CLAAS JAGUAR 960. DLG Test Report 6168 F. CLAAS Selbstfahrende Erntemaschinen GmbH

Similar documents
DLG Test Report 6190 F Hirschmann Automotive GmbH HC4 1000V Connector

GIN P6-60 Photovoltaic Module

DLG Test Report JOHN DEERE GmbH & Co. KG. HarvestLab. (SW 51 LKS 08/17) Ingredients in liquid cattle manure.

DLG Test Report JOHN DEERE GmbH & Co. KG. HarvestLab (SW 132 LKS 09/17) Ingredients in liquid cattle manure.

Straw blower V-Comfort Turbo

DLG Test Report 6239 F. Bioret Agri. Pacific Waterbed. BTS Cattle1 (Females) Test Center Technology and Farm Inputs.

Qualidisc compact disc harrow

Spreading quality farm manure and compost Universal spreader BERGMANN TSW 5210 / TSW A 16

Rubber mat RM21BS. DLG Test Report DeLaval

Cow Mattress Animattress I

Mini Swinging Brush MSB

DTX 300 mounted short disc harrow with deep loosening tines

PAL-VITAL feeding bowl for broilers

SL 400 combination cultivator/disc harrow

Practice-based quality tests

Biogas store membranes

DeLaval rubber mat RM20N

Setting standards. Testing quality. Providing orientation.

PAL-DINDOPAL 60 DDP feeding bowl for turkeys

COMIA COMBINE HARVESTER

Brouwers lying box mattress Polysoft 3507 Pro

Networking. Developing knowledge. Promoting innovation.

Kraiburg Comfort Mat Type KKM

Plot Combine Harvester

CEMOS setup and controls guide. CLAAS LEXION combines

Chopping quality. What really matters.

WORK ECONOMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE

EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY MAIZE HEADER

Supranusa Mattress Roll

2/24/2015. Totally independent laboratory providing extensive testing of Feed, Forage, Soil, Manure and Water.

EASY Efficient Agriculture Systems ISARIA CROP SENSOR

CLAAS TELEMATICS. TELEMATICS: Increasing performance.

COMPACT CULTIVATOR KRISTALL

DLG Test Report 6235 F. Lemmer-Fullwood GmbH. Fullwood Merlin. Hygiene, consumption figures. Test Center Technology and Farm Inputs.

AGROCOM BIOGAS. System competence Biogas management

Compedes Softbed. DLG Test Report 5980 LELY. Short description

VARIABLE CHAMBER BALER WRAPPER VARIO. The Professional Choice

CHAPTER 5 INSPECTION OF PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

SEED BED COMBINATION KORUND 8

Floor Cover Comfort Slat Mat

FLEXIBILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY: THE EXCLUSIVE ADDED VALUE OF AUTOMATIC GRINDING

600. Grass silage thickening technology using centrifugal undirected action vibrator

EASY The name says it all.

The open network and professional voice of agriculture, agribusiness and the food sector

LELY ATTIS Round bale wrappers

Unit D: Agricultural Equipment Systems. Lesson 6: Operating, Calibrating, and Maintaining Forage Harvesting and Handling Systems

RELIABLE WOOD CHIPPING PTO PRODUCT CATALOGUE. Reliable machines designed for demanding users

Taarup BIO Round Bale Processor. Compact machine with excellent manoeuvrability

EasyFix TM Slat Rubber System

PROVEN RELIABLE BEST VALUE. Maize Catalogue. forage, biogas & grain

Combine harvesters LEXION

Creating Yield Maps & Turning them into Money Making Management Tools

Kenafand other fiber crops: harvesting and storage trials in Italy

u-drill Universal multi-seeding combination The sum of precision and operator convenience

Input analyses of maize harvesting and ensilaging technologies

Appraisals on Poplar Harvesting Methods Through Energy Conservation Efficiency

XCV STRIPPER HEADER STRIPPER HEADER SHELBOURNE.COM REYNOLDS

Farmers & MANUFACTURERS

CALIBRATION OF FERTILIZER APPLICATION EQUIPMENT ON-FARM

Energy Efficiency: Tractors and Field Machines

MagixX-Pig+ three-stage exhaust air treatment system for pig housing

Study of the economics and development potential of SRWC

Agriculture. Paper 1. Centre Number. Student Number. Total marks 70

Full scale implementation of short rotation willow coppice, SRC, in Sweden

Kraiburg Walking Surface Cover for Cattle, Type KURA P

Kraiburg Walking Surface Cover for Cattle, Type KURA S

Reliable & quality agricultural machineries

Plant Population Effects on Corn Silage Yield and Quality

Variable Chamber. The Professional Choice

Development of Biomass Harvesting Systems

218 HP ACTIVA7344 FROM MASSEY FERGUSON

More information:

