University of Missouri Extension, Commercial Agriculture Beef Focus Team

Similar documents
Instructions for Using Stocker/Feeder Cattle Spreadsheet Tools

User Manual: Stocker, Feeder Retained Ownership Profit Projection

Replacement Heifers Costs and Return Calculation Decision Aids

Grassfed Beef Production Profit Projection and Closeout

Pre-conditioning of Feeder Calves: A Kentucky CPH-45 Case Study

User Manual - Custom Finish Cattle Profit Projection

Sell or Keep to Upgrading Cull Cows Profit Projection

Determining Your Unit Costs of Producing A Hundred Weight of Calf

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Grassing Costs. in Manitoba

2018 UW Extension Cattle Feeders Workshops UW Extension Beef Decision Making Tools

Update on Preconditioning Beef Calves Prior to Sale by Cow Calf Producers. Objectives of a Preconditioning Program. Vac-45 Calves

Ranch to Rail Summary Report

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond: A Comparative Analysis Of ND - Demo Cow Herd To North Dakota Database

Evaluating Preconditioning Profitability - Projection and Closeout Manual

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond A Comparative Analysis Of Demo Herd 1997 Herd To McKenzie County Database

Performance of SE Cattle When Placed on Feed. Gary D. Fike Beef Cattle Specialist Certified Angus Beef LLC Manhattan, KS

Ranch Calculator (RanchCalc)

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

A Profile of Cattle Feeding: Beyond the Averages

TOC. INDEX Control and Prevention of Diseases of Feedlot Cattle. O. M. Radostits. Take Home Message. Cattle Purchase and Introduction to a Feedlot

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

extension economics report

Marketing Cull Cows How & When?

BEEF COW/CALF ENTERPRISE BUDGET 2016 Estimated Costs and Returns - San Luis Valley

OPERATING INPUTS Unit Price Quantity Total $/Head. Grain Head $ - 1 $ - $ - Other Feed Additives Head $ - 1 $ - $ -

Slope Farms. Our farm. Our work with other farmers. Experience with leasing land. Models for seasonal grazing

The Value of Trace-ability

Benchmarking Your Herd s Economic Facts

ECONOMICS OF ADDED GAIN

Dairy Replacement Programs: Costs & Analysis 3 rd Quarter 2012

PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF CATTLE, DAIRY PRODUCTION, SWINE PRODUCTION AND FORAGE CROPS IN LOUISIANA, 1997

Texas A&M Ranch to Rail - North/South Summary Report

The Changing Impact of Economics on Managing Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex in Feedlot Cattle

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

Value of Preconditioned Certified Health Programs to Feedlots

Northern beef case study

4-H Livestock Project Book 20

Texas A&M Ranch to Rail - North/South Summary Report. Performance Information

Cattle Feeder's Planning Guide

EFFECTS OF LIMIT FEEDING ON FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS

2012 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Utah State University Ranch to Rail Summary Report

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profit Cow-Calf Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Cow-Calf Enterprise

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profit Cow-Calf Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Cow-Calf Enterprise

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

Factors Affecting Lot Low Choice and Above and Lot Premium Choice Acceptance Rate of Beef Calves in the Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity Program

Understanding SHRINK in Beef Cattle

Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007

Ranching 101: Ranch Record Keeping. Terrell Miller

Cow-Calf Ranch Input Worksheet- Unit Cost of Production Workshop Users Guide

SAMPLE COSTS FOR BEEF CATTLE YEARLING/STOCKER PRODUCTION 300 Head

3. Total revenue 80,605 1,622

Beef Cattle Profitability Expectations for Kenny Burdine UK Agricultural Economics

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

What Value Looks Like to a Feedyard. By Tom Brink

Amazing times For years. Using the Missouri Recipe for Hitting the Quality Target. Today. Amazing times For years

Guidelines For Estimating Cost of Raising Dairy Steers For Weight Range of lbs Based on marketing 100 head per year

Retained Ownership In Cattle Cycles

Improving the Value of Your Calf Crop

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

The Value of Preconditioning Programs in Beef Production Systems. D.L. Roeber and W.J. Umberger 1

Improving the Value of Your Calf Crop

Seasonal Trends in Steer Feeding Profits, Prices, and Performance

Cash Flow and Enterprise Information - step two for your 2016 farm analysis

A Seven Year Summary of Feeding Cull Market Cows

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profit Cow-Calf Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Cow-Calf Enterprise

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

Which dog do you want to be?

