Design for environment applied to rice production

Similar documents
Design for environment applied to rice production

Main results of the CARBON. CARE project in the Province of Ferrara Emilia Romagna Region

I m Green PE Life Cycle Assessment

I m green PE Life Cycle Assessment

Life cycle analysis of pistachio production in Greece

The Low Carbon Diet: Reducing Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Food System Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach

RENEWABLE RAW MATERIAL

Life Cycle Management of Bioplastics for a Sustainable Future in Thailand: Sa-med Island Model

Product Category Rules (PCR) (Approved PCR ID: PA-AA-01)

Current status on LCA as applied to the organic food chains

i-report tool prepared by:

Jacopo Bacenetti, Marco Negri, Marco Fiala, Stefano Bocchi

Life Cycle Assessment of the treatment of MSW in the average European Waste-to-Energy plant

Comparison between conventional and organic rice production systems in Northern Italy

Sustainability of sugar cane bioethanol: Energy balance and GHG

Life Cycle Energy and Carbon Footprint in Midwest Dairies

WHAT IS THE BEST USE OF SUGAR CROPS? ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF TWO APPLICATIONS: BIOFUELS VS. BIOPRODUCTS

BIOFOM THE ZERO SUGARCANE MILL:

A LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT-BASED COMPARISON OF ENGINEERING THERMOSET AND ALUMINUM IN AN AUTOMOTIVE UNDER-THE-HOOD APPLICATION

Definitions and Comments on 2016 Consolidated Nestlé Environmental Performance Indicators

Environmental and economic performance of paddy rice and upland crop rotation in Japan: a comparison between organic and conventional systems

Environmental assessment of N fertilizer management practices

LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM IRRIGATED MAIZE: THE LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS

Training Course. Thurs. 1 st September 2011, Berlin. Seminaris Campus Hotel Berlin

Life cycle assessment of non-edible oil crops (Crambe abyssinica) production

Sugarcane Polyolefins Adding value through the use of I m green Polyethylene. May 2014

Estimating the Overall Impact of A Change In Agricultural Practices on Atmospheric CO 2

Life cycle GHG emissions in the EU biofuels legislation Luisa Marelli and Robert Edwards

Definitions and Comments on 2012 Consolidated Nestlé Environmental Performance Indicators

Assessing the Environmental Performance of Integrated Ethanol and Biogas Production

Sustainability of biofuels: GHG emissions

Ethanol Fuels: E10 or E85 Life Cycle Perspectives

III Low Carbon Scenario for LULUCF. Brazil GHG Emissions Profile

Lignocellulosic conversion to ethanol: the environmental life cycle impacts

ArcelorMittal Construction Mineral wool sandwich panels

An evaluation of introducing the OBEO caddy into the food waste disposal system in Ireland

Global warming potential of Swiss arable and forage production systems

Critical review of allocation rules the case of Finnish rainbow trout

Report on Projections of GHG Emissions up to 2020

Environmental Product Declaration

DATA LIFE CYCLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Nickel

Greening Agri-food Value Chains in Emerging Economies

Life Cycle Assessment as a support tool for bioenergy policy. Dr. Miguel Brandão

Life Cycle Assessment of Biomass-Derived Resin for Sustainable Chemical Industry

Potentialities of organic and sustainable rice production in Japan from a life cycle perspective

Food, Fuel and Forests A Seminar on Climate Change, Agriculture and Trade. Sustainability Considerations for Ethanol. Andre M.

Product Environmental Profile

A clean energy solution from cradle to grave

Expanding System Boundaries in Attributional LCA to Assess GHG Emissions and Climate Impacts of Advanced Biofuels and Bioenergy Pathways

G R E E N H O U S E G A S M I T I G A T I O N A G R I C U L T U R E A N D F O R E S T R Y S E C T O R S

Soil Management Strategies to Mitigate Climate Change. Synergies and Tradeoffs with Water Resource Management and Energy Security

Adaptation of life cycle assessment (LCA) to agricultural production on a regional scale in Japan

A clean energy solution from cradle to grave

IPCC reports are published regularly and become a reference for the formulation of public policies and for use by experts and students.

Environmental Implications of Different Production Systems in a Sardinian Dairy Sheep Farm

Biogas from waste materials as transportation fuel benefits from an environmental point of view

Eco-efficiency assessment in the agricultural sector: The case of fresh form tomato crop in Phthiotida

Soil Food & Biofuels Is this sustainable?