Summary sheet - fuel measurement and sampling procedures Version 1

Optimisation of Transport Capacity for Fodder-Straw in Syria

Applying Precision Agriculture to Harvesting

Focus TD TARGETED LOOSENING, TARGETED FERTILISATION, TARGETED SOWING

How do EurAgEng and agricultural engineers contribute to innovation for sustainable intensification of Agriculture

CLAAS corncracker expertise. It's all about processing performance.

How the choice of the logistic chain can influence on the environmental impacts of the agro-energy system. Dott. Luigi PARI

Silo block cutter. Hydrofox HQ

Condor. Condor tine seeder with working widths up to 15 m

Mechanical Seed Drills

Ohio Farm Custom Rates 2014 Barry Ward, Leader, Production Business Management Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics

Agriculture. Paper 1. Centre Number. Student Number. Total marks 70

PRECISION DRILL AZURIT 9

Sprinter NT. Sprinter SW INNOVATIVE AND ROBUST TINE SEEDING TECHNOLOGY

Claas Jaguar 950 Operators Manual READ ONLINE

Bale Chopper/Feeders Bedding and Feeding - Flexibility to Reduce Your Costs

NEW PAINT FERTILOC+ - FERTIMAX. SOWING FERTILISER

Research and Development on Wheat No-Tillage Seeders in Annual Double Cropping System in Central China

Many Iowa farmers hire some custom machine work

2009 RATES PAID BY KANSAS FARMERS FOR CUSTOM WORK

Kultistrip Strip-till for row crops. Save Costs, Ensure Yields

The sowing and tillage specialists. Precision Cultivator

Terms and conditions of supply Main warehouse, Aachen

Fully automatic stationary Single Pallet Machine

ECHIPAMENT TEHNIC DE SORTARE-CALIBRARE MERE TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT FOR SORTING APPLES BY SIZE

Building construction machinery and equipment Plants for the preparation of concrete and mortar. Part 1: Terminology and commercial specifications

ASSESSMENT OF A LASER SCANNER ON AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY

OCTOPUS - FERTILOC+ - FERTIMAX

Transcription:

DLG Test Report 6168 F CLAAS Selbstfahrende Erntemaschinen GmbH CLAAS JAGUAR 960 Moisture measurement in maize with an NIR sensor on the forage harvester's discharge spout Test Center Technology and Farm Inputs www.dlg.org

Overview The Focus Test is a DLG usability test intended to allow product differentiation and special highlighting of innovations in machinery and technical products used primarily in agriculture, forestry, horticulture, fruit cultivation and viticulture, as well as in landscape and municipal management. This test focuses on testing a product's individual qualitative criteria, e.g. fatigue strength, performance, or quality of work. The scope of testing can include criteria from the testing framework of a DLG Signum Test, the DLG's extensive usability test for technical products, and concludes with the publishing of a test report and the awarding of a test mark. In the DLG Focus Test "Moisture measurement in maize", the data obtained on the harvested crop's moisture content with dry matter sensors is compared with the results of dry matter determination according to the official reference method, and an assessment is made of the agreement between the resulting pairs of values. The DLG test was conducted during the 2013 harvest season with a mobile CLAAS NIR sensor (model year: 2014) installed on the discharge spout of a CLAAS Jaguar 960. In order to cover as broad a range of applications as possible, chopping was conducted at two locations (Lower Saxony and Brandenburg) with four maize varieties with different levels of dry matter content. Several truckloads were harvested of each maize variety and the sensor data relating to their moisture content was recorded. Then, during unloading at the silo, representative composite samples were taken from each truckload and submitted for laboratory analysis. The reference value determined with the official method for each truckload was compared with the corresponding sensor data, and the absolute deviation was determined. Furthermore, the accuracy of yield measurement with the CLAAS QUANTIMETER was also examined in the test using reference weighings on a calibrated vehicle scale. Other criteria were not investigated. Assessment Brief Summary Overall, the measurements obtained with the mobile CLAAS NIR sensor on the forage harvester's discharge spout showed good agreement with the official reference method for moisture determination in maize over a broad range of dry matter levels from 21 % DM to 40 % DM. In 36 of 38 reference measurements, the observed deviation lies within a tolerance range of less than 2 % (absolute) between the sensor value and laboratory value, as defined for the assessment, and none of the deviations are greater than 3 % (absolute). In 23 of 36 values pairs or 64 % of all value pairs the deviation in the dry matter content indicated by the sensor is no greater than 1 % abs. Furthermore, 95 % of the values lie within the 2 % abs deviation. The mobile CLAAS NIR sensor on the forage harvester's discharge spout therefore satisfies the requirements for the DLG Focus Test "Moisture measurement in maize". Table 1: Overview of the results of the "Moisture measurement" field trial Individual results for four levels of dry matter content Overall result* 23 VP: < 1 % abs 13 VP: 1 to 2 % abs 2 VP: 2 to 3 % abs (VP = value pair) Maize variety Number of loads DM content acc. to reference method [%] DM content acc. to sensor measurement [%] Average deviation [% abs DM] Diamantis 12 37.1 [35.0 39.7] 37.6 [35.1 40.4] 0.5 P 9027 11 32.0 [29.8 34.2] 31.2 [30.5 31.5] 0.7 P 8327 10 28.5 [27.0 30.7] 27.6 [26.8 28.6] 0.9 Kimberley 5 22.5 [20.8 23.6] 23.0 [21.9 24.7] 0.6 * Number of value pairs (VPs) from a total of 38 reference analyses with a deviation of % abs DM (absolute dry matter deviation) DLG Test Report 6168 F Page 2 of 8

