D-7 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT

Similar documents
Louisiana s Marine Transportation System Plan and Sponsored Projects

AAPA Commissioners Seminar

Comprehensive Coastal & Marine Spatial Planning

THE AMERICAN WATERWAYS OPERATORS ABOUT US

Statement on Marine Transportation

The environmental licensing in the coastal and marine zones in Brazil as an instrument for the implementation of international legal regime

Waterways 1 Water Transportation History

Proposals for the Development of the National Ballast Water Management Strategy

Infrastructure Investment

Talking Points U.S. Seaports and Job Creation May 13, 2015

Appendix T: Water Quality

Testimony of Kurt J. Nagle

Ocean Dumping Act: A Summary of the Law

NATIONAL PORT STRATEGY

TOPICS FOR TODAY S DISCUSSION

The Economic Realities of Water Transportation

RESOLUTIONS PROPOSED FOR ADOPTION

Sustainable Port Development: Summary of Environmental Initiatives at Seaports Worldwide. Tim Van Wormer Port of Portland

MECHANISMS OF PREVENTION OF BLACK SEA ECOSYSTEM THREATS FROM TRANSPORT

Environmental Overview

Key Issues Impacting Ports

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BRIEF. Merchant Shipping (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Ordinance (Cap. 413)

Failure to Act. Of current Investment Trends in. Airports, Inland Waterways, and Marine Ports. Infrastructure EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

What Does the MTS Mean to Me?

access to the world s markets. The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) recognizes

U. S. Port and Waterway Modernization Strategies: Environmental Impacts Section. Institute for Water Resources March 13, 2011

Strategies for Developing an Effective Greenhouse Gas Management Program for Ports

Marine Transportation System (MTS) Marine View - MarView

22nd Annual Decisionmakers Conference Bay Planning Coalition

Inland Waterway Navigation

AAPA PORT SECURITY SEMINAR & EXHIBITION July 16 18, 2008 HOUSTON, TX REGIONAL SECURITY INITIATIVES Mitch Smith Operations Director Port of South

Mick Mulvaney Director Office of Management and Budget th Street N.W. Washington, D.C

Green Marine. Environmental Program. Performance Indicators for Ship owners

NOAA AQUACULTURE PROGRAM

Marine Board Spring Meeting April 27, 2011 David M. Kennedy

Prepcom 1 Conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of ABNJ. Policy brief IMO

IMPORTANCE OF MARPOL, LIABILITY & COMPENSATION CONVENTIONS IN THE CARIBBEAN. Cayman Maritime Conference 2017

Great Lakes Shipping Ballast Water Regulation Update. Maritime Law Association April 29,2015 Subcommittee on the Great Lakes Tom Baker

Smart Gridding to Smart Cruising

Environmental Restoration in Harbor and Port Areas

Climate Change, Marine Environmental Regulatory Development, and Sustainable Development in Ports and Shipping American Association of Port

INLAND NAVIGATION ECONOMICS WEBINAR SERIES Summary Series Wrap-up

Sediment Quality Update

Development of a Decision Support Tool for Assessing Vessel Traffic Management Requirements for U.S. Ports

Duluth-Superior Harbor Planning: A Model for Stakeholder Collaboration

NZCPS 2010 Guidance note Policy 9: Ports

An Effective Ballast Water Management Program for the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway System

International Shipbreaking Limited. Providing the Solution to an Environmental Threat

Leamus / Thinkstock. Summary of Recommendations. Navigating the North: An Assessment of the Environmental Risks of Arctic Vessel Traffic

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR VESSELS BOUND FOR OR LEAVING PORTS OF THE BALTIC SEA STATES AND CARRYING DANGEROUS OR POLLUTING GOODS

Moving Forward with Local Support Port of Oakland Case Studies: Middle Harbor Shoreline Park and Maritime Air Quality Improvement Plan (MAQIP)

Background data Risk Assessment Decision making. Yes

Marine Transportation System Infrastructure Investment A State Perspective. August 28, 2012 Sean T. Connaughton Secretary of Transportation

