What Could New Ozone Regulations Cost Missouri?

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA Agricultural Experiment Station

Missouri Dairy Industry Revitalization Study Section 2: Economic Contribution

What Could New Ozone Regulations Cost Kansas?

PLANNING POLICY AND GUIDELINES FOR MISSOURI LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARDS Program Years

What Could New Ozone Regulations Cost North Carolina?

COUNTY GOVERNMENT Benton CONTACT INFORMATION Bollinger MISSOURI Boone Adair Buchanan Andrew Butler Atchison Caldwell Audrain Callaway Barry Camden

What Could New Ozone Regulations Cost Georgia?

TIMBER STAND IMPROVEMENT

Indiana Energy Status

Analysis of NBI Data for California Bridges

Indiana Energy Landscape

State of the Air in Arkansas

Assessing the Potential Economic and Distributional Impacts of a Tighter Ozone NAAQS

PUBLIC POWER = + + LOCAL CONTROL LOW RATES HIGH RELIABILITY

QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR SHRP2 R06C TECHNOLOGIES

Educating and Training Tomorrow s Workforce

The Future of Coal-fired Generation: Challenging the EPA

Non-Ambulatory Cattle and Calves

Developing a Framework for Integrated Energy Network Planning

35,895 2,298 $21,015. Central Workforce Investment Area RETAIL TRADE ANALYSIS. Retail Pull Factors. Employment. Number of Industries.

Labor Market Equilibrium

Construction & Materials Outlook. March 9, 2009 Ken Simonson, Chief Economist AGC of America USA

OF PIPEDREAMS AND PIPELINES

Destination for Education? Your Facility. Bring Us to You!

Milk Production, Disposition, and Income

Watershed Plan Implementation in Oklahoma: What We Do and What We ve Learned

HOW CAN WE MAKE MORE JOBS GOOD JOBS?

NUCLEAR BY THE NUMBERS A PRIL

IPNI North American Soil Test Summaries. Tom Jensen, Director in North America Program Cell:

Sarah Doll, Safer States BizNGO December 2014

The Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI): An Infrastructure Model for Evaluating Tobacco Control Programs

Farms and Land in Farms

Potential Damage from Asian Longhorned Beetle

Condition of Illinois Infrastructure for Commodities

Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) Program. American Association of Port Authorities 2013 Security Seminar July 17, 2013

State of the Network. EN2014 February 25, 2014

Phosphorus Management in North Carolina. Deanna L. Osmond Department of Soil Science NC State University


Mary. E. Torrence DVM, Ph.D., DACVPM National Program Leader, Food Safety

EPA Carbon Regulations Stakeholder Meeting

Farm Computer Usage and Ownership

NCHRP 20 68A U.S. Domestic Scan Program. Domestic Scan 13 03

The Bee Informed Partnership Management Survey Results (2011) Respondent Profile. BeeInformed.org

Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 70 E. Lake Street, Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois

Goal Setting: Nutrient Pollution Standards and Technology. October 29, Ephraim King OST

Infrared Technology: Its Application and Benefit

Outline. Outlook for Crop Farm Income, Cash Rents, Farmland Prices, and Agricultural Credit. U.S. Corn Yield, U.S.

Laws are like. better not to see. made.

Capacity of Refrigerated Warehouses

Energy and Water: Emerging Issues and Challenges. Mike Hightower Water for Energy Project Lead Sandia National Laboratories

Bridge Management Questionnaire Report

Sierra Club National Survey on Coal, Climate and Carbon Pollution Key Findings

A Comparison of In-Service Statistical Test Programs

2011 State Average Electricity Prices (cents/kwh)

FHWA SHRP2 Overview & National Perspective. Steve Cooper SHRP2 Renewal Pavement Engineer

U.S. HRW Wheat Crop Update

CPAs Making Sense of a Changing and Complex World. October 24, 2011 NASBA 104 th Annual Meeting Gregory J. Anton, CPA AICPA Chairman

Agricultural Land Values

Compensation Survey for Missouri and Illinois. Instructions

The Future of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in North America

COUNTY OF KANE. Eldon F. Gould Geneva, Illinois Wayne Gehrke (630)

Today s Propane. National Propane Gas Association

Risk Mitigation Benefits of Energy Efficiency

Toward Zero Deaths (TZD): a National Strategy on Highway Safety. Priscilla Tobias, P.E. State Safety Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation

The Pyrogeographyof Wildfires in the Western U.S.

Update on Energy Efficiency Opportunities in the Commonwealth

MA Perspectives on Building Priorities for Climate and Energy Policy

The Impact of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permits on Pesticide Use

LABOR MARKET REVIEW. Region 8 Statistical Data Report for May 2009 Released July 2009

American Wind Energy Association. U.S. Wind Industry Second Fourth Quarter Market Report

The American Clean Energy Security Act (ACES) Creates More American Jobs and Saves Americans Money

Subcommittee on Maintenance Update. Des Moines, Iowa July 20, 2015

Election Day Command Centers: The Vortex 2016 STATE CERTIFICATION TESTING OF VOTING SYSTEMS NATIONAL CONFERENCE MIT JUNE 20, 2016

Oil & The Economy: Boom-to-Bust and the Impact to States.

FHWA Cooperative Agreement Subtask. Longitudinal Joints Intelligent Compaction

Consumer-Friendly and Environmentally-Sound Electricity

U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter 2014 U.S. Wind Industry First Quarter 2016 Market Report Market Report

Manufactured Housing In the United States

Future of the US Federal Highway Program

Environmental Law and Railroads

REGIONAL ENERGY BASELINES AND MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION PROTOCOLS

Farm Radio Habits Wave 1, Winter Conducted by Millennium Research, Inc.

