Restricted Distribution IOC/EC-XXXVII/2 Annex 8 Paris, 22 April 2004 Original: English. INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION (of UNESCO)

Similar documents
Forty-first Session of the Executive Council UNESCO, Paris, 24 June 1 July 2008

Draft decision prepared by the working group on institutional arrangements and rules of procedure

13th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

Agenda Item 5: Stockholm + 50 an opportunity to consider a new long-term vision for the global environmental agenda in the context of the 2030 Agenda

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly [on the report of the Second Committee (A/64/420/Add.6)] 64/203. Convention on Biological Diversity

INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION (of UNESCO)

OPEN-ENDED WORKING GROUP (OEWG) ON THE EXAMINATION OF THE MOST APPROPRIATE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE MEMORY OF THE WORLD

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

UN-Water Terms of Reference Management Team

UN World Water Assessment Programme

Economic and Social Council 19 July 2017

UNESCO, 12 October 2009

RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONVENTION WITH THE OTHER CONVENTIONS, INSTITUTIONS AND PROCESSES

Sensitization Seminar on the Work of the International Seabed Authority (28 to 20 March 2011, Kingston)

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AT ITS NINTH MEETING

OVERARCHING FRAMEWORK UNEP GLOBAL MERCURY PARTNERSHIP

JOINT STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Synopsis of the outcome of the consultation on international ocean governance. Accompanying the document

Indicative Marrakech Partnership work programme for 2019

Opening Remarks by Ms. Patricia O Brien Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs The Legal Counsel

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Executive Board

Agenda item 10(c) Emissions from fuel used for international aviation and maritime transport

E Distribution: GENERAL. Executive Board First Regular Session. Rome, 8 11 February 2010

WHC-11/35.COM/12A Paris, 6 May 2011 Original: English/French

Restricted distribution IOC-XVIII/2 Annex 9 Paris, 8 June 1995 English only. INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION (of UNESCO)

World Heritage UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

Ocean Carbon Changes in the open and coastal ocean

Lessons Learned from Global MDG Monitoring

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION REPORT 2018/105. Audit of strategic support to the global humanitarian inter-agency coordination mechanisms

FOREST EUROPE Structures, Procedures and Work Modalities

UNEP Funding Strategy Universal Membership Global Responsibility

Report of the Executive Committee of the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage associated with Climate Change Impacts

The UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development ( )

General Assembly. Ad Hoc Working Group of the Whole. United Nations Headquarters, New York. 28 February to 1 March 2018 INFORMATION FOR PARTICIPANTS

Revised estimates relating to the programme budget for the biennium related to the Rule of Law Unit

Letter dated 2 July 2001 from the Permanent Representative of Monaco to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General

INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION (of UNESCO) Twenty-second Session of the Assembly Paris, 24 June-4 July 2003

Commonwealth Youth Council General Assembly St Pauls Bay, Malta, November 2015

COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES

CMS Resolution on Further Steps to Abate Underwater Noise Pollution for the Protection of Cetaceans and Other Migratory Species

United Nations Environment Programme

Recalling the core functions of the regional associations established in Article 18 of the Convention.

Draft action plan for DCF-GPEDC complementarity and synergies

COOPERATION BETWEEN CMS AND CBD (Prepared by the Secretariat)

SAICM/OEWG.3/4. Note by the secretariat. Distr.: General 4 February 2019 Original: English

A regular process for the global reporting and assessment of the state of the marine environment, including socio-economic aspects*

International Coral Reef Initiative Framework For Action Approved 3 June 1995 PREAMBLE

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

Economic and Social Council

Report of the Executive Committee of the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage associated with Climate Change Impacts

Science Strategy

COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES

Council of the European Union Brussels, 13 July 2018 (OR. en)

A. Proposals for the integration of climate-change activities within the programmes of work of the Convention

General Assembly resolution on the repositioning of the United Nations development system, in the context of the QCPR