KONE TravelMaster 110. Environmental product declaration

Life Cycle Assessment of Thai Shrimp

Think Blue. The up! Environmental Commendation Data Sheet

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF WASTE MANAGEMENT

The construction of the plant [120]: 1. March Fundamental construction of the main fermenter and the post fermenter

Life Cycle and GHG Analyses

What is LCA? LCA methodologies

Product Environmental Profile

The Brazilian Biofuels Experience. Flavio Castelar Executive Director APLA Brasil. GBEP Bioenergy Week Mozambique

Carbon Management 101

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Naturally-Sourced and Petroleum-Based Glycols Commonly Used in Personal Care Products

Would / Does tidal power work? How does it work? In what ways is tidal power an improvement on wind and solar power?

LCA of energy crops from the perspective of a multifunctional agriculture

Consumables of a Production Process

Life Cycle Assessment of Milled Rice Production: Case Study in Thailand

ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION In accordance with EN and ISO 14025

Methodology Internet Based Carbon Footprint Calculation Methodology

Rice chain analysis in India

Brazilian experience with biofuels. Department of Sugar Cane and Agroenergy

THE INTRODUCTION THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Brazil Institute. Sugarcane Ethanol and Land Use in Brazil. Andre M. Nassar

Methodologies: Emission and Mitigation of GHG in the production and Use of Ethanol from Sugarcane

An Overview of Aquaculture through the lens of Environmental Sustainability

Product Environmental Profile

TOOL #64. LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS

The archived presentation is available at: 1

Sugarcane Ethanol Production in Malawi A Real World Case Study on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Due to Direct and Indirect Effects

Bioenergy and Land use: Local to Global Challenges. Jeanette Whitaker Senior Scientist and NERC KE Fellow Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster

3. ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS

Environmental hot spot analysis in agricultural life-cycle assessments

U.S. Emissions

INTRODUCTION PRINTING & WRITING PAPERS LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT

THE SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS FROM CROP

The User Method Statement

Chapter 2 Allocation Issues in LCA Methodology: A Case Study of Corn Stover-Based Fuel Ethanol

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF SHEEP

Bio-ethanol CO 2 reduction For Mauritius

Product Environmental Profile

Columbus, OH April 4, 2017

BRAZILIAN SEED MARKET NEWS. By MNAGRO

Monitoring energy use on farms, measurements, bookkeeping forms, inventories. J.Ahokas

CitrusBR Carbon Footprint Study

Transcription:

Design for environment applied to rice production Leda Coltro 1*, Luiz Fernando M. Marton 2, Fábio Panciera Pilecco 2, Ademar Cadore Pilecco 2, Lucas Felini Mattei 2 1 Institute of Food Technology ITAL, Packaging Technology Center CETEA, Campinas, SP, Brazil 2 Pilecco Nobre Alimentos Ltda., Alegrete, RS, Brazil

Project End-to-End Sustainability 3rd edition - 2013 Rice (160.3 g/day) and beans (182.9 g/day) are the basis of Brazilians food consumption. That is why rice has been chosen as one of the 18 products of the project End-to-End Sustainability developed by Walmart Brasil and its main suppliers. Introduction

Project End-to-End Sustainability 3rd edition Introduction

Rice cropping fields are important contributor to climate change since they are a major methane source. The area of rice cropping fields in the world is gradually increasing and this area is expected to continue expanding as the world population increases. So, mitigating methane emission in these areas is an important issue. This can be accomplished through water management practices. In this project, Pilecco Nobre Alimentos Ltda. implemented several improvements in the rice production with the aim of reducing the environmental impact of the product with the assistance of CETEA/ITAL. Life cycle thinking was applied to the rice production system in order to evaluate of possibilities of reducing the environmental impact of the rice production Introduction

This work was conducted in accordance with the International Standard ISO/TR 14062 (2009). Taking into account the life cycle thinking, improvements have been applied to several stages of the life cycle of rice production. Life cycle stage Irrigation Drying Core and clean Packaging Transport Traditional production system (baseline) Irrigated rice cropping system Firewood furnace and temperature rate system with high grains breakage Without rice recovery Plastic packaging from nonrenewable resource Conventional diesel truck fleet New production system Underground drip irrigation rice cropping system Steam radiators and homogeneous temperature system with reduced grains breakage Rice recovery after straw removal Plastic packaging from renewable resource, sugar cane Diesel S10 and more efficient truck fleet Methods

The goal of this work was to reduce the environmental impact of rice production. Traditional rice production system was established as a baseline case against which the impacts of the conditions could be quantified. The work was carried out from June 2012 to August 2013. The new irrigation system was implemented by Pilecco Nobre Alimentos Ltda. in a cultivation area of 64 hectares, in Alegrete, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Functional unity = 1,000 kg of packed rice (5 kg packs), available at retail System boundaries Energy Production Fertilizers Production Rice Cultivation Rice Processing T Rice at retail Packaging T = Transport Methods