The Port Professional

Mobile Air Toxic Exposure Study (MATES)

Developing an Inclusive Framework for Blue Philippines. February 21, 2018

Subject: China Amended Discharge Standard for Water Pollutants

Status of international and domestic regulations on installation and use of ballast water management systems. Draft Report

Christopher Koch. Coalition of New England Companies for Trade (CONECT)

PORTLAND HARBOR SUPERFUND CLEANUP MOVING FORWARD TO A RESPONSIBLE, COLLABORATIVE SOLUTION

Can Traditional Highway Asset Management Strategies Be Adapted To Waterway Infrastructure Analysis?

NEW HAVEN HARBOR CONNECTICUT NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENT

Alaska Deep-Draft Arctic Ports Navigation Feasibility Study. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bruce Sexauer P.E. Chief of Planning, Alaska District

Implications of Global Agreements on Climate Change for Michigan. Brendan Lammers Jim Jansen Skylar VanSteenis

U.S. Ports Outlook. SEDC Conference Susan Monteverde

Green Port Long Beach

Role of Ports in Addressing Environmental Justice Issues Related to Goods Movement

Introduction: Jason Giffen, Assistant Vice President, Planning and Green Port

Sustainable freight transport in support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Document considered draft until Board considers document

POSITION DESCRIPTION. Position Title: Director General, Aquaculture Management Directorate Position Number: Department: Fisheries and Oceans

Framework for Developing Feasibility Assessments NOVEMBER 2017

The Port of New York and New Jersey. The Environment

MARITIME LNG, REGULATION AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 25 November 2014 Andrew Morris, Director

CANADA S OIL & NATURAL GAS PRODUCERS. OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRIORITIES for a prosperous British Columbia

Green Port Long Beach Global Trade, Greener Seaports: Dramatically reducing the environmental footprint of trade related activities

"The preparation and execution of the National Plan for the protection of the marine environment in the State of Kuwait"

INTERTANKO GUIDE TO GRAYWATER DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS IN THE US

PIANC Commission Working Group Report Reviews

Port of Long Beach. Green Port Policy AAPA Comprehensive Environmental Management Awards Competition

Federal Transportation Officer Training Program: Basic (Level 1)

Environment Canada. RE: Draft Canada-Ontario Agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health, 2014

PROPOSED GREAT LAKES TEST BED KEWEENAW WATERWAY AREA. Michael Beaulac Michigan Office of the Great Lakes

Statement of Richard Smith, Westar Marine Services On behalf of The American Waterways Operators

Section 3 Port Environmental Management Practices

PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS PRESENTED BY THE RESOLUTIONS COMMITTEE AT THE. CHS Inc. December 5-6, 2013 RESOLUTIONS COMMITTEE

Port Performance I Port Performance Indicators. Selection and Measurement indicators. January 2012

A. Achieving sustainable development in Asia and the Pacific

Competing Uses of Port Property

Date of Meeting: 10/03/17 Item No.: 4A_Supp. Adopt Policy Resolution Greenhouse Gas Reduction Resolution

Performance Standard 3 Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention

6Compliance. Reduce compliance costs. Plan, program, budget, and execute projects and activities that facilitate compliance

A clean environment. Towards zero-emission shipping BUSINESS WHITE PAPER KEY BENEFITS CONTENTS

February 14, Honorable Alan Lowenthal Ranking Member Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Committee on Natural Resources

Role of Ports in Addressing Environmental Justice Issues Related to Goods Movement

STRENGTHENING MARINE POLLUTION CONTROL THE INTERNATIONAL MOVE TOWARDS STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS. Hans J. Peters

ADOPTED RESOLUTIONS BY THE RESOLUTIONS COMMITTEE AT THE. CHS Inc. December 7-8, 2017 RESOLUTIONS COMMITTEE. Randy Sian, Montana, CHAIRMAN

DECLARATIONS BY MEMBER STATES AND REGIONAL GROUPS REGARDING SAFETY IN THE MARITIME TRANSPORT OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

