Instructions for Using Stocker/Feeder Cattle Spreadsheet Tools

Similar documents
University of Missouri Extension, Commercial Agriculture Beef Focus Team

User Manual: Stocker, Feeder Retained Ownership Profit Projection

Ranch to Rail Summary Report

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Grassing Costs. in Manitoba

Grassfed Beef Production Profit Projection and Closeout

Pre-conditioning of Feeder Calves: A Kentucky CPH-45 Case Study

User Manual - Custom Finish Cattle Profit Projection

Update on Preconditioning Beef Calves Prior to Sale by Cow Calf Producers. Objectives of a Preconditioning Program. Vac-45 Calves

Replacement Heifers Costs and Return Calculation Decision Aids

Performance of SE Cattle When Placed on Feed. Gary D. Fike Beef Cattle Specialist Certified Angus Beef LLC Manhattan, KS

Sell or Keep to Upgrading Cull Cows Profit Projection

A Profile of Cattle Feeding: Beyond the Averages

What Value Looks Like to a Feedyard. By Tom Brink

Evaluating Preconditioning Profitability - Projection and Closeout Manual

2018 UW Extension Cattle Feeders Workshops UW Extension Beef Decision Making Tools

Texas A&M Ranch to Rail - North/South Summary Report

Cattle Feeder's Planning Guide

Texas A&M Ranch to Rail - North/South Summary Report. Performance Information

Utah State University Ranch to Rail Summary Report

The Value of Trace-ability

A Seven Year Summary of Feeding Cull Market Cows

Slope Farms. Our farm. Our work with other farmers. Experience with leasing land. Models for seasonal grazing

Factors Affecting Lot Low Choice and Above and Lot Premium Choice Acceptance Rate of Beef Calves in the Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity Program

Welcome to the Fed Cattle Market Simulator

TOC. INDEX Selecting a Custom Feedlot. Freeman Iwasiuk, Sandi Jones, Brenda Ralston and Ken Ziegler. Take Home Message.

The Value of Preconditioning Programs in Beef Production Systems. D.L. Roeber and W.J. Umberger 1

TOC. INDEX Control and Prevention of Diseases of Feedlot Cattle. O. M. Radostits. Take Home Message. Cattle Purchase and Introduction to a Feedlot

EFFECTS OF LIMIT FEEDING ON FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS

Value of Preconditioned Certified Health Programs to Feedlots

Marketing Cull Cows How & When?

Dairy Replacement Programs: Costs & Analysis 3 rd Quarter 2012

Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007

Fed Cattle Pricing. This NebGuide discusses pricing alternatives for fed cattle, including live weight, dressed weight and grid pricing.

Guidelines For Estimating Cost of Raising Dairy Steers For Weight Range of lbs Based on marketing 100 head per year

General Record Book Information

E.A.R. Program (National Carcass Evaluation Program)

The Changing Impact of Economics on Managing Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex in Feedlot Cattle

Determining Your Unit Costs of Producing A Hundred Weight of Calf

Shortkeep Feeder Costs For Weight Range of lbs Based on winter feeding 500 steers & selling in spring

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Feedlot Finishing Costs. in Manitoba

ECONOMICS OF ADDED GAIN

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

SAMPLE COSTS FOR BEEF CATTLE YEARLING/STOCKER PRODUCTION 300 Head

PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF CATTLE, DAIRY PRODUCTION, SWINE PRODUCTION AND FORAGE CROPS IN LOUISIANA, 1997

The Big Picture: Road ahead for the cattle business

Georgia Beef Challenge Rules and Entry Form Ugabeef.com

OPERATING INPUTS Unit Price Quantity Total $/Head. Grain Head $ - 1 $ - $ - Other Feed Additives Head $ - 1 $ - $ -

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

Key Points. Introduction. Materials and Methods. Sides G, PhD * ; Swingle S, PhD ** January 2008

Britt Hicks, Ph.D., PAS Area Extension Livestock Specialist. September 2011

SHEEP FLOCK PLANNING GUIDE,"

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond: A Comparative Analysis Of ND - Demo Cow Herd To North Dakota Database

Which dog do you want to be?