WHETHER dealing with a commercial

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle December 2 and 3, 2008, Fort Collins, CO

The Big Picture: Road ahead for the cattle business

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

Focus. Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

Focus. Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

Backgrounding Calves Part 1: Assessing the Opportunity

Performance and Economic Analysis of Calf-Fed and Yearling Systems for Fall-Born Calves

Opportunities exist to increase revenue from cull cows through changes in marketing strategies. This figure shows that cull cow prices tend to bottom

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado

Central Texas Cow/Calf Clinic

Background and Assumptions

Fed Cattle Pricing. This NebGuide discusses pricing alternatives for fed cattle, including live weight, dressed weight and grid pricing.

Value-Based Marketing for Feeder Cattle. By Tom Brink, Top Dollar Angus, Inc.

Beef Tips and Cow Chips

June Area: Sections G K

Jane Parish Extension Beef Cattle Specialist, Mississippi State University

Britt Hicks, Ph.D., PAS Area Extension Livestock Specialist. September 2011

Georgia Beef Challenge Rules and Entry Form Ugabeef.com

Beef & Cattle Market Outlook. Glynn Tonsor Dept. of Agricultural Economics Kansas State University

UW-Extension Feeder Cattle Workshops Evaluation Report, Ashley Julka Shelly Hadley David Trechter

Integration of Pasturing Systems for Cattle Finishing Programs

HOW HAVE WE PROGRESSED

THE EFFECTS OF GRAZING SYSTEM AND EARLY WEANING ON PRODUCTIVITY OF FALL CALVING COWS IN OKLAHOMA

COW/CALF DAYS 2015 NICOLE KENNEY-RAMBO

Beef and Dairy Market Outlook

Marketing Options to Improve Income. Ken Kelley Auburn University

Economics 230 Lab 4 Section 1 2 Due September 24 Fall 2010 WHOLE FARM BUDGET

Effects of Feeding Whole Cottonseed on Calf Performance During Preconditioning

Ranching 101: Ranch Record Keeping. Cattle Identification. Terrell Miller About CattleMax

HOW DO I PROFIT FROM REPRODUCTION? HITTING THE TARGET FOR HIGH-QUALITY PRODUCT. L.R. Corah. Certified Angus Beef LLC Manhattan, KS.

Transcription:

Instructions for Using Stocker/Feeder Cattle Spreadsheet Tools University of Missouri Extension, Commercial Agriculture Beef Focus Team Evaluation of Retained Ownership vs. Sell at Weaning This spreadsheet was written in Microsoft Excel 1. Conversion to other spreadsheet programs is not guaranteed. You will be asked if you want to enable macros in the spreadsheet. Click on the Enable Macros button. The file has been scanned for viruses and is considered safe as it leaves my office. The starting point for this spreadsheet is the upper left corner (A1) of the RO vs. sell at weaning page. If you are not at this location as the file is brought up, press <Control><Home>, or use the scroll bars to go to that location. Many of the calculations for this spreadsheet are done on the Sheet 1 page. This page is available for you to look at and to examine the equations used, however you don t need to enter any information on the page and it is locked. If the page is too small or too large for your screen, you can change the magnification by going to the View menu and selecting Zoom and then changing the setting. Depending on what you want to calculate, select (left click) one of the two buttons: Return to Ownership and Management or Sale Price to Attain Given Return. As with any spreadsheet tool the answers generated are only as accurate as the accuracy of the inputs. Although the mathematical calculations were evaluated by a number of specialists and were tested on thousands of test examples, no warrantee is expressed or implied about the accuracy of the spreadsheet. PLEASE USE THE SPREADSHEET AT YOUR OWN RISK. To Calculate Return to Ownership and Management You will be asked to fill in several variables concerning the retained ownership vs. sell at weaning situation you are evaluating, all variables are on a per head basis (not the entire group). The return to ownership and management at the end of the report is difference in returns if the calves are retained past weaning versus sold at weaning (not the return to ownership from birth to sale). If the number is negative, the economic advantage is for selling at weaning. If the number is positive, the economic advantage is for retaining ownership past weaning. Variable Weaning weight (Lbs.) Description Use the most accurate weights you have available for the time you would sell the cattle if you did not retain ownership significantly past weaning. 1 Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, Washington