Farm specific data along with industrial production data have been combined in order to model a rice production system. GHG emission factors for transport and energy production were obtained from GHG Protocol Brasil (2012). The environmental aspects relative to the fertilizers production were taken from recognized database and included in the boundary. The inventory quantities - fossil/renewable primary energy demand (PED), - land use and - water use were analyzed. GWP (100 years), eutrophication (EU) and acidification (AP) were estimated according to the CML method (GUINÉE, 2002). Methods

1. Irrigation Irrigated system (baseline case) - A pumping system with a high flow demand - Several days to complete irrigation - Great water loss due to evaporation and shifting in the channels - Contamination of the catchment rivers by fertilizers and pesticides Underground drip irrigation system - A system of channels that directs the water flow always to the same place - Avoids water loss by evaporation and shifting - Fertilizers and pesticides are applied without loss Benefits: lower energy and water use and lower aquatic eutrophication and ecotoxicity Results

2. Drying Grain Flow Hot Air In Saturated Air Out Air Flow in the Drying Rack Traditional drying rack Uniform Grains Output New system of drying rack - Dryers with furnaces feed by rice straw or - Vapor from thermal power plant feed firewood to generate hot gases by rice straw instead of firewood - It can degrade the grain by breakage due - Differentiated system of drying rack to formation of temperature gradient that allows a more homogeneous - Breakage of the rice grain can also occurs distribution of the hot air due to the high recirculation - It reduces the recirculation of grains inside the equipment Benefits: the use of renewable energy from waste as well as a better yield of whole rice grains. Results

3. Core and clean All rice straw generated by Pilecco Nobre is sent to GEEA - Alegrete Electric Energy Producer Ltd., where it is used as raw material to produce electric energy and silica. However, a fraction of rice without straw as well as rice still with straw is lost during the straw removal process, being forwarded with the straw itself to electric energy generation. Equipment for rice recovery after straw removal It works by weight difference between the straw and the grain. Benefits: to recover the rice that used to be burnt with the straw and then increased the yield of the productive system. Results

4. Packaging PE from non-renewable resource The polyethylene from renewable resource has the same properties, performance and versatility of applications as the polyethylene from non-renewable resource, which makes easy its use. For the same reason it is recyclable in the same recycling chain of the traditional polyethylene Benefits: - Use of renewable resources - Reduction of non-renewable resources consumption (oil) - Decrease of GHG emissions PE from renewable resource (ethanol from sugar cane) Results

5. Transport Truck fleet based on traditional diesel consumption, which emits 500 mg of sulfur per liter of diesel and has an average fuel consumption of 0.33 L of diesel per km Substitution of 7 trucks by new trucks that uses diesel S10 which emits 10 mg of sulfur per liter of diesel, besides an average fuel consumption of 0.29 L of diesel per km. Benefits: -Reduction of non-renewable resources consumption (oil) - Lower GHG emissions and acidification potential than the previous fleet Results

Parameter Improvement Yield (kg/ha) 1,152.36 Primary energy demand (MJ) -234.85 Electric energy consumption (MJ) -206.94 Non-renewable energy (MJ) -26.45 Water consumption (L) -198,505.31 Non-renewable resources (kg) -7.61 Firewood consumption (kg) -71.55 Rice waste (kg) -1.42 Land use (ha) -0.03 GWP (100yr) (kg CO 2 eq) -31.43 Aquatic eutrophication (kg PO 4 ---eq) -15.75 Aquatic acidification (kg SO 2 eq) -46.16 FU = 1,000 kg of packed rice Results

Aquatic acidification (kg SO2 eq) Aquatic eutrophication (kg PO4---eq) Yield (kg/ha) GWP (100yr) (kg CO2 eq) Land use (ha) Rice waste (kg) Firewood consumption (kg) Non-renewable resources (kg) Water consumption (L) Non-renewable energy (MJ) Electric energy consumption (MJ) Primary energy demand (MJ) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Irrigation Drying Core and clean Packaging Transport Results

Conclusion This work supplied important results for the better environmental performance of the rice production, making this product a lower environmental impact than the traditionally cultivated rice. An expressive reduction of water consumption was observed in the rice cultivation due to the substitution of the irrigated rice cropping system by the underground drip irrigation rice cropping system, besides other benefits like reduction of energy use, fertilizer and pesticide loss and GHG emissions. The 15% increased yield was mainly a result of the new cultivation system. Conclusion

Acknowledgement The authors are grateful to Pilecco Nobre Alimentos Ltda. for the financial support. The authors also thank all the people who have contributed to this study or by responding the questionnaires or for their useful comments during the development of this project. Acknowledge

Thank you PRESENTED BY Leda Coltro ITAL/CETEA ledacolt@ital.sp.gov.br