Strategic Framework International Recovery Platform

GESAMP. Tim Jickells & Bob Duce. Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia, Norwich UK

Note by the Consultative Group of Experts on National Communications from Parties not included in Annex I to the Convention

Future programme, organization and methods of work of the Commission on Sustainable Development

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JOB DESCRIPTION

Non-Legally binding Instrument (NLBI) on Sustainable Development of All Types of Forests. Dr J V Sharma

Implementation of Global Oceans Commitments

COMMISSION DECISION. of on the creation of a High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance in the context of the Capital Markets Union

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION BETWEEN

UNODC Evaluation Policy Independent Evaluation Unit

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

United Nations. Cultural Organization. Key publications

THE M A PROGRAMME ON OCEAN RESOUBCES AID DEVELOPMENT OF LATIN AMEBICA AND THE CARIBBEAN UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

Further appreciating the political and financial support of each of the Contracting Parties to the Nairobi Convention;

Economic and Social Council

UNEP/GCSS.XII/11. Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme

BES. Intergovernmental Science-Policy. Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Work on capacity-building (deliverables 1 (a) and 1 (b))

IOC/SC-WESTPAC-XI/9 Bangkok, 16 March 2017 English only

RESOLUTION MEPC.304(72) (adopted on 13 April 2018) INITIAL IMO STRATEGY ON REDUCTION OF GHG EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS

United Nations Environment Programme 143 rd meeting of the Committee of Permanent Representatives Nairobi, 28 September 2018 Agenda Item 8

SUBMISSION BY NORWAY ON APA AGENDA ITEM 7

Sixteenth meeting of UN-Oceans April 2017 International Seabed Authority, Kingston, Jamaica

ECOSOC Dialogue The longer-term positioning of the United Nations development system. Session I ECOSOC Chamber, 15 December a.m. 6 p.m.

2007/40 Non-legally binding instrument on all types of forests

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/57/468/Add.1)]

ICES Stocktaking of its Role and Capabilities in Ocean and Coastal Sustainability

Memorandum of Understanding Between VNGOC and NYNGOC

Supreme Audit Institutions Performance Measurement Framework

General Assembly. United Nations A/AC.105/L.297

UNITED NATIONS MANDATES ON NGO ACCREDITATION AND PARTICIPATION IN UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCES AND MEETINGS

18 May Excellency,

Major Groups and Other Stakeholders High Level Political Forum Coordination Mechanism Terms of Reference

2/5. Delivering on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

United Nations Forum on Forests Bureau of the Seventh Session (UNFF7 Bureau) Minutes of the second meeting

The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS): A New Governance Structure in Support of Integration

Questionnaire on scope and methodology of a global sustainable development report

United Nations Conference Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III) Second session of the Preparatory Committee

Indicators for Measuring the Integration of Disaster Risk Reduction in UN Programming

Global Health Cluster Interim Terms of Reference

Decision IG.21/13. Governance

SAI Performance Measurement Framework Implementation strategy

Roles & Responsibilities Company Officers & Chief Executive

Progress update on the consideration of a draft resolution regarding the development of a Global Pact for the Environment

Economic and Social Council 19 June 2013

The World Meteorological Organization, the International Council of Scientific Unions and the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission,

Major Groups and Other Stakeholders High Level Political Forum Coordination Mechanism Terms of Reference

Transcription:

Restricted Distribution IOC/EC-XXXVII/2 Annex 8 Paris, 22 April 2004 Original: English INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION (of UNESCO) Thirty-seventh Session of the Executive Council Paris, 23 29 June 2004 Agenda Item: 4.2.1 TOWARDS A NEW GESAMP: DEVELOPMENTS, STRATEGY AND FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS This document provides summary information on the Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP), the developments leading to an improved mechanism called the NEW GESAMP, the executive summary of the strategic vision (IOC/INF-1196) and the financial implications for IOC. The Executive Council is invited to consider GESAMP s new strategy and instruct the Executive Secretary to ensure establishment of an Inter-Agency Memorandum of Understanding between the existing GESAMP sponsors, consistent with the strategic document titled The new GESAMP, Science for Sustainable Oceans. (SC-2004/CONF.201/CLD.6)

