm consumption? Does your farm manufacture/process, pack, or hold produce that is not a Raw Agricultural Commodity (RAC)? Is your produce intended for commercial processing with a kill step? Does your farm on average (in the previous 3 yrs) have <$25K annual food sales? Does your farm on average (in the previous 3 yrs) : Have <$500K annual food sales, AND A majority of the food (by value) sold directly to qualified end-users? Qualified end-user Section 112.3(c) means: *the consumer for the food (not a business) This produce is T covered by this rule Produce that is not a RAC is T covered by this rule This produce is T covered by this rule, EXCEPT as per Sections 112.(b)(2) and (3) You are T covered by this rule You are EXEMPT from this rule except as per OR Section 112.6 * a restaurant or retail food establishment that is located in the same State as the farm that produced the food; OR *No more than 275 miles from such a farm You are COVERED by this rule http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/fsma/ucm334552.htm Focuses on identified routes of microbial contamination of produce, including: Agricultural water establish criteria for quality of water and require periodic analytical testing Agricultural Water = in part as water that is intended or likely to contact covered produce or food-contact surfaces Beginning of growing season, the water system components be inspected to identify conditions that are likely to introduce pathogens to produce or food-contact surfaces http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/fsma/ucm334552.htm Biological soil amendments of Animal Origin 3 measures to reduce risk: 1. types of treatment 2. methods of application 3. time intervals between application and crop harvest Provisions pertaining to the handling and storage of biological soil amendments of animal origin Focuses on identified routes of microbial contamination of produce, including: Health and Hygiene farm personnel use hygienic practices hand washing and personal cleanliness Domesticated and Wild Animals introduction into production systems via animal feces. 1. adequate waiting period between grazing of domesticated or working animals and harvesting produce. 2. Monitor for significant wild animal intrusion events before harvest and as needed during growing season. Do not harvest produce visibly contaminated. Focuses on identified routes of microbial contamination of produce, including: Equipment, tools, and buildings set standards for certain equipment and tools, buildings, and sanitation used for produce operations on farms. OTHER AREAS: Sprouts treating seed before sprouting, testing spent irrigation water for pathogens, monitoring growing environment Training would be required for farm personnel and supervisors Recordkeeping require certain records to document that standards are being met 3

Very small businesses = having, on a rolling basis, an average annual monetary value of food sold during the previous 3 years of no more than $250,000 will have four years after the effective date to comply. For some of the water requirements, would have 6 years Other Businesses = comply two years after the effective date. For some of the water requirements, would have 4 years to comply. Small businesses = having, on a rolling basis, an average annual monetary value of food sold during the previous 3 years of no more than $500,000 will have three years after the effective date to comply. For some of the water requirements, would have 5 years. PROPOSED RULE #2 Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food Docket #: FDA-2011-N-0920 http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/fsma/ucm334115.htm Preventative controls for human food that focuses on preventing problems that can cause foodborne illness Applies to many domestic and foreign firms that manufacture, process, pack or hold human food Require written plans that identify hazards, specify steps to minimize hazards, identify monitoring procedures, record results, and specify actions to correct problems that arise FDA will evaluate the plans and inspect facilities Who is covered by this rule? Applies to facilities that manufacture, process, pack or hold human food Facilities required to register include manufacturers, processors, warehouses, storage tanks and grain elevators. Exemptions: Exemptions and modified requirements for preventive controls for human food can be found at: http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/fsma/ucm334115.htm 4

http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/fsma/ucm334115.htm Two major features: 1. New provisions requiring hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls 2. Would revise the existing Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) requirements The new preventive control requirements and the modified CGMPs would be placed in a new Part 117: Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Control for Human Food Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls Owner, operator, agent in charge of facilities required to register (with exceptions), will comply with hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls Require controls only where necessary to prevent hazards to public health Exempt certain facilities from requirements or modify requirements for certain low-risk activities Firms could develop preventive controls that fit their products and operations as long as is adequate to significantly minimize or prevent all food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls Similar to Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) systems (juice and seafood) Differs in that the proposed rule may require preventive controls at points other than at critical control points and critical limits would not be required for all preventive controls Each covered facility will be required to prepare and implement a written food safety plan, which would include: 1. A Hazard Analysis ID s and evaluates known hazards for each type of food manufactured, processed, or held at the facility 2. Preventive Controls process, food allergens, sanitation, and recall plan 3. Monitoring to assure controls are performed 4. Corrective actions should controls not be implemented properly 5. Verification - to ensure controls are implemented and effective 6. Recordkeeping food safety plan, controls, etc Revisions to the Current Good Manufacturing Practices Current CGMP provision requiring protection against contamination of food also require protection against cross-contact of food by allergens FDA requesting comment on whether it should mandate training for employees, supervisors, and whether it should require (rather than recommend) certain provisions such as cleaning non-food contact surfaces of equipment as frequently as necessary to protect against contamination of food and food-contact surfaces Very small businesses = 3 proposal options to define Less than $250,000 in total annual sales of food Less than $500,000 in total annual sales of food Less than $1,000,000 in total annual sales of food Would have to comply 3 years after publication of final rule 5

Small businesses = business that employs fewer than 500 persons that does not qualify for an exemption would have to comply 2 years after publication of the final rule. Other Businesses a business that is not small or very small and does not qualify for an exemption would have to comply 1 year after publication of the final rule. COMMENTS FOR BOTH PROPOSED RULES ARE DUE BY MAY 16, 2013 http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/fsma/ucm261689.htm ADDITIONAL DOCKETS OPEN FOR COMMENT What You Need To Know About Registration of Food Facilities; Small Entity Compliance Guide Guidance for Industry Docket Number: FDA-2012-D-1003 6, comments submitted anytime Questions and Answers Regarding Food Facility Registration (Fifth Edition) 7 Guidance for Industry Docket Number: FDA-2012-D-1002 8, comments submitted anytime Necessity of the Use of Food Product Categories in Food Facility Registrations and Updates to Food Product Categories 9 Guidance for Industry Docket Number: FDA-2012-D-0585 10, comments submitted anytime Questions and Answers Regarding Establishment and Maintenance of Records By Persons Who Manufacture, Process, Pack, Transport, Distribute, Receive, Hold, or Import Food (Edition 5) 11 Guidance for Industry Docket Number: FDA-2011-D-0598 12, comments submitted anytime What You Need to Know About Administrative Detention of Foods 13 Guidance for Industry Docket Number: FDA-2011-D-0643 14, comments submitted anytime Implementation of the Fee Provisions of Section 107 of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act 15 Guidance for Industry Docket Number: FDA-2011-D-0721 16, comments submitted anytime FOOD SAFETY (GAPs) TRAINING February 19, 2013 Food Safety on the Farm Ogle county http://web.extension.illinois.edu/units/event.cfm?unitid=463&eventid=60153 March 12, 2013 Food Safety on the Farm Sangamon Co. https://webs.extension.uiuc.edu/registration/?registrationid=7394 April 8 29, 2013 Good Agricultural Practices Webinars Kankakee County - 6-8pm attend from home https://webs.extension.uiuc.edu/registration/?registrationid=6085 6