Percent shrink prior to marketing Sale fees if sold at weaning Trucking fee if sold at weaning Assumed price received if sold at weaning Hired labor cost per head ($) Annual interest rate (i.e. 10) If you are using on-farm weaning weights, estimate the amount of shrink between on-farm weights and saleweights. If you are using previous years sale weights at weaning for the entry above, enter zero as the percent shrink. All commission fees, beef industry council fees, etc. incurred at the time of selling at weaning. Trucking fees that you would pay or that you would charge against your own truck for transport from your farm to the livestock market. The prorated average price for all calves sold at weaning. Use projected local market prices on the date you would normally sell to determine price for different descriptions of cattle: heifers, steers, light calves, fleshy calves, non-conforming calves etc. Caution: Do not be tempted to use the projected high price and apply it to all of your calves. Remember that most likely, your calves will be sold in several groups, with each group receiving a different price. To accurately estimate the weaning value of your calves, those different prices should be prorated over the percentage of calves that fall into each price category. This is not where you pay yourself. This line is for any hired labor used to care for the cattle or facilities. One way to calculate the entry is to take the entire payroll and divide by the number of cattle fed per year. Another option is to charge the labor in the feedmill to the feed charge, the processing crew labor to the processing charge, the hospital crew labor to the treatment cost, etc. (in which case the hired labor cost per head is decreased or zero). The entry should be a number greater than 1 if the interest rate is 10%, enter the number as 10, not 0.10. The entry is the interest rate of borrowed money or if no borrowed money is used, the entry is the interest rate or return of an alternate investment.

Price paid per pound of diet, as fed ($) Days owned past weaning Yardage / Rent per day ($) Cost for processing products ($ for vaccines, implants, dewormers, tags) Morbidity Rate (%) Cost of treatment ($; entire cost of multiple-day treatment) Re-pull rate (%) Cost of re-pull treatment ($) Price is reported on an as-fed (rather than dry-matter) basis. Since more than one diet are fed and the costs of different diet vary, the entry should be the prorated cost of the diets. Feed storage and mixing loss should be included in the diet price. The number of days between selling at or near weaning and the anticipated sale date. Yardage or pasture rent being charged per day. If kept on your own land, either enter an appropriate yardage fee or if zero is entered, return to management should be evaluated with that in mind. Your cost for the products used at processing, including the cost of administration equipment (syringes, needles, implant guns, etc.). Processing labor may or may not be included in this value (see Hired Labor Cost per Head) The number of cattle treated for any reason (or that died without being treated) divided by the number of cattle originally in the group. If the morbidity rate is 20%, enter the number as 20, not 0.20. The average cost of antimicrobial or other drugs given to treat sick cattle plus the cost of administration equipment (syringes, needles, etc.) and any chute charges or other applicable fees. Repeat treatment rate and charges are included in this entry. Hospital labor may or may not be included in this value (see Hired Labor Cost per Head). The number of cattle that are treated more than once (after they are considered cured) during the confinement period divided by the number of all cattle treated during the confinement period (i.e. if 20 calves in a pen of 100 are treated for disease and then 4 of those calves are treated for the same disease 2 weeks later, the re-pull rate is 4 20 = 20% (enter as 20, not 0.20). Many times the drugs used to treat calves pulled from the pen a second (or more) time are different than the initial treatment, therefore the cost is likely to be different. The same guidelines are followed as with Cost of Treatment.