What is GESAMP and Why a NEW GESAMP? 1 The Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution (GESAMP), is a joint interagency advisory scientific body on marine pollution and marine environmental protection, sponsored by IMO, FAO, UNESCO/IOC, WMO, WHO, IAEA, UNEP and UN DOALOS. GESAMP was established in 1969 in response to a request by the United Nations Administrative Committee on Co-ordination (ACC). ACC noted that organizations within the United Nations system should, in order to avoid duplication of efforts, together develop a mechanism for interdisciplinary consideration of marine pollution problems. 2 The group provides scientific advice in five areas: Assessment of the potential effects of marine pollutants; Scientific basis for research and monitoring programmes; International exchange of scientific information relevant to assessment and control of marine pollution; Scientific principles for control and management of anthropogenic effects on the marine environment; and The scientific basis and criteria relating to legal instruments and other measures for prevention, control and abatement of marine pollution (IOC/INF-1197). In recent years, it has expanded its responsibility to include key topics related to marine environmental protection and integrated coastal management. Members are natural and social scientists, coastal managers and resource economists nominated by the sponsoring agencies but working in their individual capacity as marine specialists. Problems are technically reviewed and assessed through working groups composed of members and other specialists, drawing upon the world-wide oceanographic, marine science and coastal management communities. Members and working group specialists have come from over 50 countries. 3 Over 31 years, GESAMP has produced 48 reports on technical topics related to marine pollution, protection and conservation. The Group has produced four global State of the Marine Environment reports. Over its history, GESAMP has contributed to the landmark Stockholm Conference (1972), MARPOL 73/78, the UN Convention on Law of the Sea, the Bruntland Commission s report on sustainable development (1987), the Rio Conference (UNCED) and Agenda 21 (1992), and the Washington Protocol on LBA - land-based activities (1995). 4 At its seventh session in April 1999, the UN Commission on Sustainable Development called upon the sponsoring organizations of GESAMP to review its methods of work with a view to improving its effectiveness and inclusiveness, whilst maintaining its status as a source of agreed independent advice. 5 Since 1992 the sponsoring organizations have reviewed the memorandum on GESAMP including its functions and operational procedures several times; the last comprehensive review took place in August 1999. 6 In March 2000, the Executive Director of UNEP, Mr K. Topfer, recommended that an evaluation of the productivity and efficiency of GESAMP together with its operational procedures be carried out by at least two experts, one representing governments and one representing the scientific community.

Page 2 7 The intersecretariat coordinating group for GESAMP, comprising the Administrative Secretary provided by IMO and the Technical Secretaries from the sponsoring organizations, as well as its Chairman and Vice-Chairman, met on 21 and 22 May 2000 to consider in detail the UNEP proposal, taking into account a further note from UNEP submitted to this Intersecretariat Meeting requesting that: all the sponsoring organizations of GESAMP agree in principle that an independent and thorough evaluation was necessary; and that all the necessary arrangements for this evaluation should be done by the Administrative Secretariat of GESAMP (i.e. IMO). 8 IOC agreed with the proposal from UNEP and gave its consent in early 2000. 9 An evaluation team of four experts was established at the GESAMP Intersecretariat Meeting in May 2000 1. It consisted of: two scientists (one from a developed country and one from a developing county) that were identified by the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR); two governmental experts (also one from a developed country and one from a developing county) that were recommended by the Co-chairpersons of the United Nations Openended Informal Consultative Process on Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (ICP); and an additional expert who has been an ex-member or ex-chairperson of GESAMP. 10 The Team was asked to carry out an independent and in-depth evaluation of the achievements of GESAMP, its impact, scope, working methods and future role. 11 The GESAMP Evaluation Team concluded that the United Nations, its member States and other organizations require an effective, efficient and independent group to provide advice on issues relating to marine environmental protection and management and sustainable development of marine resources and amenities based on sound scientific principles. 12 Furthermore, the GESAMP Evaluation Team strongly recommended that GESAMP be continued to play that role. However, major changes will be necessary in the structure of GESAMP, its operational procedures and products. These changes will be necessary for GESAMP to set priorities, examine issues more effectively, provide appropriate and timely advice, and to enhance its profile, visibility and responsiveness towards those requesting its advice and thus contribute to capacity building activities. In detailed recommendations, the GESAMP Evaluation Team provided the building blocks for a new structure for GESAMP. 13 Following the evaluation, the discussions and consultations among GESAMP experts, its sponsoring organizations, and a variety of interested external parties have led to a strategic vision for a "New GESAMP" that will: Maintain and strengthen GESAMP's established credibility; Strengthen engagement both with the broader scientific community through a robust and re-enforced peer-review process and through a transparent and periodical selection and replacement of its members and with governments and other major user groups to enhance the relevance and legitimacy of GESAMP's advice; and Ensure professionalism in work methods, management, and product delivery. 14 The strategic vision is described in detail in a document called The New GESAMP, Science for Sustainable Oceans. The Executive Summary of the strategic document for the NEW GESAMP is provided at the end if this document. 1 Keith Bradley (UK) Chair, Julie Hall (NZ), Swami Krishnaswami (India), Herbert Windom (USA)

