Transportation Performance Measures Safety Target-Setting

Similar documents
Transportation Performance Measures Safety Target-Setting

FHWA TPM Framework and Capability Maturity Model (CMM)

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet

AGENDA ITEM #13: MAP-21/FAST ACT SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS Keith Nichols, HRTPO

TTAC STAFF REPORT. State Targets for the MAP-21/FAST Act National Highway Performance Program. MEETING DATE: August 2, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MAP-21/FAST Act Performance Measures and Targets. MEETING DATE: September 20, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 4H

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet

Implementation of Transportation Performance Management Title Program Subtitle

IDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PROJECT METRICS. February 2018

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

USDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING (PBPP)

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures. Presented by: Jason Pavluchuk Association for Commuter Transportation

Addendum 1: Performance Measures

Safety Performance Management: Target Setting and Coordination. Stephen Ratke, P.E. FHWA Texas Division

Transportation Performance Management Update. September / October 2018

Table of Contents PERMIAN BASIN MPO TIP 2

TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Asset Management and Pavement Performance Measures The 30, mile view.

Title Subtitle. Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium Session 1-D, Asset Management Meeting and Performance Measures I August Date 19, 2015

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

2017 Transportation Leadership Academy

Performance Measures Target Setting. Surface Transportation Technical Committee October 26, 2018

MAP 21: Rulemaking and Asset Condition

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

Performance Measures & Asset Management Plan - Key Implementation Dates

Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Advisory Committee Action Request

MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress Title in the 21 st Century Subtitle

National Performance Measure Target Recommendations

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Chapter IX Regional Performance

PURPOSE OF THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

Update on Federal Transportation Performance Management Rules

Performance Measures National Best Practices Spencer Stevens MI Transportation Planning Association August 8, 2014

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MEASURES IMPLEMENTING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT INTO R2CTPO PLANS AND PROGRAMS

RTC Position on Pavement Condition Targets

May 20, 2015 Russ Dudley VDOT - Local Assistance Division. May 20, 2015 Todd Halacy VDOT - Local Assistance Division

2/15/2018. Metropolitan and Statewide Transportation Planning Requirements. Austin, Texas February 15, PART 1 Background

RESOLUTION NO

Management. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office

Performance Measures Target Setting Regional Transportation Council

West Virginia Division of Highways Transportation Asset Management. MPO/LTAP Conference Partnering for a Better Future April 19, 2018

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Title Performance Subtitle Management: Advancing a National Meeting Transportation System Date

Addendum #3 to the Regional Transportation Plan

Safety Performance Measurement

Implementation of MAP-21 Performance TitleProvisions Subtitle

Performance Measures

Sarasota/Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization. Performance Targets/Project Priorities Process September 2018

Regional Transportation and Land Use Performance Measures. July 7, 2010 Eric Stringfield Director of Transportation and Land Use

FHWA Update. MPO/ COG Conference. Jessica Hekter, AICP February 5, 2019

What Does the FHWA Rulemaking on Bridge Performance Measures Mean to You?

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional. Brad Shelton, VDOT Chris Detmer, VDOT Ben Mannell, VDOT

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century MAP-21

BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD

Introduction. National Performance Requirements. Addressing Performance in Mobility 2045

Introduction. National Performance Requirements. Addressing Performance in Mobility 2045

Planning for MassDOT s Capital Investment Plan (CIP) Bryan K. Pounds Manager, MPO Activities Office of Transportation Planning

Performance Planning Target Setting Procedures

Ohio Performance Based Planning MPO/Public Transit Operator/ODOT Agreement Addendum*

Subject: Memorandum of Understanding Between the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Safety Performance Management Targets. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

Moving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan

Amendment 4 - OKI 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Advisory Committee Action Request

Washington State DOT: Pavement and Bridge Performance NPRM Comments for federal docket,

