Analysis of the natural and meteorological conditions during two largest forest fire events in the Slovak Paradise National Park

Similar documents
Greenhouse gas emissions from the forest fire events in the Slovak Paradise National Park according to the IPCC methodology

S-190 Introduction to Wildland Fire Behavior

Southern Rural Fire. How To Safety Burn Stubble.

Understanding the Role of Fire in Forest Management

THE SAN DIEGO DECLARATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND FIRE MANAGEMENT

David Lavoué, Ph.D. Air Quality Research Branch Meteorological Service of Canada Toronto, Ontario

Video 1. From any other page, click the button above to return to this Contents page

Fire Danger Rating Areas

Municipal Fire Ban on Open Air Burning. Factors for Consideration

UNIT V--FUEL MOISTURE

HAZARD DESCRIPTION... 1 LOCATION AND HISTORICAL...

Part A: The Fire Behavior and the Wildland-Fire Environment. (Rev. 01/31/2006)

Future vulnerability assessment of forest fire sector to climate change impacts in Cyprus

OLALLA AREA FIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT SUMMARY RESULTS

CASE STUDY. Fire behaviour of RWF (Nordegg, Alberta) Colleen Mooney INTRODUCTION. April 2014

Adaptation Strategy of the Slovak Republic on Adverse Impacts of Climate Change Overview: Executive Summary

Topography 2A-1-S190-EP

3.0 Landscape Wildfire Threat Analysis

2.5. Effects of topography on fire behavior

Wildland Fire Operations

Modeling tools for examining how climate change & management influence wildfire activity & effects

A prescribed burning risk assessment tool (BRAT)

LECTURE #21: Wild Fires: The Science & History

Stand structure and fire behaviour. Dave Schroeder Wildfire Management Branch Alberta Agriculture and Forestry

Environmental and Climate change in Mongolia

Script Mod 1 Understanding Wildfire Threat to Homes

Due diligence considerations for prescribed fire on Vancouver Island

California forest fires

The climatic water balance in an ecological context

Summer thermal comfort in traditional buildings of the 19th century in Florina, north-western Greece

CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND GROUNDWATER RECHARGE: CASE STUDY OF WATER BALANCE FOR THE CENTRAL NORTH BULGARIA

Climate-induced tree response in the forest-tundra and forest-steppe ecotones

Town of Canmore. Climate Change Adaptation Background Report and Resilience Plan

Wildland Fire Management Strategy

Effects of Fire on Water Infiltration Rates in a Ponderosa Pine Stand

Research Article Fire Weather Index Implementation in the Alpine Area

Fire Susceptibility in Oregon

Introduction to wildfires. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Simon Schnabl Assist. Marko Radak

S100A Recertification. Test information

Sydney fires caused by people and nature

Future Climate and Wildfire. Mike Flannigan University of Alberta and the Canadian Partnership for Wildland Fire Science

Kamloops Fire Centre KAMLOOPS FIRE CENTRE BOUNDARIES

Volume II: Hazard Annex Drought

Climate, Soils, and Seed Production. Thomas G Chastain CSS 460/560 Seed Production

Ecosystems on land are grouped into biomes primarily based on the plant communities within them.

Impacts of deforestation on water balance components of a watershed on the Silesian Beskid

Forest fires and climate change: Present and future evolution in Galicia (NW Spain)

APPLICATIONS OF AN OPERATIONAL COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR IRRIGATION PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT IN ROMANIA

APPENDIX D: WILDFIRE ASSESSMENT

ON THE ISSUE OF USING COLD ASPHALT-CONCRETE MIX IN CONDITIONS OF MONGOLIA. D. GERELNYAM, Ph.D. Department of Road (Government Implementing Agency)

79. Which country is the second largest in the world in land area? A. Alaska B. Russia C. Canada D. United States

Report on Fire Danger Rating System (FDRS)

Illinois in Drought. June 19, 2012, Updated June 21, 2012

extinction rates. (d) water availability and solar radiation levels are highest in the tropics. (e) high temperature causes rapid speciation.