Mortality rate (%) Chronic rate (%) Unshrunk sale weight (Lbs.) Percent shrink (%) Sales or commission fees ($) Return to ownership and management ($) Trucking fees departure ($) Decreased return for chronics (compared to pen average) The number of cattle that die during the confinement period divided by the number in the group at the start of the evaluation period. If the mortality rate is 1%, enter the number as 1, not 0.01. A chronic is defined as an animal that has respiratory or other disease and that does not completely recover, nor does it die. The percentage of chronics is often assumed to be equal to the mortality rate for a farm, feedlot, or group of cattle. If your records indicate a rate different than the mortality rate, use the most appropriate number. The average weight at sale (of animals sold) prior to a pencil shrink being applied. The shrink applied to the weight at sale to yield the payweight. The entry should be a number greater than 1 if the pencil shrink is 4%, enter the number as 4, not 0.04. All sales or commission fees prorated on a per-head basis, including beef industry council check-off, brokers commissions, livestock market commissions, etc. The dollar amount you as the owner of the cattle want for your management expertise, risk assumption, and return on investment. If you are paying trucking fees as the cattle leave your farm, enter the per-head charge. The economic loss of chronics is greater than the treatment costs alone. This loss is due to slow and inefficient weight gain, and the fact that chronics are usually marketed at a lighter weight (less value) and with a lower value carcass. One researcher reports about a $150 dollar decreased value for chronic animals compared to their pen-mates. Use a value that your records indicate is reasonable.

The bottom portion of the report page gives results calculated from the entered variables. Other output is found on the Sheet 1 page, but the figures reported on the report page are considered to be the most valuable for the situation you are evaluating. Result Cost of interest Shrunk sale weight if sold at weaning Income if sold at weaning Average Daily Gain - (Pay Weight - Deads Out) Average Daily Gain (Pay Weight - Deads Accounted For) Shrunk sale weight after retained ownership phase Total Pounds of Feed, as fed Description The amount spent on interest (or opportunity from alternate investments) for the evaluated situation. This output was calculated by charging interest for the entire period (days owned) for those expenditures incurred at the start of the feeding period (i.e. price paid, arrival trucking, and processing cost) and for one-half of the days owned for those expenditures incurred throughout the confinement and grazing periods (i.e. feed, yardage, rent, treatment, re-pull treatment, and labor costs). This calculated value indicates what the sale weight would have been if the calves had been sold at or near weaning. This would be the check you receive if you sell your calves at or near weaning. It is the price paid for the sale weight, with commission, sale, and trucking fees subtracted. The gain from purchase weight to shrunk sale weight (pay weight to pay weight) divided by the days owned using the average weights of all the animals sold subtracted from all the purchased (i.e. dead animals were not counted in the animals sold). Differs from the Deads Out calculation in that the total pounds of cattle sold are divided by the number of animals purchased (vs. divided by the number of animals sold) to determine average sale weight. This calculated value indicates the sale weight of the calves after a retained ownership period. The amount of feed consumed by the group including the feed consumed by animals that died and were not sold. The equation assumes that deaths occurred halfway through the retained ownership period.