NAMEPA s Mission protect maritime commitment marine industry Save our Seas Educate

Transcription:

D-7 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT WHEREAS, shipping moves over 80% of the world s commodities and transfers around 10 billion tons of ballast water across the globe each year; and, WHEREAS, ballast water is absolutely essential to the safe and efficient operation of modern shipping, providing balance and stability to ships; and, WHEREAS, the discharge of ballast water into coastal waters may also pose a serious ecological, economic and health threat; and, WHEREAS, the lack of strong international ballast water management regulations has led individual nations, political subdivisions of nations (e.g., states, provinces, cities) and some public port authorities to establish ballast water management regulations; and, WHEREAS, the adoption of disparate ballast water management regulations does little to protect the environment, creates potential safety and compliance difficulties for vessels, and alters the competitive position of ports; and, WHEREAS, the member nations of the International Maritime Organization have adopted the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments (the Ballast Water Convention ) to prevent, minimize and ultimately eliminate the transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens through the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the American Association of Port Authorities commends the member nations of the International Maritime Organization for their hard work in adopting the Ballast Water Convention; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the American Association of Port Authorities urges member nations of the International Maritime Organization to expeditiously ratify the Ballast Water Convention, and to adopt safe, effective, and legally binding ballast water management regulations for all vessels in accordance with the Ballast Water Convention. Resolution D-8 of 2009 (Galveston)

E-3 VESSEL TRAFFIC SERVICES WHEREAS, the Port and Tanker Safety Act of 1978 empowers the U.S. Coast Guard to develop and operate vessel traffic services in ports of the United States; WHEREAS, the U.S. Coast Guard has historically funded, installed, operated, and maintained such VTS systems under its aids to navigation responsibilities; WHEREAS, there is concern over the Coast Guard's future fiscal capability to continue to wholly fund, install, operate, and maintain such VTS systems because of limited fiscal resources; and WHEREAS, the need for and nature of such services varies among port regions depending on port geography, traffic, meteorology, and other factors including navigation hazards to be overcome by such vessel traffic services; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the American Association of Port Authorities supports the continued maintenance and improvement of established vessel traffic services where so desired by the local port and shipping interests, and urges that sufficient funds be appropriated by the Congress for said purpose; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the American Association of Port Authorities urges the establishment of local port advisory committees to assist the Coast Guard in its planning and implementation of future vessel traffic services, public or private; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Congress and the Coast Guard must ensure port authorities are shielded from liability arising out of a marine casualty within a port's VTS area, if VTS systems are privatized; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the American Association of Port Authorities urges Congress and the Coast Guard to provide ample opportunity for port authorities to actively participate and meaningfully comment at all stages of the decision-making process on policy issues including funding, scope, operation, and liability of privatizing VTS systems. Resolution E-3 of 2009 (Galveston)

E-10 CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT AND DREDGED MATERIAL TESTING WHEREAS, the American Association of Port Authorities endorses the national legislative standards in the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act and the Clean Water Act that call for protection of aquatic ecosystem diversity, productivity and stability, and the potential for adverse changes in species and community population dynamics; and WHEREAS, because dredging is essential to maintaining the viability of our harbors and waterways, the AAPA is committed to manage dredging and dredged material relocation in the most economic manner consistent with sound environmental stewardship; and WHEREAS, the presence of contaminants in sediments can represent a threat to our aquatic ecosystems if these contaminants are bioavailable; and, WHEREAS, international experts have prepared a new treaty governing the disposal of dredged material into the ocean which incorporates the state-of-the-art sediment assessment and management practices; and, WHEREAS, in those cases where contaminated sediments are identified in navigation channels, the environmental problem can be addressed through careful management practices; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that numeric values for chemicals of concern in sediments should be developed only as guidelines to determine whether further testing is necessary rather than as criteria or standards. This is advisable because the biological availability of sediment contaminants or the adverse impacts of chemicals of concern on populations or communities of marine organisms cannot be determined from sediment chemistry alone; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that risk-based approaches be used to examine potential effects of the bioavailable contaminants on marine organisms at the population and community level; (Continued)