WESTERN CORDILLERA. Physical Features Mountainous region, tectonically active.

EUROPEAN APPROACH IN ASSESSING GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY OF THE MURÁNSKA PLANINA PLATEAU, SLOVAKIA

Fire & Characteristics of Wildfire

The Geography of Russia

Thanks to Bill Elliot, Research Leader U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service

Daily maps of fire danger over Mediterranean Europe

In the Southeastern United States,

Second level analysis on extreme biotic occurrences

Agricultural drought index and monitoring on national scale. LU Houquan National Meteorological Center, CMA

Forest fire danger forecasting in Poland

Climate Change Impact on Pastures and Livestock Systems in Kyrgyzstan

Implications of Drought / Low Snow Pack on Community Water Supply

M. Erdenetuya (PhD) NRSC of Mongolia June 2013 Tsukuba, Japan

DROUGHT DEFINITIONS: BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

APPLICATION OF REMOTE SENSING DATA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF THE UJUK MOUNTAIN BOREAL FORESTS (THE TYVA REPUBLIC, RUSSIA)

1. Global Climate. Latitude and Sunlight Intensity 12/4/2014. Chapter 52: Introduction to Ecology and the Biosphere. 1.

Fire History and Management

! Ural Mountains. Please SAVE and PRINT the document file transferred to you when you logged in to help you take notes during class. !

OTBA. THEME: Forests - Friends for Life

How could we possibly change the Hydrologic Cycle on an Island as big as Vancouver Island?

The atmosphere is warming

DROUGHT AND THEIR EVALUATION ОЦЕНКА ПОЯВЛЕНИЯ ЗАСУХИ. Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava,

Assessment. Forest Plan Revision

Executive Summary. San Marcos Pass - Eastern Goleta Valley Mountainous Communities Community Wildfire Protection Plan

Report on an intercomparison study of modelled, Europe-wide forest fire risk for present day conditions

Weather&Wildfire: Winter Fire Weather Webinar. What you should know. What your audience should know. Juan Acuna Tom Spencer Stuart Coombs

Macro and Micro Climate Climate

Hydrological Threats to Ecosystem Services Provided by USDA Forest Service

Research of Forest Fire Prediction Method

Chapter 40a. Ch. 52 An Introduction to Ecology and the Biosphere

Comparison of Discharge Duration Curves from Two Adjacent Forested Catchments Effect of Forest Age and Dominant Tree Species

Home to about 56 million people, the Southwest includes Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Colorado and most of California.

15.1 Life in the Earth System. KEY CONCEPT The biosphere is one of Earth s four interconnected systems.

Annex 2: Assess the efficiency rates in function of environmental and climatic conditions and agricultural practices

Variations of sound from wind turbines during different weather conditions

European Botanic Gardens in a Changing World: Insights into EUROGARD VI

CYPRUS REPORT FOR COMBATING DESERTIFICATION

Contact zones of the Amur River basin: Landscape structure, Land cover and Anthropogenic influence

Unit III Nutrients & Biomes

Drought monitoring and early warning indicators as tools for climate change adaptation

HIGHLANDS Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Presentation to Council March 1 st 2010 Val Fletcher Emergency Coordinator

Grassland Curing Guide

Climate and Biodiversity

Forest Biomes. Chapter 9

Climate Change and the Campus. Contents. Welcome. iii. Introduction: A Word about Scientific Knowledge. Section 1: What Is Climate Change?

TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIABILITY IN NORTH CAROLINA PIEDMONT

Transcription:

Analysis of the natural and meteorological conditions during two largest forest fire events in the Slovak Paradise National Park Jaroslav Skvarenina 1, Jozef Mindas 2, Jan Holecy 1 & Jan Tucek 1 1 Technical University of Zvolen, T.G.Masaryka 24, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia, jarosk@vsld.tuzvo.sk, holecy@vsld.tuzvo.sk, tucek@vsld.tuzvo.sk 2 Forest Research Institute, T.G.Masaryka 22, 960 92 Zvolen, Slovakia, mindas@fris.sk Keywords: forest fire, Baumgartner fire index, Nesterov fire index, Angstrőm index, Slovak Paradise National Park Abstract Paper gives the analysis of the two largest forest fire events in the W-UI of Slovak Paradise National Park (July 1976 and October 2000). There are analysed the geological, soil and topographical conditions of the fire occurrence, here. Thoroughly were evaluated the meteorological factors influencing the ignition and propagation of the fire occurrence (air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed). Three forest fire weather indices were calculated (Baumgartner, Angstrőm and Nesterov indices). As the most sensitive measure of the fire occurrence risk forecasting seems to be the Angstrőm index. Introduction The climate, topography and vegetation (forest types) are considered to be the key factors accounting for fuel load and its flammability and for evaluating fire potential in the forest. In mountains, topography determines both vertical (zonal) climatic changes as elevation changes and a great variety of site climates as slopes change. Zonal and site climates in turn cause corresponding vertical vegetation zones and forest types. Fuel load is determined by vegetation structure (forest type) and climate. Within a given fuel type, fire behavior is regulated largely by the state of the weather. Meteorological factors play a key role in affecting wildfire occurrence and behaviour. Weather variables are often combined in specific meteorological fire danger indices that provide estimations of fire danger level at a given time. Weather variables are often combined in specific meteorological fire danger indices that provide estimations of fire danger level at a given time. A number of indices have been developed so far, and many of them are currently applied in operational conditions. Some indices are more suited to rate the probability of fire occurrence, while others are also related to the conditions for fire spreading; the fire danger concept refers to both the fire occurrence probability and the expected fire severity (Bovio and Camia 1997). The fuel flammability is evaluated by using the weather indices like the Nesterov index widely used in Russia, or the Baumgartner and M 68 Index in Germany. A fire-danger

rating system, the Angstrom index, was devised in Sweden and has been used all over Scandinavia (Langholz and Schmidtmayer 1993). The occurrence of the great forest fire events in Slovakia has been documented only by the values of meteorological elements (air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation wind speed etc.), so far. There have not been calculated any specific meteorological fire danger indices, here yet. Weather national fire danger rating system still has been in the stage of preparation only. The paper is focused on the analysis of the natural and meteorological conditions during these two largest forest fire events in the Slovak Paradise National Park: The first fire occurred at the Kysel Rift in the morning on July 17th to July 22th 1976. The forest of 29.22 ha was completely burned out. The second fire occurred recently on October 23th, to November 7th 2000 as the consequence of incinerating rests of timber after its extraction by forest workers, at the place called Tri Kopce (Three Hills). Area of 64 ha belonging to the unique natural forest was completely destroyed. This event required the lives of 6 forest workers. Analysis of the natural conditions The territory of the Slovak Paradise is characterized by the low precipitation totals (570 650 mm per year) due to the rain shadow of the Tatra Mts, in which is the whole area situated. The geological ground of wild-land area mainly consists of limestone and partly of dolomite. The karst relief together with the mentioned subterranean caves and rifts act as a good drainage of the whole terrain and serve as the excellent air-conditions promoting the propagation of fire, if it occurs. Rendzinas which have developed as the main types of soil here, are rocky and very shallow. These types of soil are not able to keep larger amounts of water. Due to its properties, soil here quickly gets rid of any water and dries soon after rain. During a dangerous summer or drought periods, this soil contains very small amount of water. The continual cover of dense grass is represented by plant communities consisting of rather higher and very combustible species. Natural forests growing on steep slopes and rocky ridges consist of the relict pine and pine larch stands with the spruce and the beech at bottoms of numerous rifts and valleys. Due to the lack of soil water, the coniferous litter here is very difficult to disintegrate and so represents the highly flammable stock of fuel. Extraordinary dangerous from the fire propagation point of view are young pine and spruce stands (up to 20 years of age). They contain a lot of dry branches that are growing very closely to the land surface that is often covered by grass. There are several reasons why is the all W-UI territory of the Slovak Paradise National Park susceptible to burn and so strongly vulnerable from the forest fire occurrence point of view. Shallow soils on steep slopes of limestone and karst fields which are often dry especially during the vegetation period. Mostly coniferous natural uneven aged fully stocked forest stands which can act (under favourable conditions) as the excellent medium of fire propagation. Nearly inaccessible terrain due to the lack of convenient road network, which makes extinguishing works extremely difficult.