Decisions, Decisions, What do I do with my calf crop? R. Curt Lacy, Ph.D. University of Georgia Tifton Campus

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond A Comparative Analysis Of Demo Herd 1997 Herd To McKenzie County Database

Integration of Pasturing Systems for Cattle Finishing Programs

The Feedlot Industry. Wendy Denning

Beef Cattle Profitability Expectations for Kenny Burdine UK Agricultural Economics

Effects of Feeding Whole Cottonseed on Calf Performance During Preconditioning

SOUTHWEST FEEDERS PROJECT: 4-State Calf Backgrounding Practicum a INTRODUCTION

Backgrounding Cow-calf. Backgrounding for Profit. Backgrounding Cow-calf. Backgrounding Cow-calf VA Veterinary Conference 2/27/16

Cash Flow and Enterprise Information - step two for your 2016 farm analysis

Beef Tips and Cow Chips

Seasonal Trends in Steer Feeding Profits, Prices, and Performance

2012 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Ranch Calculator (RanchCalc)

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profit Cow-Calf Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Cow-Calf Enterprise

extension economics report

3. Total revenue 80,605 1,622

June Area: Sections G K

A Summary of Feeding Market Cows for the White Fat Cow Market

Ranching 101: Ranch Record Keeping. Terrell Miller

GREGORY FEEDLOTS, INC. Custom Cattle Feeding

What Are The Costs/Economics of Finishing Animals For The Freezer?

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profit Cow-Calf Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Cow-Calf Enterprise

Cow/calf Management Winter and Spring

Can Cattle Handling Affect Morbidity. Ron Gill, Ph.D. Texas AgriLife Extension Service College Station, TX

Cost and Return per Lamb - Long Range

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

Northwest Florida Beef Conference Chris Prevatt UF/IFAS Range Cattle REC Livestock and Forage Economist

Performance and Economic Analysis of Calf-Fed and Yearling Systems for Fall-Born Calves

Retained Ownership In Cattle Cycles

Opportunities exist to increase revenue from cull cows through changes in marketing strategies. This figure shows that cull cow prices tend to bottom

Jane Parish Extension Beef Cattle Specialist, Mississippi State University

Amazing times For years. Using the Missouri Recipe for Hitting the Quality Target. Today. Amazing times For years

Strategies for Optimizing Value of Finished Cattle in Value-Based Marketing Grids

Improvement In Calf Predictability Through Management

Pricing/Formula Grids: Which Fit and Which Don't Fit

COSTS OF ADOPTING RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION READER SYSTEMS AND TAGGING SERVICES IN LIVESTOCK AUCTION MARKETS

ECONOMICS OF FEEDING MARKET COWS USING DIFFERENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES 1

Understanding SHRINK in Beef Cattle

Backgrounding Calves Part 1: Assessing the Opportunity

Livestock Pro User Guide

Retained Ownership an Attractive Opportunity this Fall

4-H Livestock Project Book 20

UW-Extension Feeder Cattle Workshops Evaluation Report, Ashley Julka Shelly Hadley David Trechter

CALFWNTR Computer Software

The Potential for Genetic Improvement of Cattle Health

Northern beef case study

RANGE COW CULLING: HERD PERFORMANCE

Transcription:

Instructions for Using Stocker/Feeder Cattle Spreadsheet Tools University of Missouri Extension, Commercial Agriculture Beef Focus Team Evaluation of Buying Feeders This spreadsheet was written in Microsoft Microsoft Excel 1. Conversion to other spreadsheet programs is not guaranteed. You will be asked if you want to enable macros in the spreadsheet. Click on the Enable Macros button. The file has been scanned for viruses and is considered safe as it leaves my office. The starting point for this spreadsheet is the upper left corner (A1) of the Feeder Calculations Page. If you are not at this location as the file is brought up, press <Control><Home>, or use the scroll bars to go to that location. Many of the calculations for this spreadsheet are done on the Sheet 1 page. This page is available for you to look at and to examine the equations used, however you don t need to enter any information on the page and it is locked. If the page is too small or too large for your screen, you can change the magnification by going to the View menu and selecting Zoom and then changing the setting. Depending on what you want to calculate, select (left click) one of the three buttons: Return to Ownership and Management, Purchase Price to Attain Given Return, or Sale Price to Attain Given Return. As with any spreadsheet tool the answers generated are only as accurate as the accuracy of the inputs. Although the mathematical calculations were evaluated by a number of specialists and were tested on thousands of test examples, no warrantee is expressed or implied about the accuracy of the spreadsheet. PLEASE USE THE SPREADSHEET AT YOUR OWN RISK. 1 Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, Washington