The Product Manufacturer and Applicant CLAAS Selbstfahrende Erntemaschinen GmbH Münsterstrasse 33 D-33428 Harsewinkel Product: CLAAS JAGUAR 960 with NIR sensor and CLAAS QUANTIMETER Contact: +49 (0)5247-120 infoclaas@claas.com www.claas.de Description and Technical Data Functional principle of the NIR sensor (near-infrared sensor) For the sensor used in the test to measure moisture, the measurement principle is based on nearinfrared spectrometry (NIR). The measurement process runs continuously throughout the harvesting process without affecting the forage harvester's crop flow. In the discharge spout, a light source fires a beam of radiation at the harvested crop as it flows past. The way this beam is reflected varies depending on how moist the harvested crop is. Figure 2: CLAAS NIR sensor on the forage harvester's discharge spout, functional diagram (CLAAS product photo) The analyser unit detects the reflected portion and breaks it down into its constituent spectrum. The measured spectrum is compared with a saved calibration model that is optimised for the selected crop type. The corresponding DM content is determined from this. The calibration models are based on numerous prior analyses of harvestedcrop samples. There is no need for the operator to calibrate the system. A measurement is taken 20 times a second in order to achieve a high level of measurement accuracy. The forage harvester's CEBIS onboard information system uses these measurements to output the average value once a second. The average DM content can be called up on a field-by-field basis via the job counter information. Figure 3: Measuring-head unit on the discharge spout (CLAAS product photos) Figure 4: Analyser unit on the rear side of the driver's cabin (CLAAS product photo) DLG Test Report 6168 F Page 3 of 8

Figure 5: CLAAS Jaguar in field operation (CLAAS product photo) Forage harvester The forage harvester used in the test was a CLAAS Jaguar 960 with an ORBIS 750 AC TS Pro 10-row maize header with a working width of 7.5 m. The forage harvester is driven by a Mercedes Benz engine with a capacity of 16 litres and a power of 480 kw (653 HP) according to ECE R 120 at 1,800 rpm. The exhaust gas is post-treated by the well-known SCR system (Selective Catalytic Reduction). The engine is installed at right angles to the driving direction. The chopper unit, the Corn Cracker and the crop accelerator are driven directly via the power band. Other features include the "V-MAX" knife drum, stepless cutting-length adjustment and hydraulic dischargeaccelerator adjustment. The standard features also include the CEBIS on-board information system, which also monitors and documents the NIR sensor's data. This allows job management on a field- by-field basis in order to record the area treated per hour, the fuel consumption and the crop quantity with respect to fresh and dry matter. The Method In the DLG Focus Test "Moisture measurement in maize", a field trial was conducted in order to test the mobile CLAAS NIR sensor installed on the discharge spout of a CLAAS Jaguar 960. The machine was equipped with a "VMAX 24" knife drum and a CLAAS MULTI CROP CRACKER (MCC). In the test, the forage harvester's basic settings were based on the local harvesting conditions and were determined in preliminary tests. The chopping length was set to 8 mm, the crop accelerator was set to 10 mm and the Corn Cracker was set to 1.8 mm. The "DYNAMIC POWER" engine characteristic control was activated. The harvester was driven in first gear without all-wheel drive. These settings remained unchanged throughout the measurement runs. The aim of the DLG Focus Test "Moisture measurement in maize" is to determine the accuracy of mobile dry matter sensors for dry matter determination in maize in comparison to the official reference method (drying-cabinet method). In order to cover as broad a range of applications as possible, the trials are conducted with different maize varieties with at least three different levels of dry matter content. In each version of the trial, at least 10 truckloads are harvested and the data on the average dry matter content is documented for each load using the mobile NIR sensors on the discharge spout. After unloading at the silo, a representative composite sample is produced from each truckload using a sufficient number of samples (see Figures 7 to 9). The composite sample produced in this way is then homogenised. At least three representative subsamples are then produced from each homogenised composite sample and transferred to suitable containers. The fresh matter sample weight is determined and documented directly at the time of filling. The containers are sealed, labelled and kept refrigerated on a temporary basis. Three subsamples from each truckload are Figure 7 to 9: Sample taking and sample processing at the silo DLG Test Report 6168 F Page 4 of 8