Rain shadow of the High Tatras Mountains influencing mostly northern part of the park. Analysis of meteorological conditions This analysis was carried out using the daily fire weather data, recorded at the meteorological station Poprad airport (695 m a.s.l.). These data enabled to track the development of fire danger conditions in the region of Slovak Paradise National Park from the beginnings of the 1976 and 2000 fire seasons. For the evaluation of the mentioned two largest fire events the following 3 indices were used: German Baumgartner Index (BI): BI = P PE (sum of 5 days) Where: P- precipitation (mm) PE potential evapotranspiration (mm) The system is divided into the following fire danger classes as follows: Fire danger classes/ 1 2 3 4 5 Month (mm) March + 5 > + 5 to - 3-3 to - 9-9 to - 15-15 < April + 3 > + 3 to - 8-8 to - 16-16 to -27-27 < May - 3 > - 3 to - 16-16 to - 25-25 to - 35-35 < June - 12 > - 12 to - 24-24 to - 32-32 to - 41-41 < July - 12 > - 12 to - 24-24 to - 31-31 to - 40-40 < August - 8 > - 8 to - 20-20 to - 28-28 to - 37-37 < September - 6 > - 6 to - 18-18 to - 26-26 to - 35-35 < October - 6 > - 6 to - 18-18 to - 26-26 to - 35-35 < Nesterov ignition index (N), Russian fire-rating system, there was devised in the former Soviet Union in 1949 and is calculated as follows: Where: N -Nesterov Index W - number of days since the last rainfall > 3mm t - temperature ( C) D - dew point temperature ( C) Its computation begins on the first spring day when the height of temperature is above freezing after the snow melting and continues until the rainfall of 3 mm. 31

Five different fire danger classes are used depending on the value of the index (Shetinsky1994): 1) N<0 no fire risk, 2) 1<N<1 000 low risk, 3) 1 001<N<4 000 medium risk, 4) 4 001<N<10 000 high risk, 5) N>10 000 extremely high risk Angstrőm index (I): was devised in Sweden and has been used all over the Scandinavia. The index, I, is given by: Where: R - relative humidity (%) T - air temperature ( C) The values for I translate into fire danger as follow: 1) I > 4.0 fire occurrence unlikely 2) 4.0 < I < 3.0 fire conditions unfavourable 3) 3.0 < I < 2.5 fire conditions favourable 4) 2.5 < I < 2.0 fire conditions more favourable 5) I < 2.0 fire occurrence very likely Results concerning the mutual comparison of weather indices The information value of the presented indices concerning the classification of the weather suitability to the fire occurrence is, however, limited in the intensively managed agricultural areas. Usually, forest fire does not occur even during the periods of extreme drought unless the influence of human element. During the vegetation period of 1976, there was the dry weather with a deficit of precipitation. The meteorological situation before this fire event: Southern anticyclonic situation, warm, dry weather ( C), southern hot wind (6-8 m/s), climate water balance deficit 42 mm of water. Figure 1 shows the curse of meteorological measures: precipitation, temperature, relative humidity, wind speed from the 1st April till the 31st August 1976. Figure 2 depicts the course of the all-3 applied indices the date of the beginning and the duration of fire at the locality of Kysel, as well. The second fire event that took place in the year 2000 started in the not typical season of the year, on the 22nd of October. This event was preceded by the extremely dry and warm vegetation period and the autumn with the long lasting deficit of precipitation. Meteorological situation before fire event: Southeastern anticyclonic situation, warm, dry weather (26 C) southern dry wind (5-7 m/s). Climate water balance deficit 12 mm of water. Figure 3 depicts the course of meteorological measures: precipitation, temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed from The 1st August till The 31st November 2000. Figure 4 presents the course of the all-3 applied indices, the date and the duration of fire at the locality of Tri Kopce, as well. The comparison of terms concerning the beginnings of both these fire events with the meteorological data points out the fact that both these events are connected with the decline of the relative humidity beneath 40 % (Figure 1 and Figure 3). Wittich (1998) explains this phenomenon by the very close correlation between the content of water in litter and values of the relative air humidity. 32