To Calculate Return to Ownership and Management You will be asked to fill in several variables concerning the feeding situation you are evaluating, all variables are on a per head basis (not the entire group) Variable Price paid per pound ($) Description The incoming cattle s price per pound. Four decimal places are available so that cattle that are purchased at $82.75/cwt are entered as $0.8275 Purchase weight (Lbs.) Average purchase weight in pounds. For a group of 40 calves that weigh an average of 550 pounds, enter 550, not 22,000. Trucking fee arrival ($) Hired labor cost per head ($) Annual interest rate (i.e. 10) Price paid per pound of diet, as fed ($) Pounds of diet fed daily, as fed Days owned If you are paying trucking fees as the cattle arrive, enter the per-head charge. (There will be another entry for trucking fees to ship the cattle out) This is not where you pay yourself. This line is for any hired labor used to care for the cattle or facilities. One way to calculate the entry is to take the entire payroll and divide by the number of cattle fed per year. Another option is to charge the labor in the feedmill to the feed charge, the processing crew labor to the processing charge, the hospital crew labor to the treatment cost, etc. (in which case the hired labor cost per head is decreased or zero). The entry should be a number greater than 1 if the interest rate is 10%, enter the number as 10, not 0.10. The entry is the interest rate of borrowed money or if no borrowed money is used, the entry is the interest rate or return of an alternate investment. Price is reported on an as-fed (rather than dry-matter) basis. Since more than one diet are fed and the costs of different diet vary, the entry should be the prorated cost of the diets. Feed storage and mixing loss should be included in the diet price. This entry should be the average (over the feeding period) pounds of feed delivered on an as-fed basis to the bunk. This will account for wastage at the bunk. The number of days the cattle are owned in the situation being evaluated.

Yardage per day ($) Cost for processing products ($ for vaccines, implants, dewormers, tags) Morbidity Rate (%) Cost of treatment ($; entire cost of multiple-day treatment) Re-pull rate (%) Cost of re-pull treatment ($) Mortality rate (%) Yardage being charged per day. If you are a farmerfeeder, either enter an appropriate yardage fee or if zero is entered, return to management should be evaluated with that in mind. Your cost for the products used at processing, including the cost of administration equipment (syringes, needles, implant guns, etc.). Processing labor may or may not be included in this value (see Hired Labor Cost per Head) The number of cattle treated for any reason (or that died without being treated) divided by the number of cattle originally in the group. If the morbidity rate is 20%, enter the number as 20, not 0.20. The average cost of antimicrobial or other drugs given to treat sick cattle plus the cost of administration equipment (syringes, needles, etc.) and any chute charges or other applicable fees. Repeat treatment rate and charges are included in this entry. Hospital labor may or may not be included in this value (see Hired Labor Cost per Head). The number of cattle that are treated more than once (after they are considered cured) divided by the number of all cattle treated (i.e. if 20 calves in a pen of 100 are treated for disease and then 4 of those calves are treated for the same disease 2 weeks later, the re-pull rate is 4 20 = 20% ( enter as 20, not 0.20). Many times the drugs used to treat calves pulled from the pen a second (or more) time are different than the initial treatment, therefore the cost is likely to be different. The same guidelines are followed as with Cost of Treatment. The number of cattle that die during the evaluation period divided by the number in the group at the start of the evaluation period. If the mortality rate is 1%, enter the number as 1, not 0.01.