used to determine the dry matter using the official method in the contract laboratory. The mean value for the dry matter content is determined as a reference value according to the official method from the laboratory values for the three subsamples from each truckload. These mean values from the laboratory analysis are compared with the corresponding data from the mobile dry matter sensors, and the absolute deviations between the sensor data and reference values are calculated for the resulting value pairs of dry matter content data. In addition, the DLG test included an analysis of the recording accuracy of the forage harvester's yield using the CLAAS QUANTIMETER. For this purpose, the crop quantity of each individual load is determined using a calibrated vehicle scale. The reference values obtained in this way are compared with the output value from the forage harvester's onboard information computer, and the absolute deviations and coefficient of determination are determined for the value pairs. The Test Results in Detail Table 2: Overview of the maize varieties and trial locations Maize variety Description of variety Crop Yield [t FM/ha]* P 9027 Dent maize, medium early medium late Silage maize ripeness rating ~260 Maize grain ripeness rating ~260 PIONEER Hi-Bred Diamantis Intermediate type, medium early Silage maize ripeness rating ~250 Maize grain ripeness rating ~250 Euralis Saaten GmbH P 8327 Dent maize, medium late FAO 270 Silage maize ripeness rating ~270 Maize grain ripeness rating ~ 270 PIONEER Hi-Bred Kimberley Dent maize, late Silage maize ripeness rating ~300 Maize grain ripeness rating ~320 Saaten-Union GmbH Homogeneous Plant height approx. 3.5 m Number of cobs 1 2 Row spacing 75 cm Homogeneous Plant height approx. 3.5 m Number of cobs 1 2 Row spacing 75 cm Less homogeneous Plant heights 3 3.5 m Number of cobs 1 2 Row spacing 75 cm Less homogeneous Plant heights 2.5 3.2 m Number of cobs 1 2 Row spacing 75 cm Approx. 53.4 Approx. 51.4 Approx. 48.7 Approx. 46.6 Trial location Number of loads DM [ %]** Lower Saxony 11 32.0 [29.8 34.2] Lower Saxony 12 37.1 [35.0 39.7] Brandenburg 10 28.5 [27.0 30.7] Brandenburg 5 22.5 [20.8 23.6] Harvesting conditions The field test was conducted in the 2013 harvest season at two locations in northern Lower Saxony and Brandenburg. Two trial areas, cultivated with different maize varieties, were available at each trial location. In total, four maize varieties with different levels of dry matter content were harvested in the DLG test (see Table 2). At the trial location in northern Lower Saxony, the maize crops were relatively homogeneous with growth heights of approx. 3.5 m and fresh matter yields between 51 t/ha and 54 t/ha. The crops available for the test in Brandenburg were less homogeneous, with growth heights of 2.5 to 3.5 m and yields of 46 t/ha FM to 49 t/ha FM. Figures 10 and 11: Harvesting conditions on a trial area in Lower Saxony * Determined from harvested loads / ** According to official reference method DLG Test Report 6168 F Page 5 of 8