MAP-21 National Highway Performance Program Asset Management Plan

Performance Based Planning and Federal Target Setting. Transportation Policy Board September 13, 2018

congestion management process

MAP-21 National Performance Management Measures. An Overview of Notice of Proposed Rulemakings And TAM Plans

Framework for ADOT Asset Management System. Jean A. Nehme, PhD, PE Arizona Department of Transportation

SAFETY TARGETS AND THE STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN (SHSP)

FEDERAL PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS (PEAs)

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING

CHAPTER 6 PERFORMANCE PLANNING. Performance-Based Planning and Programming

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Relationship to 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - Goals and Performance Measures

IDOT s Long Range Vision and Plan: Transforming Transportation for Tomorrow Performance Management background Tracking & Monitoring performance at

MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress Title in the 21 st Century Subtitle

STATEWIDE & NONMETROPOLITAN & METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

Technical Memorandum 4A PERFORMANCE MEASURES

I-270 NORTH EA PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN NEPA

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

MEETING SUMMARY FOR APRIL 13, 2017

FAMPO RESOLUTION ADOPTING REGIONAL CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PERFORMANCE MEASURE TARGETS

ADVANCING NEW STRATEGIC FOCUSES THROUGH PERFORMANCE-BASED EVALUATION THE GROWTH OF STATE DOT APPROACHES

Appendix E. Congestion Management Process. Congestion Management Process

Federal Transit Administration. Planning Information Exchange June 13, 2014

PLANES, TRAINS & SEMIS South Carolina s Statewide Freight Plan

NYSDOT-NYSAMPO Planning Program Integration

UPDATE ON FEDERAL RULEMAKING AND PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING & PROGRAMMING

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional Classification System. Briefing to MPOs, PDCs, and Local Governments

CORE MPO Freight Transportation Plan. Project Advisory Committee

FY 2019 Unified Planning Work Program FINAL. Regional Intergovernmental Council. June 14, Kanawha Putnam Metropolitan Planning Organization

Performance Measures for Freight Transportation

August 19, (c) Establishment of Performance Measures.

20-Year State Highway Investment Plan. Appendix C ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY APPENDIX C ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY PAGE C-1

Mobility Performance Measures

KANSAS WORK ZONE SAFETY AND MOBILITY PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES

Transcription:

Safety Target-Setting RRTPO Technical Advisory Committee 7/11/2017 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Transportation Planner

Introduction This presentation will focus on: Statewide safety plan and target-setting Data and tools available for RRTPO target-setting TAC consideration of a Performance Measures and Target-Setting Working Group Progress Report 2017 2

Progress Report 2017 3

Virginia SHSP - Goals and Objectives Source: Virginia 2017-2021 Strategic Highway Safety Plan http://www.virginiadot.org/info/resources/shsp/va_2017_shsp_final_complete.pdf Progress Report 2017 4

Virginia SHSP Goals and Objectives Source: Virginia 2017-2021 Strategic Highway Safety Plan http://www.virginiadot.org/info/resources/shsp/va_2017_shsp_final_complete.pdf

Virginia SHSP PM Reduction Rates Source: Virginia 2017-2021 Strategic Highway Safety Plan http://www.virginiadot.org/info/resources/shsp/va_2017_shsp_final_complete.pdf Progress Report 2017 6

Virginia SHSP Strategies Source: Virginia 2017-2021 Strategic Highway Safety Plan http://www.virginiadot.org/info/resources/shsp/va_2017_shsp_final_complete.pdf Progress Report 2017 7

Virginia SHSP - Safety Targets (draft) Statewide Data (2015) Statewide Reduction Rate (annual) Statewide Target (2021) Number of Fatalities 753 2% decrease 670 Rate of Fatalities (per 100 Million VMT) 0.91 3% decrease 0.74 Number of Serious Injuries 8,014 5% decrease 5,900 Rate of Serious Injuries (per 100 Million VMT) 9.66 7% decrease 6.25 Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries 704 4% decrease* 531 * Based on RRTPO staff calculation - needs to be confirmed with VDOT Progress Report 2017 8