Chronic rate (%) Price received at sale ($/Lbs.) Unshrunk sale weight (Lbs.) Percent shrink (%) Sales or commission fees ($) Trucking fees departure ($) Decreased return for chronics (compared to pen average) A chronic is defined as an animal that has respiratory or other disease and that does not completely recover, nor does it die. The percentage of chronics is often assumed to be equal to the mortality rate for a farm, feedlot, or group of cattle. If your records indicate a rate different than the mortality rate, use the most appropriate number. The sale price expressed on a per-pound basis. Four decimal places are available so that cattle that are sold at $60.75/cwt are entered as $0.6075 The average weight at sale prior to a pencil shrink being applied. The shrink applied to the weight at sale to yield the payweight. The entry should be a number greater than 1 if the pencil shrink is 4%, enter the number as 4, not 0.04. All sales or commission fees prorated on a per-head basis, including beef industry council check-off, brokers commissions, livestock market commissions, etc. If you are paying trucking fees as the cattle leave your farm/feedlot, enter the per-head charge. The economic loss of chronics is greater than the treatment costs alone. This loss is due to slow and inefficient weight gain, and the fact that chronics are usually marketed at a lighter weight (less value) and with a lower value carcass. One researcher reports about a $150 dollar decreased value for chronic animals compared to their pen-mates. Use a value that your records indicate is reasonable.

The bottom portion of the report page gives results calculated from the entered variables. Other output is found on the Sheet 1 page, but the figures reported on the report page are considered to be the most valuable for the situation you are evaluating. Result Cost of interest Average Daily Gain (Deads Out) Average Daily Gain (Deads In) Total Pounds of Feed, as fed Feed Efficiency (Lbs. of feed / 1 Lbs. of gain Deads Accounted For) Cost of Gain (w/o Return to Mgmt. Deads Accounted For) Return to Ownership and Management Description The amount spent on interest (or opportunity from alternate investments) for the evaluated situation. This output was calculated by charging interest for the entire period (days owned) for those expenditures incurred at the start of the feeding period (i.e. price paid, arrival trucking, and processing cost) and for one-half of the days owned for those expenditures incurred throughout the feeding period (i.e. feed, yardage, treatment, re-pull treatment, and labor costs). The gain from purchase weight to shrunk sale weight (pay weight to pay weight) divided by the days owned using the average weights of all the animals sold subtracted from all the purchased (i.e. dead animals were not counted in the animals sold). Differs from the Deads Out calculation in that the total pounds of cattle sold are divided by the number of animals purchased (vs. divided by the number of animals sold) to determine average sale weight. The amount of feed consumed by the group including the feed consumed by animals that died and were not sold. The equation assumes that deaths occurred halfway through the feeding period. The total pounds of feed (as fed) divided by the average pounds of gain (pay-weight to pay-weight change in pounds divided by the number of animals purchased). All of the costs, except purchase cost and return to management, divided by the average pounds of gain (pay-weight to pay-weight change in pounds divided by the number of animals purchased). The dollars returned to pay ownership

To Calculate Purchase Price to Attain A Given Return This set of calculations is designed to aid in determining an appropriate purchase price for cattle with a given expected performance (health, growth, sale value). By using several production scenarios (expected case, best case, worst case), a confidence range can be produced for purchase price. IMPORTANT NOTE Because purchase price is not known as an entry in the calculations, cost of interest is only estimated and therefore cost of gain is also an estimate. The equation to estimate cost of interest and subsequently cost of gain was set to be conservative at the time the spreadsheet was written (1999). Therefore, the estimated appropriate purchase price to attain a given return to management with the entered variables is more likely to error as being too high rather than too low in order to place a safe upper purchase price limit. Variable Description Purchase weight (Lbs.) Average purchase weight in pounds. For a group of 40 calves that weigh an average of 550 pounds, enter 550, not 22,000. Trucking fee arrival ($) Hired labor cost per head ($) Annual interest rate (i.e. 10) Price paid per pound of diet, as fed ($) If you are paying trucking fees as the cattle arrive, enter the per-head charge. (There will be another entry for trucking fees to ship the cattle out) This is not where you pay yourself. This line is for any hired labor used to care for the cattle or facilities. One way to calculate the entry is to take the entire payroll and divide by the number of cattle fed per year. Another option is to charge the labor in the feedmill to the feed charge, the processing crew labor to the processing charge, the hospital crew labor to the treatment cost, etc. (in which case the hired labor cost per head is decreased or zero). The entry should be a number greater than 1 if the interest rate is 10%, enter the number as 10, not 0.10. The entry is the interest rate of borrowed money or if no borrowed money is used, the entry is the interest rate or return of an alternate investment. Price is reported on an as-fed (rather than dry-matter) basis. Since more than one diet are fed and the costs of different diet vary, the entry should be the prorated cost of the diets. Feed storage and mixing loss should be included in the diet price.