The #1 PHR/SPHR Certification Prep Tool

Dallas Integrated Corridor Management

Renewable Energy Buyers Alliance (REBA): Accelerating GHG reductions through a buyer-led movement

NCHRP 20-68A US Domestic Scan Program. Scan Advances In Civil Integrated Management (CIM)

Tack Coat Best Practices

IDOT HMA Update. Christine M. Reed, P.E. Director Division of Highways Illinois Department of Transportation

Fiscal Year 2010 Drinking Water and Ground Water Statistics

NCHRP 20-68A US Domestic Scan Program

Special Update: Salary Budget Survey

Issues and Challenges for Transportation Fuels. Mike Hightower Sandia National Laboratories

Land Values and Cash Rents: 2008 Summary

High Yield Systems: Role of Placement and Timing

EPOXY INTEREST GROUP EPOXY-COATED REINFORCING STEEL IN PARKING GARAGES

CO 2 Emissions Profile of U.S. Cement Industry

Advanced Fuel Cycles?

THIS IS SUPERFUND. A Citizen s Guide to EPA s Superfund Program

IDEM Update. ACEC Indiana Environmental Business and Funding Conference September 15, 2016 The Willows, Indianapolis

Transcription:

$ What Could New Ozone Regulations Cost Missouri? $27 Billion Gross State Product Loss from 2017 to 2040 38,182 Lost Jobs or Job Equivalents 1 per Year $17 Billion in Total Compliance Costs $820 Drop in Average Household Consumption per Year $2 Billion More for Residents to Own/Operate Their Vehicles Statewide (2017 to 2040) 1 Total job equivalents equal total labor income change divided by the average annual income per job. Updated 8/15. Expensive New Ozone Regulation Will Put the Squeeze on Missouri The Environmental Protection Agency s (EPA) new ozone regulation could be the most expensive ever issued on the American public, costing the nation $140 billion annually, 2 according to a new analysis (updated in August 2015) by NERA Economic Consulting. This regulation will make it harder to get the necessary permits to manufacture goods and build critical infrastructure like roads and highways in Missouri, while increasing the cost of energy for every business and household in the state. The picture gets even worse for the counties in the red and orange in the maps in figure 1. In these areas, manufacturers won t be able to expand without a reduction of emissions or shutdown of operations from other plants in the area. Plans for new plants and expansion at existing plants will be shelved. Federal highway funds could freeze and economic growth could grind to a halt. Figure 1: Projected Nonattainment with a 65 Parts Per Billion (ppb) Ozone Standard Areas with monitors Unmonitored but likely to exceed 65 ppb CA Projected Nonattainment in Missouri (65 ppb) OR WA NV ID Projected 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Areas AZ UT MT WY NM CO ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR WI IL MI IN MI TN KY OH WV SC NC VA NY PA NJ MD DE DC VT NH MA RI CT ME MS AL GA 2 This estimate only accounts for the costs and related economic impacts of bringing the country into attainment with a 65 pbb ozone standard. It does not account for any additional costs incurred by businesses complying with maintenance requirements for attainment areas. This estimate also does not account for any potential curtailment of energy production in nonattainment areas. In NERA s July 2014 report measuring a 60 ppb ozone standard, they found that a significant curtailment of natural gas production in nonattainment areas could further reduce GDP by $90 billion per year and cost an additional 1.4 million job-equivalents per year. TX LA FL Monitored CBSAs and rural counties that would be violating a 65 ppb standard Unmonitored areas that are anticipated to violate a 65 ppb standard based on spatial interpolation Projected Nonattainment in the United States (65 ppb) Based on a 3-year period, 2011-2013. Source: URS, July 7, 2014 Source: URS

Franklin 82 Jefferson 82 Lincoln 82 St. Charles 82 St. Louis 82 Warren 82 St. Louis city 82 Bates 78 Caldwell 78 Carroll * 78 Cass 78 Clay 78 Clinton 78 Jackson 78 Lafayette 78 Livingston * 78 Platte 78 Ray 78 Dunklin * 77 Jasper 77 Newton 77 Pemiscot * 77 Pike * 77 Barton * 76 Crawford * 76 Daviess * 76 Grundy * 76 Dent * 75 Washington * 75 Harrison * 74 Lawrence * 74

Andrew 73 Buchanan 73 Cedar 73 Dade * 73 DeKalb 73 Gentry * 73 Holt * 73 Mississippi * 73 New Madrid * 73 Perry 73 Reynolds * 73 Scott * 73 Shannon * 73 Stoddard * 73 Benton * 72 Bollinger * 72 Butler * 72 Cape Girardeau * 72 Carter * 72 Christian 72 Dallas 72 Greene 72 Hickory * 72 Iron * 72 Laclede * 72 McDonald 72 Madison * 72 Nodaway * 72 Polk 72 Ripley * 72 St. Clair * 72

Ste. Genevieve 72 St. Francois * 72 Vernon * 72 Wayne * 72 Webster 72 Barry * 71 Henry * 71 Johnson * 71 Worth * 71 Camden * 70 Gasconade * 70 Montgomery * 70 Texas * 70 Wright * 70 Boone 69 Linn * 69 Pettis * 69 Phelps * 69 Pulaski * 69 Saline * 69 Atchison * 68 Audrain * 68 Callaway 68 Chariton * 68 Cole 68 Cooper * 68 Douglas * 68 Howard * 68 Howell * 68 Lewis 68 Macon * 68

Maries * 68 Marion * 68 Miller * 68 Moniteau 68 Monroe 68 Morgan * 68 Oregon * 68 Osage 68 Ozark * 68 Ralls * 68 Randolph * 68 Shelby * 68 Stone 68 Taney 68 Knox * 67 Mercer * 67 Sullivan * 67 Adair * 66 Clark * 66 Putnam * 65 Schuyler * 65 Scotland * 65