Page 3 Financial Considerations for IOC 15 The strategic document (IOC/INF-1196) indicates that GESAMP's core activities will be financed from a Trust Fund, an initial budget estimate for which is US$600,000 annually. Individual project activities will be financed from separate project accounts, which will vary according to project requirements. 16 With its limited funds, IOC can support one scientist as a core member of GESAMP experts. Considering the additional expenses associated with the activities of the GESAMP Intersecretariat, the annual costs are estimated to be US$6,000. If IOC co-sponsors a GESAMP Working Group with three experts the estimated cost is US$20,000 per annum. 17 The new GESAMP mechanism and an accompanying Memorandum of Understanding between the cosponsors are subjected to the approval of all of the each sponsoring agency. THE NEW GESAMP (Executive Summary) GESAMP is a group of experts that advises the United Nations (UN) system on the scientific aspects of marine environmental protection. GESAMP is needed first because of the international policy requirement for a cross-sectoral, interdisciplinary, and science-based approach to marine environmental affairs, and second to meet the practical requirement coordination and cooperation among UN agencies with relevant responsibilities through a joint advisory mechanism. GESAMP consists of 25-30 experts in a wide range of disciplines relevant to marine environmental protection, including socio-economic ones. Experts act in their individual capacity, not as representatives of their governments or institutions, ensuring the independence of GESAMP's advice. Individual studies and assessments are usually carried out by specialist working groups that also include experts who are not current members of GESAMP. This broadens the network of experts involved in GESAMP activities and provides for the tailoring of expertise to specific projects. From its establishment in 1969 to June 2003 GESAMP produced 43 in-depth technical studies and four broad assessments of the state of the global marine environment. GESAMP's mission is: "To provide authoritative, independent, interdisciplinary scientific advice to organizations and governments to support the protection and sustainable use of the marine environment." To fulfil its mission GESAMP will, in response to requests: 1. Integrate and synthesize the results of regional and thematic assessments and scientific studies to support global assessments of the marine environment; 2. Provide scientific and technical guidance on the design and execution of marine environmental assessments;