Pounds of diet fed daily, as fed Days owned Yardage per day ($) Cost for processing products ($ for vaccines, implants, dewormers, tags) Morbidity Rate (%) Cost of treatment ($; entire cost of multiple-day treatment) Re-pull rate (%) Cost of re-pull treatment ($) This entry should be the average (over the feeding period) pounds of feed delivered on an as-fed basis to the bunk. This will account for wastage at the bunk. The number of days the cattle are owned in the situation being evaluated. Yardage being charged per day. If you are a farmerfeeder, either enter an appropriate yardage fee or if zero is entered, return to management should be evaluated with that in mind. Your cost for the products used at processing, including the cost of administration equipment (syringes, needles, implant guns, etc.). Processing labor may or may not be included in this value (see Hired Labor Cost per Head) The number of cattle treated for any reason (or that died without being treated) divided by the number of cattle originally in the group. If the morbidity rate is 20%, enter the number as 20, not 0.20. The average cost of antimicrobial or other drugs given to treat sick cattle plus the cost of administration equipment (syringes, needles, etc.) and any chute charges or other applicable fees. Repeat treatment rate and charges are included in this entry. Hospital labor may or may not be included in this value (see Hired Labor Cost per Head). The number of cattle that are treated more than once (after they are considered cured) divided by the number of all cattle treated (i.e. if 20 calves in a pen of 100 are treated for disease and then 4 of those calves are treated for the same disease 2 weeks later, the re-pull rate is 4 20 = 20% (enter as 20, not 0.20). Many times the drugs used to treat calves pulled from the pen a second (or more) time are different than the initial treatment, therefore the cost is likely to be different. The same guidelines are followed as with Cost of Treatment.

Mortality rate (%) Chronic rate (%) Price received at sale ($/Lbs.) Unshrunk sale weight (Lbs.) Percent shrink (%) Sales or commission fees ($) Trucking fees departure ($) Return to ownership and management ($) Decreased return for chronics (compared to pen average) The number of cattle that die during the evaluation period divided by the number in the group at the start of the evaluation period. If the mortality rate is 1%, enter the number as 1, not 0.01. A chronic is defined as an animal that has respiratory or other disease and that does not completely recover, nor does it die. The percentage of chronics is often assumed to be equal to the mortality rate for a farm, feedlot, or group of cattle. If your records indicate a rate different than the mortality rate, use the most appropriate number. The sale price expressed on a per-pound basis. Four decimal places are available so that cattle that are sold at $60.75/cwt are entered as $0.6075 The average weight at sale prior to a pencil shrink being applied. The shrink applied to the weight at sale to yield the payweight. The entry should be a number greater than 1 if the pencil shrink is 4%, enter the number as 4, not 0.04. All sales or commission fees prorated on a per-head basis, including beef industry council check-off, brokers commissions, livestock market commissions, etc. If you are paying trucking fees as the cattle leave your farm/feedlot, enter the per-head charge. The dollar amount you as the owner of the cattle want for your management expertise, risk assumption, and return on investment. The economic loss of chronics is greater than the treatment costs alone. This loss is due to slow and inefficient weight gain, and the fact that chronics are usually marketed at a lighter weight (less value) and with a lower value carcass. One researcher reports about a $150 dollar decreased value for chronic animals compared to their pen-mates. Use a value that your records indicate is reasonable.