RRTPO plan2040 Goal Progress Report 2017 9

RRTPO Safety Data - Fatalities Note: Figure above is for illustrative purposes only. Progress Report 2017 10

RRTPO Safety Data - Fatalities Note: Figure above is for illustrative purposes only. Progress Report 2017 11

RRTPO Safety Data - Fatalities Note: Figure above is for illustrative purposes only. Progress Report 2017 12

RRTPO Safety Data - Fatalities Note: Figure above is for illustrative purposes only. Progress Report 2017 13

RRTPO Safety Data - Fatalities Note: Figure above is for illustrative purposes only. Progress Report 2017 14

RRTPO Safety Data - Fatalities Note: Figure above is for illustrative purposes only. Progress Report 2017 15

RRTPO Target-Setting Progress Report 2017 16

RRTPO Target-Setting Tentative FY 18 Schedule August 31, 2017 VDOT reports safety targets in annual HSIP report to FHWA October 2017 Comment period on draft TPM- Progress Report 2017 to include Safety PMs and Targets Potential TAC PM Working Group July 11, 2017 Staff presentation to TAC on safety data, tools and recommended next steps for safety target setting September 12, 2017 TAC recommendation to follow state targets or agree to RRTPO specific Progress Report 2017 17

Staff Recommendation Establish Performance Measures and Target- Setting Working Group to: Convene for a maximum of 3 conference calls and/or in-person meetings on safety targets Provide recommendation to TAC on: Targets for five required safety PM s Strategies or initiatives to contribute to achievement of targets Progress Report 2017 18

Staff Recommendation Requested Action: Appoint TAC members and/or alternates to a Performance Measures and Target- Setting Working Group Progress Report 2017 19

Chris Wichman cwichman@richmondregional.org (804) 323-2033

Additional Background Slides Progress Report 2017 21

Background Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) Established a performance- and outcome-based program Objective: For States and MPOs to invest resources in projects that collectively make progress toward the achievement of seven national goals. Source: FHWA, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/pm.cfm Progress Report 2017 22

Background Declaration of Policy: Performance management will transform the Federal-aid highway program and provide a means to the most efficient investment of Federal transportation funds by refocusing on national transportation goals, increasing the accountability and transparency of the Federal-aid highway program, and improving project decision-making through performance-based planning and programming. [ 1203; 23 USC 150(a)] Source: FHWA, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/title23usc.pdf, page 140 Progress Report 2017 23

National Performance Goals for the federal-aid highway program Source: [ 1203; 23 USC 150(b)], FHWA, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/pm.cfm Progress Report 2017 24

National Performance Measures Rulemaking Safety PM Final Rule (4/14/2016 effective date) Infrastructure PM Final Rule (5/20/2017 effective date) System Performance PM Final Rule (5/20/2017 effective date) Final Performance Measures Number of fatalities Rate of Fatalities Number of Serious Injuries Rate of Serious Injuries Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries Percentage of pavements of Interstate System in Good condition Percentage of pavements of Interstate System in Poor condition Percentage of pavements of the non-interstate NHS in Good condition Percentage of pavements of the non-interstate NHS in Poor condition Percentage of NHS bridges classified as in Good condition Percentage of NHS bridges classified as in Poor condition Percent of Person-Miles Traveled on Interstate that are Reliable Percent of Person-Miles Traveled on non-interstate NHS that are Reliable Percent change in tailpipe CO2 emissions on the NHS compared to 2017 Truck Travel Time Reliability Index Annual Hours of peak hour excessive delay per capita Percent of non-sov travel Total emissions reduction Progress Report 2017 25

Performance Targets State targets: Within one year of the DOT final rule on PMs, States are required to set performance targets for each measure. MPO targets: Within 180 days of States setting performance targets, MPOs are required to set targets for each measure (where applicable). Progress Report 2017 26

