An introduction to Article 43

Similar documents
Austria: Experiences with the Zonal evaluation procedure Applying Regulation (EC) No.1107/2009

Implementation of Regulation 1107/2009, current issues and future challenges

AT Experiences with the Zonal Evaluation Process (2)

Hungarian experiences Tőkés Gábor NÉBIH NTAI

The Application of Regulation EC 1107/2009 in Austria

Zonal Authorisation Projects in Austria

The most important items in the new EU pesticide Regulation

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Technical guidelines on the presentation and evaluation of plant protection product dossiers in the format of a (draft) Registration Report

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON WORK-SHARING IN THE NORTHERN ZONE IN THE AUTHORISA- TION OF PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS

Management of MRL applications submitted for active substances under Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and

Workshop Assessment of Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic (PBT) substances in different EU legislations

The new Biocidal Products Regulation. Outline and key elements

1. Status and discussions on CRD Guidance on physical, chemical and technical properties of PPPs

SVHC Authorisation and Restrictions

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Safety of the food chain Chemicals, contaminants, pesticides

Endocrine discuptors under REACH

Authorisation procedure for plant protection products. Description of the procedure for applications for zonal authorisations in Germany

OPEN QUESTIONS in the new system (1107/2009 EC)

Update from the Commission: latest developments in the biocides field

How to address chemicals of concern: roadmap 2020

Phasing-in EU procedures: MRP and referrals September 23, 2003

What s cooking in the EFSA GMO Unit? Ad hoc meeting with GMO industry representatives Parma, Italy 24 & 25 October 2018

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Safety of the food chain Chemicals, contaminants, pesticides

PAN Europe has analysed the report and presents the following comments.

10041/16 ADD 1 GSC/lt 1 DG B 2B

Update from the Commission: latest developments in the biocides field

CMDh Best Practice Guide on the processing of renewals in the Mutual Recognition and Decentralised Procedures

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) GUIDELINE ON REQUIREMENTS FOR VACCINE ANTIGEN MASTER FILE (VAMF) CERTIFICATION

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON MRP & DCP AND EU ENLARGEMENT

Public notification of all new registration applications

BPR update: Union Authorisation, Families and Same Biocidal Product

What is an ideal PSUR? A new focus based on aligned expectations

Implementing Regulation 1107/2009 Stage of Progress An Industry Perspective CEUREG Forum, Brno, 7 October 2010

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 22 JUNE 2016

Veterinary Pharmaceutical Registration in the EU

Implementation of toxicological data from other legal provisions (e.g. REACH) An industry perspective

REGISTRATION REPORT Part A Risk Management. Product code: Product name(s): ACTIOL. Southern Zone Zonal Rapporteur Member State: France

TECHNICAL REPORT OF EFSA

EU Legal framework for Pesticides and Residues

(Acts whose publication is obligatory) DIRECTIVE 98/8/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 16 February 1998

Produced by the VMD & HPRA. Revised 9th January 2015

Procedure management of variations

Workshop Efficacy Requirements and Evaluation of Plant Protection Products based on Low-Risk Active Substances, Ede (NL), /07

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY COMMISSION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT 1

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT. Information note

EU Regulation on the making available and use of biocidal products (BPR)

Implementing REACH - Safer chemicals in Europe

Authorisation of ATMPs in EU: routes to facilitate prompt availability for patients.

14226/18 VK/el 1 TREE.2.A

DOSE EXPRESSION FOR VERTICAL CROPS IN BELGIUM PLANT PROTECTION. Guidance document

Update from ECHA. REACH Information and Experience Exchange Forum (RIEF IV) CEFIC 19 June 2015 Sheraton Brussels Airport Hotel

Guidance on requirements for efficacy data for zonal evaluation of a plant protection product in the Northern Zone

Marketing Authorisation Routes in the EU

EPPO Workshop on Comparative Assessment in the framework of substitution Brussels, /07

The new EU Variations Legislation Industry Perspective

FINAL DRAFT REACH: STATUS, CHALLENGES AND CURRENT WORK. ETRMA CRIA meeting Tyre Industry Regulatory Dialogue

Revision of the Variations Regulation. Key Principles and Guidelines Development CONTENT

Guidelines. of

NO DATA, NO MARKET? REACH Compliance A workshop on data quality in registration Dossiers August 2018, Berlin. Dolores Romano

Feedback from ECHA on dossier and substance evaluation

EUROPEAN COMMISSION TO THE PRESIDENT AND MEMBERS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS

ICH Q3D. Questions & Answers Q1: Q2: U n d e r s ta n d i n g the Risk Assessment Requirements. Knowing the Options