The bottom portion of the report page gives results calculated from the entered variables. Other output is found on the Sheet 1 page, but the figures reported on the report page are considered to be the most valuable for the situation you are evaluating. Result Cost of interest (estimated) Average Daily Gain (Deads Out) Average Daily Gain (Deads In) Total Pounds of Feed, as fed Feed Efficiency (Lbs. of feed / 1 Lbs. of gain Deads Accounted For) Cost of Gain (w/o Return to Mgmt. Deads Accounted For) Appropriate Purchase Price Description The amount spent on interest (or opportunity from alternate investments) for the evaluated situation. This output was calculated by charging interest for the entire period (days owned) for those expenditures incurred at the start of the feeding period (i.e. arrival trucking and processing cost) and for one-half of the days owned for those expenditures incurred throughout the feeding period (i.e. feed, yardage, treatment, re-pull treatment, and labor costs). As well as an entry for interest charged to an estimated purchase price. The gain from purchase weight to shrunk sale weight (pay weight to pay weight) divided by the days owned using the average weights of all the animals sold subtracted from all the purchased (i.e. dead animals were not counted in the animals sold). Differs from the Deads Out calculation in that the total pounds of cattle sold are divided by the number of animals purchased (vs. divided by the number of animals sold) to determine average sale weight. The amount of feed consumed by the group including the feed consumed by animals that died and were not sold. The equation assumes that deaths occurred halfway through the feeding period. The total pounds of feed (as fed) divided by the average pounds of gain (pay-weight to pay-weight change in pounds divided by the number of animals purchased). All of the costs, except purchase cost and return to management, divided by the average pounds of gain (pay-weight to pay-weight change in pounds divided by the number of animals purchased). The estimated purchase price you can pay to achieve your desired return if the cattle perform as entered into the spreadsheet. The purchase price is an estimate rather than strictly a result of a mathematical equation because the cost of interest is an estimate.

To Calculate Sale Price to Attain A Given Return This set of calculations is designed to determine the sale price for cattle with a given expected performance (health, growth, sale value) that will yield a given return. By using several production scenarios (expected case, best case, worst case), a confidence range can be produced for sale price. Variable Price paid per pound ($) Description The incoming cattle s price per pound. Four decimal places are available so that cattle that are purchased at $82.75/cwt are entered as $0.8275 Purchase weight (Lbs.) Average purchase weight in pounds. For a group of 40 calves that weigh an average of 550 pounds, enter 550, not 22,000. Trucking fee arrival ($) Hired labor cost per head ($) Annual interest rate (i.e. 10) Price paid per pound of diet, as fed ($) Pounds of diet fed daily, as fed If you are paying trucking fees as the cattle arrive, enter the per-head charge. (There will be another entry for trucking fees to ship the cattle out) This is not where you pay yourself. This line is for any hired labor used to care for the cattle or facilities. One way to calculate the entry is to take the entire payroll and divide by the number of cattle fed per year. Another option is to charge the labor in the feedmill to the feed charge, the processing crew labor to the processing charge, the hospital crew labor to the treatment cost, etc. (in which case the hired labor cost per head is decreased or zero). The entry should be a number greater than 1 if the interest rate is 10%, enter the number as 10, not 0.10. The entry is the interest rate of borrowed money or if no borrowed money is used, the entry is the interest rate or return of an alternate investment. Price is reported on an as-fed (rather than dry-matter) basis. Since more than one diet are fed and the costs of different diet vary, the entry should be the prorated cost of the diets. Feed storage and mixing loss should be included in the diet price. This entry should be the average (over the feeding period) pounds of feed delivered on an as-fed basis to the bunk. This will account for wastage at the bunk.