Dry matter [%] 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 K5 K4 K3 K2 K1 P8-10 P8-9 P8-8 P8-7 P8-6 P8-5 P8-4 P8-3 P8-2 P8-1 D12 D11 D10 D9 D8 D7 D6 D5 D4 D3 D2 D1 P9-11 P9-10 P9-9 P9-8 P9-7 P9-6 P9-5 P9-4 P9-3 P9-2 P9-1 Trial number DM silo DM SPFH Figure 12: Comparison between the DM content indicated by the CLAAS NIR sensor and the reference values determined according to the drying-cabinet method DM SPFH [%] 45 43 41 39 37 35 33 31 29 R 2 = 0.9596 27 25 23 21 19 17 15 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 DM silo, drying cabinet [%] Figure 13: Correlation between the DM values indicated by the NIR sensor (DM SPFH) and the laboratory values determined from sampling at the silo Fresh matter [t] 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 Test-weighing K5 K4 K3 K2 K1 P8-10 P8-9 P8-8 P8-7 P8-6 P8-5 P8-4 P8-3 P8-2 P8-1 D12 D11 D10 D9 D8 D7 D6 D5 D4 D3 D2 D1 P9-11 P9-10 P9-9 P9-8 P9-7 P9-6 P9-5 P9-4 P9-3 P9-2 P9-1 Trial number } Test-weighing Figure 14: Comparison of the weights outputted by the vehicle scale and the CLAAS QUANTIMETER Vehicle scale CLAAS Quantimeter Test-weighing Dry matter determination with the CLAAS NIR sensor Figure 12 shows the deviations of the dry matter content determined by the NIR sensor from the reference values determined with the official method. In total, 38 eligible trial runs were conducted with four maize varieties at the two locations. In the graph, the measured values from the dry matter sensor are shown in red and the results from the laboratory analysis are shown in blue. Each reference value from the laboratory analysis is assigned a tolerance range of +/- 2 % abs in the graph. The sensor value's deviation lies within a tolerance range of 2 % abs in 36 of 38 value pairs, and none of the deviations exceed a value of 3 % abs. In 23 of 36 value pairs or 64 % of all value pairs the deviation in the dry matter content indicated by the sensor is no greater than 1 % abs. Furthermore, 95 % of the values lie within the 2 % deviation. A high degree of agreement is therefore achieved between sensor values and reference values. Over all measurement runs, this results in a coefficient of determination of R² = 0.96 (see Fig 13) for the CLAAS NIR sensor values in comparison to the dry matter content from the reference analysis and an average deviation of 0.7 % in the indicated dry matter content across all trialled maize varieties, as well as a broad dry matter range from 21 % DM to 40 % DM. The mobile CLAAS NIR sensor on the forage harvester's discharge spout therefore satisfies the requirements for the DLG Focus Test "Moisture measurement in maize", and the agreement between the sensor values and reference values can be classified as good according to the DLG assessment scale. Additional test of yield recording with the CLAAS QUANTIMETER In addition, the DLG test included an analysis of the recording accuracy of the forage harvester's yield with the CLAAS QUANTIMETER. For this purpose, the crop quantity DLG Test Report 6168 F Page 6 of 8

Fresh matter SPFH [t] 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 Fresh matter vehicle scale [t] R 2 = 0.95673 Figure 15: Correlation between the harvested matter indicated by the SPFH's yield measurement [t] and the fresh matter weights determined with the vehicle scale [t] of each individual load was determined using a calibrated vehicle scale. The reference values obtained in this way were compared with the output value from the forage harvester's on-board information computer, and the absolute deviations and coefficient of determination were determined for the value pairs. At each change in variety, the trial runs were preceded by a calibration measurement. The value pairs for each individual load are shown in Figure 14. The calibration factor calculated through test-weighing in measurement run P8-1 was not applied in the CLAAS QUANTIMETER. This led to a large deviation in measurement run P8-2. Following repetition of the test-weighing, consistently good agreement was achieved with regard to crop quantity between the yield measurement and the vehicle scale. Over a total of 38 measurement runs, a total crop quantity of 139.9 t FM was determined with the vehicle scale. The combined yields from the CLAAS QUAN - TI METER data gave a value of 140.2 t FM. Without taking into account the calibration runs, there is a difference of around 300 kg DM (corresponding to about 0.2 %) between the total quantity determined with the vehicle scale and the CLAAS QUANTIMETER from 38 measurement runs. Here, the coefficient of determination in the comparison of the CLAAS QUANTIMETER data and the reference value is also R 2 = 0.96 (see Figure 15). Overall, the yield measurement with the CLAAS QUANTIMETER shows good agreement with the reference values using the vehicle scale. This high degree of agreement can only be achieved, however, if test-weighing is carried out for the purposes of calibration when the variety changes, the chopping lengths are changed, or there is strong variation in dry matter content in the crop. Summary The DLG Focus Test "Moisture measurement in maize" shows that the measurements obtained with the mobile CLAAS NIR sensor on the forage harvester's discharge spout achieve good agreement with the official reference method for moisture determination in maize over a broad range of dry matter levels from 21 % DM to 40 % DM. In 36 of 38 reference measurements, the determined deviation in dry matter content between the sensor value and laboratory value does not exceed 2 % abs ; moreover, the deviation is less than 1 % abs in 23 value pairs. In the DLG test, none of the sensor values exceed the permissible tolerance with a deviation of more than 3 % abs. At 96 %, the coefficient of deter mination for sensor value vs. laboratory value is at a very high level, and the average deviation between sensor value and reference value is 0.7 %. The mobile CLAAS NIR sensor on the forage harvester's discharge spout therefore satisfies the requirements for the DLG Focus Test "Moisture measurement in maize", and the DLG test mark was awarded. Furthermore, an accompanying analysis was made of the yield measurement with the CLAAS QUANTIMETER. A high level of accuracy can also be achieved here if test-weighing is carried out when the variety changes and when the chopping length is changed. For crops with strong variations in dry matter content, regular test-weighing seems to be advisable for checking purposes in order to maintain the high level of accuracy. DLG Test Report 6168 F Page 7 of 8