Official Journal C 223. of the European Union. Information and Notices. Information. Volume 56 2 August English edition

Current activities of the European Commission in the area of pesticide residues

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL ENVIRONMENT Directorate A Green economy ENV.A.3 - Chemicals

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 16 June /09 Interinstitutional File: 2009/0076 (COD) ENV 440 MI 246 AGRI 267 CHIMIE 50 CODEC 849

How to prepare an application for revision of a CEP

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON THE PAEDIATRIC REGULATION (REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL (EC) No 1901/2006, AS AMENDED)

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON THE NON-CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OF FIXED COMBINATIONS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Glyphosate in the EU

Guidance on the application of mutual recognition in Norway

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS ON SUBMISSIONS of PSURs UNDER THE EU PSUR WORK SHARING SCHEME. Version 10 November 2009

Act on the Government Offices of Iceland 1)

FEASIBILITY OF A MATERIALS INFORMATION PLATFORM AND THE WAY FORWARD

Technical Guidance Paper drr - Part B Section 7 - Efficacy. Versie 1. (2015)

Progress Report on the Implementation of PPPs Regulations in Republic of Croatia CEUREG FORUM XVIII MEETING

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

Authorisation in REACH

ANNEXES. to the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Q/A-LIST FOR THE SUBMISSION OF VARIATIONS ACCORDING TO COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) 1234/2008

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT AND SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS IN SPAIN

Efficacy requirements for the

VM-ID: MU101_20_001e_WL - Wegleitung_HD - Hilfsdokument / V3.0 / dst / er / / 6

ECHA policy for prevention of conflicts of interest

June, 2011 Guidance on requirements for efficacy data for zonal evaluation of a plant protection product in the Northern Zone

(Text with EEA relevance)

Importance of minor uses for the chemical industry and initiatives

Authorisation applications : process, learning lessons and suggestions. Aggie Kötze (REACH Manager, ILA))

Draft document circulated to Committees drafting group members 20 October Committees consultation November Adoption January 2015

Guideline on the processing of renewals in the centralised procedure

Guideline on the processing of renewals in the centralised procedure

Implementation of REACH and CLP: Overview, Status and post 2018 possible actions

Archivio Europeo delle miscele pericolose: aggiornamenti ed operatività

This tender material elaborates the tender advertisement published at cf. annex 1.

Re : EC Consultation Paper Revision of the variations regulations

REGULATORY ACTIONS UNDER REACH & CLP FEEDBACK FROM ECHA S RAC

Public Consultation in relation to the REACH REFIT evaluation

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL MINUTES OF THE FERTILISER WORKING GROUP MEETING. 17 March 2014

Transcription:

Health and Safety Executive An introduction to Article 43 Jon Winfield Head of Chemistry Chemicals Regulation Division Health & Safety Executive 10 October 2016

What Article 43 says: Applicants must: Submit product renewal application within 3 months of a.s. renewal Address new data requirements & criteria Provide evidence that new data are necessary Provide info to show product complies with a.s. renewal regulation

What Article 43 says: MSs must: Work zonally Check compliance with approval conditions Decide on renewal within 12 months of renewal of approval If decision delayed can extend existing authorisations

Why only 3 months? Products already authorised to UPs Only need to address changes resulting from the renewal of the active substance however EFSA now peer reviewing active substances New risk assessment guidance in several areas New data requirements will apply

Re-registration Vs Renewal Re-registration 91/414 Directive no detailed rules 2 years for submission 2 years for evaluation New assessments to UPs Re-registration with last active inclusion Vs Renewal 1107/2009 Regulation timelines apply directly 3 months submission 9 months for decisions Updated assessments Renewal with every approval

0 months 3 months 4 months 8 months 9 months 12 months Product Renewal Timeline (after a.s. approval) Date of Application (DoA) Renewal application received Notify cms compliance check outcome MSs asked to comment zrms completes renewal report zrms & cms renewal authorisation issued zrms Ensures product: Access to a.s. data Complies with Regulation Any delayed submission valid zrms evaluation: all uses in zone (may inc Art 51) Using guidance in place at application date 3 weeks + 1 week for zrms to respond cms to consider: National Specifics Comparative Assessment (if CfS)

List of Changed Endpoints EFSA will highlight where endpoints have changed in the LOEP for AIR 3 actives. A.S. RMS will do this work for upcoming AIR 2 actives. Available via public area of CIRCABC (or direct from RMS).

List of Studies Relied upon for Active Substance Renewal Active Substance RMS should ensure that this is completed and available by the time the EFSA conclusion is published. Available publically via CIRCABC & direct from zrms. Delays in availability of this document create huge difficulty for off-patent (generic) manufacturers.