Days owned Yardage per day ($) Cost for processing products ($ for vaccines, implants, dewormers, tags) Morbidity Rate (%) Cost of treatment ($; entire cost of multiple-day treatment) Re-pull rate (%) Cost of re-pull treatment ($) Mortality rate (%) The number of days the cattle are owned in the situation being evaluated. Yardage being charged per day. If you are a farmerfeeder, either enter an appropriate yardage fee or if zero is entered, return to management should be evaluated with that in mind. Your cost for the products used at processing, including the cost of administration equipment (syringes, needles, implant guns, etc.). Processing labor may or may not be included in this value (see Hired Labor Cost per Head) The number of cattle treated for any reason (or that died without being treated) divided by the number of cattle originally in the group. If the morbidity rate is 20%, enter the number as 20, not 0.20. The average cost of antimicrobial or other drugs given to treat sick cattle plus the cost of administration equipment (syringes, needles, etc.) and any chute charges or other applicable fees. Repeat treatment rate and charges are included in this entry. Hospital labor may or may not be included in this value (see Hired Labor Cost per Head). The number of cattle that are treated more than once (after they are considered cured) divided by the number of all cattle treated (i.e. if 20 calves in a pen of 100 are treated for disease and then 4 of those calves are treated for the same disease 2 weeks later, the re-pull rate is 4 20 = 20% (enter as 20, not 0.20). Many times the drugs used to treat calves pulled from the pen a second (or more) time are different than the initial treatment, therefore the cost is likely to be different. The same guidelines are followed as with Cost of Treatment. The number of cattle that die during the evaluation period divided by the number in the group at the start of the evaluation period. If the mortality rate is 1%, enter the number as 1, not 0.01.

Chronic rate (%) Unshrunk sale weight (Lbs.) Percent shrink (%) Sales or commission fees ($) Trucking fees departure ($) Return to ownership and management ($) Decreased return for chronics (compared to pen average) A chronic is defined as an animal that has respiratory or other disease and that does not completely recover, nor does it die. The percentage of chronics is often assumed to be equal to the mortality rate for a farm, feedlot, or group of cattle. If your records indicate a rate different than the mortality rate, use the most appropriate number. The average weight at sale prior to a pencil shrink being applied. The shrink applied to the weight at sale to yield the payweight. The entry should be a number greater than 1 if the pencil shrink is 4%, enter the number as 4, not 0.04. All sales or commission fees prorated on a per-head basis, including beef industry council check-off, brokers commissions, livestock market commissions, etc. If you are paying trucking fees as the cattle leave your farm/feedlot, enter the per-head charge. The dollar amount you as the owner of the cattle want for your management expertise, risk assumption, and return on investment. The economic loss of chronics is greater than the treatment costs alone. This loss is due to slow and inefficient weight gain, and the fact that chronics are usually marketed at a lighter weight (less value) and with a lower value carcass. One researcher reports about a $150 dollar decreased value for chronic animals compared to their pen-mates. Use a value that your records indicate is reasonable.

The bottom portion of the report page gives results calculated from the entered variables. Other output is found on the Sheet 1 page, but the figures reported on the report page are considered to be the most valuable for the situation you are evaluating. Result Cost of interest Average Daily Gain (Deads Out) Average Daily Gain (Deads In) Total Pounds of Feed, as fed Feed Efficiency (Lbs. of feed / 1 Lbs. of gain Deads Accounted For) Cost of Gain (w/o Return to Mgmt. Deads Accounted For) Sale Price to Attain Given Return Description The amount spent on interest (or opportunity from alternate investments) for the evaluated situation. This output was calculated by charging interest for the entire period (days owned) for those expenditures incurred at the start of the feeding period (i.e. price paid, arrival trucking, and processing cost) and for one-half of the days owned for those expenditures incurred throughout the feeding period (i.e. feed, yardage, treatment, re-pull treatment, and labor costs). The gain from purchase weight to shrunk sale weight (pay weight to pay weight) divided by the days owned using the average weights of all the animals sold subtracted from all the purchased (i.e. dead animals were not counted in the animals sold). Differs from the Deads Out calculation in that the total pounds of cattle sold are divided by the number of animals purchased (vs. divided by the number of animals sold) to determine average sale weight. The amount of feed consumed by the group including the feed consumed by animals that died and were not sold. The equation assumes that deaths occurred halfway through the feeding period. The total pounds of feed (as fed) divided by the average pounds of gain (pay-weight to pay-weight change in pounds divided by the number of animals purchased). All of the costs, except purchase cost and return to management, divided by the average pounds of gain (pay-weight to pay-weight change in pounds divided by the number of animals purchased). The sale price needed to return the entered Return to ownership and management if the cattle perform as expected.