Both these fire events are essentially related to the high values of the meteorological fire danger indices. For the better comparison of the mentioned indices Table 1 and Table 2 present both the absolute and the relative frequencies of fire danger classes. The analysis shows the different inertias and sensibilities of particular indices. For example, the Angstrőm index shows quick time fluctuations, while the Baumgartner index shows the undisturbed course with the moderate inertia. The Nesterov index and partly also the Baumgartner index only seldom approach the highest fire danger levels (class 5). During the summer season (July 1976), the Russian-continental Nesterov index preliminary seems to be the less sensitive indicator of the fire danger levels under conditions of the low humid-temperate climate of the Slovak Paradise National Park. Inspite of this fact, the Nesterov index in comparison with the German Baumgartner index, has approached the higher fire danger levels during the dry continental weather in October 2000. Table 1: The absolute values (abs.) and relative frequencies (rel.%) of particular fire danger classes concerning meteorological fire indices for the period from the 1st April till the 31st August, 1976. 1976 fire danger classes/ index 1 2 3 4 5 abs. rel.% abs. rel.% abs. rel.% abs. rel.% abs. rel.% Baumgartner 55 37 49 33 22 15 22 15 1 1 Nesterov 37 24 40 26 57 37 19 13 0 0 Angstrőm 42 28 42 28 28 18 28 18 13 8 Table 2: The absolute values (abs.) and relative frequencies (rel.%) of particular fire danger classes concerning meteorological fire indices for the period from the 1st August till the 31st November, 2000. 2000 fire danger classes/ index 1 2 3 4 5 abs. rel.% abs. rel.% abs. rel.% abs. rel.% abs. rel.% Baumgartner 54 44 41 34 19 16 8 7 0 0 Nesterov 32 26 18 15 26 21 39 32 7 6 Angstrőm 53 43 36 12 10 9 7 12 10 33

Conclusions The submitted analysis includes only the periods of the two largest forest fire events in the territory of the Slovak Paradise National Park. We are aware, that only a more detailed evaluation of the all other recorded historical forest fire events and corresponding meteorological data can provide the more exact results and consequences for the choice of the most suitable weather fire index for the forest fire danger forecast within the W-UI of the Slovak Paradise National Park. According to the presented preliminary results, as the most efficient seems to be the future combined use of the index based on the water balance (Baumgartner index) and the index that includes also measure of the relative air humidity (Angstrőm index). Acknowledgement Authors gratefully thank to the WARM Project co-funded by the European Commission (5th Framework Programme) and to the Project VEGA No. 1/9265/02 for funding the opportunity to carry out this kind of research in the territory of Slovak Paradise National Park. References Bovio G. and A. Camia. 1997. Meteorological Indices for Large Fires Danger Rating. In: "A review of remote sensing methods for the study of large wildland fires", Ed. by E. Chuvieco, Alcalà de Henares (Spain), 73-90. Langholz H. and E. Schmidtmayer. 1993. Meteorologische Verfaren zur Abschatzung des Waldbrandrisikos. AFZ, Nr. 8. : 394-396. Shetinsky, E. A. 1994. Protection of forests and forest pyrology [in Russian]. Ecology, Moscow, 209 p. Wittich, K.P. 2003. Waldbrandgefahren-Vorhersage des Deutschen Wetterdienstes. AFZ/Der Wald, Nr. 6: 321-324 34