National Performance Measures (where applicable) Rulemaking Safety PM Final Rule (4/14/2016 effective date) Infrastructure PM Final Rule (5/20/2017 effective date) System Performance PM Final Rule (5/20/2017 effective date) Final Performance Measures Number of fatalities Rate of Fatalities Number of Serious Injuries Rate of Serious Injuries Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries Percentage of pavements of Interstate System in Good condition Percentage of pavements of Interstate System in Poor condition Percentage of pavements of the non-interstate NHS in Good condition Percentage of pavements of the non-interstate NHS in Poor condition Percentage of NHS bridges classified as in Good condition Percentage of NHS bridges classified as in Poor condition Percent of Person-Miles Traveled on Interstate that are Reliable Percent of Person-Miles Traveled on non-interstate NHS that are Reliable Percent change in tailpipe CO2 emissions on the NHS compared to 2017 Truck Travel Time Reliability Index Annual Hours of peak hour excessive delay per capita Percent Not of non-sov applicable travel to RRTPO in first reporting period Total emissions reduction Progress Report 2017 27

Performance Targets MPOs can: Adopt unique targets, report metrics specific to the metropolitan planning area; or Agree to State DOT targets, report metrics specific to the metropolitan planning area. Progress Report 2017 28

Performance Targets MPOs Roles and Responsibilities Include targets in planning documents Metropolitan Transportation Plans [ 1201; 23 USC 134(i)(2)(B)] Transportation Improvement Programs [ 1201; 23 USC 134(j)(2)(D)] Link investment priorities to performance targets Report on progress Progress Report 2017 29

Performance Targets Metropolitan Transportation Plans (MTPs) shall include: A description of the (federally required) performance measures and targets used to assess performance of the MPOs transportation system. A system performance report evaluating the performance of the transportation system with respect to the (federally required) performance targets including progress achieved by the MPO on meeting performance targets. Source: FHWA, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tpm/rule/160614presentation.pdf Progress Report 2017 30

Performance Targets Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs) shall: Include a description of the anticipated effect of the TIP toward achieving the performance targets identified by the MPO in the MTP. Link investment priorities in the TIP to the achievement of performance targets in the MTP. Source: FHWA, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tpm/rule/160614presentation.pdf Progress Report 2017 31

Performance Targets - Accountability Certification of planning process for Transportation Management Areas (TMAs) Requires the Secretary to certify at least once every four years whether the metropolitan planning process of an MPO serving a TMA meets the requirements, including the requirements of 23 USC 134 and other applicable Federal law. One of these requirements is to include a performance-based approach in the metropolitan transportation planning process (see 23 USC 134(h)(2)). Absent this certification, DOT may withhold up to 20% of the funds attributable to the metropolitan planning area. [ 1201; 23 USC 134(k)(5)] Source: FHWA, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/pm.cfm Progress Report 2017 32

PMs and Targets Tentative FY 18 Schedule August 31, 2017 VDOT reports safety targets in annual HSIP report to FHWA October 2017 Comment period on draft TPM- Progress Report 2017 to include Safety PMs and Targets Potential TAC PM Working Group July 11, 2017 Staff presentation to TAC on safety data, tools and recommended next steps for safety target setting September 12, 2017 TAC recommendation to follow state targets or agree to RRTPO specific Progress Report 2017 33

PMs and Targets Tentative FY 18 Schedule February 27, 2018 Deadline for MPOs to establish and report Safety PMs and Targets May 20, 2018 VDOT reports state targets for Infrastructure and System Performance PMs (anticipated) Potential TAC PM Working Group November 2, 2017 TPO Board reviews final TPM- Progress Report 2017 and considers approval of Safety PMs and Targets May 27, 2018 MTP PM compliance required (upon updates on or after this date) TIP PM compliance required (upon updates on or after this date) Progress Report 2017 34