Feed Efficiency (Lbs. of feed / 1 Lbs. of gain Deads Accounted For) Cost of Gain (w/o Return to Mgmt. Deads Accounted For) Return to Ownership and Management The total pounds of feed (as fed) fed during the retained ownership period divided by the average pounds of gain (shrunk weaning weight to pay-weight change in pounds divided by the number of animals purchased). All of the costs, except purchase cost and return to management, divided by the average pounds of gain (shrunk weaning weight to pay-weight change in pounds divided by the number of animals purchased). The dollars returned to pay ownership To Calculate Sale Price to Attain A Given Return This set of calculations is designed to determine the sale price for cattle with a given expected performance (health, growth, sale value) that will yield a given return. By using several production scenarios (expected case, best case, worst case), a confidence range can be produced for sale price. Variable Weaning weight (Lbs.) Percent shrink prior to marketing Sale fees if sold at weaning Trucking fee if sold at weaning Description Use the most accurate weights you have available for the time you would sell the cattle if you did not retain ownership significantly past weaning. If you are using on-farm weaning weights, estimate the amount of shrink between on-farm weights and saleweights. If you are using previous years sale weights at weaning for the entry above, enter zero as the percent shrink. All commission fees, beef industry council fees, etc. incurred at the time of selling at weaning. Trucking fees that you would pay or that you would charge against your own truck for transport from your farm to the livestock market.

Assumed price received if sold at weaning Hired labor cost per head ($) Annual interest rate (i.e. 10) Price paid per pound of diet, as fed ($) Days owned past weaning Yardage / Rent per day ($) The prorated average price for all calves sold at weaning. Use projected local market prices on the date you would normally sell to determine price for different descriptions of cattle: heifers, steers, light calves, fleshy calves, non-conforming calves etc. Caution: Do not be tempted to use the projected high price and apply it to all of your calves. Remember that most likely, your calves will be sold in several groups, with each group receiving a different price. To accurately estimate the weaning value of your calves, those different prices should be prorated over the percentage of calves that fall into each price category. This is not where you pay yourself. This line is for any hired labor used to care for the cattle or facilities. One way to calculate the entry is to take the entire payroll and divide by the number of cattle fed per year. Another option is to charge the labor in the feedmill to the feed charge, the processing crew labor to the processing charge, the hospital crew labor to the treatment cost, etc. (in which case the hired labor cost per head is decreased or zero). The entry should be a number greater than 1 if the interest rate is 10%, enter the number as 10, not 0.10. The entry is the interest rate of borrowed money or if no borrowed money is used, the entry is the interest rate or return of an alternate investment. Price is reported on an as-fed (rather than dry-matter) basis. Since more than one diet are fed and the costs of different diet vary, the entry should be the prorated cost of the diets. Feed storage and mixing loss should be included in the diet price. The number of days between selling at or near weaning and the anticipated sale date. Yardage or pasture rent being charged per day. If kept on your own land, either enter an appropriate yardage fee or if zero is entered, return to management should be evaluated with that in mind.

Cost for processing products ($ for vaccines, implants, dewormers, tags) Morbidity Rate (%) Cost of treatment ($; entire cost of multiple-day treatment) Re-pull rate (%) Cost of re-pull treatment ($) Mortality rate (%) Chronic rate (%) Your cost for the products used at processing, including the cost of administration equipment (syringes, needles, implant guns, etc.). Processing labor may or may not be included in this value (see Hired Labor Cost per Head) The number of cattle treated for any reason (or that died without being treated) divided by the number of cattle originally in the group. If the morbidity rate is 20%, enter the number as 20, not 0.20. The average cost of antimicrobial or other drugs given to treat sick cattle plus the cost of administration equipment (syringes, needles, etc.) and any chute charges or other applicable fees. Repeat treatment rate and charges are included in this entry. Hospital labor may or may not be included in this value (see Hired Labor Cost per Head). The number of cattle that are treated more than once (after they are considered cured) during the confinement period divided by the number of all cattle treated during the confinement period (i.e. if 20 calves in a pen of 100 are treated for disease and then 4 of those calves are treated for the same disease 2 weeks later, the re-pull rate is 4 20 = 20% (enter as 20, not 0.20). Many times the drugs used to treat calves pulled from the pen a second (or more) time are different than the initial treatment, therefore the cost is likely to be different. The same guidelines are followed as with Cost of Treatment. The number of cattle that die during the confinement period divided by the number in the group at the start of the evaluation period. If the mortality rate is 1%, enter the number as 1, not 0.01. A chronic is defined as an animal that has respiratory or other disease and that does not completely recover, nor does it die. The percentage of chronics is often assumed to be equal to the mortality rate for a farm, feedlot, or group of cattle. If your records indicate a rate different than the mortality rate, use the most appropriate number.