Page 4 3. Provide scientific reviews, analyses, and advice on specific topics relevant to the condition of the marine environment, its investigation, protection, and/or management. In addition GESAMP will regularly: 4. Provide an overview of the marine environmental monitoring, assessment, and related activities of UN agencies and advise on how these activities might be improved and better integrated and coordinated; 5. Identify new and emerging issues regarding the degradation of the marine environment that are of relevance to governments and sponsoring organizations. In 2001 GESAMP's eight sponsoring organizations commissioned an independent review that concluded that GESAMP should be continued as an agreed source of independent scientific advice on marine environmental protection to the UN system, but with changes to its organization, work methods, and management. The resulting discussions among GESAMP experts, its sponsoring organizations, and a variety of interested external parties have led to a strategic vision for a "New GESAMP" that will: Maintain and strengthen GESAMP's established credibility; Strengthen engagement both with the broader scientific community and with governments and other major user groups to enhance the relevance and legitimacy of GESAMP's advice; and Ensure professionalism in work methods, management, and product delivery. A key feature of the strategy is the establishment of a pool of experts from which members of GESAMP and its working groups will be selected. Governments, intergovernmental and regional organizations, scientific bodies, international NGOs, and other major groups will be encouraged to nominate experts to the pool. Access to this large pool of expertise will ensure GESAMP's inclusiveness and multidisciplinarity, thereby maintaining its scientific credibility. Perhaps more importantly, the pool provides a vital mechanism to engage the broader scientific community. Pool experts who are not current members of GESAMP and its working groups will be kept up to date on GESAMP's activities and products, and have opportunities to participate through, for example, peer review, issue identification, and contributing to ad hoc task teams. This will not only raise GESAMP's profile but also build capacity to participate, not just in GESAMP but in scientific advisory processes generally. GESAMP will proactively seek partnerships for its projects and activities. Governments, intergovernmental and regional organizations, scientific bodies, and international NGOs may, for example, propose and/or sponsor GESAMP projects. In addition, GESAMP will regularly report its findings and advice directly to intergovernmental fora including the United Nations Open- Ended Informal Consultative Process (ICP), Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD), and the governing bodies of its sponsoring organizations. To ensure the relevance, or saliency, of GESAMP's advice, members of important user groups such as scientists, environmental management practitioners, and policy-makers will be explicitly engaged at all phases of GESAMP projects, including their design and execution and the peer review of results. GESAMP products will be professionally edited and produced in appropriate

Page 5 formats to ensure their relevance and user-friendliness, and promoted and distributed so as to maximize their visibility and availability, and therefore their impact. The results of GESAMP's major reviews, analyses, and assessments will continue to be published in the long-standing GESAMP Reports and Studies series, with improved production standards to make the reports more visible and user-friendly. Other GESAMP products will include: An Annual Report of the Chair on GESAMP's activities, conclusions, and recommendations; consensus statements on new and emerging issues and major events related to marine environmental protection; Biennial overviews of the marine environmental assessment activities of the UN sponsoring organizations and other organizations; and An annual business report. GESAMP's strategic plan provides concrete mechanisms to ensure its professionalism, including its effectiveness, efficiency, transparency, and accountability. A GESAMP Office is being established to provide centralized management and a central focal point for GESAMP's interactions with governments and other major groups. All GESAMP activities will be managed on the basis of a two-year rolling work plan, updated annually. Projects will be executed according to a design brief that details the agreed budget, efficient and effective work methods including deadlines and milestones, and plans for the publication, distribution, and promotion of outputs. The annual business report will include performance auditing of GESAMP activities against the work plan and project briefs. GESAMP's core activities will be financed from a Trust Fund, an initial budget estimate for which is US$600,000 annually. Individual project activities will be financed from separate project accounts, which will vary according to project requirements. Of particular interest to GESAMP's sponsoring organizations, their member governments, and other stakeholders is GESAMP's role in marine environmental assessment, particularly in the establishment of the regular Global Marine Assessment (GMA) process called for in UN General Assembly resolution A/RES/57/141. GESAMP has considerable experience in assessing the state of the global marine environment, and is the only established mechanism for inter-agency scientific cooperation and coordination among UN organizations with responsibilities in marine environmental protection. GESAMP is therefore well suited for a leading role in a global scientific panel that designs the scientific component of the GMA and synthesises regional results. GESAMP also believes that, to provide the necessary linkages with the overall process, it should be involved at other levels of the GMA, for example in regional assessments, capacity building, and policy review, but in an information exchange and support role rather than a leadership role.