Figure 1: Air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and precipitation totals for the period from the 1st April till the 31st August, 1976 (Fire Kysel Rift) National Park Slovak Paradise Forest fire 17. VII. - 22. VII. 1976 100 100 90 90 Temperature ( C), Wind speed (m/s) 80 70 60 50 40 20 10 80 70 60 50 40 20 10 Precipitation (mm), Relative humidity (%) 0 0 1-IV. 5-IV. 9-IV. 13-IV. 17-IV. 21-IV. 25-IV. 29-IV. 3-V. 7-V. 11-V. 15-V. 19-V. 23-V. 27-V. 31-V. 4-VI. 8-VI. 12-VI. 16-VI. 20-VI. 24-VI. 28-VI. 2-VII. 6-VII. 10-VII. 14-VII. 18-VII. 22-VII. 26-VII. -VII. 3-VIII. 7-VIII. 11-VIII. 15-VIII. 19-VIII. 23-VIII. 27-VIII. 31-VIII. Date 2000 FIRE Precipitation Tmax Wind Speed Relative Humidity Figure 2: The comparison concerning the performance of the Baumgartner, Angstrőm and Nesterov indices for the period from the 1st April till the 31st August, 1976 (Fire Kysel Rift) 5 National Park Slovak Paradise Forest fire 17. VII. - 22. VII. 1976 4 Fire index 3 2 1 1-IV. 5-IV. 9-IV. 13-IV. 17-IV. 21-IV. 25-IV. 29-IV. 3-V. 7-V. 11-V. 15-V. 19-V. 23-V. 27-V. 31-V. 4-VI. 8-VI. 12-VI. 16-VI. 20-VI. 24-VI. 28-VI. 2-VII. 6-VII. 10-VII. 14-VII. 18-VII. 22-VII. 26-VII. -VII. 3-VIII. 7-VIII. 11-VIII. 15-VIII. 19-VIII. 23-VIII. 27-VIII. 31-VIII. Date 1976 FIRE Baumgartner Index Nesterov Index Angstrom Index 35

Figure 3: Air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and precipitation totals for the period from the 1st August till the 31st November, 2000 (Fire Three Hills). National Park Slovak Paradise Forest fire 23. X. - 07. XI. 2000 100 100 90 90 Temperature ( C), Wind speed (m/s) 80 70 60 50 40 20 10 80 70 60 50 40 20 10 Precipitation (mm), Relative humidity (%) 0 0 1-VIII. 4-VIII. 7-VIII. 10-VIII. 13-VIII. 16-VIII. 19-VIII. 22-VIII. 25-VIII. 28-VIII. 31-VIII. 3-IX. 6-IX. 9-IX. 12-IX. 15-IX. 18-IX. 21-IX. 24-IX. 27-IX. -IX. 3-X. 6-X. 9-X. 12-X. 15-X. 18-X. 21-X. 24-X. 27-X. -X. 2-XI. 5-XI. 8-XI. 11-XI. 14-XI. 17-XI. 20-XI. 23-XI. 26-XI. 29-XI. Date 2000 FIRE Precipitation Tmax Wind Speed Relative Humidity Figure 4: The comparison concerning the performance of the Baumgartner, Angstrőm and Nesterov indices for the period from the 1st August till the 31st November, 2000 (Fire Three Hills). 5 National Park Slovak Paradise Forest fire 23. X. - 07. XI. 2000 4 Fire index 3 2 1 1-VIII. 5-VIII. 9-VIII. 13-VIII. 17-VIII. 21-VIII. 25-VIII. 29-VIII. 2-IX. 6-IX. 10-IX. 14-IX. 18-IX. 22-IX. 26-IX. -IX. 4-X. 8-X. 12-X. 16-X. 20-X. 24-X. 28-X. 1-XI. 5-XI. 9-XI. 13-XI. 17-XI. 21-XI. 25-XI. 29-XI. Date 2000 FIRE Baumgartner Fire Index Nesterov Index Angstrom Index 36