Price received at sale ($/Lbs.) Unshrunk sale weight (Lbs.) Percent shrink (%) Sales or commission fees ($) Trucking fees departure ($) Decreased return for chronics (compared to pen average) The sale price expressed on a per-pound basis. Four decimal places are available so that cattle that are sold at $70.75/cwt are entered as $0.7075 The average weight at sale (of animals sold) prior to a pencil shrink being applied. The shrink applied to the weight at sale to yield the payweight. The entry should be a number greater than 1 if the pencil shrink is 4%, enter the number as 4, not 0.04. All sales or commission fees prorated on a per-head basis, including beef industry council check-off, brokers commissions, livestock market commissions, etc. If you are paying trucking fees as the cattle leave your farm, enter the per-head charge. The economic loss of chronics is greater than the treatment costs alone. This loss is due to slow and inefficient weight gain, and the fact that chronics are usually marketed at a lighter weight (less value) and with a lower value carcass. One researcher reports about a $150 dollar decreased value for chronic animals compared to their pen-mates. Use a value that your records indicate is reasonable. The bottom portion of the report page gives results calculated from the entered variables. Other output is found on the Sheet 1 page, but the figures reported on the report page are considered to be the most valuable for the situation you are evaluating. Result Cost of interest Description The amount spent on interest (or opportunity from alternate investments) for the evaluated situation. This output was calculated by charging interest for the entire period (days owned) for those expenditures incurred at the start of the feeding period (i.e. price paid, arrival trucking, and processing cost) and for one-half of the days owned for those expenditures incurred throughout the confinement and grazing periods (i.e. feed, yardage, rent, treatment, re-pull treatment, and labor costs).

Shrunk sale weight if sold at weaning Income if sold at weaning Average Daily Gain - (Pay Weight - Deads Out) Average Daily Gain (Pay Weight - Deads Accounted For) Shrunk sale weight after retained ownership phase Total Pounds of Feed, as fed Feed Efficiency (Lbs. of feed / 1 Lbs. of gain Deads Accounted For) Cost of Gain (w/o Return to Mgmt. Deads Accounted For) Sale Price to Attain Given Return This calculated value indicates what the sale weight would have been if the calves had been sold at or near weaning. This would be the check you receive if you sell your calves at or near weaning. It is the price paid for the sale weight, with commission, sale, and trucking fees subtracted. The gain from purchase weight to shrunk sale weight (pay weight to pay weight) divided by the days owned using the average weights of all the animals sold subtracted from all the purchased (i.e. dead animals were not counted in the animals sold). Differs from the Deads Out calculation in that the total pounds of cattle sold are divided by the number of animals purchased (vs. divided by the number of animals sold) to determine average sale weight. This calculated value indicates the sale weight of the calves after a retained ownership period. The amount of feed consumed by the group including the feed consumed by animals that died and were not sold. The equation assumes that deaths occurred halfway through the retained ownership period. The total pounds of feed (as fed) fed during the retained ownership period divided by the average pounds of gain (shrunk weaning weight to pay-weight change in pounds divided by the number of animals purchased). All of the costs, except purchase cost and return to management, divided by the average pounds of gain (shrunk weaning weight to pay-weight change in pounds divided by the number of animals purchased). The sale price needed to return the entered Return to ownership and management if the cattle perform as expected.