Noting at Standing Committee Renewal regulation sets DoA and the new active expiry date Renewal date will be set ASAP after voting (in line with Art 17) MS will (where necessary) adjust product expiry dates RMS should ensure list of critical data is available

Pre-submission meetings Not essential (in UK) but encouraged if CAT 4 proposed (discussed in next slide) Can discuss a portfolio of products in same meeting Useful to help plan strategy Agenda determined by applicant 5,200 fee, applicant to take minutes/notes

Category 4 Delayed Renewal Data necessary due to new endpoints, but insufficient time, from EFSA conclusion, to produce new study. Applicant must justify why CAT 4 applies If zrms agrees: Sets submission date (3 months after final study complete) Notifies cms to extend authorisations No agreed upper limit on delay a 2 year delayed submission is acceptable if it can be justified Can be problems if >1 zrmss with different opinions

Assessment report - drr GD requires - A complete drr in which changes to risk assessment are highlighted. AIM: A stand alone document must be supplied by the applicant showing how the product is supported in all areas (i.e. complete RR which could be used for MR) BUT only need new assessment where data requirements, endpoints or guidance changed. Where previous assessment remains valid, we include previous MS assessment in drr (identify MS & date)

Assessment Report - drr (2) Expectation formulation studies remain valid (e.g. Phys chem props/ tox / ecotox). Sections may need updating for new relevant impurities / CLP Methods New studies may necessitate new methods assessments (e.g. if new relevant impurity) If no GAP change minimal efficacy (no substantive changes to efficacy data requirements Unless there is a change in GAP will only need to update resistance section)

drr (3) - Mixed a.s. products Application required after each a.s. renewal but dossier submission can be delayed if renewal dates <12m apart at any point. drr should present assessment relating to the active(s) which has triggered renewal If drr delayed as expiry dates <12 months apart; - Use guidance in place at 2 nd a.s. submission applies - Combined toxicity is not yet harmonised. Combined assessment must be presented at each submission but it s up to the zrms whether or not to assess. In the UK we will only consider at the renewal of last active in the product.

Submitting to UK At 3 month deadline submit for every compliant* product: Letter / overview Copy of authorisation, application form (CRD-R) Demonstration of active substance data access Declaration that product & source(s)* comply with restrictions / conditions in renewal regulation (in CRD-R) List of all uses supported in the zone (ideally including article 51 minor uses to be supported) *In principle non compliant uses cannot be renewed (The UK is permitting some flexibility here). If a new technical equivalence assessment required this must be submitted under a separate application.

Submitting to UK (2) Statement that GAP in each MS is unchanged from previously authorised. New data (plus Cat 4 justification where relevant). Evidence/justification that new data provided (or to be submitted if Cat 4 applies) are necessary. Unless delayed submission is justified, also need:: Complete drr highlighting new data & risk assessments. (Including updated assessment of UK national requirements) draft label If the product contains a Candidate for Substitution, a comparative assessment must be supplied.

zrms/ cms overview zrms, ideally within 1 month: Check active data access (main check done by a.s. RMS) Check compliance (product & uses) with renewal regulation Consider CAT 4 justifications (liaise where >1 zrms for a.s.) Agree (or not) authorisation extensions & advise cmss

zrms/ cms overview zrms, within 6 months (if not delayed renewal) Conduct risk assessment. No possibility to stop the clock so very limited in terms of accepting additional information. In principle requests for minor clarification are permissible but there should be no new data. Circulate for commenting (3 weeks). Issue national authorisation. Advise cms of outcome and provide final Reg Report. cms, within 3 months of zrms conclusion: should recognise zrms conclusions, consider national specifics, issue national authorisation.

Summary UK planning workload as best we can Submission required 3 months after every active re-approval, for each active in a product Delayed renewal may be justified UK aiming to streamline internal process and focus on essential only Questions remain: UK working with other MS and COM to resolve

Health and Safety Executive AIR 2 Progress Distribution of renewal in CZ Many MSs already at capacity In theory renewal could require 40% increase in workload.

Health and Safety Executive Application types received so far (UK) Broadly as predicted Cat 4 delay significantly more resource intensive

Health and Safety Executive CZ First Tranche Progress By now zrms assessment of first tranche should be complete Data is >2 weeks old but MSs are struggling to meet timelines

Conclusions What was originally envisaged to be a simple job now more complex Timelines set out in Regulation difficult now for some products given changes Legislative requirements only in Regulation Guidance developed to flesh out the detail of the procedures

Jon Winfield Head of Human Heath Chemicals Regulation Division Health & Safety Executive Thank you Any Questions?