E-10 (continued) CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT AND DREDGED MATERIAL TESTING BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Corps and EPA should consult with port authorities to develop regional guidance for different areas of the country for the Tier II testing protocols outlined in the Inland Testing Manual that would take advantage of the rich database available to support theoretical bioaccumulation analysis. Analysis of population and community effects through ecological risk assessment can be performed in many cases using theoretical bioaccumulation potential rather than by direct testing of marine organisms. Given both the expense of the tests and ambiguity in the interpretation of the results, direct testing of marine organisms should be reserved for circumstances where an ecological or human health risk assessment based on theoretical bioaccumulation indicate that there is cause for concern and further testing is warranted; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, while the AAPA recognizes that scientists will continue to develop new techniques that more accurately and efficiently allow analysis of the potential direct and indirect effects of contaminated sediments, we caution against the adoption of new analytical tests as the basis for regulatory decisions until they are sufficiently developed to be demonstrated predictors of ecological effects at the community level. To ensure this, new testing must be subject to rigorous peer review including the Corps of Engineers, EPA, port authorities, the academic community, and private testing laboratories, and subject to notice and comment prior to implementation; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that capping or confined aquatic disposal is a proven, effective management technique when contaminated sediments are encountered, and delays in implementing these measures should be minimized. Resolution E-10 of 2009 (Galveston)

E-18 USE OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS WHEREAS, the American Association of Port Authorities and their member ports are committed to responsible environmental stewardship, sustainability, and have already taken a leadership role on a number of important environmental issues, and WHEREAS, the use of domestically produced alternative and substantially cleaner conventional fuels, equipment with advanced pollution control technologies, efficiency improvements, and other strategies in the transportation sector can help achieve the goals of decreasing the dependence on foreign oil and increasing energy security, and WHEREAS, alternative fuels are substantially non-petroleum and yield energy security and environmental benefits, including, but not limited to, natural gas, propane, alcohol (in mixtures of no less than 70% of the alcohol fuel), hydrogen, fuels derived from biological materials, electricity (substantially generated from renewable sources such as hydro, wind, and solar energy; and other renewable fuels), and other low carbon alternatives, and WHEREAS, some member ports have extensive experience with the use of alternative and substantially cleaner conventional fuels, equipment with advanced pollution control technologies, efficiency improvements, and other strategies, and WHEREAS, vessels, cargo-handling equipment, locomotives, buses, and trucks that support the port-related industry are generators of air pollutants and greenhouse gases, and WHEREAS, ports and related industries are dependent upon reliable and affordable fuels, and WHEREAS, the impact that the ports represented by the AAPA can have on reducing air pollution and reliance on petroleum-based fuels would be significant, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the American Association of Port Authorities that Section 1. The American Association of Port Authorities will encourage member ports to use alternative and substantially cleaner conventional fuels, equipment with advanced pollution control technologies, efficiency improvements, and other strategies to increase energy independence, reduce air pollution, and contribute to domestic economic vitality where feasible and practicable.

E-18 (continued) USE OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS Section 2. The American Association of Port Authorities will assist members, through educational venues and other methods and means, in increasing the understanding and awareness of their customers, tenants, and neighbors of the benefits of using alternative and substantially cleaner conventional fuels, equipment with advanced pollution control technologies, efficiency improvements, and other strategies; facilitating access to related technical information; and providing information about available incentives to support such strategies where feasible and practicable. Section 3. The American Association of Port Authorities will encourage members to facilitate increased use of alternative and substantially cleaner conventional fuels, equipment with advanced pollution control technologies, efficiency improvements, and other strategies in port areas by sharing technical and educational information and by working collaboratively with each other and entities such as U.S. EPA, U.S. Dept of Energy, Clean Cities Coalitions in port areas, state and local energy and environmental agencies, alternative fuel producers and distributors, and others. Resolution E-18 of 2009 (Galveston)