Further Information Further tests on mobile dry matter sensors on forage harvesters can be downloaded from the "Forage Harvester" section at www.dlgtest.de/ernte. Within the field of the DLG's technical work, the DLG Committee for Technology in Crop Production deals closely with the topic of harvest technology. Instruction leaflets and documents relating to this technical work, which is carried out on a voluntary basis, are available free of charge in PDF format at www.dlg.org/technik_pflanzenproduktion.html The DLG In addition to conducting its wellknown tests of agricultural technology, farm inputs and foodstuffs, the DLG acts as a neutral, open forum for knowledge exchange and opinion-forming in the agricultural and food industry. Around 180 full-time staff and more than 3,000 expert volunteers develop solutions to current problems. More than 80 committees, working groups and commissions form the basis for expertise and continuity in technical work. Work at the DLG includes the preparation of technical information for the agricultural sector in the form of instruction leaflets and working documents, as well as contributions to specialist magazines and books. The DLG organises the world's leading trade exhibitions for the agriculture and food industry. In doing so, it helps to discover modern products, processes and services and to make these transparent to the public. Test execution DLG e.v., Test Center Technology and Farm Inputs, Max-Eyth-Weg 1, D-64823 Groß-Umstadt DLG testing framework Focus Test "Moisture measurement in maize" Field Crop production technology Project manager Dr Ulrich Rubenschuh Obtain access to knowledge advance ment and other advantages, and collaborate on expert know ledge in the agricultural industry! Please visit www.dlg.org/mitgliedschaft for further information. Test engineer(s) Dipl. Ing. (FH) Johannes Speer* Laboratory analyses Landeskontrollverband Brandenburg e.v. Straße zum Roten Luch 1a D-15377 Waldsieversdorf LUFA Nord-West Jägerstraße 23-27 D-26121 Oldenburg * Reporting engineer The DLG Test Center Technology and Farm Inputs The DLG Test Center Technology and Farm Inputs in Groß-Umstadt sets the benchmark for tested agricultural technology and farm inputs and is the leading provider of testing and certification services for independent technology tests. With the latest measurement technology and practical testing methods, the DLG's test engineers carry out testing of both product developments and innovations. As an EU-notified test laboratory with multiple accreditations, the DLG Test Center Technology and Farm Inputs provides farmers and practitioners with important information and decision-making aids, in the form of its recognised technology tests and DLG tests, to assist in the planning of investments in agricultural technologies and farm inputs. ENTAM European Network for Testing of Agricultural Machines is the association of European test centres. ENTAM's objective is the Europewide distribution of test results for farmers, agricultural equipment dealers, and producers. More information about the Network is available at www.entam.com or by writing to ENTAM at the email address: info@entam.com 13-374 2014 DLG DLG e.v. Test Center Technology and Farm Inputs Max-Eyth-Weg 1, D-64283 Groß-Umstadt Tel. +49 69 24788-600, Fax +49 69 24788-690 tech@dlg.org www.dlg.org Download all DLG test reports free of charge at: www.dlg-test.de! DLG Test Report 6168 F Page 8 of 8